WW3finalboss's banner

WW3finalboss

@WW3finalboss • 43,838 subscribers

I like to talk about Ukraine, Europe, Israel, US, Iran - and random Memes 🇺🇦🇪🇺🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷

Shorts

PUTIN'S SUMMER OFFENSIVE REPORTEDLY FAILS AS UKRAINIAN DRONES DISRUPT MOSCOW 🇷🇺🇺🇦🇬🇧🇧🇾 Nearly 500 Ukrainian drones reportedly approached Moscow as Russian military commentators increasingly questioned the results of the Kremlin's offensive operations. While airports descended into chaos, pro-war voices were openly criticizing battlefield claims, military leadership and the enormous cost of Russia's territorial advances. According to an October 15 account by Prof. Bonk, 493 Ukrainian drones were involved in the wave of attacks. Moscow's VIP airport reportedly kept passengers inside aircraft without lighting for up to eight hours, while Russian military blogger Alexei Zhivov warned that the capital was shaking from air-defense interceptions. Two commercial aircraft reportedly declared fuel emergencies near Nizhny Novgorod. Other flights were diverted toward St. Petersburg, while passengers were advised to seek alternative transport. In Minsk, a charter flight was allegedly delayed for two hours without food being provided. Meanwhile, the account attributed a devastating assessment of Russia's summer campaign to the Institute for the Study of War. It claimed Ukrainian forces had recovered 1,046 square kilometers, leaving Russia with a net territorial gain of less than 100 square kilometers during 2026, equivalent to an average advance below one square kilometer per day. Those figures and the characterization of the offensive as a failure require verification against the original assessment, but the broader picture described by Russian commentators was hardly reassuring for Moscow. Near Kherson, Russian troops reportedly attempted a river assault using an inflatable boat. In Zaporizhzhia, the pro-Russian channel Fisherman acknowledged Ukrainian infantry had returned to Malaya Tokmachka, while Oleg Tsarev discussed localized Russian successes but also conceded that Ukrainian forces continued holding their defensive positions. Even Russia's battlefield propaganda was attracting criticism from its own supporters. When official sources reportedly celebrated a decorated Russian soldier for planning an operation involving movement through a pipe behind Ukrainian lines, prominent pro-war commentator Yuri Podolyaka questioned whether the story had been invented. “Let's not make things up... Where did they even get that from?” Conditions in Russian-occupied territories provided another uncomfortable contrast with official claims of stability. A resident of occupied Zaporizhzhia reportedly challenged local authorities after enduring four months without electricity or running water. When officials presented an optimistic account of the situation, another official responded with a pointed reference to fairy-tale authors Hans Christian Andersen and the Brothers Grimm. Elsewhere, in Achinsk, a bankruptcy court reportedly ruled that an impoverished family could manage without its television and vacuum cleaner, suggesting books, newspapers, a broom and a rag as substitutes. Russian military defenses also came under scrutiny. The account criticized the reported failure to provide adequate protection against small drones for expensive S-400 air-defense systems, suggesting that losses of radar and missile assets could create additional vulnerabilities to Ukrainian long-range attacks. From prison, former Russian commander Igor Strelkov offered an even darker assessment. He compared the war to a two-headed creature pulling in opposite directions and going nowhere, while accusing Kremlin officials of pursuing unrealistic expectations reminiscent of the fictional Land of Fools. Strelkov reportedly warned that Ukraine's expanding strike capabilities, including alleged attacks reaching Omsk in Siberia some 1,500 miles away, exposed serious failures within Russia's military leadership. He described the situation as one of “complete incompetence and incapacity.” At the same time, Ukraine faced complications of its own. The account reported that SpaceX imposed a speed restriction of 100 mph on moving Starlink terminals, disrupting certain Ukrainian military missions. Volunteer and drone procurement organizer Serhii Sternenko acknowledged that important operations had been affected. Britain, meanwhile, reportedly accelerated the provision of £10 million worth of anti-drone missiles to strengthen Ukraine's defenses. Several of these operational claims, casualty estimates and strike assessments remain unverified in the material provided. Nevertheless, the contrast emerging from the accounts is striking: Russian officials continue presenting an image of control, while their own military commentators describe stalled advances, equipment vulnerabilities, logistical problems and growing dissatisfaction with the conduct of the war. The Kremlin can dictate official announcements. It cannot make the human and material costs of its offensive disappear simply by declaring success.

PUTIN'S SUMMER OFFENSIVE REPORTEDLY FAILS AS UKRAINIAN DRONES DISRUPT MOSCOW 🇷🇺🇺🇦🇬🇧🇧🇾 Nearly 500 Ukrainian drones reportedly approached Moscow as Russian military commentators increasingly questioned the results of the Kremlin's offensive operations. While airports descended into chaos, pro-war voices were openly criticizing battlefield claims, military leadership and the enormous cost of Russia's territorial advances. According to an October 15 account by Prof. Bonk, 493 Ukrainian drones were involved in the wave of attacks. Moscow's VIP airport reportedly kept passengers inside aircraft without lighting for up to eight hours, while Russian military blogger Alexei Zhivov warned that the capital was shaking from air-defense interceptions. Two commercial aircraft reportedly declared fuel emergencies near Nizhny Novgorod. Other flights were diverted toward St. Petersburg, while passengers were advised to seek alternative transport. In Minsk, a charter flight was allegedly delayed for two hours without food being provided. Meanwhile, the account attributed a devastating assessment of Russia's summer campaign to the Institute for the Study of War. It claimed Ukrainian forces had recovered 1,046 square kilometers, leaving Russia with a net territorial gain of less than 100 square kilometers during 2026, equivalent to an average advance below one square kilometer per day. Those figures and the characterization of the offensive as a failure require verification against the original assessment, but the broader picture described by Russian commentators was hardly reassuring for Moscow. Near Kherson, Russian troops reportedly attempted a river assault using an inflatable boat. In Zaporizhzhia, the pro-Russian channel Fisherman acknowledged Ukrainian infantry had returned to Malaya Tokmachka, while Oleg Tsarev discussed localized Russian successes but also conceded that Ukrainian forces continued holding their defensive positions. Even Russia's battlefield propaganda was attracting criticism from its own supporters. When official sources reportedly celebrated a decorated Russian soldier for planning an operation involving movement through a pipe behind Ukrainian lines, prominent pro-war commentator Yuri Podolyaka questioned whether the story had been invented. “Let's not make things up... Where did they even get that from?” Conditions in Russian-occupied territories provided another uncomfortable contrast with official claims of stability. A resident of occupied Zaporizhzhia reportedly challenged local authorities after enduring four months without electricity or running water. When officials presented an optimistic account of the situation, another official responded with a pointed reference to fairy-tale authors Hans Christian Andersen and the Brothers Grimm. Elsewhere, in Achinsk, a bankruptcy court reportedly ruled that an impoverished family could manage without its television and vacuum cleaner, suggesting books, newspapers, a broom and a rag as substitutes. Russian military defenses also came under scrutiny. The account criticized the reported failure to provide adequate protection against small drones for expensive S-400 air-defense systems, suggesting that losses of radar and missile assets could create additional vulnerabilities to Ukrainian long-range attacks. From prison, former Russian commander Igor Strelkov offered an even darker assessment. He compared the war to a two-headed creature pulling in opposite directions and going nowhere, while accusing Kremlin officials of pursuing unrealistic expectations reminiscent of the fictional Land of Fools. Strelkov reportedly warned that Ukraine's expanding strike capabilities, including alleged attacks reaching Omsk in Siberia some 1,500 miles away, exposed serious failures within Russia's military leadership. He described the situation as one of “complete incompetence and incapacity.” At the same time, Ukraine faced complications of its own. The account reported that SpaceX imposed a speed restriction of 100 mph on moving Starlink terminals, disrupting certain Ukrainian military missions. Volunteer and drone procurement organizer Serhii Sternenko acknowledged that important operations had been affected. Britain, meanwhile, reportedly accelerated the provision of £10 million worth of anti-drone missiles to strengthen Ukraine's defenses. Several of these operational claims, casualty estimates and strike assessments remain unverified in the material provided. Nevertheless, the contrast emerging from the accounts is striking: Russian officials continue presenting an image of control, while their own military commentators describe stalled advances, equipment vulnerabilities, logistical problems and growing dissatisfaction with the conduct of the war. The Kremlin can dictate official announcements. It cannot make the human and material costs of its offensive disappear simply by declaring success.

84,578 views

PUTIN'S GENERALS INVENT VICTORIES WHILE UKRAINE CLAIMS TO HAVE SMASHED AN ENTIRE RUSSIAN DIVISION 🇺🇦🇷🇺 While Russian state television celebrates questionable battlefield victories, Ukrainian forces are said to have carried out a major operation against Russia's 144th Division, capturing 270 soldiers and disrupting a formation involved in an attempted encirclement in Donetsk. The operation, known as Vivaldi, was allegedly kept secret until its conclusion. Accounts describe the Russian division as effectively destroyed, although the scale of its losses and the condition of the formation have not been independently established. Russian military commentators have meanwhile accused their own commanders of staging territorial victories. They describe soldiers being sent into Ukrainian-held settlements to raise Russian flags for brief propaganda videos, sometimes at the cost of their lives, without establishing lasting control. State television has reportedly portrayed stabilisation of the front as the result of a successful "media counteroffensive." An extraordinary choice of words for an army whose territorial claims are being challenged even by its own supporters. The contradiction extends deep into Russia. In Moscow, two men were reportedly arrested over a train-spotting website that published photographs of Putin's armoured train, now treated as sensitive infrastructure. Meanwhile, Ukrainian drone attacks have been associated with fires at St. Petersburg's oil facilities and data centres, as well as disruptions to electrical infrastructure. Russian television allegedly devoted just 30 seconds to the fires before spending more than an hour covering a burning car in Paris. Residents have also questioned why air-raid sirens failed to sound during the attacks. Officials reportedly feared that activating them would cause panic. In Rostov, the governor advised residents to check their smartphones to determine whether a siren indicated a genuine threat. Russia's political establishment has produced some equally remarkable developments. Colonel General Alexander Lapin, whose command came under criticism following Russia's loss of Lyman in 2022, was reportedly approved as Tatarstan's deputy prime minister by an 87-to-1 vote. His new responsibilities include support for veterans of the war. At the same time, figures cited for Russia's proposed 2027 budget suggest defence spending could account for approximately 35% of national expenditure, placing enormous pressure on civilian priorities, including healthcare, education and social programmes. Some regional authorities have reportedly reduced death benefits for soldiers' families from two million rubles to just 100,000. Ukraine is also said to have struck the Druzhba oil pipeline roughly 230 miles inside Russia, continuing its campaign against infrastructure associated with Moscow's war economy. At sea, Russian shadow fleet tankers have reportedly adopted new names, including Sapphire and Jet, while crews have installed protective wire cages against potential drone attacks. But amid the military claims and political absurdities, one account stands apart. Near the Oskil River, Ukrainian infantryman Kostiantyn Vlasenko reportedly survived 491 days isolated behind enemy lines. After a drone strike severely wounded both his legs, the account describes him amputating his own lower limbs to survive. He was eventually evacuated by a heavy hexacopter drone in what has been described as an unprecedented aerial battlefield rescue. The extraordinary details, including the duration of his isolation and the claimed first-of-its-kind evacuation, still require independent confirmation. If established, his survival would represent a remarkable example of human endurance under conditions almost impossible to imagine. There is a bitter contrast running through these accounts: Russian commanders accused of manufacturing victories for television, officials restricting information about attacks on their own cities, and Ukrainian soldiers continuing to fight under extraordinary circumstances. And behind the competing claims, the same war continues to consume soldiers, infrastructure and national resources on a staggering scale.

PUTIN'S GENERALS INVENT VICTORIES WHILE UKRAINE CLAIMS TO HAVE SMASHED AN ENTIRE RUSSIAN DIVISION 🇺🇦🇷🇺 While Russian state television celebrates questionable battlefield victories, Ukrainian forces are said to have carried out a major operation against Russia's 144th Division, capturing 270 soldiers and disrupting a formation involved in an attempted encirclement in Donetsk. The operation, known as Vivaldi, was allegedly kept secret until its conclusion. Accounts describe the Russian division as effectively destroyed, although the scale of its losses and the condition of the formation have not been independently established. Russian military commentators have meanwhile accused their own commanders of staging territorial victories. They describe soldiers being sent into Ukrainian-held settlements to raise Russian flags for brief propaganda videos, sometimes at the cost of their lives, without establishing lasting control. State television has reportedly portrayed stabilisation of the front as the result of a successful "media counteroffensive." An extraordinary choice of words for an army whose territorial claims are being challenged even by its own supporters. The contradiction extends deep into Russia. In Moscow, two men were reportedly arrested over a train-spotting website that published photographs of Putin's armoured train, now treated as sensitive infrastructure. Meanwhile, Ukrainian drone attacks have been associated with fires at St. Petersburg's oil facilities and data centres, as well as disruptions to electrical infrastructure. Russian television allegedly devoted just 30 seconds to the fires before spending more than an hour covering a burning car in Paris. Residents have also questioned why air-raid sirens failed to sound during the attacks. Officials reportedly feared that activating them would cause panic. In Rostov, the governor advised residents to check their smartphones to determine whether a siren indicated a genuine threat. Russia's political establishment has produced some equally remarkable developments. Colonel General Alexander Lapin, whose command came under criticism following Russia's loss of Lyman in 2022, was reportedly approved as Tatarstan's deputy prime minister by an 87-to-1 vote. His new responsibilities include support for veterans of the war. At the same time, figures cited for Russia's proposed 2027 budget suggest defence spending could account for approximately 35% of national expenditure, placing enormous pressure on civilian priorities, including healthcare, education and social programmes. Some regional authorities have reportedly reduced death benefits for soldiers' families from two million rubles to just 100,000. Ukraine is also said to have struck the Druzhba oil pipeline roughly 230 miles inside Russia, continuing its campaign against infrastructure associated with Moscow's war economy. At sea, Russian shadow fleet tankers have reportedly adopted new names, including Sapphire and Jet, while crews have installed protective wire cages against potential drone attacks. But amid the military claims and political absurdities, one account stands apart. Near the Oskil River, Ukrainian infantryman Kostiantyn Vlasenko reportedly survived 491 days isolated behind enemy lines. After a drone strike severely wounded both his legs, the account describes him amputating his own lower limbs to survive. He was eventually evacuated by a heavy hexacopter drone in what has been described as an unprecedented aerial battlefield rescue. The extraordinary details, including the duration of his isolation and the claimed first-of-its-kind evacuation, still require independent confirmation. If established, his survival would represent a remarkable example of human endurance under conditions almost impossible to imagine. There is a bitter contrast running through these accounts: Russian commanders accused of manufacturing victories for television, officials restricting information about attacks on their own cities, and Ukrainian soldiers continuing to fight under extraordinary circumstances. And behind the competing claims, the same war continues to consume soldiers, infrastructure and national resources on a staggering scale.

36,877 views

RUSSIA REPORTEDLY LOSES $200 MILLION IN BOMBERS AS ITS OWN MILITARY BLOGGERS EXPOSE THE CHAOS 🇷🇺🇺🇦 Six Russian Su-34 fighter-bombers reportedly ended up destroyed or severely damaged after being parked together around a single ground power unit, despite protective aircraft shelters standing nearby. According to an October 17 account by Prof. Bonk, Russian aviation personnel allegedly grouped the aircraft together because of a shortage of electrical ground-support equipment. A subsequent Ukrainian missile strike reportedly hit the concentration, with the total losses estimated at approximately $200 million. Pro-war Russian channels were furious. Romanov Light criticized the decision to leave expensive combat aircraft exposed beside available shelters, while aviation commentator Fighterbomber reportedly urged personnel to clear the wreckage before commercial satellites could photograph the aftermath. The reported destruction of all six aircraft and the $200 million estimate remain unverified. The Su-34 is a tactical fighter-bomber widely used to deliver glide bombs against Ukrainian targets, making its availability important to Russian air operations. The same account also revisited the extraordinary case of Lev Stupnikov, a 26-year-old Russian signals lieutenant who allegedly spent five months secretly supplying Ukrainian intelligence with information about his own brigade. Stupnikov reportedly became disillusioned with Russia's invasion and established contact with Ukrainian intelligence through his mother in Omsk. Although he was allegedly offered 250,000 rubles for his cooperation, he refused payment, seeking instead an opportunity to escape Russia's military. Using access to communications and military information, he passed intelligence that reportedly contributed to strikes killing more than 300 Russian soldiers, including Colonel Gusein Musayev, commander of the 36th Motorized Rifle Brigade. Even after commanders began confiscating soldiers' phones, Stupnikov allegedly continued communicating secretly. When a superior joked that there might be a spy in their ranks, the lieutenant reportedly laughed along without revealing himself. On July 6, 2024, he crossed into Ukrainian-controlled territory under drone observation. Once safely across, he contacted his mother. “I have come to where I was supposed to be.” His wife reportedly remained in Russia and publicly denounced him, while his mother and sister subsequently escaped the country. Asked whether he had betrayed his oath to defend Russia's freedom, independence and constitutional order, Stupnikov reportedly answered: “Putin destroyed all three.” The thread also described a Ukrainian strike against the Ryazan oil refinery, approximately 300 miles inside Russia, challenging assumptions that moving valuable infrastructure farther from the front guarantees its safety. Meanwhile, imprisoned former FSB officer Igor Strelkov reportedly questioned claims that Ukrainian drone operations had been crippled by restrictions on Western assistance. He pointed to reports of more than 600 Ukrainian drones operating across 28 Russian regions despite the supposed loss of Starlink support. These developments concern separate events, and the material does not establish that Stupnikov provided intelligence for the reported Su-34 strike. The aircraft losses, casualty figures and individual operational accounts also require independent corroboration. Nevertheless, the accusations emerging from Russian pro-war commentators reveal a recurring concern: expensive military equipment exposed by poor logistics, disputes over command decisions and fears that sensitive information is reaching Ukrainian forces from within Russian ranks. An airfield can be moved hundreds of miles behind the front. That does not automatically protect its aircraft from mistakes made on the ground.

RUSSIA REPORTEDLY LOSES $200 MILLION IN BOMBERS AS ITS OWN MILITARY BLOGGERS EXPOSE THE CHAOS 🇷🇺🇺🇦 Six Russian Su-34 fighter-bombers reportedly ended up destroyed or severely damaged after being parked together around a single ground power unit, despite protective aircraft shelters standing nearby. According to an October 17 account by Prof. Bonk, Russian aviation personnel allegedly grouped the aircraft together because of a shortage of electrical ground-support equipment. A subsequent Ukrainian missile strike reportedly hit the concentration, with the total losses estimated at approximately $200 million. Pro-war Russian channels were furious. Romanov Light criticized the decision to leave expensive combat aircraft exposed beside available shelters, while aviation commentator Fighterbomber reportedly urged personnel to clear the wreckage before commercial satellites could photograph the aftermath. The reported destruction of all six aircraft and the $200 million estimate remain unverified. The Su-34 is a tactical fighter-bomber widely used to deliver glide bombs against Ukrainian targets, making its availability important to Russian air operations. The same account also revisited the extraordinary case of Lev Stupnikov, a 26-year-old Russian signals lieutenant who allegedly spent five months secretly supplying Ukrainian intelligence with information about his own brigade. Stupnikov reportedly became disillusioned with Russia's invasion and established contact with Ukrainian intelligence through his mother in Omsk. Although he was allegedly offered 250,000 rubles for his cooperation, he refused payment, seeking instead an opportunity to escape Russia's military. Using access to communications and military information, he passed intelligence that reportedly contributed to strikes killing more than 300 Russian soldiers, including Colonel Gusein Musayev, commander of the 36th Motorized Rifle Brigade. Even after commanders began confiscating soldiers' phones, Stupnikov allegedly continued communicating secretly. When a superior joked that there might be a spy in their ranks, the lieutenant reportedly laughed along without revealing himself. On July 6, 2024, he crossed into Ukrainian-controlled territory under drone observation. Once safely across, he contacted his mother. “I have come to where I was supposed to be.” His wife reportedly remained in Russia and publicly denounced him, while his mother and sister subsequently escaped the country. Asked whether he had betrayed his oath to defend Russia's freedom, independence and constitutional order, Stupnikov reportedly answered: “Putin destroyed all three.” The thread also described a Ukrainian strike against the Ryazan oil refinery, approximately 300 miles inside Russia, challenging assumptions that moving valuable infrastructure farther from the front guarantees its safety. Meanwhile, imprisoned former FSB officer Igor Strelkov reportedly questioned claims that Ukrainian drone operations had been crippled by restrictions on Western assistance. He pointed to reports of more than 600 Ukrainian drones operating across 28 Russian regions despite the supposed loss of Starlink support. These developments concern separate events, and the material does not establish that Stupnikov provided intelligence for the reported Su-34 strike. The aircraft losses, casualty figures and individual operational accounts also require independent corroboration. Nevertheless, the accusations emerging from Russian pro-war commentators reveal a recurring concern: expensive military equipment exposed by poor logistics, disputes over command decisions and fears that sensitive information is reaching Ukrainian forces from within Russian ranks. An airfield can be moved hundreds of miles behind the front. That does not automatically protect its aircraft from mistakes made on the ground.

24,345 views

🇺🇦🇷🇺 UST-KYTYM JUST LIT UP Something big is exploding near Russia’s Ust-Kytym. Looks like it may be a military base or ammo depot, though that still needs confirmation. Either way, the footage does not look like a small accident. Russia’s rear keeps getting louder, brighter, and a lot less comfortable than Moscow promised.

🇺🇦🇷🇺 UST-KYTYM JUST LIT UP Something big is exploding near Russia’s Ust-Kytym. Looks like it may be a military base or ammo depot, though that still needs confirmation. Either way, the footage does not look like a small accident. Russia’s rear keeps getting louder, brighter, and a lot less comfortable than Moscow promised.

79,748 views

🇺🇦🇷🇺 The Russian flag will never have a place in Ukraine. Ukraine stands firm, defending its land, its people, and its freedom. God bless the Ukrainian defenders. 🫡❤️

🇺🇦🇷🇺 The Russian flag will never have a place in Ukraine. Ukraine stands firm, defending its land, its people, and its freedom. God bless the Ukrainian defenders. 🫡❤️

92,719 views

🇺🇦🇷🇺 SOMETHING IMPORTANT IS BURNING NEAR MOSCOW Something important is reportedly burning in the Moscow region. No confirmed details yet, but the location alone is enough to make people pay attention.

🇺🇦🇷🇺 SOMETHING IMPORTANT IS BURNING NEAR MOSCOW Something important is reportedly burning in the Moscow region. No confirmed details yet, but the location alone is enough to make people pay attention.

60,412 views

🇱🇻🇷🇺 LIVING IN LATVIA MEANS RESPECTING LATVIA A Russian resident in Latvia says she feels “rejection” toward the Latvian language and culture because of “recent events”, yet shows no urgency to return to Russia. Living in a European country is a choice, but integration is not optional. Latvia has every right to protect its language, identity and security, especially after decades of Soviet occupation and amid Russia’s continuing aggression against Ukraine. The issue is not nationality. It is expecting the freedoms of Europe while openly rejecting the country that provides them.

🇱🇻🇷🇺 LIVING IN LATVIA MEANS RESPECTING LATVIA A Russian resident in Latvia says she feels “rejection” toward the Latvian language and culture because of “recent events”, yet shows no urgency to return to Russia. Living in a European country is a choice, but integration is not optional. Latvia has every right to protect its language, identity and security, especially after decades of Soviet occupation and amid Russia’s continuing aggression against Ukraine. The issue is not nationality. It is expecting the freedoms of Europe while openly rejecting the country that provides them.

52,707 views

🇺🇦🚁 Ukraine has spent years intercepting Iranian Shahed drones attacking its cities. They’ve developed real expertise — including drone-on-drone interceptors to hunt them down. So the U.S. asking Ukraine for help against Iranian drones shows how much battlefield knowledge Ukraine now has on stopping them. 🇺🇦🤝🇺🇸

🇺🇦🚁 Ukraine has spent years intercepting Iranian Shahed drones attacking its cities. They’ve developed real expertise — including drone-on-drone interceptors to hunt them down. So the U.S. asking Ukraine for help against Iranian drones shows how much battlefield knowledge Ukraine now has on stopping them. 🇺🇦🤝🇺🇸

78,053 views

🇷🇺 LAVROV ADMITS THE KREMLIN’S REAL WORLD VIEW “The West’s rules-based world order no longer exists. What remains is the law of the strongest.” - Sergey Lavrov 🇷🇺 That is precisely the logic behind Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: force above law, conquest above sovereignty, and power treated as permission.

🇷🇺 LAVROV ADMITS THE KREMLIN’S REAL WORLD VIEW “The West’s rules-based world order no longer exists. What remains is the law of the strongest.” - Sergey Lavrov 🇷🇺 That is precisely the logic behind Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: force above law, conquest above sovereignty, and power treated as permission.

41,811 views

🇺🇦 Ukrainian troops are still heading to the front lines Rotations don’t stop. New units move in, others come out, and it just keeps going. Take a second to wish them safety and victory 🙏

🇺🇦 Ukrainian troops are still heading to the front lines Rotations don’t stop. New units move in, others come out, and it just keeps going. Take a second to wish them safety and victory 🙏

42,927 views

🇺🇸🇺🇦🇷🇺 KELLOGG SAYS RUSSIA CANNOT BOMB UKRAINE INTO SURRENDER Keith Kellogg 🇺🇸 - "Russians keep bombing civilians, trying to take the population out of the war and make them quit. That is not going to happen to Ukraine. Putin can say that all he wants or think it all he wants, but he's going to have to win on the battlefield, and I don't think he is." Russia’s strategy is still built on the same failed assumption: that terror against civilians can break Ukraine’s will. But Ukraine has survived the bombardment, adapted under pressure and kept fighting. Putin cannot win this war by trying to make Ukrainians afraid of defending their own country.

🇺🇸🇺🇦🇷🇺 KELLOGG SAYS RUSSIA CANNOT BOMB UKRAINE INTO SURRENDER Keith Kellogg 🇺🇸 - "Russians keep bombing civilians, trying to take the population out of the war and make them quit. That is not going to happen to Ukraine. Putin can say that all he wants or think it all he wants, but he's going to have to win on the battlefield, and I don't think he is." Russia’s strategy is still built on the same failed assumption: that terror against civilians can break Ukraine’s will. But Ukraine has survived the bombardment, adapted under pressure and kept fighting. Putin cannot win this war by trying to make Ukrainians afraid of defending their own country.

26,595 views

🇺🇦🇷🇺 CRIMEA’S LAND ROUTE IS CHOKING Ukraine is now reportedly controlling the so-called Highway of Death, the land corridor between Russia and Crimea. A week into the campaign, and the message is brutal for Moscow’s logistics: military traffic, fuel, and supply movement can’t just roll through like before. Crimea was supposed to be Russia’s untouchable rear. Now the road feeding it is becoming a trap.

🇺🇦🇷🇺 CRIMEA’S LAND ROUTE IS CHOKING Ukraine is now reportedly controlling the so-called Highway of Death, the land corridor between Russia and Crimea. A week into the campaign, and the message is brutal for Moscow’s logistics: military traffic, fuel, and supply movement can’t just roll through like before. Crimea was supposed to be Russia’s untouchable rear. Now the road feeding it is becoming a trap.

26,649 views

🇫🇮🇪🇺 Stubb says it openly, he wants the EU to become a superpower "I would like to see the EU becoming a superpower" - Alexander Stubb 🇫🇮 That’s a big shift in tone, less about cooperation, more about power. Europe’s debate is clearly moving toward strength, autonomy, and global influence.

🇫🇮🇪🇺 Stubb says it openly, he wants the EU to become a superpower "I would like to see the EU becoming a superpower" - Alexander Stubb 🇫🇮 That’s a big shift in tone, less about cooperation, more about power. Europe’s debate is clearly moving toward strength, autonomy, and global influence.

25,482 views

Ukraine's low-cost interceptor drones destroy 64 Shaheds in one night Ukraine is smart 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

Ukraine's low-cost interceptor drones destroy 64 Shaheds in one night Ukraine is smart 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

19,660 views

Videos

Anya Rossi

sweetdream.ai

SweetDream.ai•Sponsored•Livecam

Watch Anya Live

Anya is streaming live right now! Join her private show and enjoy exclusive content.

Exclusive private shows

1.2k viewers online

Private Show

Join now for exclusive access

Free preview available • Premium content

RUSSIAN TANKER SENT FLYING IN ONE OF THE WILDEST MOMENTS OF THE WAR 🇺🇦🇷🇺🚀 This might be one of the most extraordinary pieces of battlefield footage to emerge from Russia's invasion of Ukraine. A Ukrainian strike sends a Russian tank crewman flying spectacularly into the air, in a sequence that looks almost impossible. Watch closely: the launch happens at the 34-second mark, and the figure comes back down at around 55 seconds. An astonishing sequence captured on camera, showing the sheer violence of the explosion.

RUSSIAN TANKER SENT FLYING IN ONE OF THE WILDEST MOMENTS OF THE WAR 🇺🇦🇷🇺🚀 This might be one of the most extraordinary pieces of battlefield footage to emerge from Russia's invasion of Ukraine. A Ukrainian strike sends a Russian tank crewman flying spectacularly into the air, in a sequence that looks almost impossible. Watch closely: the launch happens at the 34-second mark, and the figure comes back down at around 55 seconds. An astonishing sequence captured on camera, showing the sheer violence of the explosion.

116,340 views • 7 days ago

Never forget, never forgive.

Never forget, never forgive.

236,478 views • 22 days ago

RUSSIA’S 144TH DIVISION SHATTERED AS UKRAINE CLAIMS 8,000 KILLED AND 277 KM² LIBERATED 🇺🇦🇷🇺 Ukraine’s 3rd Army Corps says Operation Vivaldi achieved something Moscow has repeatedly failed to accomplish: a successful offensive against a numerically superior enemy, with dramatically fewer casualties. Speaking to hromadske, Andriy Biletskyi revealed that Ukrainian forces liberated 277 square kilometres of territory and effectively destroyed Russia’s 144th Motor Rifle Division as an organised fighting force. According to Biletskyi, Ukrainian assaults killed more than 8,000 Russian soldiers and captured another 270, including over 20 officers. Two Russian battalion commanders were also killed during the operation’s final phase. He claims Ukrainian forces suffered seven times fewer total casualties than their Russian opponents. When counting fatalities alone, the difference reached approximately ten Russians killed for every Ukrainian killed. Most Ukrainian casualties were wounded, while most Russian losses were deaths, he said. The territorial figures also expose a remarkable discrepancy between Ukrainian assessments and Moscow’s claims. Ukraine calculates that 277 km² were liberated, but Biletskyi argues the same operation would represent 1,260 km² if measured against territory Russia falsely claimed to control. The strategic consequences could be substantial. Biletskyi says Moscow’s original 2026 plan involved breaking out of its Chornyi Zherebets bridgehead toward Sviatohirsk, splitting Ukrainian forces east of the Oskil River and advancing toward Barvinkove. A simultaneous offensive through Dobropillia was intended to complete an encirclement and help Russia capture the remainder of Donetsk Oblast. Operation Vivaldi disrupted those ambitions. According to Biletskyi, the 144th Division of Russia’s 20th Combined Arms Army is no longer functioning as a coherent formation. Moscow has temporarily abandoned both its wider encirclement plan and a costly frontal offensive against Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, concentrating its main effort around Dobropillia. What makes the operation particularly remarkable is the imbalance between the opposing forces. Ukraine attacked using troops already defending approximately 160 kilometres of frontline, which Biletskyi described as the longest sector in the war. Six months earlier, many of these units had been retreating. Russia had more personnel, more drones and substantially greater artillery firepower. Yet Ukrainian forces managed to reclaim territory instead of simply defending their existing positions. Biletskyi also described how Ukrainian strikes have transformed Russian logistics. Ukrainian forces can disrupt supply movements as far as 150 kilometres behind the front, he said. Russian troops who previously disembarked from vehicles just 10 to 15 kilometres from their positions must now unload 40 to 50 kilometres away and complete the remaining journey on foot. In some sectors, ammunition is transported through human supply chains, with soldiers passing artillery shells between one another over distances of 20 to 30 kilometres. On particularly successful days, Biletskyi claims Ukrainian forces destroy as many as 50 Russian vehicles. These figures and assessments remain Ukrainian military claims and have not been independently verified. Russia planned to encircle Ukrainian forces and seize the rest of Donetsk. Biletskyi says Ukraine instead reclaimed 277 km², captured 270 Russian troops and shattered a division central to Moscow’s plans.

RUSSIA’S 144TH DIVISION SHATTERED AS UKRAINE CLAIMS 8,000 KILLED AND 277 KM² LIBERATED 🇺🇦🇷🇺 Ukraine’s 3rd Army Corps says Operation Vivaldi achieved something Moscow has repeatedly failed to accomplish: a successful offensive against a numerically superior enemy, with dramatically fewer casualties. Speaking to hromadske, Andriy Biletskyi revealed that Ukrainian forces liberated 277 square kilometres of territory and effectively destroyed Russia’s 144th Motor Rifle Division as an organised fighting force. According to Biletskyi, Ukrainian assaults killed more than 8,000 Russian soldiers and captured another 270, including over 20 officers. Two Russian battalion commanders were also killed during the operation’s final phase. He claims Ukrainian forces suffered seven times fewer total casualties than their Russian opponents. When counting fatalities alone, the difference reached approximately ten Russians killed for every Ukrainian killed. Most Ukrainian casualties were wounded, while most Russian losses were deaths, he said. The territorial figures also expose a remarkable discrepancy between Ukrainian assessments and Moscow’s claims. Ukraine calculates that 277 km² were liberated, but Biletskyi argues the same operation would represent 1,260 km² if measured against territory Russia falsely claimed to control. The strategic consequences could be substantial. Biletskyi says Moscow’s original 2026 plan involved breaking out of its Chornyi Zherebets bridgehead toward Sviatohirsk, splitting Ukrainian forces east of the Oskil River and advancing toward Barvinkove. A simultaneous offensive through Dobropillia was intended to complete an encirclement and help Russia capture the remainder of Donetsk Oblast. Operation Vivaldi disrupted those ambitions. According to Biletskyi, the 144th Division of Russia’s 20th Combined Arms Army is no longer functioning as a coherent formation. Moscow has temporarily abandoned both its wider encirclement plan and a costly frontal offensive against Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, concentrating its main effort around Dobropillia. What makes the operation particularly remarkable is the imbalance between the opposing forces. Ukraine attacked using troops already defending approximately 160 kilometres of frontline, which Biletskyi described as the longest sector in the war. Six months earlier, many of these units had been retreating. Russia had more personnel, more drones and substantially greater artillery firepower. Yet Ukrainian forces managed to reclaim territory instead of simply defending their existing positions. Biletskyi also described how Ukrainian strikes have transformed Russian logistics. Ukrainian forces can disrupt supply movements as far as 150 kilometres behind the front, he said. Russian troops who previously disembarked from vehicles just 10 to 15 kilometres from their positions must now unload 40 to 50 kilometres away and complete the remaining journey on foot. In some sectors, ammunition is transported through human supply chains, with soldiers passing artillery shells between one another over distances of 20 to 30 kilometres. On particularly successful days, Biletskyi claims Ukrainian forces destroy as many as 50 Russian vehicles. These figures and assessments remain Ukrainian military claims and have not been independently verified. Russia planned to encircle Ukrainian forces and seize the rest of Donetsk. Biletskyi says Ukraine instead reclaimed 277 km², captured 270 Russian troops and shattered a division central to Moscow’s plans.

40,241 views • 5 days ago

russian progress

russian progress

556,610 views • 3 months ago

🇺🇦🇷🇺 SNYDER SAYS RUSSIA IS STRUGGLING AT THE FRONT BUT LEARNING HOW TO FIGHT A MORE DANGEROUS WAR Historian Timothy Snyder has returned from Ukraine’s front lines with an assessment that challenges much of the pessimism surrounding the war: he believes a major Russian breakthrough is unlikely, Ukrainian forces are inflicting substantially greater casualties, and Moscow may be approaching the limits of its ability to recruit soldiers without another mobilization. Snyder says Ukrainian forces are gaining more territory than they lose and imposing disproportionate losses on Russian troops. These are his assessments of the battlefield, not independently established figures for the entire front. But he also warns that Russia has developed a different advantage, one that reaches far beyond the trenches. Russian attacks are systematically damaging Ukraine’s economy, destroying factories, mines, steelworks and the infrastructure people depend on for their livelihoods. Snyder believes Moscow has become more effective at this kind of destruction over the past six months. In other words, Russia may be struggling to achieve a decisive military breakthrough while still inflicting enormous economic damage on the country it is trying to subjugate. His most unsettling argument concerns what both armies are learning. Snyder describes Ukraine and Russia as the world’s two genuinely modern armies, shaped by years of combat in which drones, electronic warfare, battlefield surveillance and rapid technological adaptation have become central to survival. Ukrainians innovate, he argues, and Russian forces study those innovations before reproducing them at scale a few months later. Meanwhile, Snyder considers much of the American military’s approach to warfare increasingly outdated compared with what is happening on Ukraine’s battlefields. That creates a dangerous paradox for the West. Every additional month of fighting gives Russia more experience with the tactics and technologies that could shape future conflicts. Even if Moscow fails to achieve its objectives in Ukraine, its armed forces are learning from an exceptionally demanding battlefield. Snyder also believes Ukraine’s long-range drone campaign is changing the political calculations inside Russia. For years, the Kremlin tried to wage a war that ordinary Russians could largely experience as spectators. Contract soldiers, financial incentives and recruitment from poorer regions helped limit the need for a broader mobilization. Ukrainian strikes on refineries, industrial facilities and other infrastructure are making that separation harder to maintain. Snyder argues that Russia may now need to mobilize additional personnel rather than continue relying primarily on paid volunteers. He suspects Moscow is increasingly interested in ending the war by spring, although that remains his forecast rather than an established Kremlin decision. He also credits the European Union with providing more assistance to Ukraine than any individual country, describing its response as surprisingly flexible for an institution so often associated with bureaucracy. His broader assessment contains both reassurance and a warning. Ukraine, in Snyder’s view, is proving far more resilient on the battlefield than many outside observers assume. Russia has not secured the decisive victory it sought, and sustaining its offensive is becoming increasingly costly. But the longer the fighting continues, the more Russia can destroy Ukraine’s economic foundations while adapting its own military to a new era of warfare. A Russian breakthrough may be unlikely in Snyder’s assessment. That does not mean the consequences of allowing the war to continue are becoming any less dangerous.

🇺🇦🇷🇺 SNYDER SAYS RUSSIA IS STRUGGLING AT THE FRONT BUT LEARNING HOW TO FIGHT A MORE DANGEROUS WAR Historian Timothy Snyder has returned from Ukraine’s front lines with an assessment that challenges much of the pessimism surrounding the war: he believes a major Russian breakthrough is unlikely, Ukrainian forces are inflicting substantially greater casualties, and Moscow may be approaching the limits of its ability to recruit soldiers without another mobilization. Snyder says Ukrainian forces are gaining more territory than they lose and imposing disproportionate losses on Russian troops. These are his assessments of the battlefield, not independently established figures for the entire front. But he also warns that Russia has developed a different advantage, one that reaches far beyond the trenches. Russian attacks are systematically damaging Ukraine’s economy, destroying factories, mines, steelworks and the infrastructure people depend on for their livelihoods. Snyder believes Moscow has become more effective at this kind of destruction over the past six months. In other words, Russia may be struggling to achieve a decisive military breakthrough while still inflicting enormous economic damage on the country it is trying to subjugate. His most unsettling argument concerns what both armies are learning. Snyder describes Ukraine and Russia as the world’s two genuinely modern armies, shaped by years of combat in which drones, electronic warfare, battlefield surveillance and rapid technological adaptation have become central to survival. Ukrainians innovate, he argues, and Russian forces study those innovations before reproducing them at scale a few months later. Meanwhile, Snyder considers much of the American military’s approach to warfare increasingly outdated compared with what is happening on Ukraine’s battlefields. That creates a dangerous paradox for the West. Every additional month of fighting gives Russia more experience with the tactics and technologies that could shape future conflicts. Even if Moscow fails to achieve its objectives in Ukraine, its armed forces are learning from an exceptionally demanding battlefield. Snyder also believes Ukraine’s long-range drone campaign is changing the political calculations inside Russia. For years, the Kremlin tried to wage a war that ordinary Russians could largely experience as spectators. Contract soldiers, financial incentives and recruitment from poorer regions helped limit the need for a broader mobilization. Ukrainian strikes on refineries, industrial facilities and other infrastructure are making that separation harder to maintain. Snyder argues that Russia may now need to mobilize additional personnel rather than continue relying primarily on paid volunteers. He suspects Moscow is increasingly interested in ending the war by spring, although that remains his forecast rather than an established Kremlin decision. He also credits the European Union with providing more assistance to Ukraine than any individual country, describing its response as surprisingly flexible for an institution so often associated with bureaucracy. His broader assessment contains both reassurance and a warning. Ukraine, in Snyder’s view, is proving far more resilient on the battlefield than many outside observers assume. Russia has not secured the decisive victory it sought, and sustaining its offensive is becoming increasingly costly. But the longer the fighting continues, the more Russia can destroy Ukraine’s economic foundations while adapting its own military to a new era of warfare. A Russian breakthrough may be unlikely in Snyder’s assessment. That does not mean the consequences of allowing the war to continue are becoming any less dangerous.

11,275 views • 1 day ago

LAVROV: UKRAINE IS “GETTING IN THE WAY” OF U.S.-RUSSIA RELATIONS 🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦 Russian 🇷🇺 Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov says Moscow wants the war in Ukraine 🇺🇦 removed as an obstacle to rebuilding ties with the United States 🇺🇸. “We have to remove the Ukraine issue from the road, because it is getting in the way of our path toward mutually beneficial Russian-American relations.” The wording is revealing: Lavrov presents Ukraine not as an independent country fighting a Russian invasion, but as a problem obstructing a broader relationship Moscow wants with Washington. For the Kremlin, the message is clear: normalize relations with Russia, and deal with Ukraine as the obstacle in between.

LAVROV: UKRAINE IS “GETTING IN THE WAY” OF U.S.-RUSSIA RELATIONS 🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦 Russian 🇷🇺 Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov says Moscow wants the war in Ukraine 🇺🇦 removed as an obstacle to rebuilding ties with the United States 🇺🇸. “We have to remove the Ukraine issue from the road, because it is getting in the way of our path toward mutually beneficial Russian-American relations.” The wording is revealing: Lavrov presents Ukraine not as an independent country fighting a Russian invasion, but as a problem obstructing a broader relationship Moscow wants with Washington. For the Kremlin, the message is clear: normalize relations with Russia, and deal with Ukraine as the obstacle in between.

124,769 views • 26 days ago

🇺🇦🇷🇺 ZELENSKYY WARNS MOSCOW: CONTINUE THE WAR AND THE COST COMES HOME Zelenskyy says Ukraine will not absorb Russian attacks indefinitely without answering deeper inside Russia if Putin refuses to end the war. “If Putin does not want to end this war and wishes to continue it, we will not sit quietly. We will respond.” He then delivered the warning in its starkest form: “If Ukraine burns, your Moscow will burn too.” The message is aimed directly at the Kremlin: continuing the war, in Zelenskyy’s formulation, means accepting that its consequences will increasingly reach Russia itself.

🇺🇦🇷🇺 ZELENSKYY WARNS MOSCOW: CONTINUE THE WAR AND THE COST COMES HOME Zelenskyy says Ukraine will not absorb Russian attacks indefinitely without answering deeper inside Russia if Putin refuses to end the war. “If Putin does not want to end this war and wishes to continue it, we will not sit quietly. We will respond.” He then delivered the warning in its starkest form: “If Ukraine burns, your Moscow will burn too.” The message is aimed directly at the Kremlin: continuing the war, in Zelenskyy’s formulation, means accepting that its consequences will increasingly reach Russia itself.

141,784 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇦🇷🇺 DROP AND GO Russian BMP crew unloads two soldiers on foot and pulls away toward the rear leaving them to move forward alone 2023 colorized

🇺🇦🇷🇺 DROP AND GO Russian BMP crew unloads two soldiers on foot and pulls away toward the rear leaving them to move forward alone 2023 colorized

777,518 views • 6 months ago

RUSSIA HAS LOST UP TO 1.4 MILLION TROOPS AND STILL CAN’T DEFEAT UKRAINE, KELLOGG SAYS 🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸 Keith Kellogg has delivered a devastating assessment of Russia’s invasion, arguing that Moscow has sacrificed an extraordinary number of soldiers for minimal territorial gains and that Putin should finally recognise the limits of what his army can achieve. According to Kellogg, Russian forces have suffered between 1.2 million and 1.4 million killed or wounded since the invasion began, figures he considers conservative. Despite those staggering losses, Kellogg insists that Russia is not winning. He argues that, beyond the territory seized during the initial invasion across Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Moscow has gained only approximately 1% of Ukraine’s territory, excluding Crimea. Ukrainian counterattacks have further complicated Russian efforts to consolidate their advances. His message to Putin is blunt: accept that the military campaign has reached its limits, declare victory domestically and end the fighting. “Just declare victory, go home, call it a day.” Kellogg also addressed Moscow’s demand that Ukraine surrender the remaining Ukrainian-controlled territory in Donetsk, explaining why Zelenskyy refuses to accept it. Having personally visited the area, Kellogg described its fortified positions as Ukraine’s last major defensive terrain protecting approaches toward Kharkiv and Kyiv. Three heavily fortified Ukrainian cities form part of that defensive system, making the territory strategically important far beyond its geographical size. Surrendering those positions would mean abandoning defensive infrastructure that Ukrainian forces have spent years protecting and potentially exposing other areas to future Russian attacks. Kellogg’s casualty estimates and territorial calculations are his assessments, rather than independently established totals. His central argument, however, is that Russia’s enormous losses have not translated into the decisive military victory Putin sought. After years of fighting and up to 1.4 million Russian casualties, Kellogg says Moscow still cannot force Ukraine to surrender Donetsk.

RUSSIA HAS LOST UP TO 1.4 MILLION TROOPS AND STILL CAN’T DEFEAT UKRAINE, KELLOGG SAYS 🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸 Keith Kellogg has delivered a devastating assessment of Russia’s invasion, arguing that Moscow has sacrificed an extraordinary number of soldiers for minimal territorial gains and that Putin should finally recognise the limits of what his army can achieve. According to Kellogg, Russian forces have suffered between 1.2 million and 1.4 million killed or wounded since the invasion began, figures he considers conservative. Despite those staggering losses, Kellogg insists that Russia is not winning. He argues that, beyond the territory seized during the initial invasion across Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Moscow has gained only approximately 1% of Ukraine’s territory, excluding Crimea. Ukrainian counterattacks have further complicated Russian efforts to consolidate their advances. His message to Putin is blunt: accept that the military campaign has reached its limits, declare victory domestically and end the fighting. “Just declare victory, go home, call it a day.” Kellogg also addressed Moscow’s demand that Ukraine surrender the remaining Ukrainian-controlled territory in Donetsk, explaining why Zelenskyy refuses to accept it. Having personally visited the area, Kellogg described its fortified positions as Ukraine’s last major defensive terrain protecting approaches toward Kharkiv and Kyiv. Three heavily fortified Ukrainian cities form part of that defensive system, making the territory strategically important far beyond its geographical size. Surrendering those positions would mean abandoning defensive infrastructure that Ukrainian forces have spent years protecting and potentially exposing other areas to future Russian attacks. Kellogg’s casualty estimates and territorial calculations are his assessments, rather than independently established totals. His central argument, however, is that Russia’s enormous losses have not translated into the decisive military victory Putin sought. After years of fighting and up to 1.4 million Russian casualties, Kellogg says Moscow still cannot force Ukraine to surrender Donetsk.

17,391 views • 4 days ago

🇺🇦🇷🇺 BUDANOV: THE ERA OF WARNING RUSSIA IS OVER Kyrylo Budanov says Ukraine intends to keep striking Russian military infrastructure wherever it can reach it. According to him, Ukrainian intelligence already knows the locations of Russia’s military facilities, bases and launch sites, and those targets will remain under pressure using every available means. “Strikes on enemy territory will continue.” His second line was even more revealing: “The days of diplomatic romanticism are over.” The message to Moscow is unmistakable: Ukraine is no longer treating Russia’s rear as a sanctuary while Russian forces continue attacking Ukrainian territory.

🇺🇦🇷🇺 BUDANOV: THE ERA OF WARNING RUSSIA IS OVER Kyrylo Budanov says Ukraine intends to keep striking Russian military infrastructure wherever it can reach it. According to him, Ukrainian intelligence already knows the locations of Russia’s military facilities, bases and launch sites, and those targets will remain under pressure using every available means. “Strikes on enemy territory will continue.” His second line was even more revealing: “The days of diplomatic romanticism are over.” The message to Moscow is unmistakable: Ukraine is no longer treating Russia’s rear as a sanctuary while Russian forces continue attacking Ukrainian territory.

103,880 views • 1 month ago

RUSSIAN OCCUPIERS WILL FIND NO PEACE ON UKRAINIAN SOIL 🇺🇦🇷🇺 As long as Russian forces continue occupying Ukrainian territory, they will face resistance from the people defending their homeland. Every kilometre of occupied land remains contested. Every Russian attempt to consolidate its positions faces the determination of Ukrainian defenders who refuse to surrender their country. Moscow may claim Ukrainian territory as its own, but those claims do not change internationally recognised borders. Russia started this invasion. Ukraine continues to fight for its freedom. And the resistance is far from over. More to come. 🇺🇦

Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

RUSSIAN OCCUPIERS WILL FIND NO PEACE ON UKRAINIAN SOIL 🇺🇦🇷🇺 As long as Russian forces continue occupying Ukrainian territory, they will face resistance from the people defending their homeland. Every kilometre of occupied land remains contested. Every Russian attempt to consolidate its positions faces the determination of Ukrainian defenders who refuse to surrender their country. Moscow may claim Ukrainian territory as its own, but those claims do not change internationally recognised borders. Russia started this invasion. Ukraine continues to fight for its freedom. And the resistance is far from over. More to come. 🇺🇦

17,227 views • 5 days ago

🇺🇦🇷🇺 CONCEALMENT FAILED THE RUSSIAN AIR-DEFENCE OPERATOR A Russian air-defence soldier armed with an Igla MANPADS apparently believed his position was hidden. Ukrainian reconnaissance detected him anyway and neutralized the threat before it could target Ukrainian aircraft.

🇺🇦🇷🇺 CONCEALMENT FAILED THE RUSSIAN AIR-DEFENCE OPERATOR A Russian air-defence soldier armed with an Igla MANPADS apparently believed his position was hidden. Ukrainian reconnaissance detected him anyway and neutralized the threat before it could target Ukrainian aircraft.

304,193 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇦🇷🇺 Extremely powerful footage from the archives. A Ukrainian FPV operator chose not to strike an unarmed Russian soldier left behind by his own side, instead sending water and instructions to surrender, that kind of decision in the middle of war says a lot about discipline and control This is peak humanity.

Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

🇺🇦🇷🇺 Extremely powerful footage from the archives. A Ukrainian FPV operator chose not to strike an unarmed Russian soldier left behind by his own side, instead sending water and instructions to surrender, that kind of decision in the middle of war says a lot about discipline and control This is peak humanity.

396,603 views • 6 months ago

🇷🇺🇺🇦 PUTIN DENIES STARTING THE WAR RUSSIA LAUNCHED Vladimir Putin 🇷🇺 - "We did not initiate hostilities by launching the special military operation." Putin is once again trying to rewrite the most basic fact of this war: Russia crossed Ukraine’s border, invaded Ukrainian territory and started the largest war in Europe since World War II. This was not self-defence. It was aggression dressed up as propaganda, and Moscow is still trying to make the victim responsible for the invasion carried out by the aggressor.

🇷🇺🇺🇦 PUTIN DENIES STARTING THE WAR RUSSIA LAUNCHED Vladimir Putin 🇷🇺 - "We did not initiate hostilities by launching the special military operation." Putin is once again trying to rewrite the most basic fact of this war: Russia crossed Ukraine’s border, invaded Ukrainian territory and started the largest war in Europe since World War II. This was not self-defence. It was aggression dressed up as propaganda, and Moscow is still trying to make the victim responsible for the invasion carried out by the aggressor.

254,658 views • 3 months ago

🇺🇦🇷🇺 FEDOROV ON PUTIN’S MISSILE LIMITS "Russia launched 30 ballistic missiles at Kyiv just days ago. That is the maximum Putin can show. He cannot advance on the battlefield and achieve his goals with Shaheds or cruise missiles. So he fires everything at civilians and calls it strength." - Mykhailo Fedorov 🇺🇦 When the battlefield does not give Moscow victory, the Kremlin tries to manufacture fear from the sky. That is not strength. It is frustration with a missile trail.

🇺🇦🇷🇺 FEDOROV ON PUTIN’S MISSILE LIMITS "Russia launched 30 ballistic missiles at Kyiv just days ago. That is the maximum Putin can show. He cannot advance on the battlefield and achieve his goals with Shaheds or cruise missiles. So he fires everything at civilians and calls it strength." - Mykhailo Fedorov 🇺🇦 When the battlefield does not give Moscow victory, the Kremlin tries to manufacture fear from the sky. That is not strength. It is frustration with a missile trail.

266,627 views • 4 months ago

RUSSIA'S DIGITAL NIGHTMARE GETS WORSE AS UKRAINE DEFIES WASHINGTON 🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸 Russia is reportedly discovering just how much of everyday life depends on infrastructure that Ukrainian drones can reach. According to an October 13 account by Prof. Bonk, three Yandex data centers were struck within four days, triggering widespread service disruptions, inaccessible digital wallets, banking problems and failures affecting the company's AI-powered services. Ukrainian drone manufacturer Fire Point apparently couldn't resist commenting beneath an apology from Yandex's CEO: "Dima, have you tried turning it off and on again?" The fallout was both absurd and genuinely disruptive. RT chief Margarita Simonyan reportedly found herself declaring, "I am not a robot!" Russian military blogger Fighterbomber lamented losing access to the Alice voice assistant, asking, "How to go on living..." Meanwhile, a woman named Anna in Yekaterinburg reportedly spent six hours trying unsuccessfully to arrange food for her immobile grandmother. Ordinary Russians were struggling with basic transactions while Yandex issued repeated apologies without providing a clear recovery date. Against this backdrop, Moscow's political messaging became even stranger. Putin's envoy reportedly celebrated Trump's criticism of Zelenskyy as "iconic and historic" while floating the idea of a tunnel beneath the Bering Strait, built by Elon Musk's Boring Company, to connect Russia and the United States. But the much bigger confrontation was unfolding over Russian energy infrastructure. The account alleges that Washington pressured Kyiv to stop attacking Russian oil refineries, with Trump reportedly telling the Ukrainians: "You can do whatever you want to Russia; don't hit refineries." A proposed reciprocal arrangement would have restricted refinery strikes by both countries. The problem, as described in the thread, was the enormous asymmetry: Ukraine's single refinery had already been bombed by Russia, while Moscow retained dozens of facilities. Kyiv would effectively be surrendering an important instrument of economic pressure in exchange for a concession offering comparatively little. Russian military commentators reportedly recognized the imbalance immediately. Fighterbomber mocked Trump with the nickname "Trumpampamushka" and questioned why Moscow would voluntarily accept restrictions on attacks against its energy sector when Ukrainian strikes were already causing serious problems. Meanwhile, accounts from the battlefield painted a bleak picture for Russian forces. The thread attributed 50,000 Russian casualties in September, including 28,000 killed, to NATO, although those figures were not independently established in the material provided. Russian military bloggers described assaults being stopped by dense concentrations of Ukrainian drones, difficult conditions in wooded areas and growing frustration over the inability to sustain advances. Some Russian commentators reportedly dismissed claims of a major Ukrainian encirclement near Kharkiv as "the biggest lie of the war." Another military mapping channel described a position as impossible to abandon while simultaneously characterizing the situation as exceptionally dangerous. In Zaporizhzhia, the thread alleged that Russia's 10th Spetsnaz Brigade had suffered 448 killed and 85 captured, figures that likewise remain unverified here. Russian frontline personnel were reportedly crowdfunding basic drones as public interest in supporting the war diminished. One Ukrainian unit, describing a strike on a Russian supply depot, offered a particularly dry account: "The drone hit a fuel barrel, and the rest burned merrily on its own." Then came Kyiv's reported answer to Washington. A senior Ukrainian official told the Financial Times: "We will burn refineries." According to the same account, an oil terminal in Rostov was burning that night. And amid the military losses, refinery attacks, political maneuvering and digital chaos, Russia's troubles produced one particularly fitting image: the company whose services millions rely upon was still trying to explain when everything might start working again.

RUSSIA'S DIGITAL NIGHTMARE GETS WORSE AS UKRAINE DEFIES WASHINGTON 🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸 Russia is reportedly discovering just how much of everyday life depends on infrastructure that Ukrainian drones can reach. According to an October 13 account by Prof. Bonk, three Yandex data centers were struck within four days, triggering widespread service disruptions, inaccessible digital wallets, banking problems and failures affecting the company's AI-powered services. Ukrainian drone manufacturer Fire Point apparently couldn't resist commenting beneath an apology from Yandex's CEO: "Dima, have you tried turning it off and on again?" The fallout was both absurd and genuinely disruptive. RT chief Margarita Simonyan reportedly found herself declaring, "I am not a robot!" Russian military blogger Fighterbomber lamented losing access to the Alice voice assistant, asking, "How to go on living..." Meanwhile, a woman named Anna in Yekaterinburg reportedly spent six hours trying unsuccessfully to arrange food for her immobile grandmother. Ordinary Russians were struggling with basic transactions while Yandex issued repeated apologies without providing a clear recovery date. Against this backdrop, Moscow's political messaging became even stranger. Putin's envoy reportedly celebrated Trump's criticism of Zelenskyy as "iconic and historic" while floating the idea of a tunnel beneath the Bering Strait, built by Elon Musk's Boring Company, to connect Russia and the United States. But the much bigger confrontation was unfolding over Russian energy infrastructure. The account alleges that Washington pressured Kyiv to stop attacking Russian oil refineries, with Trump reportedly telling the Ukrainians: "You can do whatever you want to Russia; don't hit refineries." A proposed reciprocal arrangement would have restricted refinery strikes by both countries. The problem, as described in the thread, was the enormous asymmetry: Ukraine's single refinery had already been bombed by Russia, while Moscow retained dozens of facilities. Kyiv would effectively be surrendering an important instrument of economic pressure in exchange for a concession offering comparatively little. Russian military commentators reportedly recognized the imbalance immediately. Fighterbomber mocked Trump with the nickname "Trumpampamushka" and questioned why Moscow would voluntarily accept restrictions on attacks against its energy sector when Ukrainian strikes were already causing serious problems. Meanwhile, accounts from the battlefield painted a bleak picture for Russian forces. The thread attributed 50,000 Russian casualties in September, including 28,000 killed, to NATO, although those figures were not independently established in the material provided. Russian military bloggers described assaults being stopped by dense concentrations of Ukrainian drones, difficult conditions in wooded areas and growing frustration over the inability to sustain advances. Some Russian commentators reportedly dismissed claims of a major Ukrainian encirclement near Kharkiv as "the biggest lie of the war." Another military mapping channel described a position as impossible to abandon while simultaneously characterizing the situation as exceptionally dangerous. In Zaporizhzhia, the thread alleged that Russia's 10th Spetsnaz Brigade had suffered 448 killed and 85 captured, figures that likewise remain unverified here. Russian frontline personnel were reportedly crowdfunding basic drones as public interest in supporting the war diminished. One Ukrainian unit, describing a strike on a Russian supply depot, offered a particularly dry account: "The drone hit a fuel barrel, and the rest burned merrily on its own." Then came Kyiv's reported answer to Washington. A senior Ukrainian official told the Financial Times: "We will burn refineries." According to the same account, an oil terminal in Rostov was burning that night. And amid the military losses, refinery attacks, political maneuvering and digital chaos, Russia's troubles produced one particularly fitting image: the company whose services millions rely upon was still trying to explain when everything might start working again.

29,973 views • 13 days ago

RUSSIAN TROOPS ARE BEING FED INTO THE SAME POSITIONS AGAIN AND AGAIN 🇷🇺🇺🇦 A Ukrainian commander known as “Rys” describes a brutal pattern on the front: Russian 🇷🇺 troops holding every strongpoint, village, farmstead and cellar because retreat can be as dangerous as advancing. “Coming at us means death or captivity. We offer every one of them the chance to surrender.” But according to Rys, many refuse even when surrender is offered. He says Russian propaganda has convinced soldiers that Ukrainian 🇺🇦 captivity means torture, gas chambers or mutilation, leaving some so terrified that they would rather die than give themselves up. The result is a grinding cycle. “Every day the Russians bring 8 to 10 men into the same tree line. It is just 100 m further on. Our infantry clears it again and must pull back to rest.” Then another group arrives. That, Rys says, is how Russia slows Ukrainian advances: constantly refilling the same contested positions with small groups of men. “They spend people like candy wrappers. It is as if they print them on printers.” The terrain barely moves, but the human cost keeps rising.

RUSSIAN TROOPS ARE BEING FED INTO THE SAME POSITIONS AGAIN AND AGAIN 🇷🇺🇺🇦 A Ukrainian commander known as “Rys” describes a brutal pattern on the front: Russian 🇷🇺 troops holding every strongpoint, village, farmstead and cellar because retreat can be as dangerous as advancing. “Coming at us means death or captivity. We offer every one of them the chance to surrender.” But according to Rys, many refuse even when surrender is offered. He says Russian propaganda has convinced soldiers that Ukrainian 🇺🇦 captivity means torture, gas chambers or mutilation, leaving some so terrified that they would rather die than give themselves up. The result is a grinding cycle. “Every day the Russians bring 8 to 10 men into the same tree line. It is just 100 m further on. Our infantry clears it again and must pull back to rest.” Then another group arrives. That, Rys says, is how Russia slows Ukrainian advances: constantly refilling the same contested positions with small groups of men. “They spend people like candy wrappers. It is as if they print them on printers.” The terrain barely moves, but the human cost keeps rising.

37,598 views • 19 days ago

🇷🇺🇺🇦 FORMER RUSSIAN SPY EXPLAINS THE WAR TOO HONESTLY “We’re a thorn in their side. We’re changing the system in which they live very comfortably. Why would they need us?” - Andrey Bezrukov 🇷🇺 Former Russian spy Andrey Bezrukov just said the quiet part out loud: Ukraine is not the threat because it attacked Russia. Ukraine is the threat because it proves a different future is possible next door. That is what Moscow fears most, not NATO slogans, not imaginary Nazis, not propaganda fantasies. A free Ukraine makes Russia’s prison of a system look exactly like what it is. Natalka

🇷🇺🇺🇦 FORMER RUSSIAN SPY EXPLAINS THE WAR TOO HONESTLY “We’re a thorn in their side. We’re changing the system in which they live very comfortably. Why would they need us?” - Andrey Bezrukov 🇷🇺 Former Russian spy Andrey Bezrukov just said the quiet part out loud: Ukraine is not the threat because it attacked Russia. Ukraine is the threat because it proves a different future is possible next door. That is what Moscow fears most, not NATO slogans, not imaginary Nazis, not propaganda fantasies. A free Ukraine makes Russia’s prison of a system look exactly like what it is. Natalka

199,102 views • 4 months ago

🇷🇺🇨🇳🇺🇦🇺🇸 KASPAROV SAYS CHINA WANTS PUTIN’S WAR TO CONTINUE Garry Kasparov 🇷🇺 - "This is a global war. China stands behind Putin and wants the conflict to continue because it weakens the West, drives a wedge between America and Europe, and drains Russia." Kasparov’s point is that Russia’s war against Ukraine is no longer just a European battlefield. It is part of a wider contest where Beijing benefits from Moscow bleeding itself while the West is forced to spend political, military and economic capital. For China, a weakened Russia is useful, a divided West is useful, and a long war that tests American and European unity is useful. That is why helping Ukraine win is not only a Ukraine policy. It is a global security policy.

🇷🇺🇨🇳🇺🇦🇺🇸 KASPAROV SAYS CHINA WANTS PUTIN’S WAR TO CONTINUE Garry Kasparov 🇷🇺 - "This is a global war. China stands behind Putin and wants the conflict to continue because it weakens the West, drives a wedge between America and Europe, and drains Russia." Kasparov’s point is that Russia’s war against Ukraine is no longer just a European battlefield. It is part of a wider contest where Beijing benefits from Moscow bleeding itself while the West is forced to spend political, military and economic capital. For China, a weakened Russia is useful, a divided West is useful, and a long war that tests American and European unity is useful. That is why helping Ukraine win is not only a Ukraine policy. It is a global security policy.

161,355 views • 3 months ago

TWO PRESIDENTS, TWO VERY DIFFERENT MOMENTS WITH AMERICAN WAR HEROES 🇺🇦🇺🇸🇫🇷 When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met Melvin Hurwitz, an American World War II veteran, the elderly soldier reached for his hand and attempted to kiss it. Zelenskyy gently pulled his hand away, lowered himself to the veteran’s level and embraced him instead. What followed was a deeply moving exchange. Veteran: “You’re the savior of the people!” Zelenskyy: “No, no, no. You saved Europe.” Veteran: “You bring tears to my eyes. You are my hero.” Zelenskyy: “No, no, you are our hero.” Veteran: “I pray for you.” The encounter offers a contrast with controversies surrounding Donald Trump’s remarks and treatment of American military service members. During a 2018 visit to France marking the centenary of the end of World War I, Trump cancelled a planned visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery, where 2,289 American military personnel are buried. According to accounts published by The Atlantic, Trump privately questioned why he should visit a cemetery filled with “losers” and referred to fallen Marines at Belleau Wood as “suckers.” Trump has denied making those remarks. The soldiers who died at Belleau Wood were fighting Germany in World War I, not the Nazi regime of World War II. In 2024, Trump also attracted criticism for comparing the Presidential Medal of Freedom with the Medal of Honor. He called the civilian decoration “much better” while noting that Medal of Honor recipients are often severely wounded or awarded the distinction posthumously. In 2025, Trump was criticised for playing golf in Florida rather than attending a dignified transfer ceremony for four fallen American service members, although presidential attendance at such ceremonies is not mandatory. Zelenskyy’s exchange with Hurwitz was a simple moment of mutual respect between two men from different generations, both shaped by wars in Europe. Neither wanted to be called a hero. Each insisted that the other deserved the honour.

TWO PRESIDENTS, TWO VERY DIFFERENT MOMENTS WITH AMERICAN WAR HEROES 🇺🇦🇺🇸🇫🇷 When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met Melvin Hurwitz, an American World War II veteran, the elderly soldier reached for his hand and attempted to kiss it. Zelenskyy gently pulled his hand away, lowered himself to the veteran’s level and embraced him instead. What followed was a deeply moving exchange. Veteran: “You’re the savior of the people!” Zelenskyy: “No, no, no. You saved Europe.” Veteran: “You bring tears to my eyes. You are my hero.” Zelenskyy: “No, no, you are our hero.” Veteran: “I pray for you.” The encounter offers a contrast with controversies surrounding Donald Trump’s remarks and treatment of American military service members. During a 2018 visit to France marking the centenary of the end of World War I, Trump cancelled a planned visit to the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery, where 2,289 American military personnel are buried. According to accounts published by The Atlantic, Trump privately questioned why he should visit a cemetery filled with “losers” and referred to fallen Marines at Belleau Wood as “suckers.” Trump has denied making those remarks. The soldiers who died at Belleau Wood were fighting Germany in World War I, not the Nazi regime of World War II. In 2024, Trump also attracted criticism for comparing the Presidential Medal of Freedom with the Medal of Honor. He called the civilian decoration “much better” while noting that Medal of Honor recipients are often severely wounded or awarded the distinction posthumously. In 2025, Trump was criticised for playing golf in Florida rather than attending a dignified transfer ceremony for four fallen American service members, although presidential attendance at such ceremonies is not mandatory. Zelenskyy’s exchange with Hurwitz was a simple moment of mutual respect between two men from different generations, both shaped by wars in Europe. Neither wanted to be called a hero. Each insisted that the other deserved the honour.

14,652 views • 8 days ago