⚠️ Content Warning ⚠️ H-group re-establishes justice and law... after ceasefire Traitors who helped Israel during G-cide or used food for profit during famine were given Justice Warning to any traitors or Z collaborators! 🫡 Unity for Victory!show more

During the Gwadar Baloch Raji Muchi 2024, Baloch women... police officers were harassed by BYC goons at Marine Time while dutifully following instructions of BYC leadership. Today, justice has finally been served to them. Hearts across Balochistan are swelling with pride for our brave women in uniform and for the rule of law that protects them. This is a victory for every resident who wants peace and security in our province.show more

One of the accused killed himself in 2019. Thanks... to the witch hunting of the media and the star Anchors for labeling Muslims Traitors or Terrorists. This is how angry Rubika Liyaquat was during the debate when there were sedition charges against 19 Tribal Muslims for raising 'Pakistan Zindabad' slogans and celebrating Pakistan's win against India. The case went on for 6 years. Now The MP court found the case was fabricated after the Hindu complainant and government witnesses said the police forced them to make false statements against Tribal Muslims arrested.show more

One of the accused killed himself in 2019. Thanks... to the witch hunting of the media and the star Anchors for labeling Muslims Traitors or Terrorists. This is how angry Rubika Liyaquat was during the debate when there were sedition charges against 19 Tribal Muslims for raising 'Pakistan Zindabad' slogans and celebrating Pakistan's win against India. The case went on for 6 years. Now The MP court found the case was fabricated after the Hindu complainant and government witnesses said the police forced them to make false statements against Tribal Muslims arrested.show more

Tension erupted in Karnaprayag after a dispute between Sikh... pilgrims and hotel staff reportedly escalated into a violent clash. Several locals, including a hotel employee, were injured in the incident, in which sharp-edged weapons were used during the altercation. The incident triggered protests by residents, who blocked the Badrinath National Highway and demanded strict action against those responsible. Police and administrative teams reached the spot, shifted the injured to a hospital for treatment, and launched an investigation. The situation remains tense, with locals warning of further agitation if swift action is not taken.show more

Was there any direct Iranian missile hits inside "Israel"?... Here are the facts based on the available information: Iranians say two objectives were targeted successfully. Israelis say there was no serious damage, and all of them were intercepted except for a few that caused no or little damage. The settlers were not sharing any videos during the attack, as it seems there was a warning against that. The vast majority of videos came out from Palestinians who live in the occupied land. Most of the UAVs and some missiles were intercepted outside the "Israeli" airspace. Significant number of the interceptions were done in the airspace of Jordan. There are two pieces of evidence that supports the Iranian claims: the two videos showing ballistic missiles hitting the Israeli military airbase in Negev from two different angles. And both videos were shot by Palestinians who live in the occupied territories of Negev.show more

During a video statement earlier today about how yesterday’s... strikes against Hamas leaders in the Qatari capital of Doha was similar to strikes that the United States carried out against Al-Qaeda after 9/11, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated, “I say to Qatar and all nations who harbor terrorists, you either expel them or bring them to justice, cause if you don’t we will.” This follows a statement yesterday by U.S. President Donald J. Trump to the Emir of Qatar, in which he assured him that he would not allow any further attacks by Israel against the territory of Qatar.show more

🚨 DOUBLE STANDARD: Why hasn’t the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE... taken action against CARDI B for SEX CRIMES, ROBBERY, AND DRUGGING MEN? On March 26, 2019, rapper Cardi B (Cardi B) whose real name is Belcalis Marlenis Almánzar, PUBLICLY BOASTED ON SOCIAL MEDIA about USING SEX to DRUG and ROB MEN, taking all of their money. She stated, “N-Words must have forgot what I did… Oh yeah, you wanna fu*k me? Yeah, yeah, yeah, let’s go to this hotel, and I drugged N-Words up, and I robbed them. That’s what I used to do.” Then, on August 9, 2024, during an X Space, Cardi B reaffirmed her lack of remorse, proudly stating she would repeat these actions. She said, “Why do y’all keep writing ‘Cardi B drugged men for? So what, I’ll do it again bi^ch. I don’t feel bad for no N-Words, and I’ll do it the f^*k again.” These incidents, which Cardi B has openly admitted to, allegedly took place in New York. The pressing question remains: why hasn’t Cardi B been charged with sex crimes and drug-related offenses? Why does the justice system seem to treat non-Black women offenders differently? Despite her public confessions, #CardiB appears to have avoided any legal consequences, by The NYPD (NYPD NEWS) and THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT (U.S. Department of Justice) or the FBI (FBI New York) sparking significant concerns about unequal justice. Would a Black woman be afforded the same leniency if she admitted to the same actions? Why does Cardi B seem above the law? She’s no different than R Kelly, Diddy, Bill Cosby, Rick Ross, Jeffery Epstein or Harvey Weinstein. How is Cardi B still allowed to be played on radio stations, featured on TV shows, perform live in venues across America, and retain her endorsement deals and contracts?show more

The Awami League government never obstructed BNP activists going... to pay tribute to General Zia’s grave. Never obstructed any peaceful gathering or peaceful protest. Only when a protest starts getting violent, roads are blocked, and attacks are coming from the protesters do the law enforcement agencies act in self-defense and to defuse tension to protect peace. Having said that, I don’t want to claim that the law enforcement members never behaved unlawfully on the ground, etc., but they were never instructed to do so. But we were always blamed for not honoring the right to assembly, protest, etc. Even if I accept all the blames to be true for the arguments sake, what had happened today was unprecedented; something like this never happened during AL’s last 15 and a half years. The goons intimidated, suppressed, and assaulted the people who were going to Dhanmomdi 32 for doing no protest, for making no demand to the government, and for no violence from their side. They were going just to mourn and show tribute to Bangabandhu. The goons under the cover of ‘students & people’ were unleashed to attack and harass Awami League activists and many general people around the area of Dhanmomdi 32. #Attack on #Freedomshow more

These are images of the Fuzzy Wuzzy Angels. It... was the racially coded and historically complex name given by Australian soldiers to the indigenous Papua New Guineans who served as wartime carriers and stretcher-bearers during the grueling 1942 Kokoda Campaign of World War II. "Fuzzy-Wuzzy" was originally used by British soldiers in the 19th century as a name for Hadendoa warriors on the Red Sea coast of the Sudan, and referred to their elaborate butter-matted hairstyles. Under the Australian military government in New Guinea, many of the Papua New Guinean workers were conscripted into work to support the war effort, forced by Australian soldiers through threat of force or injury, or unfulfilled promises. Salute to them. ❤️show more

This is not Hiroshima. This is not Gaza. This... is not Lebanon. This is not Iran. This is Ukraine now… bombed with FAB-3000, a 3-ton bomb. Events that should not be publicized, yet must be highlighted. I remember when I sat alongside President Zelensky's representative during a closed-door diplomatic meeting under the mediation of the Turkish president aimed at encouraging Ukraine to resume the “Istanbul peace talks” with Russia. When we reached a critical juncture, the Ukrainian Deputy Foreign Minister asked a question while I was trying to persuade him to return to negotiations: "What if you were in my shoes—with your land occupied and your people killed every day, while Putin violates international law on a daily basis? Would you continue to fight and support the resistance, turn to negotiations, or surrender?” At that moment, I wanted to give him an answer based on a similar personal experience, not a diplomatic one; for I was thinking of Lebanon, where our people were being killed daily and our land was under occupation. I pointed out that Israel currently occupies and controls 10% of Lebanon (that was the figure at the time; it has since risen to 20%)—the same proportion that Russia occupies and controls of Ukraine. The World condemned Russia, but cannot condemn Israel! Ukraine itself sided with Israel, citing the right to self-defense! The issue was never occupation. It was the identity of the occupier. I mentioned that international law hasn’t failed in Ukraine or in Lebanon or in Gaza and beyond. This’s not the failure of the law. The law stands and its principles remain clear. The failure is our collective will to uphold it. And to put a punishment for those who violate the international law. International law is not optional that you invoke only when it suits you. Double standards in international law—and the weaponization of that law to serve national interests—have led to a situation where international law is no longer respected. War crimes beget war crimes—When the international community failed to bring one state to justice for violating the international law, they knew they can do it again, and another state will inevitably follow suit with impunity. I concluded by stating that I would shift the focus to human security rather than state security; however, negotiating human security requires a ceasefire first. Otherwise, it would be tantamount to surrender, allowing the other to impose its terms and forcing you to concede. International law must be the same for everyone everywhere, and no State above international law. If I criticize your side, you assume I'm on theirs. If I criticize their side, they assume I'm on yours. You are both wrong. My position is guided by principles and upholding the law rather than alignment. I am basically against anything that kills people or destroy the planet we live on. I belong neither to this side nor that; I belong to humanity and Earth.show more

The events surrounding Sandlana’s arrest reveal a man who... operates far beyond the reach of ordinary accountability. When law-enforcement attempted to execute a lawful warrant, they did not encounter a private citizen but a fortified power centre protected by armed guards, perimeter security, and crowds mobilised to resist the State. Officers were surrounded, shoved back, injured, and even dispossessed of an official firearm. That level of coordinated defiance reflects neither panic nor misunderstanding it reflects a command structure whose members respond to Sandlana with military-style discipline. Vusi Ndala’s own video and who is out on bail, in which he threatens that anyone seeking to arrest Sandlana must first arrest an entire council or congregation, confirms the existence of a machinery of intimidation deliberately engineered to shield him from accountability. Such conduct is irreconcilable with the conditions of bail and demonstrates the applicant’s capacity to raise organised resistance at any moment. The danger is heightened by the calculated manner in which the applicant and his associates sought to avoid arrest. When confronted with a lawful warrant, Sandlana denied being on the property, stalled for time, and used the presence of his followers to delay police operations for hours. His associates, including Ndala, have repeatedly fled to the same compound when facing arrest precisely because they know they will find protection behind loyal guards and mobilised crowds primed to obstruct law-enforcement. These are not the actions of individuals who respect legal authority; they reveal a belief that the law can be outnumbered, overwhelmed, or intimidated into retreat. Returning such an individual to the very environment that enabled this obstruction would invite further evasion, further mobilisation, and further destabilisation of State authority. Compounding these risks is the applicant’s demonstrated ability to manipulate, corrupt, or intimidate elements within the justice system itself. He has cultivated influence within judicial, legal, and administrative processes, enabling him to secure tactical advantages, distort proceedings, or weaponise courts against witnesses. His resources and network allow him not only to obstruct investigations on the ground but to interfere with institutional mechanisms from within. An individual capable of enticing or co-opting justice officials cannot be trusted to comply with bail conditions; instead, he will exploit release to tamper with evidence, intimidate witnesses, and strategically undermine the administration of justice. Beyond the physical and institutional threats lies a broader public risk. Granting bail to a person who can summon violent resistance, defy lawful arrest, and marshal crowds to confront police would signal that influence, intimidation, and power can override the law. At a time when public trust in the criminal justice system is already fragile, such a decision would deepen the perception that powerful individuals operate under different rules. Witnesses would be terrified, investigators discouraged, and the public disillusioned. Protecting the integrity of the justice system, safeguarding the safety of law-enforcement, and preserving public order all point to one unavoidable conclusion: Sandlana must not be granted bail. NPASouthAfrica The Presidency 🇿🇦 SA Police Service 🇿🇦show more

The Israel Hoax just dropped. Presidential candidate Donald Trump... is being investigated for the alleged "massive crime" of making an unsanctioned phone call to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. As reported by Axios, the former president spoke on the phone with Netanyahu to discuss the Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal, citing two U.S. sources who were briefed on the call. Donald Trump met with Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago in July. Netanyahu also met with President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris during his visit. According to Newsweek, if Trump did make the call, he would "potentially be breaking the law as the Logan Act, enacted in 1799," which "prohibits unauthorized private citizens from negotiating with foreign governments on behalf of the U.S." American Muckrakers filed a request with the Justice department and the State Department over Donald Trump's alleged call. Donald Trump's reported conversation with Netanyahu would be far from unusual, particularly for a former president or an ex-diplomat. In March 2024, former President Barack Obama paid a "surprise visit" to Downing Street in the United Kingdom to meet with then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. A British official told The Hill that Obama and Sunak discussed a variety of issues, including international affairs and artificial intelligence (AI). During the Trump administration, former Secretary of State John Kerry met with the Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif in meetings that critics say were intended to undermine sitting President Trump.show more

Charity powered by Web3SlashPlace People have lost everything and... are suffering from the horrible floods in Northern Thailand. 🆘 Andrew and his girlfriend went to the temple to donate food, water, clothes, etc. Once enough funds are raised Andrew plans on going directly to the northern Thai/Myanmar border to help the people suffering from the civil war in Myanmar and others suffering from the floods as well. 💚 During this evenings space we will have a discount on pixels for Web3SlashPlace where any amount of pixels purchased in SOL, ETH, and/or MATIC will be doubled! So for example, if you buy 100 pixels we will airdrop an additional 100 pixels to you manually after the space.▫️ 20% of all funds raised through Web3SlashPlace will go directly to people who need it most. We have ensured the donations today are going to those in need directly through a friend of ours who is doing more hands on work to help the tens of thousands of people (or more) effected by these floods. 🇹🇭show more

Israel's impunity must end. The UN charter stipulates that... all security council resolutions are legally binding under international law. One of the conditions of being accepted into the UN is that member states should adhere to UN resolutions. Any country that is no consistent and regular in not abiding by international law and UN resolutions, should indeed be expelled from the UN. Israel is the most flagrant abuser of UN resolutions, by far, as of 1948, Israel has disregarded roughly 450 to 550 United Nations General Assembly resolutions, has been the subject of more than 230 United Nations Security Council resolutions, rejected and failed to implement 32, and as of 2006, Israel had been condemned in 112 resolutions by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Since 1972, there have been 59 vetoes on Israel-related resolutions. It’s been 54 years from 1972 until that 59th veto in late 2025. That's basically once a year. Once a year for 54 years, the UN has asked about Israel and the security council has blocked it. Every single one of those Israel related resolutions was blocked by the United States. Since 2023, Israel has defied all UN Security Council resolutions on Gaza. The Security Council passed ceasefire resolutions and Israel disobey it. The International Court of Justice ordered Israel to stop preventing delivery of needed aid, and Israel disobey it. The Hague demanded this. Geneva demanded this. The human conscience demanded this. Yet Israel continues to disobey it. If the world is concerned in secret nuclear programs, there's a country that doesn't allow any IAEA inspectors, with a UN security council resolution 487 in 1981 says, "calls upon Israel urgently to place its nuclear facilities under the safeguards of the IAEA." Israel refuses. Israel behaves like a rogue state within the UN, yet its impunity has gone beyond mere violations of UN resolutions... Israel has killed—deliberately, in most—a record number of UN staff. Israel has murdered nearly 400 UN personnel—serving under the UN’s blue flag—since October 7, 2023, alone; roughly ten times higher than the UN casualties in all other global conflict zones combined over the same period.. For the first time in the history of the United Nations. Israel takeover of UN headquarters and raised Israeli flag over the buildings. Israel has attacked UN food distribution centers, shelled UN schools that people are using as a shelter, targeted UN convoys carrying Humanitarian aid workers heading to starving children. Israel has also targeted medical supplies warehouse and hospitals, and bombarded UN facilities; at least 420 distinct UN installations have been directly hit, damaged, or occupied by Israel across Palestine and Lebanon, since October 7, 2023. To date, Israel has killed seven UN peacekeepers and wounded nearly a dozen others wearing UN uniform under serving under UN flag in Lebanon. Attacking UN peacekeepers is an abomination which was in the past perpetrated by terrorists, but never by members of the UN. Some of you pretended to care what the UN had to say in 1948; do you care that the UN of today has had more UN personnel killed in the last three years than have been killed or lost in any other single conflict or crisis in the entire 81-year history of the United Nations. Israel has violated international law, international humanitarian law, human rights law, the Geneva and Vienna Conventions, the International Criminal Court (ICC) and Rome Statute, the 1994 Convention, the UN Charter and Security Council resolutions... Israel has violated all international norms to date... Any country that is no consistent and regular in not abiding by international law and UN resolutions, should indeed be expelled from the UN. Israel cannot continue to be treated as a full member of the UN. This Is what the UN Charter says. Shouldn’t Israel now be expelled from the UN under international law? This world has completely lost its meaning.show more

🚨 WARNING: ISRAEL MAY BE ABOUT TO USE NUCLEAR... WEAPONS IN GAZA ⚠️ Sounds crazy right? How could they get away with that? Wouldn’t it be too risky? Let me explain! At this current point in time, Israel is losing the war badly in terms of their main objective. Every attempt they make to create progress against Hamas is being met with difficult challenges. The majority of Hamas fighters are highly motivated and overwhelmingly willing to sacrifice their lives. The majority of Israeli fighters are motivated, yes, but most of them do not have a military mindset or the same level of willingness to sacrifice their lives. Some of them do, of course, but remember the majority of the Israel military consists of normal citizens who are required by law to join, not people who would necessarily feel called to duty otherwise. So how does that relate to nuclear weapons? Using just a small nuclear weapon in Gaza would likely make everyone there rush to evacuate which is what Israel truly wants. They would like to take that land and reduce the threat from such a long border. If Israel continues on the path they are currently on the war will take years or even decades and may never truly be won. If they stage a false flag to use as justification for a small nuclear weapon in Gaza, they could potentially end the conflict in only a matter of weeks. Do not panic as speculation is required to believe they are about to do this, however it is still important to stay alert for that very real possibility. Ben Shapiro, who is friends with Benjamin Netanyahu, recently stated he believes nuclear weapons are on the table under certain circumstances. This is a scary time for humanity as we are perhaps closer to WW3 than we have ever been ⚠️ (Video shows simulation of nuclear weapon)show more