We also tested Sonnet 5 against Opus 4.8 on... agentic prompting, specifically on dynamic scenes through Seedance 2.0 via Higgsfield MCP. Here is the result:show more

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 on agentic prompting. Both... videos generated using Seedance 2.0.show more

Claude Sonnet 5 is live on Higgsfield. It plans... and runs marketing asset pipelines on its own via Higgsfield MCP, at a level that used to need bigger, costlier models. It also makes agentic pipelines more efficient on Higgsfield Supercomputer.show more

Claude Fable 5 excels at scriptwriting. We just paired... it with the Higgsfield MCP and the results are stunning. Here is a comparison with Opus 4.8:show more

I purchased the seedance 2 unlimited plan on Higgsfield,... run the exact prompt across 4 different models at 720p, 10s: - Seedance 2 - Seedance 2 Fast - Seedance 2 Mini - Enhanced Seedance 2.0 Fast on Higgsfield Here are the results: 1. Enhanced Seedance 2.0 Fast on Higgs:show more

Sonnet 5 is here. It's worse than Opus 4.8... on nearly every benchmark... Does that mean it's useless? Absolutely not. Use it with Claude Code Dynamic Workflows! 1. /model set to Sonnet 5 2. /effort set to Ultracode 3. Any complex task will kick off a dynamic workflow This will only become more powerful when Fable is back. You'll use Fable 5 as the superintelligent advisor and Sonnet 5 as the fast and efficient implementer.show more

Seedance 2.0 got its perfect match on Higgsfield. Grok... Imagine and Seedance 2.0 - xAI's image model paired with the category-leading video model, natively inside the platform. Grok Imagine generates your reference image in 9+ styles, fast. Seedance 2.0 - ranked #1 in image-to-video - takes it further than any other model can. The best results out of Seedance 2.0 start here.show more

people: AI is expensive higgsfield: $0.35 per Seedance 2.0... video generation. literally cheapest on the market. just saying.show more

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level... 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other modelshow more

Everyone is dunking on Sonnet 5 for losing to... Opus 4.8 on benchmarks. They're all making the same mistake, judging a teammate by a solo test. Sonnet 5 was never built to win alone. Set the model to Sonnet 5, effort to Ultracode, and any complex task auto-kicks a dynamic workflow where it plans, spawns agents, executes and checks its own work, fast and cheap. When Fable 5 comes back, the setup gets stupid good. Fable 5 decides what to build, Sonnet 5 actually builds it. You stop paying flagship prices to do grunt work.show more

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same... prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.show more

The level of photorealism and natural movement here is... unbelievable. 😄 Look at the sunlight, the skin details, and how smooth the transitions are from stretching to tying her hair! GPT Image 2.0 x Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield is undoubtedly the best combination right now for creating ultra-realistic cinematic characters. Two SOTA models joining forces to change the game. 🎥✨ #ad #sponsored $HIGGS Higgsfield AI 🧩 #Higgsfield #AIVideoshow more

Fable 5, first Mythos-class model is live on AI/ML... API! We ran a fun test: Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 are generating a 3D Pokemon. Verdict? Fable 5 is brilliant, fast, and rare as Mew… but Opus is still that nice little guy who does great stuff. 💛 Fable 5 Important bits: SOTA on nearly every benchmark, and the lead only grows on longer, complex tasks. • 1M Context • $10 / 1M input • $50 / 1M output Built for: long-horizon agentic coding, big migrations, vision-to-code, deep research.show more

Opus 4.8 is solid... but ultracode is on another... level Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code lets you orchestrate agents in parallel while your session stays free. One word: delegate Focus on governance, security guardrails, and skills. The code is already solvedshow more

Create cinematic AI videos with Seedance 2.0 at a... lower cost. With the Ultra Plan on BudgetPixel AI, Seedance 2.0 is 40% off — perfect for making more action scenes, ads, game clips, and story-driven videos.show more

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on... real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!show more

This is NOT a real person. 🤯 I just... tested Seedance 1.5 Pro on Higgsfield AI. It creates visuals and sound at the same time, with spot-on lip sync, natural ambient audio and cinematic cuts, all from a single prompt. Here are few more examples 👇🏻show more

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a... MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:show more

New: President Trump confirms Art of the Surge is... a hit! Season 2 is on the way but you can watch all season 1 episodes here on X. We also post behind the scenes clips on our TikTok:show more

Seedance 2.0 is also quite strong on some visual... reasoning tasks — I just told it to place the geometric boards in the right positions. Of courses, it is not perfect l. Image from Google deepmind.show more