We are introducing LipiGo 🤗 A programmable DNA–lipid nanocarrier... 🧬 with built-in targeting logic. It de-targets the liver and redirects mRNA delivery into lymphoid organs, enhancing therapies requiring the immune system. by cerenkimna Karoline 1/nshow more

Epstein wanted everyone in the world to have his... DNA. And was working with the people making the mRNA vaccine and using it as a delivery system with his own DNA 🧬 so he can live on forever…..insane if trueshow more

'This Is a Problem': We Could Be Altering Immune... Systems for Generations Dr. Ryan Cole (): "With a lipid nanoparticle and mRNA in a mouse study, the genes that were turned on and off in that immune system pattern were passed onto the next generation. Every litter of [mice], four litters in a row that this mom had, had these gene alterations imprinted after her immune system was altered by the shots."show more

Horrific. “The ‘Covid Vaccine’ is causing Turbo Cancers, In-Utero... Tumors and Immune System Collapse. The mRNA platform is a weapon with catastrophic, multi-system attack vectors. Flu, RSV, HIV, and Cancer Vaccines are ALL built on this deadly platform...”show more

We've been told the COVID vaccines are a marvel... of modern science. But what if the platform itself—the mRNA technology—is inherently dangerous, and the pandemic was used to normalize it before its flaws were solved? As Bret Weinstein explains, while the spike protein is problematic, the greater danger is the mRNA platform. "Anything you loaded onto that platform would produce many of these pathologies, because the platform itself is deeply flawed." The pandemic provided the perfect excuse to deploy this technology on billions with minimal testing, making its flaws "disappear" in the name of urgency. This normalized a platform that can be quickly reformulated for any new pathogen, creating a lifetime of repatentable products. But what is the core flaw? It's the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery system. The mRNA message is wrapped in tiny fat bubbles. The critical failure: they don't stay in the deltoid muscle. They circulate throughout your entire body. Here’s why that’s catastrophic: Your cells are covered in a fatty layer. These lipid nanoparticles, being fat-based, are absorbed by any cells they encounter—your heart, liver, brain, ovaries, testes. Once inside, the cell is hijacked. It reads the mRNA instructions and begins mass-producing a foreign protein (like the spike protein). This triggers a devastating immune response. Your immune system is designed to recognize and DESTROY any of your own cells that start producing a protein they shouldn't. It treats them like cancer or a viral infection. So, the shot turns your body's cells into targets. As Weinstein states: "Their mRNA shots are a pseudovirus. They infect cells, cause those cells to make this protein, and then the immune system... destroys them." If this cellular destruction happens in an organ you can spare, like the liver, you might be okay. But if it happens in your heart? It creates a microscopic wound. Under stress, this can lead to a catastrophic event like a burst blood vessel. The platform has no targeting mechanism. It cannot control which of your vital organs becomes a battleground. The result is an unpredictable, Russian roulette of auto-immune destruction. The takeaway is stark: The problem isn't just what's in the shot, but how the shot works. Until this fundamental delivery flaw is solved—if it ever can be—any future mRNA product deployed must be met with extreme skepticism and a resounding NO. This is not anti-vax. This is pro-science. It is a demand for safe, effective, and honestly tested medical technology.show more

🚨🚨 EPIC Paul Offit takedown! PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE... WIDELY! A point by point analysis of the false claims and lies he presented as scientific fact in his infamous 2024 "DNA fragments in COVID vaccines are completely harmless" video: LIE #1: The mRNA vaccines contain fragments of DNA, but these are in very small quantities, measured in nanograms - Counterargument: Even though the DNA fragments may be in small quantities, their presence still poses a risk. DNA integration into the genome, even in small quantities, could still have long-term, unpredictable effects that we are not yet fully aware of. LIE #2: Impossibility of DNA entering human DNA: For these DNA fragments to integrate into our DNA, they would have to overcome several barriers, including crossing the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane, which is virtually impossible - Counterargument: The entire purpose of the LNP (lipid nanoparticle) in mRNA vaccines is to allow for the mRNA to enter the cytoplasm in order to transcribe the desired proteins. While fragments integrating into human DNA might be low, it's not "impossible." Scientific literature on gene editing technologies, like CRISPR, demonstrates that foreign DNA can be integrated into the genome under certain conditions. LIE #3: Role of innate immune system in rejecting foreign DNA: The innate immune system and enzymes in the cytoplasm work to destroy foreign DNA - Counterargument: While our immune system does recognize and destroy some foreign DNA, the immune response isn't perfect, especially if the foreign DNA is introduced in a manner that is not immediately recognized such as via the LNP. In certain environments or under specific conditions, foreign DNA can evade immune detection. LIE #4: Lack of integrases in mRNA vaccine DNA: The DNA fragments in the mRNA vaccine do not have the necessary integrases to integrate into our genome - Counterargument: While the fragments might lack integrases, it's possible that they could still interact with the genome in other ways, for example, through epigenetic changes or by influencing gene expression as is commonly achieved in laboratory settings. LIE #5: Comparison to naturally occurring foreign DNA: We are constantly exposed to foreign DNA through our food from bacteria, plants, and animals, which is much larger and more abundant than the DNA in vaccines - Counterargument: Although we are exposed to foreign DNA regularly through the digestive tract, the introduction of DNA through vaccination is a more controlled and concentrated process. The body is not naturally prepared to deal with such DNA in the same way it handles the ingestion of plant or animal DNA. LIE #6: Fear-mongering accusation: The physician scientist who raised these concerns was just scaring people unnecessarily - Counterargument: Raising concerns about potential risks is an important part of scientific discourse, especially when it comes to public health. It's better to err on the side of caution and investigate these possibilities rather than dismissing concerns outright, especially when the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines are still being studied. LIE #7: Assurance that these risks are negligible: The DNA fragments from the vaccines are clinically harmless - Counterargument: The assertion that these fragments are harmless is premature. Without long-term studies specifically addressing the potential risks of vaccine-derived DNA integration, it's impossible to claim with certainty that there will be no adverse effects in the future. Paul Offit knows all of this, so WHY IS HE LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC? Please share this important video with everyone you know and DEMAND TRANSPARENT RESEARCH INTO THE QUESTION OF DNA CONTAMINATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE #COVID #vaccinated POPULATION! @P_J_Buckhaults Kevin McKernan Danny Jones Bret Weinstein Vejon Health - Dr Philip McMillan John Campbell Robert F. Kennedy Jr Steve Kirsch #AwfulOffitshow more

🔥 Dr. Kelly Victory Does a Full 180 on... ALL Vaccines: “I Believe We Are Over-Immunizing” “I said [in the past], ‘There’s no credible evidence that vaccines are associated with autism.’ I would do a 180 on that,” professed Kelly Victory MD. “The immune system reacts in ways we don’t necessarily anticipate, and we have been effing with it in a way by continually flogging the immune system with vaccine after vaccine after vaccine,” she continued. “And we are seeing unprecedented rates, not only of autism, Steve Kirsch, but in other things (autoimmune diseases, allergies, eczema, etc.) that I think are likely attributed to or potentially made worse by this assault on the human immune system.”show more

.@FoxyHasan is experimenting with physics in Unity by combining... Leaf Physics and 3D Pixel Physics. 🌿 Built with the C# Burst Compiler and Unity’s Graphics API, it’s shaping into a programmable, physics-based particle system. #Unity3D #gamedev #indiedevshow more

"It's a permanent fixture of their genome now" "Can... the little pieces of DNA that are in the [Pfizer mRNA] vaccine ever get into the human genome?": “The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with Plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA...it's got bits of DNA in it [and I know] because I sequenced it in my own lab” Phillip Buckhaults, PhD Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Scientist & Professor of Molecular Biology & Geneticsshow more

"There's absolutely no question that this was not an... accident...the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product [in the C19 jabs] is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme." Canadian Comprehensive Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker (@CShoemakerMD) describes for the RAIR Foundation (RAIR Foundation USA) how the DNA contamination of the COVID injections "was not an accident." Shoemaker notes that "They have lied to us in the extreme" and "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term." "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished," Shoemaker says. "And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be." "What's the difference [if there is] DNA is in [the jabs] instead of just mRNA? The difference is that...the DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, [and] can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell," Shoemaker says. "And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8- to 10-year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots." Partial transcription of clip: "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished. And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme. "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term. We know the 2 percent, 3 percent of people who passed away suddenly and surprisingly and that's way more than should happen. But the long term effect on the ability to fight cancer or for a cancer to perhaps be a turbo cancer, all these are being influenced by both DNA and RNA that is within us. "The key thing is that it makes the whole process last longer. If it was only mRNA, it would probably be 8 to 12 months only that mRNA would seed out into your body and be repeatedly creating spike, repeatedly creating spike. Remember, the end-product is the most dangerous part of this human engineered genome. The spike protein is the thing that congeals blood cells against each other. The spike protein is the thing that, if it's in your liver, is waving a flag saying, Hey, I'm not your liver. I'm not a human liver. I've got this strange created spike protein. You can identify that I'm not your liver, and you can attack it, and you can make hepatitis for this person because it's not even their liver. "This is what mRNA does is create a flag so that you're attacking through your healthy immune system. Your healthy immune system is going after it in organ after organ after organ. For some people, it's just a specific organ that was already a bit weak to begin with. And for other people, it's a different organ. But either way, mRNA produces a spike flag, which your immune system attacks. "To return to your question about DNA, what's the difference that DNA is in there instead of just mRNA? The difference is that the DNA can, for years, not just 8 to 12 months. The DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell. And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8 to 10 year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots."show more

We don’t “wake up with cancer.” Dr. Leigh Erin... Connealy says it’s often a 10-year breakdown in immune surveillance, driven by toxins, stress, EMFs, infections, and lifestyle. The immune system doesn’t just protect… it polices. Support it, or disease fills the vacuum.show more

Bret Weinstein Reveals the Hidden Danger of mRNA Vaccines:... "It’s Worse Than You Think" The mRNA platform was designed to make your cells produce a foreign protein—the spike—displaying it on their surface. But here’s the terrifying part: there’s no precision in where this happens. Your heart. Your brain. Your vital organs. Any cell can be hijacked to become a spike protein factory. And when your immune system sees these cells, it does what it’s programmed to do—attack them as if they’re infected by a virus. Myocarditis isn’t just a "side effect." It’s a symptom of your body literally destroying its own heart cells because they’ve been turned into targets. The inflammation? That’s collateral damage from an immune system forced to wage war on itself. This isn’t immunity. This is autoimmunity by design. And the worst part? No one knows the long-term consequences. —Bret Weinsteinshow more

How many billions of doses would have gone into... peoples arms, if the "safe and effective" message was replaced with: "The DNA contamination will be protected within a lipid nano particle so that the SV40 sequences can be escorted into the cells cytoplasm and that "animal work" has shown that the mRNA injection will go to the Nucleus of your cells". New discussion with Dr Clare Craig, who reveals to John Campbell that an Australian FOI request revealed an immunofluorescence study that showed : "you can also see some in the Nucleus...so the lipid nano particles were entering the Nucleus". New peer reviewed research showed that for DNA impurities: ◻️"Pfizer exceeds limits by 36-153 fold" ◻️"Moderna exceeds limits by 112-627 fold" Published by Speicher et al (McKernan, Rose). Any contaminants are protected and bypass the immune systems detection, so that all of its contents is ushered into the cells cytoplasm, for the event of hijacking the cells machinery to make spike protein.show more

Bret Weinstein breaks down the three foundational vaccine technologies,... arguing that none are fundamentally safe. Each carries a severe, inherent downside. 1. Live Attenuated Vaccines: The risk here is unpredictability and evolution. A virus weakened for one person may cause a serious infection in another. Crucially, it can revert to a pathogenic, transmissible form—a "contagious vaccine." The historical case of the oral polio vaccine causing numerous polio cases stands as a stark warning. 2. Inactivated Virus/Fragments (with Adjuvant): The problem is immune misdirection. A dead virus alone is unconvincing, requiring an "adjuvant"—a chemical alarm bell. This non-specific signal causes the immune system to "freak out," not just at the target antigen but at anything present, like pollen or gut bacteria. Indiscriminately triggering a systemic immune response is a dangerous gamble. 3. mRNA Technology: The danger is haphazard biodistribution. The mRNA instructions travel unpredictably, instructing cells anywhere in the body to produce the foreign antigen. The immune system then rightly identifies these cells as infected and attacks them. This random destruction of healthy tissue—for instance, in the heart—is an unacceptable and fundamentally unsafe mechanism. The conclusion is sobering: our current technological paradigms for vaccination are built on foundations with profound and unaddressed safety trade-offs.show more

A decade ago, our economy was one of the... "Fragile Five." We began the second quarter of the 21st century as the fastest-growing major economy in the world. We began with a fiscal deficit on an unsustainable trajectory. We have brought it to 4.4% of GDP, en route towards 50% debt-to-GDP by 2030-31. We began with a tax system built on suspicion. We have created one premised on trust. We moved the budget date. We introduced quarterly limits. We built the TSA and the PFMS ecosystem. We decriminalized commerce. We made tax assessment faceless. We created an inflation targeting framework and the institutional independence that makes it credible. These are not small achievements. They are the cumulative result of thousands of decisions by the collective wisdom of people and leadership who chose the harder, more principled path when the easier one was always available. - Smt Nirmala Sitharaman in New Delhi (1/n)show more