What doesn’t try hard, but makes everyone look twice?... Middle Riddle Classic Tee — 🖤 THB 1,190 available sizes : 1 - 2 First drop: exclusively at the concert 09.08.25 - 10.08.25 #middleriddleclub #WearMiddleLiveRiddleshow more

Wings on my back. Riddle on my chest. Middle... Riddle Tank Top — 🩵 THB 990 available sizes : Men and Women First drop: exclusively at the concert 09.08.25 – 10.08.25 #middleriddleclub #WearMiddleLiveRiddleshow more

Today’s Thai Lesson 101 with me: ‘ตี๋ (Tee)’ Let's... learn abt this because we use this word A LOT in Thailand. If you’re in a Thai fandom, you’re going to see it everywhere for sure 555555 So Originally, ‘Tee’ was used to describe a ‘Chinese-looking guy’ and ‘Muay’ was for a ‘Chinese-looking girl’ But what can I say? This is Thailand lol. Everything is gender-fluid here, so people just use whatever they want. I’ve seen people use ‘Muay’ for male artists and ‘Tee’ for female artists. In the GL/BL fandom, ‘Tee’ is mostly used to describe a Seme with that cool chinese look, while 'Muay' is for an Uke. Anyway, let’s look at these EmiBonnie moments as examples 1. An ANY posted "Recommended bedtime prayer. Put your hands together and say 'Love Seme-Tee, Love Seme-Tee, Love Seme-Tee, Love Seme-Tee. Amen." along with pics of Emi, and Bonnie replied "Amen." 2. Bonnie posted this on Halloween with the caption "ผีรักหนุ่มเต๋อ" (Phee Rak Num Ter), which is a spoonerism for "เผลอรักหนุ่มตี๋" (Phleur Rak Num Tee, 'Accidentally fell for a Tee guy'). Emi replied, "It’s me, the Muay-Tee." (And to add fuel to the fire, Pahn also replied to Bonnie "Do you love a Tee guy or a Tee girl? Just say it") 3. As y’all know, Bonnie just adopted lil Muju. When he was first adopted, she said, "The boba-eyes Tee boy is here kubb~" 4. Bonnie just posted a TikTok with this sound "Tee, pls don't leave me~ Tee~🥺" So... yeah. That's it for today's lesson! Hope y'all learned smth! 555555show more

A photo of Junbeom and Suho. Two theories: 1.... Junbeom is really Junbeom, and the one who died in Syria was his friend Suho. Since Seolah was Suho’s gf, he would’ve talked about her to Junbeom. And his last wish was for Junbeom to protect her. But he knows Suho died because of Seolah (really?), so he probably approached her at first with revenge in mind. But the show is called SIREN’S KISS, so he might end up falling for her. 2. The one who died in Syria was actually Junbeom. The real Suho didn’t die, got plastic surgery to look like Junbeom, and came back as Junbeom. (If it’s this one… the writer and director really went crazy with this👏🏻respect🧎🏻‍♀️) Seolah thought the auction was her first time meeting Junbeom, but from what he says, it really doesn’t feel like that at all. It actually feels like he knows her really well. And he clearly doesn’t like his photos being out there. Even his character intro says he really avoids any contact with the media. And he says he’s still dealing with the aftereffects of an accident…… I’m really curious about him. You need like 10 brains to watch Siren’s Kiss.show more

In 2007, I designed tools that let anyone draw... on top of Google Maps. People could drop pins, draw lines and shapes, and layer their own meaning onto the world with "My Maps." But nearly 20 years later, one tiny design debate has stayed with me: how should people draw a shape? At the time, we had two options. 1. Draw mode: users click and drag to create. 2. Drop + edit: the app drops a default shape, then users resize + move it. I pushed hard for draw mode. People were tracing rivers and roads, so precision mattered. A default square dropped in the middle of Kansas wasn’t going to cut it. Decades later, this same debate is still playing out in modern tools: → Figma, Illustrator, Google Slides use draw mode → Canva, Keynote, PowerPoint use drop + edit While there clearly isn't consensus, some newer products are evolving beyond these patterns: → FigJam gracefully merges draw mode and drop + edit into one concept with its semi-transparent “ghost” objects. → Apple Photos on iPhone is a great context for drop + edit. The canvas is small and the mobile user inputs are limited. After decades of using digital drawing tools, I still bristle when a tool drops an unsolicited rectangle onto my screen. At best, it feels presumptuous. At worst, it feels lazy. When we built My Maps, we designed tools that invited users to create. We provided the means, but we let people lead. That same principle applies to every product today: understand who you’re building for and what they need, then design the simplest, most intuitive workflows — ones that let users lead. Because in the end, the best tools don’t assume what users want. They respond. Full breakdown in comments below.show more

This 2d and 10 play in the 2Q of... the #Eagles-Chiefs game caught my eye live because it was one of a few attempted deep shots, and while Jalen Hurts may have been expected to pull the trigger to DeVonta Smith up top on the dagger/go double move, I questioned the route concepts and spacing on my latest podcast episode with Mike Sielski. I’ve since asked a few impartial sources that are more experts on this sort of thing, and while they both qualified their answers with not knowing intent, etc., they thought, yes, Hurts could have thrown it, but the Chiefs also got him off the first read, and still had safety help over top, although it looked like Smith got him to turn his hips at the break. Jahan Dotson was the No. 2 at the bottom, and he should be separating when Hurts moves off No. 1. Chiefs had him covered, though, in man. Normally, that route can be more intermediate and/or over the middle. Doesn’t have to be, but another source agreed you’d like to have at least an intermediate No. 3 underneath in Hurts’ line of vision. Clearly that wasn’t the case here. Hurts had all sorts of time and no obvious options after 1 and 2. Calcaterra stayed in to chip, and Barkley to block to set up the shot. All makes sense. Perhaps Calcaterra as the No. 3 could have kept going into the void over the middle on an option route? Nothing egregious here. No easy answers. But thought I’d provide more analysis on a play that I questioned live and in the podcast. Either way, the Eagles are struggling to get guys open downfield deep and on intermediate routes and, at least on Sunday, Hurts maybe missed a few early chances. He and Smith told me after the game that they thought they were “chasing it” too often in the first half. Kevin Patullo’s game planning was more conservative in the 2H and that ended up being enough. But he probably knows it isn’t sustainable.show more

🚨 WARNING: MONDAY COULD BE THE WORST MOMENT OF... 2026!! Make sure to take a look at this before June 8, that’s tomorrow. The $SPCX IPO is coming on June 12. And markets open this Monday, June 8. This is the first real trading week before one of the biggest IPO events in market history. SpaceX is expected to go public at around $1.75 TRILLION to $2 TRILLION valuation. That one number explains everything. Because money does NOT appear from nowhere. If funds want to buy $SPCX, they need cash. And where does that cash come from? They sell what they already own. Stocks will dump. Crypto will dump. High beta tech will dump even harder. This is NOT just an IPO. This is a liquidity drain. Everyone sees the Elon hype. Almost nobody sees the forced selling. There are only a few ways this goes from here, and they are NOT equal. - LIGHT SHOCK: funds sell small positions, stocks get hit first, crypto follows, then markets try to stabilize. - HEAVIER SCENARIO: funds raise cash before June 12, high beta tech dumps, Bitcoin loses support, and retail gets trapped. - WORST CASE: everyone rushes into $SPCX at the same time, liquidity disappears from crowded trades, stocks dump HARD, crypto gets hit first, and people get liquidated. That last one is the REAL danger. Because none of this is happening in a vacuum. Stocks are already crowded. Crypto is already weak. Liquidity is already getting worse. And now one of the most hyped IPOs in history is about to absorb even more money. Now connect the dots. If everyone wants $SPCX, they need dollars. To get dollars, they sell assets. And when everyone sells at the same time, markets do NOT dip slowly. They dump. This is NOT a theory. The $SPCX IPO is June 12. Markets open Monday, June 8. And this is when positioning starts. Markets are NOT pricing the liquidity drain now. But they will. I usually do the opposite of what the masses are doing. Reminder: I’ve called all the market tops and bottoms for the last 15 years, including the Bitcoin bottom at $16,000 and the top at $126,000. The next call will be even more important. When I exit the markets completely, I’ll post it here publicly like I always do. Turn notifications on. If you’re not following yet, you’ll understand why that was a mistake later.show more

rewatching ep 4 for the nth time and I... think this is going to be one of those scenes that stays with me for a very long time😭it isn’t just Pete crying, he completely breaks down like full sobbing, barely holding himself together, curling into a ball of grief hiding himself in the blanket like years of pain finally poured out at once. When you think about everything we know about Pete, he’s just 24, yet he’s been emotionally exhausted for years. His gang is younger than him, meaning he can’t really share anything with them. His sister neglects him, and the way he talks about his relatives makes it obvious that his family life is filled with distance rather than care😔 It’s the first time Pete has ever talked about his past, not running from it but actually saying it out loud while someone quietly listens to him. Niran doesn’t interrupt Pete or try to comfort him. He looks composed the whole time, but I can feel his emotions through the silence, the sigh, the way he listens. He is simply lying there but it’s a safe space for Pete to unravel, which is why Pete later says that people feel at ease around Niran. It’s not cuz Niran is affectionate, it’s cuz he says things as they are and that helps Pete feel like he can be himself around him, even at his most broken moment. The scene before where he was furious with Pete, he’s not judging Pete’s life, he’s just giving him the hard truth. He doesn’t sugarcoat things, but he also doesn’t invalidate Pete’s pain. Instead, he’s trying to make Pete realize that his life has value, but he’s letting anger, recklessness and negative emotions get the best of him. And for someone like Pete, who spent most of his life feeling unwanted and unseen, this kind of brutal honesty is what he needs to turn over a new leaf🥹show more

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the... context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.show more

Look at how American children live! I filmed this... on my way home from New York City after attending the World Falun Dafa Day parade a few days ago. I happened to get stuck behind a school bus, which kept stopping and delayed me quite a bit — but it also gave me a chance to closely observe the happy lives of these children. As you can see, the school bus drops each child off right at their home. Sometimes two houses are only five or ten meters apart, yet the bus still stops separately for each family. It doesn’t try to save time by dropping the children somewhere in between and making them walk home on their own. Around the 10-second mark in the video, you can see a small child get off the bus and cross the street to go home. That’s why in the United States, whenever a school bus stops, not only must all the cars behind it stop, but even the cars coming from the opposite direction must stop as well — all to ensure children can cross the road safely. I filmed both of these clips from inside my car. I was quite amazed that day, but I hadn’t had time to share them until now. Today I finally wanted to show everyone. This is what a society built for people looks like! And compare American children's lives with those of Chinese children! A follower of my Chinese language account 曾錚 says that a lot of Chinese middle and high-school students are just like prisoners, and their parents are only allowed to visit them at school once a month!show more

And this? This is the very first piece of... artificial limestone, YES, CaCO3, YES, hard as f and YES, waterproof, what I made from… Wood ash ONLY!!! 100% caveman tech! Now look at the color of this thing. How would you describe it? May I say it has the color of the pyramids? Hell yeah! Why? BTW: this is just the binder. Add original, natural limestone and fossils and you’ll en up with “natural” limestone. (With a bit of potassium residue.) Any questions? The secret recipe maybe? Anyone interested? Here you go: 1. Burn 🔥 everything around you and collect the wood ash 2. Burn natural limestone (calcination) to produce quick lime Steps 1. and 2. can be combined into one step. 3. Make wood ash lye the traditional way, by dripping drip 💧 water on wood ash and collecting the water that went through the ash. Any vessel will do but an oak barrel is the traditional way doing it. I used a plastic bucket with holes at the bottom. The wood ash lye is mostly KOH and K2CO3. What we need is CaCO3. We need to change the letter K to letters Ca. We’ll do it by adding the letters Ca to the liquid. 4. Add quick lime (CaO) or hydrated lime, slaked lime (Ca(OH)2) to the lye until it stops bubbling in vinegar. (We badly miss a decent video at this point, Marcell!!!) 5. Add (or don’t add) fossils = natural limestone rubble to the mix, stir well 6. Get rid of of the excess liquid through a nub Now any expert can tell you that this will never make a stone because of two reasons: 1. Billions of years and 2. High pressure are needed Well, no. The first point is just total nonsense, and although the second has something in it, it is false. Virtually ANY pressure will make it, including my current technique of squeezing it in a kitchen cloth. I’m not kidding. No pressure- no stone, that is correct. But only a minimal level of pressure, using my bare hands is enough to push the freshly made CaCO3 molecules close enough for crystallization (calcit) to begin. And here we are.show more

Honestly, I hate that I even have to say... this, but seeing people use one single fancam to claim Sana “can’t dance” is genuinely ridiculous. Y’all, for everyone dragging Sana because of one video from the 73rd THIS IS FOR tour show, I think it’s important to look at the full context before judging her dancing ability. First of all, Sana had been dealing with a cold, flu, and cough for over a month at that point, which can definitely affect stamina and performance consistency during a 2–3 hour concert. There are also several factors that can make the dancing look less smooth in that particular fancam: 1. Outfit If you’ve watched other fancams from this black outfit era, Sana was adjusting her outfit quite often on stage because it seemed to shift, slip, or sit unevenly at times. An uncomfortable outfit can naturally affect movement and make a performer more cautious. 2. Camera tracking The camera appears to follow her movements slightly late. Even a small delay can make smooth transitions look jerky or abrupt when viewed on video. 3. Awkward zoom distance The fancam isn’t zoomed out enough to show the full choreography, but it’s also not close enough to focus on facial expressions. Because of that, viewers end up focusing mostly on body transitions and posture, which can make movements look harsher than they actually are. 4. Phone camera limitations High-energy movements recorded on a phone can suffer from motion blur, stabilization issues, and frame-rate limitations. Sharp movements that look clean in person can appear choppy or less fluid on video. 5.Stamina This was already the 73rd show of the tour. Performing the same demanding choreography for dozens of concerts while dealing with illness can affect anyone’s energy level. And if this one clip is enough to convince you that Sana “can’t dance,” then I encourage you to watch other performances of Right Hand Girl from different angles and different outfits. Looking at a performer’s overall body of work will always give a more accurate picture than judging them from a single fancam. One fancam does not erase years of consistently solid performances.show more

🚨 SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD IS COMING THIS MONDAY!! The... $SPCX IPO is coming on June 12. And markets open this Monday, June 8. This is the first real trading week before one of the biggest IPO events in market history. SpaceX is expected to go public at around $1.75 TRILLION to $2 TRILLION valuation. That one number explains everything. Because money does NOT appear from nowhere. If funds want to buy $SPCX, they need cash. And where does that cash come from? They sell what they already own. Stocks will dump. Crypto will dump. High beta tech will dump even harder. This is NOT just an IPO. This is a liquidity drain. Everyone sees the Elon hype. Almost nobody sees the forced selling. There are only a few ways this goes from here, and they are NOT equal. - LIGHT SHOCK: funds sell small positions, stocks get hit first, crypto follows, then markets try to stabilize. - HEAVIER SCENARIO: funds raise cash before June 12, high beta tech dumps, Bitcoin loses support, and retail gets trapped. - WORST CASE: everyone rushes into $SPCX at the same time, liquidity disappears from crowded trades, stocks dump HARD, crypto gets hit first, and people get liquidated. That last one is the REAL danger. Because none of this is happening in a vacuum. Stocks are already crowded. Crypto is already weak. Liquidity is already getting worse. And now one of the most hyped IPOs in history is about to absorb even more money. Now connect the dots. If everyone wants $SPCX, they need dollars. To get dollars, they sell assets. And when everyone sells at the same time, markets do NOT dip slowly. They dump. This is NOT a theory. The $SPCX IPO is June 12. Markets open Monday, June 8. And this is when positioning starts. Markets are NOT pricing the liquidity drain now. But they will. I’ve studied macro for 10 years and I called almost every major market top, including the October BTC ATH. Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the warning BEFORE it hits the headlines.show more

Taste is invisible until you try to write it... down. This is probably my biggest lesson with AI building as of late. At Sundial, I get to work with really friggin' amazing analysts who know the art, and I see how much of our collective time now is now spent turning that art into playbooks or skills for an LLM. Encoding things like: "How would a great analyst actually look at this metric move?" or "What is ACTUALLY the interesting signal in this story versus noise?" or "How can we know if a product change actually moved the needle?" It's really humbling work! You write an instruction set. The LLM misses. You add more context. It still misses. You add even more. Now it's confused. You strip it back. Now it's too vague. You try a different framing. Better, but inconsistent. Works on Monday, fails on Tuesday. You go again. I've come to realize the gap between 70% quality and 95% quality is not 3 or 4 big things. It's more like 100s of small things. Which is exactly why you can't write an article about it, or copy it, or shortcut it! This gap *is* taste, quantified. The accumulated weight of a thousand small judgments you don't notice you're making, until you sit down to externalize them and realize you can't. Being good at something is not the same as being able to articulate why you're good at it. I now see two bottlenecks to making something better than today's generic AI: 1. Can you *see* what better looks like in the first place? 2. Even if you can see, can you *articulate* what that is in a way that the LLM can understand and systemize? #2 is now a new craft, the art of distilling the art. The people who can do it well are the ones building standout products.show more

When I was in high school (20 years ago!... 🤯), a song that really resonated with me while I was sitting alone on the bus was “The Middle” by Jimmy Eat World. A part of me loved it as a pop punk banger. And a part of me resented it for the lies it told. “Hey, don’t write yourself off yet. It’s just in your head you feel left out Or looked down on.” Screw you, Mr. Eat World! You don’t know me! I didn’t really find that community in high school—there were amazing humans, but I wasn’t comfortable enough with myself to connect genuinely with anything but sports. In football, I could play a confident main character. “Just do your best. Do everything you can.” I tried in college. But going to New York City from the country was hard. I was making my way solo—A lone wolf that felt rejected by the pack, but maybe just didn’t try hard enough to find a pack in the first place. Then I found running. And in running, I found a group of people who wanted to wake up at the butt-crack of dawn to do things that often hurt. People who shared a strange obsession that required a wild amount of grit. People who showed up and embraced the silliness of it all. People who often felt strange and accepted others who felt the same way. I love the people in this sport. I wish I could show younger me this video of a finish line kiss, celebrating with a ton of fellow runners. That whole time growing up, I was just in the middle of the ride, thinking my story was already written. If you are out there feeling like that, as Jimmy said, know that everything will be alright, alright. Running, at its core, is about love and acceptance for everyone, especially people who feel different. Through running, I found my people. I found my person. I wish I could go back in time and tell 16-year old me what I’m telling you now: You will too 🧡show more

Do mindshare, sentiment, and price really work in sync?... We're looking at the case of recent $FARTCOIN moves as an example of how to read and analyze data. For most of the last 2 weeks, $FARTCOIN followed the script: uptrend/downtrend in mindshare and sentiment → price followed, as shown on the multi-metric chart at But over the last 3 days: → Sentiment climbed → Price lagged and stayed coherent with mindshare. Could this mean that if the pattern holds, price is primed to catch up? Is sentiment the first thing that climbs, followed by mindshare? If so, this could mean that projects need to focus on generating positive sentiment from current users and holders first, as they are the primary drivers of mindshare growth. Let’s break down what’s really happening with $FARTCOIN and why context is everything. Numbers and price action are only part of the story. They tell you what happened, but not why it happened or what might come next. With you can analyze the context behind the moves: By tracking how people talk, feel, and engage with a project over time along with how much influence they carry. Key Drivers for $FARTCOIN sentiment growth: #1 Buzz Highlight (Cookie Deep Research): “Fartcoin reaches milestone of 155,000 holders showing strong community growth” On the surface, this sounds bullish. But a quick scroll through the Smart Feed shows that CT’s reaction was muted. That nuance matters because not every headline creates FOMO. #2 Smart Feed Signals: Sentiment was up, but not euphoric. While the charts show a clear climb in sentiment, the Smart Feed reveals the tone was measured, not manic. Again, that subtlety matters it’s not just about sentiment rising, but how it rises. #3 Top Voices: Dip Wheeler and CRG have dominated the conversation across most timeframes. Both are $FARTCOIN maxis, this was easily discoverable by stalking their smart feeds, hence if their tone shifts, that’s a signal worth tracking. Knowing who is influencing the narrative is just as important as understanding the narrative. So where does this leave us? If the sentiment → mindshare → price pattern continues to hold, we might see price play catch-up soon. But right now, the Smart Feed doesn’t show full conviction. That’s why looking at price alone isn’t enough. To understand what’s really going on, you need to go deeper into the sentiment, mindshare, and influence data that shapes market moves. Everyone deserves access to market context. That’s what decentralized InfoFi delivers. Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only. Always DYOR.show more

Everyone dreams of hitting it big in Vegas. One... person figured out how no casino, no roulette, no flight. $3.6M on the gap between Vegas and Polymarket. Would you quit at -$1.8M? He didn't. Now he has +$3.6M. That's what separates those who take from those who lose. SeriouslySirius. Biggest win $1.2M from one bet. Secret isn't in analysis. It's in speed. The question isn't who wins. The question is who finds out first. → Wallet: Vegas moves the line by 0.5-1 point. Polymarket catches up a few minutes later. In that window pure money. He doesn't guess the winner. He trades price differences. NFL, NBA huge volumes there. Can enter a $500K position without moving the market. Vegas is his benchmark. Not crowd emotions on Polymarket. Not Twitter. Not analysts. Only bookmaker lines that know more than everyone. Crowd overvalues the favorite? He buys the underdog below 50 cents. Waits. Market corrects. Takes. 6,339 bets. ROI 400,000%. Balance curve up without stops. This isn't gambling. This is arbitrage between those who know and those who catch up. Copying manually is almost impossible window is open 2-3 minutes. But the logic works: look for price gaps between Vegas and Polymarket. Hollywood sells the Vegas dream. Reality is simpler you don't need chips, you need data.show more

Here’s to Shashwat Sachdev. Some collaborations go beyond work,... they become deeply personal. Sha has been that for me. Not just the music composer of Dhurandhar but someone I see as a younger brother, someone I’ve shared chaos, silence, ideas and some of the most intense creative days with. What he’s done on this film still doesn’t feel real when I say it out loud. 9 songs in 9 days for Dhurandhar Part 1, with the entire BGM done in 6 days. And then Dhurandhar Part 2, 14 songs in 11 days, BGM in 3. At that speed, at that scale, with that kind of emotional depth and that kind of extraordinary quality, it’s beyond crazy. And what makes it even more unreal is how both the albums, released within a span of 3 months, reached top global charts, with almost every song being loved and celebrated, something that’s an absolute rarity for any film in the world. For almost 15 days, my house stopped being a house. It became a living, breathing studio. Every room had something going on, music in the living room, recordings in the bedrooms, writing in the balconies. Singers and musicians walking in and out endlessly. Days and nights just blending into each other. 21–22 hour stretches, no real sense of time, just a shared madness to get it right. And right at the center of all of it was Sha. Holding everything together. Creating, composing, guiding, reacting, evolving, all at once. There were days he was unwell, running on barely any sleep, dealing with health scares but he still showed up fully, without compromise, without slowing down. That kind of resilience is rare. Having the legendary Irshad Kamil Sir alongside, and a team that gave everything they had, pushed this into something even more special. Everyone went into absolute God mode. And through all that chaos, Magic (Sha’s better half) was the anchor, keeping things steady, holding the energy together when everything could have easily fallen apart. What makes Sha truly special is not just his talent. It’s his hunger. His refusal to settle. His instinct to keep digging until something feels honest. He doesn’t chase easy, he chases truth in every note. That kind of commitment doesn’t come from skill alone. It comes from love. Love to achieve God through music. And you can feel that love in every second of Dhurandhar. Always grateful. Always rooting for you. ❤️show more

Vintage Paul George possession. Did nothing all game long,... and of course was vastly outplayed by teammate Gershon Yabusele who is making 3 mil a year to Paul’s 60 million. So the possession starts, of course, it’s Paul George who needs the ball. Let’s not let birthday boy Tyrese Maxey who has an efficient 30, start the posession. He’s that guy, having shot 4/13 and 1/7 from 3 at that point. Let him get all over that bully shit. So first, let’s notice who’s guarding Paul here. Grayson Allen, who can only defend guys by kicking them in the balls, and PG doesn’t have any. Get on that bully shit Paul! Drive to the hoop! Hell no. It’s time for that sidestep tween stepback long middie after pounding the shit out of the ball and impressing your stripper wife in the stands. But wait! Let’s check the fucking score. Down 2? Of course! If we’re not going to drive on “Grayson Allen” let’s take a shot one foot in front of the three point line so we can’t win even if Paul makes it! Fucking genius! Let’s take that shot, even though Yabusele, who’s 5/11 from 3 at that point, is wide open! And oh, once he misses, let’s not box out or try to get the rebound whatsoever! Why would he ever do that! He’s Paul George! Podcast P! Hall of famer!show more

A lot of DeFi borrowers these days aren’t really... scared of high rates. They’re scared of rates that can change while they’re sleeping. You borrow USDC at 3%, utilization jumps overnight, and suddenly your cost looks nothing like what you expected. This cycle the real damage for a lot of people wasn’t liquidation. It was never knowing what their borrow cost would be next month. That’s why the latest numbers from TermMax | Fixed Rate Borrowing & Lending stood out. They’re showing fixed USDC borrow rates against cbBTC and WBTC at roughly 2.3% through May 31 and 2.5% through June 30, with July already looking cheaper than most big floating pools on Ethereum. And the rate stays locked the whole time. Most people’s first reaction is still “fixed rates are supposed to be more expensive, right?” These ones are competitive while removing the guesswork. The setup is straightforward. One collateral type, fixed term, risk visible before you borrow. You already know what you’re posting, how long you’re borrowing for, and what the cost should be during that window. No waking up to a completely different number. Floating rate markets keep moving. Liquidity changes, demand changes, utilization changes. A position that feels fine today can reprice hard a few days later. That constant uncertainty becomes its own hidden cost when you’re actually trying to manage cash flow. What they keep saying makes sense once you’ve felt it: known rate, known term, known risk. The risk doesn’t vanish, but at least you see it upfront instead of getting surprised later. Of course there are tradeoffs. Lock in now and rates could drop, leaving you paying more than you might have otherwise. Liquidity and flexibility probably won’t match the biggest variable rate pools either. Still, the mindset in DeFi lending feels like it’s shifting. A year or two ago everyone was just chasing the lowest APY. Now more people seem to care whether they can actually understand what they’re stepping into before they commit. With tokenized assets getting real traction and big projections coming out, that kind of predictability might start mattering more than pure yield chasing. You can actually plan around it. Tired of rate surprises wrecking your positions? Fixed terms like this change how you think about borrowing.show more

Here’s what happened, everyone 😂 “ความเป็นไข้ ก็อยากทานอะไรร้อนๆ แล้วซดน้ำเยอะๆไปหน่อย ถึงกับสำลัก... สำลักไม่พอ ไอแรงจนขึ้นสมองแบบ แอแฮะ แอแฮะ แอแฮะ เข้ามาสิ แค่เนี๊ยะ ” Direct translation “Having a fever makes me crave something hot. I ended up drinking so much soup that I choked on it — not just once, but coughed so hard it felt like my brain was shaking! .. “Ahaeh… ahaeh… ahaeh! Kao ma si” that’s all! The “Ahaeh… ahaeh… ahaeh!..” part sounds like someone coughing. But all part “Ahaeh… ahaeh… ahaeh! Kao ma si” .. It all started from a viral clip of a man whose house was knocked on by the police because he was being too noisy and disturbing his relatives and neighbors. The man denied it and tried to explain to the police that he wasn’t making loud noises — he was just singing a song that goes, “Ahaeh, ahaeh, ahaeh, ahaeh — Kaeo Ma si , kae-Niaa!” The same pronoun of what Engeng wrote “แอแฮะ แอแฮะ แอแฮะ เข้ามาสิ แค่เนี๊ยะ” And it was so funny! 😂 Not only did he sing the wrong lyrics, but his excuse was absolutely ridiculous. Since he kept talking nonstop — probably under the influence of some kind of substance — that’s why he ended up disturbing others. So that’s how the whole “he was just singing” story began. This clip went viral in Thailand with over 10 million views! And because the way he sang sounded exactly like someone coughing, Engfa used his line as her “coughing sound” instead! 🤣🤣🤣 After translating her posts for 3–4 days straight, I think I’m about to go crazy 😂 I’ve posted the viral clip below in case anyone wants to understand what I’m talking about! Oh, and did you know? Engfa actually sang this song at her first major concert — Engfa Mahachon! If you miss it, go check it out 💖🎤 จะเครซี่ 55555555555 อิดขนาดดด 😂 #อิงฟ้ามหาชน #EngfaWaraha Engfa Waraha (ตัวจริง)show more