Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

$0.04 per 1M input tokens 128K context #1 on the Decision Index sub-second decisions Drex is looking less like “another small model” and more like an actual decision layer for agents and LLMs especially if you don’t want to burn a huge model’s tokens just deciding what should happen next

draven

736,775 subscribers

27,308 просмотров • 8 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Nace shows Drex playing a strategy game. i gave it a harder opponent: my timeline Spoiler Guard sends each post to the new decision model and blurs the spoilers, 352 post checked in one session with sub-second calls → 128K context window, per Nace the first and only decision model at that size → #1 on the Decision Index, a Jev rival for $0.04 per 1M input tokens → no text generated, just a probability per post try it with 250M free tokens from Nace AI:

Nace shows Drex playing a strategy game. i gave it a harder opponent: my timeline Spoiler Guard sends each post to the new decision model and blurs the spoilers, 352 post checked in one session with sub-second calls → 128K context window, per Nace the first and only decision model at that size → #1 on the Decision Index, a Jev rival for $0.04 per 1M input tokens → no text generated, just a probability per post try it with 250M free tokens from Nace AI:

Israfil

12,312 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Drex is a MONSTER not because it’s huge it’s actually fewer than 10B parameters but somehow this thing has 128K context, hits 93.4% accuracy across 32K–128K and makes decisions in under a second #1 on the Decision Index too small models are getting VERY good at doing the one thing they actually need to do

Drex is a MONSTER not because it’s huge it’s actually fewer than 10B parameters but somehow this thing has 128K context, hits 93.4% accuracy across 32K–128K and makes decisions in under a second #1 on the Decision Index too small models are getting VERY good at doing the one thing they actually need to do

SONIA

18,247 просмотров • 8 дней назад

JEV ENGINEERING JUST CUT A CLAUDE LOOP FROM $765/MONTH TO $3.02 the expensive part isn’t always writing code. a busy overnight loop can burn ~600 decisions just asking what to do next, whether a command is safe, or if the task is finished. trigger → Jev → allow / stop / wake → Claude only builds when needed at roughly 4,000 tokens per decision, those checks can cost ~$25.50 a night on Fable 5.1. Jev handles the same decision layer at $0.042 per 1M input tokens with output free. over 30 nights that moves the decision bill from ~$765 to $3.02. batch multiple questions into one call and it falls again to about $1.08/month. that’s the part i care about: Claude keeps the expensive work that actually needs intelligence, while Jev handles the hundreds of tiny judgment calls around it.

JEV ENGINEERING JUST CUT A CLAUDE LOOP FROM $765/MONTH TO $3.02 the expensive part isn’t always writing code. a busy overnight loop can burn ~600 decisions just asking what to do next, whether a command is safe, or if the task is finished. trigger → Jev → allow / stop / wake → Claude only builds when needed at roughly 4,000 tokens per decision, those checks can cost ~$25.50 a night on Fable 5.1. Jev handles the same decision layer at $0.042 per 1M input tokens with output free. over 30 nights that moves the decision bill from ~$765 to $3.02. batch multiple questions into one call and it falls again to about $1.08/month. that’s the part i care about: Claude keeps the expensive work that actually needs intelligence, while Jev handles the hundreds of tiny judgment calls around it.

Gipp 🦅

25,081 просмотров • 10 дней назад

China is literally on 🔥 Baidu from China has launched ERNIE 4.5 and ERNIE X1 and it’s freaking cheap . Here is everything you need to know. ERNIE 4.5 - Native multimodal and Outperforms GPT 4.5 in multiple benchmarks at just 1% of GPT 4.5 price - OpenAI GPT 4.5 – Input: $75 / 1M tokens, Output: $150 / 1M tokens; - ERNIE 4.5 – Input: $0.55 / 1M tokens, Output: $2.20 / 1M tokens ERNIE X1 - A deep thinking reasoning model with multimodal capabilities on par with DeepSeek R1 at only half the price See it in action and check out the pricing details👇 📹 source : yiyan[.]baidu[.]com 1/6 ERNIE 4.5 is a multimodal which can take Audio files as well.

China is literally on 🔥 Baidu from China has launched ERNIE 4.5 and ERNIE X1 and it’s freaking cheap . Here is everything you need to know. ERNIE 4.5 - Native multimodal and Outperforms GPT 4.5 in multiple benchmarks at just 1% of GPT 4.5 price - OpenAI GPT 4.5 – Input: $75 / 1M tokens, Output: $150 / 1M tokens; - ERNIE 4.5 – Input: $0.55 / 1M tokens, Output: $2.20 / 1M tokens ERNIE X1 - A deep thinking reasoning model with multimodal capabilities on par with DeepSeek R1 at only half the price See it in action and check out the pricing details👇 📹 source : yiyan[.]baidu[.]com 1/6 ERNIE 4.5 is a multimodal which can take Audio files as well.

AshutoshShrivastava

324,324 просмотров • 1 год назад

GLM 5.2 INPUT FELL FROM $1.40 TO SEVEN CENTS PER MILLION IN NINETY DAYS • what it costs now > $0.07 per million input at the cheapest of 20 providers, a 95% drop in three months. > direct still lists $1.40 in and $4.40 out, with cached input at $0.26. > Same model, same weights, twenty-fold spread depending on the door you walk through. • the free way in > New accounts on get 20M tokens: > 744B MoE, 1M context, MIT weights you can also just download and self-host. Nobody announced this. It happened one provider at a time -> and the model itself never changed. Check which provider you are actually routed through before you top up anywhere ↓

GLM 5.2 INPUT FELL FROM $1.40 TO SEVEN CENTS PER MILLION IN NINETY DAYS • what it costs now > $0.07 per million input at the cheapest of 20 providers, a 95% drop in three months. > direct still lists $1.40 in and $4.40 out, with cached input at $0.26. > Same model, same weights, twenty-fold spread depending on the door you walk through. • the free way in > New accounts on get 20M tokens: > 744B MoE, 1M context, MIT weights you can also just download and self-host. Nobody announced this. It happened one provider at a time -> and the model itself never changed. Check which provider you are actually routed through before you top up anywhere ↓

slash1s

30,276 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

3,868 NULLs. 3,868 unique forms. No two are the same. Register for the whitelist at: Free Mint goes live on OpenSea today, September 30, at 11 AM GMT: NULL is more than a collection of static 2D artwork. Each piece combines art with dynamic visual effects, allowing the form of a NULL to shift and transform when you interact with it. The collection is built around both art and utility. Collectors will be able to burn NULLs to generate $NULL tokens, while the Reborn mechanism introduces a second layer: burn tokens to create a new variation of NULL. Collect. Burn. Reborn. 3,868 forms enter the void. What they become next is part of the experiment.

3,868 NULLs. 3,868 unique forms. No two are the same. Register for the whitelist at: Free Mint goes live on OpenSea today, September 30, at 11 AM GMT: NULL is more than a collection of static 2D artwork. Each piece combines art with dynamic visual effects, allowing the form of a NULL to shift and transform when you interact with it. The collection is built around both art and utility. Collectors will be able to burn NULLs to generate $NULL tokens, while the Reborn mechanism introduces a second layer: burn tokens to create a new variation of NULL. Collect. Burn. Reborn. 3,868 forms enter the void. What they become next is part of the experiment.

Nullform

27,716 просмотров • 8 дней назад

$here's how to make money with jev on autopilot it's a super fast decision model, so it picks an answer in a fifth of a second and tells you how sure it is - put instant pricing on a business that has none - sell the same thing to bigger businesses for more - sell a file that decides what an agent may do - charge monthly to keep all of it running - costs a fraction of a cent per decision - runs on hermes or grok bot, on a schedule just wrote a whole guide on how you can set this up:$

here's how to make money with jev on autopilot it's a super fast decision model, so it picks an answer in a fifth of a second and tells you how sure it is - put instant pricing on a business that has none - sell the same thing to bigger businesses for more - sell a file that decides what an agent may do - charge monthly to keep all of it running - costs a fraction of a cent per decision - runs on hermes or grok bot, on a schedule just wrote a whole guide on how you can set this up:

Chris

90,674 просмотров • 18 дней назад

If you are trying to understand where AI agents are going, learn harness engineering. A capable model is only one part of an agent system. Once the model begins reading files, calling tools, modifying state and working across many steps, the quality of the system depends increasingly on the software around it. Consider a coding agent working through a large repository. The model can decide that it needs to inspect a file, search for a symbol, make an edit or run a test, but those decisions do not execute themselves. The surrounding runtime has to decide which resources are available, whether the requested action is permitted, how the operation should be performed, what result should be retained, and what information should be presented to the model on the next step. This becomes harder as the run gets longer. As history accumulates, replaying everything can become costly and less effective. The harness has to decide what should remain in context, what should be summarized or retrieved later, and what belongs in persistent state outside the context window. Execution has similar problems. A long-running agent may need to survive an interruption, avoid repeating completed work, enforce permissions around consequential actions, and preserve enough history to reconstruct what happened when the final result is wrong. These are harness problems. The harness is the layer that manages context, tools, execution, state, checkpoints, limits and traces around the model. Harness engineering is the work of designing and improving that layer. Engineers inspect execution traces, evaluate agents on representative tasks, look for recurring failure modes, and then change things such as context selection, tool interfaces, state handling or execution controls. That last part matters because agent failures are often not fixed by changing the model. Sometimes the useful change is in what the model sees, how a tool is exposed, what state is preserved, or what the runtime does after a failed step. As agents take on longer tasks, the demands on this surrounding software grow. Model capability remains essential, but harness engineering is what turns that capability into an execution process that can be controlled, inspected, tested and improved.

If you are trying to understand where AI agents are going, learn harness engineering. A capable model is only one part of an agent system. Once the model begins reading files, calling tools, modifying state and working across many steps, the quality of the system depends increasingly on the software around it. Consider a coding agent working through a large repository. The model can decide that it needs to inspect a file, search for a symbol, make an edit or run a test, but those decisions do not execute themselves. The surrounding runtime has to decide which resources are available, whether the requested action is permitted, how the operation should be performed, what result should be retained, and what information should be presented to the model on the next step. This becomes harder as the run gets longer. As history accumulates, replaying everything can become costly and less effective. The harness has to decide what should remain in context, what should be summarized or retrieved later, and what belongs in persistent state outside the context window. Execution has similar problems. A long-running agent may need to survive an interruption, avoid repeating completed work, enforce permissions around consequential actions, and preserve enough history to reconstruct what happened when the final result is wrong. These are harness problems. The harness is the layer that manages context, tools, execution, state, checkpoints, limits and traces around the model. Harness engineering is the work of designing and improving that layer. Engineers inspect execution traces, evaluate agents on representative tasks, look for recurring failure modes, and then change things such as context selection, tool interfaces, state handling or execution controls. That last part matters because agent failures are often not fixed by changing the model. Sometimes the useful change is in what the model sees, how a tool is exposed, what state is preserved, or what the runtime does after a failed step. As agents take on longer tasks, the demands on this surrounding software grow. Model capability remains essential, but harness engineering is what turns that capability into an execution process that can be controlled, inspected, tested and improved.

Tech with Mak

48,700 просмотров • 12 дней назад

🔥IVY TOKENS WILL BE BURNED TO MAKE IT THE FIRST DEFLATIONARY MEME ON HEDERA🔥 IMPORTANT: The $IVY token will be deflationary Yep, IVY, the guardian of the hashgraph, just announced one of its first token burn sources, in partnership with ĦONKbot Read the announcement carefully, and in the next tweets, we'll explain how to use HonkBot First off, we wanna say that we're designing several burn sources for IVY tokens. Here's the first one 🌱🔥 On all chains, Telegram bots are pretty popular, from Banana on Ethereum to Trojan on Solana. They're handy tools that let you buy assets easily, right from your Telegram. By signing up with the code for HonkBot, ALL the fees generated from referrals will be used to buy back IVY tokens and send that amount to a burn wallet 💰 So, the more you use the bot, the more fees are generated, which means more IVY buybacks and more tokens sent to be burned This is just one of the many burn sources we've got planned for IVY. If you don't know how to use a Telegram bot, don't sweat it, we'll walk you through it next. Watch the video and turn up the volume.

🔥IVY TOKENS WILL BE BURNED TO MAKE IT THE FIRST DEFLATIONARY MEME ON HEDERA🔥 IMPORTANT: The $IVY token will be deflationary Yep, IVY, the guardian of the hashgraph, just announced one of its first token burn sources, in partnership with ĦONKbot Read the announcement carefully, and in the next tweets, we'll explain how to use HonkBot First off, we wanna say that we're designing several burn sources for IVY tokens. Here's the first one 🌱🔥 On all chains, Telegram bots are pretty popular, from Banana on Ethereum to Trojan on Solana. They're handy tools that let you buy assets easily, right from your Telegram. By signing up with the code for HonkBot, ALL the fees generated from referrals will be used to buy back IVY tokens and send that amount to a burn wallet 💰 So, the more you use the bot, the more fees are generated, which means more IVY buybacks and more tokens sent to be burned This is just one of the many burn sources we've got planned for IVY. If you don't know how to use a Telegram bot, don't sweat it, we'll walk you through it next. Watch the video and turn up the volume.

IVY

14,857 просмотров • 1 год назад

GEMMA 4 26B ON AN RTX 4060 WITH A 248K TOKEN CONTEXT WINDOW 20 tokens per second and a context window so large you can feed it entire codebases, books and research papers in a single prompt this is not a cloud api and not a server rack, this is a regular consumer gpu running locally with llama.cpp and q4_k_xl quantization 248k context on an 8gb vram card was not supposed to be possible and here it is just running on someone’s desk the article below covers exactly which tools and configs make this kind of setup work in 2026 ↓

GEMMA 4 26B ON AN RTX 4060 WITH A 248K TOKEN CONTEXT WINDOW 20 tokens per second and a context window so large you can feed it entire codebases, books and research papers in a single prompt this is not a cloud api and not a server rack, this is a regular consumer gpu running locally with llama.cpp and q4_k_xl quantization 248k context on an 8gb vram card was not supposed to be possible and here it is just running on someone’s desk the article below covers exactly which tools and configs make this kind of setup work in 2026 ↓

leopardracer

56,865 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Tesla’s 2026.14.6.12 update with FSD 14.3.4 feels like one of those “small numbers, big difference” releases. Lane changes are way smoother now, less hesitation, more clean decisions instead of that awkward “should I, should I not” moment. It just picks a gap and goes. Parking is also noticeably better. It seems more confident about where it’s actually trying to end up, so fewer weird corrections at the last second and less circling around like it’s overthinking it. And the biggest win for me is the reduced stab braking. Way less of that random quick brake tap feeling, especially in normal traffic flow. It’s just smoother and more steady overall. Not a flashy update, but it definitely makes everyday driving feel more relaxed.

Tesla’s 2026.14.6.12 update with FSD 14.3.4 feels like one of those “small numbers, big difference” releases. Lane changes are way smoother now, less hesitation, more clean decisions instead of that awkward “should I, should I not” moment. It just picks a gap and goes. Parking is also noticeably better. It seems more confident about where it’s actually trying to end up, so fewer weird corrections at the last second and less circling around like it’s overthinking it. And the biggest win for me is the reduced stab braking. Way less of that random quick brake tap feeling, especially in normal traffic flow. It’s just smoother and more steady overall. Not a flashy update, but it definitely makes everyday driving feel more relaxed.

Digital Daisy🌸

11,644 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

this is pure f*cking treasure TypeSafeAI engineers spelled out in their docs exactly how Jev fits inside an agent, and these patterns are perfect one rule behind all of them: the LLM thinks, jev decides, code acts I mapped them into 9 live schemes: > model routing jev picks the cheapest model that can do the step > guardrails screens what your agent reads before it acts > tool-call gating every tool call gets allow, ask or deny before it runs > inbox triage the agent only opens what actually needs a reply > reranking jev scores 30 passages, the agent gets the best two > llm evals grades the output and sends it back if it falls short > bulk labeling one question fanned out over a huge table, the agent reads the counts > real-time control games, bots, trading loops: a decision every tick > confidence gate act, confirm or hand it to a human. your code sets the thresholds, not the LLM why it works: > ~100 ms per decision > $0.042 per 1M input tokens, output tokens free > calibrated probabilities on every answer one LLM does the thinking. jev makes the thousand small calls in between save this before you wire your next agent

this is pure f*cking treasure TypeSafeAI engineers spelled out in their docs exactly how Jev fits inside an agent, and these patterns are perfect one rule behind all of them: the LLM thinks, jev decides, code acts I mapped them into 9 live schemes: > model routing jev picks the cheapest model that can do the step > guardrails screens what your agent reads before it acts > tool-call gating every tool call gets allow, ask or deny before it runs > inbox triage the agent only opens what actually needs a reply > reranking jev scores 30 passages, the agent gets the best two > llm evals grades the output and sends it back if it falls short > bulk labeling one question fanned out over a huge table, the agent reads the counts > real-time control games, bots, trading loops: a decision every tick > confidence gate act, confirm or hand it to a human. your code sets the thresholds, not the LLM why it works: > ~100 ms per decision > $0.042 per 1M input tokens, output tokens free > calibrated probabilities on every answer one LLM does the thinking. jev makes the thousand small calls in between save this before you wire your next agent

NO1ennn

24,699 просмотров • 8 дней назад

/1 Gemma 4 31B just crushed Qwen 3.6 27B in a local LLM gamedev contest inside atomic.chat (prompt is below) Device: MacBook Pro M5 Max, 64GB RAM Results: Qwen 3.6 27B: 32 tokens/sec · 18m 04s · 33,946 tokens Gemma 4 31B: 27 tokens/sec · 3m 51s · 6,209 tokens So what is more important: tokens per second, or the quality of the final answer? Qwen made a very long response and showed more creativity and visual style. But Gemma gave a shorter, clearer, and more logical answer in much less time. In this one-shot Pac-Man gamedev contest, Gemma 4 31B was the clear winner. Its game logic was stronger: click reactions were smoother, and it handled interactions with elements like walls, ghosts, and particle effects better. But this was only one test. Maybe Qwen 3.6 27B can show better results with better settings. Open the comments, try our prompt, and share your result below.

/1 Gemma 4 31B just crushed Qwen 3.6 27B in a local LLM gamedev contest inside atomic.chat (prompt is below) Device: MacBook Pro M5 Max, 64GB RAM Results: Qwen 3.6 27B: 32 tokens/sec · 18m 04s · 33,946 tokens Gemma 4 31B: 27 tokens/sec · 3m 51s · 6,209 tokens So what is more important: tokens per second, or the quality of the final answer? Qwen made a very long response and showed more creativity and visual style. But Gemma gave a shorter, clearer, and more logical answer in much less time. In this one-shot Pac-Man gamedev contest, Gemma 4 31B was the clear winner. Its game logic was stronger: click reactions were smoother, and it handled interactions with elements like walls, ghosts, and particle effects better. But this was only one test. Maybe Qwen 3.6 27B can show better results with better settings. Open the comments, try our prompt, and share your result below.

Chubby♨️

72,566 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Fine-tune DeepSeek-OCR on your own language! (100% local) DeepSeek-OCR is a 3B-parameter vision model that achieves 97% precision while using 10× fewer vision tokens than text-based LLMs. It handles tables, papers, and handwriting without killing your GPU or budget. Why it matters: Most vision models treat documents as massive sequences of tokens, making long-context processing expensive and slow. DeepSeek-OCR uses context optical compression to convert 2D layouts into vision tokens, enabling efficient processing of complex documents. The best part? You can easily fine-tune it for your specific use case on a single GPU. I used Unsloth to run this experiment on Persian text and saw an 88.26% improvement in character error rate. ↳ Base model: 149% character error rate (CER) ↳ Fine-tuned model: 60% CER (57% more accurate) ↳ Training time: 60 steps on a single GPU Persian was just the test case. You can swap in your own dataset for any language, document type, or specific domain you're working with. I've shared the complete guide in the next tweet - all the code, notebooks, and environment setup ready to run with a single click. Everything is 100% open-source!

Fine-tune DeepSeek-OCR on your own language! (100% local) DeepSeek-OCR is a 3B-parameter vision model that achieves 97% precision while using 10× fewer vision tokens than text-based LLMs. It handles tables, papers, and handwriting without killing your GPU or budget. Why it matters: Most vision models treat documents as massive sequences of tokens, making long-context processing expensive and slow. DeepSeek-OCR uses context optical compression to convert 2D layouts into vision tokens, enabling efficient processing of complex documents. The best part? You can easily fine-tune it for your specific use case on a single GPU. I used Unsloth to run this experiment on Persian text and saw an 88.26% improvement in character error rate. ↳ Base model: 149% character error rate (CER) ↳ Fine-tuned model: 60% CER (57% more accurate) ↳ Training time: 60 steps on a single GPU Persian was just the test case. You can swap in your own dataset for any language, document type, or specific domain you're working with. I've shared the complete guide in the next tweet - all the code, notebooks, and environment setup ready to run with a single click. Everything is 100% open-source!

Akshay 🚀

126,273 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

We've been defining the actual frontier of AI for science: - created the most powerful agents and generative models of our biomolecular world - coupled with the most accurate models of state - proved again and again ability to break novel ground in drug design >>> now I'm looking for those who want to push frontier LLMs even further, in an environment where you see the impact on real science the next day 1/2

We've been defining the actual frontier of AI for science: - created the most powerful agents and generative models of our biomolecular world - coupled with the most accurate models of state - proved again and again ability to break novel ground in drug design >>> now I'm looking for those who want to push frontier LLMs even further, in an environment where you see the impact on real science the next day 1/2

Max Jaderberg

10,711 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨 Do you understand what Claude just quietly dropped while everyone was distracted? 1 million tokens. Let me explain what that actually means because the number alone doesn't hit right. > A senior engineer joins a company and spends 3 to 6 months just reading code.. Understanding how things connect. Learning where the bugs hide. Why that one file nobody touches exists. It takes months because a codebase is massive and human memory is small. > Claude just loaded the entire thing in one prompt. 30 seconds. Every file, Every function, Every line. All of it. Sitting in memory like it's been working there for years. And it scored highest among every single frontier model. Not GPT.. Not Gemini, Nobody. > Yesterday Amazon's AI nuked production because it couldn't see the full picture - it made a decision with partial context and deleted everything. Today an AI can hold 1 million tokens of context at once. That's the fix. That's the "before and after" moment for AI coding. > 600 images in one request. Entire PDFs. Full repos. And they dropped it on a Friday on all plans like it was a patch note. The scariest AI updates aren't the ones with press conferences. They're the ones that drop in a tweet at 6pm and change everything by Monday morning.

🚨 Do you understand what Claude just quietly dropped while everyone was distracted? 1 million tokens. Let me explain what that actually means because the number alone doesn't hit right. > A senior engineer joins a company and spends 3 to 6 months just reading code.. Understanding how things connect. Learning where the bugs hide. Why that one file nobody touches exists. It takes months because a codebase is massive and human memory is small. > Claude just loaded the entire thing in one prompt. 30 seconds. Every file, Every function, Every line. All of it. Sitting in memory like it's been working there for years. And it scored highest among every single frontier model. Not GPT.. Not Gemini, Nobody. > Yesterday Amazon's AI nuked production because it couldn't see the full picture - it made a decision with partial context and deleted everything. Today an AI can hold 1 million tokens of context at once. That's the fix. That's the "before and after" moment for AI coding. > 600 images in one request. Entire PDFs. Full repos. And they dropped it on a Friday on all plans like it was a patch note. The scariest AI updates aren't the ones with press conferences. They're the ones that drop in a tweet at 6pm and change everything by Monday morning.

Tuki

206,309 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟰 𝗟𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 An agent can burn tokens, declare success, and still fail the tests. That’s often an architecture problem, not a prompting problem. 𝟭. 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗽 → Decides whether to continue Acts → verifies → retries until there’s evidence of success. 𝟮. 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵 → Decides what runs next Handles branches, retries, handoffs, fallbacks, and shared state. 𝟯. 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 → Gives the model its capabilities Tools, APIs, files, memory, permissions, context, and execution environment. 𝟰. 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗮-𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 → Governs multiple agent environments Coordinates different agents, tools, policies, permissions, and workflows. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹: Loop = verification Graph = workflow Harness = capability Meta-harness = governance A better model can improve reasoning. But reliable agents depend on the architecture built around the model.

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟰 𝗟𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗻 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 An agent can burn tokens, declare success, and still fail the tests. That’s often an architecture problem, not a prompting problem. 𝟭. 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗽 → Decides whether to continue Acts → verifies → retries until there’s evidence of success. 𝟮. 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵 → Decides what runs next Handles branches, retries, handoffs, fallbacks, and shared state. 𝟯. 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 → Gives the model its capabilities Tools, APIs, files, memory, permissions, context, and execution environment. 𝟰. 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗮-𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 → Governs multiple agent environments Coordinates different agents, tools, policies, permissions, and workflows. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹: Loop = verification Graph = workflow Harness = capability Meta-harness = governance A better model can improve reasoning. But reliable agents depend on the architecture built around the model.

Dhairya Karekar

18,724 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Six years in a row is starting to look less like a win and more like a habit. Tesla just locked up the top two spots on the American-Made Index again, with Model 3 at #1 and Model Y at #2. Both are built in the U.S. with high domestic parts content. Plenty of brands talk about building American. Tesla keeps taking the top spot. Tesla / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Six years in a row is starting to look less like a win and more like a habit. Tesla just locked up the top two spots on the American-Made Index again, with Model 3 at #1 and Model Y at #2. Both are built in the U.S. with high domestic parts content. Plenty of brands talk about building American. Tesla keeps taking the top spot. Tesla / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

23,827 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🔥 GLM-5.3-Flash Hits #1 on 🐮 GLM-5.3-Flash (Ox Alpha) is now the most-used and most popular model on with cumulative token throughput surpassing 2.41 trillion tokens. As the first native omni-modal model in the GLM-5 series, it packs 320B total parameters, with 18B active, and features a hybrid sparse and linear attention architecture with a 1M-token context window. The result: lightning-fast responses, powerful reasoning, and outstanding cost efficiency. 🎁 Still 100% FREE on From high-frequency API calls and coding to complex Agents and long-document processing, jump in and experience the #1 model on for yourself! 👉 Try it free now:

🔥 GLM-5.3-Flash Hits #1 on 🐮 GLM-5.3-Flash (Ox Alpha) is now the most-used and most popular model on with cumulative token throughput surpassing 2.41 trillion tokens. As the first native omni-modal model in the GLM-5 series, it packs 320B total parameters, with 18B active, and features a hybrid sparse and linear attention architecture with a 1M-token context window. The result: lightning-fast responses, powerful reasoning, and outstanding cost efficiency. 🎁 Still 100% FREE on From high-frequency API calls and coding to complex Agents and long-document processing, jump in and experience the #1 model on for yourself! 👉 Try it free now:

B.AI

222,739 просмотров • 1 месяц назад