Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

1. Realistic Physics Game (Hexagon Test) Prompt: Create a HTML, CSS, and javascript where a ball is inside a rotating hexagon. The ball is affected by Earth’s gravity and friction from the hexagon walls. The bouncing must appear realistic. → Tests physics simulation, code planning, and visual realism. ChatGPT... show more

Alex Veremeyenko

98,594 subscribers

563,545 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

chatgpt (4o) update prompt: write a program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically

chatgpt (4o) update prompt: write a program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically

AK

326,275 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct prompt: write a p5.js script that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically

llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct prompt: write a p5.js script that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically

AK

118,407 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I've tested them all... and I think the winner is obvious 👀 "write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically"

I've tested them all... and I think the winner is obvious 👀 "write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically"

Flavio Adamo

966,115 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 o3-mini crushed DeepSeek R1 🚨 "write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically"

🚨 o3-mini crushed DeepSeek R1 🚨 "write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically"

Flavio Adamo

5,040,561 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

o3-mini but with 10 balls prompt: write a script that shows 10 balls bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The balls should be affected by gravity and friction, and must bounce off the rotating walls realistically

o3-mini but with 10 balls prompt: write a script that shows 10 balls bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The balls should be affected by gravity and friction, and must bounce off the rotating walls realistically

AK

26,460 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Testleri yaptım; Cursor’da Plan’sız olarak direk Agent modülüyle yaptım. 👑 Gemini 3 Pro Hız, Maliyet ve Kalite’de açık ara en iyi çıktı bence. ☠️ GPT 5.1 Codex High Fast çalışan bir çıktı bile veremedi… 🧠 En iyi Planlamayı Claude Modelleri yaptı. Hız sıralaması; - Gemini 3 Pro > Opus4.1 > Sonnet4.5 > GPT-5.1-Codex High Fast Test Prompt: Write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically.

Testleri yaptım; Cursor’da Plan’sız olarak direk Agent modülüyle yaptım. 👑 Gemini 3 Pro Hız, Maliyet ve Kalite’de açık ara en iyi çıktı bence. ☠️ GPT 5.1 Codex High Fast çalışan bir çıktı bile veremedi… 🧠 En iyi Planlamayı Claude Modelleri yaptı. Hız sıralaması; - Gemini 3 Pro > Opus4.1 > Sonnet4.5 > GPT-5.1-Codex High Fast Test Prompt: Write a Python program that shows a ball bouncing inside a spinning hexagon. The ball should be affected by gravity and friction, and it must bounce off the rotating walls realistically.

Alican Kiraz

149,106 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Gemini 2.5 Flash demolishes my Galton Board test, I could not get 4omini, 4o mini high, or 03 to produce this. I found that Gemini 2.5 Flash understands my intents almost instantly, code produced is tight and neat. The prompt is a merging of various steps. It took me 5 steps to achieve this in Gemini 2.5 Flash, I gave up on OpenAI models after about half an hour. My iterations are obviously not exact. But people can test with this one prompt for more objective comparison. Please try this prompt on your end to confirm: -------------------------------------------------- Create a self-contained HTML file for a Galton board simulation using client-side JavaScript and a 2D physics engine (like Matter.js, included via CDN). The simulation should be rendered on an HTML5 canvas and meet the following criteria: 1. **Single File:** All necessary HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code must be within this single `.html` file. 2. **Canvas Size:** The overall simulation area (canvas) should be reasonably sized to fit on a standard screen without requiring extensive scrolling or zooming (e.g., around 500x700 pixels). 3. **Physics:** Utilize a 2D rigid body physics engine for realistic ball-peg and ball-wall interactions. 4. **Obstacles (Pegs):** Create static, circular pegs arranged in full-width horizontal rows extending across the usable width of the board (not just a triangle). The pegs should be small enough and spaced appropriately for balls to navigate and bounce between them. 5. **Containment:** * Include static, sufficiently thick side walls and a ground at the bottom to contain the balls within the board. * Implement *physical* static dividers between the collection bins at the bottom. These dividers must be thick enough to prevent balls from passing through them, ensuring accurate accumulation in each bin. 6. **Ball Dropping:** Balls should be dropped from a controlled, narrow area near the horizontal center at the top of the board to ensure they enter the peg field consistently. 7. **Bins:** The collection area at the bottom should be divided into distinct bins by the physical dividers. The height of the bins should be sufficient to clearly visualize the accumulation of balls. 8. **Visualization:** Use a high-contrast color scheme to clearly distinguish between elements. Specifically, use yellow for the structural elements (walls, top guides, physical bin dividers, ground), a contrasting color (like red) for the pegs, and a highly contrasting color (like dark grey or black) for the balls. 9. **Demonstration:** The simulation should visually demonstrate the formation of the normal (or binomial) distribution as multiple balls fall through the pegs and collect in the bins. Ensure the physics parameters (restitution, friction, density) and ball drop rate are tuned for a smooth and clear demonstration of the distribution. #OpenAI Sam Altman Greg Brockman AshutoshShrivastava Aidan McLaughlin

Gemini 2.5 Flash demolishes my Galton Board test, I could not get 4omini, 4o mini high, or 03 to produce this. I found that Gemini 2.5 Flash understands my intents almost instantly, code produced is tight and neat. The prompt is a merging of various steps. It took me 5 steps to achieve this in Gemini 2.5 Flash, I gave up on OpenAI models after about half an hour. My iterations are obviously not exact. But people can test with this one prompt for more objective comparison. Please try this prompt on your end to confirm: -------------------------------------------------- Create a self-contained HTML file for a Galton board simulation using client-side JavaScript and a 2D physics engine (like Matter.js, included via CDN). The simulation should be rendered on an HTML5 canvas and meet the following criteria: 1. Single File: All necessary HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code must be within this single `.html` file. 2. Canvas Size: The overall simulation area (canvas) should be reasonably sized to fit on a standard screen without requiring extensive scrolling or zooming (e.g., around 500x700 pixels). 3. Physics: Utilize a 2D rigid body physics engine for realistic ball-peg and ball-wall interactions. 4. Obstacles (Pegs): Create static, circular pegs arranged in full-width horizontal rows extending across the usable width of the board (not just a triangle). The pegs should be small enough and spaced appropriately for balls to navigate and bounce between them. 5. Containment: * Include static, sufficiently thick side walls and a ground at the bottom to contain the balls within the board. * Implement physical static dividers between the collection bins at the bottom. These dividers must be thick enough to prevent balls from passing through them, ensuring accurate accumulation in each bin. 6. Ball Dropping: Balls should be dropped from a controlled, narrow area near the horizontal center at the top of the board to ensure they enter the peg field consistently. 7. Bins: The collection area at the bottom should be divided into distinct bins by the physical dividers. The height of the bins should be sufficient to clearly visualize the accumulation of balls. 8. Visualization: Use a high-contrast color scheme to clearly distinguish between elements. Specifically, use yellow for the structural elements (walls, top guides, physical bin dividers, ground), a contrasting color (like red) for the pegs, and a highly contrasting color (like dark grey or black) for the balls. 9. Demonstration: The simulation should visually demonstrate the formation of the normal (or binomial) distribution as multiple balls fall through the pegs and collect in the bins. Ensure the physics parameters (restitution, friction, density) and ball drop rate are tuned for a smooth and clear demonstration of the distribution. #OpenAI Sam Altman Greg Brockman AshutoshShrivastava Aidan McLaughlin

RameshR

247,923 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

STEPS: – Go to ChatGPT and write a situation based on your idea. – Ask it to refine the situation, make any necessary edits, and turn it into a complete story. – Ask ChatGPT to create a 30-second scenario from your story. – Then ask ChatGPT to turn that scenario into a 12–15 frame storyboard. – Upload the storyboard to ChatGPT and ask it to turn the storyboard into a detailed video prompt. – Finally, upload the storyboard to Seedance, copy the video prompt, and paste it into Seedance. – Within 5–6 minutes, you can have a complete video based on your original idea. P.S. Like, repost, and bookmark! . . .

STEPS: – Go to ChatGPT and write a situation based on your idea. – Ask it to refine the situation, make any necessary edits, and turn it into a complete story. – Ask ChatGPT to create a 30-second scenario from your story. – Then ask ChatGPT to turn that scenario into a 12–15 frame storyboard. – Upload the storyboard to ChatGPT and ask it to turn the storyboard into a detailed video prompt. – Finally, upload the storyboard to Seedance, copy the video prompt, and paste it into Seedance. – Within 5–6 minutes, you can have a complete video based on your original idea. P.S. Like, repost, and bookmark! . . .

Beginnersblog

15,857 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

⚡ My first advanced simulation with Grok 3! Finally your OS windows act like REAL windows 🤣 As you know, I've spent more than 2 years sharing all kinds of simulations and mini-games made with Claude, ChatGPT (o3-mini-high), etc. It’s been ages since I last wrote a single line of code. But pretty often, once you hit over 1,000 lines, it turns into a debate against the LLM and you frequently get stuck in a loop that’s hard to break out of. Everyone was raving about Grok 3’s ability to generate code, but until now, I hadn’t really put it to the test. So I decided to challenge it with a prompt that both ChatGPT and Claude were seriously struggling with (debate loop). The initial prompt was: "Use Python and a 2D physics library to create a world where I can generate different static objects like squares, triangles, circles and rectangles. I should be able to move them with the mouse, rotate, scale, and delete them. The cool part is that we’ll see this world through 1 to N operating system windows. In other words, the windows will be like real windows! When one of these windows is active and I hit the spacebar, balls affected by physics should appear and interact with the static objects. You can start with placeholders, but later I'll send you a series of PNG images so they all become beautiful sprites." After a few iterations, I got the result you see in the video. Insane, right? 🤯 Now, with Grok, we have the power to create anything that pops into our mind with just a couple of prompts. It’s mind blowing. Ever since I was 9 and messing around with BASIC on my MSX, I've been hooked on visual simulations... And now I can create them using nothing but natural language. It's f***** amazing that we're living in this historic moment!

⚡ My first advanced simulation with Grok 3! Finally your OS windows act like REAL windows 🤣 As you know, I've spent more than 2 years sharing all kinds of simulations and mini-games made with Claude, ChatGPT (o3-mini-high), etc. It’s been ages since I last wrote a single line of code. But pretty often, once you hit over 1,000 lines, it turns into a debate against the LLM and you frequently get stuck in a loop that’s hard to break out of. Everyone was raving about Grok 3’s ability to generate code, but until now, I hadn’t really put it to the test. So I decided to challenge it with a prompt that both ChatGPT and Claude were seriously struggling with (debate loop). The initial prompt was: "Use Python and a 2D physics library to create a world where I can generate different static objects like squares, triangles, circles and rectangles. I should be able to move them with the mouse, rotate, scale, and delete them. The cool part is that we’ll see this world through 1 to N operating system windows. In other words, the windows will be like real windows! When one of these windows is active and I hit the spacebar, balls affected by physics should appear and interact with the static objects. You can start with placeholders, but later I'll send you a series of PNG images so they all become beautiful sprites." After a few iterations, I got the result you see in the video. Insane, right? 🤯 Now, with Grok, we have the power to create anything that pops into our mind with just a couple of prompts. It’s mind blowing. Ever since I was 9 and messing around with BASIC on my MSX, I've been hooked on visual simulations... And now I can create them using nothing but natural language. It's f***** amazing that we're living in this historic moment!

Javi Lopez ⛩️

209,470 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I built a website for a clothing brand in less than 10 minutes and here’s how you can do it too. Step 1: describe your idea in chatGPT Step 2: go into lovable (an AI website builder) and paste the prompt given by ChatGPT and watch the magic happen. With the free 2 months subscription that Omoalhaja gave a couple of days ago you can play around and generate cool stuff You’re welcome🎉

Mustang

14,598 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

this is hands down the best way to learn how to use AI... feed ChatGPT with 5 books about AI and make it create an interactive course tailored to your business i just wrote a guide containing: - the 5 essential books to import inside a ChatGPT project - a super-prompt to build your custom interactive course - a guide to leverage this for your specific situation reply "BOOKS" + follow me and i'll dm this to you for FREE

this is hands down the best way to learn how to use AI... feed ChatGPT with 5 books about AI and make it create an interactive course tailored to your business i just wrote a guide containing: - the 5 essential books to import inside a ChatGPT project - a super-prompt to build your custom interactive course - a guide to leverage this for your specific situation reply "BOOKS" + follow me and i'll dm this to you for FREE

Machina

17,417 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

New body-physics test for the best AI video tools: The newly released Grok Imagine 1.5, the king Seedance 2.0, Google’s “revolutionary super-duper” Gemini Omni Flash, and the old-timer Kling 3.0 Pro. This time I tested how each model handles realistic running motion, body movement, fabric physics, and natural secondary motion. And the result was much less obvious than I expected. Believe it or not, I can’t call Seedance the clear winner this time. Each model got several attempts. - Grok Imagine 1.5: The new version is finally available on the official Grok website, so I could properly test it. Honestly, I didn’t notice a massive improvement over the previous version. Still, the result was acceptable. It produced the most cartoonish image, and the woman runs as if she’s wearing heels, but the body physics were decent enough. It also understood the instructions quickly and followed them correctly. - Kling 3.0 Pro: The old man decided to test my patience. It repeatedly blocked a simple running scene as adult content, then misunderstood the instructions several times. The successful result has the most realistic lighting and frame rate, but the actual body physics look strange. It almost feels like loose foam padding is bouncing inside the leggings. There are also several visible artifacts and unnatural movements. - Gemini Omni Flash: As usual, it gave me that strange slow-motion, low-FPS look that Google models seem to love. But it didn’t censor anything, understood the instructions immediately, and produced a beautiful, realistic result. Surprisingly, this is the output I liked the most in this test. - Seedance 2.0: Seedance also blocked a couple of generations, just like Kling, but eventually produced a strong result. It delivered the most beautiful and visually appealing footage, but I honestly expected better physics. The video looks great, yet I can’t confidently call it the most physically accurate result. - My ranking: 1. Gemini Omni Flash — not perfect, but the best overall result for me 2. Seedance 2.0 — visually stunning, but I preferred Omni’s physics 3. Grok Imagine 1.5 — cartoonish look and strange running, but still acceptable 4. Kling 3.0 Pro — the longest wait, the strangest physics, and the most inconsistent result Do you agree with my ranking? #AIVideo

New body-physics test for the best AI video tools: The newly released Grok Imagine 1.5, the king Seedance 2.0, Google’s “revolutionary super-duper” Gemini Omni Flash, and the old-timer Kling 3.0 Pro. This time I tested how each model handles realistic running motion, body movement, fabric physics, and natural secondary motion. And the result was much less obvious than I expected. Believe it or not, I can’t call Seedance the clear winner this time. Each model got several attempts. - Grok Imagine 1.5: The new version is finally available on the official Grok website, so I could properly test it. Honestly, I didn’t notice a massive improvement over the previous version. Still, the result was acceptable. It produced the most cartoonish image, and the woman runs as if she’s wearing heels, but the body physics were decent enough. It also understood the instructions quickly and followed them correctly. - Kling 3.0 Pro: The old man decided to test my patience. It repeatedly blocked a simple running scene as adult content, then misunderstood the instructions several times. The successful result has the most realistic lighting and frame rate, but the actual body physics look strange. It almost feels like loose foam padding is bouncing inside the leggings. There are also several visible artifacts and unnatural movements. - Gemini Omni Flash: As usual, it gave me that strange slow-motion, low-FPS look that Google models seem to love. But it didn’t censor anything, understood the instructions immediately, and produced a beautiful, realistic result. Surprisingly, this is the output I liked the most in this test. - Seedance 2.0: Seedance also blocked a couple of generations, just like Kling, but eventually produced a strong result. It delivered the most beautiful and visually appealing footage, but I honestly expected better physics. The video looks great, yet I can’t confidently call it the most physically accurate result. - My ranking: 1. Gemini Omni Flash — not perfect, but the best overall result for me 2. Seedance 2.0 — visually stunning, but I preferred Omni’s physics 3. Grok Imagine 1.5 — cartoonish look and strange running, but still acceptable 4. Kling 3.0 Pro — the longest wait, the strangest physics, and the most inconsistent result Do you agree with my ranking? #AIVideo

Alpha Mom

155,583 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I am often asked how has AI changed the way that I work. Two ways: I do not ever type emails. Wispr Flow perfectly transcribes them. Structures them. Spelling of names is perfect. Could not live without Wispr both on iOS and desktop. Every single 20VC show we now run the same prompt into Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT and Grok to help us create questions and schedules for the show. 12 Months Ago: (Best to Worst) 1. ChatGPT 2. Claude 3. Grok 4. Gemini Today: (Best to Worst) 1. Gemini (By far) 2. Grok 3. Claude 4. ChatGPT Btw, I use Flow to do the best and most detailed prompts on all of the above. The times they are a changing…

I am often asked how has AI changed the way that I work. Two ways: I do not ever type emails. Wispr Flow perfectly transcribes them. Structures them. Spelling of names is perfect. Could not live without Wispr both on iOS and desktop. Every single 20VC show we now run the same prompt into Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT and Grok to help us create questions and schedules for the show. 12 Months Ago: (Best to Worst) 1. ChatGPT 2. Claude 3. Grok 4. Gemini Today: (Best to Worst) 1. Gemini (By far) 2. Grok 3. Claude 4. ChatGPT Btw, I use Flow to do the best and most detailed prompts on all of the above. The times they are a changing…

Harry Stebbings

39,790 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This is crazy man... one prompt + 4 minutes and I hit my 5 hour rate limit in the Gemini app. Here is the proof. Yesterday, I hit the rate limit the same way, so I wanted to check if it would happen again. I started with 0% usage on my 5 hour limit, then gave one simple prompt for video generation using the avatar feature. It ran for around 3 to 4 minutes, hit 100% of the rate limit, and the video generation failed as well.

AshutoshShrivastava

82,497 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce