Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

1/ The Government's 'text and data mining' exception to UK copyright law would have left those in creative industries without legal control over their work, should it have been used by an AI platform. I therefore held a debate today to highlight the importance of this issue.

Sarah Olney

18,571 subscribers

470,984 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Eğitim Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Yorum

Sarah Olney profil fotoğrafı

Sarah Olney3 yıl önce

2/ I am extremely pleased to say that in response, the Minister confirmed to me that these plans will be halted, pending further consultation. This is a huge win for millions employed in creative spaces across the UK, and I look forward to seeing the updated proposals.

Jon Lam #CreateDontScrape profil fotoğrafı

Jon Lam #CreateDontScrape3 yıl önce

Thank you Sarah!!! This was an amazing speech. I am an artist that works in the creative sector in Canada and America, and what you have debated and spoken about is crucial for humanity, creativity and the economy.

MystWolven profil fotoğrafı

MystWolven3 yıl önce

Thank you so much for caring about this issue and taking it seriously. It's pretty scary here in the U.S. right now.

SaMan profil fotoğrafı

SaMan3 yıl önce

thank you 🙏🏻 I've seen to may visual artists from all over the world frustrated and even afraid about what the future holds for them many of them have felt like they are not being heard but that doesn't seem to be the case anymore. i hope you understand my English.

I have no inside voice 🤷🏻‍♀️. profil fotoğrafı

I have no inside voice 🤷🏻‍♀️.3 yıl önce

This is wonderful! I’m so glad government in the UK is taking this seriously and is willing to listen to the people fighting exploitation in the creative community.

Claire profil fotoğrafı

Claire3 yıl önce

Seeing brave legislators such as you fighting for the rights and dignity of creatives in the UK is a welcome sight to behold. Your actions will impact others across the globe in a positive way, hopefully! 😃😃😃

Sanctum1972 profil fotoğrafı

Sanctum19723 yıl önce

Hats off to you Sarah! Your stance and defense for the creative arts aka human artist is greatly appreciated!

Matt profil fotoğrafı

Matt3 yıl önce

Thank you so much for this Sarah. It means the absolute world.

Kevin Sargent profil fotoğrafı

Kevin Sargent3 yıl önce

Thank you for bringing this, Sarah. Britain's world-beating creative sector deserves protection from potentially extractive tech.

Benzer Videolar

Baroness Kidron may have saved the UK's creative industries with her speech in the House of Lords today. She managed to get the House of Lords to approve her amendments to the Data (Use and Access) Bill, which among other things requires overseas gen AI companies to respect UK copyright law if they sell their products in the UK. (As a reminder, it is illegal to train commercial gen AI models on ©️ work without a licence in the UK.) What's astonishing is that her amendments passed despite The Labour Party reportedly being whipped to vote against them, and the Conservatives largely abstaining. Essentially, Labour voted against the amendments, and *everyone else who voted* voted to protect copyright holders. This should give you some sense of the strength of feeling over the government's plans to upend copyright law to favour AI companies. The bill still has to go through the Commons. But, as it stands, it would require generative AI companies selling their products in the UK to license any copyrighted training data they use. This is what standing up for the creative industries looks like. I strongly suggest you watch her entire speech. (If you want to read it instead, the link to the transcript is in the first reply ⬇️)

Baroness Kidron may have saved the UK's creative industries with her speech in the House of Lords today. She managed to get the House of Lords to approve her amendments to the Data (Use and Access) Bill, which among other things requires overseas gen AI companies to respect UK copyright law if they sell their products in the UK. (As a reminder, it is illegal to train commercial gen AI models on ©️ work without a licence in the UK.) What's astonishing is that her amendments passed despite The Labour Party reportedly being whipped to vote against them, and the Conservatives largely abstaining. Essentially, Labour voted against the amendments, and everyone else who voted voted to protect copyright holders. This should give you some sense of the strength of feeling over the government's plans to upend copyright law to favour AI companies. The bill still has to go through the Commons. But, as it stands, it would require generative AI companies selling their products in the UK to license any copyrighted training data they use. This is what standing up for the creative industries looks like. I strongly suggest you watch her entire speech. (If you want to read it instead, the link to the transcript is in the first reply ⬇️)

Ed Newton-Rex

153,907 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 It looks like the UK government is gearing up to upend copyright law in favour of AI companies, legalising the theft of their work. This is despite creatives' huge protests, and despite previous proposals being roundly rejected by the public. There are rumours it is considering introducing a 'commercial research exception' for AI training. This would be disastrous. It would mean handing the life's work of British creatives to AI companies for free, to train their models on. In the House of Lords today, a government minister refused to rule this out. To be clear, this would amount to legalising theft. It would fly in the face of public opinion on what is fair, and would mean a surrender of British creatives' work by this Labour government. It would mean the lobbying by big US tech firms had succeeded, and the protests of the UK's creatives had been ignored. People's work is not the government's to give away. If you're in the UK and you care about creatives and the creative industries, please write to your MP!

🚨 It looks like the UK government is gearing up to upend copyright law in favour of AI companies, legalising the theft of their work. This is despite creatives' huge protests, and despite previous proposals being roundly rejected by the public. There are rumours it is considering introducing a 'commercial research exception' for AI training. This would be disastrous. It would mean handing the life's work of British creatives to AI companies for free, to train their models on. In the House of Lords today, a government minister refused to rule this out. To be clear, this would amount to legalising theft. It would fly in the face of public opinion on what is fair, and would mean a surrender of British creatives' work by this Labour government. It would mean the lobbying by big US tech firms had succeeded, and the protests of the UK's creatives had been ignored. People's work is not the government's to give away. If you're in the UK and you care about creatives and the creative industries, please write to your MP!

Ed Newton-Rex

263,952 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

I gave evidence on AI + the creative industries to the UK Parliament's Culture, Media and Sport Committee today. One thing we discussed was how the UK can lead in AI without upending ©️ law and destroying the creative industries (IMO certainly possible).

I gave evidence on AI + the creative industries to the UK Parliament's Culture, Media and Sport Committee today. One thing we discussed was how the UK can lead in AI without upending ©️ law and destroying the creative industries (IMO certainly possible).

Ed Newton-Rex

12,424 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

And there you have it. After having to modify a lot of hard-coded values and find multiple pointer tables to make text work and expandable, it's done. Time to script this all in, after which we have full control over the scripting files used in the game.

And there you have it. After having to modify a lot of hard-coded values and find multiple pointer tables to make text work and expandable, it's done. Time to script this all in, after which we have full control over the scripting files used in the game.

Yuvi

20,047 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Lexi Love at CA AI and Copyright Hearing | Support for AB-412 Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Lexi Love delivers public comment at the California Joint Informational Hearing on Artificial Intelligence and Copyright, addressing the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee in support of AB-412. A SAG-AFTRA actor, AI architect, and awarded social justice activist known for Scola v. Facebook, Lexi Love describes how her image and likeness were used without consent to develop, distribute, and monetize a NSFW AI product that generated approximately $30,000 per month. The product was discontinued following trademark enforcement. Her experience demonstrates the risks artists and creative workers face when AI systems are built without transparency regarding training datasets. AB-412 establishes foundational disclosure requirements to protect creators, promote accountability, and strengthen AI governance in California. For more on this issue see: "The use of copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence (AI) models has sparked significant legal and ethical debate. Generative AI (GenAI), in particular, can produce text, images, video, or audio that emulates the expressive works used to train it. Key concerns include whether training on copyrighted material without permission constitutes fair use or copyright infringement, particularly when models can sometimes reproduce portions of their training data. Content creators argue they should be compensated when their work is used to train commercial AI systems, while some worry that AI-generated content could compete with and displace original creative works. There are also questions about transparency – many users and creators are unaware of which copyrighted materials were included in training datasets. Over 50 lawsuits from authors, artists, and publishers are currently testing these issues in court, seeking to establish clearer legal boundaries around AI training practices. The debate balances innovation and the advancement of AI technology against intellectual property rights and the economic interests of content creators. A number of novel approaches to handling these issues have been explored internationally, including in the European Union, Japan, and Australia, and other approaches have been discussed and proposed by leading academics.” - Background Paper By the Staff of the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee #AI #Copyright #AB412 #SAGAFTRA #LexiLove

Lexi Love at CA AI and Copyright Hearing | Support for AB-412 Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Lexi Love delivers public comment at the California Joint Informational Hearing on Artificial Intelligence and Copyright, addressing the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee in support of AB-412. A SAG-AFTRA actor, AI architect, and awarded social justice activist known for Scola v. Facebook, Lexi Love describes how her image and likeness were used without consent to develop, distribute, and monetize a NSFW AI product that generated approximately $30,000 per month. The product was discontinued following trademark enforcement. Her experience demonstrates the risks artists and creative workers face when AI systems are built without transparency regarding training datasets. AB-412 establishes foundational disclosure requirements to protect creators, promote accountability, and strengthen AI governance in California. For more on this issue see: "The use of copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence (AI) models has sparked significant legal and ethical debate. Generative AI (GenAI), in particular, can produce text, images, video, or audio that emulates the expressive works used to train it. Key concerns include whether training on copyrighted material without permission constitutes fair use or copyright infringement, particularly when models can sometimes reproduce portions of their training data. Content creators argue they should be compensated when their work is used to train commercial AI systems, while some worry that AI-generated content could compete with and displace original creative works. There are also questions about transparency – many users and creators are unaware of which copyrighted materials were included in training datasets. Over 50 lawsuits from authors, artists, and publishers are currently testing these issues in court, seeking to establish clearer legal boundaries around AI training practices. The debate balances innovation and the advancement of AI technology against intellectual property rights and the economic interests of content creators. A number of novel approaches to handling these issues have been explored internationally, including in the European Union, Japan, and Australia, and other approaches have been discussed and proposed by leading academics.” - Background Paper By the Staff of the Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee #AI #Copyright #AB412 #SAGAFTRA #LexiLove

Lexi Love ®

39,999 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Today, I held a press conference to discuss the dangers of THC and the unregulated products that have taken over our state. Watch my latest video on SB 3 and the importance of this vital legislation becoming law: #txlege

Today, I held a press conference to discuss the dangers of THC and the unregulated products that have taken over our state. Watch my latest video on SB 3 and the importance of this vital legislation becoming law: #txlege

Office of the Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick

563,312 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"The arts & the creative industries are not a nice to have...I want this for every single kid in this country." Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Minister Chris Bryant on the importance of a creative education. Find out more about how UK Music supports music education here:

"The arts & the creative industries are not a nice to have...I want this for every single kid in this country." Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Minister Chris Bryant on the importance of a creative education. Find out more about how UK Music supports music education here:

UK Music

39,520 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Chris Bryant today all but admitted why the government refuses to accept legislation that makes AI companies reveal their training data: They are going to offer creators transparency legislation *later*, in return for upending copyright law & letting AI companies train on people's life's work without permission. His justification for rejecting transparency legislation: "If we're going to get to that proper compromise solution [between creators and AI companies], it's going to require all the bits of the jigsaw to be put together into a comprehensive picture." That is: if creators want to know when AI companies are using their work, they're going to have to give up their rights. There is no other way of interpreting this comment I can think of. He is saying creators can't get transparency from AI companies without giving something up. And there is nothing to give up except their current rights under the law, which compel AI companies to ask their permission before using their work. Bryant & co. have given no other reason to reject transparency legislation. AI companies are breaking the law, and government refuses to hold them to account. IMO this is awful treatment of the creative sector by the government. Commercial generative AI training on copyrighted work without a license is illegal in the UK; creators cannot enforce their rights, because training happens behind closed doors; the government won't empower creators to enforce their rights without requiring them to give up other rights. Bookmark this. I hope I'm wrong, and that this is not the government's plan - but I see no other conclusion you can draw from Chris Bryant's words here.

Chris Bryant today all but admitted why the government refuses to accept legislation that makes AI companies reveal their training data: They are going to offer creators transparency legislation later, in return for upending copyright law & letting AI companies train on people's life's work without permission. His justification for rejecting transparency legislation: "If we're going to get to that proper compromise solution [between creators and AI companies], it's going to require all the bits of the jigsaw to be put together into a comprehensive picture." That is: if creators want to know when AI companies are using their work, they're going to have to give up their rights. There is no other way of interpreting this comment I can think of. He is saying creators can't get transparency from AI companies without giving something up. And there is nothing to give up except their current rights under the law, which compel AI companies to ask their permission before using their work. Bryant & co. have given no other reason to reject transparency legislation. AI companies are breaking the law, and government refuses to hold them to account. IMO this is awful treatment of the creative sector by the government. Commercial generative AI training on copyrighted work without a license is illegal in the UK; creators cannot enforce their rights, because training happens behind closed doors; the government won't empower creators to enforce their rights without requiring them to give up other rights. Bookmark this. I hope I'm wrong, and that this is not the government's plan - but I see no other conclusion you can draw from Chris Bryant's words here.

Ed Newton-Rex

24,101 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I’ve never been one to encourage disrupting the continuity of Bond, but I would have absolutely made an exception for Sean Connery to play Kincade in Skyfall. The idea gives me goosebumps, and I truly think it would have been a beautiful way to honor the man who started it all.

I’ve never been one to encourage disrupting the continuity of Bond, but I would have absolutely made an exception for Sean Connery to play Kincade in Skyfall. The idea gives me goosebumps, and I truly think it would have been a beautiful way to honor the man who started it all.

Just Another Bond Fanatic

61,370 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

#WATCH | Leader of Congress in Lok Sabha, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury says, "The new copies of the Constitution that were given to us today (19th September), the one we held in our hands and entered (the new Parliament building), its Preamble doesn't have the words 'socialist secular'. We know that the words were added after an amendment in 1976 but if someone gives us the Constitution today and it doesn't have those words, it is a matter of concern...Their intention is suspicious. It has been done cleverly. It is a matter of concern for me. I tried to raise this issue but I did not get an opportunity to raise this issue..."

#WATCH | Leader of Congress in Lok Sabha, Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury says, "The new copies of the Constitution that were given to us today (19th September), the one we held in our hands and entered (the new Parliament building), its Preamble doesn't have the words 'socialist secular'. We know that the words were added after an amendment in 1976 but if someone gives us the Constitution today and it doesn't have those words, it is a matter of concern...Their intention is suspicious. It has been done cleverly. It is a matter of concern for me. I tried to raise this issue but I did not get an opportunity to raise this issue..."

ANI

405,166 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Should Creatives Be Worried? Reflections on the Copyright Bill Debate. Parliament debated the Copyright Amendment Bill 12.03.26 during its 2nd reading, & the discussion raised several concerns. 1-The Rt. Hon. Speaker AAA asked why radio stations like her own mama bukedea should pay royalties to creators (artists) yet the stations are already promoting their work by playing their music. 2-Another MP argued that artists themselves often pay DJs and media hosts to promote their music, questioning why radio stations should still be required to pay royalties. 3-One submission called for a cost benefit analysis of the bill to clearly show what Artists stand to gain or lose if the law is passed. 4-Concerns were also raised about artists who may want their music promoted for free without media houses paying royalties. Dont they have liberty to choose? 5-Another MP argued that once an artist releases their music, it becomes public, and therefore people should be free to use it however way they wish without payment. 6-A further suggestion was that if artists want this bill passed, government should also begin taxing their revenue & income from public performances sighting zero tax compliance yet they want to be paid. The debate was eventually cut short due to a lack of quorum. However, a few observations stood out: 1-The debate focused mainly on music, overlooking the wider creative industries that copyright laws protect. 2-Some MPs seemed unaware that copyright protection is already a global standard for safeguarding creators’ rights. 3-It is unclear whether the proposed amendment was benchmarked against international markets with established copyright systems, since it does not introduce a new concept. 4-what Should be be the middle ground between media owners and creatives Without strong copyright protections, creatives may continue depending on occasional government support instead of earning sustainable income from their intellectual property. So i ask: should creatives be worried yet or you sense good will of passing the copyright amendment law? Dear creatives Watch👇🏻 Lets discuss. #NBSAfter5 Video credit : UBC UGANDA

Should Creatives Be Worried? Reflections on the Copyright Bill Debate. Parliament debated the Copyright Amendment Bill 12.03.26 during its 2nd reading, & the discussion raised several concerns. 1-The Rt. Hon. Speaker AAA asked why radio stations like her own mama bukedea should pay royalties to creators (artists) yet the stations are already promoting their work by playing their music. 2-Another MP argued that artists themselves often pay DJs and media hosts to promote their music, questioning why radio stations should still be required to pay royalties. 3-One submission called for a cost benefit analysis of the bill to clearly show what Artists stand to gain or lose if the law is passed. 4-Concerns were also raised about artists who may want their music promoted for free without media houses paying royalties. Dont they have liberty to choose? 5-Another MP argued that once an artist releases their music, it becomes public, and therefore people should be free to use it however way they wish without payment. 6-A further suggestion was that if artists want this bill passed, government should also begin taxing their revenue & income from public performances sighting zero tax compliance yet they want to be paid. The debate was eventually cut short due to a lack of quorum. However, a few observations stood out: 1-The debate focused mainly on music, overlooking the wider creative industries that copyright laws protect. 2-Some MPs seemed unaware that copyright protection is already a global standard for safeguarding creators’ rights. 3-It is unclear whether the proposed amendment was benchmarked against international markets with established copyright systems, since it does not introduce a new concept. 4-what Should be be the middle ground between media owners and creatives Without strong copyright protections, creatives may continue depending on occasional government support instead of earning sustainable income from their intellectual property. So i ask: should creatives be worried yet or you sense good will of passing the copyright amendment law? Dear creatives Watch👇🏻 Lets discuss. #NBSAfter5 Video credit : UBC UGANDA

Douglas Lwanga

49,831 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

"The only people that have an issue with our copyright laws are the AI tech giants who find that they get in their way of what they want to do." MP Pete Wishart on the impact Government proposals on AI and copyright could have on the music industry.

"The only people that have an issue with our copyright laws are the AI tech giants who find that they get in their way of what they want to do." MP Pete Wishart on the impact Government proposals on AI and copyright could have on the music industry.

UK Music

26,305 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Thought I would do something random today to support a builder on Base The platform the team at $checkr have built and continue to improve in my opinion should be used by builders, founding team and communities on a daily basis. We ❤️ it at METACADE

Thought I would do something random today to support a builder on Base The platform the team at $checkr have built and continue to improve in my opinion should be used by builders, founding team and communities on a daily basis. We ❤️ it at METACADE

russ.base.eth

10,632 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Speculation that the Holiday Inn Express hotel in Rhoose will be used to house Afghans is deeply concerning. I've been contacted by several constituents about this, who are understandably and legitimately concerned. There have also been several reports on social media. As an elected member representing the area, authorities have told me nothing about this. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no public statement issued by the Ministry of Defence. This is unacceptable. Speculation has been ongoing for several days, and an information vacuum has inevitably developed. I therefore wanted to take the opportunity to explain the actions I have undertaken to address this. I have written to the MOD asking them to clarify the situation urgently. To clarify my position, if speculation is correct, I would strongly and categorically oppose the hotel being used for suggested purpose. It is not suitable to provide accomodation of this nature. The hotel was built to provide accomodation for airport passengers. As a result, the vast majority of guests would, in practice, stay at the hotel for a maximum of one night, either before or after their flight. As such, they would not access local NHS services, schools or other public services. This would not be the case if the hotel is used in the manner suggested. By contrast, it would put huge pressure on local amenities and other public services. It is also situated close to a new college that is set to open. If the reports are true, then the plans would have been developed without any consultation with residents. This too would be unacceptable. They should be afforded the opportunity to provide feedback, have their say and raise any concerns they may have. When I receive further updates, I will update residents accordingly. Be assured I will always put the local community first.

Speculation that the Holiday Inn Express hotel in Rhoose will be used to house Afghans is deeply concerning. I've been contacted by several constituents about this, who are understandably and legitimately concerned. There have also been several reports on social media. As an elected member representing the area, authorities have told me nothing about this. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no public statement issued by the Ministry of Defence. This is unacceptable. Speculation has been ongoing for several days, and an information vacuum has inevitably developed. I therefore wanted to take the opportunity to explain the actions I have undertaken to address this. I have written to the MOD asking them to clarify the situation urgently. To clarify my position, if speculation is correct, I would strongly and categorically oppose the hotel being used for suggested purpose. It is not suitable to provide accomodation of this nature. The hotel was built to provide accomodation for airport passengers. As a result, the vast majority of guests would, in practice, stay at the hotel for a maximum of one night, either before or after their flight. As such, they would not access local NHS services, schools or other public services. This would not be the case if the hotel is used in the manner suggested. By contrast, it would put huge pressure on local amenities and other public services. It is also situated close to a new college that is set to open. If the reports are true, then the plans would have been developed without any consultation with residents. This too would be unacceptable. They should be afforded the opportunity to provide feedback, have their say and raise any concerns they may have. When I receive further updates, I will update residents accordingly. Be assured I will always put the local community first.

Andrew RT Davies

13,694 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This speech by James Frith MP in parliament yesterday is what it looks like to stand up for the creative industries. I hope the rest of the The Labour Party party takes note. "Proposals for new, broad exceptions to copyright—and the burden of opting out of having one’s life’s work taken without permission—undermine the very principles of copyright and of trade and commerce." Strongly encourage watching the whole thing.

This speech by James Frith MP in parliament yesterday is what it looks like to stand up for the creative industries. I hope the rest of the The Labour Party party takes note. "Proposals for new, broad exceptions to copyright—and the burden of opting out of having one’s life’s work taken without permission—undermine the very principles of copyright and of trade and commerce." Strongly encourage watching the whole thing.

Ed Newton-Rex

36,854 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Elon Musk on the importance of establishing the right values in AGI: “I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Like chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. But I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. And my opinion on AI safety is, the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking, like that you don't force the AI to believe things that are false.”

Elon Musk on the importance of establishing the right values in AGI: “I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Like chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. But I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. And my opinion on AI safety is, the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking, like that you don't force the AI to believe things that are false.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

1,010,874 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce