正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🧵 1/ There is a growing public conversation around whether UAP whistleblowers need “amnesty” before they can tell Congress what they know. That framing is understandable, but incomplete. The real issue is not whether Congress is legally allowed to receive classified information. It is. The harder issue is how... show more

Disclosure Foundation

14,599 subscribers

14,131 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"Whistleblowers, very likely, do NOT need to fear prosecution for providing classified information about Legacy programs to Congress." ~KM (IMO, this was the most important part of the Varginha Press Conference) 🔥🛸 McConnell: Eric Davis and Other Witnesses Don't Need Their NDAs Waived in Order to Spill Their Guts to Congress 🛸🔥 "No one has ever been prosecuted for providing classified information to Congress." ~KM "Congress and the American people need to hear directly from more people with firsthand knowledge of Legacy UAP programs." ~KM (Kirk McConnell spent 37 years as a professional staff member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee, the House Intelligence Committee, and the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China. ~strategicmi dot com) "I'm confident, personally, that the government would lose any serious legal challenge asserting that Congress is not authorized to receive sensitive classified information covered by executive branch non-disclosure agreements" ~KM ~ Kirk McConnell: "James (Fox) asked me to put something together today in response, in a way, to a segment of his recent film. During, as you'll see if you if you watch his recent film, you'll see that aerospace engineer Dr. Eric Davis, one of the nation's most respected experts on UAP programs, including classified programs, stated, that because of his non-disclosure agreements - NDAs - because of the obligations of his NDAs, he believes that he cannot share further information with Congress about Legacy UAP programs without explicit authorization from the executive branch." ~Here's exactly what Davis said~ Eric W. Davis: "If the President of the United States issued an executive order that absolves me of all of my TS/SCI (Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information) NDAs. NDAs are non-disclosure agreements. Those are the agreements we have to sign for every compartment in our SCI clearances. "So, if the president waives or absolves my obligation to those NDAs, and I get subpoenaed by Congress - somebody on Capitol Hill, some committee, either in the Senate or the House or both - to reveal everything I know, that I learned from my investigations, both unclassified and classified into the Legacy UAP crash retrieval and hardware reverse engineering and NHI programs? I would do so. "If I could be waived from that, or absolved in some fashion by a presidential order, and if Congress subpoenas me, yes, I would go and tell them everything I know." Source: ~End Davis Excerpt ~ McConnell: "Eric is not alone in this belief. Many, actual, and, potential, UAP whistleblowers have the same understanding of what the law and regulations require of them or prohibit them from doing. So, this question of what executive branch employees and contractors are legally permitted to disclose to Congress is actually complex, and it's not so easy to summarize the entire issue of the problems that whistleblowers face in this short segment. But I'm going to try to at least give you an idea of what's at stake and what's involved. "Equally complex and far more consequential for individuals is what can happen to those who do choose to report wrongdoing in classified programs that have been deliberately withheld from Congress. I want to outline several key points because Congress and the American people need to hear directly from more people with firsthand knowledge of Legacy UAP programs. And right now, we're consistently informed...there are many who do want to come forward who believe Congress and the public have a right to know, but who are deterred by doing so by fear. Fear rooted in, partially, at least, misunderstanding of the law, and partly also in the very real examples and experiences of retaliation to people who have come forward. "Potential whistleblowers worry about prosecution for violating NDAs, as I've mentioned. They worry about the loss, they're fearful of the loss of their security clearances, the loss of their employment, and other forms of retaliation that are very difficult and costly to challenge, even where formal avenues of appeal exist. It is true that protections for whistleblowers, particularly those handling classified, national security information, are often weak in practice, despite the fact that there are laws and regulations, ostensibly. Well, they were passed and enacted to protect whistleblowers. "Sources who possess information about U.S. government. UAP activities, or who have witnessed UAP events, have consistently reported threats to their livelihood and even their personal safety. Harassment, in some cases, has been severe. It is publicly known, for example, that figures like David Grusch and Lue Elizondo, who have not disclosed even firsthand information about Legacy programs, have faced clear retaliation. "However - and this point cannot be emphasized strongly enough - whistleblowers very likely do NOT need to fear prosecution for providing classified information about Legacy programs to Congress, provided that they do so through secure channels. That is to say, you don't just tell them in a foyer of a Capitol Hill building. You need to arrange to be in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, in a SCIF. "What I mean to say, is that laws and regulations are very clear on this point: NDAs prohibit sharing classified information with unauthorized individuals, but Congress is, by statute and regulations, an authorized recipient of classified information. NDAs cannot legally be used to withhold classified programs or associated wrongdoing from congressional oversight. This is explicit in law and regulation." (In other words, according to McConnell, any witness can walk into a SCIF tomorrow and share everything they know about UFOs with any member of Congress. And that includes information related to any Legacy UFO program they may have worked in. They might have fears of retaliation (administratively, and also via threats to their well being) but being prosecuted for speaking to Congress in a secure setting should NOT be a concern of theirs.) McConnell: "Furthermore, the executive branch is required by law to report all Special Access and compartmented programs to Congress, regardless of their sensitivity. Failure to comply with these laws is unlawful and unconstitutional, certainly in the view of Congress. NDAs cannot be used as a shield to evade these obligations." (I wonder if, right now, one or two members of Congress have already been briefed on a certain UAP Legacy program, does that meet the requirement of reporting to Congress and thus, make the program legal?) McConnell: "Now, presidents have claimed in quotes, 'Plenary Article II' authority over sensitive, national security information. Plenary, if you look it up in the dictionary, means total, unfettered, unlimited, and so on. But this is an inferred power, not an explicit constitutional grant. That is, you'll never see, you don't see language in the Constitution that states this. Congress holds equally strong Article I authorities, entitling it to the information it needs to legislate. "I'm confident, personally, that the government would lose any serious legal challenge asserting that Congress is not authorized to receive sensitive classified information covered by executive branch non-disclosure agreements. (Let's test this and send a few firsthand, hands-on whistleblowers who worked in the crash retrieval program to Congress so they can tell all, in a SCIF.) McConnell: "In reality, for the reasons cited, although officials may threaten prosecution, as far as I can tell, and those of other colleagues that I've worked with on this, no one has ever been prosecuted for providing classified information to Congress. Such a prosecution would require showing harm to national security, a claim nearly impossible to sustain when the disclosure is made to Congress itself. For these reasons, I believe the government would not pursue legal actions against whistleblowers who provide protected UAP disclosures to Congress in a secure setting, "Judges, Congress and the American people would not tolerate prosecuting individuals for revealing truths that demonstrate Congress has been misled, has been lied to, about issues of profound importance. But the fear of such such actions, this Alice-in-Wonderland dynamic, remains a powerful deterrent, and it must be addressed." (Play this video clip for every, potential, whistleblower. They need to be educated about this one aspect of the process. But we also need the first person to come forward and test it. A guinea pig, if you will. This assumes they've overcome any fear of retaliation. We know Dylan Borland didn't go through DOPSR and shared what he knows with certain members of Congress. So far, no prosecution.) McConnell: "So what can be done? There is, in fact, a straightforward solution. With the stroke of a pen and a public statement, even a social media post, the President could explicitly affirm that federal law allows protected disclosures to Congress, because Congress is an authorized recipient of classified information covered by NDAs. It could be that simple.) (Will Trump do that and allay the fears of whistleblowers so they're more likely to come forward? Doubtful, IMO.) McConnell: "If the President or his Cabinet members will not make this clear, then Congress should. In addition, congressional committees already possess the authority to grant immunity in exchange for testimony. That is to say, NDAs aside, if you appear in front of a congressional committee that has offered you immunity for your testimony, you cannot be prosecuted for doing so. "However, even if the threat of prosecution is largely a bluff, other forms of retaliation are real and damaging. These include, the fabrication or exaggeration of allegations of security violations for individuals leading to indefinite clearance investigations or revocations. Manufactured claims of misconduct for poor performance, to justify termination of employment. Black marks placed in security files preventing future employment. Reassignment, isolation, marginalization, or hostile work environments. Administrative leave, placing individuals on administrative leave, with or without pay. "For contractors, sudden quote 'changes' to government requirements that simply eliminate their position and their job. And if an individual must take another job during an appeals process, simply to survive, financially, because it takes months and months and months to grind through these appeals processes, simply to survive, financially, they may be forced to take another job. Well, if you take another job, you lose standing to pursue your case, typically "Whistleblowers can face financial ruin, as you can see, especially as legal expenses accumulate. Congress must address this fundamental problem and incentivize potential whistleblowers to come forward by establishing a rapid, assured mechanism to compensate them for lost wages and expenses." (This must happen ASAP. If they know they're going to be taken care of, financially, no matter what, it should encourage more whistleblowers to come forward.) McConnell: "Some may ask, understandably, why UAP whistleblowers deserve special consideration over other whistleblowers? The answer to me is straightforward: The stakes are extremely high when it comes to this topic, few would dispute that the discovery of non-human intelligence visiting Earth would be an event of profound significance. The executive branch appears determined to keep this information secret at the highest levels, making this a major policy decision. One that could place officials assigned to protect whistleblowers, such as Inspectors General, in direct conflict with senior policymakers." (Sharing details of what could be the most important story in the history of humanity definitely deserves special consideration.) McConnell: "These factors distinguish UAP-related disclosures from typical cases of fraud, waste and abuse. Congress may need to take a more active role, even than I've suggested so far, in protecting these individuals. Potentially, by creating and administering a dedicated restitution fund, and modifying current law to allow whistleblowers to go directly to Congress without first filing a complaint with an Inspector General." (These are great ideas that need to happen NOW!) elsewhere Thank you, Kirk. It's a complex issue. People just go, 'Well, why don't they just come forward? It's so easy.' It's actually not. So, just trying to create an environment to enable people that do want to come forward, firsthand, metal benders, people that are working in the labs. And I think it's important for not just the public to understand, but making the plea to members of Congress."

"Whistleblowers, very likely, do NOT need to fear prosecution for providing classified information about Legacy programs to Congress." ~KM (IMO, this was the most important part of the Varginha Press Conference) 🔥🛸 McConnell: Eric Davis and Other Witnesses Don't Need Their NDAs Waived in Order to Spill Their Guts to Congress 🛸🔥 "No one has ever been prosecuted for providing classified information to Congress." ~KM "Congress and the American people need to hear directly from more people with firsthand knowledge of Legacy UAP programs." ~KM (Kirk McConnell spent 37 years as a professional staff member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee, the House Intelligence Committee, and the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China. ~strategicmi dot com) "I'm confident, personally, that the government would lose any serious legal challenge asserting that Congress is not authorized to receive sensitive classified information covered by executive branch non-disclosure agreements" ~KM ~ Kirk McConnell: "James (Fox) asked me to put something together today in response, in a way, to a segment of his recent film. During, as you'll see if you if you watch his recent film, you'll see that aerospace engineer Dr. Eric Davis, one of the nation's most respected experts on UAP programs, including classified programs, stated, that because of his non-disclosure agreements - NDAs - because of the obligations of his NDAs, he believes that he cannot share further information with Congress about Legacy UAP programs without explicit authorization from the executive branch." ~Here's exactly what Davis said~ Eric W. Davis: "If the President of the United States issued an executive order that absolves me of all of my TS/SCI (Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information) NDAs. NDAs are non-disclosure agreements. Those are the agreements we have to sign for every compartment in our SCI clearances. "So, if the president waives or absolves my obligation to those NDAs, and I get subpoenaed by Congress - somebody on Capitol Hill, some committee, either in the Senate or the House or both - to reveal everything I know, that I learned from my investigations, both unclassified and classified into the Legacy UAP crash retrieval and hardware reverse engineering and NHI programs? I would do so. "If I could be waived from that, or absolved in some fashion by a presidential order, and if Congress subpoenas me, yes, I would go and tell them everything I know." Source: ~End Davis Excerpt ~ McConnell: "Eric is not alone in this belief. Many, actual, and, potential, UAP whistleblowers have the same understanding of what the law and regulations require of them or prohibit them from doing. So, this question of what executive branch employees and contractors are legally permitted to disclose to Congress is actually complex, and it's not so easy to summarize the entire issue of the problems that whistleblowers face in this short segment. But I'm going to try to at least give you an idea of what's at stake and what's involved. "Equally complex and far more consequential for individuals is what can happen to those who do choose to report wrongdoing in classified programs that have been deliberately withheld from Congress. I want to outline several key points because Congress and the American people need to hear directly from more people with firsthand knowledge of Legacy UAP programs. And right now, we're consistently informed...there are many who do want to come forward who believe Congress and the public have a right to know, but who are deterred by doing so by fear. Fear rooted in, partially, at least, misunderstanding of the law, and partly also in the very real examples and experiences of retaliation to people who have come forward. "Potential whistleblowers worry about prosecution for violating NDAs, as I've mentioned. They worry about the loss, they're fearful of the loss of their security clearances, the loss of their employment, and other forms of retaliation that are very difficult and costly to challenge, even where formal avenues of appeal exist. It is true that protections for whistleblowers, particularly those handling classified, national security information, are often weak in practice, despite the fact that there are laws and regulations, ostensibly. Well, they were passed and enacted to protect whistleblowers. "Sources who possess information about U.S. government. UAP activities, or who have witnessed UAP events, have consistently reported threats to their livelihood and even their personal safety. Harassment, in some cases, has been severe. It is publicly known, for example, that figures like David Grusch and Lue Elizondo, who have not disclosed even firsthand information about Legacy programs, have faced clear retaliation. "However - and this point cannot be emphasized strongly enough - whistleblowers very likely do NOT need to fear prosecution for providing classified information about Legacy programs to Congress, provided that they do so through secure channels. That is to say, you don't just tell them in a foyer of a Capitol Hill building. You need to arrange to be in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, in a SCIF. "What I mean to say, is that laws and regulations are very clear on this point: NDAs prohibit sharing classified information with unauthorized individuals, but Congress is, by statute and regulations, an authorized recipient of classified information. NDAs cannot legally be used to withhold classified programs or associated wrongdoing from congressional oversight. This is explicit in law and regulation." (In other words, according to McConnell, any witness can walk into a SCIF tomorrow and share everything they know about UFOs with any member of Congress. And that includes information related to any Legacy UFO program they may have worked in. They might have fears of retaliation (administratively, and also via threats to their well being) but being prosecuted for speaking to Congress in a secure setting should NOT be a concern of theirs.) McConnell: "Furthermore, the executive branch is required by law to report all Special Access and compartmented programs to Congress, regardless of their sensitivity. Failure to comply with these laws is unlawful and unconstitutional, certainly in the view of Congress. NDAs cannot be used as a shield to evade these obligations." (I wonder if, right now, one or two members of Congress have already been briefed on a certain UAP Legacy program, does that meet the requirement of reporting to Congress and thus, make the program legal?) McConnell: "Now, presidents have claimed in quotes, 'Plenary Article II' authority over sensitive, national security information. Plenary, if you look it up in the dictionary, means total, unfettered, unlimited, and so on. But this is an inferred power, not an explicit constitutional grant. That is, you'll never see, you don't see language in the Constitution that states this. Congress holds equally strong Article I authorities, entitling it to the information it needs to legislate. "I'm confident, personally, that the government would lose any serious legal challenge asserting that Congress is not authorized to receive sensitive classified information covered by executive branch non-disclosure agreements. (Let's test this and send a few firsthand, hands-on whistleblowers who worked in the crash retrieval program to Congress so they can tell all, in a SCIF.) McConnell: "In reality, for the reasons cited, although officials may threaten prosecution, as far as I can tell, and those of other colleagues that I've worked with on this, no one has ever been prosecuted for providing classified information to Congress. Such a prosecution would require showing harm to national security, a claim nearly impossible to sustain when the disclosure is made to Congress itself. For these reasons, I believe the government would not pursue legal actions against whistleblowers who provide protected UAP disclosures to Congress in a secure setting, "Judges, Congress and the American people would not tolerate prosecuting individuals for revealing truths that demonstrate Congress has been misled, has been lied to, about issues of profound importance. But the fear of such such actions, this Alice-in-Wonderland dynamic, remains a powerful deterrent, and it must be addressed." (Play this video clip for every, potential, whistleblower. They need to be educated about this one aspect of the process. But we also need the first person to come forward and test it. A guinea pig, if you will. This assumes they've overcome any fear of retaliation. We know Dylan Borland didn't go through DOPSR and shared what he knows with certain members of Congress. So far, no prosecution.) McConnell: "So what can be done? There is, in fact, a straightforward solution. With the stroke of a pen and a public statement, even a social media post, the President could explicitly affirm that federal law allows protected disclosures to Congress, because Congress is an authorized recipient of classified information covered by NDAs. It could be that simple.) (Will Trump do that and allay the fears of whistleblowers so they're more likely to come forward? Doubtful, IMO.) McConnell: "If the President or his Cabinet members will not make this clear, then Congress should. In addition, congressional committees already possess the authority to grant immunity in exchange for testimony. That is to say, NDAs aside, if you appear in front of a congressional committee that has offered you immunity for your testimony, you cannot be prosecuted for doing so. "However, even if the threat of prosecution is largely a bluff, other forms of retaliation are real and damaging. These include, the fabrication or exaggeration of allegations of security violations for individuals leading to indefinite clearance investigations or revocations. Manufactured claims of misconduct for poor performance, to justify termination of employment. Black marks placed in security files preventing future employment. Reassignment, isolation, marginalization, or hostile work environments. Administrative leave, placing individuals on administrative leave, with or without pay. "For contractors, sudden quote 'changes' to government requirements that simply eliminate their position and their job. And if an individual must take another job during an appeals process, simply to survive, financially, because it takes months and months and months to grind through these appeals processes, simply to survive, financially, they may be forced to take another job. Well, if you take another job, you lose standing to pursue your case, typically "Whistleblowers can face financial ruin, as you can see, especially as legal expenses accumulate. Congress must address this fundamental problem and incentivize potential whistleblowers to come forward by establishing a rapid, assured mechanism to compensate them for lost wages and expenses." (This must happen ASAP. If they know they're going to be taken care of, financially, no matter what, it should encourage more whistleblowers to come forward.) McConnell: "Some may ask, understandably, why UAP whistleblowers deserve special consideration over other whistleblowers? The answer to me is straightforward: The stakes are extremely high when it comes to this topic, few would dispute that the discovery of non-human intelligence visiting Earth would be an event of profound significance. The executive branch appears determined to keep this information secret at the highest levels, making this a major policy decision. One that could place officials assigned to protect whistleblowers, such as Inspectors General, in direct conflict with senior policymakers." (Sharing details of what could be the most important story in the history of humanity definitely deserves special consideration.) McConnell: "These factors distinguish UAP-related disclosures from typical cases of fraud, waste and abuse. Congress may need to take a more active role, even than I've suggested so far, in protecting these individuals. Potentially, by creating and administering a dedicated restitution fund, and modifying current law to allow whistleblowers to go directly to Congress without first filing a complaint with an Inspector General." (These are great ideas that need to happen NOW!) elsewhere Thank you, Kirk. It's a complex issue. People just go, 'Well, why don't they just come forward? It's so easy.' It's actually not. So, just trying to create an environment to enable people that do want to come forward, firsthand, metal benders, people that are working in the labs. And I think it's important for not just the public to understand, but making the plea to members of Congress."

Joe Murgia

18,668 次观看 • 8 个月前

Trump promised disclosure, the whistleblowers and insiders say that this is inevitable. But is the public ready for full disclosure of interdimensional beings that can be in the same room with you, read your mind, emotions and know your secrets without you even knowing that they are present? The UAP phenomenon is ancient and connected to religions and there are times when they emerge and disclosure becomes reality. It's always connected when there is great distress and close to the Geophysical Event.

Trump promised disclosure, the whistleblowers and insiders say that this is inevitable. But is the public ready for full disclosure of interdimensional beings that can be in the same room with you, read your mind, emotions and know your secrets without you even knowing that they are present? The UAP phenomenon is ancient and connected to religions and there are times when they emerge and disclosure becomes reality. It's always connected when there is great distress and close to the Geophysical Event.

Open Minded Approach

1,249,844 次观看 • 4 个月前

Tell Congress: Pass the UAP Disclosure Act For more than 75 years, the U.S. government has concealed information about Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), keeping Congress, scientists, and the public in the dark. But that era of secrecy can end—if Congress passes the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA). Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) will soon reintroduce the UAPDA. Now is the time to demand transparency, accountability, oversight, and answers. The UAPDA will launch a government-wide review and declassification effort, empowering Congress and the public to finally understand what has been hidden for decades. Take Action Now!

Tell Congress: Pass the UAP Disclosure Act For more than 75 years, the U.S. government has concealed information about Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), keeping Congress, scientists, and the public in the dark. But that era of secrecy can end—if Congress passes the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA). Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) will soon reintroduce the UAPDA. Now is the time to demand transparency, accountability, oversight, and answers. The UAPDA will launch a government-wide review and declassification effort, empowering Congress and the public to finally understand what has been hidden for decades. Take Action Now!

NewParadigmInstitute

44,345 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Rep. Anna Paulina Luna told Glenn Beck that a new UAP announcement is coming soon and will help confirm “the phenomenon is real.” She referenced an additional undisclosed factor tied to the issue that the public should know. Luna suggested the upcoming disclosure would provide further reassurance beyond current information. The comments came during a wide-ranging interview on Beck’s program. Her remarks add to growing expectations of major UAP developments from Congress in the near term. Original source credit: Anna Paulina Luna interview with Glenn Beck

🚨 Rep. Anna Paulina Luna told Glenn Beck that a new UAP announcement is coming soon and will help confirm “the phenomenon is real.” She referenced an additional undisclosed factor tied to the issue that the public should know. Luna suggested the upcoming disclosure would provide further reassurance beyond current information. The comments came during a wide-ranging interview on Beck’s program. Her remarks add to growing expectations of major UAP developments from Congress in the near term. Original source credit: Anna Paulina Luna interview with Glenn Beck

T R U T H P O L E

17,910 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jonathan Caplan, author of Not For Disclosure: "There's no question about it. The evidence is real [that UAP and NHI are real]. It's very extensive and it demonstrates a very clear phenomenon. The debate now is no longer whether this is a real phenomenon or not. In Washington, it's an open secret that it is. The debate now is trying to force disclosure." If you followed my posts as I read Not For Disclosure, you'll know that in my opinion, it is one of the most well researched and insightful books on the UFO topic. With that said, Caplan is VERY well connected. So when he speaks de facto statements, they don't come from supposition. Not for Disclosure is not an option anymore...

Jonathan Caplan, author of Not For Disclosure: "There's no question about it. The evidence is real [that UAP and NHI are real]. It's very extensive and it demonstrates a very clear phenomenon. The debate now is no longer whether this is a real phenomenon or not. In Washington, it's an open secret that it is. The debate now is trying to force disclosure." If you followed my posts as I read Not For Disclosure, you'll know that in my opinion, it is one of the most well researched and insightful books on the UFO topic. With that said, Caplan is VERY well connected. So when he speaks de facto statements, they don't come from supposition. Not for Disclosure is not an option anymore...

UAP Juan

10,612 次观看 • 18 天前

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna tells Fox News that Congress is being denied access to UFO footage “Why can’t we see some of these classified videos and information that seem to be operating under a black Congressional budget?” “Congress [is] not being given access to money that we’re spending.”

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna tells Fox News that Congress is being denied access to UFO footage “Why can’t we see some of these classified videos and information that seem to be operating under a black Congressional budget?” “Congress [is] not being given access to money that we’re spending.”

UAP James

73,737 次观看 • 10 个月前

I'll be introducing legislation not only to see that Adam Schiff is removed from the Intel Committee but to express the Sense of Congress that he should have no access to classified information at all. I'd rather give Former Rep. George Santos access to classified information than Schiff!

I'll be introducing legislation not only to see that Adam Schiff is removed from the Intel Committee but to express the Sense of Congress that he should have no access to classified information at all. I'd rather give Former Rep. George Santos access to classified information than Schiff!

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

352,201 次观看 • 3 年前

The Trump administration is developing a waiver program for UFO whistleblowers to share classified information, but investigative journalist Ross Coulthart tells “Katie Pavlich Tonight” that President Trump should grant broad immunity to insiders so they can disclose what they know to the public. More:

The Trump administration is developing a waiver program for UFO whistleblowers to share classified information, but investigative journalist Ross Coulthart tells “Katie Pavlich Tonight” that President Trump should grant broad immunity to insiders so they can disclose what they know to the public. More:

NewsNation

17,849 次观看 • 1 个月前

"Information is classified based on how severe the damage would be if it were released," said Shane Harris. "So, by saying the information is not classified, ... what these officials would have you believe is that all of this could be made public and there'd be no consequence."

"Information is classified based on how severe the damage would be if it were released," said Shane Harris. "So, by saying the information is not classified, ... what these officials would have you believe is that all of this could be made public and there'd be no consequence."

Washington Week with The Atlantic | PBS

11,783 次观看 • 1 年前

Member of the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) says “there are going to be continued briefings” on next steps for the conflict with Iran. “The chairman of the Armed Services Committee has chastised the [Defense] Department on needing to provide Congress with more information, but we've had classified briefings,” he says. “But the issue that is the crux of this, that Iran cannot be permitted to have a nuclear weapon.”

Member of the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) says “there are going to be continued briefings” on next steps for the conflict with Iran. “The chairman of the Armed Services Committee has chastised the [Defense] Department on needing to provide Congress with more information, but we've had classified briefings,” he says. “But the issue that is the crux of this, that Iran cannot be permitted to have a nuclear weapon.”

Face The Nation

13,375 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨Meagan: Rep. Eric Burlison Hints at Possible UAP Address as Disclosure Debate Intensifies Representative Eric Burlison has once again put himself into the center of the UAP disclosure conversation, fueling speculation that a major statement on the UFO issue could be on the horizon, according to Meagan. Burlison has suggested that a speech addressing the topic may be coming, with some sources pointing to a potential July 8 timeline. #UAP #UFO #Disclosure #EricBurlison #Congress #UAPDisclosure #Transparency Source:

🚨Meagan: Rep. Eric Burlison Hints at Possible UAP Address as Disclosure Debate Intensifies Representative Eric Burlison has once again put himself into the center of the UAP disclosure conversation, fueling speculation that a major statement on the UFO issue could be on the horizon, according to Meagan. Burlison has suggested that a speech addressing the topic may be coming, with some sources pointing to a potential July 8 timeline. #UAP #UFO #Disclosure #EricBurlison #Congress #UAPDisclosure #Transparency Source:

Skywatch Signal

20,963 次观看 • 7 个月前

I don't think people realize how massive President Trumps declassification of the UFO / UAP information is. If it's what's suspected, it will change the world and humanity as we know it forever. Listen to Rep. Anna Paulina Luna who leads the Congressional UAP task force on Joe Rogan's podcast from a few months ago. Not only is there strong evidence of "inter dimensional beings" but has significant religious and historical context. "Well, they call them interdimensional beings. I think that they can actually operate through the time spaces that we currently have" "I think that there's this historical aspect of, you know, this gets into the deeper theories and concepts of religion. And I think the history that we currently know, and that kind of spins off into another topic of, you know, you have the modern day Bible, you have this aspect of books of the Bible that have been removed that explain and kind of touch on these topics" Whether you believe in aliens or not. What is clear is that our Government knows something about our universe that we don't. Whether it's technology or aliens there is something there. They might not know what it is either. One thing is for certain, this information belongs to all of humanity not hidden from a government. Hidden know more thanks to President Trump.

I don't think people realize how massive President Trumps declassification of the UFO / UAP information is. If it's what's suspected, it will change the world and humanity as we know it forever. Listen to Rep. Anna Paulina Luna who leads the Congressional UAP task force on Joe Rogan's podcast from a few months ago. Not only is there strong evidence of "inter dimensional beings" but has significant religious and historical context. "Well, they call them interdimensional beings. I think that they can actually operate through the time spaces that we currently have" "I think that there's this historical aspect of, you know, this gets into the deeper theories and concepts of religion. And I think the history that we currently know, and that kind of spins off into another topic of, you know, you have the modern day Bible, you have this aspect of books of the Bible that have been removed that explain and kind of touch on these topics" Whether you believe in aliens or not. What is clear is that our Government knows something about our universe that we don't. Whether it's technology or aliens there is something there. They might not know what it is either. One thing is for certain, this information belongs to all of humanity not hidden from a government. Hidden know more thanks to President Trump.

J

35,745 次观看 • 7 个月前

Reporter: If The Atlantic's reporting is actually defamation, as Kash Patel claims, that would mean that Patel can prove it is all false and was printed with malice. But if that's true, then it cannot also be true that a criminal leak investigation is necessary, the kind normally reserved for the disclosure of real information. Those two are in legal contradiction.

Reporter: If The Atlantic's reporting is actually defamation, as Kash Patel claims, that would mean that Patel can prove it is all false and was printed with malice. But if that's true, then it cannot also be true that a criminal leak investigation is necessary, the kind normally reserved for the disclosure of real information. Those two are in legal contradiction.

FactPost

598,251 次观看 • 4 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress Leader Pawan Khera says, "Our 24 Akbar Road office and Youth Congress office have received a notice. What is the priority of the entire country today? The priority of the country is that there is no need to get stuck in the LPG lines, no need to buy in black, no need to feel the price of petrol and diesel, no need to feel the cost. Our farmers of garam masala, bananas, grapes, turmeric, the condition of Basmati rice, everything is stuck right now. This is the priority of the country... But the priority of the government is in front of you today. Government has priortised to focus on all these issues, to manage the headlines of the country, to keep them busy, to shut the mouth of the opposition so that they cannot raise these issues, so that they cannot ask questions, so that they cannot do press-conference, so that they cannot protest like our Youth Congress did. No matter how much you try, you will not be able to shut the mouth of the Congress..."

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress Leader Pawan Khera says, "Our 24 Akbar Road office and Youth Congress office have received a notice. What is the priority of the entire country today? The priority of the country is that there is no need to get stuck in the LPG lines, no need to buy in black, no need to feel the price of petrol and diesel, no need to feel the cost. Our farmers of garam masala, bananas, grapes, turmeric, the condition of Basmati rice, everything is stuck right now. This is the priority of the country... But the priority of the government is in front of you today. Government has priortised to focus on all these issues, to manage the headlines of the country, to keep them busy, to shut the mouth of the opposition so that they cannot raise these issues, so that they cannot ask questions, so that they cannot do press-conference, so that they cannot protest like our Youth Congress did. No matter how much you try, you will not be able to shut the mouth of the Congress..."

ANI

49,569 次观看 • 6 个月前

#WATCH | Guwahati: On CM HB Sarma's statement, Assam Congress MLA Abdur Rahim Ahmed says, "...This is a completely political issue. He (CM Sarma) is raising all these questions to divert people's attention from the main issues of Assam. This is an issue of national security, there is the Home Department of the Central Government, there is the IB. This is a matter of 2015. So what was the government doing all this time? If the state government had the information, it should have given it to the central government. I think our Chief Minister has completely failed in running the government. He has failed on every issue, he has also failed on the issue of development. There is so much unemployment, people are very angry and they have come to know that they cannot form the government in 2026..."

#WATCH | Guwahati: On CM HB Sarma's statement, Assam Congress MLA Abdur Rahim Ahmed says, "...This is a completely political issue. He (CM Sarma) is raising all these questions to divert people's attention from the main issues of Assam. This is an issue of national security, there is the Home Department of the Central Government, there is the IB. This is a matter of 2015. So what was the government doing all this time? If the state government had the information, it should have given it to the central government. I think our Chief Minister has completely failed in running the government. He has failed on every issue, he has also failed on the issue of development. There is so much unemployment, people are very angry and they have come to know that they cannot form the government in 2026..."

ANI

13,423 次观看 • 1 年前

“[David Grusch] is saying that he has seen, with his own eyes, video and photographic highly classified evidence of crash retrievals involving the craft and the occupants of non-human origin.” Filmmaker and UAP investigative journalist James Fox pushes for protections for UAP whistleblowers which would finally provide disclosure to the American people as more whistleblowers come forward with their testimony. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on OAN Live Today!

“[David Grusch] is saying that he has seen, with his own eyes, video and photographic highly classified evidence of crash retrievals involving the craft and the occupants of non-human origin.” Filmmaker and UAP investigative journalist James Fox pushes for protections for UAP whistleblowers which would finally provide disclosure to the American people as more whistleblowers come forward with their testimony. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on OAN Live Today!

One America News

120,112 次观看 • 18 天前

🚨 Dylan Borland is the DEAD MAN Switch and could bring catastrophic UFO disclosure 🛸 Sol Foundation Conference in Italy: Congressional UAP whistleblower Jeff Nuccetelli just revealed the TRUTH about fellow whistleblower Dylan Borland... “Dylan was what you call the dead man’s switch. He volunteered that if the situation got to the point where they felt their lives were in danger, that Dylan would be the one to come forward and disclose. And this would be the equivalent of catastrophic disclosure from these unknown whistleblowers. So Dylan did that.” Multiple high-level UFO whistleblowers trusted Dylan Borland with their lives — literally. If they were silenced, HE was the backup plan to drop everything. These are the same guys who testified to Congress about non-human craft, retaliation, and government cover-ups. Lives on the line for the truth. Dylan Borland is a national hero 🫡 Is this the beginning of the end for the biggest secret in history? 👽🔥 #UFO #UAP #Disclosure #UFOTwitter #Aliens

🚨 Dylan Borland is the DEAD MAN Switch and could bring catastrophic UFO disclosure 🛸 Sol Foundation Conference in Italy: Congressional UAP whistleblower Jeff Nuccetelli just revealed the TRUTH about fellow whistleblower Dylan Borland... “Dylan was what you call the dead man’s switch. He volunteered that if the situation got to the point where they felt their lives were in danger, that Dylan would be the one to come forward and disclose. And this would be the equivalent of catastrophic disclosure from these unknown whistleblowers. So Dylan did that.” Multiple high-level UFO whistleblowers trusted Dylan Borland with their lives — literally. If they were silenced, HE was the backup plan to drop everything. These are the same guys who testified to Congress about non-human craft, retaliation, and government cover-ups. Lives on the line for the truth. Dylan Borland is a national hero 🫡 Is this the beginning of the end for the biggest secret in history? 👽🔥 #UFO #UAP #Disclosure #UFOTwitter #Aliens

Interstellar

63,246 次观看 • 9 个月前