15 of the most basic reasons flat earthers exist

theres only 1 reason flat earthers exist - they never got past basic math and instead were shown things they can't understand and refuse any logical way to explain them because they exist - if it exists it must be a hoax

Excellent, more fallacious horse shit. When you have no response, you can only be fallacious.... 1) hasty generalization fallacy by claiming all flat earthers exist due to a single reason—failing basic math—without evidence to support this blanket statement. 2) ad hominem fallacy by attacking flat earthers’ intelligence (“never got past basic math”) rather than addressing their arguments directly. 3) strawman fallacy by misrepresenting flat earthers’ position as solely rejecting logical explanations because “if it exists it must be a hoax.” 4) false cause fallacy by assuming that a lack of math skills directly causes belief in a flat earth, without proving this causal link. One day, some Glober may be able to actually respond

The only reason is because they lack scientific understanding, or in your case, lack the mental capacity to process the scientific explanation, as I've witnessed you being told the explanation first hand by Professor Phil Bell. Hubris, arrogance and ignorance.

Is it impossible for you to comment absent fallacious reasoning? Lets count em for the benefit of the curious reader. 1) Ad hom: The phrase "lack the mental capacity to process the scientific explanation" attacks my perceived intelligence rather than addressing my argument at all 2) False Dilemma (False Dichotomy): The claim "The only reason is because they lack scientific understanding, or in your case, lack the mental capacity..." presents a restrictive either/or scenario, ignoring other potential explanations 3) Appeal to (False) Authority: Referencing "Professor Phil Bell" as an authority figure assumes his explanation is inherently correct without establishing his expertise in the relevant field. (retard reasoning). 4) Hasty Generalization The statement generalizes my understanding based on a single interaction ("as I've witnessed you being told..."). This hasty generalization draws a broad conclusion from insufficient evidence 5) Begging the Question The conclusion ("they lack scientific understanding") assumes the premise (their argument is invalid) without proof. This circular reasoning, or begging the question. One day, I hope a glober will be able to respond to anything I say without being logically fallacious, but I have yet to see it.

Cue the nonsensical excuses. 😂😂

Cue the multitude of fallacious responses * 😅

it's telling that so much flat earth content these days is AI generated slop

Just want you to know, I appreciate your high-quality curated content. (Don't tell them how a watch is built if they ask the time.). You're getting better at this. Cheers! ~BT

The first reason is false, no need to look at the others.

So much incoherences in this video..