Shane St Pierre
@AntiDisinfo86 • 12,200 subscribers
https://t.co/eQwUtIaQHO https://t.co/7m2w23JluM
Shorts
Videos
But you dont even have a model Flerf! Ah but yes we do! An observer-based sky model. No globe constants, no radius — just angles, timing, and position. Two layers: what you see, and where it's sourced. Pure ratios. Pure kinematics. Decide for yourself which framing is real
Shane St Pierre231,319 views • 1 month ago
No one can watch this and STILL THINK we went to the moon. NO ONE. The people who want to maintain their beliefs will NEVER watch this. All-in-one moon landing debunk doc: American Moon (English Version) Timestamps & Chapters 3:19 - 3:50 NASA Simulator 20:58 - 21:21 NASA Simulator 21:24 - 24:47 - 10 Years of Propaganda 24:48 - The Moon hoax Theory 59:58 - 1:14:55 Van Allen Radiation Belt - Ralph Rene 46:29 - 50:28 - How They Faked It 52: 51 - 56:44 - Moon Simulator 1:17:38 - 1:20:49 Engine Dust Imprint 1:20:39 - 1:23:05 Dust Foot Pads 1:26:59 - 1:30:29 Engine Noise 1:30:36 - 1:25:36 LEM Schematics & Lost Tapes 1:35:50 - 1:40:31 Radio Delay 1:40:32 - 1:46:38 Rover TV Broadcast 1:46:38 - 1:56:16 Lunar Dust and Footprints 1:56:16 - 2:04:20 Steel Wires 2:04:29 - 2:16:41 Air on the Moon 2:16:42 - 2:31:03 Photography & No Radiation Damage 2:31:05 - 2:36:03 Photography - Thermal Contraction 2:36:03 - 2:37:26 Photography - Brittle 2:37:27 -2:49:10 Photography - Artificial Light vs Sunlight 2:49:10 - 2:57:29 Photography - Shadows 2:57:20 - 3:00:25 Photography - Soft Edges 3:00:27 - 3:21:55 Photography - Backlight 3:22:03 - 3:23:19 Photography - Reshoot 3:23:19 - 3:00:00 Conclusion - Astronots Interviews
Shane St Pierre407,784 views • 1 year ago
Challenger Astronauts Alive? We Demand New Investigation!
Shane St Pierre80,515 views • 11 months ago
1:05
Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
In the words of your own experts "There is NO experiment to prove that the earth is in motion." You just choose to BELIEVE IT, as a direct result of the Copernican principle. 📍 Cool, but difficult thought process. Right? I mean, that's, that's essentially what's happening when you're on a plane. I mean, if you're throwing a ball up in the air and catching it on the plane, it's happening at a much smaller scale, right? Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you're flying at whatever, 600 miles an hour relative to the ground. Yeah. But it doesn't seem, but seem like it when you're sitting there. Yeah. And Einstein elevated that to a principle and said, if you're moving at, if you're not accelerating, you're just moving at a constant speed in a plane or now. I mean, that's essentially what we're doing now. We're. Moving around the sun effectively, constant speed, then you can't tell. So there's no experiment you can do. We could look at the decay of a radioactive nuclear, so some electricity and magnetism, or bounce a ball, have a pendulum, whatever it is, and there's no experiment you can do to tell you whether you're moving or not. Therefore, that concept has no meaning because you can't measure it. And that that's led Einstein to relativity. I'm gonna really drive this home for the last three minutes. Einstein, Hubble Hawking, Arthur Edington, you name 'em. You name 'em, Wolfgang Polly. They all explain. You can't prove that the earth is moving from the Earth. You cannot including stellar aberration. And they will tell you point blank that they can create a model for you that explains alleged parallax, which doesn't actually happen. Retrograde motion. Stellar aberration, all in a geocentric model with the earth stationary, and you cannot prove that it's spinning or revolving on the, the earth itself. It's impossible. Stephen Hawking in 2007 explained it quoting Einstein from his writings in special and general theory, relativity his paper on the combined two theories explaining that you cannot prove that the Earth is spinning. They choose to believe in the Copernican principle because they have a religion that triggers people because they, they think they hate religion. They, they hate God oftentimes. But that is a religion. It's a belief system built upon the doctrine of men void, of empirical, verifiable evidence, and in fact, contrary and antithetical to the actual evidence, despite what the evidence says. I just now read him point blank, say, it can never be disproven. We disregard that possibility because of the horror of a special and unique position. Right, and I have plenty of quotes here from Georis or Heliocentric explaining. You can never prove it. You can't prove that the Earth is STA or that the earth is not stationary. But we don't want to believe that because that would mean the Earth is special. So then what do we do? We go look out at the background distribution, the energy coming away from the earth that shows the Earth's in the center. So what do they do? They call it the axis of evil. Then they come up with a new idea. Well, oh, it does look like we're the center. But that must mean that no matter where you are in the universe, it would look like you're in the center or we're just in the center. That they don't want to say what it is because it has spiritual implications. It has philosophical ramifications. And that is that the earth had to be placed there. It has a special, unique position. They want you, they want to believe that there are a time spec of dust and ever expanding universe of nothingness for everything came from nothing and there's a preexisting energy. Let's not talk about that part. Oh, lightning struck al soup and all this nonsense and And you know why? That's a good question. Probably 'cause they're scared. Scared of like moral accountability, I would guess. But this is the point. This is the problem. It is portrayed as science and we're brainwashing, indoctrinated with this idea as if it is science and it's proven and it's not questionable when you actually go look behind the curtain. It's philosophy and they admit it. So I, that's why I gave specific quotes and it was walked past us. The crux of the whole issue. There is a philosophy that leads to atheism and nihilism and materialism portrayed onto the world as if it is in fact scientific fact. You can't prove that the earth is moving. If the earth is the ball that spins with the objectively isn't. We falsified it. Everything gives us the illusion.
Shane St Pierre54,527 views • 1 year ago
Another test for curvature was conducted by someone in Canada … Can you guess the result?
Shane St Pierre24,648 views • 5 months ago
The shining example of earth curve …. That isn’t earth curve
Shane St Pierre24,180 views • 9 months ago
![Debunking flat earth [Rob Skiba]](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1941885866382696888/amplify_video_thumb/1941885417160065025/img/BSSrOg6we9ILTEe9.jpg)
Once again. 24 hour sun in the Antarctic on FE Psychedelicizationism's video! #TikTok
Shane St Pierre27,224 views • 1 year ago
Irrefutable proof that Earth is stationary Courtesy of Sir George Airy
Shane St Pierre18,915 views • 1 year ago
