Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

1908: Britain seized Iran’s oil. William D’Arcy purchased exclusive extraction rights from the Shah for 16% profit, with a clause that Iran would not audit the books. The company is BP, British Petroleum.

VictoriaSask's profile picture

MAGA FOREVER AMEN 🇨🇦 🇺🇸 🇬🇷

34,842 subscribers

15,581 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

1908: When Britain Seized Iran's Oil THE BOARD OF PEACE The Final Piece: How Trump Is Breaking the British-Centered Iran System Wow this is long, but well worth the time! What do you think?
8:39

1908: When Britain Seized Iran's Oil THE BOARD OF PEACE The Final Piece: How Trump Is Breaking the British-Centered Iran System Wow this is long, but well worth the time! What do you think?

✞🎀TrumpGirlOnFire 🔥

91,076 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The West called Iran a "democracy" when British companies were draining its oil wealth. The moment Iran took it back, it became a terrorist state. In reality, the revolution in Iran was about nationalizing its oil which means for the West that they won't profit. You probably heard about BP oil? Gas stations? Well, that was Anglo-Persian oil company that profited British oligarchs, not Iranian people. CIA and MI6 overthrew the government in 1953 but in 1979 Iran took its government back and became an evil country once again.
2:52

The West called Iran a "democracy" when British companies were draining its oil wealth. The moment Iran took it back, it became a terrorist state. In reality, the revolution in Iran was about nationalizing its oil which means for the West that they won't profit. You probably heard about BP oil? Gas stations? Well, that was Anglo-Persian oil company that profited British oligarchs, not Iranian people. CIA and MI6 overthrew the government in 1953 but in 1979 Iran took its government back and became an evil country once again.

Rina Lu🇷🇺

55,085 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Theo Von just suggested that Trump intervened in Iran and Venezuela for the Rothschilds. “A lot of people say it’s because these countries are outside of the Rothschild banking system.” “This is tinfoil stuff … ” And Joe Rogan asked AI for the “tinfoil hat version” of why the CIA covertly overthrew Iran’s government in 1953: “Iran tried to take back its oil, the British and Americans teamed up in secret to crush that idea.” “Britain had built its empire and navy on cheap Iranian oil via the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, later British Petroleum.” “So when Mosaddegh [nationalized Iran’s oil], London sought as a direct threat to its global power and profits.” “We’ve been monkeying around with other countries forever.” Joe Rogan Theo Von
2:53

Theo Von just suggested that Trump intervened in Iran and Venezuela for the Rothschilds. “A lot of people say it’s because these countries are outside of the Rothschild banking system.” “This is tinfoil stuff … ” And Joe Rogan asked AI for the “tinfoil hat version” of why the CIA covertly overthrew Iran’s government in 1953: “Iran tried to take back its oil, the British and Americans teamed up in secret to crush that idea.” “Britain had built its empire and navy on cheap Iranian oil via the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, later British Petroleum.” “So when Mosaddegh [nationalized Iran’s oil], London sought as a direct threat to its global power and profits.” “We’ve been monkeying around with other countries forever.” Joe Rogan Theo Von

Holden Culotta

607,594 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The Shah’s personal animosity toward the great powers started here. His father, Reza Shah, already deeply resented Britain for its constant interference in Iran’s internal affairs and the long history of foreign powers treating Iran as something they could divide into spheres of influence. After only 13 years in power, Reza Shah had built Iran’s first modern national army in centuries, independent of Western financing and control. Yet in 1941, that young army suddenly found itself facing two of the world’s greatest powers invading Iran simultaneously from the north and south. The Allies forced Reza Shah to abdicate. His son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, inherited the crown because any other route risked throwing Iran into chaos. The young Shah then faced the Soviet Union. The Soviets refused to fully withdraw from Iran and set up separatist governments in Iranian Azerbaijan and Mahabad. Iran restored its sovereignty over both. Then came Britain. The Shah inherited an oil industry that had been dominated by Britain since the Qajar era. After the oil crisis of the early 1950s, the 1954 Consortium Agreement replaced Britain’s near-monopoly with a consortium dominated by Western oil companies, including BP, Standard Oil, Texaco, Gulf, Socony and Shell, under a 50/50 profit-sharing arrangement with Iran. But that agreement was set to expire in 1979. And the Shah had no intention of renewing the old relationship. By the 1970s, this was a completely different Iran. The country Britain and Russia had once divided into spheres of influence had become the dominant military power in the Persian Gulf. Iran was moving toward full control over its own resources, backed by a military no foreign power could simply confront head-on as Britain and the Soviet Union had done in 1941. 1979 was supposed to mark the final chapter in that struggle for Iran’s economic sovereignty. Instead, it became the year of the Islamic Revolution. So for those western commentators spreading the “Western-installed puppet Shah” nonsense. The Shah spent his reign confronting Soviet territorial ambitions, breaking foreign control over Iranian oil and building a military specifically designed to ensure that Iran could never again be treated the way it was in 1941. If you want to talk about a leader whose rise was facilitated by the West, talk about Khomeini. The West abandoned the Shah, opened channels with Khomeini’s movement and convinced itself that Khomeini could become the Gandhi-like figure they hoped he would be and continue the 50-50 profit sharing agreement over oil. Unfortunately for the West, and catastrophically for Iran, Khomeini turned out to be something entirely different.
0:21

The Shah’s personal animosity toward the great powers started here. His father, Reza Shah, already deeply resented Britain for its constant interference in Iran’s internal affairs and the long history of foreign powers treating Iran as something they could divide into spheres of influence. After only 13 years in power, Reza Shah had built Iran’s first modern national army in centuries, independent of Western financing and control. Yet in 1941, that young army suddenly found itself facing two of the world’s greatest powers invading Iran simultaneously from the north and south. The Allies forced Reza Shah to abdicate. His son, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, inherited the crown because any other route risked throwing Iran into chaos. The young Shah then faced the Soviet Union. The Soviets refused to fully withdraw from Iran and set up separatist governments in Iranian Azerbaijan and Mahabad. Iran restored its sovereignty over both. Then came Britain. The Shah inherited an oil industry that had been dominated by Britain since the Qajar era. After the oil crisis of the early 1950s, the 1954 Consortium Agreement replaced Britain’s near-monopoly with a consortium dominated by Western oil companies, including BP, Standard Oil, Texaco, Gulf, Socony and Shell, under a 50/50 profit-sharing arrangement with Iran. But that agreement was set to expire in 1979. And the Shah had no intention of renewing the old relationship. By the 1970s, this was a completely different Iran. The country Britain and Russia had once divided into spheres of influence had become the dominant military power in the Persian Gulf. Iran was moving toward full control over its own resources, backed by a military no foreign power could simply confront head-on as Britain and the Soviet Union had done in 1941. 1979 was supposed to mark the final chapter in that struggle for Iran’s economic sovereignty. Instead, it became the year of the Islamic Revolution. So for those western commentators spreading the “Western-installed puppet Shah” nonsense. The Shah spent his reign confronting Soviet territorial ambitions, breaking foreign control over Iranian oil and building a military specifically designed to ensure that Iran could never again be treated the way it was in 1941. If you want to talk about a leader whose rise was facilitated by the West, talk about Khomeini. The West abandoned the Shah, opened channels with Khomeini’s movement and convinced itself that Khomeini could become the Gandhi-like figure they hoped he would be and continue the 50-50 profit sharing agreement over oil. Unfortunately for the West, and catastrophically for Iran, Khomeini turned out to be something entirely different.

Arsalan Naamdar

19,378 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A VERY BRITISH COUP Britain occupied Iran to steal its oil And when the people elected Prime Minister Mossadegh, who nationalised the oil, organised a coup and overthrew him, executing his foreign minister Follow #MOATS 537 #georgegalloway #Iran #BP #MohammadMossadegh
1:04

A VERY BRITISH COUP Britain occupied Iran to steal its oil And when the people elected Prime Minister Mossadegh, who nationalised the oil, organised a coup and overthrew him, executing his foreign minister Follow #MOATS 537 #georgegalloway #Iran #BP #MohammadMossadegh

George Galloway

29,043 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Villagers in Kenya are suing British Petroleum, saying oil exploration by Amoco in the 1980s left toxic pollution that harmed hundreds of people. BP declined a request for an interview and has not responded to the accusations. It attended the session virtually.
2:52

Villagers in Kenya are suing British Petroleum, saying oil exploration by Amoco in the 1980s left toxic pollution that harmed hundreds of people. BP declined a request for an interview and has not responded to the accusations. It attended the session virtually.

Al Jazeera English

26,197 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Reid: Why did the Iran hostage crisis take place? Todd: Because fundamentalist radicals took over the government Reid: They overthrew the shah who we imposed on Iran because the Dulles brothers, one at the CIA and one at the state department, decided that the oil beneath the soil of Iran belonged to BP and belonged to us. And when mossadegh, who was the leader of Iran, the democratically elected leader of Iran, said that we would like to audit BP because we want to know if you are cheating us or paying the people of Iran based on the oil under their soil. And they said, you may not audit us. And then we overthrew him and he wound up dying in prison because we decided in our arrogance as a country, got to own their oil.
2:06

Reid: Why did the Iran hostage crisis take place? Todd: Because fundamentalist radicals took over the government Reid: They overthrew the shah who we imposed on Iran because the Dulles brothers, one at the CIA and one at the state department, decided that the oil beneath the soil of Iran belonged to BP and belonged to us. And when mossadegh, who was the leader of Iran, the democratically elected leader of Iran, said that we would like to audit BP because we want to know if you are cheating us or paying the people of Iran based on the oil under their soil. And they said, you may not audit us. And then we overthrew him and he wound up dying in prison because we decided in our arrogance as a country, got to own their oil.

Acyn

3,052,600 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz: The entire dilemma in Iran came about because the British and the American governments overthrew the democratic government of Iran and replaced it with the dictator, the Shah, who was later overthrown in turn by today’s rulers, who then established a brutal dictatorship — unlike what many people had hoped for at the time. Had it not been for the overthrow of Iran’s democratic government at the beginning, carried out for oil interests, Iran would today be a very successful Western country
0:34

Former German Chancellor Olaf Scholz: The entire dilemma in Iran came about because the British and the American governments overthrew the democratic government of Iran and replaced it with the dictator, the Shah, who was later overthrown in turn by today’s rulers, who then established a brutal dictatorship — unlike what many people had hoped for at the time. Had it not been for the overthrow of Iran’s democratic government at the beginning, carried out for oil interests, Iran would today be a very successful Western country

Clash Report

460,909 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Britain for the British What is wrong with that?
0:28

Britain for the British What is wrong with that?

Basil the Great

12,516 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

New report from BP oil shows their profits have a doubled since the Iran war started BP posted $3.2 billion in underlying replacement cost profit, more than doubled from $1.38 billion in Q1 2025 “BP has come under fire after revealing that its profits more than doubled in the first three months of the year. Thanks to the soaring cost of crude oil caused by the Iran war” This is directly correlated with both gas prices and energy prices in homes Oil companies are posting record breaking profits while everyone else is getting destroyed by the cost of living
0:27

New report from BP oil shows their profits have a doubled since the Iran war started BP posted $3.2 billion in underlying replacement cost profit, more than doubled from $1.38 billion in Q1 2025 “BP has come under fire after revealing that its profits more than doubled in the first three months of the year. Thanks to the soaring cost of crude oil caused by the Iran war” This is directly correlated with both gas prices and energy prices in homes Oil companies are posting record breaking profits while everyone else is getting destroyed by the cost of living

Wall Street Apes

22,099 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

For the first time, Great Britain 🇬🇧 seized a Russian ship: a video of the night operation by British forces from the tanker "Smyrtos".
3:42

For the first time, Great Britain 🇬🇧 seized a Russian ship: a video of the night operation by British forces from the tanker "Smyrtos".

Shaun Pinner

11,499 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

When will Somalis learn? This is a BBC Documentary on how Hassan Sheikh Mahamud signed over Somalia's offshore oil rights to a 3 month old British fake shell company The company was owned by corrupt British government officials This is from 2014, but you would think it is 2025
2:20

When will Somalis learn? This is a BBC Documentary on how Hassan Sheikh Mahamud signed over Somalia's offshore oil rights to a 3 month old British fake shell company The company was owned by corrupt British government officials This is from 2014, but you would think it is 2025

🇸🇴

33,576 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

BP expects its oil trading result to be slightly higher in the second quarter after an exceptionally strong first quarter, as it continues to profit from a surge in oil prices caused by the Iran war
1:20

BP expects its oil trading result to be slightly higher in the second quarter after an exceptionally strong first quarter, as it continues to profit from a surge in oil prices caused by the Iran war

Reuters

44,421 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said that Britain would not "outsource" its foreign policy, responding to criticism from US President Trump over the UK’s handling of the US-Israel war on Iran.
0:31

British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said that Britain would not "outsource" its foreign policy, responding to criticism from US President Trump over the UK’s handling of the US-Israel war on Iran.

Al Jazeera English

40,074 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Johnny Harris, Johnny Harris I'm getting absolutely sick and tired of your factually incorrect, recycled talking points that you repeat over and over to spread false narratives about Iran and the Shah. I've been watching your videos for many years. Every time, I hope that because you clearly spend a lot of time researching, you'll eventually realize where you've been wrong and correct those mistakes in future videos. Instead, the same false narratives keep getting repeated. If you didn't have such a large platform, I wouldn't even care. Your video starts off reasonably well when discussing Reza Shah, but once you move on to Mohammad Reza Shah, your historical accuracy completely falls apart. To start, you claim: "The British are taking Iran's oil, and the Shah is okay with it, because remember, the British installed the Shah." I don't know if you understand how a hereditary monarchy works, but the crown passes from father to son. When Britain and the Soviet Union invaded Iran in 1941, Reza Shah's newly built military had no realistic chance of resisting two global superpowers. He was forced to abdicate and was sent into exile. His son then succeeded him, exactly as he would have under the normal line of succession. There were discussions between Britain and the Soviets about restoring a Qajar prince instead. They ultimately abandoned that idea because the Qajars had little support in Iran, whereas the Pahlavis did. If Britain had bypassed the line of succession and placed a Qajar or another political figure on the throne, that would have been installing a ruler. That is not what happened. Then you claim that "the Iranian people didn't like the Shah, they liked Mohammad Mossadegh." Who forced Soviet troops out of Iran after World War II? The Shah. Who reasserted Iranian control over the Soviet-backed separatist governments in Azerbaijan and Mahabad? The Shah. Following those events, Mohammad Reza Shah enjoyed enormous popularity. Now let's talk about Mossadegh. Who was most enthusiastic about Mossadegh's rise? The Soviet-backed Tudeh Party. The Tudeh Party, financially and politically aligned with Moscow, strongly supported him. Mossadegh certainly gained popularity among parts of the Iranian public because of his campaign to nationalize Iran's oil. What many people didn't realize was that the original D'Arcy concession—the agreement that handed Britain a 60-year oil concession—was signed under the Qajar dynasty, the dynasty to which Mossadegh himself belonged. So yes, it was the Qajar state that granted Britain that concession. Reza Shah later renegotiated it into a more favorable agreement for Iran. Yet somehow people continue repeating the myth that it was the Pahlavis who "gave away Iran's oil." Of course the Shah did not want Britain controlling Iran's oil indefinitely. What constrained him was reality. Iran had just emerged from World War II. It lacked the military strength to openly confront Britain, and unlike Mossadegh, the Shah had no interest in relying on Soviet support to challenge British influence. He also understood something Mossadegh failed to appreciate until it was too late. Nationalizing oil is easy on paper. Extracting it, transporting it, insuring it, refining it, finding buyers, and exporting it are entirely different matters. Iran lacked that infrastructure. When Mossadegh nationalized the oil industry before Iran was capable of operating it independently, Britain organized an international boycott. Oil exports collapsed, government revenues dried up, and the country was pushed into a severe financial crisis because oil was Iran's primary source of national income. The Shah's strategy was different. He wanted to continue receiving oil revenues, use that income to industrialize and modernize Iran, build the expertise and infrastructure necessary for an independent oil industry, and nationalize from a position of strength rather than symbolism. You are free to disagree with that strategy. You are not free to rewrite history. If you want to actually learn about this part of Iranian history, read this article.
3:05

Johnny Harris, Johnny Harris I'm getting absolutely sick and tired of your factually incorrect, recycled talking points that you repeat over and over to spread false narratives about Iran and the Shah. I've been watching your videos for many years. Every time, I hope that because you clearly spend a lot of time researching, you'll eventually realize where you've been wrong and correct those mistakes in future videos. Instead, the same false narratives keep getting repeated. If you didn't have such a large platform, I wouldn't even care. Your video starts off reasonably well when discussing Reza Shah, but once you move on to Mohammad Reza Shah, your historical accuracy completely falls apart. To start, you claim: "The British are taking Iran's oil, and the Shah is okay with it, because remember, the British installed the Shah." I don't know if you understand how a hereditary monarchy works, but the crown passes from father to son. When Britain and the Soviet Union invaded Iran in 1941, Reza Shah's newly built military had no realistic chance of resisting two global superpowers. He was forced to abdicate and was sent into exile. His son then succeeded him, exactly as he would have under the normal line of succession. There were discussions between Britain and the Soviets about restoring a Qajar prince instead. They ultimately abandoned that idea because the Qajars had little support in Iran, whereas the Pahlavis did. If Britain had bypassed the line of succession and placed a Qajar or another political figure on the throne, that would have been installing a ruler. That is not what happened. Then you claim that "the Iranian people didn't like the Shah, they liked Mohammad Mossadegh." Who forced Soviet troops out of Iran after World War II? The Shah. Who reasserted Iranian control over the Soviet-backed separatist governments in Azerbaijan and Mahabad? The Shah. Following those events, Mohammad Reza Shah enjoyed enormous popularity. Now let's talk about Mossadegh. Who was most enthusiastic about Mossadegh's rise? The Soviet-backed Tudeh Party. The Tudeh Party, financially and politically aligned with Moscow, strongly supported him. Mossadegh certainly gained popularity among parts of the Iranian public because of his campaign to nationalize Iran's oil. What many people didn't realize was that the original D'Arcy concession—the agreement that handed Britain a 60-year oil concession—was signed under the Qajar dynasty, the dynasty to which Mossadegh himself belonged. So yes, it was the Qajar state that granted Britain that concession. Reza Shah later renegotiated it into a more favorable agreement for Iran. Yet somehow people continue repeating the myth that it was the Pahlavis who "gave away Iran's oil." Of course the Shah did not want Britain controlling Iran's oil indefinitely. What constrained him was reality. Iran had just emerged from World War II. It lacked the military strength to openly confront Britain, and unlike Mossadegh, the Shah had no interest in relying on Soviet support to challenge British influence. He also understood something Mossadegh failed to appreciate until it was too late. Nationalizing oil is easy on paper. Extracting it, transporting it, insuring it, refining it, finding buyers, and exporting it are entirely different matters. Iran lacked that infrastructure. When Mossadegh nationalized the oil industry before Iran was capable of operating it independently, Britain organized an international boycott. Oil exports collapsed, government revenues dried up, and the country was pushed into a severe financial crisis because oil was Iran's primary source of national income. The Shah's strategy was different. He wanted to continue receiving oil revenues, use that income to industrialize and modernize Iran, build the expertise and infrastructure necessary for an independent oil industry, and nationalize from a position of strength rather than symbolism. You are free to disagree with that strategy. You are not free to rewrite history. If you want to actually learn about this part of Iranian history, read this article.

Arsalan Naamdar

15,610 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇮🇷🇷🇺 "Iran is the largest foreign investor in Russia" Ambassador Kazem Jalali said that $1.1 billion had already been spent from the $8 billion contract with a Russian oil company in Iran
0:47

🇮🇷🇷🇺 "Iran is the largest foreign investor in Russia" Ambassador Kazem Jalali said that $1.1 billion had already been spent from the $8 billion contract with a Russian oil company in Iran

Lord Bebo

20,481 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨 THIS IS WHY IRAN IS SCREWED! The regime is on the brink of having to SHUT DOWN oil extraction if they try to play the waiting game on President Trump "Dropping oil extraction is going to cause not just DAMANGE to their oil extraction volume in the long run, but it's also going to lead to UNEMPLOYMENT rate increasing. It's the heart of Iran's economy." "It accounts for 70-80 percent of Iran's revenue that it uses to run the government operations!" "Probably around 13-16 days to store oil that they can't export. When they run out of storage, then they're gonna have to drop oil extraction." FAULKNER: "They're FEELING IT."
0:54

🚨 THIS IS WHY IRAN IS SCREWED! The regime is on the brink of having to SHUT DOWN oil extraction if they try to play the waiting game on President Trump "Dropping oil extraction is going to cause not just DAMANGE to their oil extraction volume in the long run, but it's also going to lead to UNEMPLOYMENT rate increasing. It's the heart of Iran's economy." "It accounts for 70-80 percent of Iran's revenue that it uses to run the government operations!" "Probably around 13-16 days to store oil that they can't export. When they run out of storage, then they're gonna have to drop oil extraction." FAULKNER: "They're FEELING IT."

Eric Daugherty

71,800 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

VIDEO COLUMN: The oil, the oil, and the oil. Like it or not, Venezuela's oil is now part of a petroleum empire stretching from Alaska to Patagonia — all under Washington’s tutelage. @Opinion #Venezuela
2:00

VIDEO COLUMN: The oil, the oil, and the oil. Like it or not, Venezuela's oil is now part of a petroleum empire stretching from Alaska to Patagonia — all under Washington’s tutelage. @Opinion #Venezuela

Javier Blas

50,190 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce