正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The Shah’s personal animosity toward the great powers started here. His father, Reza Shah, already deeply resented Britain for its constant interference in Iran’s internal affairs and the long history of foreign powers treating Iran as something they could divide into spheres of influence. After only 13 years in...

19,378 次观看 • 22 天前 •via X (Twitter)

12 条评论

Domidest🇩🇰 的头像
Domidest🇩🇰22 天前

Shah of Iran: "If I leave, Iran will go down, If Iran goes down, Middle East will go down, If Middle East goes down, the world will suffer."

PPablo 的头像
PPablo22 天前

This is correct. His Majesty stood ready for the Iranian people and their happiness and prosperity. Many lies were and are being spread. I honour the legacy of HIM Shah Reza Pahlavi. My deepest respect for HIM Empress Widow Farah and for Crown Prince Reza and the Imperial Family. May the Lord bless them.

Mitra_is_here 的头像
Mitra_is_here22 天前

Well said. The west betrayed the Shah and sponsored Khomeini’s coup, and continues to rescue the regime time and again against the will of the Iranian people. The Islamic republic is the bastard child of the western global elite, who consistently shows up to rescue them and give them her tit.

Ardawan 的头像
Ardawan22 天前

The shah was a martyr not khamenei(gods curse be upon him) it was truly stupid for Iranians to overthrow him for khomeini(incarnation of Satan) , even if he was a western puppet at least you were not dying for an arab cause that even arabs don't want to die for

Mino Abrishami 的头像
Mino Abrishami22 天前

@Sativa888 Long live king Reza Pahlavi #JavidShah #KingRezaPahlaviForIran

Azad Ghan 的头像
Azad Ghan22 天前

May we see the day Iran is free from the influence of foreign countries. Especially Russia and the United Kingdom.

Tina 的头像
Tina21 天前

Khomeini betrayed the West and founded an Islamic mafia network of #IRGCterrorists instead.

Mike 的头像
Mike22 天前

You moron the west literally installed the shah in 1953. Once he noticed the Zionist control he spoke up about it and a year or two later he was dead

Patriot 的头像
Patriot21 天前

Unfortunately the super powers succeeded. The Shah could have stopped their devious plan In 1977 by using his powerful military to protect the country and give an stern warning to those countries to stay out of Iran or else since Iran was the superpower of the Middle East.

pirlee 的头像
pirlee22 天前

Never show the blade until the cut is already decided

جی-زی 的头像
جی-زی21 天前

MAJESTADE

Kurasa 的头像
Kurasa17 天前

Britain was from the outset of the tragedy of 1979 a top backer / beneficiary of the Islamic dictatorship in Iran.

相关视频

Johnny Harris, Johnny Harris I'm getting absolutely sick and tired of your factually incorrect, recycled talking points that you repeat over and over to spread false narratives about Iran and the Shah. I've been watching your videos for many years. Every time, I hope that because you clearly spend a lot of time researching, you'll eventually realize where you've been wrong and correct those mistakes in future videos. Instead, the same false narratives keep getting repeated. If you didn't have such a large platform, I wouldn't even care. Your video starts off reasonably well when discussing Reza Shah, but once you move on to Mohammad Reza Shah, your historical accuracy completely falls apart. To start, you claim: "The British are taking Iran's oil, and the Shah is okay with it, because remember, the British installed the Shah." I don't know if you understand how a hereditary monarchy works, but the crown passes from father to son. When Britain and the Soviet Union invaded Iran in 1941, Reza Shah's newly built military had no realistic chance of resisting two global superpowers. He was forced to abdicate and was sent into exile. His son then succeeded him, exactly as he would have under the normal line of succession. There were discussions between Britain and the Soviets about restoring a Qajar prince instead. They ultimately abandoned that idea because the Qajars had little support in Iran, whereas the Pahlavis did. If Britain had bypassed the line of succession and placed a Qajar or another political figure on the throne, that would have been installing a ruler. That is not what happened. Then you claim that "the Iranian people didn't like the Shah, they liked Mohammad Mossadegh." Who forced Soviet troops out of Iran after World War II? The Shah. Who reasserted Iranian control over the Soviet-backed separatist governments in Azerbaijan and Mahabad? The Shah. Following those events, Mohammad Reza Shah enjoyed enormous popularity. Now let's talk about Mossadegh. Who was most enthusiastic about Mossadegh's rise? The Soviet-backed Tudeh Party. The Tudeh Party, financially and politically aligned with Moscow, strongly supported him. Mossadegh certainly gained popularity among parts of the Iranian public because of his campaign to nationalize Iran's oil. What many people didn't realize was that the original D'Arcy concession—the agreement that handed Britain a 60-year oil concession—was signed under the Qajar dynasty, the dynasty to which Mossadegh himself belonged. So yes, it was the Qajar state that granted Britain that concession. Reza Shah later renegotiated it into a more favorable agreement for Iran. Yet somehow people continue repeating the myth that it was the Pahlavis who "gave away Iran's oil." Of course the Shah did not want Britain controlling Iran's oil indefinitely. What constrained him was reality. Iran had just emerged from World War II. It lacked the military strength to openly confront Britain, and unlike Mossadegh, the Shah had no interest in relying on Soviet support to challenge British influence. He also understood something Mossadegh failed to appreciate until it was too late. Nationalizing oil is easy on paper. Extracting it, transporting it, insuring it, refining it, finding buyers, and exporting it are entirely different matters. Iran lacked that infrastructure. When Mossadegh nationalized the oil industry before Iran was capable of operating it independently, Britain organized an international boycott. Oil exports collapsed, government revenues dried up, and the country was pushed into a severe financial crisis because oil was Iran's primary source of national income. The Shah's strategy was different. He wanted to continue receiving oil revenues, use that income to industrialize and modernize Iran, build the expertise and infrastructure necessary for an independent oil industry, and nationalize from a position of strength rather than symbolism. You are free to disagree with that strategy. You are not free to rewrite history. If you want to actually learn about this part of Iranian history, read this article.

Arsalan Naamdar

15,610 次观看 • 2 个月前

IRAN WAS TURNED INTO A PROBLEM for the west by the west, a top CIA agent reveals in a stunning new documentary. Peter Sichel, former CIA station chief based in Hong Kong, gave an interview in a documentary, The Last Spy, before he died last year, aged 102. In the 1950s, Iranian Prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh wanted to nationalize the oil industry to share the profits with the people of Iran, Sichel said. So MI6 and the CIA overthrew him and installed the authoritarian Shah of Iran, M Reza Pahlavi, who promised to keep Iran’s oil money going to western oil corporations. But the whole thing was so brutally unfair that Iranians complained for decades, and eventually toppled Pahlavi in 1979. . REPEATING HISTORY Today, US President Donald Trump wants to get the US-serving Pahlavi faction reinstated, and Iran’s oil profits to be again controlled by the west. None of this was necessary. “If we had not got rid of Mossadegh, Iran today would be a good member of the family of nations,” Sichel says in the documentary. CIA historians acknowledge that the success of the US-UK operation against the Iranians in the 1950s prompted similar actions elsewhere—a long list of regime change operations. . DISLOYAL CIA AGENT When Sichel complained to his CIA bosses about the endless fearmongering about socialists and communists, he was painted as disloyal. The communist threat simply wasn't real. The MI6-CIA’s Iran coup model was used multiple times. In 1954, the US installed a military dictator in Guatemala, sparking a civil war that killed 245,000 people. Under the unwritten rules of western global dominance, the US, UK and Israel are never held accountable for crimes, however many innocent people die. And that’s why things have to change.

Nury Vittachi

31,140 次观看 • 4 个月前

🔴 BREAKING: Iranian Air Force officers have announced their defection from the Islamist regime in Iran, burning portraits of Khamenei and Khomeini and pledging allegiance to His Majesty, Iran’s King-in-Exile and National Leader, Reza Shah Pahlavi II [Reza Pahlavi], as well as to Iran’s monarchy and Iran's Lion and Sun flag. They have chanted #JavidShah, meaning “Long Live the Shah,” a popular and national slogan in Iran and a symbol of allegiance and loyalty to the Pahlavi Dynasty [the founders of modern Iran] and the Iranian monarchy. This marks another major development as mass defections continue to spread across Iran’s Armed Forces following His Majesty’s launch of the National Cooperation to Save Iran campaign [commonly known as the National Cooperation], an initiative designed to coordinate and organize mass defections from within the regime inside Iran. According to official reports, tens of thousands of Iranian military officers and other regime personnel have already reached out through secure communication channels established by His Majesty Reza Shah II [King Reza]. Just days ago, two ranking officers of the Iranian Army’s (Artesh) Air Defense publicly declared their defection, pledged allegiance to King Reza Pahlavi, and raised the Lion and Sun flag inside the Tehran Metro. Numerous others, including senior officers and commanders from various branches of Iran’s Armed Forces, have since released video messages doing the same. #KingRezaPahlavi Via Shayan News

Rayan Amiri

353,956 次观看 • 9 个月前