正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

$200 three position active reset safety that uses a mil spec trigger. Very similar to the SS except using a traditional safety switch instead of cross bolt design.

223,954 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Erzx 的头像
Erzx1 年前

These guys are located in California.

Golf Safety 的头像
Golf Safety2 年前

Plot twist: These safety plans actually SAVE you time! 👀 With our customized, comprehensive resources, it's never been easier to keep your course OSHA-compliant and your crew safe. Book a demo call with Golf Safety today and let's build a safer environment together!

Boner™ 的头像
Boner™1 年前

My two biggest questions are: what is it made of? And will whoever is selling it be storing any customer purchase information?

James Huffman 的头像
James Huffman1 年前

Is rare breed going to sue them?

John Antikainen 的头像
John Antikainen1 年前

When you put that rifle in 'full-semi', I'm pretty sure I got a full-semi, and made me feel kinda funny inside. 🥹

LogicShmogic 的头像
LogicShmogic1 年前

Where

Q Moe Dee 的头像
Q Moe Dee1 年前

GOD BLESS YOU AND GOD BLESS AMERICA

Caden 的头像
Caden1 年前

“Full Semi” is beautiful

Junbi OK 👍 的头像
Junbi OK 👍1 年前

500 bucks for this btw

Print Shoot Repeat 的头像
Print Shoot Repeat1 年前

Incorrect. $200. They’re announcing it this week.

blackopstoys 的头像
blackopstoys1 年前

Oh baby! Deserves a 👍 thumbs up.

相关视频

😱MASSIVE BREAK: The Fatal Flaw in the Tyler Robinson Case—Gun Could NOT Have Been Fired! 👀 The mainstream media is aggressively pushing the narrative that Tyler Robinson used a WWII-era .30-06 Mauser to assassinate Charlie Kirk. But if you actually understand firearm mechanics, there is a glaring, undeniable hole in their story. Take a close look at photos of the rifle the Feds are trying to sell to the public as the "murder weapon." BTW The phot release is NOT the actual gun recovered but a generic Remington 700 or a Mauser 125th-anniversary model with the background edited out). Anyway, regardless of that; the Mauser 98 allegedly used by Tyler Robinson features a $2k low-mounted scope. Here is the mechanical reality the FBI hopes you don't notice: 🛑 The Mauser Wing Safety: The original Mauser 98 action uses a tall, 3-position "wing" or "flag" safety on the back of the bolt. To take the rifle off "SAFE" and put it on "FIRE", that metal flag has to flip in a 180-degree arc directly over the top of the bolt. 🛑 The Scope Collision: Look at how low that optic is mounted. If this rifle still has its original military-style safety, you cannot physically push the safety to the "FIRE" position. The metal flag will instantly smash directly into the bottom of the scope's ocular bell. Let's be completely clear about the facts: This rifle could NOT have been fired unless it was equipped with an aftermarket modified safety (like a low-profile or side-swing safety). If the rifle in FBI custody retains the original military safety, it is literally an inoperable prop. The safety flag is physically blocked by the optic scope, meaning you cannot switch the safety off, and YOU CANNOT PULL THE TRIGGER. Is this why the FBI has locked the physical gun away at Quantico? Is this why they are flat-out refusing to let Tyler Robinson’s defense attorneys physically examine the weapon? If a defense expert gets their hands on it and confirms an unmodified safety, they will prove in open court that the state's murder weapon couldn't have fired the fatal shot. The state's case isn't just full of holes—it defies the basic laws of physics. 👇 Look at the diagrams. Understand the mechanics. SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE. The official narrative is collapsing. CREDIT: Sara Kirk 🩷 FOLLOW Her!

Project Constitution

182,395 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Engine Start Levers or Fuel Cut off switches (different name, same switches) control the fuel and ignition for the engines. The 787 shares the same switches and very similar logic to the Boeing 737 Max. The switches have been designed in such a way that they require a very deliberate movement in order for them to move from one position to another. They’re also placed in such a position (below the thrust levers) so that it’s very unlikely that they’ll be knocked. But even if they were, the spring force and detent would prevent them from moving unintentionally. When we move the start levers from the “Run” or “Idle” position, to “Cutoff”, an electrical signal is sent to move the fuel valves from open to close. The engine ignitors are also then de-powered. This stops the supply and ignition of fuel and the engine spools down. Pilots are trained from day one to only touch those switches in flight when called for by a non normal checklist, such as an engine fire or failure. When a fuel switch has to be moved to cutoff in flight, we adhere to a very strict procedure… Pilot monitoring will place their hand on the switch of the damaged engine and both visually and audibly confirm with Pilot flying that the correct fuel switch has been selected. Only after both pilots have confirmed that the correct switch has been selected, will pilot monitoring move that switch to the cutoff position. As an additional layer of safety, some aircraft types only allow the switch to be moved to cutoff in flight if the thrust levers are in the closed or idle position. Do you think that this design feature should be implemented in all aircraft? 📸 by ig/airlinepilotperformance

aircraftmaintenancengineer

149,946 次观看 • 1 年前