Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🐾2-y/o Chloe dumped b/c owner says: cannot handle smell or mess. Chloe needs a better owner. Housetrained, active, playful. Friendly w/ strangers, kids, dogs & cats; she has it all. Available to foster or adopt. Need offer by *6/01* *See her pics below*

15,100 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Today is a wonderful day at LAW! 😍 Berani has finally left the clinic and is joining her new family at our Celuk Buluh shelter 😁🥰 We'll keep her separate for a week or two to let her settle in and get used to her new surroundings, gradually introducing her to a couple of the other dogs. She's very friendly with humans, but very nervous around other dogs at the moment. The guy who alerted us to her has let us down very badly 😞 He said he would like to adopt her when she was better and would fundraise to help us pay for the veterinary care. Now he's changed his mind about adopting her and hasn't raised a penny 😢 We're determined Berani will have a good home with us and be well taken care of, regardless! ❤ We never put them back out on the streets to fend for themselves. In 2 weeks she'll be sterilised too. One of our goals is to try to get the numbers of unwanted puppies down, so every dog under our care goes through the procedure to battle those numbers. Veterinary care is very costly, even with charity status discount, it drains the funds drastically 😩 Please help us to get the best care possible for our lovely rescues. Any amount donated is always gratefully received 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 You can donate here: Or, via any bank transfer app direct to the charity's bank account. The details are on our website here: Thank you for your support! Berani and other dogs like her wouldn't be here were it not for the kindness and generosity of our donors 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🐾🐶😺❤❤❤

Lovina Animal Welfare

49,087 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Meghan Markle says she "wasn’t empowered to speak" in Royal Family as Duchess takes subtle swipe at the RF" GBnews😵‍💫 Well, darling dear, the BRF is not in the business of empowering dumb people to speak up and embarrass themselves and the monarchy; The Royals are there to listen to the British public and serve them🤷🏽‍♀️ This is why they kept Harry on script for years. This is Britain, not the US. Only the Monarch and Heir are expected to speak UP when the times demand; not Harry's random wannabe "activist" wife..🫠 Meg wanted to be seen and heard, she never wanted to serve or care for the British public; that is why we all joyfully showed her and Harry the door on their way out🤷🏽‍♀️ 6 years out, the bitterness at being shown the door is still killing them. When you hear daft statements like these, you realise that no matter the videos they post, the pictures the craft and the stories they invent to pretend they are happy on instagram, Harry and Meg are two of the most miserable and bitterly married people to exist🤦🏽‍♀️ Meg keep ranting about "finding her voice" when ironically, she has accomplished nothing in 6 years "with her voice" but twerking for views and destroying her own brand. Now, she cannot stand that people now know she is very basic and ordinary. She cannot stand that her titles and her children's titles mean nothing; even Harry's titles mean nothing. She failed at being a duchess, just like she failed at being an actress, a business woman, a leader, a philanthropist, a feminist, a cook, a podcaster..🤡 Meg does not comprehend that you cannot fake peace and happiness effectively, if you spend your life responding to strangers online; complaining and explaining yourself on podcasts, and trying to rectify lies you told with new lies, you are now telling🫠 Interestingly, she felt the need to sat "I do not suffer from imposter's syndrome. I feel like I am exactly where I am supposed to be right now"🤭 Actually the Truth is yes, anyone with a brain can see Meg is very fake and suffers from imposter's syndrome. The world called her out on it loudly when she pretended to be a cook earlier this year😏 Second, it is painfully obvious that she hates how she has failed at being a royal, hates that she has overplayed her hand and that she has backed herself in the corner. She hates that she has failed publicly and is being called out on it. In Life, there are things you cannot lie about: True happiness and fulfillment within yourself. You cannot fake it with words, your actions will reveal it🤷🏽‍♀️ Well and so, If Meg was were she wanted to be, she would not be so bitter at clapping back at strangers online and seeking public validation;🔥 If she was who she wanted to be, she would not spend her time cosplaying Catherine's life and plagiarise the story of every other successful women;🔥 If Meg had accomplished what she truly wanted in life, she wouldn't be posting vision boards at 45 and talk about what she wants to be in the future;😵‍💫 At last, if truly Meg was exactly living the Marriage and family life she wanted, she would be quietly enjoying that life instead of violating her own privacy to create a narrative🤷🏽‍♀️ True Happiness is in actions not empty lofty words😏 The People who have everything they wanted and are exactly living the life they wanted and the marriage they wanted, do not spend their time complaining and explaining themselves to strangers online or to the press. The Happiest people are too busy enjoying that happy life privately, ON THEIR TERMS, without seeking public approval👌 📹Getty via LoveWalesfamily❤️

Canellecitadelle

126,383 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Arguing with her is falling into her frame." –Rivelino EXAMPLE In this scene from Titanic, Rose knows that Cal is trying to impress her, so she purposely provokes him by doubting the size of the ship Rose is looking to see if she can get a reaction out of him. And she does. He reacts defensively and argues logically A double mistake When a woman tries to start an argument with you, she's testing to see if you're stupid enough to take her seriously If you do take her seriously and argue with her, you fall into her frame and essentially fall into her trap. Whereas if you treat her like an adorable petulant child, you pass the test and sidestep the trap In this scene, Cal reacts the wrong way to Rose's shit test. He falls into her frame by arguing with her and he tries to change her mind using facts ROSE: I don't see what the fuss is about. It doesn't look any bigger than Mauretania CAL: [facts logic boring boring] When a man tries to convince a woman by using facts and logic, she instinctively realizes that he doesn't understand women, how they feel, how they function This is a massive turn off She doesn't want to be with a man who doesn't understand her true feminine essence So what should a man say instead of arguing with her? My two favorite standard replies to any sort of petulant shit test from a girl are "You're precious" and "You're adorable" Remember, she is like a child She wants to feel your mastery over her –– and she wants to see that you have mastery over your own emotions If Cal knew how to handle Rose, he would avoid arguing with her. Instead, he would say something like this: ROSE: I don't see what the fuss is about. It doesn't look bigger than Mauretania CAL: Oh Rose, you're so adorable Much better If your girl says something to make you angry and you feel yourself losing your temper, instead of calling her stupid call her adorable "You're so fucking adorable" You can even keep the same angry tone Over time, you will start reframing and training your brain to see her as an adorable (petulant) child Remember, when you think in your mind "she is annoying", that means she has gotten to you, she has rattled you, and that's bad When you think in your mind "she is adorable", that means you see her like a child And why is she adorable? Well, she's your girl, right? If she isn't adorable –– if she really is stupid, annoying, complaining all the time, disrespecting you all the time, then maybe you need to let her go and find yourself another girl. It sounds like her heart is closed off to you But if she is your girl and you do love her, then she's adorable, and her "annoying" shit tests just mean that she misses you and needs your reassurance that you can handle her moods and her occasional feminine chaos She wants to feel your masculine strength, she wants to feel your amused mastery, your power and control over her emotions She wants to feel safe in your arms She wants to trust you
0:13

Sensitive content

"Arguing with her is falling into her frame." –Rivelino EXAMPLE In this scene from Titanic, Rose knows that Cal is trying to impress her, so she purposely provokes him by doubting the size of the ship Rose is looking to see if she can get a reaction out of him. And she does. He reacts defensively and argues logically A double mistake When a woman tries to start an argument with you, she's testing to see if you're stupid enough to take her seriously If you do take her seriously and argue with her, you fall into her frame and essentially fall into her trap. Whereas if you treat her like an adorable petulant child, you pass the test and sidestep the trap In this scene, Cal reacts the wrong way to Rose's shit test. He falls into her frame by arguing with her and he tries to change her mind using facts ROSE: I don't see what the fuss is about. It doesn't look any bigger than Mauretania CAL: [facts logic boring boring] When a man tries to convince a woman by using facts and logic, she instinctively realizes that he doesn't understand women, how they feel, how they function This is a massive turn off She doesn't want to be with a man who doesn't understand her true feminine essence So what should a man say instead of arguing with her? My two favorite standard replies to any sort of petulant shit test from a girl are "You're precious" and "You're adorable" Remember, she is like a child She wants to feel your mastery over her –– and she wants to see that you have mastery over your own emotions If Cal knew how to handle Rose, he would avoid arguing with her. Instead, he would say something like this: ROSE: I don't see what the fuss is about. It doesn't look bigger than Mauretania CAL: Oh Rose, you're so adorable Much better If your girl says something to make you angry and you feel yourself losing your temper, instead of calling her stupid call her adorable "You're so fucking adorable" You can even keep the same angry tone Over time, you will start reframing and training your brain to see her as an adorable (petulant) child Remember, when you think in your mind "she is annoying", that means she has gotten to you, she has rattled you, and that's bad When you think in your mind "she is adorable", that means you see her like a child And why is she adorable? Well, she's your girl, right? If she isn't adorable –– if she really is stupid, annoying, complaining all the time, disrespecting you all the time, then maybe you need to let her go and find yourself another girl. It sounds like her heart is closed off to you But if she is your girl and you do love her, then she's adorable, and her "annoying" shit tests just mean that she misses you and needs your reassurance that you can handle her moods and her occasional feminine chaos She wants to feel your masculine strength, she wants to feel your amused mastery, your power and control over her emotions She wants to feel safe in your arms She wants to trust you

Rivelino

257,675 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This is me & my kids celebrating my 1st yr of sobriety. Tuesday 7/14/26 we celebrated 9 yrs. I’ve been sober before, sometimes for years but I always got lazy or too smart or terminally unique but July 14/2017 I woke up to the same argument I’d had with my X for yrs. I was a failure & she deserved better. My feelings were hurt, my self esteem was low but I knew I deserved better. I packed a bag so I could leave & check into a hotel. This was my move since childhood. When things hurt I’d run to safety. I’d also start making calls because I deserved to be safe AND high. I got into my car & noticed my X’s car was gone. Maybe she took the kids with her? I ran back into the house & my 1 1/2 yr old angel Quinn & 4 yr old son Jax were standing there alone. They were so happy to see me. Both of their selfish parents had walked out & left them. In that moment everything changed. Call it a G-d shot or moment of clarity but in front of me was everything I’d ever dreamed of so I had to be 100% because there was a good chance I’d have to raise these babies by myself. I vowed to be healthy. & never let anyone hurt my feelings. My kids & I spent every day of the next 2 years together. They felt unconditionally loved & so did I. Because of sobriety we live a wonderful life. Many of you know my X has major issues & has put my kids & I in dangerous situations which makes my sobriety & protecting Jax & Quinn all the more satisfying. I’m grateful for every moment of my life.

Tom Arnold

220,864 просмотров • 10 часов назад

Lots of people are sleeping on Quinn Priester... I have a feeling this dude is going to make an impact with the major league club next year. Let’s talk about it. Adding velo to the sinker (SI) has been a constant emphasis since coming over via trade, and we already saw a minor increase last year. Avg SI velo (2024) 📈 • w/ PIT: 93.0 mph • w/ BOS: 93.8 mph NOTE: Remove his first two appearances where there wasn’t really any changes made, and his avg SI velo now sits at 94.2 mph. Games where SI sat 94+ mph 📈 • w/ PIT: 2 (of 23) • w/ BOS: 5 (of 10) He’s comfortably hit 96 and topped 97 mph for Worcester (seen in video attached), and has been grinding on a velo program this winter as well. Other top velos, just for fun… • FF: 96.3 mph* • SL: 92.3 mph • CU: 83.5 mph* • CH: 92 mph* • FC: 94.4 mph* *indicates top velo was w/ BOS — On top of this, we all know that Bres/Bailey & Co. love their whiff and secondary offerings. Priester took a huge step forward last year in both of these categories. Overall whiff 📈 • w/ PIT: 29.8% • w: BOS: 35.4% Arsenal whiff w/ BOS 📈 • SI: 22% • FF: 30% • FC: 42% • SL: 48% (‼️) • CU: 43%** **hot take: SI/SL combo are his carrying pitches, but his best pitch is his CH — Clearly, there’s something there. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a major usage change. Here’s what I would propose: • FA (FF/SI/FC): 46.3% ➡️ 30% - SI: 20% (“get me over” or “need it” kind of pitch; needs to be for a strike, low in zone; CH plays off it) - FC: 9% (would love to use it more, but had a limited sample size in 2024; start off as a LHH-exclusive like Garett Whitlock showcased; needs to either be elevated (tunnel w/ FF) or down+out (tunnel w/ SL) - FF: 1% (similar to what we saw Bello implement… only deploy in key situations; must be elevated) • SL: 31.8% ➡️ 35% - emphasis on gloveside target against both LHH/RHH; vs LHH, catcher sets up more middle/out - maybe try some armside vs LHH to dupe batters? • CH: 14% ➡️ 25% - best pitch results in MLB (.167 BAA, .167 SLG, 29% whiff in limited sample size) but can’t be overused - need to tunnel w/ SI… make sure low in/out of zone; see: Whitlock • CU: 8% ➡️ 10% - LHH exclusive offering, tunnels w/ elevated FC/FF - needs to miss low Overall: SI “first” for strikes with a very heavy dosage of SL/CH mixed in vs both LHH/RHH. FC/CB to LHH only. Elevated FF only in certain sequences. I’ve attached some specific videos to further emphasize my points. • Clip #1: Bogaerts whiff on CH • Clip #2: disgusting SLs to RHHs • Clip #3: Priester sinkers (T97 mph) • Clip #4: just pure nastiness Oh, and a friendly reminder: he’s just 24 years old. There is so much potential to tap into here. The stuff, for one, is there and only getting better. My favorite Red Sox pitcher right now is by far Garrett Whitlock. I see a little bit of baby Whitty in Priester’s delivery, frame, and stuff. 👀 — Alrighty, that was a lot lol. I hope everyone enjoyed. If you have questions, comments, or even player requests, feel free to reach out! I am super excited to see what Priester can do in 2025 and beyond. What do you think? ⬇️

G.G.

54,654 просмотров • 1 год назад