Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

3,000 years of business evolution. One timeline. 📍 One wall. 🧱 One MASTERPIECE. 🎨✨ Legendary artist Qiu Zhijie 🧑‍🎨 mapped the ENTIRE history of global commerce in a single mural: 💰 Ancient Markets 🐫 The Silk Road 🏭 Industrial Age 🚀 Digital Transformation 📱 Mobile Commerce ⛓️ Web3 🤖... show more

Peng 沈鹏

2,155 subscribers

3,316,649 views • 13 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Arts Science & Technology Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🛍️ Every time you ordered from Flipkart or Myntra—there was a name on the box you never paid attention to. 📦 Ekart! 🚚 3 billion shipments a year. 95% of India's pincodes. The silent engine behind India's largest e-commerce group. And this week, Flipkart made its biggest bet yet—opening that entire network to every small business in India. And quietly preparing to take on Swiggy and Zomato. 👀 CNBC-TV18's Aishwarya Anand went inside one of its warehouses in Gurugram to find out how this machine actually works—and what it's being built for next. 📺 #Flipkart #Ekart #FlipkartMinutes #QuickCommerce #CNBCTV18Digital #Ecommerce #BigBillionDays Hemant Badri

🛍️ Every time you ordered from Flipkart or Myntra—there was a name on the box you never paid attention to. 📦 Ekart! 🚚 3 billion shipments a year. 95% of India's pincodes. The silent engine behind India's largest e-commerce group. And this week, Flipkart made its biggest bet yet—opening that entire network to every small business in India. And quietly preparing to take on Swiggy and Zomato. 👀 CNBC-TV18's Aishwarya Anand went inside one of its warehouses in Gurugram to find out how this machine actually works—and what it's being built for next. 📺 #Flipkart #Ekart #FlipkartMinutes #QuickCommerce #CNBCTV18Digital #Ecommerce #BigBillionDays Hemant Badri

CNBC-TV18

192,433 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Speculation, but this is the vision. If GameStop buys eBay, the play is not “fixing an auction site.” It is turning every person on Earth into a global seller. Scan an item with AI. List it in seconds. Go live from anywhere. Reach millions of buyers. Accept any currency. Verify every item. Prove ownership. Settle transactions seamlessly. Ship through trusted rails. That is not e-commerce. That is a global commerce operating system. eBay brings the marketplace. GameStop brings the trust layer. AI brings instant listings. Live commerce brings attention. Authentication brings legitimacy. Bitcoin brings neutral settlement. The buyer pays however they want. The seller receives whatever they choose. The item is verified. The transaction is trusted. Everyone gets their own QVC. Every collectible gets a global market. Every small seller gets worldwide reach. If Ryan Cohen pulls this off, Wall Street will realize too late that GameStop was never just a turnaround. It was the foundation for the next era of retail. Anyone can sell. Anyone can buy. Any currency can be used. Every transaction can be trusted. That is the future.

🚨 Speculation, but this is the vision. If GameStop buys eBay, the play is not “fixing an auction site.” It is turning every person on Earth into a global seller. Scan an item with AI. List it in seconds. Go live from anywhere. Reach millions of buyers. Accept any currency. Verify every item. Prove ownership. Settle transactions seamlessly. Ship through trusted rails. That is not e-commerce. That is a global commerce operating system. eBay brings the marketplace. GameStop brings the trust layer. AI brings instant listings. Live commerce brings attention. Authentication brings legitimacy. Bitcoin brings neutral settlement. The buyer pays however they want. The seller receives whatever they choose. The item is verified. The transaction is trusted. Everyone gets their own QVC. Every collectible gets a global market. Every small seller gets worldwide reach. If Ryan Cohen pulls this off, Wall Street will realize too late that GameStop was never just a turnaround. It was the foundation for the next era of retail. Anyone can sell. Anyone can buy. Any currency can be used. Every transaction can be trusted. That is the future.

MD

44,532 views • 4 months ago

🚀 LinkersMap Project Update Two Months Since Launch One month on the InterLink Private Mainnet and the momentum is real! 📈 🌍 Growing Global Reach ✅ 1,400+ verified businesses registered across: Africa 🌍 Asia 🌏 Europe 🌍 North America 🌎 South America 🌎 ✅ 1M+ visits to the LinkersMap app ✅ 700k+ impressions on the official X account alone ✅ Direct reach into InterLink’s community of approximately 10 million users 🔧 Mainnet Progress LinkersMap has successfully moved from Testnet → Private Mainnet and is now in the final testing phase before live commerce begins: • 💳 Payment flows with $ITL • 🚚 Shipping-cost calculations •🛒 Full buyer–seller experience from start to finish 🔄 $LMP ↔ $ITL Swap Testing The team is also actively testing $LMP ↔ $ITL swaps in preparation for the launch of $LMP, the first Business Token on the InterLink Business Token Exchange (IBTE). 💎 $LMP Utility and Tokenomics $LMP is a fixed-supply IRC-20 Business Utility Token with a maximum supply of 100 million tokens. Every completed transaction on LinkersMap triggers a 5% fee, which is used to: • 🔁 Buy back $LMP • 🔥 Permanently burn $LMP •📉 Link real commerce activity to token scarcity 🗺️ Building the Geo-Commerce Layer LinkersMap is more than a marketplace. It is building the geo-commerce layer for the InterLink ecosystem, bringing together: • ✅ Verified businesses • 🛍️ Products and services • 💰 $ITL payments • 📍 Map-based discovery 📌 What Comes Next? Phase I: Registration and Listings → Nearly complete ✅ Phase II: Live Business Activity → Approaching fast 🚀 More updates are coming very soon. Stay tuned! Real commerce chapter is about to begin! 🔔🔥 📝 Register Your Business for Free 👉 InterLink Labs 👤 + 🌐 Dr Altcoin ✝️ LinkersMap Arif Ahmed Core Ambassador | Interlink Labs KV Reina | InterLink Labs #LinkersMap #LMP #InterLink #ITLG #ITL #Web3 #Blockchain #Commerce #BusinessToken #DigitalEconomy

🚀 LinkersMap Project Update Two Months Since Launch One month on the InterLink Private Mainnet and the momentum is real! 📈 🌍 Growing Global Reach ✅ 1,400+ verified businesses registered across: Africa 🌍 Asia 🌏 Europe 🌍 North America 🌎 South America 🌎 ✅ 1M+ visits to the LinkersMap app ✅ 700k+ impressions on the official X account alone ✅ Direct reach into InterLink’s community of approximately 10 million users 🔧 Mainnet Progress LinkersMap has successfully moved from Testnet → Private Mainnet and is now in the final testing phase before live commerce begins: • 💳 Payment flows with $ITL • 🚚 Shipping-cost calculations •🛒 Full buyer–seller experience from start to finish 🔄 $LMP ↔ $ITL Swap Testing The team is also actively testing $LMP ↔ $ITL swaps in preparation for the launch of $LMP, the first Business Token on the InterLink Business Token Exchange (IBTE). 💎 $LMP Utility and Tokenomics $LMP is a fixed-supply IRC-20 Business Utility Token with a maximum supply of 100 million tokens. Every completed transaction on LinkersMap triggers a 5% fee, which is used to: • 🔁 Buy back $LMP • 🔥 Permanently burn $LMP •📉 Link real commerce activity to token scarcity 🗺️ Building the Geo-Commerce Layer LinkersMap is more than a marketplace. It is building the geo-commerce layer for the InterLink ecosystem, bringing together: • ✅ Verified businesses • 🛍️ Products and services • 💰 $ITL payments • 📍 Map-based discovery 📌 What Comes Next? Phase I: Registration and Listings → Nearly complete ✅ Phase II: Live Business Activity → Approaching fast 🚀 More updates are coming very soon. Stay tuned! Real commerce chapter is about to begin! 🔔🔥 📝 Register Your Business for Free 👉 InterLink Labs 👤 + 🌐 Dr Altcoin ✝️ LinkersMap Arif Ahmed Core Ambassador | Interlink Labs KV Reina | InterLink Labs #LinkersMap #LMP #InterLink #ITLG #ITL #Web3 #Blockchain #Commerce #BusinessToken #DigitalEconomy

Tekkaus® | InterLink • MOD • T2 Community Builder

42,359 views • 21 days ago

Peter Thiel: "Competition is for losers" "Competition is for losers, which got people's attention, because we normally believe the opposite. We believe that the losers are the people who don't compete intensely enough. You're a loser if you're not competitive. But what if you're a loser because you're too obsessed with competing? If you're too focused on competing, maybe you're losing sight of what's really important." Thiel explains the distinction most people miss: "The most important distinction in business that people don't talk about enough is that there are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive, and there are companies that have monopolies. If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur, it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." He frames this as an unconventional truth: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms. A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away."

Peter Thiel: "Competition is for losers" "Competition is for losers, which got people's attention, because we normally believe the opposite. We believe that the losers are the people who don't compete intensely enough. You're a loser if you're not competitive. But what if you're a loser because you're too obsessed with competing? If you're too focused on competing, maybe you're losing sight of what's really important." Thiel explains the distinction most people miss: "The most important distinction in business that people don't talk about enough is that there are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive, and there are companies that have monopolies. If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur, it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." He frames this as an unconventional truth: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms. A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away."

Jaynit

55,406 views • 5 months ago

Today we're announcing Lightfield's $47M Series A led by a16z to reimagine CRM as a world model of a business. For agents to do customer-facing work, they need to understand how your business actually works. Salesforce wasn't designed for this. It was built 20+ years ago for humans to update records. Layer agentic processes on top and you get low quality output, because the underlying data is incomplete and lacks the structure agents need. Lightfield updates itself from every interaction, forming a trustworthy model of your business for people and agents. Since launching last November, 5,000+ companies have signed up - and we're ripping out legacy CRM at mature organizations with hundreds of users. Companies on Lightfield grow faster than their competitors. It finds prospects that look like your best customers and books meetings with them. It captures commitments from every conversation and automates follow-ups. It diagnoses weaknesses in your funnel and learns from your best sellers to codify what works. The companies of the future will run on a business world model, not a Salesforce-era database. Our mission is to put that capability in the hands of every employee, and every agent, at every company.

Today we're announcing Lightfield's $47M Series A led by a16z to reimagine CRM as a world model of a business. For agents to do customer-facing work, they need to understand how your business actually works. Salesforce wasn't designed for this. It was built 20+ years ago for humans to update records. Layer agentic processes on top and you get low quality output, because the underlying data is incomplete and lacks the structure agents need. Lightfield updates itself from every interaction, forming a trustworthy model of your business for people and agents. Since launching last November, 5,000+ companies have signed up - and we're ripping out legacy CRM at mature organizations with hundreds of users. Companies on Lightfield grow faster than their competitors. It finds prospects that look like your best customers and books meetings with them. It captures commitments from every conversation and automates follow-ups. It diagnoses weaknesses in your funnel and learns from your best sellers to codify what works. The companies of the future will run on a business world model, not a Salesforce-era database. Our mission is to put that capability in the hands of every employee, and every agent, at every company.

Keith Peiris

1,041,217 views • 17 hours ago

Gavin Baker on the one variable that now dominates all others in AI compute: "the more memory you put with flop for a given unit of compute, the more tokens you get out -- it's the single most important thing you could do to increase token output per unit of compute." This is him laying out why the whole AI buildout now turns on memory, why breaking a supply agreement can end your entire franchise, and what Nvidia quietly writes into every equity check it signs. "You might blow up your entire business and your franchise by breaking an LTA." "If you break your LTA and then in the next two or three years for any reason leverage shifts back to the memory guys -- you're out of business." "Essentially every time they haven't taken an equity stake in something, it's been a mistake, they've taken equity stakes in everything essentially except the memory companies." Bookmark & watch ↓

Gavin Baker on the one variable that now dominates all others in AI compute: "the more memory you put with flop for a given unit of compute, the more tokens you get out -- it's the single most important thing you could do to increase token output per unit of compute." This is him laying out why the whole AI buildout now turns on memory, why breaking a supply agreement can end your entire franchise, and what Nvidia quietly writes into every equity check it signs. "You might blow up your entire business and your franchise by breaking an LTA." "If you break your LTA and then in the next two or three years for any reason leverage shifts back to the memory guys -- you're out of business." "Essentially every time they haven't taken an equity stake in something, it's been a mistake, they've taken equity stakes in everything essentially except the memory companies." Bookmark & watch ↓

Fireside Alpha

18,521 views • 1 month ago

15-year-old American made $14,000 in his first month selling a service most marketers have never even heard of. Every time someone searches for a business on Google - the first thing they see is an AI response, not a website and not an ad. ChatGPT gives 5-6 recommendations and if a business isn't there - the customer goes to a competitor without a single click. His secret - AI visibility. He optimized local businesses to appear in ChatGPT responses, Google AI Overview and Meta AI instead of paying for ads that no longer work. He'd walk up to a business owner, show them that their business didn't appear in AI responses and ask if they wanted to fix it. Almost everyone said yes immediately. 8 clients at $800 in the first month, 20 clients in the second - because every satisfied client referred him to someone else. This isn't a marketing problem - it's a visibility problem. And he was the only one solving it in his city.

15-year-old American made $14,000 in his first month selling a service most marketers have never even heard of. Every time someone searches for a business on Google - the first thing they see is an AI response, not a website and not an ad. ChatGPT gives 5-6 recommendations and if a business isn't there - the customer goes to a competitor without a single click. His secret - AI visibility. He optimized local businesses to appear in ChatGPT responses, Google AI Overview and Meta AI instead of paying for ads that no longer work. He'd walk up to a business owner, show them that their business didn't appear in AI responses and ask if they wanted to fix it. Almost everyone said yes immediately. 8 clients at $800 in the first month, 20 clients in the second - because every satisfied client referred him to someone else. This isn't a marketing problem - it's a visibility problem. And he was the only one solving it in his city.

Noisy

43,115 views • 4 months ago

Peter Thiel on how to build the next billion-dollar startup: "Every moment in the history of business happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg won't be starting a social networking site. The next Bill Gates won't start an operating system. The next Elon Musk won't start a Tesla electric car company." Peter's entire thesis rejects the idea of formulas in business. As he puts it: "Science starts with things that are experimentally repeatable, but great businesses are zero to one; they're always one-of-a-kind. There is always this anti-formulaic quality." So what's the one theme he keeps coming back to? "This need for differentiation. What are you doing that nobody else is doing? What ideas do you have that nobody else has? What great business are you working on that no one else is working on?" He continues: "If you're a founder or an entrepreneur, you should always aim to build a monopoly where you're the only person in the world doing what you're doing. There really are only two kinds of businesses in this world: businesses that are in crazy competition and one-of-a-kind businesses that are monopolies." On why you shouldn't just iterate your way to success: "The core thing is to have a great product, and then you can always improve and iterate on that. If you're just trying to optimize and you don't have a great product, that rarely works." His advice? Think 5 to 10 years ahead: "Why will this be a really valuable business in 5 to 10 years? How's the competitive landscape going to develop? These are hard questions to answer, but the great entrepreneurs I know always have some perspective on it. When I was playing chess, one of the early lessons I learned was, a bad plan is still always better than no plan at all." On what makes work meaningful: "It's great to be working on problems where if you weren't working on them, nobody else would do them. If we weren't doing this, this problem would absolutely not be tackled. That's what's meaningful. Whereas when you're competing, you're already, by definition, number two at least in a category." Build something only you can build.

Peter Thiel on how to build the next billion-dollar startup: "Every moment in the history of business happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg won't be starting a social networking site. The next Bill Gates won't start an operating system. The next Elon Musk won't start a Tesla electric car company." Peter's entire thesis rejects the idea of formulas in business. As he puts it: "Science starts with things that are experimentally repeatable, but great businesses are zero to one; they're always one-of-a-kind. There is always this anti-formulaic quality." So what's the one theme he keeps coming back to? "This need for differentiation. What are you doing that nobody else is doing? What ideas do you have that nobody else has? What great business are you working on that no one else is working on?" He continues: "If you're a founder or an entrepreneur, you should always aim to build a monopoly where you're the only person in the world doing what you're doing. There really are only two kinds of businesses in this world: businesses that are in crazy competition and one-of-a-kind businesses that are monopolies." On why you shouldn't just iterate your way to success: "The core thing is to have a great product, and then you can always improve and iterate on that. If you're just trying to optimize and you don't have a great product, that rarely works." His advice? Think 5 to 10 years ahead: "Why will this be a really valuable business in 5 to 10 years? How's the competitive landscape going to develop? These are hard questions to answer, but the great entrepreneurs I know always have some perspective on it. When I was playing chess, one of the early lessons I learned was, a bad plan is still always better than no plan at all." On what makes work meaningful: "It's great to be working on problems where if you weren't working on them, nobody else would do them. If we weren't doing this, this problem would absolutely not be tackled. That's what's meaningful. Whereas when you're competing, you're already, by definition, number two at least in a category." Build something only you can build.

Jaynit

77,758 views • 8 months ago

Until They Produce EVEN ONE Study Showing Vaccinated Kids Are HEALTHIER - We Have a Crisis The evidence is mounting, and the silence is deafening. Until someone…ANYONE…produces at least one study, if not 10, comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children and shows the unvaccinated are actually sicker... this is very strong science pointing in ONE direction. I'm challenging every nation, every major medical institution worldwide: DO THIS STUDY YOURSELF and see if you get a different result! Let's drop the bias. Let's drop the sides. This is about OUR CHILDREN. Are these products making our kids healthier... or NOT? If they're NOT - if they're making us sicker- then why are we doing this? This simple comparison should NOT be avoided. It should NOT be attacked. It should be celebrated and done by EVERY institution on Earth! All of science is warning us: This is the first generation of children who will NOT live as long as their parents. We're reversing the course of longevity and health in our species. If you think you're doing the right thing for your kids... think again. They're facing shorter, sicker lives. We need an international conversation on this IMMEDIATELY! Senator Alex Antic

Until They Produce EVEN ONE Study Showing Vaccinated Kids Are HEALTHIER - We Have a Crisis The evidence is mounting, and the silence is deafening. Until someone…ANYONE…produces at least one study, if not 10, comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children and shows the unvaccinated are actually sicker... this is very strong science pointing in ONE direction. I'm challenging every nation, every major medical institution worldwide: DO THIS STUDY YOURSELF and see if you get a different result! Let's drop the bias. Let's drop the sides. This is about OUR CHILDREN. Are these products making our kids healthier... or NOT? If they're NOT - if they're making us sicker- then why are we doing this? This simple comparison should NOT be avoided. It should NOT be attacked. It should be celebrated and done by EVERY institution on Earth! All of science is warning us: This is the first generation of children who will NOT live as long as their parents. We're reversing the course of longevity and health in our species. If you think you're doing the right thing for your kids... think again. They're facing shorter, sicker lives. We need an international conversation on this IMMEDIATELY! Senator Alex Antic

Del Bigtree

130,895 views • 7 months ago

Did you know that practically every city on Earth experienced a "great fire" during the 1800s? Go see for yourself; look up your own city's name plus "great fire" on Google. Then, once you start actually digging into the photographs of these events that ravaged every corner of our world, around the exact same time...you'll notice that everywhere you look, you see STONE BUILDINGS being turned to sand. Yeah...fires don't do that. Oh and by the way, this isn't the first time this type of worldwide destruction campaign has happened. There are remnants of several other board-wipe cataclysms that have occurred across the world, seemingly being conducted in all sorts of different types of ways (floods, mudfloods, mass-melts, petrification, etc.), as if someone (or someTHING) is spinning a wheel every few hundred years to decide how to exterminate everyone. Welcome to the Reset Cycle rabbit hole. You're going to want to sit down for this one... [video cred: MY LUNCH BREAK]

Did you know that practically every city on Earth experienced a "great fire" during the 1800s? Go see for yourself; look up your own city's name plus "great fire" on Google. Then, once you start actually digging into the photographs of these events that ravaged every corner of our world, around the exact same time...you'll notice that everywhere you look, you see STONE BUILDINGS being turned to sand. Yeah...fires don't do that. Oh and by the way, this isn't the first time this type of worldwide destruction campaign has happened. There are remnants of several other board-wipe cataclysms that have occurred across the world, seemingly being conducted in all sorts of different types of ways (floods, mudfloods, mass-melts, petrification, etc.), as if someone (or someTHING) is spinning a wheel every few hundred years to decide how to exterminate everyone. Welcome to the Reset Cycle rabbit hole. You're going to want to sit down for this one... [video cred: MY LUNCH BREAK]

Ben Wehrman

31,444 views • 7 days ago

been playing with whop's new blueprints feature and a part of it changes the whole math on starting a business.. a blueprint is a full business ready to run. not a template you fill in. the actual site, the checkout, tracking, the whop pixel, analytics, all of it live from the first second. you pick a bluepint, name it and deploy, that's it. you're on a .whop.app url taking real payments with nothing left to wire up. i deployed one in the time it takes to read this and these aren't thin little landing pages. multi-page sites, customer accounts, carts, booking, subscriptions, reviews, checkout. full commercial sites out of the box, hosted on Whop for free. the analytics sit in the same dashboard. traffic, conversions, revenue, MRR, churn, ad spend, all in one place,you deploy and you can already see everything. but here's the part that actually that got me invested into it. instead of just building and deploying blueprints, it has other features in-built which can make the whole process easier and every business that gets onboarded through a blueprint you built earns you 10% of whop's gross profit from that business. recurring, per business, for as long as they run. so building a blueprint is its own business. you build one for a niche, put it out there, and every business that runs on it keeps paying you while you do nothing. i spent years thinking distribution was the hard part. build a good blueprint and the distribution is the business.

been playing with whop's new blueprints feature and a part of it changes the whole math on starting a business.. a blueprint is a full business ready to run. not a template you fill in. the actual site, the checkout, tracking, the whop pixel, analytics, all of it live from the first second. you pick a bluepint, name it and deploy, that's it. you're on a .whop.app url taking real payments with nothing left to wire up. i deployed one in the time it takes to read this and these aren't thin little landing pages. multi-page sites, customer accounts, carts, booking, subscriptions, reviews, checkout. full commercial sites out of the box, hosted on Whop for free. the analytics sit in the same dashboard. traffic, conversions, revenue, MRR, churn, ad spend, all in one place,you deploy and you can already see everything. but here's the part that actually that got me invested into it. instead of just building and deploying blueprints, it has other features in-built which can make the whole process easier and every business that gets onboarded through a blueprint you built earns you 10% of whop's gross profit from that business. recurring, per business, for as long as they run. so building a blueprint is its own business. you build one for a niche, put it out there, and every business that runs on it keeps paying you while you do nothing. i spent years thinking distribution was the hard part. build a good blueprint and the distribution is the business.

Sulfur

42,114 views • 13 days ago

Peter Thiel on why the best businesses never compete: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms." His point is simple: "A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away." Peter explains that the most important distinction in business is one nobody talks about enough. "There are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive and there are companies that have monopolies." His go-to example of a bad business? Restaurants. "Opening a restaurant is super competitive and nobody ever makes any money doing it." His example of a great business: Google. "Google has had no competition in search since 2002 when it definitively distanced itself from Microsoft and Yahoo, and it's been making enormous profits for the dozen years or so ever since." So what should founders actually aim for? "If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur—it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." True market power means never having to compete in the first place.

Peter Thiel on why the best businesses never compete: "Most people believe that capitalism and competition are synonyms. I believe capitalism and competition are antonyms." His point is simple: "A capitalist is someone who's in the business of accumulating capital. A world of perfect competition is a world where all the profits are competed away." Peter explains that the most important distinction in business is one nobody talks about enough. "There are two kinds of companies in this world. There are companies that are competitive and there are companies that have monopolies." His go-to example of a bad business? Restaurants. "Opening a restaurant is super competitive and nobody ever makes any money doing it." His example of a great business: Google. "Google has had no competition in search since 2002 when it definitively distanced itself from Microsoft and Yahoo, and it's been making enormous profits for the dozen years or so ever since." So what should founders actually aim for? "If you're a one-of-a-kind company, a happy company that's doing something different, you are a monopoly. It is the goal of every founder, every entrepreneur—it should be their goal to try to build a monopoly business." True market power means never having to compete in the first place.

Big Brain Business

73,938 views • 8 months ago

Jensen Huang just replaced the most important metric in global economics. Not trade volume. Not oil output. Not manufacturing. Compute. Huang: “Compute equals GDP. I know that for certain.” He did not say probably. He said certain. If your nation does not produce compute, it does not produce intelligence. If it does not produce intelligence, it does not produce revenue. Two links in the chain. Miss one and the whole thing breaks. Huang: “Not one country in the future will say, ‘Guess what, we’re gonna opt out on intelligence.’” Because opting out of compute is not a strategic decision. It is an extinction schedule. Every country that does not build its own inference capacity becomes a tenant in someone else’s infrastructure. Not an ally. Not a partner. A dependent. And dependents do not negotiate terms. They accept them. But this is not just a story about nations. Huang: “The entire software industry will be token-driven.” Every product. Every platform. Every service you touch. The entire business model of software is about to be measured in tokens consumed. Not seats sold. Not licenses renewed. Tokens burned. Software used to be a thing you bought. Now it is a thing that thinks. And thinking costs compute. Every query. Every action. Every decision the machine makes on your behalf. The meter is always running. Huang: “The entire internet industry could take 100% of their CapEx and make it AI because it’s better.” Not ten percent. Not a pilot program. One hundred percent. The moment any internet service rebuilds itself on generative intelligence, it outperforms every version that came before it. Search. Ads. Recommendation. Infrastructure. All of it. Better on contact. CapEx follows. All of it. Trillions moving in one direction with no offramp. The companies still budgeting AI as a line item are telling you exactly how much they understand. AI is not the line item. AI is the budget. The global economy is being re-denominated in a currency most people have not even heard of yet. Tokens. Whoever controls the supply of that currency is not playing in the new economy. They are the house. And the house does not lose.

Jensen Huang just replaced the most important metric in global economics. Not trade volume. Not oil output. Not manufacturing. Compute. Huang: “Compute equals GDP. I know that for certain.” He did not say probably. He said certain. If your nation does not produce compute, it does not produce intelligence. If it does not produce intelligence, it does not produce revenue. Two links in the chain. Miss one and the whole thing breaks. Huang: “Not one country in the future will say, ‘Guess what, we’re gonna opt out on intelligence.’” Because opting out of compute is not a strategic decision. It is an extinction schedule. Every country that does not build its own inference capacity becomes a tenant in someone else’s infrastructure. Not an ally. Not a partner. A dependent. And dependents do not negotiate terms. They accept them. But this is not just a story about nations. Huang: “The entire software industry will be token-driven.” Every product. Every platform. Every service you touch. The entire business model of software is about to be measured in tokens consumed. Not seats sold. Not licenses renewed. Tokens burned. Software used to be a thing you bought. Now it is a thing that thinks. And thinking costs compute. Every query. Every action. Every decision the machine makes on your behalf. The meter is always running. Huang: “The entire internet industry could take 100% of their CapEx and make it AI because it’s better.” Not ten percent. Not a pilot program. One hundred percent. The moment any internet service rebuilds itself on generative intelligence, it outperforms every version that came before it. Search. Ads. Recommendation. Infrastructure. All of it. Better on contact. CapEx follows. All of it. Trillions moving in one direction with no offramp. The companies still budgeting AI as a line item are telling you exactly how much they understand. AI is not the line item. AI is the budget. The global economy is being re-denominated in a currency most people have not even heard of yet. Tokens. Whoever controls the supply of that currency is not playing in the new economy. They are the house. And the house does not lose.

Dustin

43,505 views • 5 months ago

$Elon Musk just put a number on the flaw at the center of Nvidia’s empire. Wall Street has not done the math yet. Nvidia’s Blackwell is the most sought-after silicon on Earth. Every AI lab wants it. Every sovereign nation is bidding for it. Blackwell runs every model, for every company, in every data center on the planet. That universality built the empire. It is also the fracture point. Musk: “We believe the AI5 chip will be about a third of the power of an Nvidia Blackwell for roughly comparable performance. And much less than 10% of the cost.” One-third the power. Comparable performance. Less than ten percent of the cost. Musk: “This is a chip that is very much optimized for the Tesla AI software stack. It’s not meant to be a general purpose chip.” Nvidia builds silicon that serves a million different customers. Every transistor spent on universal compatibility is a transistor not dedicated to one task. Tesla is building silicon for exactly one customer. Itself. When you strip away every function you will never call, you do not get a lesser chip. You get a weapon. Here is what the market refuses to see. Data centers drink unlimited power from the grid. Robots run on batteries. Musk: “In order to have a functional robot, you have to have a great AI chip. And it needs to be an inexpensive chip and it needs to be very power efficient.” You cannot put a Blackwell inside a walking machine. It would drain the battery before it crossed the room. The entire AI revolution lives inside air-conditioned buildings bolted to the electrical grid. Musk is not competing for that market. He is engineering the silicon that survives outside of it. One-third the power is not a spec sheet footnote. It is the physics threshold that severs intelligence from the wall socket. Without that number, every robot on Earth stays tethered. With it, the algorithm walks. Less than ten percent of the cost is not a pricing strategy. It is the line where a machine brain stops being a capital expenditure and becomes a commodity component. When the chip inside a humanoid costs less than the motors in its legs, you do not manufacture hundreds of robots. You manufacture millions. Wall Street is valuing the AI revolution by who dominates the data center. Musk is building the only silicon designed to leave one. Nvidia built the brain of the cloud. Musk is building the brain of the physical world. No one has priced that in yet.$

Elon Musk just put a number on the flaw at the center of Nvidia’s empire. Wall Street has not done the math yet. Nvidia’s Blackwell is the most sought-after silicon on Earth. Every AI lab wants it. Every sovereign nation is bidding for it. Blackwell runs every model, for every company, in every data center on the planet. That universality built the empire. It is also the fracture point. Musk: “We believe the AI5 chip will be about a third of the power of an Nvidia Blackwell for roughly comparable performance. And much less than 10% of the cost.” One-third the power. Comparable performance. Less than ten percent of the cost. Musk: “This is a chip that is very much optimized for the Tesla AI software stack. It’s not meant to be a general purpose chip.” Nvidia builds silicon that serves a million different customers. Every transistor spent on universal compatibility is a transistor not dedicated to one task. Tesla is building silicon for exactly one customer. Itself. When you strip away every function you will never call, you do not get a lesser chip. You get a weapon. Here is what the market refuses to see. Data centers drink unlimited power from the grid. Robots run on batteries. Musk: “In order to have a functional robot, you have to have a great AI chip. And it needs to be an inexpensive chip and it needs to be very power efficient.” You cannot put a Blackwell inside a walking machine. It would drain the battery before it crossed the room. The entire AI revolution lives inside air-conditioned buildings bolted to the electrical grid. Musk is not competing for that market. He is engineering the silicon that survives outside of it. One-third the power is not a spec sheet footnote. It is the physics threshold that severs intelligence from the wall socket. Without that number, every robot on Earth stays tethered. With it, the algorithm walks. Less than ten percent of the cost is not a pricing strategy. It is the line where a machine brain stops being a capital expenditure and becomes a commodity component. When the chip inside a humanoid costs less than the motors in its legs, you do not manufacture hundreds of robots. You manufacture millions. Wall Street is valuing the AI revolution by who dominates the data center. Musk is building the only silicon designed to leave one. Nvidia built the brain of the cloud. Musk is building the brain of the physical world. No one has priced that in yet.

Dustin

160,633 views • 4 months ago

Paul Tudor Jones called the 1987 crash to the week - shorted straight into it - and walked away up over 100% while Wall Street lost a quarter of its value in a single day he does not chase. he waits for the setup nobody else sees this time the setup is AI "the amount of money going into this makes the dot com era look small" "the path of least resistance is stocks go higher and then something breaks" the man who built one of the most feared macro funds on Earth by being early on every crisis - 1987, dot com, 2008 - is telling you exactly where the risk sits now

Paul Tudor Jones called the 1987 crash to the week - shorted straight into it - and walked away up over 100% while Wall Street lost a quarter of its value in a single day he does not chase. he waits for the setup nobody else sees this time the setup is AI "the amount of money going into this makes the dot com era look small" "the path of least resistance is stocks go higher and then something breaks" the man who built one of the most feared macro funds on Earth by being early on every crisis - 1987, dot com, 2008 - is telling you exactly where the risk sits now

Loofy

77,351 views • 1 month ago

Jensen Huang just validated Elon Musk’s entire ecosystem in a single breath. Not one product. All of it. Huang: “The work he’s doing in Grok, self-driving cars, and Optimus. These are all world-class. Every single one of them is revolutionary. Every single one of them is going to be a gigantic opportunity.” To the public, a chatbot, a car, and a robot look like three separate bets. They are one project. The total automation of human cognition and physical labor. A digital brain. A spatial nervous system. A physical body. Musk is building all three simultaneously. Huang is supplying the compute to fuse them. Huang: “We do a lot of business with Tesla and xAI. Elon is an extraordinary engineer, and I love working with him. We’ve built some amazing computers together, and we’re going to build many more.” This is not a vendor relationship. It is the most consequential technological alliance in history and most people think it is a business partnership. Then Huang said what should end every debate about Optimus. Huang: “This is the first robot that really has a chance to achieve the high volume and technology scale necessary to advance technology.” Huang: “Right around the corner. Likely to be the next multi-trillion dollar industry.” The humanoid robot race will not be won in a research lab. It will be won on the manufacturing floor. Every other robotics company on earth can build a robot. Tesla can flood the planet with them. Because Tesla already knows how to stamp metal, build batteries, and deploy autonomous inference at global scale. The rest of the industry has prototypes. Tesla has the most sophisticated manufacturing operation on earth. When the world’s leading chipmaker calls your robot the next multi-trillion dollar industry, the debate is over. One supplies the chips. One builds everything the chips make possible. When that infrastructure scales across Grok, FSD, and Optimus simultaneously, the question stops being whether this changes everything. It becomes how fast.

Jensen Huang just validated Elon Musk’s entire ecosystem in a single breath. Not one product. All of it. Huang: “The work he’s doing in Grok, self-driving cars, and Optimus. These are all world-class. Every single one of them is revolutionary. Every single one of them is going to be a gigantic opportunity.” To the public, a chatbot, a car, and a robot look like three separate bets. They are one project. The total automation of human cognition and physical labor. A digital brain. A spatial nervous system. A physical body. Musk is building all three simultaneously. Huang is supplying the compute to fuse them. Huang: “We do a lot of business with Tesla and xAI. Elon is an extraordinary engineer, and I love working with him. We’ve built some amazing computers together, and we’re going to build many more.” This is not a vendor relationship. It is the most consequential technological alliance in history and most people think it is a business partnership. Then Huang said what should end every debate about Optimus. Huang: “This is the first robot that really has a chance to achieve the high volume and technology scale necessary to advance technology.” Huang: “Right around the corner. Likely to be the next multi-trillion dollar industry.” The humanoid robot race will not be won in a research lab. It will be won on the manufacturing floor. Every other robotics company on earth can build a robot. Tesla can flood the planet with them. Because Tesla already knows how to stamp metal, build batteries, and deploy autonomous inference at global scale. The rest of the industry has prototypes. Tesla has the most sophisticated manufacturing operation on earth. When the world’s leading chipmaker calls your robot the next multi-trillion dollar industry, the debate is over. One supplies the chips. One builds everything the chips make possible. When that infrastructure scales across Grok, FSD, and Optimus simultaneously, the question stops being whether this changes everything. It becomes how fast.

Dustin

66,374 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk just put a five-year timeline on moving the majority of AI compute off the surface of the Earth. Musk: “5 years from now my prediction is we will launch and be operating every year more AI in space than the cumulative total on Earth.” Not decades from now. Five years. Dwarkesh Patel broke down the math live. 100 gigawatts of AI in orbit requires roughly 10,000 Starship launches per year. One launch every single hour. Musk confirmed it without flinching. The entire operation could run on as few as 20 or 30 physical Starships, each one cycling back to the pad every 30 hours. A fleet smaller than most regional airlines. Deploying more intelligence per year than the entire planet currently runs. Musk: “SpaceX is gearing up to do 10,000 launches a year. And maybe even 20 or 30,000 launches a year.” Every data center under construction right now. Every GPU cluster. Every billion-dollar AI facility going up across three continents. All of it combined would still fall short of what one company plans to put above the atmosphere every year. The reason no one else can follow him here is physics. AI scaling on the ground is already hitting hard ceilings. Grid capacity. Permitting. Cooling. The surface of the planet has a finite budget for how much power you can feed into compute. Space does not. Unobstructed solar at a scale Earth physically cannot provide. Musk: “On Earth you can get to around a terawatt a year of AI in space before you start having fuel supply challenges for the rocket.” A terawatt. That single number exceeds the entire electrical generation capacity of the United States. And the only constraint Musk names is not engineering. Not physics. Not capital. Fuel supply for the rockets. This is why SpaceX and xAI were never two separate visions. The rockets exist to move intelligence off the surface. The AI exists to justify building the rockets. One architecture split across two companies. Every other AI lab on the planet is fighting over the same finite pool of terrestrial power and real estate. Musk is not trying to win that fight. He is leaving the board entirely. Five years from now, the majority of functioning intelligence in the solar system may not be on this planet. It will be above it, running on sunlight, bound by no grid, governed by no jurisdiction. Earth becomes the secondary compute environment in its own solar system.

Elon Musk just put a five-year timeline on moving the majority of AI compute off the surface of the Earth. Musk: “5 years from now my prediction is we will launch and be operating every year more AI in space than the cumulative total on Earth.” Not decades from now. Five years. Dwarkesh Patel broke down the math live. 100 gigawatts of AI in orbit requires roughly 10,000 Starship launches per year. One launch every single hour. Musk confirmed it without flinching. The entire operation could run on as few as 20 or 30 physical Starships, each one cycling back to the pad every 30 hours. A fleet smaller than most regional airlines. Deploying more intelligence per year than the entire planet currently runs. Musk: “SpaceX is gearing up to do 10,000 launches a year. And maybe even 20 or 30,000 launches a year.” Every data center under construction right now. Every GPU cluster. Every billion-dollar AI facility going up across three continents. All of it combined would still fall short of what one company plans to put above the atmosphere every year. The reason no one else can follow him here is physics. AI scaling on the ground is already hitting hard ceilings. Grid capacity. Permitting. Cooling. The surface of the planet has a finite budget for how much power you can feed into compute. Space does not. Unobstructed solar at a scale Earth physically cannot provide. Musk: “On Earth you can get to around a terawatt a year of AI in space before you start having fuel supply challenges for the rocket.” A terawatt. That single number exceeds the entire electrical generation capacity of the United States. And the only constraint Musk names is not engineering. Not physics. Not capital. Fuel supply for the rockets. This is why SpaceX and xAI were never two separate visions. The rockets exist to move intelligence off the surface. The AI exists to justify building the rockets. One architecture split across two companies. Every other AI lab on the planet is fighting over the same finite pool of terrestrial power and real estate. Musk is not trying to win that fight. He is leaving the board entirely. Five years from now, the majority of functioning intelligence in the solar system may not be on this planet. It will be above it, running on sunlight, bound by no grid, governed by no jurisdiction. Earth becomes the secondary compute environment in its own solar system.

Dustin

13,346 views • 4 months ago

This may be the roadmap for every business. One-third reduction they're gonna eat themselves so they're gonna have to find ways to be more productive to absorb that hit. One-third they're gonna push out on price increases, which I agree is inflationary. But here's the big question that's so fascinating, one-third they think they can get back using AI to make their company significantly better at what it does. And I think one of the reasons the market's so optimistic. Certainly when I look at my own small businesses of which I have 54 in our portfolio that are private companies, every single one of them is figuring out some use of a vertical use of AI to reduce their costs. If that ends up being true, Katy bar the doors on the S&P, because not only you have the revenues from tariffs but you've got massive productivity.

This may be the roadmap for every business. One-third reduction they're gonna eat themselves so they're gonna have to find ways to be more productive to absorb that hit. One-third they're gonna push out on price increases, which I agree is inflationary. But here's the big question that's so fascinating, one-third they think they can get back using AI to make their company significantly better at what it does. And I think one of the reasons the market's so optimistic. Certainly when I look at my own small businesses of which I have 54 in our portfolio that are private companies, every single one of them is figuring out some use of a vertical use of AI to reduce their costs. If that ends up being true, Katy bar the doors on the S&P, because not only you have the revenues from tariffs but you've got massive productivity.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

23,059 views • 1 year ago

5 Govt Websites Every Business Owner Must Know 🚀📊 Big business owners will never want you to know about these 5 government websites — because they can literally take your business to the next level 👇 1️⃣ Niryat (DGFT) Get complete export-related information — foreign trade policies, total trade volume, and which region is exporting what. Full breakdown available 🌍📦 2️⃣ ODOP (One District One Product) If your product is locally made, this platform helps you connect at district & national level — and even promotes your product globally 🌐✨ 3️⃣ Indian Trade Portal See which country is importing which product, how much demand exists, and how much supply is already there. Perfect for strategic decisions 📈🌎 4️⃣ TradeStat (Ministry of Commerce) If you want pure data-driven insights, this is a must-visit. You’ll find complete raw export–import data — product-wise, country-wise 🔍📊 5️⃣ IBEF (India Brand Equity Foundation) If you want your “Made in India” product to shine globally, you’ll find branding, awareness, and export-strategy insights here 🇮🇳✨

Mohini Maheshwari

29,143 views • 9 months ago

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THIS $SPX CHART 🚨 The S&P 500 has run the same cycle for 100 years - 25 years bull - 9-12 years bear I know what you're thinking - "we're still in the bull" I've heard this theory before. I just stopped believing it Here's why it doesn't work this time: Every previous bull market was powered by a technology that took DECADES to fully price in Personal computers took 25 years to penetrate every home and business on earth The internet took 25 years to reshape every industry But AI AI took only 2 years Not because it's less powerful - but because it was instantly accessible to everyone on day one No hardware to buy. No infrastructure to build. No learning curve ChatGPT launched and within months every company on earth had already priced in the next decade of AI productivity gains That's never happened before in market history Previous technologies needed time to reach people - and that time was what made bull markets last 25 years AI skipped that entirely The fuel burned in 2 years instead of 25 And when the catalyst is already fully priced in, the market doesn't wait for the calendar It just stops MARK MY WORDS!

🚨 STOP AND LOOK AT THIS $SPX CHART 🚨 The S&P 500 has run the same cycle for 100 years - 25 years bull - 9-12 years bear I know what you're thinking - "we're still in the bull" I've heard this theory before. I just stopped believing it Here's why it doesn't work this time: Every previous bull market was powered by a technology that took DECADES to fully price in Personal computers took 25 years to penetrate every home and business on earth The internet took 25 years to reshape every industry But AI AI took only 2 years Not because it's less powerful - but because it was instantly accessible to everyone on day one No hardware to buy. No infrastructure to build. No learning curve ChatGPT launched and within months every company on earth had already priced in the next decade of AI productivity gains That's never happened before in market history Previous technologies needed time to reach people - and that time was what made bull markets last 25 years AI skipped that entirely The fuel burned in 2 years instead of 25 And when the catalyst is already fully priced in, the market doesn't wait for the calendar It just stops MARK MY WORDS!

bee🐝

12,840 views • 2 months ago