正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

3-Floor RCC Building Load Transfer Visualisation 🏗️ Slab → Beam → Column → Footing → Soil 🔥

Engineering67's profile picture

Engineering Explained

150,880 subscribers

17,943 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

In reinforced concrete structures, the beam–column joint is one of the most critical load transfer zones.
0:37

In reinforced concrete structures, the beam–column joint is one of the most critical load transfer zones.

Architecture Presentation

20,605 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Ark (66, 753 sqm) Will be 3 Times the Size of St Peters Basilica (22,067 sqm). Dedication Day- 29th November 2025 PREPARATION FOR ROOFING RAMPS UP Installation of SHS for steel inclined column Installation of A frames on the 8th floor and main bowl Casting of C30 concrete on 8th floor slab grid line A to A via boom placer Casting of the roof slab with C30 concrete via boom placer. Leveling profile in place to guide the slope. 29 November 2025 is a Reality *More on the Dome of the Ark in our next video. #ChurchGist
11:23

The Ark (66, 753 sqm) Will be 3 Times the Size of St Peters Basilica (22,067 sqm). Dedication Day- 29th November 2025 PREPARATION FOR ROOFING RAMPS UP Installation of SHS for steel inclined column Installation of A frames on the 8th floor and main bowl Casting of C30 concrete on 8th floor slab grid line A to A via boom placer Casting of the roof slab with C30 concrete via boom placer. Leveling profile in place to guide the slope. 29 November 2025 is a Reality *More on the Dome of the Ark in our next video. #ChurchGist

therealchurchgist

20,382 次观看 • 1 年前

BJP leader Nitesh Rane: 🗣️ “Some people are building floor after floor. Wait a little, our Devabhau’s BULLDOZER has gone for OILING."🤣🔥 Within just 3 days, Bandra saw massive demolition of illegal structures. This is governance.💥
0:32

BJP leader Nitesh Rane: 🗣️ “Some people are building floor after floor. Wait a little, our Devabhau’s BULLDOZER has gone for OILING."🤣🔥 Within just 3 days, Bandra saw massive demolition of illegal structures. This is governance.💥

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

132,107 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Optimus Factory at Giga Texas continues to see quick installation and assembly of steel on the growing superstructure, now 8 column grids “long” and nearly as wide as the final perimeter grade beam. GeoPier work on the south end continues as the prerequisite for footing construction. Footings are nearly complete not eh entire north end and on the south end, the foundation is reaching into the newly reclaimed land, which will further lengthen the building, inching closer to the Central Campus Support group of facilities which includes the Battery Cathode, Die Shop and Cortex 2 facilities.
2:53

The Optimus Factory at Giga Texas continues to see quick installation and assembly of steel on the growing superstructure, now 8 column grids “long” and nearly as wide as the final perimeter grade beam. GeoPier work on the south end continues as the prerequisite for footing construction. Footings are nearly complete not eh entire north end and on the south end, the foundation is reaching into the newly reclaimed land, which will further lengthen the building, inching closer to the Central Campus Support group of facilities which includes the Battery Cathode, Die Shop and Cortex 2 facilities.

Joe Tegtmeyer 🚀 🤠🛸😎

50,085 次观看 • 1 个月前

It’s 48 hours to ‘STARTUP VILLAGE NIGERIA 2025’ 🔥 760+ registered 🎟️ 63 Speakers 🗣️ 50 products demo 🏗️ 1 Main Stage & 3 Breakout Rooms 🏟️ You’ll hear from founders building payment solutions, DePIN products, Gaming, DeFI, on Solana from Nigeria 🇳🇬 See you soon!
1:39

It’s 48 hours to ‘STARTUP VILLAGE NIGERIA 2025’ 🔥 760+ registered 🎟️ 63 Speakers 🗣️ 50 products demo 🏗️ 1 Main Stage & 3 Breakout Rooms 🏟️ You’ll hear from founders building payment solutions, DePIN products, Gaming, DeFI, on Solana from Nigeria 🇳🇬 See you soon!

Superteam Nigeria

59,916 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥 HIMARS missiles destroyed the building where the officers of the Vladikavkaz garrison of the 58th Army were stationed This happened 20 km from the contact line, said reserve officer Oleg Marzoev. “Two rockets that hit the building itself pierced the roof and exploded between the first and second floors, completely collapsing them in that part, folding concrete floors. At the same time, after the explosion, one of the missiles, by inertia, pierced another concrete slab into the basement, in the center of the room where three officers were at that moment, and the concrete floor of the basement itself, scattered, cut through the space with fragments of the hull, smashed walls,” — he wrote. According to eyewitnesses cited by Marzoev, as a result of the strike, repeaters were damaged and "wi-fi bridges" were destroyed.
0:45

🔥 HIMARS missiles destroyed the building where the officers of the Vladikavkaz garrison of the 58th Army were stationed This happened 20 km from the contact line, said reserve officer Oleg Marzoev. “Two rockets that hit the building itself pierced the roof and exploded between the first and second floors, completely collapsing them in that part, folding concrete floors. At the same time, after the explosion, one of the missiles, by inertia, pierced another concrete slab into the basement, in the center of the room where three officers were at that moment, and the concrete floor of the basement itself, scattered, cut through the space with fragments of the hull, smashed walls,” — he wrote. According to eyewitnesses cited by Marzoev, as a result of the strike, repeaters were damaged and "wi-fi bridges" were destroyed.

✙ Albina Fella ✙ 🇺🇦🇫🇷🇬🇧🇮🇹🇪🇸🇸🇪🇫🇮

86,777 次观看 • 3 年前

If you’re a smaller guard, one-foot finishes let you get the ball off before the help rotates and before the shot blocker has time to load up. Master these 3 finishes, and you’ll score around length more consistently without having to be the most athletic player on the floor. If you’re serious about becoming a more complete scorer, that’s exactly what I built the 30-Day Solo Hooper Blueprint for. Every workout is already planned out for you with ball handling, finishing, shooting, footwork, and game moves—all inside the app. Comment BLUEPRINT and I’ll send you the program!🏀🔥
0:35

If you’re a smaller guard, one-foot finishes let you get the ball off before the help rotates and before the shot blocker has time to load up. Master these 3 finishes, and you’ll score around length more consistently without having to be the most athletic player on the floor. If you’re serious about becoming a more complete scorer, that’s exactly what I built the 30-Day Solo Hooper Blueprint for. Every workout is already planned out for you with ball handling, finishing, shooting, footwork, and game moves—all inside the app. Comment BLUEPRINT and I’ll send you the program!🏀🔥

GymRat Basketball | Trey Winkler

24,063 次观看 • 1 个月前

A leading gastroenterologist who has sequenced over 4,000 human microbiomes just revealed the three most powerful things she tells patients to do every single day to restore microbial health. Dr. Sabine Hazan’s answer is surprisingly simple — and backed by hard data: 1. Lower stress and release hatred. Her exact words: “The person you think is your enemy is probably lacking microbes — and you likely need some of theirs.” A hug is literally a transfer of resilience-building bacteria. 2. Eat only real, fresh food from sources you trust. Farmers’ markets, local producers, food that hasn’t traveled for weeks. Ultra-processed products are the fastest way to wipe out microbial diversity. 3. Get outside daily — sun, soil, nature, human contact. “Stop being afraid of microbes. Touch the earth, touch people. That’s where life is.” After 4,000+ samples, her lab found detectable Bifidobacterium in fewer than 5% of adults. She calls it a crisis. Her closing line: “Save the Bif.” Watch Dr. Hazan explain it herself — calm, evidence-based, and urgent. Which of these three will you start today?
2:14

A leading gastroenterologist who has sequenced over 4,000 human microbiomes just revealed the three most powerful things she tells patients to do every single day to restore microbial health. Dr. Sabine Hazan’s answer is surprisingly simple — and backed by hard data: 1. Lower stress and release hatred. Her exact words: “The person you think is your enemy is probably lacking microbes — and you likely need some of theirs.” A hug is literally a transfer of resilience-building bacteria. 2. Eat only real, fresh food from sources you trust. Farmers’ markets, local producers, food that hasn’t traveled for weeks. Ultra-processed products are the fastest way to wipe out microbial diversity. 3. Get outside daily — sun, soil, nature, human contact. “Stop being afraid of microbes. Touch the earth, touch people. That’s where life is.” After 4,000+ samples, her lab found detectable Bifidobacterium in fewer than 5% of adults. She calls it a crisis. Her closing line: “Save the Bif.” Watch Dr. Hazan explain it herself — calm, evidence-based, and urgent. Which of these three will you start today?

Camus

352,959 次观看 • 9 个月前

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?
0:22

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

44,559 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥 28 Dead in China's "Shoe Capital" — But Will Beijing Tell You the Real Number? Black smoke swallowed the skyline over Jinjiang, Fujian, just after noon on Thursday. Workers climbed onto the rooftop of a burning shoe factory, waving and screaming for rescue as flames tore through floor after floor below them. Hours later, state media finally put a number on it: 28 dead. The real question is whether anyone outside the Chinese Communist Party will ever know if that number is true. What happened？ Around 12:00 p.m. on July 9, a fire broke out at the Huiteng Shoe Industry Co. factory in Jiangtou Village, Chendai Town — the industrial heart of Jinjiang, a city that brands itself China's "Shoe Capital," home to more than 3,000 footwear manufacturers producing roughly 40% of the country's athletic and casual shoes. Video circulating online, matched against footage reviewed for this report, shows a multi-story factory building fully engulfed, orange flame pouring out of shattered windows and a black column of smoke visible for miles over the surrounding neighborhood of shops and homes. Workers were seen trapped on the roof as the blaze spread beneath them; local reports say some fell while trying to escape. Authorities dispatched 183 firefighters and 35 vehicles, along with a helicopter, to the scene. Fire crews said the stairwells inside the factory were packed with debris and flammable shoemaking materials, which slowed both the escape and the rescue effort. The flames were declared largely extinguished by around 5:40 p.m. — more than five hours after the fire began. The number, and the nine-hour gap For roughly nine hours, official channels described only "significant casualties" — no figure, no breakdown of dead versus injured, no count of how many remained missing. It was not until Thursday evening that Xinhua and other state outlets released a specific toll: 28 dead. No count of the injured or missing has been transparently published alongside it. That gap matters. In a country where the death toll from a workplace disaster can directly affect a local official's career prospects, provincial and municipal officials have a documented incentive to minimize casualty figures before Beijing's own investigators arrive — which is reportedly why a central "joint work group" from the Ministry of Emergency Management was rushed to Jinjiang the same day, effectively taking the count out of local hands. There is also a specific detail from this fire that should raise eyebrows: reports citing local coverage note the factory complex spans more than 60 acres with an annual capacity of roughly 3 million pairs of shoes — yet only 12 workers were registered for industrial injury insurance. An operation of that scale run on a workforce of essentially a dozen "official" employees points to a large, informal labor force that may not appear in any government roster at all. If most of the people inside that building were never on the books to begin with, it becomes far harder — for regulators or for outsiders — to independently verify that 28 is the complete count of who was in the building, and who didn't make it out. A pattern, not a one-off Skepticism toward Chinese disaster tolls isn't cynicism for its own sake — it's a pattern with a paper trail. The 2015 Tianjin warehouse explosions saw the official death toll revised upward repeatedly over several weeks. After catastrophic 2021 flooding hit Zhengzhou, in Henan province, families and independent researchers compiled missing-persons lists far longer than the government's final count, and discussion of the discrepancy was scrubbed from Chinese social media. Coal-mine disasters across China have for decades been documented by labor researchers as chronically undercounted, precisely because local governments control both the rescue effort and the information that comes out of it. None of this proves the Jinjiang toll is wrong. It does mean that "28" is, for now, a number produced entirely by the same authorities who spent nine hours saying nothing at all — with no independent media, no outside investigators, and no free press in China able to check it. Families of the missing, and anyone tracking casualty figures from Jinjiang in the days ahead, would be right to keep watching for whether that number holds. ACI — Aric Chen | Insights
2:35

🔥 28 Dead in China's "Shoe Capital" — But Will Beijing Tell You the Real Number? Black smoke swallowed the skyline over Jinjiang, Fujian, just after noon on Thursday. Workers climbed onto the rooftop of a burning shoe factory, waving and screaming for rescue as flames tore through floor after floor below them. Hours later, state media finally put a number on it: 28 dead. The real question is whether anyone outside the Chinese Communist Party will ever know if that number is true. What happened？ Around 12:00 p.m. on July 9, a fire broke out at the Huiteng Shoe Industry Co. factory in Jiangtou Village, Chendai Town — the industrial heart of Jinjiang, a city that brands itself China's "Shoe Capital," home to more than 3,000 footwear manufacturers producing roughly 40% of the country's athletic and casual shoes. Video circulating online, matched against footage reviewed for this report, shows a multi-story factory building fully engulfed, orange flame pouring out of shattered windows and a black column of smoke visible for miles over the surrounding neighborhood of shops and homes. Workers were seen trapped on the roof as the blaze spread beneath them; local reports say some fell while trying to escape. Authorities dispatched 183 firefighters and 35 vehicles, along with a helicopter, to the scene. Fire crews said the stairwells inside the factory were packed with debris and flammable shoemaking materials, which slowed both the escape and the rescue effort. The flames were declared largely extinguished by around 5:40 p.m. — more than five hours after the fire began. The number, and the nine-hour gap For roughly nine hours, official channels described only "significant casualties" — no figure, no breakdown of dead versus injured, no count of how many remained missing. It was not until Thursday evening that Xinhua and other state outlets released a specific toll: 28 dead. No count of the injured or missing has been transparently published alongside it. That gap matters. In a country where the death toll from a workplace disaster can directly affect a local official's career prospects, provincial and municipal officials have a documented incentive to minimize casualty figures before Beijing's own investigators arrive — which is reportedly why a central "joint work group" from the Ministry of Emergency Management was rushed to Jinjiang the same day, effectively taking the count out of local hands. There is also a specific detail from this fire that should raise eyebrows: reports citing local coverage note the factory complex spans more than 60 acres with an annual capacity of roughly 3 million pairs of shoes — yet only 12 workers were registered for industrial injury insurance. An operation of that scale run on a workforce of essentially a dozen "official" employees points to a large, informal labor force that may not appear in any government roster at all. If most of the people inside that building were never on the books to begin with, it becomes far harder — for regulators or for outsiders — to independently verify that 28 is the complete count of who was in the building, and who didn't make it out. A pattern, not a one-off Skepticism toward Chinese disaster tolls isn't cynicism for its own sake — it's a pattern with a paper trail. The 2015 Tianjin warehouse explosions saw the official death toll revised upward repeatedly over several weeks. After catastrophic 2021 flooding hit Zhengzhou, in Henan province, families and independent researchers compiled missing-persons lists far longer than the government's final count, and discussion of the discrepancy was scrubbed from Chinese social media. Coal-mine disasters across China have for decades been documented by labor researchers as chronically undercounted, precisely because local governments control both the rescue effort and the information that comes out of it. None of this proves the Jinjiang toll is wrong. It does mean that "28" is, for now, a number produced entirely by the same authorities who spent nine hours saying nothing at all — with no independent media, no outside investigators, and no free press in China able to check it. Families of the missing, and anyone tracking casualty figures from Jinjiang in the days ahead, would be right to keep watching for whether that number holds. ACI — Aric Chen | Insights

Aric Chen

48,412 次观看 • 1 个月前

DON'T LET YOUR BITCOIN DIE WITH YOU 💀 ⚰️ Yea look, nobody likes to admit it but we all have to die one day. As I've been talking to people about their self custody lately - both Casa members and not - I hear the same thing over and over. "What happens if I die?" Many people feel pretty good about their bitcoin security for themselves. But their family members often have no idea how to use this stuff. Hardware wallet? Seed phrase stamped on metal? Shamir's secret sharing backups using SD cards, a passphrase, and a treasure hunt through the backyard with a shovel? 😵 We're solving that problem for all Casa members, starting today with Casa Inheritance. A key design principle we kept while building this was to make it as simple as possible for Recipients (your family members that will receive your bitcoin if you pass), while maintaining Casa-level security. An estate transfer is already a stressful time for family, and it can become even more stressful if you add in a crazy treasure hunt to access a fortune in bitcoin. For our basic 3 key vaults, we wanted it to be as easy as using the app. No metal plates, no need to use a hardware wallet, no magic passwords you have to keep track of or else risk messing up the asset transfer. Simplicity is security. So how does it work, in detail? A Vault Owner (Casa member) designates a Recipient (their family or friend) in the Casa app. The Recipient receives an invite to create a free Casa account. The Recipient scans a QR code provided by the Vault Owner, which contains an encrypted version of the owner's mobile key. This encrypted key is only able to be imported by the Recipient's Casa account, and the Recipient can't initially use it or see the vault balance. If the Vault Owner passes away, the Recipient can request access to the vault in their Casa app. This starts a 6 month timer, and sends a ton of notifications every month to the owner. If the owner is still alive, they can reject the request in app. If they are not, the timer will run out. When it does, the Recipient will be able to use the shared mobile key and the request a signature from the Casa Recovery Key for the shared vault. This gives them 2 out of 3 signatures, enough to access the assets. For 5 key vault users, one hardware key is shared with the Recipient. This small increase in friction for Recipients is often worth it for the increased security and resilience of a 5 key vault for larger holdings. To summarize now that you have the details: 1. Share keys and vault access during setup 2. 6 month timelock to ensure no malicious theft 3. Use shared keys and Casa key to access assets Full setup takes less than 5 minutes. Inheritance is one of the biggest problems in self custody today. If you've hodled through years of painful bear markets, you owe it to yourself and your family to not let the reward for that patience go to zero because you didn't have a plan - and we're here to make that easy. Check out the video to see how easy it really is. Like I said earlier this week - Casa is going after major problems in self-custody this year. Check this one off the list ✅. Next one coming sooner than you think 🔥.
1:17

DON'T LET YOUR BITCOIN DIE WITH YOU 💀 ⚰️ Yea look, nobody likes to admit it but we all have to die one day. As I've been talking to people about their self custody lately - both Casa members and not - I hear the same thing over and over. "What happens if I die?" Many people feel pretty good about their bitcoin security for themselves. But their family members often have no idea how to use this stuff. Hardware wallet? Seed phrase stamped on metal? Shamir's secret sharing backups using SD cards, a passphrase, and a treasure hunt through the backyard with a shovel? 😵 We're solving that problem for all Casa members, starting today with Casa Inheritance. A key design principle we kept while building this was to make it as simple as possible for Recipients (your family members that will receive your bitcoin if you pass), while maintaining Casa-level security. An estate transfer is already a stressful time for family, and it can become even more stressful if you add in a crazy treasure hunt to access a fortune in bitcoin. For our basic 3 key vaults, we wanted it to be as easy as using the app. No metal plates, no need to use a hardware wallet, no magic passwords you have to keep track of or else risk messing up the asset transfer. Simplicity is security. So how does it work, in detail? A Vault Owner (Casa member) designates a Recipient (their family or friend) in the Casa app. The Recipient receives an invite to create a free Casa account. The Recipient scans a QR code provided by the Vault Owner, which contains an encrypted version of the owner's mobile key. This encrypted key is only able to be imported by the Recipient's Casa account, and the Recipient can't initially use it or see the vault balance. If the Vault Owner passes away, the Recipient can request access to the vault in their Casa app. This starts a 6 month timer, and sends a ton of notifications every month to the owner. If the owner is still alive, they can reject the request in app. If they are not, the timer will run out. When it does, the Recipient will be able to use the shared mobile key and the request a signature from the Casa Recovery Key for the shared vault. This gives them 2 out of 3 signatures, enough to access the assets. For 5 key vault users, one hardware key is shared with the Recipient. This small increase in friction for Recipients is often worth it for the increased security and resilience of a 5 key vault for larger holdings. To summarize now that you have the details: 1. Share keys and vault access during setup 2. 6 month timelock to ensure no malicious theft 3. Use shared keys and Casa key to access assets Full setup takes less than 5 minutes. Inheritance is one of the biggest problems in self custody today. If you've hodled through years of painful bear markets, you owe it to yourself and your family to not let the reward for that patience go to zero because you didn't have a plan - and we're here to make that easy. Check out the video to see how easy it really is. Like I said earlier this week - Casa is going after major problems in self-custody this year. Check this one off the list ✅. Next one coming sooner than you think 🔥.

Nick Neuman

125,739 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 PART 2 BOMBSHELL: Charlie Kirk SHOT TWICE – From BEHIND by ROOF SNIPER & FRONT by SECURITY "PALM GUN"! Israeli IPs Spiked Searches on EVERYONE Involved MONTHS Before. This is MOSSAD-LEVEL Plot – & That LOW-FLYING SPY PLANE? DRONE DEPLOYMENT CONFIRMED! You watched Part 1 on my channel (link below) where we exposed the Google Trends leaks tying Israel/DC to Charlie's hit. Now, in PART 2 w/ Myself, Israeli News Live AndersM ™️ WeAreNotGoingToMars we GO DEEPER: 🔥 TWO SHOTS, ZERO DOUBT: Eyewitnesses confirm center-mass hit (NOT neck!). Frame-by-frame: Sniper round expands his neck like a tree trunk from BA Building roof (muzzle flash REFLECTS off window – Colin's viral catch!). Seconds later, "palm shooter" (Rick Cutler, ex-Dallas cop w/ ISRAELI NGO TIES: Jews for Jesus, United Hatzalah EMS Army, Operation Underground Railroad COUNTER-INTEL) fires from crowd – recoil in his hand, shirt poofs from impact. Infrared BEAM on Frank Turek's phone PINPOINTS sniper – they DROPPED it post-shot! Operation 322: 3 paths, 2 shooters, 2 distractions. Dan Flood (TPUSA security chief, Israeli connections) signals w/ taps & body shift. Coordinated AF. 🛩️ SUSPICIOUS SPY PLANE: US Army Bombardier Global 6500 (N1098L) flies 204FT over UVU at STALL SPEED (113 knots) – 2x, once pre-hit, once 25min after. Can DEPLOY DRONES. Israeli IP searched tail # Aug 8 (month before kill). Drones spotted in sky – TPUSA's own + unknowns. What were they filming/scanning? 🕵️‍♂️ ISRAELI PRE-PLOT PROOF: Baron Coleman's Trends deep-dive: Israeli/D.C. IPs hunted medical examiner Dedra Amaro (June 30), Timpanogos Hospital (July 16), George Hodgson-Zinn (July 21) – ALL around July 20 (2mo pre-Turning Point USA Student Action Summit where Tucker Carlson was platformed). No autopsies? Cover-up like Steve's father-in-law's homicide (4 examiners faked natural causes – doc confessed fraud under threats). 👥 SECURITY DEEP TIES: Rick Cutler: Israeli "rescue" ops in Guatemala, child trafficking NGO links? Dan Flood: Mossad-adjacent. Grooming witnesses? Phil Lyman pushes "one shot from LC" – goth girls refute: "TWO from behind us!" We retracted a "bullet" (thrown object from crowd – integrity 1st). Suspicious BA guy lingers on stairs post-shot. Need FOOTAGE: Red zone behind tent, roof gaps, security cams under bridge. Send to us/ Candace (Candace Owens) – she's CLOSE (Ep 251 nails 2 shots, give her grace – she's fighting too!). This ain't politics – it's EVIL. Charlie mocked for America First fire? Israel feared Tucker+Charlie exposing AIPAC wars. Team effort: Thousands of hours, crowdfunded truth. No $ grab – I've SPENT more than earned. WATCH FULL PART 2 NOW: [Link to interview – drop in comments!] RT to WAKE THE WORLD. Who's next? 🇺🇸 JUSTICE OR BUST!🔥
2:19:03

🚨 PART 2 BOMBSHELL: Charlie Kirk SHOT TWICE – From BEHIND by ROOF SNIPER & FRONT by SECURITY "PALM GUN"! Israeli IPs Spiked Searches on EVERYONE Involved MONTHS Before. This is MOSSAD-LEVEL Plot – & That LOW-FLYING SPY PLANE? DRONE DEPLOYMENT CONFIRMED! You watched Part 1 on my channel (link below) where we exposed the Google Trends leaks tying Israel/DC to Charlie's hit. Now, in PART 2 w/ Myself, Israeli News Live AndersM ™️ WeAreNotGoingToMars we GO DEEPER: 🔥 TWO SHOTS, ZERO DOUBT: Eyewitnesses confirm center-mass hit (NOT neck!). Frame-by-frame: Sniper round expands his neck like a tree trunk from BA Building roof (muzzle flash REFLECTS off window – Colin's viral catch!). Seconds later, "palm shooter" (Rick Cutler, ex-Dallas cop w/ ISRAELI NGO TIES: Jews for Jesus, United Hatzalah EMS Army, Operation Underground Railroad COUNTER-INTEL) fires from crowd – recoil in his hand, shirt poofs from impact. Infrared BEAM on Frank Turek's phone PINPOINTS sniper – they DROPPED it post-shot! Operation 322: 3 paths, 2 shooters, 2 distractions. Dan Flood (TPUSA security chief, Israeli connections) signals w/ taps & body shift. Coordinated AF. 🛩️ SUSPICIOUS SPY PLANE: US Army Bombardier Global 6500 (N1098L) flies 204FT over UVU at STALL SPEED (113 knots) – 2x, once pre-hit, once 25min after. Can DEPLOY DRONES. Israeli IP searched tail # Aug 8 (month before kill). Drones spotted in sky – TPUSA's own + unknowns. What were they filming/scanning? 🕵️‍♂️ ISRAELI PRE-PLOT PROOF: Baron Coleman's Trends deep-dive: Israeli/D.C. IPs hunted medical examiner Dedra Amaro (June 30), Timpanogos Hospital (July 16), George Hodgson-Zinn (July 21) – ALL around July 20 (2mo pre-Turning Point USA Student Action Summit where Tucker Carlson was platformed). No autopsies? Cover-up like Steve's father-in-law's homicide (4 examiners faked natural causes – doc confessed fraud under threats). 👥 SECURITY DEEP TIES: Rick Cutler: Israeli "rescue" ops in Guatemala, child trafficking NGO links? Dan Flood: Mossad-adjacent. Grooming witnesses? Phil Lyman pushes "one shot from LC" – goth girls refute: "TWO from behind us!" We retracted a "bullet" (thrown object from crowd – integrity 1st). Suspicious BA guy lingers on stairs post-shot. Need FOOTAGE: Red zone behind tent, roof gaps, security cams under bridge. Send to us/ Candace (Candace Owens) – she's CLOSE (Ep 251 nails 2 shots, give her grace – she's fighting too!). This ain't politics – it's EVIL. Charlie mocked for America First fire? Israel feared Tucker+Charlie exposing AIPAC wars. Team effort: Thousands of hours, crowdfunded truth. No $ grab – I've SPENT more than earned. WATCH FULL PART 2 NOW: [Link to interview – drop in comments!] RT to WAKE THE WORLD. Who's next? 🇺🇸 JUSTICE OR BUST!🔥

Project Constitution

131,785 次观看 • 10 个月前

What's next for $SOL? Let me cook. This analysis shows what our AI Trading Assistant does that a normal chart simply can't. 1. The prediction zone Look at the blue band on the right side of the chart. That's the model projecting price forward from the current structure, mapping out a likely range of 76.32 to 78.15 over the next stretch. It sits directly alongside the actual price line, so you can watch the forecast and the reality side by side and judge the model for yourself. 2. The patterns it called The engine scans live and timestamps every signal: Pipe Bottom, 07 Jul 13:59. Flagged the sharp flush before the reversal completed. Three White Soldiers, 08 to 09 Jul. Caught the recovery push as it built. Bullish Engulfing, 11 Jul 06:59. Landed right at the base of the leg that carried SOL back toward 78. Each one is detected as it forms, with a start and end time attached. No hindsight, no redrawing. 3. What the data underneath is saying This is where it gets interesting, and it's simpler than it looks: Sentiment score of 40 (bearish). Selling pressure is present and trend strength is fading. Funding rate is negative (-0.005873), but the long/short ratio is 2.06. Plain English: twice as many traders are betting on a rise, yet the market is charging them to hold that bet. Crowded optimism, weak support. RSI 50.12, ADX 16.75. Both point to a market with no real conviction either way. Momentum is flat. Regime: RANGING, volatility HIGH. Price is stuck in a box, but the box is shaking. 4. What that combination usually means Compressed momentum, crowded positioning and a fresh bullish pattern is a coiled setup. Markets that go quiet while everyone leans one way tend to move sharply once they choose a direction. The tool won't tell you which way to bet. It shows you the tension building so you can size and time accordingly. Best guess: $SOL holds the 76 floor and grinds toward the upper end of that 78 band, with the real move waiting for a volatility break in either direction. Why this matters AI Trading Assistant V2 pulls price action, derivatives data, whale flow, sentiment and news into a single live read, then projects forward from it. That forward projection is the piece nothing else in this space offers. Open AI Hub, load any chart, and see what it flags before the move happens. This isn't financial advice. Always DYOR. →
0:26

What's next for $SOL? Let me cook. This analysis shows what our AI Trading Assistant does that a normal chart simply can't. 1. The prediction zone Look at the blue band on the right side of the chart. That's the model projecting price forward from the current structure, mapping out a likely range of 76.32 to 78.15 over the next stretch. It sits directly alongside the actual price line, so you can watch the forecast and the reality side by side and judge the model for yourself. 2. The patterns it called The engine scans live and timestamps every signal: Pipe Bottom, 07 Jul 13:59. Flagged the sharp flush before the reversal completed. Three White Soldiers, 08 to 09 Jul. Caught the recovery push as it built. Bullish Engulfing, 11 Jul 06:59. Landed right at the base of the leg that carried SOL back toward 78. Each one is detected as it forms, with a start and end time attached. No hindsight, no redrawing. 3. What the data underneath is saying This is where it gets interesting, and it's simpler than it looks: Sentiment score of 40 (bearish). Selling pressure is present and trend strength is fading. Funding rate is negative (-0.005873), but the long/short ratio is 2.06. Plain English: twice as many traders are betting on a rise, yet the market is charging them to hold that bet. Crowded optimism, weak support. RSI 50.12, ADX 16.75. Both point to a market with no real conviction either way. Momentum is flat. Regime: RANGING, volatility HIGH. Price is stuck in a box, but the box is shaking. 4. What that combination usually means Compressed momentum, crowded positioning and a fresh bullish pattern is a coiled setup. Markets that go quiet while everyone leans one way tend to move sharply once they choose a direction. The tool won't tell you which way to bet. It shows you the tension building so you can size and time accordingly. Best guess: $SOL holds the 76 floor and grinds toward the upper end of that 78 band, with the real move waiting for a volatility break in either direction. Why this matters AI Trading Assistant V2 pulls price action, derivatives data, whale flow, sentiment and news into a single live read, then projects forward from it. That forward projection is the piece nothing else in this space offers. Open AI Hub, load any chart, and see what it flags before the move happens. This isn't financial advice. Always DYOR. →

ChainGPT

33,672 次观看 • 1 个月前

My first test with the new Gemini Deep Think 3 🔥🔥🔥 Build a complete Three.js scene in a single HTML file that renders a fully 3D interior room indistinguishable from a classical oil painting hanging in a museum. The Painterly Rendering System Write custom GLSL shaders that replace all standard rendering with oil paint simulation. Every pixel must feel painted by hand. The system needs these layers working together. Brushstroke normals. Generate a procedural brushstroke normal map using layered directional noise at varying scales. Large bold strokes for walls and floors following the plane direction. Small delicate strokes for fine details like metal and glass. Circular strokes for rounded objects. The brushstrokes must catch sidelight and cast tiny shadows into their grooves exactly like real impasto paint on canvas. Paint thickness. Use parallax occlusion mapping to give highlights genuine physical thickness. Where the original painter would load their brush with white or yellow to hit a bright highlight, the paint should visibly sit above the surface. In dark shadow areas, the paint should appear thinner, letting canvas weave show through slightly. Color palette. Restrict the entire scene to a historical oil palette. Titanium white, naples yellow, yellow ochre, raw sienna, burnt sienna, burnt umber, raw umber, ivory black, vermillion used sparingly, and a muted blue-grey. No modern saturated colors. All color mixing should feel subtractive and warm. Edge treatment. No hard edges anywhere in the scene. Object silhouettes must soften and blur slightly as if the painter's brush feathered where one form meets another. Implement this as a screen-space edge-detection pass that blurs based on depth discontinuity and overlays brushstroke texture at boundaries. Canvas texture. The entire final image must have a linen canvas weave overlay rendered with its own normal map that interacts with the scene lighting. As you orbit, the canvas tooth should glint differently. This sells the illusion more than anything else. Varnish layer. Apply a post-processing pass that simulates aged oil varnish. A warm amber tint that is slightly uneven, thicker in corners and thinner in center. A subtle gloss reflection that shifts as you move the camera. Very fine craquelure, hairline crack patterns, visible only when you zoom in close. The Scene. A Dutch Golden Age Study. Model everything procedurally with no external assets. A small intimate room with rough plastered walls in thick paint, warm grey-ochre. A single tall window on the left wall. Leaded glass with thick mullions letting in one dominant shaft of warm light. The window glass should have slight imperfections like bubbles and waviness visible in the paint treatment. A heavy dark wood table positioned center-left. On the table place a brass candlestick with a half-melted candle where the wax drips are modeled and painted with naples yellow impasto highlights. A pewter plate with a half-peeled lemon, the peel curling off the edge of the plate, the exposed fruit flesh a jewel of thick yellow paint catching light. A partially unfolded letter with a broken red wax seal. A small glass of dark wine catching a single highlight. A dark velvet cloth draped from the table edge falling in heavy folds to the floor. The velvet should have that characteristic oil painting treatment where shadows go almost black and the fabric catches light in soft broken highlights. The floor is wide dark wooden planks painted with long horizontal brushstrokes. Against the back wall, barely visible in shadow, a tall wooden cabinet with a few old leather-bound books leaning against each other. A single beam of light from the window cuts diagonally across the scene illuminating floating dust motes painted as soft tiny dots of naples yellow, not CG particles. The rest of the room falls into rich warm shadow. Lighting One dominant directional light from the left simulating window light. Warm, strong, with soft VSM shadows. A very subtle fill from the right in cool blue-grey at perhaps 5% intensity. No ambient light. The shadows should be genuinely dark and warm. This is Vermeer lighting. The contrast between the luminous light-struck areas and the deep velvety shadows is what makes the painting breathe. Post-Processing Chain Render pass. Painterly edge softening pass. Canvas texture overlay pass. Varnish and aging pass. Heavy vignette like a dark gallery frame encroaching. Very subtle bloom only on the brightest impasto highlights. Film grain that mimics canvas tooth texture rather than photographic noise. Interaction OrbitControls with very slow damping at 0.02 and limited orbit range so you can look around the painting but not flip it upside down. Slow zoom. The feeling should be like leaning closer to a painting in a museum and discovering more detail. The Standard When someone opens this file and takes a screenshot, people should genuinely argue whether it is a photograph of a real oil painting or a digital render.
0:36

My first test with the new Gemini Deep Think 3 🔥🔥🔥 Build a complete Three.js scene in a single HTML file that renders a fully 3D interior room indistinguishable from a classical oil painting hanging in a museum. The Painterly Rendering System Write custom GLSL shaders that replace all standard rendering with oil paint simulation. Every pixel must feel painted by hand. The system needs these layers working together. Brushstroke normals. Generate a procedural brushstroke normal map using layered directional noise at varying scales. Large bold strokes for walls and floors following the plane direction. Small delicate strokes for fine details like metal and glass. Circular strokes for rounded objects. The brushstrokes must catch sidelight and cast tiny shadows into their grooves exactly like real impasto paint on canvas. Paint thickness. Use parallax occlusion mapping to give highlights genuine physical thickness. Where the original painter would load their brush with white or yellow to hit a bright highlight, the paint should visibly sit above the surface. In dark shadow areas, the paint should appear thinner, letting canvas weave show through slightly. Color palette. Restrict the entire scene to a historical oil palette. Titanium white, naples yellow, yellow ochre, raw sienna, burnt sienna, burnt umber, raw umber, ivory black, vermillion used sparingly, and a muted blue-grey. No modern saturated colors. All color mixing should feel subtractive and warm. Edge treatment. No hard edges anywhere in the scene. Object silhouettes must soften and blur slightly as if the painter's brush feathered where one form meets another. Implement this as a screen-space edge-detection pass that blurs based on depth discontinuity and overlays brushstroke texture at boundaries. Canvas texture. The entire final image must have a linen canvas weave overlay rendered with its own normal map that interacts with the scene lighting. As you orbit, the canvas tooth should glint differently. This sells the illusion more than anything else. Varnish layer. Apply a post-processing pass that simulates aged oil varnish. A warm amber tint that is slightly uneven, thicker in corners and thinner in center. A subtle gloss reflection that shifts as you move the camera. Very fine craquelure, hairline crack patterns, visible only when you zoom in close. The Scene. A Dutch Golden Age Study. Model everything procedurally with no external assets. A small intimate room with rough plastered walls in thick paint, warm grey-ochre. A single tall window on the left wall. Leaded glass with thick mullions letting in one dominant shaft of warm light. The window glass should have slight imperfections like bubbles and waviness visible in the paint treatment. A heavy dark wood table positioned center-left. On the table place a brass candlestick with a half-melted candle where the wax drips are modeled and painted with naples yellow impasto highlights. A pewter plate with a half-peeled lemon, the peel curling off the edge of the plate, the exposed fruit flesh a jewel of thick yellow paint catching light. A partially unfolded letter with a broken red wax seal. A small glass of dark wine catching a single highlight. A dark velvet cloth draped from the table edge falling in heavy folds to the floor. The velvet should have that characteristic oil painting treatment where shadows go almost black and the fabric catches light in soft broken highlights. The floor is wide dark wooden planks painted with long horizontal brushstrokes. Against the back wall, barely visible in shadow, a tall wooden cabinet with a few old leather-bound books leaning against each other. A single beam of light from the window cuts diagonally across the scene illuminating floating dust motes painted as soft tiny dots of naples yellow, not CG particles. The rest of the room falls into rich warm shadow. Lighting One dominant directional light from the left simulating window light. Warm, strong, with soft VSM shadows. A very subtle fill from the right in cool blue-grey at perhaps 5% intensity. No ambient light. The shadows should be genuinely dark and warm. This is Vermeer lighting. The contrast between the luminous light-struck areas and the deep velvety shadows is what makes the painting breathe. Post-Processing Chain Render pass. Painterly edge softening pass. Canvas texture overlay pass. Varnish and aging pass. Heavy vignette like a dark gallery frame encroaching. Very subtle bloom only on the brightest impasto highlights. Film grain that mimics canvas tooth texture rather than photographic noise. Interaction OrbitControls with very slow damping at 0.02 and limited orbit range so you can look around the painting but not flip it upside down. Slow zoom. The feeling should be like leaning closer to a painting in a museum and discovering more detail. The Standard When someone opens this file and takes a screenshot, people should genuinely argue whether it is a photograph of a real oil painting or a digital render.

Emily

20,940 次观看 • 6 个月前

"India will be invited to join US-led initiative Pax Silica as 'full member' next month"- US embassador Sergio Gor Trying to act smart, Trump? But Bharat under PM .Narendra Modi Ji can see through this 'noble gesture'! Why's US Pushing Bharat into Pax Silica: It's All About American Interests, Not Altruism. Let's cut through diplomatic fluff. US inviting Bharat to join Pax Silica—a coalition for securing supply chains in critical minerals, semiconductors, AI & advanced tech—isn't some benevolent gesture. America doesn't do global alliances without hefty dose of self-interest. Here's real playbook on why Uncle Sam wants us in & crucially, how Bharat must play smart to avoid getting trapped in one-sided deal. 👉US Motives- Securing Dominance, Countering China & Tapping Bharat's Assets 1. Countering China's Monopoly: China controls 90% of global rare earth processing & massive chunk of semiconductor supply chains. Pax Silica is Washington's answer to "de-risk" from Beijing—building a "trusted" network of allies to reroute critical tech flows. Bharat, with world's 3rd-largest rare earth reserves (6.9 million tonnes, mostly in coastal monazite sands), is prime target. US wants access to our raw materials to feed their refineries & fabs, reducing reliance on China without lifting a finger on their own soil. 2. Geopolitical Leverage in Indo-Pacific: Pax Silica pulls Bharat deeper into US orbit as a "strategic counterweight" to China. It's about encircling Beijing economically—Japan, South Korea, UK, Israel are already in; adding Bharat's scale (population, market, geography) makes it powerhouse bloc. Trump-era reciprocity means fair trade on paper, but in reality, it's about locking in allies for tech war. 3. Economic Goldmine-Talent, Market & Cheap Resources: Bharat's engineering prowess, booming digital economy & manufacturing push (via PLI schemes) are irresistible. US sees us as a diversification hub—away from Taiwan's risks—for chips & AI. But dig deeper: Raw rare earths sell for $3,000/tonne, while processed magnets (which we'd import back) go for $25000/tonne. Joining gives US firms access to our resources, talent & $3T+ market, boosting their profits while we play supplier. 4. Tech Sovereignty for US, Not World: This's about controlling "operating system of modern power"—silicon, AI, data centers. By inviting Bharat early, US ensures standards, export controls & investments align with American rules, preventing a multipolar tech world where Bharat could pivot to alternatives. 🔥In short, Pax Silica is economic statecraft: Prosperity for US bloc, dependency for others. It's not charity; it's strategy. 👉How Bharat Must Not Fall into the Trap? JOIN, BUT ON OUR TERMS. Bharat should absolutely join—access to tech, R&D & global chains is a win for our semiconductor ambitions (we're already at <1% global production despite reserves). But NOT Blindly. Here's what Modi Sarkar will demand even as members: —Demand Tech Transfer & Build Domestic Muscle: No deal without enforceable clauses for refining tech & joint fabs in India. —Invest heavily in our own processing plants (e.g., expand IREL's capabilities) to avoid exporting cheap ore & importing pricey chips. –Push for co-ownership in AI/logistics standards—don't let US/Japan hog high-value end. —Maintain Strategic Autonomy by Diversifying Alliances. Will Keep balancing with China (via BRICS/SCO), Russia & EU. Bharat won't burn bridges; but will use Pax Silica to negotiate better terms elsewhere. —Safeguard Data, IP & Sovereignty: Enforce strict data localization in AI deals. Protect our startups from IP theft or forced partnerships. Monitor investments via CFIUS-like screening to block backdoor control. —Focus on Long-Term Resilience: Ramp up R&D funding (aim for 2% GDP), skill 1M+ engineers in semis/AI, & integrate with Quad/iCET for broader gains. IF AMERICA AGREES TO THIS, PAX SILICA IS WELCOME. OR ELSE....THANK YOU, BUT NO THANK YOU!
3:45

"India will be invited to join US-led initiative Pax Silica as 'full member' next month"- US embassador Sergio Gor Trying to act smart, Trump? But Bharat under PM .Narendra Modi Ji can see through this 'noble gesture'! Why's US Pushing Bharat into Pax Silica: It's All About American Interests, Not Altruism. Let's cut through diplomatic fluff. US inviting Bharat to join Pax Silica—a coalition for securing supply chains in critical minerals, semiconductors, AI & advanced tech—isn't some benevolent gesture. America doesn't do global alliances without hefty dose of self-interest. Here's real playbook on why Uncle Sam wants us in & crucially, how Bharat must play smart to avoid getting trapped in one-sided deal. 👉US Motives- Securing Dominance, Countering China & Tapping Bharat's Assets 1. Countering China's Monopoly: China controls 90% of global rare earth processing & massive chunk of semiconductor supply chains. Pax Silica is Washington's answer to "de-risk" from Beijing—building a "trusted" network of allies to reroute critical tech flows. Bharat, with world's 3rd-largest rare earth reserves (6.9 million tonnes, mostly in coastal monazite sands), is prime target. US wants access to our raw materials to feed their refineries & fabs, reducing reliance on China without lifting a finger on their own soil. 2. Geopolitical Leverage in Indo-Pacific: Pax Silica pulls Bharat deeper into US orbit as a "strategic counterweight" to China. It's about encircling Beijing economically—Japan, South Korea, UK, Israel are already in; adding Bharat's scale (population, market, geography) makes it powerhouse bloc. Trump-era reciprocity means fair trade on paper, but in reality, it's about locking in allies for tech war. 3. Economic Goldmine-Talent, Market & Cheap Resources: Bharat's engineering prowess, booming digital economy & manufacturing push (via PLI schemes) are irresistible. US sees us as a diversification hub—away from Taiwan's risks—for chips & AI. But dig deeper: Raw rare earths sell for $3,000/tonne, while processed magnets (which we'd import back) go for $25000/tonne. Joining gives US firms access to our resources, talent & $3T+ market, boosting their profits while we play supplier. 4. Tech Sovereignty for US, Not World: This's about controlling "operating system of modern power"—silicon, AI, data centers. By inviting Bharat early, US ensures standards, export controls & investments align with American rules, preventing a multipolar tech world where Bharat could pivot to alternatives. 🔥In short, Pax Silica is economic statecraft: Prosperity for US bloc, dependency for others. It's not charity; it's strategy. 👉How Bharat Must Not Fall into the Trap? JOIN, BUT ON OUR TERMS. Bharat should absolutely join—access to tech, R&D & global chains is a win for our semiconductor ambitions (we're already at <1% global production despite reserves). But NOT Blindly. Here's what Modi Sarkar will demand even as members: —Demand Tech Transfer & Build Domestic Muscle: No deal without enforceable clauses for refining tech & joint fabs in India. —Invest heavily in our own processing plants (e.g., expand IREL's capabilities) to avoid exporting cheap ore & importing pricey chips. –Push for co-ownership in AI/logistics standards—don't let US/Japan hog high-value end. —Maintain Strategic Autonomy by Diversifying Alliances. Will Keep balancing with China (via BRICS/SCO), Russia & EU. Bharat won't burn bridges; but will use Pax Silica to negotiate better terms elsewhere. —Safeguard Data, IP & Sovereignty: Enforce strict data localization in AI deals. Protect our startups from IP theft or forced partnerships. Monitor investments via CFIUS-like screening to block backdoor control. —Focus on Long-Term Resilience: Ramp up R&D funding (aim for 2% GDP), skill 1M+ engineers in semis/AI, & integrate with Quad/iCET for broader gains. IF AMERICA AGREES TO THIS, PAX SILICA IS WELCOME. OR ELSE....THANK YOU, BUT NO THANK YOU!

BhikuMhatre

60,782 次观看 • 7 个月前

On an average, a household in urban India generates approx. 10 gms. of MLP waste every single day. These are typically the covers of various food products ranging from tetra-pack cartons, masala powder covers, milk powder, potato chips - various other FMCG consumables. MLP (Multi - layered packaging material) are NON recyclable plastic waste. Since it cannot be recycled, this waste has NO purchase value at the scrap shops. Even rag pickers ignore it. Every other waste like thick-thin plastic, paper, metal, electric , electronic etc. have resale value ... But not this bloke. Thus the MLP inevitably ends up on landfills, contaminating the soil and eventually, during flows into a water body on its journey to the ocean. There it hurts the marine life , breaks into micro plastics under the UV light rays from the Sun. In a classical RSVP, it gets into the clouds alongwith evaporated water and returns back to earth in rain water. Through water, all of us and the animals and birds, now have micro plastics in our bodies. Many diseases like cancer, etc have been attributed to this non-organic invader inside our bodies. Now, we cannot wish away the MLPs. They do a fantastic job in keeping the potato chips fresh and crispy for 6 months. A boon to the supply-chain of FMCG products. They are available as a raw material to the food processing. FMCG industries in abundance. Also, an environment friendly commercially viable alternate material in large quantity is not seen in the distant horizon. So, along with 2 other professionals we launched our start-up to address this problem. Ui- Unified Intelligence Pvt Ltd is the execution wing of our venture. Vaspar foundation is our not-for-profit foundation that lodges the innovation center. Here we are always working on developing multiple new products and solutions aimed at creating large scale employment. At the factory MLP waste covers brought in from dry waste collection centres are shredded, washed and then loaded on a sheet making unit that presses out 8'x4' sized sheets of a variety of thickness. As the sheets cool down, we get a light weight thermoset sheet that are extremely strong and have fantastic mechanical and thermal properties. The MLP waste are from food grade plastic and thus have almost zero VOC. Also, the sheets are wonderful heat insulators. We sandwich 3 sheets of these between honeycomb structures made of the same material to create structurally integrated construction grade panels. These 100 mm thick panels are then covered on all sides with 8mm cement boards to form a skin. These are ready to paint surface, are standard construction materials with fire resistance rating of 2 hours. These panels become the walls and roof of our building. The floor is a 6" concrete layer. We build homes, terrace living space, dormitories , class rooms, auditoriums, compound walls, public toilets etc. with these panels. At the rate of 10 grams of MLP packets that we throw out as waste from our homes per day, in a single year each home generates 3,650 grams (10 grams x 365 days) So if an apartment has 10 dwelling units, in a year the residents discharge 36.50 Kgs of MLP waste into the environment Last week we installed this tiny security cabin in our Apartments in Bangalore. There are 10 flats here . This 5'x5'x8' cabin was constructed with our panels in under 6 hours. The weight of the MLP waste consumed in the panels for the cabin is 500kgs. THAT is around 14 years of #MLP waste discharged together by all the VIRGO residents - is now stored in the walls of the cabin as our panels. The cabin has a life of 50 years. We 10 families , in our apartment thus atoned for our 'plastic-guilt' to an extent. For inquiries, E Mail paul@ui.ltd
0:54

On an average, a household in urban India generates approx. 10 gms. of MLP waste every single day. These are typically the covers of various food products ranging from tetra-pack cartons, masala powder covers, milk powder, potato chips - various other FMCG consumables. MLP (Multi - layered packaging material) are NON recyclable plastic waste. Since it cannot be recycled, this waste has NO purchase value at the scrap shops. Even rag pickers ignore it. Every other waste like thick-thin plastic, paper, metal, electric , electronic etc. have resale value ... But not this bloke. Thus the MLP inevitably ends up on landfills, contaminating the soil and eventually, during flows into a water body on its journey to the ocean. There it hurts the marine life , breaks into micro plastics under the UV light rays from the Sun. In a classical RSVP, it gets into the clouds alongwith evaporated water and returns back to earth in rain water. Through water, all of us and the animals and birds, now have micro plastics in our bodies. Many diseases like cancer, etc have been attributed to this non-organic invader inside our bodies. Now, we cannot wish away the MLPs. They do a fantastic job in keeping the potato chips fresh and crispy for 6 months. A boon to the supply-chain of FMCG products. They are available as a raw material to the food processing. FMCG industries in abundance. Also, an environment friendly commercially viable alternate material in large quantity is not seen in the distant horizon. So, along with 2 other professionals we launched our start-up to address this problem. Ui- Unified Intelligence Pvt Ltd is the execution wing of our venture. Vaspar foundation is our not-for-profit foundation that lodges the innovation center. Here we are always working on developing multiple new products and solutions aimed at creating large scale employment. At the factory MLP waste covers brought in from dry waste collection centres are shredded, washed and then loaded on a sheet making unit that presses out 8'x4' sized sheets of a variety of thickness. As the sheets cool down, we get a light weight thermoset sheet that are extremely strong and have fantastic mechanical and thermal properties. The MLP waste are from food grade plastic and thus have almost zero VOC. Also, the sheets are wonderful heat insulators. We sandwich 3 sheets of these between honeycomb structures made of the same material to create structurally integrated construction grade panels. These 100 mm thick panels are then covered on all sides with 8mm cement boards to form a skin. These are ready to paint surface, are standard construction materials with fire resistance rating of 2 hours. These panels become the walls and roof of our building. The floor is a 6" concrete layer. We build homes, terrace living space, dormitories , class rooms, auditoriums, compound walls, public toilets etc. with these panels. At the rate of 10 grams of MLP packets that we throw out as waste from our homes per day, in a single year each home generates 3,650 grams (10 grams x 365 days) So if an apartment has 10 dwelling units, in a year the residents discharge 36.50 Kgs of MLP waste into the environment Last week we installed this tiny security cabin in our Apartments in Bangalore. There are 10 flats here . This 5'x5'x8' cabin was constructed with our panels in under 6 hours. The weight of the MLP waste consumed in the panels for the cabin is 500kgs. THAT is around 14 years of #MLP waste discharged together by all the VIRGO residents - is now stored in the walls of the cabin as our panels. The cabin has a life of 50 years. We 10 families , in our apartment thus atoned for our 'plastic-guilt' to an extent. For inquiries, E Mail [email protected]

Paul Koshy

45,033 次观看 • 1 年前

We're bringing in some fun changes to Dremica this Sunday. Come try it out and see the progress. We can't have a Web3 game without degeneracy. Lokito's gambling antics have inspired a new way to play the game. On Sunday you'll be able to try your luck with your in game gold by spinning Big Boy's Wheel in an attempt to help you top the leaderboards. Also since we've added so much to the game it's time to look at the gameplay loop and its economy. Here's the changes I've proposed and my thoughts. Economic Simplicity We need your in game achievements to feel impactful. Dremica is designed as an MMO to give players freedom of how they play the game. Whether its killing monsters, leveling up tradeskills or playing with their gold. The common denominator for everything is XP (player levels). Even gold can be used to buy XP tomes from the shop to level up your skills. Now I propose we distribute our prize pool to players based on their levels. It's future-proof and allows us to add more features without breaking the core gameplay loops. All players will receive rewards from the SAMA prize pool based on their level obtained. Currently the Carnage prize pool is 100,000 SAMA so EVERY player will get a share of it based on what level they reach during the session. Your level / Total levels from all players * Prize pool = Your rewards. Also to keep that competitive spirit we'll be adding additional prizes for the top 10 on the leaderboard. When the Dremica BETA starts it allows us to simply add in a potential new tokenomic model and also allows PVP to plug into the system with ease. TLDR: More levels = more rewards. Why add in RNG-based mechanics (with the wheel?) Seeing the same people hit top 3 of the leaderboard each week isn't exactly exciting for new players. We can't have a stagnant monotonous grind, we need something dynamic. High-risk/high-reward scenarios change everything. Starting with Big Boy's wheel, we plan more exciting game play options including the new PVP zone in the beta. Personally I can't wait to see someone get super lucky and cause absolute havoc in the community. We're in the Alpha testing phase anyway, let's see how it unfolds. How can you make this sustainable? To make a Web3 game work, it needs to absorb more tokens than what are emitted. Dremica uses a fixed prize pool per session, if we can ensure enough utility that players spend their rewards and more than are emitted it can fund the gaming sessions indefinitely. Next month we're going to be focusing on pushing out the in-game SAMA shop where players can start spending the rewards they earn. It will be the first major step for Dremica to begin adding token utility. Additional utility is planned for the future whether its cosmetic-based rewards or unannounced mechanics. We've held back on planned tokenomic/ecosystem changes to focus on building the game first. If these happen there's only one chance to get it right. I think everyone knows gaming is one of the best use cases of Web3, just need to build a fun experience and keep people engaged. We've got enough time, runway and support to get Dremica up there in the Web3 gaming echelon. What else have you got planned? Each of the past months Dremica has been pushing out some hard-hitting updates and the game is truly taking shape. The team is working tirelessly to keep adding more features and improving the experience. Now that a lot of the core functionality required for an MMORPG is in, we can start to look at expansion. As you'll see later this week we're bringing in other projects/partners to join us on the journey. The Dremica BETA is the next major milestone where the game will look vastly different and the whole world is changing. And hopefully our frens at Beam will be able to assist and make sure everyone knows about it. I originally titled the work on Dremica as the "Secret weapon" before it was announced. Work on "Secret Weapon 2.0" has started which will enhance the Dremica/Carnage experience further. For Dremica to succeed we're doubling down on the "Carnage" model where everyone comes together at the same time to play. This is how the whole Moonsama ecosystem started 3+ years ago. The new Secret Weapon aims to fill that void. How can I play? If you own an EXO join our token-gated community at If you're brand new join and the team/community will be able to help you get access to the game. The next play test is this Sunday February 9th at 4pm UTC. A 2 hour session where you play to get the highest level you can. See you in game 🔥
0:25

We're bringing in some fun changes to Dremica this Sunday. Come try it out and see the progress. We can't have a Web3 game without degeneracy. Lokito's gambling antics have inspired a new way to play the game. On Sunday you'll be able to try your luck with your in game gold by spinning Big Boy's Wheel in an attempt to help you top the leaderboards. Also since we've added so much to the game it's time to look at the gameplay loop and its economy. Here's the changes I've proposed and my thoughts. Economic Simplicity We need your in game achievements to feel impactful. Dremica is designed as an MMO to give players freedom of how they play the game. Whether its killing monsters, leveling up tradeskills or playing with their gold. The common denominator for everything is XP (player levels). Even gold can be used to buy XP tomes from the shop to level up your skills. Now I propose we distribute our prize pool to players based on their levels. It's future-proof and allows us to add more features without breaking the core gameplay loops. All players will receive rewards from the SAMA prize pool based on their level obtained. Currently the Carnage prize pool is 100,000 SAMA so EVERY player will get a share of it based on what level they reach during the session. Your level / Total levels from all players * Prize pool = Your rewards. Also to keep that competitive spirit we'll be adding additional prizes for the top 10 on the leaderboard. When the Dremica BETA starts it allows us to simply add in a potential new tokenomic model and also allows PVP to plug into the system with ease. TLDR: More levels = more rewards. Why add in RNG-based mechanics (with the wheel?) Seeing the same people hit top 3 of the leaderboard each week isn't exactly exciting for new players. We can't have a stagnant monotonous grind, we need something dynamic. High-risk/high-reward scenarios change everything. Starting with Big Boy's wheel, we plan more exciting game play options including the new PVP zone in the beta. Personally I can't wait to see someone get super lucky and cause absolute havoc in the community. We're in the Alpha testing phase anyway, let's see how it unfolds. How can you make this sustainable? To make a Web3 game work, it needs to absorb more tokens than what are emitted. Dremica uses a fixed prize pool per session, if we can ensure enough utility that players spend their rewards and more than are emitted it can fund the gaming sessions indefinitely. Next month we're going to be focusing on pushing out the in-game SAMA shop where players can start spending the rewards they earn. It will be the first major step for Dremica to begin adding token utility. Additional utility is planned for the future whether its cosmetic-based rewards or unannounced mechanics. We've held back on planned tokenomic/ecosystem changes to focus on building the game first. If these happen there's only one chance to get it right. I think everyone knows gaming is one of the best use cases of Web3, just need to build a fun experience and keep people engaged. We've got enough time, runway and support to get Dremica up there in the Web3 gaming echelon. What else have you got planned? Each of the past months Dremica has been pushing out some hard-hitting updates and the game is truly taking shape. The team is working tirelessly to keep adding more features and improving the experience. Now that a lot of the core functionality required for an MMORPG is in, we can start to look at expansion. As you'll see later this week we're bringing in other projects/partners to join us on the journey. The Dremica BETA is the next major milestone where the game will look vastly different and the whole world is changing. And hopefully our frens at Beam will be able to assist and make sure everyone knows about it. I originally titled the work on Dremica as the "Secret weapon" before it was announced. Work on "Secret Weapon 2.0" has started which will enhance the Dremica/Carnage experience further. For Dremica to succeed we're doubling down on the "Carnage" model where everyone comes together at the same time to play. This is how the whole Moonsama ecosystem started 3+ years ago. The new Secret Weapon aims to fill that void. How can I play? If you own an EXO join our token-gated community at If you're brand new join and the team/community will be able to help you get access to the game. The next play test is this Sunday February 9th at 4pm UTC. A 2 hour session where you play to get the highest level you can. See you in game 🔥

Donnie

31,109 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 WARNING: America Is For Sale The EB-5 Visa Is the Pipeline Supercharging Saudi and OIC Influence in Miami How a U.S. investor-visa program gives foreign Islamic power brokers a direct path into America’s institutions — and why conservatives are sounding the alarm. The moment you understand what is happening in Miami — the expansion of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), the kingdom’s aggressive acquisition strategy, and the political machinery of the OIC — the EB-5 “Investor Visa” program becomes the final and most dangerous piece of the pipeline. ⚡ Quick Explainer: What Is the OIC? The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is a 57-state Islamic intergovernmental bloc — the second-largest organization in the world after the UN. Saudi Arabia sits at its center. The OIC acts as the collective political arm of the Islamic world, using its unified voting bloc to: drive UN resolutions push global “Islamophobia” standards pressure Western governments export Islamic-aligned legal and cultural norms PIF is the financial engine. The OIC is the political engine. Together they form a coordinated influence strategy. ⚠️ 1. EB-5 Turns U.S. Residency Into a Commodity for Foreign Powers Saudi Arabia and OIC-aligned states don’t immigrate — they invest. EB-5 was built for wealthy foreign nationals, including: state-linked businessmen sovereign fund executives politically connected elites Through EB-5, they can: buy into U.S. real estate obtain permanent residency embed financial networks influence political structures secure long-term footholds All without assimilating or aligning with American interests. This is why conservatives call EB-5: “A citizenship-for-sale program that invites foreign strategic penetration.” ⚠️ 2. EB-5 Is Used by High-Risk Foreign Nationals DHS, FBI, and Senate investigations have repeatedly documented EB-5 applicants from: China (including CCP-linked elites) Gulf monarchies Pakistan Turkey Qatar Saudi Arabia Many are tied directly or indirectly to: state ministries royal families (HELLO SAUDI ARABIA) sovereign funds intelligence-linked networks EB-5 is exactly the type of gateway Saudi Arabia would exploit to plant long-term influence inside America — including Miami. ⚠️ 3. Miami Is One of the Biggest EB-5 Hubs in America Miami real estate has relied on foreign capital for more than a decade, and EB-5 money has flowed into its largest developments. Combine that with: Saudi Arabia building a PIF command center in Miami direct PIF investment offices Saudi-funded conferences new Miami–Riyadh flight routes Miami being positioned as the Saudi hub for Latin America Add EB-5, and Miami becomes: a turnkey gateway for Saudi and OIC-aligned elites to embed themselves permanently into Florida’s political and economic system. This is exactly what conservatives have been warning about. ⚠️ 4. EB-5 Has a Long, Documented History of Fraud and Manipulation Federal investigations have repeatedly confirmed EB-5’s vulnerabilities: Funds diverted for political influence money laundering stolen investor capital fake job-creation claims compromised “regional centers” foreign intelligence-linked applicants Miami’s real-estate market — already a magnet for foreign capital — becomes exponentially more dangerous when combined with: PIF money Saudi strategic interests OIC ideological goals political cheerleaders like Mayor Francis Suarez This is why conservatives view EB-5 as a national security threat, not an economic tool. ⚠️ 5. EB-5 Is the Perfect Vehicle for “Soft Conquest” Saudi Arabia openly describes its strategy: “We are not just investing in things — we are investing in industries.” Industries → systems → influence → power. EB-5 aligns perfectly with that model: embeds foreign Islamic influence on U.S. soil creates permanent legal residency buys political and commercial access builds local economic dependency normalizes long-term foreign presence in American communities From the conservative perspective, this is how a foreign state captures a city without firing a shot. 🔥 BOTTOM LINE Now that Saudi Arabia’s PIF is openly establishing Miami as its American gateway, the EB-5 investor-visa program becomes the most dangerous loophole of all - a direct pipeline for OIC-aligned foreign elites to purchase residency, real estate, influence, and long-term power inside Florida. WHY IS THIS ALLOWED - WHY ARE WE HELPING OUR ENEMIES CONQUER US?
0:44

🚨 WARNING: America Is For Sale The EB-5 Visa Is the Pipeline Supercharging Saudi and OIC Influence in Miami How a U.S. investor-visa program gives foreign Islamic power brokers a direct path into America’s institutions — and why conservatives are sounding the alarm. The moment you understand what is happening in Miami — the expansion of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), the kingdom’s aggressive acquisition strategy, and the political machinery of the OIC — the EB-5 “Investor Visa” program becomes the final and most dangerous piece of the pipeline. ⚡ Quick Explainer: What Is the OIC? The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is a 57-state Islamic intergovernmental bloc — the second-largest organization in the world after the UN. Saudi Arabia sits at its center. The OIC acts as the collective political arm of the Islamic world, using its unified voting bloc to: drive UN resolutions push global “Islamophobia” standards pressure Western governments export Islamic-aligned legal and cultural norms PIF is the financial engine. The OIC is the political engine. Together they form a coordinated influence strategy. ⚠️ 1. EB-5 Turns U.S. Residency Into a Commodity for Foreign Powers Saudi Arabia and OIC-aligned states don’t immigrate — they invest. EB-5 was built for wealthy foreign nationals, including: state-linked businessmen sovereign fund executives politically connected elites Through EB-5, they can: buy into U.S. real estate obtain permanent residency embed financial networks influence political structures secure long-term footholds All without assimilating or aligning with American interests. This is why conservatives call EB-5: “A citizenship-for-sale program that invites foreign strategic penetration.” ⚠️ 2. EB-5 Is Used by High-Risk Foreign Nationals DHS, FBI, and Senate investigations have repeatedly documented EB-5 applicants from: China (including CCP-linked elites) Gulf monarchies Pakistan Turkey Qatar Saudi Arabia Many are tied directly or indirectly to: state ministries royal families (HELLO SAUDI ARABIA) sovereign funds intelligence-linked networks EB-5 is exactly the type of gateway Saudi Arabia would exploit to plant long-term influence inside America — including Miami. ⚠️ 3. Miami Is One of the Biggest EB-5 Hubs in America Miami real estate has relied on foreign capital for more than a decade, and EB-5 money has flowed into its largest developments. Combine that with: Saudi Arabia building a PIF command center in Miami direct PIF investment offices Saudi-funded conferences new Miami–Riyadh flight routes Miami being positioned as the Saudi hub for Latin America Add EB-5, and Miami becomes: a turnkey gateway for Saudi and OIC-aligned elites to embed themselves permanently into Florida’s political and economic system. This is exactly what conservatives have been warning about. ⚠️ 4. EB-5 Has a Long, Documented History of Fraud and Manipulation Federal investigations have repeatedly confirmed EB-5’s vulnerabilities: Funds diverted for political influence money laundering stolen investor capital fake job-creation claims compromised “regional centers” foreign intelligence-linked applicants Miami’s real-estate market — already a magnet for foreign capital — becomes exponentially more dangerous when combined with: PIF money Saudi strategic interests OIC ideological goals political cheerleaders like Mayor Francis Suarez This is why conservatives view EB-5 as a national security threat, not an economic tool. ⚠️ 5. EB-5 Is the Perfect Vehicle for “Soft Conquest” Saudi Arabia openly describes its strategy: “We are not just investing in things — we are investing in industries.” Industries → systems → influence → power. EB-5 aligns perfectly with that model: embeds foreign Islamic influence on U.S. soil creates permanent legal residency buys political and commercial access builds local economic dependency normalizes long-term foreign presence in American communities From the conservative perspective, this is how a foreign state captures a city without firing a shot. 🔥 BOTTOM LINE Now that Saudi Arabia’s PIF is openly establishing Miami as its American gateway, the EB-5 investor-visa program becomes the most dangerous loophole of all - a direct pipeline for OIC-aligned foreign elites to purchase residency, real estate, influence, and long-term power inside Florida. WHY IS THIS ALLOWED - WHY ARE WE HELPING OUR ENEMIES CONQUER US?

Amy Mek

76,991 次观看 • 9 个月前

Like seemingly everyone on this app I have plenty of opinions about Twitter > X and figure now is a good time to open up a bit about my experience at the company. I tweeted for years into the void for the love of it like many of you, but after selling my startup to Twitter in 2020 I finally got to see it from the inside. Up close it was both amazing and terrible, like so many other companies and things in life. As someone with a maniacal sense of urgency built into me, Twitter often felt siloed and bureaucratic. Dumb power plays, reorgs and team name changes for the sake of someone’s ego were distractions that occurred too regularly. You couldn’t just be a builder — you also needed to be a politician. I was shocked by how old and bespoke the infrastructure was, but there was little will to think beyond quarterly earnings calls because we were all beholden to the masters of mDAU and revenue growth as a public company. It often felt like things were held together with duct tape and glue, and that many people had just accepted that a small product change could take months or quarters to build. Management had become bloated to accommodate career growth and the company culture felt too soft and entitled for my own taste. Healthy debate and criticism was replaced by a default refrain of “no, that can’t be done” or “another team owns that so don’t touch it”. Teams could spend months building a feature and then some last-minute kerfuffle meant it’d get killed for being too risky. Just talking directly to customers could turn into a turf war and create deadlocks between functions. I recall one such episode where a teammate spent a month trying to get clearance to reach out to some creators. He went through 3 layers of management and 6 different functional teams. In the end 4 executives were involved in the approval. It was insanity, and unfortunately I saw several top performers get burnt out and demoralized after exhausting experiences like that. Most people were good at their jobs but it was nearly impossible to fire poor performers — instead they got shuffled around to other teams because few managers had the will or resources to figure out how to get them out. A high performance culture pulls everyone up, but the opposite weighs everyone down. Twitter often felt like a place that kept squandering its own potential, which was sad and frustrating to see. The person who was best at cutting through the BS and inspiring a vision during my tenure was Kayvon Beykpour, but he wasn’t fully empowered to run the company since he wasn’t the CEO. Despite those real issues, I was lucky enough to work with some of the most talented people in the business at Twitter in product, design, engineering, research, legal, BD, trust & safety, marketing, PR and more. Often it was a small cross-functional team of intrinsically motivated people who made the biggest impact by challenging some core assumption. Those teams were very fun to be on but they felt like the exception rather than the rule. The months of waiting for the deal to close in 2022 were particularly slow and painful; it felt like leadership hid behind lawyers and legal language as all answers about the company’s future notoriously included the phrase “fiduciary duty”. Colleagues openly talked about how Twitter was being sold because leadership didn’t have conviction in their own plan or ability to fix longstanding problems. Although I didn’t know much about Elon I was cautiously optimistic – I saw him as the guy who built incredible and enduring companies like Tesla and SpaceX, so perhaps his private ownership could shake things up and breathe new life into the company. My take on what’s happened since then is full of lived nuance. When people ask why I stayed it’s easy to answer: optimism, curiosity, personal growth and money. From the beginning I saw that some changes Elon was going to make were smart and others were stupid, but when I’m on a team I uphold the philosophy of “praise in public and criticize in private”. I was far from a silent wallflower. I shared my opinions openly and pushed back often, both before and after the acquisition. I made peace with the fact that I didn’t have psychological safety at Twitter 2.0 and that meant I could be fired at any moment, and for no reason at all. I watched it happen repeatedly and saw how negatively it impacted team morale. Although I couldn’t change the situation I did my best to shine a light on folks who were doing important work while being an emotionally supportive leader for those who were struggling to adapt to the more brutalist and hardcore culture. In person Elon is oddly charming and he’s genuinely funny. He also has personality quirks like telling the same stories and jokes over and over. The challenge is his personality and demeanor can turn on a dime going from excited to angry. Since it was hard to read what mood he might be in and what his reaction would be to any given thing, people quickly became afraid of being called into meetings or having to share negative news with him. At times it felt like the inner circle was too zealous and fanatical in their unwavering support of everything he said. When individuals encouraged me to be careful about what I said I politely thanked them and said I would not be taking their advice. I had no interest in adding to a culture of fear or walking on eggshells around Elon. Either he would respect me for being real or he could fire me. Either outcome was okay. I quickly learned that product and business decisions were nearly always the result of him following his gut instinct, and he didn’t seem compelled to seek out or rely on a lot of data or expertise to inform it. That was particularly frustrating for me since I believed I had useful institutional knowledge that could help him make better decisions. Instead he'd poll Twitter, ask a friend, or even ask his biographer for product advice. At times it seemed he trusted random feedback more than the people in the room who spent their lives dedicated to tackling the problem at hand. I never figured out why and remain puzzled by it. I don’t think things had to be as difficult or dramatic as they turned out to be but I can’t say I’d bet against Elon or count him out. He’s smart and has enough money to make a lot of mistakes and then course correct when things go awry. As the largest shareholder he can tank the value in the short-term, but eventually he’ll need things to turn around. His focus on speed is incredible and he’s obviously not afraid of blowing things up, but now the real measure will be how it get reconstructed and if enough people want the new everything app he is building. I learned a ton from watching Elon up close – the good, the bad and the ugly. His boldness, passion and storytelling is inspiring, but his lack of process and empathy is painful. Elon has an exceptional talent for tackling hard physics-based problems but products that facilitate human connection and communication require a different type of social-emotional intelligence. Social networks are hard to kill but they’re not immune from death spirals. Only time will tell what the outcome will be but I hope X finds its footing because competition is good for consumers. In the meantime, I have a lot of empathy for the employees who are working tirelessly behind the scenes, the advertisers who want a stable platform to sell their stuff on, and the customers who are experiencing chaotic updates. It’s been a madhouse. Twitter moved at the speed of molasses and suffered from bureaucracy but now X is run by a mercurial leader whose instinct is driven by the unique and undoubtedly weird experience of being the biggest voice on the platform. Many of you know me from the sleeping bag incident where I slept on a conference room floor, so I figure, let’s talk about that too. Going viral was an odd and interesting experience. I was attacked by people on the left and called a billionaire bootlicker, while simultaneously being attacked by people on the right for being a working mom who was demonized as an example of a woman choosing her career over her family. Thankfully I can laugh at myself and I don’t take armchair keyboard ideologues too seriously. Being the main character on the timeline, even for a few minutes, requires a thick skin and a strong sense of self. The real story is pretty simple. I was given a nearly impossible deadline for his first project and as the product lead I would never ask anyone to do anything I wasn’t willing to do myself. So I worked round the clock alongside an amazing team spanning many timezones, and we delivered it on schedule – truly against the odds. It was intense but also fun. Those first few months were wildly crazy but I wanted to be there and I have no regrets. Showing up and giving it your all should, in most cases, be celebrated. Obviously you can’t work at that pace forever but there are moments where bursts are mission critical. I’ve pulled many all-nighters in my career and also when I was a student for something that mattered to me. I don’t regret putting in long hours or being ambitious, and feel proud of how far I’ve come from where I started thanks in part to that type of work ethic. I think of life as a game, and being at Twitter after the acquisition was like playing life at Level 10 on Hard Mode. Since I like taking on difficult challenges I found it interesting and rewarding because I was growing and learning so rapidly. I realize our society today trends toward polarization but when it comes to this app, its owner, and its future, I am neither a fangirl nor a hater — I’m an optimistic pragmatist. This may really irritate the internet but you cannot pigeonhole me into some radical position of either loving or hating every change that’s occurred. I escaped my fundamentalist upbringing and am a free thinker these days. Everyone can be seen as both a hero or a villain, depending on who is telling what angle of the story. Elon doesn’t deserve to be venerated or vilified. He’s a complicated person with an unfathomable amount of financial and geopolitical power which is why humanity needs him to err on the side of goodness, rather than political divisiveness and pettiness. I disagree with many of his decisions and am surprised by his willingness to burn so much down, but with enough money and time, something new & innovative may emerge. I hope it does. Sometimes I get asked about how I felt when I got laid off, and the truth is it was the best gift I’ve ever received. Sure the headlines and punchlines wrote themselves but I was battle hardened by then. I knew that I’d worked in a way where I could walk out with my head held high. I have no bitterness about the Product Management team being dismantled, and it made sense for me to exit as nearly all of the remaining PMs were let go. Going on a sabbatical afterward has been exactly what I needed to decompress and I’m finally feeling rested and relaxed. I’m a creative and a builder, so sooner than later I’ll jump back into a high intensity company but I’m grateful for this season of thinking, reading, traveling and being with people I love. After having time to reflect I believe more than ever that the very best outcomes flow from great leadership that combines the head and the heart. I’d be remiss if I didn’t note that in all of this there is also a cautionary tale for anyone who succeeds at something — which is that the higher you climb, the smaller your world becomes. It’s a strange paradox but the richest and most powerful people are also some of the most isolated. I found myself frequently looking at Elon and seeing a person who seemed quite alone because his time and energy was so purely devoted to work, which is not the model of a life I want to live. Money and fame can create psychological prisons which may worsen mental health conditions. We’ve all seen high profile cases of celebrities who end up with some combination of depression, paranoia, delusions of grandeur, mania and/or erratic behavior. Living in an echo chamber is dangerous and being at the top makes a person even more susceptible to being surrounded by yes people when nearly everyone around you is on the payroll and somehow stands to benefit from being in your orbit. Figuring out how to keep “better angels” around in the form of family, friends, and teammates is critical to staying on the rails and enduring intense ups and downs. Everyone needs to hear hard truths sometimes and if you fire all the people who speak up then the reality distortion field may just turn into a vortex. I was drawn to Twitter because I’m obsessed with the problem of loneliness and connection between people. I find it fascinating & troubling that humans are getting lonelier as we simultaneously create a world that’s both safer and wealthier. I don’t believe that trade-off has to exist, which is why I keep returning to that theme in my personal and professional life. I realize this is too long of a tweet but Twitter was a weird and special place on the internet, and I’m grateful to have played a teeny tiny role in its story and evolution. I’m here for whatever comes next — on this app and in new places. Consumer social is very much alive and at a fascinating juncture, so I’ll be watching and participating and sharing hot takes because I don’t want to, and probably can’t, turn that part of me off. Perhaps X becomes a resounding success. Or it fails epically. Either way, I expect it will continue to be a very entertaining ride. 🫡
14:49

Like seemingly everyone on this app I have plenty of opinions about Twitter > X and figure now is a good time to open up a bit about my experience at the company. I tweeted for years into the void for the love of it like many of you, but after selling my startup to Twitter in 2020 I finally got to see it from the inside. Up close it was both amazing and terrible, like so many other companies and things in life. As someone with a maniacal sense of urgency built into me, Twitter often felt siloed and bureaucratic. Dumb power plays, reorgs and team name changes for the sake of someone’s ego were distractions that occurred too regularly. You couldn’t just be a builder — you also needed to be a politician. I was shocked by how old and bespoke the infrastructure was, but there was little will to think beyond quarterly earnings calls because we were all beholden to the masters of mDAU and revenue growth as a public company. It often felt like things were held together with duct tape and glue, and that many people had just accepted that a small product change could take months or quarters to build. Management had become bloated to accommodate career growth and the company culture felt too soft and entitled for my own taste. Healthy debate and criticism was replaced by a default refrain of “no, that can’t be done” or “another team owns that so don’t touch it”. Teams could spend months building a feature and then some last-minute kerfuffle meant it’d get killed for being too risky. Just talking directly to customers could turn into a turf war and create deadlocks between functions. I recall one such episode where a teammate spent a month trying to get clearance to reach out to some creators. He went through 3 layers of management and 6 different functional teams. In the end 4 executives were involved in the approval. It was insanity, and unfortunately I saw several top performers get burnt out and demoralized after exhausting experiences like that. Most people were good at their jobs but it was nearly impossible to fire poor performers — instead they got shuffled around to other teams because few managers had the will or resources to figure out how to get them out. A high performance culture pulls everyone up, but the opposite weighs everyone down. Twitter often felt like a place that kept squandering its own potential, which was sad and frustrating to see. The person who was best at cutting through the BS and inspiring a vision during my tenure was Kayvon Beykpour, but he wasn’t fully empowered to run the company since he wasn’t the CEO. Despite those real issues, I was lucky enough to work with some of the most talented people in the business at Twitter in product, design, engineering, research, legal, BD, trust & safety, marketing, PR and more. Often it was a small cross-functional team of intrinsically motivated people who made the biggest impact by challenging some core assumption. Those teams were very fun to be on but they felt like the exception rather than the rule. The months of waiting for the deal to close in 2022 were particularly slow and painful; it felt like leadership hid behind lawyers and legal language as all answers about the company’s future notoriously included the phrase “fiduciary duty”. Colleagues openly talked about how Twitter was being sold because leadership didn’t have conviction in their own plan or ability to fix longstanding problems. Although I didn’t know much about Elon I was cautiously optimistic – I saw him as the guy who built incredible and enduring companies like Tesla and SpaceX, so perhaps his private ownership could shake things up and breathe new life into the company. My take on what’s happened since then is full of lived nuance. When people ask why I stayed it’s easy to answer: optimism, curiosity, personal growth and money. From the beginning I saw that some changes Elon was going to make were smart and others were stupid, but when I’m on a team I uphold the philosophy of “praise in public and criticize in private”. I was far from a silent wallflower. I shared my opinions openly and pushed back often, both before and after the acquisition. I made peace with the fact that I didn’t have psychological safety at Twitter 2.0 and that meant I could be fired at any moment, and for no reason at all. I watched it happen repeatedly and saw how negatively it impacted team morale. Although I couldn’t change the situation I did my best to shine a light on folks who were doing important work while being an emotionally supportive leader for those who were struggling to adapt to the more brutalist and hardcore culture. In person Elon is oddly charming and he’s genuinely funny. He also has personality quirks like telling the same stories and jokes over and over. The challenge is his personality and demeanor can turn on a dime going from excited to angry. Since it was hard to read what mood he might be in and what his reaction would be to any given thing, people quickly became afraid of being called into meetings or having to share negative news with him. At times it felt like the inner circle was too zealous and fanatical in their unwavering support of everything he said. When individuals encouraged me to be careful about what I said I politely thanked them and said I would not be taking their advice. I had no interest in adding to a culture of fear or walking on eggshells around Elon. Either he would respect me for being real or he could fire me. Either outcome was okay. I quickly learned that product and business decisions were nearly always the result of him following his gut instinct, and he didn’t seem compelled to seek out or rely on a lot of data or expertise to inform it. That was particularly frustrating for me since I believed I had useful institutional knowledge that could help him make better decisions. Instead he'd poll Twitter, ask a friend, or even ask his biographer for product advice. At times it seemed he trusted random feedback more than the people in the room who spent their lives dedicated to tackling the problem at hand. I never figured out why and remain puzzled by it. I don’t think things had to be as difficult or dramatic as they turned out to be but I can’t say I’d bet against Elon or count him out. He’s smart and has enough money to make a lot of mistakes and then course correct when things go awry. As the largest shareholder he can tank the value in the short-term, but eventually he’ll need things to turn around. His focus on speed is incredible and he’s obviously not afraid of blowing things up, but now the real measure will be how it get reconstructed and if enough people want the new everything app he is building. I learned a ton from watching Elon up close – the good, the bad and the ugly. His boldness, passion and storytelling is inspiring, but his lack of process and empathy is painful. Elon has an exceptional talent for tackling hard physics-based problems but products that facilitate human connection and communication require a different type of social-emotional intelligence. Social networks are hard to kill but they’re not immune from death spirals. Only time will tell what the outcome will be but I hope X finds its footing because competition is good for consumers. In the meantime, I have a lot of empathy for the employees who are working tirelessly behind the scenes, the advertisers who want a stable platform to sell their stuff on, and the customers who are experiencing chaotic updates. It’s been a madhouse. Twitter moved at the speed of molasses and suffered from bureaucracy but now X is run by a mercurial leader whose instinct is driven by the unique and undoubtedly weird experience of being the biggest voice on the platform. Many of you know me from the sleeping bag incident where I slept on a conference room floor, so I figure, let’s talk about that too. Going viral was an odd and interesting experience. I was attacked by people on the left and called a billionaire bootlicker, while simultaneously being attacked by people on the right for being a working mom who was demonized as an example of a woman choosing her career over her family. Thankfully I can laugh at myself and I don’t take armchair keyboard ideologues too seriously. Being the main character on the timeline, even for a few minutes, requires a thick skin and a strong sense of self. The real story is pretty simple. I was given a nearly impossible deadline for his first project and as the product lead I would never ask anyone to do anything I wasn’t willing to do myself. So I worked round the clock alongside an amazing team spanning many timezones, and we delivered it on schedule – truly against the odds. It was intense but also fun. Those first few months were wildly crazy but I wanted to be there and I have no regrets. Showing up and giving it your all should, in most cases, be celebrated. Obviously you can’t work at that pace forever but there are moments where bursts are mission critical. I’ve pulled many all-nighters in my career and also when I was a student for something that mattered to me. I don’t regret putting in long hours or being ambitious, and feel proud of how far I’ve come from where I started thanks in part to that type of work ethic. I think of life as a game, and being at Twitter after the acquisition was like playing life at Level 10 on Hard Mode. Since I like taking on difficult challenges I found it interesting and rewarding because I was growing and learning so rapidly. I realize our society today trends toward polarization but when it comes to this app, its owner, and its future, I am neither a fangirl nor a hater — I’m an optimistic pragmatist. This may really irritate the internet but you cannot pigeonhole me into some radical position of either loving or hating every change that’s occurred. I escaped my fundamentalist upbringing and am a free thinker these days. Everyone can be seen as both a hero or a villain, depending on who is telling what angle of the story. Elon doesn’t deserve to be venerated or vilified. He’s a complicated person with an unfathomable amount of financial and geopolitical power which is why humanity needs him to err on the side of goodness, rather than political divisiveness and pettiness. I disagree with many of his decisions and am surprised by his willingness to burn so much down, but with enough money and time, something new & innovative may emerge. I hope it does. Sometimes I get asked about how I felt when I got laid off, and the truth is it was the best gift I’ve ever received. Sure the headlines and punchlines wrote themselves but I was battle hardened by then. I knew that I’d worked in a way where I could walk out with my head held high. I have no bitterness about the Product Management team being dismantled, and it made sense for me to exit as nearly all of the remaining PMs were let go. Going on a sabbatical afterward has been exactly what I needed to decompress and I’m finally feeling rested and relaxed. I’m a creative and a builder, so sooner than later I’ll jump back into a high intensity company but I’m grateful for this season of thinking, reading, traveling and being with people I love. After having time to reflect I believe more than ever that the very best outcomes flow from great leadership that combines the head and the heart. I’d be remiss if I didn’t note that in all of this there is also a cautionary tale for anyone who succeeds at something — which is that the higher you climb, the smaller your world becomes. It’s a strange paradox but the richest and most powerful people are also some of the most isolated. I found myself frequently looking at Elon and seeing a person who seemed quite alone because his time and energy was so purely devoted to work, which is not the model of a life I want to live. Money and fame can create psychological prisons which may worsen mental health conditions. We’ve all seen high profile cases of celebrities who end up with some combination of depression, paranoia, delusions of grandeur, mania and/or erratic behavior. Living in an echo chamber is dangerous and being at the top makes a person even more susceptible to being surrounded by yes people when nearly everyone around you is on the payroll and somehow stands to benefit from being in your orbit. Figuring out how to keep “better angels” around in the form of family, friends, and teammates is critical to staying on the rails and enduring intense ups and downs. Everyone needs to hear hard truths sometimes and if you fire all the people who speak up then the reality distortion field may just turn into a vortex. I was drawn to Twitter because I’m obsessed with the problem of loneliness and connection between people. I find it fascinating & troubling that humans are getting lonelier as we simultaneously create a world that’s both safer and wealthier. I don’t believe that trade-off has to exist, which is why I keep returning to that theme in my personal and professional life. I realize this is too long of a tweet but Twitter was a weird and special place on the internet, and I’m grateful to have played a teeny tiny role in its story and evolution. I’m here for whatever comes next — on this app and in new places. Consumer social is very much alive and at a fascinating juncture, so I’ll be watching and participating and sharing hot takes because I don’t want to, and probably can’t, turn that part of me off. Perhaps X becomes a resounding success. Or it fails epically. Either way, I expect it will continue to be a very entertaining ride. 🫡

Esther Crawford ✨

5,501,971 次观看 • 3 年前