Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨3I/ATLAS: The Problem With Declaring "Nothing There" After Five Hours A recent report from the SETI community, specifically the Breakthrough Listen initiative, announced that a five hour radio scan of 3I/ATLAS detected no signals indicative of extraterrestrial technology. In much of mainstream astronomy coverage, that conclusion was framed as...

39,070 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 3I/ATLAS: The Visitor No One Knows How to Explain Avi Loeb just revealed details that NASA didn’t… and they’re hard to ignore. Everyone has been talking about 3I/ATLAS — but what Harvard scientist Avi Loeb just said in a live interview takes the mystery to a whole new level. According to Loeb, 3I/ATLAS isn’t just “strange.” Its behavior is so unusual that scientists are now questioning if this object is even natural. Here’s what he revealed: 🔸 Jets firing in every direction — something real comets don’t do. 🔸 Nickel without iron — a combination only seen in man-made industrial alloys. 🔸 A glow in FRONT of the object, not behind it. No one knows why. 🔸 A perfect path along the plane of our planets — a one-in-500 chance for a random object. Almost like it’s moving with intention. 🔸 And yes… he openly said it might be a technological object, possibly releasing probes. Loeb even compared it to a “Trojan Horse,” warning that we shouldn’t assume every visitor is harmless. But here’s the part everyone is talking about: 🛰️ Amateur astronomers captured clearer images than NASA itself. Loeb says NASA’s cameras weren’t optimized for it — but the timing feels… odd. And now? 3I/ATLAS is getting closer. December 19 is the day to watch. Whatever this object is, its secrets are only just beginning to unfold. And the next few weeks could change everything we thought we knew. #3IATLAS #interstellarobject #spacemystery

Astronomy Vibes

33,370 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🌌🚨 3I/ATLAS is at its closest point to Earth TODAY — & it could be changing YOUR consciousness! 🚨🌌 Friends — the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS passes closer to Earth TODAY than at any other point in its trajectory! Many scientists believe it’s a vast comet; but I must be honest: I am NOT convinced that is all it is. In my view, its trajectory, timing & origin strongly suggest it may be an alien probe or interstellar TRANSMITTOR — intelligently launched & propelled through the universe - perhaps with a mission to EMIT an energetic frequency & consciousness changing SIGNAL to every civilisation it passes by on its path. I am convinced it’s a CATAYLST — here to awaken something deep within us, to remind us that we are NOT alone, & that we are not merely citizens of Earth, but citizens of a vast cosmic conglomeration. Throughout history, ancient civilizations understood celestial visitors as symbols of CHANGE. The Romans, the Babylonians, the Egyptians & the Mayans — almost ALL ancient cultures — saw comets & celestial events as powerful OMENS of TRANSFORMATION, because they knew intuitively that the heavens & humanity are deeply connected. As above, SO below! That is why I strongly believe 3I/ATLAS signifies a BIG CHANGE for humanity. And I feel - very strongly – this change could be directly tied to DISCLOSURE! For decades, governments around the world have hidden the truth about UFOs/UAPs & aliens. I KNOW this first hand. The secrets are REAL. The technology is REAL. Their presence is REAL! The public has been slowly GROOMED — through films, television & culture. It was never just entertainment. It was CONDITIONING. It was DESENITIZATION. It was PREPARATION! Spielberg’s next blockbuster is just part of this final phase. I believe a groundbreaking disclosure announcement is IMMINENT - one that will change how humanity sees itself & its place in the universe. Think of 2001: A Space Odyssey. In that story, the MONOLITH appears at key moments to TRIGGER leaps in human consciousness. I believe 3I/ATLAS may be playing a similar role — triggering a shift in our understanding of who we are. And you may even feel that shift starting TODAY! Astrologers believe celestial changes can influence our biology, energy, emotions and society. And we know scientifically that the Moon not only affects tides but also the human psyche, and solar activity also has mental, emotional and psychological effects on us as well! So today, look up at the sky - feel the wonder… the mystery… and KNOW that we are NOT alone. The universe is NOT random. It is a conversation — & today it speaks through 3I/ATLAS. Finally… on a lighter note 😉 Since tomorrow is my birthday, perhaps 3I/ATLAS is passing close to Earth today just to wish me a cosmic Happy Birthday 👽🎉✨#3IATLAS #UFO #Aliens #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #UAP

Uri Geller

54,844 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

"If I saw that 3I/Atlas was...zigzagging, or approaching Earth, or releasing some mini probes...then obviously, you know, the stock market may crash." ~Avi (Pretty solid answer here from today's podcast/debate with the added bonus of some light shots at Shermer.) Dr. Avi Loeb: "The truth is not decided by authority. I don't care about what Alan Stern says. I don't care about what P(David|Kipping) ∝ P(Kipping|David) P(David) says. If the data shows something really anomalous, they can continue to say that it's a dark comet. "On January 2, 2025, there was an object catalogued by the minor planets...the main authority designated by the international astronomy union. They found a near-Earth asteroid and gave it a name. And then [later] they realized that, 'Oh, that one follows the path of the Tesla Roadster car that was launched by SpaceX in 2018.' Removed it immediately from their catalog. "And there were dozens of cases like that, where astronomers say, 'It's a rock! Oh, wait a minute. No, it's a spacecraft or some space debris that we launched.' Now, what about spacecraft or space debris that other civilizations launched? We don't know their trajectories. And those same astronomers that Michael Shermer calls experts would say and insist that they must be rocks of a type that we've never seen before. That was done for Oumuamua. "There were experts that Michael would really respect that said, 'You know, it's a hydrogen iceberg. It's a nitrogen iceberg. It's a dust bunny.' These were the mainstream suggestions. Can you believe it? Things we've never seen before. A dust bunny being Oumuamua? A hydrogen iceberg. These are the experts that Michael wants us to listen to (I love these little jabs at Shermer. ~Joe)! And I'm saying, science depends on the level of evidence. So obviously, eventually, if we have enough evidence... "So, what I would like, you know, if I saw that 3I/Atlas was maneuvering, just to give an example, if it was maneuvering, then obviously, you know, the stock market may crash. Because that kind of a maneuver that cannot be accounted for by the rocket effect of a comet - if it's like, zigzagging or approaching Earth or releasing some mini probes - you know, that would be clear indication that it's technological. Or if it broadcasts something or has artificial lights. "However, if it becomes, you know, clear that it has a cometary tail of the type that is expected from natural objects, I would... You know, I invented the scale last month. Now it's called the Loeb scale, where zero means natural, ten means artificial and likely to threaten Earth. And so far, I gave it a four, 3I/Atlas. But, I would bring it down to zero if we get more data as it comes close to the sun and it erupts just like a comet, I would say, 'Yeah, it's natural. I bring it down to zero.' "Now you may ask, 'How is it that you are changing your mind? Is it under pressure?' No, it's because we have more data and science. You know, whoever pretends that scientists know the answer is wrong, because, you know, we thought that we detected B-mode polarization from inflation. It ended up being dust from, you know, the Milky Way Galaxy. And that's just an example of how science is done in iterations. It takes more and more data, eventually, to figure out what's going on."

Joe Murgia

26,271 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨AVI LOEB ISSUES WARNING ON 3I/ATLAS 🚨😱 ⚠️Harvard astrophysicist Professor Avi Loeb is once again challenging mainstream assumptions—this time over the mysterious interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, urging scientists to abandon complacency and confront what he calls a growing list of unexplained anomalies. 😳In a detailed interview with filmmaker and author L.A. Marzulli, Loeb stressed that 3I/ATLAS cannot be casually dismissed as “just another comet.”☄️ 🗣️ “There are a large number of anomalies about this object,” Loeb said. “Even if you think it’s a comet, you must ask why these anomalies exist.” 🌌 WHY 3I/ATLAS IS DIFFERENT • It is only the third interstellar object ever observed • Scientists have no real expertise or baseline for such objects • Assuming it behaves like solar-system comets is, according to Loeb, scientific arrogance ☀️ THE ANTI-TAIL PROBLEM One of the strangest features is a persistent jet pointing toward the Sun, sometimes called an anti-tail. Normally, comet dust and gas are pushed away by solar radiation. Here, the glow extends in front of the object, toward the Sun — something Loeb says is not well explained by known physics. 🔭 HUBBLE’S SHOCKING FIND Hubble Space Telescope images revealed four distinct, symmetrically spaced jets. Loeb admitted: “I tried to explain it… but it remains a puzzle.” 🧭 ORBITAL COINCIDENCES • The object travels almost exactly within the planetary plane • Probability of this alignment: ~1 in 500 • Rotation axis appears directed toward the Sun Loeb asks: “Why these coincidences?” ⚙️ ODD COMPOSITION 3I/ATLAS reportedly contains large amounts of nickel with very little iron. Loeb notes this ratio is: • Rare in nature • Common in industrial nickel alloys produced technologically 👁️‍🗨️ THE BIGGER ISSUE Loeb warns that institutional resistance to unlikely ideas can blind science to “black swan events” — low probability, high impact phenomena. 🗣️ “You multiply small probability by big impact, and you get something that must be taken seriously.” 📅 WHAT’S NEXT A critical moment is coming: March 16, 2026, when 3I/ATLAS enters Jupiter’s gravitational domain — an event Loeb says could reveal new clues. 🚫 Loeb does not claim it is alien technology. ✅ He insists it is not fully understood. ⚠️ And dismissing anomalies without explanation is bad science. Natural object? Possibly. Ordinary comet? Questionable. Fully explained? Absolutely not. The universe doesn’t owe us simple answers. 👀🌌 #AviLoeb #3IATLAS #InterstellarObject #SpaceMystery #CosmicAnomaly #AlienQuestion #Astrophysics #BlackSwan

3I/ATLAS updates

22,585 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨#BREAKING FOX NEWS POSSIBLY HOSTILE, ALIEN THREAT DETECTED IN UNKNOWN INTERSTELLAR OBJECT A SHOCKING NEW STUDY CLAIMS ‘CRYPTOTERRESTRIALS’ A mysterious intergalactic object could potentially be a “hostile” alien spacecraft that’s slated to attack our planet in November, according to a controversial new study by a small group of scientists. “The consequences, should the hypothesis turn out to be correct, could potentially be dire for humanity,” the researchers wrote in the inflammatory paper, which was published July 16 to the preprint server arXiv, South West News Service reported. Dubbed 3I/ATLAS, the interstellar entity was discovered on July 1, rocketing toward the sun at more than 130,000 mph, Live Science reported. Less than 24 hours later, it was confirmed to be an interstellar object with initial observations suggesting that it could be a comet that measures up to 15 miles in diameter — larger than Manhattan. However, in the new paper, the trio of researchers suggested that it might be a piece of extraterrestrial spy technology in disguise. One of the researchers, Avi Loeb — a prominent Harvard astrophysicist known for linking extraterrestrial objects to alien life — previously made waves after floating the theory that 2017 interstellar object ʻOumuamua could be an artificial recon probe sent by an alien civilization, based on its odd shape and acceleration. In this study, which he collaborated on with Adam Hibberd and Adam Crowl of the Initiative for Interstellar Studies in London, Loeb postulated that 3I/ATLAS’s trajectory suggests a similarly alien origin. The trio felt the object’s speed — which was significantly faster than ʻOumuamua and other objects — and the fact that it entered our solar system from a different angle than its predecessors offer “various benefits to an extraterrestrial intelligence,” One benefit is that 3I/ATLAS will make close approaches to Jupiter, Mars and Venus, which could allow aliens to stealthily plant spy “gadgets” there, Loeb wrote. When the so-called undercover UFO reaches its closest to the Sun (perihelion) in late November, it will be concealed from Earth’s view. “This could be intentional to avoid detailed observations from Earth-based telescopes when the object is brightest or when gadgets are sent to Earth from that hidden vantage point,” Loeb declared. If this anomaly is a “technological artifact,” this could support the dark forest hypothesis, which argues we haven’t found signs of extraterrestrial entities because they are remaining undercover to shield themselves from predators or prey. Loeb warns that this could suggest that an attack is likely and would “possibly require defensive measures to be undertaken.” Per NewYork Post #UFO #ufotwitter

SANTINO

23,313 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

🚨 The Mystery Deepens: Has 3I/ATLAS Broken Apart... or Activated? 👀 Something extraordinary is unfolding in our skies — and scientists aren’t ruling out anything. Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb has just shared stunning new details about the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, and it’s unlike any comet we’ve ever seen. After passing close to the Sun on October 29, telescopes detected seven powerful jets shooting from the object — some stretching over a million kilometers through space. Loeb says these jets carry an enormous amount of mass, meaning a natural comet would have to be at least 20 kilometers wide or shattered into many smaller pieces to produce them. In other words, 3I/ATLAS might have exploded into fragments. But here’s where it gets truly mysterious — if those jets aren’t natural, Loeb says they could be thrusters. And that would mean we’re not looking at a broken rock at all… but something engineered — perhaps a technological object using controlled propulsion. In the coming weeks, scientists across the globe — including the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes — will track 3I/ATLAS as it moves closer to Earth, reaching its nearest point on December 19. By then, Loeb says, we’ll finally know whether this interstellar visitor is a comet, a fragmented mystery, or something far more unearthly. 🎄 “Whatever it is,” Loeb says, “by the holidays, we’ll know — whether it’s just a rock... or something more exciting.” Wouldn’t that be one wild Christmas gift for humanity? 🌌 🎥 Watch below as Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb himself reveals these shocking new updates: #3IATLAS #AviLoeb #spacemystery #interstellarobject

Astronomy Vibes

91,780 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

jensen spitting bars "So, China is the largest contributor to open source software in the world. Fact. Right? China's the largest contributor to open models in the world. Fact. Today it's built on the American tech stack Nvidia. Fact. All five layers of the tech stack for AI is important. United States ought to go win all five of them. They're all important. The one that is the most important, of course, is the AI application layer. The layer that diffuses into society, the one that uses it most will benefit from this industrial revolution most. But my point is that every layer has to succeed. If we scare this country into thinking that AI is somehow a nuclear bomb so that everybody hates AI and everybody's afraid of AI, I don't know how you're helping the United States. You're doing a disservice. If we scare everybody out of doing software engineering jobs because it's going to kill every software engineering job and we don't have any software engineers as a result of that, we're doing a disservice to United States. If we scare everybody out of radiology so nobody wants to be a radiologist because computer vision is completely free and no AI is going to do a worse job than radiologists and we misunderstand the difference between a job and a task. The job of a radiologist, patient care, task to read a scan. If we misunderstand that so profoundly and we scare everybody out of going to radiology school, we're not going to have enough radiologists and good enough healthcare. So I'm making the case that when you make a premise that is so extreme, everything goes from zero or infinity. We end up scaring people in a way that's just not true. Life is not like that. Do we want United States to be first? Of course we do. Do we need to be a leader in every layer of that stack? Of course we do. Of course we do. Is today you're talking about Mythos because Mythos is important? Sure, that's fantastic, but in a few years time, I'm making you the prediction that when we want the American tech stack, when we want American technology to be diffused around the world, out to India, out to the Middle East, out to Africa, out to Southeast Asia, when our country would like to export because we would like to export our technology, we would like to export our standards. On that day, I want you and I to have that same conversation again, and I will tell you exactly about today's conversation, about how your policy and what you imagined literally caused the United States to concede the second largest market in the world for no good reason at all. We shouldn't concede it. If we lose it, we lose it, but why do we concede it? Now nobody is advocating, nobody is advocating an all or nothing. Nobody is advocating all or nothing, meaning we ship everything to China at all times. Nobody's advocating that. We should always have the best technology here. We should always have the most technology here and the first, but we should also try to compete and win around the world. Both of those things can simultaneously happen. It requires some amount of nuance, some amount of maturity instead of absolutes. The world is just not absolutes."

mark erdmann

13,279 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨3I/ATLAS Is Carrying Fusion Fuel at Impossible Levels and the Mainstream Explanation Doesn't Hold Dr. Avi Loeb is laying out something about 3I/ATLAS that is buried inside a technical discussion, one that you and I may not get to hear about in mainstream science. However the point that Loeb is making is really difficult to ignore when you listen to the facts. We are all aware by now that we are dealing with an interstellar object, something that didn't originate in our solar system, that passed through and was observed closely enough for its chemical composition to be analyzed. That was an amazing opportunity, but what came out of that analysis is where things start to get spicy. The reason I say that this is interesting is because of deuterium. Yes it is a known isotope of hydrogen with an extra neutron and yes it exists everywhere, but only in very small quantities. Across the universe, the ratio is remarkably consistent. Roughly one atom of deuterium for every 50k atoms of hydrogen. That number doesn't change much whether you're looking at stars, gas clouds, or planetary systems. Even in places where it's slightly elevated, like Earth's oceans, it's still nowhere near significant enough to stand out in a major way. It's measurable, but it doesn't dominate anything. That's the baseline that we have to make comparisons from. Now take that baseline and compare it to what was measured in 3I/ATLAS. Instead of one in 50k, you're looking at something closer to one in a hundred in water, and one in thirty in methane. That is a huge jump and once you take that into consideration you're no longer talking about natural variation in any conventional sense at least. The first explanation is the one you would expect. Extremely cold environments, possibly tied to very early star formation, where deuterium can be preserved more efficiently than in regions like our own solar system. All that explanation does is give you a place to put the anomaly without breaking anything, aka mainstream scientific models. But it doesn't actually resolve the full picture. Here's why... The same object showing this deuterium enrichment also contains heavier elements like carbon and oxygen in ways that don't align with those early environments. The universe at that stage didn't have enough of those elements available in the right quantities to produce what we're seeing now. So what you end up with is a contradiction. The conditions that could explain the deuterium don't support the rest of the chemistry, and the conditions that support the chemistry don't explain the deuterium. That's where the conversation conversation obviously becomes difficult for the 'tenure' crowd, because when formation models stop lining up as predicted by archaic models, you're left with a narrower set of possibilities. Either there's a process we don't yet fully understand that can produce this combination, or something has happened to the material after it formed. Considerations by non mainstream science would be that this is not random alteration, but something more deliberate. Processing, concentration, separation steps that could possibly mean function rather than accident. This is where deuterium stops being just an interesting anomaly and starts mean something very different. Deuterium is one of the primary fuels used in nuclear fusion. Every serious attempt to build a functional fusion reactor on Earth relies on it, typically in combination with tritium. It's efficient, predictable, and it's exactly the kind of material you would isolate and concentrate if you intended to use it as an energy source. So when you see an object carrying deuterium at levels this far beyond any natural baseline we observe locally, we have to wonder what conditions would allow that concentration to exist, and whether those conditions are passive or active. That doesn't automatically push you into extreme conclusions, but it does move you out of the safe 'mainstream' zone where everything can be explained with known processes. That's the part that tends to get softened in how this is presented publicly of course. There's a difference between saying something is unusual and admitting that it doesn't currently fit within the models we rely on. One side invites curiosity whilst the other invites scrutiny. What you're seeing here is that tension in real time because the data is absolutely clear enough to acknowledge the anomaly, but the interpretation is being held just short of where it would need to go to fully confront it. So what you're left with is a set of open questions that aren't being pushed by mainstream science, and I am sorry if it sounds like I have a drum to bang, but here we are. Could this be evidence of a type of cosmic environment we haven't observed directly yet, one capable of producing extreme isotopic enrichment alongside complex chemistry? Is there something in the way that we're measuring or interpreting the data that's creating a misleading picture of the ratios? Or are we looking at material that hasn't remained in a purely natural state since its formation? That last question is the one that tends to sit just beneath the surface, acknowledged but not explored too directly and that's not because it's impossible, but because of what it might imply if it turned out to be true, and that's where this becomes worth paying attention to. If this isn't an isolated curiosity then it is yet another one of the already stacked list of anomalies tied to interstellar objects, unusual motion, unexpected structural behavior, and now chemical signatures. Each one on its own can be managed, explained, or set aside, but taken together, they start to form a pattern that really does warrant further consideration. 3I/ATLAS may still end up having a natural explanation and I have always maintained that is always on the table. But if that explanation exists, it's not something we've defined yet, and it's not something that fits inside of current models, and until it does, the signal remains what it is. An object from outside our system, carrying a level of fusion capable material that doesn t match anything we see in our own environment, tied to formation theories that don't fully hold up under scrutiny. #UAP #InterstellarObject #3IATLAS #SpaceAnomalies #FusionFuel #JWST #Astrophysics #UFOtwitter #Disclosure

Skywatch Signal

28,445 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨Eight Days Out: 3I/ATLAS, a Silent Mars Orbiter, and the Data NASA Can’t Control Eight days. That's all that separates us from the closest Earth flyby of interstellar object 3I/ATLAS and the timing could not be more revealing. Harvard astrophysicist Dr. Avi Loeb, who has tracked 3I/ATLAS since July, just laid out a sequence of events that raises serious questions. NASA's MAVEN spacecraft, which has been reliably orbiting Mars for nearly a decade, suddenly went silent shortly after 3I/ATLAS passed within 30 million km of the planet on October 2. According to Loeb, the last meaningful data MAVEN returned came from that very encounter. NASA has since acknowledged loss of contact conveniently placing any unreleased imagery or telemetry out of reach. MAVEN did image 3I/ATLAS. We've seen some of that data in a press conference. But now we’re told the spacecraft is unreachable, meaning no further releases, no follow ups, no clarifications. On December 19th there will be a new moon meaning zero lunar contamination. Hundreds of observatories worldwide, JWST, Hubble and ground based arrays across the globe will be getting a good look at the object. Loeb is focused on the jets around 3I/ATLAS. One of them points toward the Sun, which is highly unusual. Measuring the velocity and composition of those jets could answer a critical question. Are we seeing passive sublimation from ice, or active thrust behavior inconsistent with a natural comet? #3IATLAS #AviLoeb #InterstellarObject #UAP #UFO #NASA #JWST #Hubble #SpaceAnomalies #ScientificTransparency #Astrobiology #Disclosure Source:

Skywatch Signal

62,027 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

"Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large." "Scotland is annexed, a dominion under the English crown. And it is the English crown, not the fictional UK crown, that we're all told about. "Not a partner, not of any kind. In fact, the whole partnership story is a concoction fashioned to convince the world that Scots are part of a joint state and to disguise the fact that Scotland is, in reality, nothing other than a colony. "It's not a partner in a marriage, but a kidnap victim. And you do not escape from a kidnapper by filing for divorce from a fictional marriage. "Second, even if it were possible to break free through a referendum or an election, or to propose any other route that would be approved as lawful by the kidnapping state, the political system in Scotland would not guarantee any of the things that sing in our bones as Scots. We dream of justice, compassion, equality, prosperity and care for all without preference or privilege. "But what we have is an english system of concentrated power and privilege, which those Scots who enjoy it will not give up easily. Where the government sits in authority over the people, and the people surrender their hopes, their ambitions and their human and civil rights to the whims of their elected representatives. Where all that we hold dear, all that we depend on for decency, fairness and security, depends on the honor, honesty and good faith of those elected. "Because once it is elected, we have no means of curbing, challenging or preventing anything a government may choose to do, whether or not that's lawful, just, rational or humane. "Today, we can see the futility of the political route and the bankruptcy of the political system writ large. Our helplessness in the face of the state marching side by side with destitution and despair. "This is why liberation was born. Because the route to the Scotland we dream of neither can nor will come through the present political system, but through the restoration of the political, territorial and judicial rights, the constitutional provisions that belong to the people of this nation, in law and in justice, even under the terms of this fraudulent union, and certainly under international law. "They mean that we, the people, are sovereign, in fact, not in sound bite, the ultimate authority of this nation of Scotland. "They mean that the interests of the people, collectively known as the common good, are not only the primary purpose of government, but the only condition on which it's permitted to exist. "They mean that we are entitled to overrule, remove or replace a government that violates that condition of its existence, that fails to honour its promises, to consult the people or to act according to their wishes and welfare. "And in the modern world, that means the right to all the mechanisms that we see in a nation like Switzerland, which will make that sovereign power a reality. "All this is part of what we call decolonization, true Scottish self determination. And it is the soul and purpose of liberation Scotland. "Impossible? Other nations have trodden the path to decolonisation. Not one has bowed to the kidnapper and asked for permission. "We know now that we can gain our independence as a state by first gaining independence from a colonizing power. So that instead of waiting to reclaim real sovereignty of the people after independence, we gain our independence by first reclaiming our sovereign Scottish rights. "The next step on this road is establishing the committee of the Scottish Liberation Movement. This committee will be elected from the membership of Liberation and will operate under a ratified constitution. "And it will register Scotland's Liberation Movement with the United Nations." Sara Salyers @TheScotCongress Iain.lawson27 Salvo.Scot Colette Walker

ScotNews

20,333 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Bret Weinstein: "They are hiding everything. And what I mean by that is that they are sabotaging all of the mechanisms that we would normally use to figure out what's true. And that sounds like a wild exaggeration, but it isn't. The fact is it's not even just a an attack on the university system." "It's an attack on every single university. The research done there is low quality, not repeatable. The lessons taught there are actually, in large measure, not even true anymore. Things that are verifiably false are taught as if they are true. Our regulatory agencies work exactly in reverse." "They protect regulators from from citizens, not the other way around. So something is attacking all of the mechanisms in civilization that are supposed to seek the truth and act upon it, and that's not a coincidence." "We are now in the nightmare that Rene Descartes feared he might see in, where all of the things that he thought were were factual might not even be correct. And because our, our truth seeking apparatus has been under such intense attack, we don't know what's true. Some things that are very easy to establish." "It's not a difficult scientific question to figure out whether or not mRNA vaccines cause turbocancers. That's a very straightforward scientific problem, but we are nonetheless left to grapple with anecdote because to the extent that there are studies, they're likely to be set up to fail, and the rest is anecdote." "So we are left to make sense of the world without the most obvious basic tools, without anything that flows to us from the enlightenment, and that is indeed a very dangerous predicament."

Camus

147,895 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I added a lot to this transcript and I'm not happy right now.. A Non-Human Intelligence on this Planet? "We're not aware of anything along that line that's ever been hidden from Congress" ~Rounds "I really don't believe that that is necessarily what's happened here." ~Rounds "We haven't seen that yet. It's not something that any of us have been able to, that I've been able to identify. I'm not aware of any of it." ~Rounds ~ Ross Coulthart: "If it turns out that, for example, the United States has recovered, incredibly, non-human technology, perhaps even craft and bodies, biologics, as some people assert. If that's true, and that has not been properly disclosed to Congress, and yet, by all accounts, billions, perhaps trillions of dollars have been expended on such a program, do you see any reason why on national security grounds that ought not to be disclosed to the public? That's the key issue. I mean, are you guys gonna cave at the last minute and say, 'Well, if we do have a flying saucer in a cave, it should not be revealed to the public for national security reasons.' Can you see any reason why that wouldn't be allowed to be revealed?" (That is THE question. Like I said the other day, Ross asks good questions and this is the one I really wanted him to ask.) Rounds: "Well, there are two items here. You do have a hypothetical. We're not aware of anything along that line that's ever been hidden from Congress, directly that we're aware of." (Have any witnesses made that claim? If so, how many? Look at how different Marco Rubio responded during his interview with Joe Khalil. Rubio: "Either, what [Grusch] is saying is partially true or entirely true, or...we have some really smart, educated people with high clearances and very important positions in our government, who are crazy, and are leading us on a goose chase." ~Senator Marco Rubio Full interview transcript: (What does Rounds think about Grusch or the other folks Grusch says have gone to the IG and who allegedly have hands-on experience with these NHI craft? Has Rounds heard form them?) ~ Rounds: "Also, the second part of it is, is we don't know if there was something out there, was it actually disclosed to some members of Congress who have continued to keep it quiet based upon their concerns about the release? We don't know it." (In 2002, Admiral Wilson told Dr. Eric Davis that politicians were NOT on the list of folks who were read in, or given access, to the alleged crash retrieval program. If that has changed, and certain members of Congress HAVE been read in, that doesn't change the fact that THE WORLD DESERVES TO KNOW if we share this planet with another intelligence. Stop using the, "It might be our tech" excuse.) Rounds: "So it really is a series of hypotheticals that you're asking me." (We all know that. That's why Ross phrased the question like that.) Rounds: "But let me continue on, because I think really, if I could put it in a simpler way... Let's just say that there had been a meeting or a contact with something that we didn't believe was from this world. Whether, you know, from another country, or from our own resources. At that point, you know, I think there's gonna come a time here in which the American public and people from around the world are gonna look at it and say, 'You know, it really would be crazy for us to believe that we really were alone in the world, or in the Universe, and that there is no other intelligent life form out there." (If what we're dealing with are extraterrestrials from another planet, I agree that the masses could say, "No shit! Not a surprise!' But what if it's something that doesn't have a physical body? As George Knapp has asked : What if they can see us but we can't see them, and they can watch us when we're in the bathroom or taking a shower? How would people handle that? Or, if they're time travelers from our future, back here to save us from some sort of cataclysm? Would that cause panic? Or, even if they were "just" extraterrestrials. Would people be able to handle Reptilians who might find human meat a delicacy, or Mantid beings who look like giant bugs? As Christopher K. Mellon said in 2015: "John Podesta said publicly, the American people can handle the truth. My question would be…if you don’t know what the truth is, how do you know they can handle it? What if they’re flesh-eating arachnids or something? Doesn’t seem to make sense to me” ~Mellon ~ Rounds: "But it would be a matter of how you would disclose it correctly, and in what would be one of the greatest announcements in the history of mankind, that we are not alone." (Is it the job of politicians or governments to withhold information until they figure out the proper way to disclose it? What if the information is scary and could cause panic? Would any government have a right to withhold that information from the people? I say, hell no.) Rounds: "I really don't believe that that is necessarily what's happened here. But, we do know - and this is the part that is so sensitive to us - there are some things that we can't explain out there." (Seems like we're back to square one. Holy shit.) Rounds "And that's the reason why I really got involved in this in the first place, is, if we know that there are technologies there that appear to do things that physically, we're just not sure how it's getting done. Biggest concern I had was, is it ours? Or does it belong to somebody else on this earth, one of our adversaries? Or is it really something that is out of this world? But in any of those events, two of the three would be very serious if we disclosed it to the American public because it would mean national defense issues are being broached. And that would be, it would be one of our adversaries' capabilities, or one of our own capabilities." (In other words, it may appear to be a technology from a non-human intelligence but we have to make triple sure it's not from an adversary or our own tech!!! There's always that chance! OMG! It seems like that will always be the excuse for not disclosing.) Rounds: "The third alternative, which I wouldn't be afraid of seeing some day... (Some day? That sounds far away. When? 2040? 2050?) Rounds: "But it can't. It can't. We haven't seen that yet. It's not something that any of us have been able to, that I've been able to identify. I'm not aware of any of it. But I know that there are things that we don't know how to identify today. Does that help?" (We've known that for a long time.) Ross: "It does, sir, it does." (It doesn't really help.)

Joe Murgia

25,861 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce