正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

5) The Risk-Type Compass Goldstein found that traders fall into 8 risk profiles. Steven quickly realized if risk and personality type didn’t align, long term trading success was unlikely. But once you align it? Everything changes.

Riz Iqbal

91,831 subscribers

34,411 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

14 条评论

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

This is Steven Goldstein. He’s mentored the best traders in the world. But after 40 years in the markets, he discovered something shocking: The most successful traders leverage one specific secret. This will change retail trading forever… Here’s the secret:🧵

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

Steven’s story is incredible. This is trading advice coming from a 40-year veteran... Take notes, and read until the end to see his secret👇

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

1) From Banker to Breakthroughs Steven spent 25 years trading inside major banks. He saw how the smartest traders kept losing—while "lucky" ones thrived. Then, one question changed his life forever…

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

2) The Moment Everything Clicked A mentor asked him: Have you ever thought about coaching traders? He decided this would be his next move. But his reason for wanting to start this work had a deeper meaning…

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

If you want real trading advice, market tips, and timely market news… The Market Journal shares these insights every week for FREE. Join with the link below, and continue reading…

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

3) The Realization Goldstein saw a pattern: Traders were blowing up accounts—not from bad trades, but from fighting their own psychology. As his clients started seeing results from their work, one pattern kept popping up that couldn’t be ignored…

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

4) Correlated Struggles Your inner world plays out in the market. If you lack discipline in life, you’ll lack discipline in trades. Traders must understand themselves. Goldstein helped younger traders make breakthroughs using this simple personality test…

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

6) The Trader Who Proved It One client struggled for YEARS. They tried every strategy. Nothing worked. Then they adjusted their risk profile & strategy alignment… and their returns exploded. But it really all came down to one thing…

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

7) Sticking to the Plan Goldstein built a framework called "The Performance Process Cycle". It’s the formula behind every elite trader’s success. But most people sabotage it by making one critical mistake…

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

8) Outcome-Focused Trading Unprofitable traders obsess over quick wins, forcing bad trades. Profitable traders stick to the process—it’s essential. Your ego is the biggest threat to your PnL. How to create the process to keep you from slipping into outcome-focused trading:

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

9) Personal Risk Process You must have a clear understanding of all the factors that make or break a trade. If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. Besides staying consistent with the process, Goldstein says there’s one secret that all great traders have…

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

10) The #1 Skill of Every Elite Trader The best traders let go—instantly. - They don’t dwell on losses. - They don’t force trades for revenge. They can be fully present in the moment. They execute, adjust, and move forward.

Riz Iqbal 的头像

Riz Iqbal1 年前

Here's the full video:

Elite Trader Funding 的头像

Elite Trader Funding1 年前

Tired of prop firms spying on your trades? At Elite Trader Funding, we respect your privacy. No shady practices, no hidden agendas—just clear, consistent rules for everyone. Whether you’re on day one or day 100, every trader is treated the same.

相关视频

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.

Alex 👽

21,150 次观看 • 19 天前

Everyone keeps searching for the holy grail in trading. But as Mark Minervini says there’s only one: Risk Management. In this short 8-minute video, he explains why managing risk is the real secret behind every successful trader. Watch it this could be the video that changes the way you trade.

Everyone keeps searching for the holy grail in trading. But as Mark Minervini says there’s only one: Risk Management. In this short 8-minute video, he explains why managing risk is the real secret behind every successful trader. Watch it this could be the video that changes the way you trade.

Ankur Patel

48,594 次观看 • 8 个月前

Successful investing is rarely a solo journey. Seeking guidance from experienced professionals helps you understand risk, avoid costly mistakes, and make decisions that align with your long-term goals. The right experts turn uncertainty into clarity. In this clip, Newton Buteraba shares the steps to fruitful investments after getting out of debt.

Successful investing is rarely a solo journey. Seeking guidance from experienced professionals helps you understand risk, avoid costly mistakes, and make decisions that align with your long-term goals. The right experts turn uncertainty into clarity. In this clip, Newton Buteraba shares the steps to fruitful investments after getting out of debt.

NSSF Uganda

130,697 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨🇭🇺 🇮🇷 IRAN WAR IS A HIGH-RISK GAMBLE, AND THE OUTCOME DECIDES EVERYTHING Hungarian PM Orbán says the Iran war isn’t about intentions, it’s about outcomes. If the U.S. can quickly dismantle Iran’s destabilizing network, restore a functioning state, and bring Iran back into the global economy, then the risk might be justified. But if that doesn’t happen? Then everything changes. His warning is clear: This is a high-risk operation with no middle ground. Either it delivers a new, stable Iran…or it forces a complete rethink of the strategy. Orbán Viktor

🚨🇭🇺 🇮🇷 IRAN WAR IS A HIGH-RISK GAMBLE, AND THE OUTCOME DECIDES EVERYTHING Hungarian PM Orbán says the Iran war isn’t about intentions, it’s about outcomes. If the U.S. can quickly dismantle Iran’s destabilizing network, restore a functioning state, and bring Iran back into the global economy, then the risk might be justified. But if that doesn’t happen? Then everything changes. His warning is clear: This is a high-risk operation with no middle ground. Either it delivers a new, stable Iran…or it forces a complete rethink of the strategy. Orbán Viktor

Mario Nawfal

905,916 次观看 • 3 个月前

Dr. Peter Hotez: "There's now really good data to show that if you keep up with your vaccinations, you're less likely to get long COVID even in kids. And and there was a study, recently, published from the University of Pennsylvania. If you get COVID and you don't get sick, but you've been infected and you get through it relatively quickly, are you still at risk of long COVID? If you're not vaccinated, you're at higher risk."

Dr. Peter Hotez: "There's now really good data to show that if you keep up with your vaccinations, you're less likely to get long COVID even in kids. And and there was a study, recently, published from the University of Pennsylvania. If you get COVID and you don't get sick, but you've been infected and you get through it relatively quickly, are you still at risk of long COVID? If you're not vaccinated, you're at higher risk."

Camus

48,553 次观看 • 1 年前

Successful traders often possess qualities that contribute to personal and professional success beyond the realm of trading. From time management and financial literacy to emotional control and risk management, trading is a skill that can improve many aspects of our lives. Drop "Jalen" in the comments and let us know if you liked the video.

Successful traders often possess qualities that contribute to personal and professional success beyond the realm of trading. From time management and financial literacy to emotional control and risk management, trading is a skill that can improve many aspects of our lives. Drop "Jalen" in the comments and let us know if you liked the video.

The Funded Trader

11,256 次观看 • 2 年前

Why do you even move your stop to breakeven? Are you a gay ?? Is it part of your strategy or just fear of losing? Most traders rush to breakeven so they can feel safe or trade “risk-free”… but what is trading without risk? Breakeven doesn’t make you disciplined a solid setup and proper risk management does. Moving to BE too fast often kills good trades before they play out. If you trust your analysis, let the trade breathe. Real discipline is accepting calculated risk, not running away from it. My own opinion thou

Why do you even move your stop to breakeven? Are you a gay ?? Is it part of your strategy or just fear of losing? Most traders rush to breakeven so they can feel safe or trade “risk-free”… but what is trading without risk? Breakeven doesn’t make you disciplined a solid setup and proper risk management does. Moving to BE too fast often kills good trades before they play out. If you trust your analysis, let the trade breathe. Real discipline is accepting calculated risk, not running away from it. My own opinion thou

InveStorTolu💥

33,738 次观看 • 4 个月前

Strength training makes you harder to kill … 32% lower risk of type two diabetes 31% lower risk of dying from cancer 24% lower risk of falling in adults 17% lower risk of heart disease 20% lower risk of all causes of mortality All it takes to make you harder to kill his strength training two times a week Strength train 3 to 5 times a week for even more benefits 💪💪🔥 And yes, I did this because it was fun and I’m always trying to do something guys can’t do , Yep I just said that💪 I’m all tomboy🔥 But please don’t try this. Those are 5 inch heels !

Strength training makes you harder to kill … 32% lower risk of type two diabetes 31% lower risk of dying from cancer 24% lower risk of falling in adults 17% lower risk of heart disease 20% lower risk of all causes of mortality All it takes to make you harder to kill his strength training two times a week Strength train 3 to 5 times a week for even more benefits 💪💪🔥 And yes, I did this because it was fun and I’m always trying to do something guys can’t do , Yep I just said that💪 I’m all tomboy🔥 But please don’t try this. Those are 5 inch heels !

Wendy Lynn Myers

14,326 次观看 • 1 年前

Lloyd Blankfein (former CEO of Goldman Sachs) on something most people get backwards about risk management: "you'd think a risk manager is always trying to repress people from taking risk." "sometimes a good risk manager has to promote the idea that people take risk. because that's what you're there for." "if you don't take risk, you don't move forward. there's no growth." "the alternative to never taking any risk will give you the comfort of not losing money for yourself or anybody else, but you also won't make progress." this is true inside Goldman Sachs and it's true in trading. after recovering a drawdown, the instinct can be to cut everything and take a break. sometimes the right risk management decision is the opposite, the system is working, the drawdown is normal, and pulling back is the actual mistake.

Lloyd Blankfein (former CEO of Goldman Sachs) on something most people get backwards about risk management: "you'd think a risk manager is always trying to repress people from taking risk." "sometimes a good risk manager has to promote the idea that people take risk. because that's what you're there for." "if you don't take risk, you don't move forward. there's no growth." "the alternative to never taking any risk will give you the comfort of not losing money for yourself or anybody else, but you also won't make progress." this is true inside Goldman Sachs and it's true in trading. after recovering a drawdown, the instinct can be to cut everything and take a break. sometimes the right risk management decision is the opposite, the system is working, the drawdown is normal, and pulling back is the actual mistake.

Goshawk Trades

20,801 次观看 • 29 天前

🦄55 Min Long Video based on the queries. Do ask Questions in the comments if you have 🐰Topics Discussed - 1)My Thought Process of Trading 2)Why I Use Dynamic Risk Management 3)How to Build a PlayBook 4)How to Start Trading with Small Capital 5)A Simple High RR Type-B Setup

🦄55 Min Long Video based on the queries. Do ask Questions in the comments if you have 🐰Topics Discussed - 1)My Thought Process of Trading 2)Why I Use Dynamic Risk Management 3)How to Build a PlayBook 4)How to Start Trading with Small Capital 5)A Simple High RR Type-B Setup

JLX Trades

116,893 次观看 • 2 年前

DOOCY: “For Iran, is there a risk that strikes could turn into a long, drawn-out conflict in the Middle East?” TRUMP: “There’s always a risk. When there's war, there's a risk in anything, both good and bad.” “It would be wonderful if they’d negotiate, really in good conscience, good faith... But they are not getting there." | Peter Doocy

DOOCY: “For Iran, is there a risk that strikes could turn into a long, drawn-out conflict in the Middle East?” TRUMP: “There’s always a risk. When there's war, there's a risk in anything, both good and bad.” “It would be wonderful if they’d negotiate, really in good conscience, good faith... But they are not getting there." | Peter Doocy

Fox News

435,885 次观看 • 4 个月前

For Walt Disney, Snow White was his biggest risk yet. He put all of his finances, both personal and corporate, into its success. If it had failed, it would have been the end of Disney. But it didn’t, and it made Disney what we know it to be today. However, the following three films, Pinocchio, Fantasia, and Bambi, failed at the box office, and Walt was broke once again. Walt was always risking it all in search for something greater. Sometimes finding success, sometimes finding failure, but never giving up.

For Walt Disney, Snow White was his biggest risk yet. He put all of his finances, both personal and corporate, into its success. If it had failed, it would have been the end of Disney. But it didn’t, and it made Disney what we know it to be today. However, the following three films, Pinocchio, Fantasia, and Bambi, failed at the box office, and Walt was broke once again. Walt was always risking it all in search for something greater. Sometimes finding success, sometimes finding failure, but never giving up.

Marlin, Esq

11,920 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk just told you why caution kills more companies than risk ever has. Musk: “One of the approaches we did take was to proceed at risk with temporary permits.” Hundreds of millions in concrete before the final signature exists. Knowing the full downside. Musk: “Your long-term permit could be denied, in which case you have to stop everything.” Tear it all down. Back to dirt. Every board on Earth calls that unacceptable. Musk calls it cheaper than the alternative. Musk: “Most companies are not willing to take the risk of the temporary permit, and then the risk of having to stop and tear down.” They think they are avoiding risk. They are selecting one. Waiting is not neutral. Waiting is a position. A bet that the market holds, the team stays, and momentum outlasts a system designed to outlast you. It never does. No one says no. The calendar says it for them. Not rejection. Erosion. Musk saw it for what it was. He chose the risk you can see over the risk you cannot. Gigafactories rose in months while the rest of the industry waited on the meeting about the permit. The gap was never resources. It was the willingness to see that waiting is not free. It is the most expensive decision in business. Because it is the only one nobody knows they are making.

Elon Musk just told you why caution kills more companies than risk ever has. Musk: “One of the approaches we did take was to proceed at risk with temporary permits.” Hundreds of millions in concrete before the final signature exists. Knowing the full downside. Musk: “Your long-term permit could be denied, in which case you have to stop everything.” Tear it all down. Back to dirt. Every board on Earth calls that unacceptable. Musk calls it cheaper than the alternative. Musk: “Most companies are not willing to take the risk of the temporary permit, and then the risk of having to stop and tear down.” They think they are avoiding risk. They are selecting one. Waiting is not neutral. Waiting is a position. A bet that the market holds, the team stays, and momentum outlasts a system designed to outlast you. It never does. No one says no. The calendar says it for them. Not rejection. Erosion. Musk saw it for what it was. He chose the risk you can see over the risk you cannot. Gigafactories rose in months while the rest of the industry waited on the meeting about the permit. The gap was never resources. It was the willingness to see that waiting is not free. It is the most expensive decision in business. Because it is the only one nobody knows they are making.

Dustin

18,985 次观看 • 25 天前

Too hard to Dp this ( and I can Dp everything), instead choose a high hitting normal (stmp in sagats case) thats risk free even if it whiffs, you hit alex into a juggle state. Dont risk the whiffed DP its too hard. Last combo is only for Cats that have Tiger reactions. 🐯

Too hard to Dp this ( and I can Dp everything), instead choose a high hitting normal (stmp in sagats case) thats risk free even if it whiffs, you hit alex into a juggle state. Dont risk the whiffed DP its too hard. Last combo is only for Cats that have Tiger reactions. 🐯

Totalsagat

68,720 次观看 • 3 个月前

If you get the MMR vaccine younger than you’re supposed to, are you at greater risk? The CDC, to their credit, did the research and what they found was that this was accurate. Then they spent the next 14 years covering it up…

If you get the MMR vaccine younger than you’re supposed to, are you at greater risk? The CDC, to their credit, did the research and what they found was that this was accurate. Then they spent the next 14 years covering it up…

Children’s Health Defense

28,128 次观看 • 1 年前

I'm all for criticism. I thought the market would keep going up and we'd get a big new ETH ATH. We did not. It went to shit. That said. I never promised anything. I was incredibly clear how high risk my bet was on these coins and that we were going to zero if the market reversed. Saying I was wrong. Sure. Fair. Saying I promised returns and not even mentioning my other is well..Unfair. Advice I constantly stated like -If your new stick to top 10 coins -Do not get into mid/low caps if you cannot stomach losing everything -That if your in this for less than a few years, do not touch low caps I took huge risk in low caps. The risk didn't pay off. I never ever once said it wasn't a massive risk and covered this exact outcome as likely. I said this every damn video at length. Have a nice day.

I'm all for criticism. I thought the market would keep going up and we'd get a big new ETH ATH. We did not. It went to shit. That said. I never promised anything. I was incredibly clear how high risk my bet was on these coins and that we were going to zero if the market reversed. Saying I was wrong. Sure. Fair. Saying I promised returns and not even mentioning my other is well..Unfair. Advice I constantly stated like -If your new stick to top 10 coins -Do not get into mid/low caps if you cannot stomach losing everything -That if your in this for less than a few years, do not touch low caps I took huge risk in low caps. The risk didn't pay off. I never ever once said it wasn't a massive risk and covered this exact outcome as likely. I said this every damn video at length. Have a nice day.

Alex Becker 🍊🏆🥇

74,016 次观看 • 2 个月前

How Pfizer duped billions via statistical manipulation: Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right? But that's not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the relative risk reduction, but it doesn't tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we need absolute risk reduction. In the Pfizer trial, 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the vaccine developed COVID-19. In the unvaccinated placebo group, 162 people got it, which means that even without the vaccine, the risk of contracting COVID-19 was extremely low at 0.88%, which the vaccine then reduced to 0.04%. So the net benefit or the absolute risk reduction that you're being offered with a Pfizer vaccine is 0.84%. That 95% number, that refers to the relative difference between 0.88 and 0.04%. That's what they call 95% relative risk reduction. And relative risk reduction is well known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using absolute risk reduction instead, which begs the question, how many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit? You're entitled to know the risks and side effects. In Canada, any potentially serious risk must be disclosed.

How Pfizer duped billions via statistical manipulation: Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right? But that's not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the relative risk reduction, but it doesn't tell you how much your overall risk is reduced by vaccination. For that, we need absolute risk reduction. In the Pfizer trial, 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the vaccine developed COVID-19. In the unvaccinated placebo group, 162 people got it, which means that even without the vaccine, the risk of contracting COVID-19 was extremely low at 0.88%, which the vaccine then reduced to 0.04%. So the net benefit or the absolute risk reduction that you're being offered with a Pfizer vaccine is 0.84%. That 95% number, that refers to the relative difference between 0.88 and 0.04%. That's what they call 95% relative risk reduction. And relative risk reduction is well known to be a misleading number, which is why the FDA recommends using absolute risk reduction instead, which begs the question, how many people would have chosen to take the COVID-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit? You're entitled to know the risks and side effects. In Canada, any potentially serious risk must be disclosed.

Camus

44,169 次观看 • 10 个月前

LONG or SHORT? Because right now… the odds are screaming one direction. 8:00am New York Session. Both indicators agree: • New York Probability Map • Intelligent Balance 75.8%+ probability of sweeping London’s Low first. So while most traders are about to randomly click buy or sell… I already know which side has the statistical advantage. That doesn’t guarantee the trade. But it changes the entire way you approach execution. Trading becomes calmer. Cleaner. More intentional. Because when probabilities align BEFORE New York opens… you stop guessing. You start trading with odds on your side. So be honest: Are you longing into 75.8% downside probability… or trading with the statistics?

LONG or SHORT? Because right now… the odds are screaming one direction. 8:00am New York Session. Both indicators agree: • New York Probability Map • Intelligent Balance 75.8%+ probability of sweeping London’s Low first. So while most traders are about to randomly click buy or sell… I already know which side has the statistical advantage. That doesn’t guarantee the trade. But it changes the entire way you approach execution. Trading becomes calmer. Cleaner. More intentional. Because when probabilities align BEFORE New York opens… you stop guessing. You start trading with odds on your side. So be honest: Are you longing into 75.8% downside probability… or trading with the statistics?

Herman Trading

17,870 次观看 • 2 个月前

Leon just finally gave us the map 🗺️ 1) Every personnel decision was viewed through the context and lens of “can this person do this in NYC” 2) I believe i heard 5 “fit”s in this 2 minute clip. Everything was about chemistry and fit. 3) Did the “trial and error” thing and learned from the Indy series that they needed to upgrade on handling opposing teams ball pressure (this was key for us vs san antonio) If I owe anyone an apology its Leon. I was on his head and at the time i dont regret it bc it was bleak. But He ultimately emptied the clip and took a HUGE risk that ultimately paid off. A risk I would have been unwilling to make. He took MASSIVE risk. Firing a head coach who led you to the first ecf in 25 years and trading every tradeable pick for Mikal. Hes the architect of all this. He was right, i was wrong and his risk paid off. salute to him 🫡

Leon just finally gave us the map 🗺️ 1) Every personnel decision was viewed through the context and lens of “can this person do this in NYC” 2) I believe i heard 5 “fit”s in this 2 minute clip. Everything was about chemistry and fit. 3) Did the “trial and error” thing and learned from the Indy series that they needed to upgrade on handling opposing teams ball pressure (this was key for us vs san antonio) If I owe anyone an apology its Leon. I was on his head and at the time i dont regret it bc it was bleak. But He ultimately emptied the clip and took a HUGE risk that ultimately paid off. A risk I would have been unwilling to make. He took MASSIVE risk. Firing a head coach who led you to the first ecf in 25 years and trading every tradeable pick for Mikal. Hes the architect of all this. He was right, i was wrong and his risk paid off. salute to him 🫡

Ari From Manhattan 💧💧

89,736 次观看 • 22 天前