正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

How Pfizer duped billions via statistical manipulation: Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right? But that's not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the relative risk reduction, but it doesn't tell you how...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

354,164 subscribers

44,169 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Conclusion is Inescapable: When You Replace the 50% Relative Risk with the 2% Absolute Risk, the COVID Vaccine Narrative Collapses. This was the great statistical deception deployed for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Regulators and pharmaceutical companies had a choice: report Absolute Risk Reduction (the real-world benefit) or Relative Risk Reduction (the impressive-sounding headline). They consistently chose the latter to frame the vaccines as a monumental success. Let's break down the math that shaped global policy: • Absolute Risk (The Truth in Context): If your risk of symptomatic COVID drops from a baseline of 3% to 1% after the shot, that is a 2% Absolute Risk Reduction. This is the tangible difference for an individual. • Relative Risk (The Manipulated Headline): That same change is spun as a "50% improvement." The benefit appears revolutionary, while the real-world impact for the individual is far more modest. This was not a minor oversight. It was a calculated communication strategy that obscured the true, absolute benefit of the mRNA products. As analyst Leslie Manookian warned, those who read the initial trial data saw this immediately. The primary endpoint was the reduction of mild symptoms, yet the efficacy was marketed to the public using this statistical sleight-of-hand. The story of overwhelming, individual benefit only holds under the lens of relative risk. Under the harsh, transparent light of absolute risk, the narrative shifts dramatically. Demanding this transparency for COVID-19 vaccines isn't anti-science—it is the bedrock of true scientific and informed consent.
1:04

The Conclusion is Inescapable: When You Replace the 50% Relative Risk with the 2% Absolute Risk, the COVID Vaccine Narrative Collapses. This was the great statistical deception deployed for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Regulators and pharmaceutical companies had a choice: report Absolute Risk Reduction (the real-world benefit) or Relative Risk Reduction (the impressive-sounding headline). They consistently chose the latter to frame the vaccines as a monumental success. Let's break down the math that shaped global policy: • Absolute Risk (The Truth in Context): If your risk of symptomatic COVID drops from a baseline of 3% to 1% after the shot, that is a 2% Absolute Risk Reduction. This is the tangible difference for an individual. • Relative Risk (The Manipulated Headline): That same change is spun as a "50% improvement." The benefit appears revolutionary, while the real-world impact for the individual is far more modest. This was not a minor oversight. It was a calculated communication strategy that obscured the true, absolute benefit of the mRNA products. As analyst Leslie Manookian warned, those who read the initial trial data saw this immediately. The primary endpoint was the reduction of mild symptoms, yet the efficacy was marketed to the public using this statistical sleight-of-hand. The story of overwhelming, individual benefit only holds under the lens of relative risk. Under the harsh, transparent light of absolute risk, the narrative shifts dramatically. Demanding this transparency for COVID-19 vaccines isn't anti-science—it is the bedrock of true scientific and informed consent.

Camus

25,891 次观看 • 8 个月前

Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) are both used to measure the effectiveness of a treatment in clinical studies. ARR measures the absolute difference in risk between control groups, providing the true reduction. RRR measures the proportional reduction relative to the control group, often making effects look larger. Lying with statistics
2:36

Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) are both used to measure the effectiveness of a treatment in clinical studies. ARR measures the absolute difference in risk between control groups, providing the true reduction. RRR measures the proportional reduction relative to the control group, often making effects look larger. Lying with statistics

Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

16,839 次观看 • 2 个月前

Pfizer's Own Trials Showed a 24% GREATER Likelihood of Dying in the Vaccine Group After 6 Months "For every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." • In the Pfizer clinical trials, they gave 22,000 people two COVID injections and 22,000 people fake vaccines. • Of the 44,000 in total, one person died of COVID in the vaccine group, and two people died of COVID in the placebo group. So Pfizer, with the misleading measure of relative risk reduction, called their vaccine "100% effective" because two is 100% greater than one. But from the angle of absolute risk, it took 22,000 vaccines to save just one life from COVID. • And over a 6-month period, 21 of the vaccinated people died of all causes, whereas only 17 people died in the placebo group, a 24% difference. So what was killing those people in the vaccine group? "It was cardiac arrest," attested Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "There were five cardiac arrest deaths in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group. What that means is that if you take that vaccine, you're [five times] more likely to die from a fatal cardiac arrest over the next six months than if you don't. What it also means is that for every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." Full Interview:
4:26

Pfizer's Own Trials Showed a 24% GREATER Likelihood of Dying in the Vaccine Group After 6 Months "For every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." • In the Pfizer clinical trials, they gave 22,000 people two COVID injections and 22,000 people fake vaccines. • Of the 44,000 in total, one person died of COVID in the vaccine group, and two people died of COVID in the placebo group. So Pfizer, with the misleading measure of relative risk reduction, called their vaccine "100% effective" because two is 100% greater than one. But from the angle of absolute risk, it took 22,000 vaccines to save just one life from COVID. • And over a 6-month period, 21 of the vaccinated people died of all causes, whereas only 17 people died in the placebo group, a 24% difference. So what was killing those people in the vaccine group? "It was cardiac arrest," attested Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "There were five cardiac arrest deaths in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group. What that means is that if you take that vaccine, you're [five times] more likely to die from a fatal cardiac arrest over the next six months than if you don't. What it also means is that for every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." Full Interview:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,203,317 次观看 • 3 年前

Best clips of 2025 🏆 💉 “All risk, no benefit”? 💬 “The 95% number was relative risk reduction — real efficacy was just 0.84%. That’s what should’ve been told to the people of New Zealand.” - Dr Alison Goodwin Big Pharma’s spin, backed by government silence, painted a false picture of safety and efficacy. Did you ever hear the full truth about the vaccine trial data? 🎥 Watch here: ✍️ Sign the petition:
2:48

Best clips of 2025 🏆 💉 “All risk, no benefit”? 💬 “The 95% number was relative risk reduction — real efficacy was just 0.84%. That’s what should’ve been told to the people of New Zealand.” - Dr Alison Goodwin Big Pharma’s spin, backed by government silence, painted a false picture of safety and efficacy. Did you ever hear the full truth about the vaccine trial data? 🎥 Watch here: ✍️ Sign the petition:

REALITY CHECK RADIO

44,849 次观看 • 5 个月前

RFK Jr. addresses if he will be removing the Covid vaccine as a mandatory shot for children. “President Trump doesn't believe that anybody should get mandatory vaccines.” “The covid vaccine recommendation for children was always dubious.” “Kids had almost no risk for Covid.” “So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk.” “This was clear even in the clinical data that came out from Pfizer.” “There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group.”
1:13

RFK Jr. addresses if he will be removing the Covid vaccine as a mandatory shot for children. “President Trump doesn't believe that anybody should get mandatory vaccines.” “The covid vaccine recommendation for children was always dubious.” “Kids had almost no risk for Covid.” “So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk.” “This was clear even in the clinical data that came out from Pfizer.” “There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group.”

End Tribalism in Politics

152,296 次观看 • 1 年前

The "95% effective" Scam How many people would have chosen to take the Covid-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit? Jacinda Ardern Dr Siouxsie Wiles Helen Petousis
2:51

The "95% effective" Scam How many people would have chosen to take the Covid-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit? Jacinda Ardern Dr Siouxsie Wiles Helen Petousis

Coronavirus Plushie

35,558 次观看 • 5 个月前

"My overall message to all New Zealanders is that the vaccine is a very safe vaccine, and any SMALL risk associated with the vaccine is by FAR outweighed by the risk of getting COVID-19." That's what Chris Hipkins said on Dec 20, 2021 when he was asked if he had a message for the family of 26 year old Rory Nairn who died from Pfizer shot-related myocarditis. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®
2:01

"My overall message to all New Zealanders is that the vaccine is a very safe vaccine, and any SMALL risk associated with the vaccine is by FAR outweighed by the risk of getting COVID-19." That's what Chris Hipkins said on Dec 20, 2021 when he was asked if he had a message for the family of 26 year old Rory Nairn who died from Pfizer shot-related myocarditis. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

Coronavirus Plushie

32,021 次观看 • 3 个月前

“I’ve never seen a vaccine like this,” testified pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan. The shot Pfizer and Moderna offered us made the COVID situation worse. According to a Cleveland Clinic study, the people who had the most shots had the greatest chance of contracting COVID. “The lowest risk for getting COVID is if you’ve had zero vaccines. As you add vaccines, your risk of getting COVID goes up. I’ve never seen a vaccine like this. That’s not the basis of vaccines.”
0:31

“I’ve never seen a vaccine like this,” testified pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan. The shot Pfizer and Moderna offered us made the COVID situation worse. According to a Cleveland Clinic study, the people who had the most shots had the greatest chance of contracting COVID. “The lowest risk for getting COVID is if you’ve had zero vaccines. As you add vaccines, your risk of getting COVID goes up. I’ve never seen a vaccine like this. That’s not the basis of vaccines.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,187,056 次观看 • 2 年前

RFK Jr.’s REAL position on vaccines, in his own words: “My position is that if you want a vaccine, you ought to be able to get a vaccine. But you ought to know the safety profile and the risk profile and the efficacy of that vaccine. That’s it.”
0:33

RFK Jr.’s REAL position on vaccines, in his own words: “My position is that if you want a vaccine, you ought to be able to get a vaccine. But you ought to know the safety profile and the risk profile and the efficacy of that vaccine. That’s it.”

Holden Culotta

186,975 次观看 • 1 年前

RFK Jr: "In 1989... all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared." "The CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule... so they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at... kids who got it later or didn't get it at all, and they compared these two groups." "Among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was... a relative risk of 11.35 [for a subsequent autism diagnosis]. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed... The link between smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35." "So they knew what it was, and then they had an emergency meeting that they called... and they had all of the big panjandrums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry... from NIH, CDC, FDA, the WHO, the European Medicines Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study." "Somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me... The second day they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public, and I published these things... I took a lot of heat at that point."
3:25

RFK Jr: "In 1989... all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared." "The CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule... so they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at... kids who got it later or didn't get it at all, and they compared these two groups." "Among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was... a relative risk of 11.35 [for a subsequent autism diagnosis]. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed... The link between smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35." "So they knew what it was, and then they had an emergency meeting that they called... and they had all of the big panjandrums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry... from NIH, CDC, FDA, the WHO, the European Medicines Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study." "Somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me... The second day they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public, and I published these things... I took a lot of heat at that point."

Wide Awake Media

755,783 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. McCullough: "Pfizer Should Have Never Been Approved" In Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, there were more deaths in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, denoted Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "And if it [the data] would be properly analyzed, the conclusion was there's a three to fourfold excess cardiovascular risk with Pfizer compared to placebo."
1:33

Dr. McCullough: "Pfizer Should Have Never Been Approved" In Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, there were more deaths in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, denoted Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "And if it [the data] would be properly analyzed, the conclusion was there's a three to fourfold excess cardiovascular risk with Pfizer compared to placebo."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

483,512 次观看 • 2 年前

DR. PAUL THOMAS: “You are MORE likely to die from the VACCINE than from the DISEASE, this is true for EVERY single vaccine on the childhood schedule.” DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: “If mandates were to STOP, these companies would CRASH. And that’s not going to be allowed to happen...” The statistical analysis of each vaccine... The risk of death from Polio is 1 in 1 trillion The risk of death from the Polio vaccine is 1 in 215K The risk of death from Diphtheria is 1 in 42.5 million The risk of death from the Diphtheria vaccine 1 in 76K The risk of death from Tetanus is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the Tetanus Vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Pertussis is 1 in 2.3 million The risk of death from the Pertussis vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Measles is 1 in 106.5 million The risk of death from the Measles vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Mumps is 1 in 40.3 million The risk of death from the Mumps vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Rubella is 1 in 0/negligible The risk of death from the Rubella vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Chickenpox is 1 in 32.3 million The risk of death from Chickenpox vaccine is 1 in 202K The risk of death from Hepatitis-A is 1 in 1.6 million The risk of death from the Hep-A vaccine is 1 in 73K The risk of death from Hepatitis-B is 1 in 305K The risk of death from the Hep-B vaccine is 1 in 96K The risk of death from HIB is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the HIB vaccine is 1 in 46K The risk of death from Pneumonia is 1 in 236K The risk of death from Pneumonia vaccine is 1 in 50K The risk of death from Meningitis is 1 in 822K The risk of death from Meningitis vaccine is 1 in 141K The risk of death from Influenza is 1 in 136K The risk of death from the Influenza Vaccine is 1 in 15K
1:22

DR. PAUL THOMAS: “You are MORE likely to die from the VACCINE than from the DISEASE, this is true for EVERY single vaccine on the childhood schedule.” DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: “If mandates were to STOP, these companies would CRASH. And that’s not going to be allowed to happen...” The statistical analysis of each vaccine... The risk of death from Polio is 1 in 1 trillion The risk of death from the Polio vaccine is 1 in 215K The risk of death from Diphtheria is 1 in 42.5 million The risk of death from the Diphtheria vaccine 1 in 76K The risk of death from Tetanus is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the Tetanus Vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Pertussis is 1 in 2.3 million The risk of death from the Pertussis vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Measles is 1 in 106.5 million The risk of death from the Measles vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Mumps is 1 in 40.3 million The risk of death from the Mumps vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Rubella is 1 in 0/negligible The risk of death from the Rubella vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Chickenpox is 1 in 32.3 million The risk of death from Chickenpox vaccine is 1 in 202K The risk of death from Hepatitis-A is 1 in 1.6 million The risk of death from the Hep-A vaccine is 1 in 73K The risk of death from Hepatitis-B is 1 in 305K The risk of death from the Hep-B vaccine is 1 in 96K The risk of death from HIB is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the HIB vaccine is 1 in 46K The risk of death from Pneumonia is 1 in 236K The risk of death from Pneumonia vaccine is 1 in 50K The risk of death from Meningitis is 1 in 822K The risk of death from Meningitis vaccine is 1 in 141K The risk of death from Influenza is 1 in 136K The risk of death from the Influenza Vaccine is 1 in 15K

Valerie Anne Smith

187,072 次观看 • 23 天前

You know all the so called Conspiracy theories said the Covid Vaccines increased you Cancer Risk? Well Health Canada disclosed in a Pfizer document that there is SV40.
0:52

You know all the so called Conspiracy theories said the Covid Vaccines increased you Cancer Risk? Well Health Canada disclosed in a Pfizer document that there is SV40.

illuminatibot

317,725 次观看 • 1 年前

Former CDC Director under Trump, Dr. Robert Redfield, just said Covid vaccines should not have been mandated. And that Biden and Fauci lied to the American public. “When we looked at the Covid vaccines, which I was part of with Operation Warp Speed, the Covid vaccine should have never been mandated.” “There’s no data to support the concept of mandating that vaccine.” “The vaccine did not prevent transmission.” “Its only important role that we found is that it did prevent serious illness and death for people that were at high risk.” “So the vaccine really never should have been recommended for children.” “When President Biden and Tony Fauci said you need to vaccinate your children so they don’t infect grandma, that wasn’t a truthful statement because the vaccine did not prevent transmission.”
1:14

Former CDC Director under Trump, Dr. Robert Redfield, just said Covid vaccines should not have been mandated. And that Biden and Fauci lied to the American public. “When we looked at the Covid vaccines, which I was part of with Operation Warp Speed, the Covid vaccine should have never been mandated.” “There’s no data to support the concept of mandating that vaccine.” “The vaccine did not prevent transmission.” “Its only important role that we found is that it did prevent serious illness and death for people that were at high risk.” “So the vaccine really never should have been recommended for children.” “When President Biden and Tony Fauci said you need to vaccinate your children so they don’t infect grandma, that wasn’t a truthful statement because the vaccine did not prevent transmission.”

End Tribalism in Politics

75,397 次观看 • 8 个月前

Covid Vaccine Genocide Update… Recipients of the ‘Covid Vaccine’ Pfizer Batch beginning with an ‘E’ (Excess Death Risk) were given batches that were the most lethal. EL0140, EL9261, EL3248, EN9581, EJ1686, EK4176, EK5730, EH9899.
0:26

Covid Vaccine Genocide Update… Recipients of the ‘Covid Vaccine’ Pfizer Batch beginning with an ‘E’ (Excess Death Risk) were given batches that were the most lethal. EL0140, EL9261, EL3248, EN9581, EJ1686, EK4176, EK5730, EH9899.

Liz Churchill

1,429,882 次观看 • 1 年前

Kansas is still suing Pfizer Sen. Blumenthal questions Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach about his case against Pfizer. Kris Koback recently announced "Kansas wins first battle in lawsuit against Pfizer over Covid Vaccine". "A federal judge has granted the State of Kansas’s motion to remand its false advertising lawsuit against Pfizer, Inc. back to state court." “This victory is the first step in bringing justice to the Kansans who were misled by the false statements made by Pfizer regarding the health risks of its COVID vaccine. The case will now proceed in state court" - Kansas AG Kris Kobach Kansas joins Texas, Utah, Mississippi and Louisiana in suing them over various allegations including Misrepresented Efficacy: Falsely claimed the vaccine was highly effective (e.g., 95% efficacy as relative, not absolute, risk reduction) and prevented transmission or protected against variants. Concealed Safety Risks: Hid or downplayed risks like myocarditis, pericarditis, and pregnancy complications, despite internal data showing adverse effects. Deceptive Marketing: Promoted the vaccine as "safe and effective" while omitting critical safety data, misleading consumers. Censorship (Texas-specific): Alleged conspiracy with social media to suppress critics of the vaccine’s efficacy or safety. All at the State level.
0:31

Kansas is still suing Pfizer Sen. Blumenthal questions Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach about his case against Pfizer. Kris Koback recently announced "Kansas wins first battle in lawsuit against Pfizer over Covid Vaccine". "A federal judge has granted the State of Kansas’s motion to remand its false advertising lawsuit against Pfizer, Inc. back to state court." “This victory is the first step in bringing justice to the Kansans who were misled by the false statements made by Pfizer regarding the health risks of its COVID vaccine. The case will now proceed in state court" - Kansas AG Kris Kobach Kansas joins Texas, Utah, Mississippi and Louisiana in suing them over various allegations including Misrepresented Efficacy: Falsely claimed the vaccine was highly effective (e.g., 95% efficacy as relative, not absolute, risk reduction) and prevented transmission or protected against variants. Concealed Safety Risks: Hid or downplayed risks like myocarditis, pericarditis, and pregnancy complications, despite internal data showing adverse effects. Deceptive Marketing: Promoted the vaccine as "safe and effective" while omitting critical safety data, misleading consumers. Censorship (Texas-specific): Alleged conspiracy with social media to suppress critics of the vaccine’s efficacy or safety. All at the State level.

Humanspective

49,927 次观看 • 8 个月前

Amazing speech by Del Bigtree: "I just want to state the obvious, which is just this past week, news headlines described a massive study of 99 million people who received the COVID vaccine. The Daily Mail headline says it all. Largest COVID vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small increased risk of neurological blood and heart disorders. And it adds on to the title but they are still extremely rare. Every article about the study went out of its way to describe the injuries as rare. But what does rare actually mean? First slide. This is the graph that was in the Daily Mail's article. In terms of this study, what they're saying is rare includes a 3.78 times risk of swelling in the brain and spinal cord. This means you are increasing your risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% over someone who didn't get the vaccine. There was also a 2.86 times risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome, which is a paralysis, 6.10 times risk of myocarditis, and a 6.91x risk of pericarditis, swelling of the heart issues. The question no one in the media seems to be asking, I think, is if each of these potential injuries is rare, is it still rare when you add them all together? Take the Moderna vaccine, for example. In the standard three-shot regimen, based on this study, a person is increasing their risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% with the first shot. They're also adding a 348% risk of myocarditis with that same first shot, a 610% increase of myocarditis with the second shot, and another 201% increased risk of myocarditis with the third shot. And these are just the adverse events that were the focus of the study. We're talking about cancer and all sorts of other things that we should be looking at. When the CDC was creating the V-safe app to track the health outcomes of the first 10 million people who received the COVID vaccine, they had a list of adverse events of special interest. These were injuries that the CDC had reason to believe could be caused by the COVID vaccine. That list includes acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, coagulopathy, death, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Kawasaki's disease, multi-system inflammatory disease, narcolepsy, seizures, convulsions, stroke, and transverse myelitis. Now let's just assume that all these issues are rare. And since we know that the rare is currently being described, at least in this study, as anything between a 200% increase to a nearly 700% increased risk, then what is the actual risk when you add all these potential adverse outcomes together? Further still, how high is the risk when you multiply all of these risks by five doses of the COVID vaccine? Are we still in the ballpark of rare? Now imagine multiplying all of these known risks by 72 doses. Now you've just considered the amount of risk that every child is facing with the CDC recommended schedule. The CDC childhood schedule has been the focus of my nonprofit, ICANN's work, since the end of 2016 when it was founded. Through FOIA requests and lawsuits against our regulatory agencies, we've uncovered many inconvenient truths. Perhaps the most significant finding is that none of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule, which are delivered in approximately 72 doses, was ever put through a long-term double-blind placebo-based safety trial prior to licensure. Since this type of trial is really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe. We have skipped the study that would allow you to make that statement scientifically. Most people don't realize that there's a list of known side effects on the information sheet provided with every vaccine that is shipped. Here is just a partial list of printed adverse events for just one of the hepatitis B vaccines and RxB. Here are the side effects. Herpes zoster, meningitis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity syndrome, atheralgia, arthritis, urticaria, erythema multiforme, encephalopathy, swelling of the brain just like the COVID vaccine, multiple sclerosis, neuritis neuritis, hyposthesia, peristhesia, Guillain-Barre syndrome, paralysis, Bell's palsy, optic neuritis, paralysis, paralysis, seizures, syncope, transverse myelitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, tinnitus, vertigo, tachycardia, apnea, bronchospasms, including asthma-like symptoms, dyspepsia, alopecia, angioedema, eczema, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. That's just one vaccine. That vaccine manufacturer has all these side effects in the warning list because why? It is stipulated by the FDA that there is a reasonable belief that they are causally related to the vaccine. That's why they're there. They're not adding them just because they think they should, because they have to. The warning label lists nearly 50 potential side effects, many of them serious, and that is just the first vaccine given to a baby on their first day of life. By the way, the safety study for that hepatitis B vaccine was only four days long. and had no placebo comparator. That is not science, that's insanity. We currently have a lawsuit trying to have that vaccine removed until they do proper safety testing. Every one of the childhood vaccines has a similar list of side effects. And though they are considered rare, how rare is it when you multiply roughly 50 potential side effects 72 times, which is the total number of doses given to a child by the time they're 18. The revelations from the recent study of the COVID vaccine explains what we have been saying for years. Vaccines are not completely safe. And those side effects are rare. What happens when you add them all together? Perhaps it looks like this. Last slide. This is what Brian Hooker is talking about. In the 1980s, when we were giving 11 doses of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was 12.8%. Once we passed the 1986 act, and we had the gold rush of vaccines, it exploded to 53 doses, as I said, 72, that's 53 shots, 72 doses. You watched the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease skyrocketed to 54% of our children. And by the way, that study was finished up in 2011, 2012. We have no idea since then how bad this has gotten. But what you are looking right at there is the greatest decline in public health and human history. Never have we watched that many children in just a few decades have their immune systems start fighting their own bodies and swelling brains. And when you look at the numbers that Brian Hooker just showed you, they match exactly what we're seeing them call rare in this COVID study. Five times rate of neurological disorders. Vax versus unvaxed showing about four times rate of autism in people that got the vaccine compared to those that don't. So it's rare, but it's possible, and it's real. And when we look at those rare numbers stacked up, especially with autism, we're now at one in 45. That's conservative. Many say one in 35 children is being diagnosed with autism. Roughly one in 20 to 24 boys. Is that still rare? Sure, sure, it's just a couple per 100. But what we can never say again after this study and what we all now know is that vaccine injury isn't happening. That's a lie. It is. And we all have a threshold, and we should figure out what that threshold is because millions of children are being injured all around the world. Nothing to see here, right? Nothing to see here."
7:58

Amazing speech by Del Bigtree: "I just want to state the obvious, which is just this past week, news headlines described a massive study of 99 million people who received the COVID vaccine. The Daily Mail headline says it all. Largest COVID vaccine study ever finds shots are linked to small increased risk of neurological blood and heart disorders. And it adds on to the title but they are still extremely rare. Every article about the study went out of its way to describe the injuries as rare. But what does rare actually mean? First slide. This is the graph that was in the Daily Mail's article. In terms of this study, what they're saying is rare includes a 3.78 times risk of swelling in the brain and spinal cord. This means you are increasing your risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% over someone who didn't get the vaccine. There was also a 2.86 times risk of Guillain-Barre syndrome, which is a paralysis, 6.10 times risk of myocarditis, and a 6.91x risk of pericarditis, swelling of the heart issues. The question no one in the media seems to be asking, I think, is if each of these potential injuries is rare, is it still rare when you add them all together? Take the Moderna vaccine, for example. In the standard three-shot regimen, based on this study, a person is increasing their risk of brain and spinal swelling by 378% with the first shot. They're also adding a 348% risk of myocarditis with that same first shot, a 610% increase of myocarditis with the second shot, and another 201% increased risk of myocarditis with the third shot. And these are just the adverse events that were the focus of the study. We're talking about cancer and all sorts of other things that we should be looking at. When the CDC was creating the V-safe app to track the health outcomes of the first 10 million people who received the COVID vaccine, they had a list of adverse events of special interest. These were injuries that the CDC had reason to believe could be caused by the COVID vaccine. That list includes acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, coagulopathy, death, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Kawasaki's disease, multi-system inflammatory disease, narcolepsy, seizures, convulsions, stroke, and transverse myelitis. Now let's just assume that all these issues are rare. And since we know that the rare is currently being described, at least in this study, as anything between a 200% increase to a nearly 700% increased risk, then what is the actual risk when you add all these potential adverse outcomes together? Further still, how high is the risk when you multiply all of these risks by five doses of the COVID vaccine? Are we still in the ballpark of rare? Now imagine multiplying all of these known risks by 72 doses. Now you've just considered the amount of risk that every child is facing with the CDC recommended schedule. The CDC childhood schedule has been the focus of my nonprofit, ICANN's work, since the end of 2016 when it was founded. Through FOIA requests and lawsuits against our regulatory agencies, we've uncovered many inconvenient truths. Perhaps the most significant finding is that none of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC recommended schedule, which are delivered in approximately 72 doses, was ever put through a long-term double-blind placebo-based safety trial prior to licensure. Since this type of trial is really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe. We have skipped the study that would allow you to make that statement scientifically. Most people don't realize that there's a list of known side effects on the information sheet provided with every vaccine that is shipped. Here is just a partial list of printed adverse events for just one of the hepatitis B vaccines and RxB. Here are the side effects. Herpes zoster, meningitis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity syndrome, atheralgia, arthritis, urticaria, erythema multiforme, encephalopathy, swelling of the brain just like the COVID vaccine, multiple sclerosis, neuritis neuritis, hyposthesia, peristhesia, Guillain-Barre syndrome, paralysis, Bell's palsy, optic neuritis, paralysis, paralysis, seizures, syncope, transverse myelitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, tinnitus, vertigo, tachycardia, apnea, bronchospasms, including asthma-like symptoms, dyspepsia, alopecia, angioedema, eczema, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. That's just one vaccine. That vaccine manufacturer has all these side effects in the warning list because why? It is stipulated by the FDA that there is a reasonable belief that they are causally related to the vaccine. That's why they're there. They're not adding them just because they think they should, because they have to. The warning label lists nearly 50 potential side effects, many of them serious, and that is just the first vaccine given to a baby on their first day of life. By the way, the safety study for that hepatitis B vaccine was only four days long. and had no placebo comparator. That is not science, that's insanity. We currently have a lawsuit trying to have that vaccine removed until they do proper safety testing. Every one of the childhood vaccines has a similar list of side effects. And though they are considered rare, how rare is it when you multiply roughly 50 potential side effects 72 times, which is the total number of doses given to a child by the time they're 18. The revelations from the recent study of the COVID vaccine explains what we have been saying for years. Vaccines are not completely safe. And those side effects are rare. What happens when you add them all together? Perhaps it looks like this. Last slide. This is what Brian Hooker is talking about. In the 1980s, when we were giving 11 doses of about three vaccines, the chronic illness rate, which includes neurological and autoimmune disease, was 12.8%. Once we passed the 1986 act, and we had the gold rush of vaccines, it exploded to 53 doses, as I said, 72, that's 53 shots, 72 doses. You watched the chronic illness rate, neurological and autoimmune disease skyrocketed to 54% of our children. And by the way, that study was finished up in 2011, 2012. We have no idea since then how bad this has gotten. But what you are looking right at there is the greatest decline in public health and human history. Never have we watched that many children in just a few decades have their immune systems start fighting their own bodies and swelling brains. And when you look at the numbers that Brian Hooker just showed you, they match exactly what we're seeing them call rare in this COVID study. Five times rate of neurological disorders. Vax versus unvaxed showing about four times rate of autism in people that got the vaccine compared to those that don't. So it's rare, but it's possible, and it's real. And when we look at those rare numbers stacked up, especially with autism, we're now at one in 45. That's conservative. Many say one in 35 children is being diagnosed with autism. Roughly one in 20 to 24 boys. Is that still rare? Sure, sure, it's just a couple per 100. But what we can never say again after this study and what we all now know is that vaccine injury isn't happening. That's a lie. It is. And we all have a threshold, and we should figure out what that threshold is because millions of children are being injured all around the world. Nothing to see here, right? Nothing to see here."

Camus

682,937 次观看 • 1 年前

NEW: Sen. Rand Paul Confronts Moderna CEO About the Risk of Myocarditis in Young Males Paul: "You're saying that for ages 16 to 24, among males who take the COVID vaccine, their risk of myocarditis is less than people who get the disease?" Bancel: "That is my understanding —" Paul: "That is not true. And I'd like to enter into the record six peer-reviewed papers ... that say the complete opposite of what you say. I also spoke with your president just last week, and he readily acknowledged in private that, yes, there is an increased risk of myocarditis. The fact that you can't say in public is quite disturbing."
5:24

NEW: Sen. Rand Paul Confronts Moderna CEO About the Risk of Myocarditis in Young Males Paul: "You're saying that for ages 16 to 24, among males who take the COVID vaccine, their risk of myocarditis is less than people who get the disease?" Bancel: "That is my understanding —" Paul: "That is not true. And I'd like to enter into the record six peer-reviewed papers ... that say the complete opposite of what you say. I also spoke with your president just last week, and he readily acknowledged in private that, yes, there is an increased risk of myocarditis. The fact that you can't say in public is quite disturbing."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,815,444 次观看 • 3 年前