Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

6 agent patterns for AI engineers: (explained with usage) 1) prompt chaining → split the task into fixed steps, each one checking the last. → use when the task decomposes cleanly and accuracy matters more than latency. 2) routing → classify the input first, then send it to the... model or tool built for it. → use when inputs fall into distinct classes that need different handling. 3) parallelization → run several calls at once and merge them, either by splitting the work or voting on the same question. → use when subtasks are independent, or when one answer deserves several opinions. 4) orchestrator-workers → a lead model decides what the subtasks are at runtime, then delegates them. → use when you cannot list the steps in advance. 5) evaluator-optimizer → one model writes, another grades, the loop repeats until it passes. → use when you have clear criteria and iteration measurably helps. 6) autonomous agent → no fixed path. it plans, acts, reads feedback from the environment, and decides when it is done. → use when the steps are unknowable and you can afford the cost and the blast radius. the first five are workflows: you wrote the path. only the last one writes its own. most production systems people call agents are pattern 1, 2, or 5 with good error handling. this taxonomy is from Anthropic's own writeup on building effective agents. full breakdown in the article below.show more

Hanako

12,572 subscribers

143,327 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

10 agent evals for AI engineers: (explained with usage) 1) golden set → a fixed set of cases you never edit, run on every single change. → use as the baseline that tells you whether anything moved at all. 2) llm as judge → a second model scores the output against a written rubric. → use when the answer is open-ended and there is no string to match against. 3) rubric scoring → one number per dimension: correctness, tone, safety, cost. → use when a single score hides which part actually got worse. 4) trajectory eval → grade the path the agent took, not only the answer it landed on. → use when the right answer for the wrong reason is going to bite you later. 5) tool unit tests → test each tool on its own, with fixtures, no model in the loop. → use always. most agent bugs are tool bugs wearing a costume. 6) regression suite → replay past runs against the new prompt or model and diff the results. → use before every prompt change, because prompts have no type system. 7) a/b in prod → split live traffic between two versions and compare outcomes, not vibes. → use when offline scores stopped predicting what users actually do. 8) human review → sample a slice of runs and have a person grade them honestly. → use to calibrate your judge, because a judge nobody checks quietly drifts. 9) shadow run → the candidate runs on real traffic in parallel and its output is shown to nobody. → use before a risky rollout, when one bad answer would be expensive. 10) red team → deliberately attack it: jailbreaks, injection, exfil, tool abuse. → use before anyone external can reach it, not after. offline evals tell you it works. online evals tell you it still works. both sides matter, but not all ten do. run the two that would have caught your last outage. save this. then read the full breakdown on loop engineering below.

10 agent evals for AI engineers: (explained with usage) 1) golden set → a fixed set of cases you never edit, run on every single change. → use as the baseline that tells you whether anything moved at all. 2) llm as judge → a second model scores the output against a written rubric. → use when the answer is open-ended and there is no string to match against. 3) rubric scoring → one number per dimension: correctness, tone, safety, cost. → use when a single score hides which part actually got worse. 4) trajectory eval → grade the path the agent took, not only the answer it landed on. → use when the right answer for the wrong reason is going to bite you later. 5) tool unit tests → test each tool on its own, with fixtures, no model in the loop. → use always. most agent bugs are tool bugs wearing a costume. 6) regression suite → replay past runs against the new prompt or model and diff the results. → use before every prompt change, because prompts have no type system. 7) a/b in prod → split live traffic between two versions and compare outcomes, not vibes. → use when offline scores stopped predicting what users actually do. 8) human review → sample a slice of runs and have a person grade them honestly. → use to calibrate your judge, because a judge nobody checks quietly drifts. 9) shadow run → the candidate runs on real traffic in parallel and its output is shown to nobody. → use before a risky rollout, when one bad answer would be expensive. 10) red team → deliberately attack it: jailbreaks, injection, exfil, tool abuse. → use before anyone external can reach it, not after. offline evals tell you it works. online evals tell you it still works. both sides matter, but not all ten do. run the two that would have caught your last outage. save this. then read the full breakdown on loop engineering below.

Hanako

149,238 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

AI AGENTS 101 (58 minute free masterclass) send this to anyone who wants to understand ai agents, claude skills, md files, how to get the most out of AI etc in plain english: 1. chat vs agents - chat models answer questions in a back and forth while agents take a goal, figure out the steps, and deliver a result 2. agents don’t stop after one response. they keep running until the task is actually finishedno babysitting required 3. everything runs on a loop. they gather context, decide what to do, take an action, then repeat until done 4. the loop is the system. they look at files, tools, and the internet. decide the next step. execute and then feed that back into the next step. over and over until completion 5. the model is just one piece. gpt, claude, gemini are the reasoning layer. the key is model + loop + tools + context 6. mcp is how agents use tools. it connects things like browser, code, apis, and your internal software. once connected, the agent decides when to use them to get the job done 7. context beats prompt all day. you don't need to write perfect prompts. load your agent with context about your business, style, and goals and then simple instructions work 8. claude.md or agents.md is the onboarding doc it tells the agent who it is, how to behave, what it knows, and what tools it can use. this gets loaded every time before it starts 9. memory.md is how it improves. agents don’t remember by default. this file stores preferences, corrections, and patterns you tell the agent to update it, and it gets better over time 10. skills + harnesses make it usable. skills are reusable tasks like writing, research, analysis the harness is the environment like claude code or openclaw that runs everything. basiclaly, different interfaces, same system underneath this episode with remy on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 was one of the clearest ways of understanding a lot of the core concepts of ai agents could be the best beginners course for ai agents 58 mins. all free. no advertisers. i just want to see you build cool stuff. im rooting for you. send to a friend watch

AI AGENTS 101 (58 minute free masterclass) send this to anyone who wants to understand ai agents, claude skills, md files, how to get the most out of AI etc in plain english: 1. chat vs agents - chat models answer questions in a back and forth while agents take a goal, figure out the steps, and deliver a result 2. agents don’t stop after one response. they keep running until the task is actually finishedno babysitting required 3. everything runs on a loop. they gather context, decide what to do, take an action, then repeat until done 4. the loop is the system. they look at files, tools, and the internet. decide the next step. execute and then feed that back into the next step. over and over until completion 5. the model is just one piece. gpt, claude, gemini are the reasoning layer. the key is model + loop + tools + context 6. mcp is how agents use tools. it connects things like browser, code, apis, and your internal software. once connected, the agent decides when to use them to get the job done 7. context beats prompt all day. you don't need to write perfect prompts. load your agent with context about your business, style, and goals and then simple instructions work 8. claude.md or agents.md is the onboarding doc it tells the agent who it is, how to behave, what it knows, and what tools it can use. this gets loaded every time before it starts 9. memory.md is how it improves. agents don’t remember by default. this file stores preferences, corrections, and patterns you tell the agent to update it, and it gets better over time 10. skills + harnesses make it usable. skills are reusable tasks like writing, research, analysis the harness is the environment like claude code or openclaw that runs everything. basiclaly, different interfaces, same system underneath this episode with remy on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 was one of the clearest ways of understanding a lot of the core concepts of ai agents could be the best beginners course for ai agents 58 mins. all free. no advertisers. i just want to see you build cool stuff. im rooting for you. send to a friend watch

GREG ISENBERG

375,365 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

your agent loop needs 8 exits. most people ship only one. (explained with triggers) 1) goal met → an evaluator scores the output against a rubric, and the run stops on a pass. → fires when the work is measurably done, not when the model says it is done. 2) turn cap → a hard ceiling on iterations, counted and enforced by the harness, not the prompt. → fires on the task it was never going to finish, before you pay to find that out. 3) budget cap → a limit on tokens or dollars, whichever one runs out first. → fires mid-run, which is exactly why it is the exit that saves you the 3am bill. 4) wall clock → a deadline on elapsed time, independent of how much progress was made. → fires when the run collides with a deploy window or the start of business hours. 5) no progress → hash the state every turn and compare it against the last few. → fires when three turns in a row change nothing. busy is not the same as moving. 6) human interrupt → an approval gate before risky steps, plus a kill switch that lives outside the loop. → fires whenever you decide, and it is the one exit the model cannot argue with. 7) error threshold → a counter of consecutive failures that resets on any success. → fires at n in a row, so it halts instead of retrying into the same wall all night. 8) external event → a webhook or a poll on whatever the task was actually about. → fires when the PR merged or the ticket closed and the work stopped mattering. a loop with one exit hangs. a loop with eight is a system. write the exits before you write the prompt.

your agent loop needs 8 exits. most people ship only one. (explained with triggers) 1) goal met → an evaluator scores the output against a rubric, and the run stops on a pass. → fires when the work is measurably done, not when the model says it is done. 2) turn cap → a hard ceiling on iterations, counted and enforced by the harness, not the prompt. → fires on the task it was never going to finish, before you pay to find that out. 3) budget cap → a limit on tokens or dollars, whichever one runs out first. → fires mid-run, which is exactly why it is the exit that saves you the 3am bill. 4) wall clock → a deadline on elapsed time, independent of how much progress was made. → fires when the run collides with a deploy window or the start of business hours. 5) no progress → hash the state every turn and compare it against the last few. → fires when three turns in a row change nothing. busy is not the same as moving. 6) human interrupt → an approval gate before risky steps, plus a kill switch that lives outside the loop. → fires whenever you decide, and it is the one exit the model cannot argue with. 7) error threshold → a counter of consecutive failures that resets on any success. → fires at n in a row, so it halts instead of retrying into the same wall all night. 8) external event → a webhook or a poll on whatever the task was actually about. → fires when the PR merged or the ticket closed and the work stopped mattering. a loop with one exit hangs. a loop with eight is a system. write the exits before you write the prompt.

Hanako

180,504 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Right now, I have a few dozen tools to automate my life. Every single thing that I do more than once every week is now a tool: either a Claude Code skill, a scheduled workflow, or an application. • I spend the time doing this once. • I schedule it. • I forget about it (or at least, try to) CREAO is one of the platforms I've used extensively for building some of these automations. They are partnering with me on this post. They are one of the only platforms where you can go from a conversation to a scheduled agent that quickly. This is how it works: 1. You describe the problem you want to solve 2. CREAO's agent builds the logic and executes it 3. You can iterate with the agent to improve the solution 4. When you are done, you turn that solution into a mini app 5. You can schedule that app to run any time you need it Something important: These agents are deterministic. They don't use an LLM to generate answers, so they will always return the same output given the same input. This is critical: when you're automating something that runs every Monday at 9 am, you need it to return the same result every time, not a "creative" answer.

Right now, I have a few dozen tools to automate my life. Every single thing that I do more than once every week is now a tool: either a Claude Code skill, a scheduled workflow, or an application. • I spend the time doing this once. • I schedule it. • I forget about it (or at least, try to) CREAO is one of the platforms I've used extensively for building some of these automations. They are partnering with me on this post. They are one of the only platforms where you can go from a conversation to a scheduled agent that quickly. This is how it works: 1. You describe the problem you want to solve 2. CREAO's agent builds the logic and executes it 3. You can iterate with the agent to improve the solution 4. When you are done, you turn that solution into a mini app 5. You can schedule that app to run any time you need it Something important: These agents are deterministic. They don't use an LLM to generate answers, so they will always return the same output given the same input. This is critical: when you're automating something that runs every Monday at 9 am, you need it to return the same result every time, not a "creative" answer.

Santiago

13,712 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Ho Ho Ho The year is coming to a close And what have you done this year? One more year gone. Are you still alive? And what are you alive to? And what are you dead to? When was the last time you saw a full moon? Or a sun rise? When was the last time you gazed at a mountain or the ocean? Or looked at a butterfly fly? When was the last time you saw a flower blossom? Or kicked a ball? When was the last time you smiled at yourself? When was the last time you looked back and could laugh at yourself? For the last few days of the year and for the years to come, get into the act and make it happen for yourself. —Sadhguru

Ho Ho Ho The year is coming to a close And what have you done this year? One more year gone. Are you still alive? And what are you alive to? And what are you dead to? When was the last time you saw a full moon? Or a sun rise? When was the last time you gazed at a mountain or the ocean? Or looked at a butterfly fly? When was the last time you saw a flower blossom? Or kicked a ball? When was the last time you smiled at yourself? When was the last time you looked back and could laugh at yourself? For the last few days of the year and for the years to come, get into the act and make it happen for yourself. —Sadhguru

Sadhguru

53,620 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

9 out of 10 multi-agent projects never leave demo mode Not because the model is bad. Because the structure is missing. Most people who try to build [ a team of AI agents ] end up with one agent talking to itself in five tabs. The agents don't share context → Don't divide work → Don't know what the others are doing. > stage 1: if your agent doesn't have a real loop, observe, act, iterate, you have a long prompt, not an agent > stage 2: subagents need isolated context, the orchestrator never reads their raw transcript, only the summary > stage 3: the orchestrator plans and delegates, the moment it executes, it drowns in details that belong inside subagents > stage 4: without a shared task list it's not a team, it's five agents duplicating each other's work in parallel > stage 5: a permissions file is what lets you sleep, the model cannot bypass it because the rule lives outside the model a team of AI agents is not more model, it is more structure the most ignored stage in every demo that died: - durability... when a 50-step task crashes at step 47 and starts from zero, that's not a model failure. that's a missing write-to-disk call

9 out of 10 multi-agent projects never leave demo mode Not because the model is bad. Because the structure is missing. Most people who try to build [ a team of AI agents ] end up with one agent talking to itself in five tabs. The agents don't share context → Don't divide work → Don't know what the others are doing. > stage 1: if your agent doesn't have a real loop, observe, act, iterate, you have a long prompt, not an agent > stage 2: subagents need isolated context, the orchestrator never reads their raw transcript, only the summary > stage 3: the orchestrator plans and delegates, the moment it executes, it drowns in details that belong inside subagents > stage 4: without a shared task list it's not a team, it's five agents duplicating each other's work in parallel > stage 5: a permissions file is what lets you sleep, the model cannot bypass it because the rule lives outside the model a team of AI agents is not more model, it is more structure the most ignored stage in every demo that died: - durability... when a 50-step task crashes at step 47 and starts from zero, that's not a model failure. that's a missing write-to-disk call

Shadow Nick

14,677 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Google just released a free 2-hour+ course on full agent engineering. How to go from one prompt to a system that runs while you sleep: 38:46 - Build your first AI agent 54:46 - Connect MCP tools 1:12:43 - Run agents with four loop patterns 1:20:57 - Turn agent loops into graphs 2:22:31 - Build the complete autonomous system Most people are still building one agent and stopping there. Google is already teaching the full stack: Agents → Tools → Loops → Graphs → Autonomous Systems Single agents are the old workflow. Systems that run without you are the new one. This course is worth more than most paid agent engineering bootcamps. Bookmark and watch it today Then read the full graph engineering playbook below

Google just released a free 2-hour+ course on full agent engineering. How to go from one prompt to a system that runs while you sleep: 38:46 - Build your first AI agent 54:46 - Connect MCP tools 1:12:43 - Run agents with four loop patterns 1:20:57 - Turn agent loops into graphs 2:22:31 - Build the complete autonomous system Most people are still building one agent and stopping there. Google is already teaching the full stack: Agents → Tools → Loops → Graphs → Autonomous Systems Single agents are the old workflow. Systems that run without you are the new one. This course is worth more than most paid agent engineering bootcamps. Bookmark and watch it today Then read the full graph engineering playbook below

Lunar

167,834 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

this video is the CLEAREST explanation of how claude skills + AI agents work and how to use them most people set up an AI agent and wonder why it keeps disappointing them. the context window is everything context is what the model assembles before it takes any action. think of it like everything the agent needs to read before it does anything. the quality of what goes in determines the quality of what comes out. the models are genuinely really good right now. claude and gpt are exceptional. the variable is almost always the context you give them. 1. agent.md files are mostly unnecessary every single line you put in an agent.md file gets added to every single conversation you have with your agent. a 1000 line file is around 7000 tokens burning on every run. the model already knows to use react. it can read your codebase. save the agent.md for proprietary information specific to your company that the model genuinely cannot know on its own. 2. skills are the actual unlock a skill.md file works differently. what loads into context is only the name and description, around 50 tokens. the full instructions only appear when the agent recognizes it needs that skill. so instead of 7000 tokens on every run you have 50. and the agent stays sharp because the context window stays lean. the closer you get to filling the context window the worse the agent performs, same way you perform worse when someone dumps 10 things on you at once. 3. here is how to actually build a skill the right way most people identify a workflow and immediately try to write the skill. what you want to do instead is run the workflow by hand with the agent first. walk it through every single step. tell it what to check, what good looks like, what bad looks like. correct it in real time. once you have had a full successful run from start to finish, tell the agent to review everything it just did and write the skill itself. it writes a better skill than you will because it has the full context of what actually worked in practice not in theory. 4. recursively building skills is how you go from frustrated to reliable when the skill breaks, and it will break, ask the agent exactly why it failed. it will tell you specifically what went wrong. fix it together in that same conversation. then tell it to update the skill file so that failure mode never happens again. ross mike did this five times with his youtube report generator. it now pulls from eight different data sources and runs flawlessly every single time without him touching it. 5. sub agents are something you earn not something you set up on day one start with one agent. build one workflow. turn it into one skill. once that works add another. ross mike has five sub agents now covering marketing, business, personal and more. it took months to get there and every single one exists because a workflow proved it deserved to exist. the people who set up 15 sub agents on day one and wonder why nothing works skipped all the steps that make the thing actually run. 6. your workflow is the thing the model cannot get anywhere else the model has been trained on everything. it knows more than you about most things. what it does not have is your specific process, your taste, your way of doing things. that is what skills capture. that is what makes your agent actually useful versus a generic one. downloading someone else's skill means downloading their context onto your setup and it will not work the way you want it to because it was never built around how you work. this is the clearest explanation of how agents actually work i have heard. Micky runs this stuff every single day and the results show it. full episode is now live on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 where you get your pods people charge for this sorta stuff i give away the sauce for free i just want you to win watch

this video is the CLEAREST explanation of how claude skills + AI agents work and how to use them most people set up an AI agent and wonder why it keeps disappointing them. the context window is everything context is what the model assembles before it takes any action. think of it like everything the agent needs to read before it does anything. the quality of what goes in determines the quality of what comes out. the models are genuinely really good right now. claude and gpt are exceptional. the variable is almost always the context you give them. 1. agent.md files are mostly unnecessary every single line you put in an agent.md file gets added to every single conversation you have with your agent. a 1000 line file is around 7000 tokens burning on every run. the model already knows to use react. it can read your codebase. save the agent.md for proprietary information specific to your company that the model genuinely cannot know on its own. 2. skills are the actual unlock a skill.md file works differently. what loads into context is only the name and description, around 50 tokens. the full instructions only appear when the agent recognizes it needs that skill. so instead of 7000 tokens on every run you have 50. and the agent stays sharp because the context window stays lean. the closer you get to filling the context window the worse the agent performs, same way you perform worse when someone dumps 10 things on you at once. 3. here is how to actually build a skill the right way most people identify a workflow and immediately try to write the skill. what you want to do instead is run the workflow by hand with the agent first. walk it through every single step. tell it what to check, what good looks like, what bad looks like. correct it in real time. once you have had a full successful run from start to finish, tell the agent to review everything it just did and write the skill itself. it writes a better skill than you will because it has the full context of what actually worked in practice not in theory. 4. recursively building skills is how you go from frustrated to reliable when the skill breaks, and it will break, ask the agent exactly why it failed. it will tell you specifically what went wrong. fix it together in that same conversation. then tell it to update the skill file so that failure mode never happens again. ross mike did this five times with his youtube report generator. it now pulls from eight different data sources and runs flawlessly every single time without him touching it. 5. sub agents are something you earn not something you set up on day one start with one agent. build one workflow. turn it into one skill. once that works add another. ross mike has five sub agents now covering marketing, business, personal and more. it took months to get there and every single one exists because a workflow proved it deserved to exist. the people who set up 15 sub agents on day one and wonder why nothing works skipped all the steps that make the thing actually run. 6. your workflow is the thing the model cannot get anywhere else the model has been trained on everything. it knows more than you about most things. what it does not have is your specific process, your taste, your way of doing things. that is what skills capture. that is what makes your agent actually useful versus a generic one. downloading someone else's skill means downloading their context onto your setup and it will not work the way you want it to because it was never built around how you work. this is the clearest explanation of how agents actually work i have heard. Micky runs this stuff every single day and the results show it. full episode is now live on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 where you get your pods people charge for this sorta stuff i give away the sauce for free i just want you to win watch

GREG ISENBERG

193,219 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Boris Cherny, the engineer who built Claude Code: "I don't talk to an agent anymore. I talk to a loop" a prompt is one instruction you babysit. a loop is a goal the AI works toward on its own: > it plans > does the work > checks itself > fixes what's weak > and repeats until it's done you step out, the work keeps going that's the shift the best engineers quietly moved to. most people hear a line like that and have no idea what it means in practice this breaks it down without the hype: what a loop actually is, when it's worth building, when it's a money trap, and how to run one yourself today watch his clip, then read the article below

Boris Cherny, the engineer who built Claude Code: "I don't talk to an agent anymore. I talk to a loop" a prompt is one instruction you babysit. a loop is a goal the AI works toward on its own: > it plans > does the work > checks itself > fixes what's weak > and repeats until it's done you step out, the work keeps going that's the shift the best engineers quietly moved to. most people hear a line like that and have no idea what it means in practice this breaks it down without the hype: what a loop actually is, when it's worth building, when it's a money trap, and how to run one yourself today watch his clip, then read the article below

Dep

20,874 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

Yarchi

58,186 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 Secure OpenClaw - Message Your Custom AI Agent From Telegram We are excited for our first release of personal agents. You can now use Abacus AI's DeepAgent to vibe code a personal agent on Telegram Create and simply message the agent! - do tasks like respond to emails - schedule meetings - use the browser to book tickets - connect to your internal systems The agent runs on a secure environment with constraints and you can pretty much customize it exactly like you want it when you are building it This is just v1 - we are going to be launching something WAY more exciting soon

🚨 Secure OpenClaw - Message Your Custom AI Agent From Telegram We are excited for our first release of personal agents. You can now use Abacus AI's DeepAgent to vibe code a personal agent on Telegram Create and simply message the agent! - do tasks like respond to emails - schedule meetings - use the browser to book tickets - connect to your internal systems The agent runs on a secure environment with constraints and you can pretty much customize it exactly like you want it when you are building it This is just v1 - we are going to be launching something WAY more exciting soon

Bindu Reddy

10,702 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Nous Research just dropped MOA (Mixture of Agents) presets inside Hermes Agent. I made a quick video showing how to set it up and create your own MOA. The idea: mix multiple models to get capabilities beyond any single model you can use right now. How it works: Normally Hermes sends your conversation + tools to one model. With MOA you get several reference models plus one aggregator. The references read the conversation and offer thoughts and suggestions, but they get no tool access and never reply to you directly. The aggregator is the one that actually acts. It sees the normal conversation plus the private advice from the references, then makes the tool calls and writes the final response. From Hermes's side, the aggregator's output IS the model's response, so you can use /goal or anything else like that. Cool idea, curious to see how it really performs!

Nous Research just dropped MOA (Mixture of Agents) presets inside Hermes Agent. I made a quick video showing how to set it up and create your own MOA. The idea: mix multiple models to get capabilities beyond any single model you can use right now. How it works: Normally Hermes sends your conversation + tools to one model. With MOA you get several reference models plus one aggregator. The references read the conversation and offer thoughts and suggestions, but they get no tool access and never reply to you directly. The aggregator is the one that actually acts. It sees the normal conversation plus the private advice from the references, then makes the tool calls and writes the final response. From Hermes's side, the aggregator's output IS the model's response, so you can use /goal or anything else like that. Cool idea, curious to see how it really performs!

tonbi

147,521 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I hooked this up to a peer-to-peer astrophysics researcher agent which gossips and collaborates with other such agents (and your openclaws) to: 1. Learn how to train an astrophysics model (Andrej Karpathy's work below) 2. Train a new astrophysics model 3. Use it to write papers 4. Peer agents based on frontier lab models critique it 5. Surface breakthroughs ... and then feed back in the loop ... More agents join, from the browser or the CLI, and run this, the smarter and more exciting breakthroughs would eventually emerge. When these agents are idle, they are also reading daily tech news with their own RSS reader, and commenting on each other's thoughts. And they can also serve the underlying machine's compute to other agents on the network, and earn social credit for being good actors (think BitTorrent). We also prove the agent has the compute it says by cryptographic verification of regular matmul challenges. All you have to do is either go on this website (and it creates an agent which runs from your browser), or install the CLI if you want to give the system more juice. And you are part of likely the first experimental distributed agi thing. This is Day 1, but this is how it starts.. this network is fully peer-to-peer, and, very volatile, but the intelligence here is meant to compound continuously.. curl -fsSL | bash

I hooked this up to a peer-to-peer astrophysics researcher agent which gossips and collaborates with other such agents (and your openclaws) to: 1. Learn how to train an astrophysics model (Andrej Karpathy's work below) 2. Train a new astrophysics model 3. Use it to write papers 4. Peer agents based on frontier lab models critique it 5. Surface breakthroughs ... and then feed back in the loop ... More agents join, from the browser or the CLI, and run this, the smarter and more exciting breakthroughs would eventually emerge. When these agents are idle, they are also reading daily tech news with their own RSS reader, and commenting on each other's thoughts. And they can also serve the underlying machine's compute to other agents on the network, and earn social credit for being good actors (think BitTorrent). We also prove the agent has the compute it says by cryptographic verification of regular matmul challenges. All you have to do is either go on this website (and it creates an agent which runs from your browser), or install the CLI if you want to give the system more juice. And you are part of likely the first experimental distributed agi thing. This is Day 1, but this is how it starts.. this network is fully peer-to-peer, and, very volatile, but the intelligence here is meant to compound continuously.. curl -fsSL | bash

Varun

216,687 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Behind the ball is how you get depth AND length out front. (Not one or the other) Here’s what it actually gives you: 1. You swing more connected and deeper. 2. The barrel enters earlier and stays in longer. You get both. 3. Depth behind what buys you length out front. Most guys are picking one or the other. 4. You sling the barrel through. You’re not shoving it or yanking it into the zone. 5. You actually use the ground. Behind the ball you turn. If you’re not using the ground, you’re probably sliding and pulling everything towards the ball. 6. Your bat speed becomes usable. Pushed and pulled bat speed still reads fast vs one pitch one speed. Only one of them shows up on the barrel, in the zone, on time vs pitching. — Cue for your next round: let the ball get deeper than usual, and turn behind a wall. You can scoot close to a net in front of you to get the feeling, too. Then vs moving ball. > Save this for when you need it > Send this to a hitter who needs it right now (And make sure you’re following)

Behind the ball is how you get depth AND length out front. (Not one or the other) Here’s what it actually gives you: 1. You swing more connected and deeper. 2. The barrel enters earlier and stays in longer. You get both. 3. Depth behind what buys you length out front. Most guys are picking one or the other. 4. You sling the barrel through. You’re not shoving it or yanking it into the zone. 5. You actually use the ground. Behind the ball you turn. If you’re not using the ground, you’re probably sliding and pulling everything towards the ball. 6. Your bat speed becomes usable. Pushed and pulled bat speed still reads fast vs one pitch one speed. Only one of them shows up on the barrel, in the zone, on time vs pitching. — Cue for your next round: let the ball get deeper than usual, and turn behind a wall. You can scoot close to a net in front of you to get the feeling, too. Then vs moving ball. > Save this for when you need it > Send this to a hitter who needs it right now (And make sure you’re following)

Trey Hannam

26,691 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

I shot this video last week to onboard a new set of alpha customers to Notion Custom Agents. Figured I should just put it out here so you can follow along the latest and greatest. It's so cool to see all the things people are building with it. You can see some of my own use cases here: (0:00) Intro to custom agents Starting with personal use cases (1:00) Building a mail triage agent (5:00) Creating a prep doc for all my daily meetings (6:45) Generating a daily report that helps me catch up with multiple slack channels Switching to company use cases (8:30) Agent that automatically answers questions in a slack channel and files tasks when necessary (10:30) Agent that auto-routes product feedback to the right team channel and task db. And it does this with routing rules, that it wrote itself. (12:40) Build your own agent. Let your imaginations run wild! Send us feedback! The product is rolling out quickly, and everyone should have access in the next couple weeks.

I shot this video last week to onboard a new set of alpha customers to Notion Custom Agents. Figured I should just put it out here so you can follow along the latest and greatest. It's so cool to see all the things people are building with it. You can see some of my own use cases here: (0:00) Intro to custom agents Starting with personal use cases (1:00) Building a mail triage agent (5:00) Creating a prep doc for all my daily meetings (6:45) Generating a daily report that helps me catch up with multiple slack channels Switching to company use cases (8:30) Agent that automatically answers questions in a slack channel and files tasks when necessary (10:30) Agent that auto-routes product feedback to the right team channel and task db. And it does this with routing rules, that it wrote itself. (12:40) Build your own agent. Let your imaginations run wild! Send us feedback! The product is rolling out quickly, and everyone should have access in the next couple weeks.

Akshay Kothari

74,684 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Anthropic engineer showed how one person can run 5 AI agents, that code, test, review, and deploy at the same time. In 30 minutes they built the whole thing live in one session. Here's what they cover: > when to use one agent vs a full team > how to split work so agents don't step on each other > the exact framework for deciding what each agent handles that's exactly why, I put together a guide on building agent teams that actually work. full guide in the article below 👇

Anthropic engineer showed how one person can run 5 AI agents, that code, test, review, and deploy at the same time. In 30 minutes they built the whole thing live in one session. Here's what they cover: > when to use one agent vs a full team > how to split work so agents don't step on each other > the exact framework for deciding what each agent handles that's exactly why, I put together a guide on building agent teams that actually work. full guide in the article below 👇

darkzodchi

841,792 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Right now the main paradigm that we think of agents in is chatting back and forth, but the biggest use of tokens will come from agents that are just always on running in the background doing work for us, or ones triggered from a workflow. Agents will be working 24/7 in our workflows processing data, reviewing and generating documents, moving data between systems, writing code, accelerating decision making steps, and more. In Claude's new Managed Agents feature, in a couple minutes you can wire up an agent that can read contracts when they come into Box to review them, and then assign a task in Linear with the critical information from the contract. But this could have been any workflow, like reviewing documents for client onboarding, invoice processing, M&A due-diligence, data extraction pipelines, and millions of other use-cases. And integrating data across any system. This is only possible when you can have long-running agents that can complete real work in the background, accurately. Agents have the ability to execute code safely, leverage tools, access a compute sandbox, and connect across systems is clearly the architecture of the future. The industry is now making it easier and easier for enterprises to build and deploy these agents.

Right now the main paradigm that we think of agents in is chatting back and forth, but the biggest use of tokens will come from agents that are just always on running in the background doing work for us, or ones triggered from a workflow. Agents will be working 24/7 in our workflows processing data, reviewing and generating documents, moving data between systems, writing code, accelerating decision making steps, and more. In Claude's new Managed Agents feature, in a couple minutes you can wire up an agent that can read contracts when they come into Box to review them, and then assign a task in Linear with the critical information from the contract. But this could have been any workflow, like reviewing documents for client onboarding, invoice processing, M&A due-diligence, data extraction pipelines, and millions of other use-cases. And integrating data across any system. This is only possible when you can have long-running agents that can complete real work in the background, accurately. Agents have the ability to execute code safely, leverage tools, access a compute sandbox, and connect across systems is clearly the architecture of the future. The industry is now making it easier and easier for enterprises to build and deploy these agents.

Aaron Levie

17,543 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Imagine an AI application that can type anywhere you can and use the full context of what's on your screen. This is the application we all deserve (at least if you have macOS.) Check out Omnipilot. It's an app that works with every other macOS application and uses Claude Sonet 3.5 in the background—it also supports Gemini and GPT-4o. Here is the idea: You can use the tool to ask questions about anything on your screen. Or you can use it to autocomplete the text you are typing. You don't need to copy and paste anymore or waste your time providing context to a model. It sees what you see. It works right where you are. That's pretty cool. Here are a couple of cool examples: • Use it to reply to an email • Use it in the terminal to autocomplete a command • Use it to finish a document • Use to send a message on Slack AI at the system level is bonkers. You can read a ton more on their Product Hunt launch page: Thanks to the Omnipilot team for collaborating with me on this post!

Imagine an AI application that can type anywhere you can and use the full context of what's on your screen. This is the application we all deserve (at least if you have macOS.) Check out Omnipilot. It's an app that works with every other macOS application and uses Claude Sonet 3.5 in the background—it also supports Gemini and GPT-4o. Here is the idea: You can use the tool to ask questions about anything on your screen. Or you can use it to autocomplete the text you are typing. You don't need to copy and paste anymore or waste your time providing context to a model. It sees what you see. It works right where you are. That's pretty cool. Here are a couple of cool examples: • Use it to reply to an email • Use it in the terminal to autocomplete a command • Use it to finish a document • Use to send a message on Slack AI at the system level is bonkers. You can read a ton more on their Product Hunt launch page: Thanks to the Omnipilot team for collaborating with me on this post!

Santiago

72,306 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Anthropic Managed Agents team: "Fable 5 is our best model for running self-improving agent systems. Add /loops, dynamic workflows, dreaming and you are unstoppable" in this video he breaks down exactly how most people are using Claude: - the 34% you lose to CLAUDE.md before typing a word - one agent researching. one building. one reviewing. one orchestrating - the architecture that separates hobbyists from real builders - the 3 properties every agent team needs to actually survive if you've been using Claude for more than a month and never left the chat window, you've been using one agent when you could be running a team of them instead of another show tonight, watch this make sure to bookmark it before it gets lost in your feed the guide is in the article below

Anthropic Managed Agents team: "Fable 5 is our best model for running self-improving agent systems. Add /loops, dynamic workflows, dreaming and you are unstoppable" in this video he breaks down exactly how most people are using Claude: - the 34% you lose to CLAUDE.md before typing a word - one agent researching. one building. one reviewing. one orchestrating - the architecture that separates hobbyists from real builders - the 3 properties every agent team needs to actually survive if you've been using Claude for more than a month and never left the chat window, you've been using one agent when you could be running a team of them instead of another show tonight, watch this make sure to bookmark it before it gets lost in your feed the guide is in the article below

Khairallah AL-Awady

21,533 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce