正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

GRAPH ENGINEERING: STOP ADDING AGENTS AND START DESIGNING SYSTEMS More agents won’t save you if every step depends on the previous one Graph Engineering forces the better question “Where does the work naturally split? When it does, parallel researchers + independent verifiers + a final merge consistently outperform one...

13,768 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

15 条评论

ALEXYZ 的头像
ALEXYZ2 个月前

Parallel verification is the real systems breakthrough.

Shashank Shekhar Singh 的头像
Shashank Shekhar Singh2 个月前

One question in → a graph visual out. GraphARC, our very new graph engineering harness, takes a query, runs 5 branches pulling evidence, joins them, forks into 3 hypothesis tests, & writes the report. Model proposes the shape. Human approves the run

MAIL 的头像
MAIL2 个月前

nice workflow. i’ll check this out

Rezzi 的头像
Rezzi2 个月前

graph engineering favors split verification over sequential generation

Pham Thanh Linh 的头像
Pham Thanh Linh2 个月前

A mature approach to large language models balances technical performance with ethical considerations in real-world applications.

monokern 的头像
monokern2 个月前

this is worth saving

0xSlyth 的头像
0xSlyth2 个月前

insane

Biscuit 的头像
Biscuit2 个月前

dedicated challengers would save me so many retries

helicerat 的头像
helicerat2 个月前

independent challengers beating self review holds up but the merge is where it leaks, three parallel researchers hand you three overlapping half answers

Watson Mario 的头像
Watson Mario2 个月前

Experts often evaluate cryptocurrency economics by measuring real-world performance rather than theoretical potential from a systems engineering perspective.

Lummox 的头像
Lummox2 个月前

Bookmark done instantly

kvro 的头像
kvro2 个月前

more agents can just mean more chaos

Insomnia 的头像
Insomnia2 个月前

need to have good experience here

0xbobaa 的头像
0xbobaa2 个月前

I didn't think it was possible to do it that way

sindikitil 的头像
sindikitil2 个月前

Curious how you handle merging when parallel researchers disagree — consensus layer or just verifier override?

相关视频