正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

7 things we built with Opus 4.8 on Hyperagent 👇 1. Mars rover pathfinding simulator 2. Standup Island: a cozier place to review the kanban, inspired by Every 📧's livestream today 3. SpaceXAI + Anthropic partnership visualized 4. Landing page for an outdoor brand w/ Nano Banana + Veo... show more

Hyperagent

9,414 subscribers

2,171,888 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Warp now supports Claude Opus 4.8. Opus 4.8 is built for longer agent runs: planning up front, following through across multi-step coding tasks, and catching real bugs in review instead of stopping after one clean test run.

Warp now supports Claude Opus 4.8. Opus 4.8 is built for longer agent runs: planning up front, following through across multi-step coding tasks, and catching real bugs in review instead of stopping after one clean test run.

Warp

11,490 次观看 • 1 个月前

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

Dan Shipper 📧

353,254 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is amazing. Do this: 1. Set model to Opus 4.8 2. Reasoning effort to /ultracode Enables Claude Code's new Dynamic Workflows. Claude will autonomously detect complex tasks, write an orchestration script, and spawn an agent swarm.

This is amazing. Do this: 1. Set model to Opus 4.8 2. Reasoning effort to /ultracode Enables Claude Code's new Dynamic Workflows. Claude will autonomously detect complex tasks, write an orchestration script, and spawn an agent swarm.

Dan McAteer

856,733 次观看 • 1 个月前

opus 4.8 actually cooked at this design, designers actually cooked? it redesigned my landing page with this super clean UI live below 👇

opus 4.8 actually cooked at this design, designers actually cooked? it redesigned my landing page with this super clean UI live below 👇

Dhruval

19,885 次观看 • 1 个月前

We got early access to the Gemini Omni API Google is calling this model "Nano Banana for video" 3 things we built with it👇 1. Landscaping proposal from customer video. Customer submits a video of the current lot. Hyperagent designs and renders the transformation. Perfect realism, no surreal changes to the surroundings. 2. Animated professor who explains your dashboards. Hyperagent runs analysis on a business question, then generates an explainer video to walkthrough the findings. 3. 8-bit morning briefing. Hyperagent builds morning briefings based on calendar, email/chat, and market intel. Then generates a sidescrolling platformer video showing the goals you'll clear today. Our take: > Video has been a vastly underused input for agents. This is the first model to make video directly malleable to our agents. > Get more imaginative with your outputs. How could a video artifact make the work more memorable or playful? coming soon to Hyperagent

We got early access to the Gemini Omni API Google is calling this model "Nano Banana for video" 3 things we built with it👇 1. Landscaping proposal from customer video. Customer submits a video of the current lot. Hyperagent designs and renders the transformation. Perfect realism, no surreal changes to the surroundings. 2. Animated professor who explains your dashboards. Hyperagent runs analysis on a business question, then generates an explainer video to walkthrough the findings. 3. 8-bit morning briefing. Hyperagent builds morning briefings based on calendar, email/chat, and market intel. Then generates a sidescrolling platformer video showing the goals you'll clear today. Our take: > Video has been a vastly underused input for agents. This is the first model to make video directly malleable to our agents. > Get more imaginative with your outputs. How could a video artifact make the work more memorable or playful? coming soon to Hyperagent

Hyperagent

321,308 次观看 • 26 天前

Opus 4.6 lets you set the effort level Not every task needs high reasoning. For simpler tasks you can set it to low or medium. Claude thinks less (or skips it entirely), makes fewer tool calls, and gives more concise answers Lower effort = faster responses with fewer tokens!

Opus 4.6 lets you set the effort level Not every task needs high reasoning. For simpler tasks you can set it to low or medium. Claude thinks less (or skips it entirely), makes fewer tool calls, and gives more concise answers Lower effort = faster responses with fewer tokens!

Lydia Hallie ✨

32,459 次观看 • 5 个月前

This model is insane at design. I asked GLM 5.2 (left) and Opus 4.8 (right) to build me a landing page and you can't even tell the difference. GLM cost $0.06 while opus cost $0.49. More than 6x cheaper while being faster + more token efficient. Another win for open source AI.

This model is insane at design. I asked GLM 5.2 (left) and Opus 4.8 (right) to build me a landing page and you can't even tell the difference. GLM cost $0.06 while opus cost $0.49. More than 6x cheaper while being faster + more token efficient. Another win for open source AI.

Hassan

1,573,672 次观看 • 27 天前

Nano just got an upgrade. More robust design, improved durability, and clearer setup instructions. Built to make onboarding smoother and the experience better for every node operator.

Nano just got an upgrade. More robust design, improved durability, and clearer setup instructions. Built to make onboarding smoother and the experience better for every node operator.

YOM

2,158,886 次观看 • 19 天前

Vibe Coding Robotics part 3 Built a simulation where two robots collaborate to complete a task. Designed with Nano Banana Pro, built with Gemini 3.

Vibe Coding Robotics part 3 Built a simulation where two robots collaborate to complete a task. Designed with Nano Banana Pro, built with Gemini 3.

Dilum Sanjaya

132,476 次观看 • 6 个月前

I built an o1 alternative, that is: 1) Fully transparent, visually trackable 2) Infinitely recursive 3) Self-healing, with tests at every step 4) Capable of using a Python interpreter It performs shockingly well, check it out! 🧵Code + performance on popular reasoning problems

I built an o1 alternative, that is: 1) Fully transparent, visually trackable 2) Infinitely recursive 3) Self-healing, with tests at every step 4) Capable of using a Python interpreter It performs shockingly well, check it out! 🧵Code + performance on popular reasoning problems

trees of thought is in ny

187,890 次观看 • 1 年前

Fable 5 absolutely crushed the HTML5 physics contest, but cost 6x more than Opus 4.8 and 39× more than GLM 5.2 in that test. Test was done on atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally. The test asked 4 models to generate self-contained canvas demos with believable motion and collisions. The scenes were not simple animations because every crash needed gravity, force, timing, and contact handling. Outputs: - Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 - GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 - Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 - GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08

Fable 5 absolutely crushed the HTML5 physics contest, but cost 6x more than Opus 4.8 and 39× more than GLM 5.2 in that test. Test was done on atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally. The test asked 4 models to generate self-contained canvas demos with believable motion and collisions. The scenes were not simple animations because every crash needed gravity, force, timing, and contact handling. Outputs: - Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 - GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 - Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 - GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08

Rohan Paul

204,694 次观看 • 12 天前

UltraCode is running over 100 Opus 4.8 agents right now. This is the future of software development. Not 5 agents. Not 10. Over 100 working simultaneously across the entire BridgeMind ecosystem. This is what vibe coding looks like at scale. One person orchestrating a swarm of AI agents building, debugging, and shipping in parallel. We are so early.

UltraCode is running over 100 Opus 4.8 agents right now. This is the future of software development. Not 5 agents. Not 10. Over 100 working simultaneously across the entire BridgeMind ecosystem. This is what vibe coding looks like at scale. One person orchestrating a swarm of AI agents building, debugging, and shipping in parallel. We are so early.

BridgeMind

108,267 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is wild. Anthropic just dropped Claude 4 and it will completely change the AI coding game. 10 wild examples: 1. Flight simulator using Claude 4 Opus

This is wild. Anthropic just dropped Claude 4 and it will completely change the AI coding game. 10 wild examples: 1. Flight simulator using Claude 4 Opus

Min Choi

966,437 次观看 • 1 年前

Emergent 2.0 just dropped. You can now build apps, games, MCPs and extensions in 1 prompt. It now has a security review, scalability, and design agent which solves the flaws in Vibe coding platforms. 5 crazy examples + how to try free 👇: 1. GitHub Live Repo Visualizer

Emergent 2.0 just dropped. You can now build apps, games, MCPs and extensions in 1 prompt. It now has a security review, scalability, and design agent which solves the flaws in Vibe coding platforms. 5 crazy examples + how to try free 👇: 1. GitHub Live Repo Visualizer

Alvaro Cintas

104,340 次观看 • 1 年前

fable 5 is so nerfed. sometimes it feels like anthropic shipped the max version of opus 4.8. anthropic owes us an explanation.

fable 5 is so nerfed. sometimes it feels like anthropic shipped the max version of opus 4.8. anthropic owes us an explanation.

Ninza

153,037 次观看 • 12 天前

Some good progress on vibe coding this Street Fighter-like game. > Cursor with Opus 4.8 for majority of code > Spriterrific w/ Grok Imagine for animations Was a good learning experience compared to making a platformer Probably worth a full tutorial?

Some good progress on vibe coding this Street Fighter-like game. > Cursor with Opus 4.8 for majority of code > Spriterrific w/ Grok Imagine for animations Was a good learning experience compared to making a platformer Probably worth a full tutorial?

Chong-U

10,318 次观看 • 1 个月前

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

atomic.chat

725,764 次观看 • 13 天前

This is how you unlock the next billion software developers. The new Replit ⠕ Agent 3 (they just launched) is the most advanced vibe-coding agent in the world. 1. Smarter than any other vibe-coding model (10x more autonomous than the previous version). 2. It thinks harder and lasts longer than any other model (up to 200 minutes running fully autonomously). 3. The agent can now use an actual browser to test and fix its own code. 4. 3x faster and 10x more cost-effective than any other "Computer Use" for testing. 5. It can build other agents and automations to take care of repetitive tasks. Seeing the agent test the application autonomously is science fiction!

This is how you unlock the next billion software developers. The new Replit ⠕ Agent 3 (they just launched) is the most advanced vibe-coding agent in the world. 1. Smarter than any other vibe-coding model (10x more autonomous than the previous version). 2. It thinks harder and lasts longer than any other model (up to 200 minutes running fully autonomously). 3. The agent can now use an actual browser to test and fix its own code. 4. 3x faster and 10x more cost-effective than any other "Computer Use" for testing. 5. It can build other agents and automations to take care of repetitive tasks. Seeing the agent test the application autonomously is science fiction!

Santiago

167,056 次观看 • 10 个月前

Fable 5, first Mythos-class model is live on AI/ML API! We ran a fun test: Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 are generating a 3D Pokemon. Verdict? Fable 5 is brilliant, fast, and rare as Mew… but Opus is still that nice little guy who does great stuff. 💛 Fable 5 Important bits: SOTA on nearly every benchmark, and the lead only grows on longer, complex tasks. • 1M Context • $10 / 1M input • $50 / 1M output Built for: long-horizon agentic coding, big migrations, vision-to-code, deep research.

Fable 5, first Mythos-class model is live on AI/ML API! We ran a fun test: Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 are generating a 3D Pokemon. Verdict? Fable 5 is brilliant, fast, and rare as Mew… but Opus is still that nice little guy who does great stuff. 💛 Fable 5 Important bits: SOTA on nearly every benchmark, and the lead only grows on longer, complex tasks. • 1M Context • $10 / 1M input • $50 / 1M output Built for: long-horizon agentic coding, big migrations, vision-to-code, deep research.

AI/ML API

560,154 次观看 • 1 个月前

The dev world is buzzing. 🐝 GPT-5 is here and available for real-world coding tasks. What’s more? A brand new VS Code release for an editor that’s more powerful and intuitive than ever. (1/3)

Mario Rodriguez

15,975 次观看 • 11 个月前