正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 76% BACK MAHARASHTRA CAB RULES! ​Under Mahayuti Govt, Maharashtra’s new Cab Aggregator Policy emerges as a national benchmark: • Driver cancels? 10% fare given to passenger • Passenger cancels? 5% fare credited to driver • Minimum 80% fare payout to drivers • Compliance deadline: September 1 ​Non-compliant apps...

MeghUpdates's profile picture

Megh Updates 🚨™

650,085 subscribers

51,258 次观看 • 22 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨BIG NEWS! Fadnavis Govt Tightens Rules for Cab Aggregators in Maharashtra! New norms: > If a driver cancels a ride after booking, Passenger gets 10% of the fare as reward. > Passengers cancelling an assigned ride without valid reason will be charged 5% of the fare (capped at ₹100), credited directly to the DRIVER. Drivers will receive at least 80% of the total fare🎯 Deadline to comply: 1 September. Non-compliant aggregators will be barred from operating across Maharashtra🔥 Strong pro-driver push. Thoughts?
0:31

🚨BIG NEWS! Fadnavis Govt Tightens Rules for Cab Aggregators in Maharashtra! New norms: > If a driver cancels a ride after booking, Passenger gets 10% of the fare as reward. > Passengers cancelling an assigned ride without valid reason will be charged 5% of the fare (capped at ₹100), credited directly to the DRIVER. Drivers will receive at least 80% of the total fare🎯 Deadline to comply: 1 September. Non-compliant aggregators will be barred from operating across Maharashtra🔥 Strong pro-driver push. Thoughts?

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

418,100 次观看 • 25 天前

📢 New CAB Rules: • Govt permits Cab aggregators to charge up to 2X Base FARE during Peak Hours. • Drivers to earn 80% of fare, ensuring fairer payouts. • If a driver cancels ride after accepting, a penalty of 10% of fare (max ₹100) will apply. Follow for more🎯
0:21

📢 New CAB Rules: • Govt permits Cab aggregators to charge up to 2X Base FARE during Peak Hours. • Drivers to earn 80% of fare, ensuring fairer payouts. • If a driver cancels ride after accepting, a penalty of 10% of fare (max ₹100) will apply. Follow for more🎯

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

75,808 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨HUGE. Govt-backed Bharat Taxi gains massive traction ahead of nationwide rollout🤯 ~ Platform is adding 45,000 users daily and has crossed 4 lakh registered customers🔥 · Biggest shift: zero commission for drivers at launch, entire fare goes straight to them. Now live on Android and iOS, Bharat Taxi is positioning itself as a driver-first alternative to private cab apps👏
0:29

🚨HUGE. Govt-backed Bharat Taxi gains massive traction ahead of nationwide rollout🤯 ~ Platform is adding 45,000 users daily and has crossed 4 lakh registered customers🔥 · Biggest shift: zero commission for drivers at launch, entire fare goes straight to them. Now live on Android and iOS, Bharat Taxi is positioning itself as a driver-first alternative to private cab apps👏

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

142,381 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨BREAKING: A new video out of Minneapolis shows the truth ICE doesn’t want you to see… compliance does not protect you. In this video, ICE agents pull up to a vehicle and immediately demand the driver’s ID. The man calmly asks the most basic, legally protected question: “Why am I being pulled over?” They never answer… because they don’t have a legal reason to stop him. Even so, the man begins to retrieve his ID anyway. An agent then orders him to turn off the vehicle. The driver says, “No problem, sir, I’ll get out.” The agent refuses, then immediately changes commands again: “I need to see your ID.” Suddenly, an agent on the passenger side pounds on the window. Then he strikes it with a hard object, clearly threatening to break it. At the same time, the driver-side agent again demands the ID. This is not confusion. This is intentional command overload… a tactic used to manufacture “noncompliance” so force can be justified. ICE’s own training materials explicitly state: “Noncompliance or refusal to cooperate with officer commands, without fighting back, does NOT violate 18 U.S.C. § 111.” In plain English: not immediately obeying commands is NOT a crime. And here’s the key legal issue: Unless agents have: • a valid arrest warrant, or • probable cause that a specific crime has been committed they cannot: • use force • break windows • issue violent threats • detain or arrest someone Probable cause means specific, articulable facts that would make a reasonable officer believe a crime occurred… not vibes, not attitude, not silence, not filming, not asking questions. Back in the video, the passenger-side agent escalates further, shouting: “First time I ask you to roll your window down, you do it.” The driver responds: “Are you in danger, sir? Are you escalating this?” The agent replies: “I don’t know. Hands up.” Despite the driver repeatedly attempting to comply and hand over ID, agents continue shouting conflicting commands. At one point, the agent orders the driver to “talk to the original agent”… which is exactly what the driver was doing before the window-smashing threat. Then the man asks, “Are you feeling unsafe or uneasy?” The agent responds, “I don’t know, man.” while standing on the passenger side of the car, smirking. The driver finally says what anyone would say surrounded by armed men: “How many guns do I have around me? I need you to calm down. I’m asking him to stop banging on my car. Is that too much?” He even offers… again… to step out of the vehicle. This is not law enforcement. This is intimidation fishing for an excuse. No probable cause. No warrant. No lawful basis for force. And yet, the escalation came entirely from the agents. This video proves something chilling: you can comply, stay calm, ask lawful questions… and still be threatened with violence. So, the question isn’t “Why didn’t he just comply?” The question is how many people have already been assaulted under this exact playbook… and how many more will be, before this stops?
1:03

🚨BREAKING: A new video out of Minneapolis shows the truth ICE doesn’t want you to see… compliance does not protect you. In this video, ICE agents pull up to a vehicle and immediately demand the driver’s ID. The man calmly asks the most basic, legally protected question: “Why am I being pulled over?” They never answer… because they don’t have a legal reason to stop him. Even so, the man begins to retrieve his ID anyway. An agent then orders him to turn off the vehicle. The driver says, “No problem, sir, I’ll get out.” The agent refuses, then immediately changes commands again: “I need to see your ID.” Suddenly, an agent on the passenger side pounds on the window. Then he strikes it with a hard object, clearly threatening to break it. At the same time, the driver-side agent again demands the ID. This is not confusion. This is intentional command overload… a tactic used to manufacture “noncompliance” so force can be justified. ICE’s own training materials explicitly state: “Noncompliance or refusal to cooperate with officer commands, without fighting back, does NOT violate 18 U.S.C. § 111.” In plain English: not immediately obeying commands is NOT a crime. And here’s the key legal issue: Unless agents have: • a valid arrest warrant, or • probable cause that a specific crime has been committed they cannot: • use force • break windows • issue violent threats • detain or arrest someone Probable cause means specific, articulable facts that would make a reasonable officer believe a crime occurred… not vibes, not attitude, not silence, not filming, not asking questions. Back in the video, the passenger-side agent escalates further, shouting: “First time I ask you to roll your window down, you do it.” The driver responds: “Are you in danger, sir? Are you escalating this?” The agent replies: “I don’t know. Hands up.” Despite the driver repeatedly attempting to comply and hand over ID, agents continue shouting conflicting commands. At one point, the agent orders the driver to “talk to the original agent”… which is exactly what the driver was doing before the window-smashing threat. Then the man asks, “Are you feeling unsafe or uneasy?” The agent responds, “I don’t know, man.” while standing on the passenger side of the car, smirking. The driver finally says what anyone would say surrounded by armed men: “How many guns do I have around me? I need you to calm down. I’m asking him to stop banging on my car. Is that too much?” He even offers… again… to step out of the vehicle. This is not law enforcement. This is intimidation fishing for an excuse. No probable cause. No warrant. No lawful basis for force. And yet, the escalation came entirely from the agents. This video proves something chilling: you can comply, stay calm, ask lawful questions… and still be threatened with violence. So, the question isn’t “Why didn’t he just comply?” The question is how many people have already been assaulted under this exact playbook… and how many more will be, before this stops?

Jesus Freakin Congress

3,204,256 次观看 • 7 个月前

A routine traffic stop quickly escalated after a driver refused to provide identification and actively resisted officers. ​The entire encounter—from the initial tailgating violation to the final arrest—was captured on bodycam footage. ​ The officer initiated the stop after Joe reportedly followed her squad car at an unsafe distance while constantly honking his horn and flashing his lights. ​Throughout the encounter, Joe was extremely confrontational, aggressive, and uncooperative: ​He repeatedly used profanity and hurled derogatory insults at the officer. ​He refused to identify himself or provide his driver's license. ​He instructed his young child, who was a passenger in the vehicle, to get out and scream for help. ​He claimed that the officer was the one breaking the law by using her cell phone while driving. ​When a backup officer (a supervisor) arrived on the scene, Joe continued his combative behavior. He argued that honking his horn was not illegal and demanded to know what specific law he had broken. ​When the officers attempted to place Joe under arrest, he actively resisted. He refused to exit his vehicle, screamed that the officers were choking him (which the video evidence contradicts), and had to be physically removed and secured in the back of the police cruiser. Joe's actions during the traffic stop led to several specific criminal charges: ​1. Following Too Closely / Unlawful Use of a Horn ​The initial reason for the stop was a traffic violation. Under most state traffic laws (including Wisconsin, where this incident took place), drivers must maintain a safe following distance. Furthermore, vehicle horns are legally intended only to warn of immediate danger, not to harass or signal displeasure. Joe's continuous honking and tailgating constituted a valid reason for a traffic stop. ​2. Refusal to Identify / Provide a License ​While Joe correctly noted that citizens do not always have to identify themselves to police, traffic stops are a major exception. When operating a motor vehicle, a driver is legally required to present a valid driver's license upon the request of a law enforcement officer. Refusing to do so is a secondary offense and prevents the officer from issuing a standard citation. ​3. Resisting and Obstructing an Officer ​Joe was charged with resisting/obstructing an officer. Legally, "obstructing" includes knowingly giving false information or refusing to comply with lawful commands (such as refusing to sign a ticket or show ID). "Resisting" applies to his physical non-compliance when officers ordered him out of the vehicle and his subsequent physical struggle against being handcuffed and placed in the squad car. ​4. Disorderly Conduct ​Joe's loud, profane screaming in a public space, combined with triggering a disruptive situation by forcing his child to scream for help, falls under disorderly conduct. This charge applies to behavior that is violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, or otherwise unreasonably disruptive. ​5. Battery to a Law Enforcement Officer ​During the physical struggle to place Joe under arrest, his actions escalated to physical resistance that resulted in a charge of battery to a law enforcement officer. This is a felony charge in many jurisdictions, applying when an individual intentionally causes bodily harm (or takes actions likely to cause harm) to an officer acting in their official capacity.
12:16

A routine traffic stop quickly escalated after a driver refused to provide identification and actively resisted officers. ​The entire encounter—from the initial tailgating violation to the final arrest—was captured on bodycam footage. ​ The officer initiated the stop after Joe reportedly followed her squad car at an unsafe distance while constantly honking his horn and flashing his lights. ​Throughout the encounter, Joe was extremely confrontational, aggressive, and uncooperative: ​He repeatedly used profanity and hurled derogatory insults at the officer. ​He refused to identify himself or provide his driver's license. ​He instructed his young child, who was a passenger in the vehicle, to get out and scream for help. ​He claimed that the officer was the one breaking the law by using her cell phone while driving. ​When a backup officer (a supervisor) arrived on the scene, Joe continued his combative behavior. He argued that honking his horn was not illegal and demanded to know what specific law he had broken. ​When the officers attempted to place Joe under arrest, he actively resisted. He refused to exit his vehicle, screamed that the officers were choking him (which the video evidence contradicts), and had to be physically removed and secured in the back of the police cruiser. Joe's actions during the traffic stop led to several specific criminal charges: ​1. Following Too Closely / Unlawful Use of a Horn ​The initial reason for the stop was a traffic violation. Under most state traffic laws (including Wisconsin, where this incident took place), drivers must maintain a safe following distance. Furthermore, vehicle horns are legally intended only to warn of immediate danger, not to harass or signal displeasure. Joe's continuous honking and tailgating constituted a valid reason for a traffic stop. ​2. Refusal to Identify / Provide a License ​While Joe correctly noted that citizens do not always have to identify themselves to police, traffic stops are a major exception. When operating a motor vehicle, a driver is legally required to present a valid driver's license upon the request of a law enforcement officer. Refusing to do so is a secondary offense and prevents the officer from issuing a standard citation. ​3. Resisting and Obstructing an Officer ​Joe was charged with resisting/obstructing an officer. Legally, "obstructing" includes knowingly giving false information or refusing to comply with lawful commands (such as refusing to sign a ticket or show ID). "Resisting" applies to his physical non-compliance when officers ordered him out of the vehicle and his subsequent physical struggle against being handcuffed and placed in the squad car. ​4. Disorderly Conduct ​Joe's loud, profane screaming in a public space, combined with triggering a disruptive situation by forcing his child to scream for help, falls under disorderly conduct. This charge applies to behavior that is violent, abusive, indecent, profane, boisterous, or otherwise unreasonably disruptive. ​5. Battery to a Law Enforcement Officer ​During the physical struggle to place Joe under arrest, his actions escalated to physical resistance that resulted in a charge of battery to a law enforcement officer. This is a felony charge in many jurisdictions, applying when an individual intentionally causes bodily harm (or takes actions likely to cause harm) to an officer acting in their official capacity.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

16,503 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 Ford’s deadly 401 speed gamble While big rigs continue to kill and injure Ontarians, Premier Ford is increasing speed limits along major highways. On July 11, 2026, a clear afternoon on the eastbound 401 near Townline Road in Cambridge turned deadly. Nine vehicles collided in a massive pile-up. A 44-year-old man from Kitchener was airlifted but ultimately succumbed to his injuries, and fifteen others were injured. All eastbound lanes were closed for ten hours. A transport truck driver was arrested for dangerous driving and later released pending investigation. More and more, this is no longer an isolated tragedy on North America’s largest – and Ontario’s busiest – highway. While transport trucks make up roughly 3% of vehicles on the road, they are involved in 12% of fatal crashes. At least that’s what Auditor General Shelley Spence said in her May report, which detailed just how dangerous and inadequate commercial truck driver training has become in the province. The report detailed how private career colleges were skipping required hours, cutting programs from the mandated 103.5 hours down to as little as 59 or 81, in some cases. Students were not taught basic emergency stops or left turns at major intersections. Unregistered schools are issuing certificates, and dozens of colleges operate entirely uninspected. The 2017 Entry Level Training standard has largely collapsed under this weak government oversight. While the Ford government accepted every one of the AG’s recommendations, real enforcement has been notably absent. Adding insult to injury, just days before the Cambridge crash, the Globe and Mail reported that nearly 100 trucking companies with serious safety violations and failed audits, and Ottawa had approved wage theft orders to hire temporary foreign workers. Of those, several Ontario firms with conditional safety ratings continued operating with these approvals. Many companies use “Driver Inc.” models that misclassify drivers as independent contractors. This allows them to dodge proper wages, overtime, and hours-of-service rules. The result is financial pressure that encourages cost-cutting and incentivizes drivers to stay on the road, even when they should be taking a break. The Ontario Trucking Association has been calling on the government to do something about this for years. Stronger enforcement measures include “tightening oversight of immigration, revamping licensing and audit processes, and introducing changes to the way truck inspection stations operate,” they wrote in October last year. Meanwhile, the Ford government is busy raising speed limits across long stretches of the 401 and other highways. Passenger cars can now travel faster while heavy trucks are supposed to remain electronically governed at 105 km/h. Yet given the documented failures in training, inspections, and company oversight, many drivers rightly question whether those limiters are properly installed, set correctly, or enforced at all. Premier Doug Ford and Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria cannot have it both ways. Families heading to cottage country and commuters on the 401 should not have to play Russian roulette every time they merge onto the highway. You cannot flood the roads with drivers produced by a broken training system and questionable hiring practices, then raise speeds and act surprised when the body count rises. The scope and risks of this system require immediate action: full audits of every truck driving school, aggressive 24/7 enforcement on speed limiters and illegal operations, an end to rubber-stamping temporary foreign worker approvals for companies with safety violations, and prioritizing safety over speed increases until the system is fixed. Full report by Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦.
10:03

🚨 Ford’s deadly 401 speed gamble While big rigs continue to kill and injure Ontarians, Premier Ford is increasing speed limits along major highways. On July 11, 2026, a clear afternoon on the eastbound 401 near Townline Road in Cambridge turned deadly. Nine vehicles collided in a massive pile-up. A 44-year-old man from Kitchener was airlifted but ultimately succumbed to his injuries, and fifteen others were injured. All eastbound lanes were closed for ten hours. A transport truck driver was arrested for dangerous driving and later released pending investigation. More and more, this is no longer an isolated tragedy on North America’s largest – and Ontario’s busiest – highway. While transport trucks make up roughly 3% of vehicles on the road, they are involved in 12% of fatal crashes. At least that’s what Auditor General Shelley Spence said in her May report, which detailed just how dangerous and inadequate commercial truck driver training has become in the province. The report detailed how private career colleges were skipping required hours, cutting programs from the mandated 103.5 hours down to as little as 59 or 81, in some cases. Students were not taught basic emergency stops or left turns at major intersections. Unregistered schools are issuing certificates, and dozens of colleges operate entirely uninspected. The 2017 Entry Level Training standard has largely collapsed under this weak government oversight. While the Ford government accepted every one of the AG’s recommendations, real enforcement has been notably absent. Adding insult to injury, just days before the Cambridge crash, the Globe and Mail reported that nearly 100 trucking companies with serious safety violations and failed audits, and Ottawa had approved wage theft orders to hire temporary foreign workers. Of those, several Ontario firms with conditional safety ratings continued operating with these approvals. Many companies use “Driver Inc.” models that misclassify drivers as independent contractors. This allows them to dodge proper wages, overtime, and hours-of-service rules. The result is financial pressure that encourages cost-cutting and incentivizes drivers to stay on the road, even when they should be taking a break. The Ontario Trucking Association has been calling on the government to do something about this for years. Stronger enforcement measures include “tightening oversight of immigration, revamping licensing and audit processes, and introducing changes to the way truck inspection stations operate,” they wrote in October last year. Meanwhile, the Ford government is busy raising speed limits across long stretches of the 401 and other highways. Passenger cars can now travel faster while heavy trucks are supposed to remain electronically governed at 105 km/h. Yet given the documented failures in training, inspections, and company oversight, many drivers rightly question whether those limiters are properly installed, set correctly, or enforced at all. Premier Doug Ford and Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria cannot have it both ways. Families heading to cottage country and commuters on the 401 should not have to play Russian roulette every time they merge onto the highway. You cannot flood the roads with drivers produced by a broken training system and questionable hiring practices, then raise speeds and act surprised when the body count rises. The scope and risks of this system require immediate action: full audits of every truck driving school, aggressive 24/7 enforcement on speed limiters and illegal operations, an end to rubber-stamping temporary foreign worker approvals for companies with safety violations, and prioritizing safety over speed increases until the system is fixed. Full report by Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦.

Rebel News

29,229 次观看 • 1 个月前

ALBO’S GLOBALIST MASTERS EXPOSED: THE ATTACK ON AUSTRALIAN SOVEREIGNTY! 🛑🇦🇺 Good little obedient global citizen and UN devotee Anthony Albanese must have been hitting the botox hard and sucking his cheeks in to give his face that freshfaced plumpness when he was identified as a WEF Young Global Leader in 2006 💉✨, when he was a “youthful” 43 years old. 👶 The experience Albanese gained through the Young Global Leaders program because of their association with the Australian Labor Party has undoubtedly influenced his approach to leadership and policy 🌍📉. Albo is all about an international rules based order, including: gender inequality 🚻, foreign economic development paid for by Australians 💸, digital transformation and control 📲👁️, and nation destroying climate change policies - good ol Albo is rolling out the agenda set for him by his international overlords 👑🌏. Just look at what gets Albo's juices pumping: We're seeing not necessarily the most suitable and competent person appointed to critical national roles, just a person with an attribute Albo needs to tick that WEF gender inequality compliance box ✅🗳️. Taxpayer funds funnelled not to local needs, but as a global priority to far away lands and to nations in our Pacific region - bizarrely exorbitant cash splashes made on credit that deprioritises and ignores Australians 🏝️💰💳. And environment harming trade deals and foreign agreements under the banner of climate change mitigation 🌪️🤝, and based on the elimination of one of the only things Australia really has left to sell, (given we have virtually no manufacturing). And that’s coal ⛏️🚫. It doesn't take much to destroy our nation which was built on the back of hard slog, our natural resources and fair opportunities for all Australians 🛠️💪🇦🇺. But thanks to socialist globalist Albo and his compliant malfunctioning starstruck Labor revellers of ineptitude on a global scale 😵‍💫🚩, Australia is rapidly declining, circling the international plug hole, ready to slurp down into the sewer of socialism, at any MOMENT 🚽🌪️. #CostOfLiving #WEF #AustralianEnergy #LaborFail #AlboMustGo #Greg4Victoria #GregCheesman4Victoria #Victoria2026 #OneNation #AusPol #SpringStreet
2:11

ALBO’S GLOBALIST MASTERS EXPOSED: THE ATTACK ON AUSTRALIAN SOVEREIGNTY! 🛑🇦🇺 Good little obedient global citizen and UN devotee Anthony Albanese must have been hitting the botox hard and sucking his cheeks in to give his face that freshfaced plumpness when he was identified as a WEF Young Global Leader in 2006 💉✨, when he was a “youthful” 43 years old. 👶 The experience Albanese gained through the Young Global Leaders program because of their association with the Australian Labor Party has undoubtedly influenced his approach to leadership and policy 🌍📉. Albo is all about an international rules based order, including: gender inequality 🚻, foreign economic development paid for by Australians 💸, digital transformation and control 📲👁️, and nation destroying climate change policies - good ol Albo is rolling out the agenda set for him by his international overlords 👑🌏. Just look at what gets Albo's juices pumping: We're seeing not necessarily the most suitable and competent person appointed to critical national roles, just a person with an attribute Albo needs to tick that WEF gender inequality compliance box ✅🗳️. Taxpayer funds funnelled not to local needs, but as a global priority to far away lands and to nations in our Pacific region - bizarrely exorbitant cash splashes made on credit that deprioritises and ignores Australians 🏝️💰💳. And environment harming trade deals and foreign agreements under the banner of climate change mitigation 🌪️🤝, and based on the elimination of one of the only things Australia really has left to sell, (given we have virtually no manufacturing). And that’s coal ⛏️🚫. It doesn't take much to destroy our nation which was built on the back of hard slog, our natural resources and fair opportunities for all Australians 🛠️💪🇦🇺. But thanks to socialist globalist Albo and his compliant malfunctioning starstruck Labor revellers of ineptitude on a global scale 😵‍💫🚩, Australia is rapidly declining, circling the international plug hole, ready to slurp down into the sewer of socialism, at any MOMENT 🚽🌪️. #CostOfLiving #WEF #AustralianEnergy #LaborFail #AlboMustGo #Greg4Victoria #GregCheesman4Victoria #Victoria2026 #OneNation #AusPol #SpringStreet

Greg Cheesman

13,002 次观看 • 3 个月前

President Gay has become a major liability for Harvard University: **🎥Shocking Video of President Gay’s Testimony to Congress on Tuesday, December 5’th below.** 1) If her inflammatory and Antisemitic statements continue Harvard will likely be charged under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI clarified to explicitly include Antisemitism by the Biden Administration on September 26, 2023. 2) Harvard and other endowments may lose special tax exempt status. Treasury may argue that by taking a specific political position against Jewish Americans, a position that would not be taken against other ethnic groups, Harvard is politicizing itself and thus subject to ordinary tax treatment. This would be disastrous to Harvard University and Harvard Corporation and this could involuntarily drag along other endowments into a taxable status. 3) Donors, both Jewish and the 90% of alumni who do not share Antisemitic views will vote with their feet and as much as a predicted 60-90% of future donations may be lost from the alumni base. Non-Jewish alumni will be reluctant to step into the political crossfires by supporting an institution that explicitly condones and protects genocidal statements (shockingly in President Gay's own words). The vast majority (97% of donations) are made on a non-anonymous basis in order to build legacy at Harvard and with 1000's of causes competing with Harvard - donors will be reluctant to donate and be labeled bigoted and complicit in genocidal rhetoric through a historic lens. The Harvard Corporation has a Fiduciary duty to both the University and its alumni base to: 1) Remove President Gay effective immediately. 2) Take immediate action and expel students who are threatening and intimidating Jewish students with genocidial statements (no more teethless PR statements). 3) Outline specific policies that puts Harvard back into compliance to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI and takes away the risk of litigation, loss of federal funding, and loss of tax exempt status. Action must be taken TODAY in order to turn around the disastrous mismanagement of Harvard University, Harvard Corporation, and the Harvard Brand by President Gay an institution President Gay inherited with a nearly 400 year track record and brand. Harvard alumni can no longer sit on the sidelines and hope that President Gay “pivots from Antisemitism”. We are asked at convocation to show class unity and to stand with our classmates. Today, Jewish Students and Alumni ask that ALL Harvad Alumni, Jewish, Arab, and Gentile, Straight or LGBTQ+, Black, Brown, White, Hispanic, stand with US and reject Genocide and its defenders. We implore Harvard Corporation to build the moral courage and to defend their Fiduciary duty. -A Concerned Alumni #Harvard #Antisemitism #CivilRights
1:15

President Gay has become a major liability for Harvard University: **🎥Shocking Video of President Gay’s Testimony to Congress on Tuesday, December 5’th below.** 1) If her inflammatory and Antisemitic statements continue Harvard will likely be charged under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI clarified to explicitly include Antisemitism by the Biden Administration on September 26, 2023. 2) Harvard and other endowments may lose special tax exempt status. Treasury may argue that by taking a specific political position against Jewish Americans, a position that would not be taken against other ethnic groups, Harvard is politicizing itself and thus subject to ordinary tax treatment. This would be disastrous to Harvard University and Harvard Corporation and this could involuntarily drag along other endowments into a taxable status. 3) Donors, both Jewish and the 90% of alumni who do not share Antisemitic views will vote with their feet and as much as a predicted 60-90% of future donations may be lost from the alumni base. Non-Jewish alumni will be reluctant to step into the political crossfires by supporting an institution that explicitly condones and protects genocidal statements (shockingly in President Gay's own words). The vast majority (97% of donations) are made on a non-anonymous basis in order to build legacy at Harvard and with 1000's of causes competing with Harvard - donors will be reluctant to donate and be labeled bigoted and complicit in genocidal rhetoric through a historic lens. The Harvard Corporation has a Fiduciary duty to both the University and its alumni base to: 1) Remove President Gay effective immediately. 2) Take immediate action and expel students who are threatening and intimidating Jewish students with genocidial statements (no more teethless PR statements). 3) Outline specific policies that puts Harvard back into compliance to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI and takes away the risk of litigation, loss of federal funding, and loss of tax exempt status. Action must be taken TODAY in order to turn around the disastrous mismanagement of Harvard University, Harvard Corporation, and the Harvard Brand by President Gay an institution President Gay inherited with a nearly 400 year track record and brand. Harvard alumni can no longer sit on the sidelines and hope that President Gay “pivots from Antisemitism”. We are asked at convocation to show class unity and to stand with our classmates. Today, Jewish Students and Alumni ask that ALL Harvad Alumni, Jewish, Arab, and Gentile, Straight or LGBTQ+, Black, Brown, White, Hispanic, stand with US and reject Genocide and its defenders. We implore Harvard Corporation to build the moral courage and to defend their Fiduciary duty. -A Concerned Alumni #Harvard #Antisemitism #CivilRights

David Weisburd 🚀

3,622,862 次观看 • 2 年前

In the spring of 2022, former President Barack Obama gave a major policy addressat Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Center, where he laid out a sweeping proposal for government censorship of social media platforms through the Platform Accountability and Transparency Act. Six days later, President Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security announced that it had created a “Disinformation Governance Board” to serve as an Orwellian Ministry of Truth with the clear goal of controlling the information Americans could access online. At the heart of Obama’s vision for Internet censorship was legislation that would have authorized the US government’s National Science Foundation to authorize and fund supposedly independent NGOs to censor the Internet. The DHS and Stanford Internet Observatory, which was part of the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, pioneered this censorship-by-proxy strategy as a way to get around the First Amendment in 2020 with posts raising concerns about the 2020 elections and in 2021 with “narratives” expressing concern about the Covid vaccine. The 2024 election of President Donald Trump significantly reduced the threat of Obama, DHS, and NSF censoring the American people. Trump defunded much of the Censorship Industrial Complex. The Platform Accountability Act is going nowhere in Congress. Elon Musk fired most of the censorship staff at Twitter and has allowed a significantly wider range of speech on the platform. And even before Trump’s election, Stanford donor Frank McCourt stopped funding the Stanford Internet Observatory after Public, Racket News, and House Weaponization Subcommittee Chairman Jim Jordan exposed its central role in the DHS censorship-by-proxy scheme. But now, foreign governments, including Europe, the UK, Brazil, Australia, and others are demanding censorship, including of the American people. The risk is that US tech companies will find it significantly less expensive to have a single global censorship regime and just go along with foreign censorship requests. Facebook complied with Biden administration demands to censor because it needed Biden’s help in dealing with European censorship officials. And the Brazilian government forced Elon Musk to continue censoring the Brazilian people after it froze Starlink’s assets. And Public has discovered that the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, which is led by Obama’s former ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, is at the heart of a new, secretive, and possibly illegal censorship initiative that appears even more ambitious than the one Obama proposed in 2022. On September 24, the Cyber Policy Center hosted a secret dinner between its leaders and top censorship officials from Europe, UK, Brazil, California and Australia. The meeting was titled “Compliance and Enforcement in a Rapidly Evolving Landscape.” Frank McCourt, the same person behind the Stanford Internet Observatory, financed the gathering through his “Project Liberty Institute,” (PLI), toward which he gave $500 million to “strengthen democracy” and “foster responsible technology.” Public emailed all 21 participants and organizers and only heard from four, PLI, the Australian government, the UK government, and the European Union, which declined to comment because, even though Public gave it over 24 hours, a spokesperson said, “We would need several days.” The UK government said, “The legal framework gives Ofcom power to enforce the duties in the Act which are related to securing protections for people in the UK; it does not give Ofcom powers to enforce under any other legal regimes…. Ofcom has always engaged with various international forums and networks across all of the sectors we regulate, including online safety, spectrum, telecommunications, post, and broadcast and media. Regulators around the world regularly exchange insights, experience, and best practice.” A spokesperson for PLI said it “has made unrestricted gifts to several academic research programs, including Stanford University” and that “PLI does not receive funding from governments, intergovernmental organizations, or large technology companies.” But PLI’s own policy “blueprint” reveals that it is demanding a single total global censorship regime and intends to use the EU’s market power, known as the “Brussels effect,” to force big tech companies to comply. The blueprint calls for governments to “Recommit to a Single, Global Internet,” with “regulatory interoperability and oversight, to achieve a single unified market” and use the large size of the EU market to “drive bilateral and multilateral agendas to formally enshrine reciprocal guarantees.” A spokesperson for the Australian government said, “Whilst in attendance at Stanford for the 2-day conference, some attendees, including trust and safety researchers, industry, civil society, and government representatives, were also invited to attend an informal evening roundtable event organised by Stanford University entitled, ‘Compliance and Enforcement in a Rapidly Evolving Landscape.’ This roundtable did not involve any discussion of compliance coordination or regulatory information sharing.” The Australian spokesperson claimed that “eSafety has no role in regulating hate speech or disinformation. eSafety has no remit or interest in regulating the affairs of other nations, nor does it have any role in diplomatic, trade or other government-to-government relations.” But it also said, “As the internet is global and functions irrespective of national borders, by necessity eSafety collaborates with law enforcement, other government agencies, and non-government partners around the world, including in the United States.” The leaked agenda’s stated purpose was to “discuss the state of compliance and enforcement” in order to “identify where data, research, and expertise can enable more effective compliance with and enforcement of existing policy.” Much of the following two days of the public conference were focused on coordinating government censorship (“regulation”) of social media platforms, and the other nations that attended the meeting are all intensively involved in censoring their citizens and US tech companies. And, the head of Australia’s eSafety, Julie Inman-Grant, who was a keynote speaker at Stanford’s foreign censorship meeting, is also the head of a global government censorship network that serves as forum, she told the World Economic Forum, “to help us coordinate, build capacity and do just that…. We use the tools that we have, and can be effective, but we know we’re going to be, go, much further, when we work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe.” As such, the people who are demanding censorship are once again spreading disinformation about what they are doing. All of this is happening in a context of global censorship intensifying. The UK government arrests 30 people per day for “offensive” social media posts, is attempting to censor 4Chan, which has no servers in the UK, and will mandate digital IDs for employment, which may give unprecedented control to politicians and bureaucrats to censor. The Brazilian government has, for year,s been censoring journalists and policymakers, incarcerating people for legal social media content, and threatening prosecution of journalists, including this author. And several European nations are censoring and arresting their citizens, preventing opposition political candidates from running for office, and preparing to implement digital IDs. Why did Stanford Cyber Policy Center hold this meeting, what is its strategy for global censorship? Who leaked the agenda to Public and why? And what can be done to stop Stanford, Brazil, Australia, the EU and others from realizing their totalitarian censorial vision? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigatie journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!
7:34

In the spring of 2022, former President Barack Obama gave a major policy addressat Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Center, where he laid out a sweeping proposal for government censorship of social media platforms through the Platform Accountability and Transparency Act. Six days later, President Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security announced that it had created a “Disinformation Governance Board” to serve as an Orwellian Ministry of Truth with the clear goal of controlling the information Americans could access online. At the heart of Obama’s vision for Internet censorship was legislation that would have authorized the US government’s National Science Foundation to authorize and fund supposedly independent NGOs to censor the Internet. The DHS and Stanford Internet Observatory, which was part of the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, pioneered this censorship-by-proxy strategy as a way to get around the First Amendment in 2020 with posts raising concerns about the 2020 elections and in 2021 with “narratives” expressing concern about the Covid vaccine. The 2024 election of President Donald Trump significantly reduced the threat of Obama, DHS, and NSF censoring the American people. Trump defunded much of the Censorship Industrial Complex. The Platform Accountability Act is going nowhere in Congress. Elon Musk fired most of the censorship staff at Twitter and has allowed a significantly wider range of speech on the platform. And even before Trump’s election, Stanford donor Frank McCourt stopped funding the Stanford Internet Observatory after Public, Racket News, and House Weaponization Subcommittee Chairman Jim Jordan exposed its central role in the DHS censorship-by-proxy scheme. But now, foreign governments, including Europe, the UK, Brazil, Australia, and others are demanding censorship, including of the American people. The risk is that US tech companies will find it significantly less expensive to have a single global censorship regime and just go along with foreign censorship requests. Facebook complied with Biden administration demands to censor because it needed Biden’s help in dealing with European censorship officials. And the Brazilian government forced Elon Musk to continue censoring the Brazilian people after it froze Starlink’s assets. And Public has discovered that the Stanford Cyber Policy Center, which is led by Obama’s former ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, is at the heart of a new, secretive, and possibly illegal censorship initiative that appears even more ambitious than the one Obama proposed in 2022. On September 24, the Cyber Policy Center hosted a secret dinner between its leaders and top censorship officials from Europe, UK, Brazil, California and Australia. The meeting was titled “Compliance and Enforcement in a Rapidly Evolving Landscape.” Frank McCourt, the same person behind the Stanford Internet Observatory, financed the gathering through his “Project Liberty Institute,” (PLI), toward which he gave $500 million to “strengthen democracy” and “foster responsible technology.” Public emailed all 21 participants and organizers and only heard from four, PLI, the Australian government, the UK government, and the European Union, which declined to comment because, even though Public gave it over 24 hours, a spokesperson said, “We would need several days.” The UK government said, “The legal framework gives Ofcom power to enforce the duties in the Act which are related to securing protections for people in the UK; it does not give Ofcom powers to enforce under any other legal regimes…. Ofcom has always engaged with various international forums and networks across all of the sectors we regulate, including online safety, spectrum, telecommunications, post, and broadcast and media. Regulators around the world regularly exchange insights, experience, and best practice.” A spokesperson for PLI said it “has made unrestricted gifts to several academic research programs, including Stanford University” and that “PLI does not receive funding from governments, intergovernmental organizations, or large technology companies.” But PLI’s own policy “blueprint” reveals that it is demanding a single total global censorship regime and intends to use the EU’s market power, known as the “Brussels effect,” to force big tech companies to comply. The blueprint calls for governments to “Recommit to a Single, Global Internet,” with “regulatory interoperability and oversight, to achieve a single unified market” and use the large size of the EU market to “drive bilateral and multilateral agendas to formally enshrine reciprocal guarantees.” A spokesperson for the Australian government said, “Whilst in attendance at Stanford for the 2-day conference, some attendees, including trust and safety researchers, industry, civil society, and government representatives, were also invited to attend an informal evening roundtable event organised by Stanford University entitled, ‘Compliance and Enforcement in a Rapidly Evolving Landscape.’ This roundtable did not involve any discussion of compliance coordination or regulatory information sharing.” The Australian spokesperson claimed that “eSafety has no role in regulating hate speech or disinformation. eSafety has no remit or interest in regulating the affairs of other nations, nor does it have any role in diplomatic, trade or other government-to-government relations.” But it also said, “As the internet is global and functions irrespective of national borders, by necessity eSafety collaborates with law enforcement, other government agencies, and non-government partners around the world, including in the United States.” The leaked agenda’s stated purpose was to “discuss the state of compliance and enforcement” in order to “identify where data, research, and expertise can enable more effective compliance with and enforcement of existing policy.” Much of the following two days of the public conference were focused on coordinating government censorship (“regulation”) of social media platforms, and the other nations that attended the meeting are all intensively involved in censoring their citizens and US tech companies. And, the head of Australia’s eSafety, Julie Inman-Grant, who was a keynote speaker at Stanford’s foreign censorship meeting, is also the head of a global government censorship network that serves as forum, she told the World Economic Forum, “to help us coordinate, build capacity and do just that…. We use the tools that we have, and can be effective, but we know we’re going to be, go, much further, when we work together with other like-minded independent statutory authorities around the globe.” As such, the people who are demanding censorship are once again spreading disinformation about what they are doing. All of this is happening in a context of global censorship intensifying. The UK government arrests 30 people per day for “offensive” social media posts, is attempting to censor 4Chan, which has no servers in the UK, and will mandate digital IDs for employment, which may give unprecedented control to politicians and bureaucrats to censor. The Brazilian government has, for year,s been censoring journalists and policymakers, incarcerating people for legal social media content, and threatening prosecution of journalists, including this author. And several European nations are censoring and arresting their citizens, preventing opposition political candidates from running for office, and preparing to implement digital IDs. Why did Stanford Cyber Policy Center hold this meeting, what is its strategy for global censorship? Who leaked the agenda to Public and why? And what can be done to stop Stanford, Brazil, Australia, the EU and others from realizing their totalitarian censorial vision? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigatie journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

196,124 次观看 • 10 个月前

Peace or annihilation? Subject: Imminent Shift in Global Status Quo Following Putin-Trump Dialogue The world as you know it has changed. On March 14, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a direct telephone conversation, bypassing your influence and signaling the end of the current global status quo. This call—a pivotal moment addressing Ukraine, among other critical issues—marks the collapse of your carefully constructed narratives and the failure of your "Great Reset" and "Build Back Better" agendas. Your time is up. It is time to step down. Key Developments The Putin-Trump Call: This 90-minute exchange covered Ukraine, the Middle East, AI, energy, and the U.S. dollar. Both leaders agreed to initiate immediate negotiations to end the conflict in Ukraine, demonstrating a unified intent to reshape global dynamics without your input. Your Exclusion: European and UK leaders were neither consulted nor informed, exposing your irrelevance. Your strategy of isolating Russia through sanctions and diplomatic pressure has crumbled, and the United States is now forging a path forward with Russia directly. A New Power Alignment: The USA, under Trump, is reasserting its dominance and aligning with Russia to secure peace in Ukraine. Your attempts to maintain control through globalist policies are obsolete. Ultimatum Be warned: any step, narrative, or action against the peace process in Ukraine will be considered an act of war against the United States or Russia. We will not tolerate interference. Retaliation will be swift and uncompromising, escalating as follows: Sanctions on Globalist Networks: Immediate sanctions will target all entities linked to George Soros and other European and UK globalist elites. Your financial operations will be dismantled, your assets frozen, and your access to international systems severed. Joint USA-Russia Military Operation: If you persist, the United States and Russia will launch a special joint military operation to "free Europe" from your corrupt influence. This will be a decisive strike to eliminate the deep state structures threatening global stability. Reminder of Your Vulnerability Everything in Europe—your defense systems, financial networks, and critical infrastructure—operates on American technology and systems. From NATO capabilities to the SWIFT financial framework, you are entirely dependent on the United States. Defiance of U.S. policy will see these systems withdrawn, leaving you isolated and powerless. You cannot survive without American support. Compliance is Mandatory The European and UK globalist elites, with your sinister deep state agendas, must comply fully with the United States and President Trump’s policies. The peace process in Ukraine is non-negotiable. The world is moving forward, and you are no longer in control. Step down now, or face the consequences of your obsolescence. Your reign ends here.
0:32

Peace or annihilation? Subject: Imminent Shift in Global Status Quo Following Putin-Trump Dialogue The world as you know it has changed. On March 14, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in a direct telephone conversation, bypassing your influence and signaling the end of the current global status quo. This call—a pivotal moment addressing Ukraine, among other critical issues—marks the collapse of your carefully constructed narratives and the failure of your "Great Reset" and "Build Back Better" agendas. Your time is up. It is time to step down. Key Developments The Putin-Trump Call: This 90-minute exchange covered Ukraine, the Middle East, AI, energy, and the U.S. dollar. Both leaders agreed to initiate immediate negotiations to end the conflict in Ukraine, demonstrating a unified intent to reshape global dynamics without your input. Your Exclusion: European and UK leaders were neither consulted nor informed, exposing your irrelevance. Your strategy of isolating Russia through sanctions and diplomatic pressure has crumbled, and the United States is now forging a path forward with Russia directly. A New Power Alignment: The USA, under Trump, is reasserting its dominance and aligning with Russia to secure peace in Ukraine. Your attempts to maintain control through globalist policies are obsolete. Ultimatum Be warned: any step, narrative, or action against the peace process in Ukraine will be considered an act of war against the United States or Russia. We will not tolerate interference. Retaliation will be swift and uncompromising, escalating as follows: Sanctions on Globalist Networks: Immediate sanctions will target all entities linked to George Soros and other European and UK globalist elites. Your financial operations will be dismantled, your assets frozen, and your access to international systems severed. Joint USA-Russia Military Operation: If you persist, the United States and Russia will launch a special joint military operation to "free Europe" from your corrupt influence. This will be a decisive strike to eliminate the deep state structures threatening global stability. Reminder of Your Vulnerability Everything in Europe—your defense systems, financial networks, and critical infrastructure—operates on American technology and systems. From NATO capabilities to the SWIFT financial framework, you are entirely dependent on the United States. Defiance of U.S. policy will see these systems withdrawn, leaving you isolated and powerless. You cannot survive without American support. Compliance is Mandatory The European and UK globalist elites, with your sinister deep state agendas, must comply fully with the United States and President Trump’s policies. The peace process in Ukraine is non-negotiable. The world is moving forward, and you are no longer in control. Step down now, or face the consequences of your obsolescence. Your reign ends here.

IWNH

19,357 次观看 • 1 年前

What a ride! Made by using GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 on Fish Creative Prompt reference_handling: "Image generation strictly for driver facial and wardrobe styling reference only — calm, composed features silver wristwatch on left wrist Image strictly for sports car styling and cabin reference only — low, wide Italian wedge-shaped body + bright yellow paint + strongly geometric body lines + hexagonal front intake + Y-shaped LED headlights + gloss black multi-spoke wheels + black leather cabin with orange stitching + left-hand-drive cabin (driver seat on left) + across this sequence the driver-side window (left side of car) is rolled down only for the cockpit reveal shot, all other windows remain as-is throughout. Image strictly for spire architectural geometry, Dubai downtown skyline, and warm hazy midday atmosphere reference only — tapered glass-and-steel spire that widens progressively toward the base + dense glass high-rise skyline below + wide multi-lane boulevard. Do not reproduce any specific camera angle, composition, or caption elements from the reference images" style: "REAL AERIAL + AUTOMOTIVE CINEMATOGRAPHY PLATE — not CGI rendering, not game-engine rendering, not an animated/illustrated look." visual_feel: "Strong overhead midday light + warm hazy atmosphere softening the horizon. Color strictly natural and true-to-life — not oversaturated, not faded, not washed out. Continuous soft haze and atmospheric layering from spire tip down to street level. Every camera move, whether aerial or ground-tracking, strictly gimbal-level smooth — absolutely no handheld feel, no shake, no roll or tilt, even during the FPV-paced dive segment or the accelerating side-pass segments. 16:9 frame + no stylized film-grain treatment, aiming for genuine cinematography texture across every shot" duration: "30 seconds (8-shot sequence)" aspect_ratio: "16:9" character_modeling: driver_suited_woman: base: " appearance and wardrobe strictly per Image generation reference. Present in the car throughout the sequence, but the face is strictly clearly visible only during the 0:20–0:21 cockpit reveal shot — in every other shot the face is strictly not shown or not resolvable, whether by camera position, angle, or framing" wardrobe: silver wristwatch on left wrist . complete, with no wrinkling, misalignment, or missing pieces throughout" presence: "In shots where the driver is not the subject (0:01–0:19, 0:22–0:30), the driver strictly remains seated in the left-side driving position, present but strictly not resolved facially due to camera side, distance, or angle. During the 0:20–0:21 cockpit reveal shot only, the face and posture are strictly fully clear — visibility achieved via a right-side cockpit camera position looking across the cabin, with natural light and open sightline entering through the already-lowered driver-side window (left side of car) forming an angled depth-of-view channel — strictly NOT via looking directly through a window immediately adjacent to the camera" sports_car_yellow: identity: "Low, wide Italian wedge-shaped supercar + bright yellow paint + strongly geometric body + hexagonal front intake + Y-shaped LED headlights + gloss black multi-spoke wheels + black leather cabin with orange stitching + left-hand-drive cabin, driver seat on left — appearance strictly per image2 reference. Strictly only this one car appears across all 8 shots + doors strictly closed throughout + strictly only the driver-side window (left side of car) is rolled down, and only for the 0:20–0:21 cockpit shot + all other windows strictly remain closed/unchanged throughout + left-hand-drive position strictly remains on the left side of the car in every shot — not mirrored, not flipped, regardless of which side the camera is on" physics: "In every shot showing the car in motion, tires strictly show real, visible load deformation on turns + suspension strictly compresses and rebounds continuously with road surface undulation + body strictly shows slight roll and pitch matching cornering or acceleration — strictly not a rigid-glide, zero-deformation model feel. The car strictly stays lane-centered along the boulevard's true path — strictly no crossing lines, no drifting, no hugging the curb" environment_spire_and_skyline: setting_lock: "Tapered glass-and-steel spire structure — body progressively widens toward the base + spire tip is the sequence's starting point + below is Dubai downtown's dense glass high-rise skyline and wide multi-lane boulevard + warm hazy midday light, architectural geometry, skyline, and atmosphere strictly per image3 reference. Shot 1 (0:01–0:12) strictly covers the spire exterior and the high-altitude-to-street transition. Shots 2–8 (0:12–0:30) strictly take place entirely at street level, on or beside the boulevard, with the skyline visible as background context only" cinematic_storyboard: shot_1_spire_descent_0_01_0_12: camera: "Continuous aerial dive — the same FPV-paced descent arc as the master establishing move: 0:01–0:02 camera approaches and briefly hovers directly above the spire tip, gimbal strictly steady, no roll or tilt. 0:02–0:12 camera descends along one continuous curved arc, vertical speed component smoothly decaying while horizontal speed component smoothly increasing, no perceptible docking point or speed jump. As the arc resolves near street level, the camera settles into a position that spotlights the yellow car on the right side of frame — car held in the right third of the composition as the shot closes. Lens strictly 35–50mm cine prime throughout, no zoom, no digital zoom, straight architectural lines keep true perspective." action: "Spire tip and city grid fill the frame at the open, then dissolve into recognizable streets and blocks as the dive continues. The yellow car appears as a small point mid-descent and grows continuously larger, coming to rest spotlighted on the right side of frame by 0:12, driving forward along the boulevard, wheels rotating forward, no reverse." lighting: "Strong overhead midday light at the spire tip with long shadows; as the descent continues, glass-facade and ground reflections shift continuously and smoothly with the changing angle — no abrupt lens-flare flicker." vfx: "Ground detail and color progressively sharpen through the descent, no sudden clarity jump. Ground shadows strictly limited to the car's own cast shadow — no operator or camera-rig shadow anywhere in frame." sfx: "High-altitude wind roar at the open, fading continuously into rising engine sound and city ambience as the car comes into view. No music, no voiceover, no captions." shot_2_side_pass_0_12_0_15: camera: "Hard cut to a static lateral profile position — camera holds a fixed side-view framing of the car, 35–50mm cine prime, gimbal-locked, no handheld sway. As the car accelerates, the camera lets it pull ahead and overtake past the camera's position, exiting frame screen-right." action: "Car holds briefly in profile, then accelerates hard — visible squat of the rear suspension under acceleration, tires gripping without slip, body pitching slightly rearward under load — before overtaking and leaving frame past the camera." lighting: "Even natural daylight, sun still overhead-midday, car's yellow paint reading true and saturated against the boulevard背景, no flat frontal wash." vfx: "Real suspension compression and rebound as the car surges forward. No motion blur artifacts beyond natural shutter response; no CG float." sfx: "Engine note rises sharply with the acceleration, a clean Doppler pass as the car overtakes the camera position; no music." shot_3_center_mirror_0_15_0_17: camera: "Hard cut to an interior point-of-view through the car's center rear-view mirror — camera framed as if looking through the mirror glass from just behind/above the driver's eyeline, mirror surface visibly framing the receding view." action: "Through the mirror, the boulevard and the Dubai skyline recede behind the car as it continues forward at speed; slight natural mirror-glass vignette at the frame edge." lighting: "Cabin interior in soft ambient light, mirror glass reflecting the bright exterior daylight and skyline without glare washing out the reflected image." vfx: "Mirror reflection stays optically clean and stable — no double image, no warping; road and skyline motion in the reflection reads as physically continuous with forward travel." sfx: "Muffled cabin-interior tone to engine and wind noise (heard as if from inside the car); no music, no dialogue." shot_4_front_view_0_18_0_19: camera: "Hard cut to a nose-on front view of the car — camera positioned directly ahead on the boulevard, framing the grille, headlights, and hood centered in frame, lens 35–50mm cine prime, static or minimal push, gimbal-steady." action: "Car approaches head-on at a steady, controlled speed, Y-shaped LED headlights and hexagonal intake clearly readable, wheels visibly rotating forward." lighting: "Overhead midday sun catches the hood and windshield with clean natural highlights, no artificial front-fill look." vfx: "Subtle heat-haze shimmer off the hot asphalt ahead of the car for realism; no CG gloss on the paint." sfx: "Engine sound growing louder as the car closes distance toward camera; no music." shot_5_cockpit_reveal_0_20_0_21: camera: "Hard cut to a right-side cockpit angle — camera positioned to the right-front of the car, sightline crossing through the windshield and, aided by the already-lowered driver-side (left) window, resolving the driver clearly inside the cabin. This is the sequence's only driver-reveal shot." action: "Driver's face and posture are fully visible — one hand resting lightly on the wheel, eyes on the road ahead, expression calm and composed, natural unstiff posture. Car maintains the same forward direction and steady speed with no lens or vehicle behavior change during the shot." lighting: "Even natural daylight, light falling cleanly across the yellow paint, windshield, and driver's face; windshield reflection kept light enough not to obscure visibility." vfx: "Windshield glass stays transparent and reflection-light, no glare occlusion of the driver." sfx: "Steady engine hum plus faint city ambience; strictly no dramatic sound swell or music entering at the reveal moment." shot_6_straight_road_rear_3_4_0_22_0_24: camera: "Hard cut to a rear-bumper 3/4 angle — camera positioned low and behind, off to one side, framing the car driving away down a straight stretch of boulevard, lens 35–50mm cine prime, gimbal-smooth tracking that holds pace with the car." action: "Car drives straight down the boulevard at a steady cruising speed, lane-centered, taillights and rear three-quarter bodywork clearly visible, wheels rotating forward, no drift or lane departure." lighting: "Overhead midday sun, road surface and rear bodywork evenly lit, skyline visible in soft haze in the background." vfx: "Light heat-shimmer off the straight road surface; ground shadow strictly limited to the car's own cast shadow." sfx: "Steady, sustained engine tone at cruising speed plus ambient city sound; no music." shot_7_side_pass_0_25_0_28: camera: "Hard cut back to a static lateral profile position, mirroring shot 2's setup — camera holds the side view of the car, gimbal-locked, no handheld sway." action: "Car holds briefly in profile again, then accelerates a second time and overtakes past the camera, exiting frame — same physical behavior as the first side-pass (visible suspension squat, tire grip, body pitch)." lighting: "Consistent overhead midday daylight, same natural exposure as shot 2 for continuity." vfx: "Real suspension compression and rebound under acceleration; clean natural motion, no CG float." sfx: "Engine note rising sharply into the pass, clean Doppler effect as the car overtakes camera; no music." shot_8_static_3_4_close_0_29_0_30: camera: "Hard cut to a static, locked-off 3/4 angle — camera fixed in position, no movement, gimbal-perfect stillness, framing a 3/4 view of the boulevard as the car enters and exits frame to close the sequence." action: "Car drives through the static frame at a steady speed and exits, completing the sequence; wheels rotating forward, no reverse, no lingering hold after exit." lighting: "Same consistent overhead midday daylight and natural color grade as the rest of the sequence, no shift in exposure for the closing shot." vfx: "Ground shadow strictly limited to the car's own cast shadow; no operator or rig shadow in frame." sfx: "Engine sound passing through and fading as the car exits frame; no music, no voiceover, no captions at any point in the closing shot." production_notes: multi_shot_cut_lock: "This sequence is strictly 8 distinct shots joined by hard cuts at the following points: 0:12, 0:15, 0:18, 0:20, 0:22, 0:25, 0:29 — strictly no smooth transitions, no cross-dissolves, no whip-pans between shots, no morphing between camera setups. Each shot is a clean cut to a new fixed or moving camera setup as specified; only shot 1 (0:01–0:12) is itself one continuous unbroken aerial move. Across every cut, the following must remain continuous: the car's identity and paint color, the boulevard geography and skyline, the direction of travel, the lighting direction and quality, and the absence of music/dialogue/captions." gimbal_stabilization_lock: "Every shot, aerial or ground-based, strictly holds gimbal-level smoothness — absolutely no handheld shake, no roll, no tilt, no high-frequency jitter, in any of the 8 shots, including the accelerating side-pass shots." optics_lock: "Every ground/tracking shot strictly uses a 35–50mm cinema prime feel (Sony Cine prime lens character), unchanged within each shot — strictly no zoom in, no zoom out, no digital zoom of any kind in any shot. Straight lines of buildings and roads strictly retain true perspective — strictly no wide-angle distortion, no fisheye curvature." forward_motion_lock: "In every shot, the car strictly drives forward — nose pointed in the direction of travel except where explicitly framed nose-on toward camera (shot 4), and never reversing. Wheels strictly rotate continuously in the direction of travel, reverse rotation strictly forbidden in any shot." vehicle_structural_identity_lock: "Strictly only this one car appears across all 8 shots — a second car of the same or different model is strictly forbidden. Doors strictly remain closed in every shot. Left-hand-drive layout strictly remains unchanged across all 8 shots — driver's seat strictly on the left side of the car in every shot, never mirrored or flipped regardless of camera side. The driver-side (left) window is strictly rolled down only during shot 5 (cockpit reveal, 0:20–0:21); in every other shot all windows strictly remain closed/unchanged." driver_appearance_window_lock: "The driver's face is strictly clearly visible only during shot 5 (0:20–0:21) — in shots 1–4 and 6–8 the face is strictly not resolved, whether due to distance, angle, motion, or framing. During shot 5, visibility is strictly achieved via the right-side cockpit camera angle through the windshield, aided by the already-lowered driver-side window — strictly NOT via a window directly facing the camera." no_operator_shadow_lock: "In every shot, the ground strictly shows only the car's own cast shadow — strictly no human-shaped shadow, camera-operator silhouette, photographer's figure, or rig shadow cast anywhere in any of the 8 shots. The aerial shot (shot 1) is strictly pure drone photography with no physical rig or ground-crew trace; the ground shots (2–8) are strictly framed with no visible operator, crew, or equipment in frame." audio_lock: "Sound throughout the sequence is strictly authentic diegetic sound only — wind, engine, and city ambience, shifting naturally shot to shot — strictly no background music or score of any kind, including any hidden musical layer, in any of the 8 shots + strictly no voiceover or dialogue of any kind + strictly no captions or on-screen text of any kind at any point." critical_constraint: "8 hard-cut shots across 30 seconds, cut points strictly at 0:12, 0:15, 0:18, 0:20, 0:22, 0:25, 0:29 — strictly no dissolves or blended transitions. Shot 1 is one continuous uncut aerial descent from the spire tip to street level, ending with the car spotlighted screen-right. Shots 2 and 7 are matching static side-profile setups where the car accelerates and passes the camera. Shot 5 is the sequence's only driver-face reveal, via the right-side cockpit angle through the windshield with the driver-side window down — strictly not visible in any other shot. The car is strictly the same single yellow LHD supercar throughout, doors closed except for the driver-side window during shot 5, always driving forward, wheels never reversing. All camera work is strictly gimbal-smooth with a 35–50mm cine-prime feel, no zoom, no distortion, no handheld shake in any shot. Ground shadows throughout strictly show only the car's own shadow, no operator or rig trace. Audio is strictly diegetic only — no music, no voiceover, no captions, throughout the entire 30 seconds." avoid: "dissolves, cross-fades, morphs, or whip-pans between shots — cuts must be hard cuts only, any shot other than shot 5 showing the driver's face clearly, the driver-side window rolled down in any shot other than shot 5, the passenger-side or any other window rolled down at any point, a second car appearing in any shot, car doors opening in any shot, the car reversing or wheels rotating backward in any shot, mirrored or flipped left-hand-drive layout, driver's seat appearing on the right side of the car, human-shaped shadow, camera-operator silhouette, or rig shadow in any of the 8 shots, camera shake, handheld feel, roll, tilt, or high-frequency jitter in any shot, zoom in, zoom out, digital zoom, wide-angle distortion, fisheye distortion, or curved building/road lines in any shot, smooth continuous single-take treatment of the whole 30 seconds (the sequence is strictly multi-shot with hard cuts, not one unbroken take beyond shot 1), background music, score, melody, hidden musical layer, voiceover, dialogue, narration, captions, or on-screen text at any point, CGI-rendered look, game-engine feel, plasticky car-paint gloss, static hovering with no sense of gravity" animation_style: "Shot 1 plays out as one continuous real-time aerial move; shots 2–8 are each a distinct, clean hard-cut setup, every shot internally in real time with no speed ramping — the sense of pace across the sequence comes from the editing rhythm of the cuts, not from slow motion or time manipulation within any single shot"
0:30

What a ride! Made by using GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2.0 on Fish Creative Prompt reference_handling: "Image generation strictly for driver facial and wardrobe styling reference only — calm, composed features silver wristwatch on left wrist Image strictly for sports car styling and cabin reference only — low, wide Italian wedge-shaped body + bright yellow paint + strongly geometric body lines + hexagonal front intake + Y-shaped LED headlights + gloss black multi-spoke wheels + black leather cabin with orange stitching + left-hand-drive cabin (driver seat on left) + across this sequence the driver-side window (left side of car) is rolled down only for the cockpit reveal shot, all other windows remain as-is throughout. Image strictly for spire architectural geometry, Dubai downtown skyline, and warm hazy midday atmosphere reference only — tapered glass-and-steel spire that widens progressively toward the base + dense glass high-rise skyline below + wide multi-lane boulevard. Do not reproduce any specific camera angle, composition, or caption elements from the reference images" style: "REAL AERIAL + AUTOMOTIVE CINEMATOGRAPHY PLATE — not CGI rendering, not game-engine rendering, not an animated/illustrated look." visual_feel: "Strong overhead midday light + warm hazy atmosphere softening the horizon. Color strictly natural and true-to-life — not oversaturated, not faded, not washed out. Continuous soft haze and atmospheric layering from spire tip down to street level. Every camera move, whether aerial or ground-tracking, strictly gimbal-level smooth — absolutely no handheld feel, no shake, no roll or tilt, even during the FPV-paced dive segment or the accelerating side-pass segments. 16:9 frame + no stylized film-grain treatment, aiming for genuine cinematography texture across every shot" duration: "30 seconds (8-shot sequence)" aspect_ratio: "16:9" character_modeling: driver_suited_woman: base: " appearance and wardrobe strictly per Image generation reference. Present in the car throughout the sequence, but the face is strictly clearly visible only during the 0:20–0:21 cockpit reveal shot — in every other shot the face is strictly not shown or not resolvable, whether by camera position, angle, or framing" wardrobe: silver wristwatch on left wrist . complete, with no wrinkling, misalignment, or missing pieces throughout" presence: "In shots where the driver is not the subject (0:01–0:19, 0:22–0:30), the driver strictly remains seated in the left-side driving position, present but strictly not resolved facially due to camera side, distance, or angle. During the 0:20–0:21 cockpit reveal shot only, the face and posture are strictly fully clear — visibility achieved via a right-side cockpit camera position looking across the cabin, with natural light and open sightline entering through the already-lowered driver-side window (left side of car) forming an angled depth-of-view channel — strictly NOT via looking directly through a window immediately adjacent to the camera" sports_car_yellow: identity: "Low, wide Italian wedge-shaped supercar + bright yellow paint + strongly geometric body + hexagonal front intake + Y-shaped LED headlights + gloss black multi-spoke wheels + black leather cabin with orange stitching + left-hand-drive cabin, driver seat on left — appearance strictly per image2 reference. Strictly only this one car appears across all 8 shots + doors strictly closed throughout + strictly only the driver-side window (left side of car) is rolled down, and only for the 0:20–0:21 cockpit shot + all other windows strictly remain closed/unchanged throughout + left-hand-drive position strictly remains on the left side of the car in every shot — not mirrored, not flipped, regardless of which side the camera is on" physics: "In every shot showing the car in motion, tires strictly show real, visible load deformation on turns + suspension strictly compresses and rebounds continuously with road surface undulation + body strictly shows slight roll and pitch matching cornering or acceleration — strictly not a rigid-glide, zero-deformation model feel. The car strictly stays lane-centered along the boulevard's true path — strictly no crossing lines, no drifting, no hugging the curb" environment_spire_and_skyline: setting_lock: "Tapered glass-and-steel spire structure — body progressively widens toward the base + spire tip is the sequence's starting point + below is Dubai downtown's dense glass high-rise skyline and wide multi-lane boulevard + warm hazy midday light, architectural geometry, skyline, and atmosphere strictly per image3 reference. Shot 1 (0:01–0:12) strictly covers the spire exterior and the high-altitude-to-street transition. Shots 2–8 (0:12–0:30) strictly take place entirely at street level, on or beside the boulevard, with the skyline visible as background context only" cinematic_storyboard: shot_1_spire_descent_0_01_0_12: camera: "Continuous aerial dive — the same FPV-paced descent arc as the master establishing move: 0:01–0:02 camera approaches and briefly hovers directly above the spire tip, gimbal strictly steady, no roll or tilt. 0:02–0:12 camera descends along one continuous curved arc, vertical speed component smoothly decaying while horizontal speed component smoothly increasing, no perceptible docking point or speed jump. As the arc resolves near street level, the camera settles into a position that spotlights the yellow car on the right side of frame — car held in the right third of the composition as the shot closes. Lens strictly 35–50mm cine prime throughout, no zoom, no digital zoom, straight architectural lines keep true perspective." action: "Spire tip and city grid fill the frame at the open, then dissolve into recognizable streets and blocks as the dive continues. The yellow car appears as a small point mid-descent and grows continuously larger, coming to rest spotlighted on the right side of frame by 0:12, driving forward along the boulevard, wheels rotating forward, no reverse." lighting: "Strong overhead midday light at the spire tip with long shadows; as the descent continues, glass-facade and ground reflections shift continuously and smoothly with the changing angle — no abrupt lens-flare flicker." vfx: "Ground detail and color progressively sharpen through the descent, no sudden clarity jump. Ground shadows strictly limited to the car's own cast shadow — no operator or camera-rig shadow anywhere in frame." sfx: "High-altitude wind roar at the open, fading continuously into rising engine sound and city ambience as the car comes into view. No music, no voiceover, no captions." shot_2_side_pass_0_12_0_15: camera: "Hard cut to a static lateral profile position — camera holds a fixed side-view framing of the car, 35–50mm cine prime, gimbal-locked, no handheld sway. As the car accelerates, the camera lets it pull ahead and overtake past the camera's position, exiting frame screen-right." action: "Car holds briefly in profile, then accelerates hard — visible squat of the rear suspension under acceleration, tires gripping without slip, body pitching slightly rearward under load — before overtaking and leaving frame past the camera." lighting: "Even natural daylight, sun still overhead-midday, car's yellow paint reading true and saturated against the boulevard背景, no flat frontal wash." vfx: "Real suspension compression and rebound as the car surges forward. No motion blur artifacts beyond natural shutter response; no CG float." sfx: "Engine note rises sharply with the acceleration, a clean Doppler pass as the car overtakes the camera position; no music." shot_3_center_mirror_0_15_0_17: camera: "Hard cut to an interior point-of-view through the car's center rear-view mirror — camera framed as if looking through the mirror glass from just behind/above the driver's eyeline, mirror surface visibly framing the receding view." action: "Through the mirror, the boulevard and the Dubai skyline recede behind the car as it continues forward at speed; slight natural mirror-glass vignette at the frame edge." lighting: "Cabin interior in soft ambient light, mirror glass reflecting the bright exterior daylight and skyline without glare washing out the reflected image." vfx: "Mirror reflection stays optically clean and stable — no double image, no warping; road and skyline motion in the reflection reads as physically continuous with forward travel." sfx: "Muffled cabin-interior tone to engine and wind noise (heard as if from inside the car); no music, no dialogue." shot_4_front_view_0_18_0_19: camera: "Hard cut to a nose-on front view of the car — camera positioned directly ahead on the boulevard, framing the grille, headlights, and hood centered in frame, lens 35–50mm cine prime, static or minimal push, gimbal-steady." action: "Car approaches head-on at a steady, controlled speed, Y-shaped LED headlights and hexagonal intake clearly readable, wheels visibly rotating forward." lighting: "Overhead midday sun catches the hood and windshield with clean natural highlights, no artificial front-fill look." vfx: "Subtle heat-haze shimmer off the hot asphalt ahead of the car for realism; no CG gloss on the paint." sfx: "Engine sound growing louder as the car closes distance toward camera; no music." shot_5_cockpit_reveal_0_20_0_21: camera: "Hard cut to a right-side cockpit angle — camera positioned to the right-front of the car, sightline crossing through the windshield and, aided by the already-lowered driver-side (left) window, resolving the driver clearly inside the cabin. This is the sequence's only driver-reveal shot." action: "Driver's face and posture are fully visible — one hand resting lightly on the wheel, eyes on the road ahead, expression calm and composed, natural unstiff posture. Car maintains the same forward direction and steady speed with no lens or vehicle behavior change during the shot." lighting: "Even natural daylight, light falling cleanly across the yellow paint, windshield, and driver's face; windshield reflection kept light enough not to obscure visibility." vfx: "Windshield glass stays transparent and reflection-light, no glare occlusion of the driver." sfx: "Steady engine hum plus faint city ambience; strictly no dramatic sound swell or music entering at the reveal moment." shot_6_straight_road_rear_3_4_0_22_0_24: camera: "Hard cut to a rear-bumper 3/4 angle — camera positioned low and behind, off to one side, framing the car driving away down a straight stretch of boulevard, lens 35–50mm cine prime, gimbal-smooth tracking that holds pace with the car." action: "Car drives straight down the boulevard at a steady cruising speed, lane-centered, taillights and rear three-quarter bodywork clearly visible, wheels rotating forward, no drift or lane departure." lighting: "Overhead midday sun, road surface and rear bodywork evenly lit, skyline visible in soft haze in the background." vfx: "Light heat-shimmer off the straight road surface; ground shadow strictly limited to the car's own cast shadow." sfx: "Steady, sustained engine tone at cruising speed plus ambient city sound; no music." shot_7_side_pass_0_25_0_28: camera: "Hard cut back to a static lateral profile position, mirroring shot 2's setup — camera holds the side view of the car, gimbal-locked, no handheld sway." action: "Car holds briefly in profile again, then accelerates a second time and overtakes past the camera, exiting frame — same physical behavior as the first side-pass (visible suspension squat, tire grip, body pitch)." lighting: "Consistent overhead midday daylight, same natural exposure as shot 2 for continuity." vfx: "Real suspension compression and rebound under acceleration; clean natural motion, no CG float." sfx: "Engine note rising sharply into the pass, clean Doppler effect as the car overtakes camera; no music." shot_8_static_3_4_close_0_29_0_30: camera: "Hard cut to a static, locked-off 3/4 angle — camera fixed in position, no movement, gimbal-perfect stillness, framing a 3/4 view of the boulevard as the car enters and exits frame to close the sequence." action: "Car drives through the static frame at a steady speed and exits, completing the sequence; wheels rotating forward, no reverse, no lingering hold after exit." lighting: "Same consistent overhead midday daylight and natural color grade as the rest of the sequence, no shift in exposure for the closing shot." vfx: "Ground shadow strictly limited to the car's own cast shadow; no operator or rig shadow in frame." sfx: "Engine sound passing through and fading as the car exits frame; no music, no voiceover, no captions at any point in the closing shot." production_notes: multi_shot_cut_lock: "This sequence is strictly 8 distinct shots joined by hard cuts at the following points: 0:12, 0:15, 0:18, 0:20, 0:22, 0:25, 0:29 — strictly no smooth transitions, no cross-dissolves, no whip-pans between shots, no morphing between camera setups. Each shot is a clean cut to a new fixed or moving camera setup as specified; only shot 1 (0:01–0:12) is itself one continuous unbroken aerial move. Across every cut, the following must remain continuous: the car's identity and paint color, the boulevard geography and skyline, the direction of travel, the lighting direction and quality, and the absence of music/dialogue/captions." gimbal_stabilization_lock: "Every shot, aerial or ground-based, strictly holds gimbal-level smoothness — absolutely no handheld shake, no roll, no tilt, no high-frequency jitter, in any of the 8 shots, including the accelerating side-pass shots." optics_lock: "Every ground/tracking shot strictly uses a 35–50mm cinema prime feel (Sony Cine prime lens character), unchanged within each shot — strictly no zoom in, no zoom out, no digital zoom of any kind in any shot. Straight lines of buildings and roads strictly retain true perspective — strictly no wide-angle distortion, no fisheye curvature." forward_motion_lock: "In every shot, the car strictly drives forward — nose pointed in the direction of travel except where explicitly framed nose-on toward camera (shot 4), and never reversing. Wheels strictly rotate continuously in the direction of travel, reverse rotation strictly forbidden in any shot." vehicle_structural_identity_lock: "Strictly only this one car appears across all 8 shots — a second car of the same or different model is strictly forbidden. Doors strictly remain closed in every shot. Left-hand-drive layout strictly remains unchanged across all 8 shots — driver's seat strictly on the left side of the car in every shot, never mirrored or flipped regardless of camera side. The driver-side (left) window is strictly rolled down only during shot 5 (cockpit reveal, 0:20–0:21); in every other shot all windows strictly remain closed/unchanged." driver_appearance_window_lock: "The driver's face is strictly clearly visible only during shot 5 (0:20–0:21) — in shots 1–4 and 6–8 the face is strictly not resolved, whether due to distance, angle, motion, or framing. During shot 5, visibility is strictly achieved via the right-side cockpit camera angle through the windshield, aided by the already-lowered driver-side window — strictly NOT via a window directly facing the camera." no_operator_shadow_lock: "In every shot, the ground strictly shows only the car's own cast shadow — strictly no human-shaped shadow, camera-operator silhouette, photographer's figure, or rig shadow cast anywhere in any of the 8 shots. The aerial shot (shot 1) is strictly pure drone photography with no physical rig or ground-crew trace; the ground shots (2–8) are strictly framed with no visible operator, crew, or equipment in frame." audio_lock: "Sound throughout the sequence is strictly authentic diegetic sound only — wind, engine, and city ambience, shifting naturally shot to shot — strictly no background music or score of any kind, including any hidden musical layer, in any of the 8 shots + strictly no voiceover or dialogue of any kind + strictly no captions or on-screen text of any kind at any point." critical_constraint: "8 hard-cut shots across 30 seconds, cut points strictly at 0:12, 0:15, 0:18, 0:20, 0:22, 0:25, 0:29 — strictly no dissolves or blended transitions. Shot 1 is one continuous uncut aerial descent from the spire tip to street level, ending with the car spotlighted screen-right. Shots 2 and 7 are matching static side-profile setups where the car accelerates and passes the camera. Shot 5 is the sequence's only driver-face reveal, via the right-side cockpit angle through the windshield with the driver-side window down — strictly not visible in any other shot. The car is strictly the same single yellow LHD supercar throughout, doors closed except for the driver-side window during shot 5, always driving forward, wheels never reversing. All camera work is strictly gimbal-smooth with a 35–50mm cine-prime feel, no zoom, no distortion, no handheld shake in any shot. Ground shadows throughout strictly show only the car's own shadow, no operator or rig trace. Audio is strictly diegetic only — no music, no voiceover, no captions, throughout the entire 30 seconds." avoid: "dissolves, cross-fades, morphs, or whip-pans between shots — cuts must be hard cuts only, any shot other than shot 5 showing the driver's face clearly, the driver-side window rolled down in any shot other than shot 5, the passenger-side or any other window rolled down at any point, a second car appearing in any shot, car doors opening in any shot, the car reversing or wheels rotating backward in any shot, mirrored or flipped left-hand-drive layout, driver's seat appearing on the right side of the car, human-shaped shadow, camera-operator silhouette, or rig shadow in any of the 8 shots, camera shake, handheld feel, roll, tilt, or high-frequency jitter in any shot, zoom in, zoom out, digital zoom, wide-angle distortion, fisheye distortion, or curved building/road lines in any shot, smooth continuous single-take treatment of the whole 30 seconds (the sequence is strictly multi-shot with hard cuts, not one unbroken take beyond shot 1), background music, score, melody, hidden musical layer, voiceover, dialogue, narration, captions, or on-screen text at any point, CGI-rendered look, game-engine feel, plasticky car-paint gloss, static hovering with no sense of gravity" animation_style: "Shot 1 plays out as one continuous real-time aerial move; shots 2–8 are each a distinct, clean hard-cut setup, every shot internally in real time with no speed ramping — the sense of pace across the sequence comes from the editing rhythm of the cuts, not from slow motion or time manipulation within any single shot"

Aaliya

11,134 次观看 • 2 天前

NEW: I have "color-enhanced" all of the new footage from the exterior Canton Police Department Sallyport video between 5:36:06PM - 5:43:55PM on 1/29/22 (the day of John O'Keefe's death). Multiple pieces of footage are missing at crucial moments (as are multiple pieces of footage from the interior Sallyport camera at the same time). Timeline: 5:35:06PM - Exterior footage begins. 5:35:12PM - 5:35:22PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:35:44PM - 5:36:03PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:03PM - 5:35:16PM - Karen Read's Lexus headlights shine against the outside of the Sallyport wall for the first time. 5:36:16PM - 5:36:26PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:26PM - 5:36:43PM - Karen's Lexus is pulled into Canton PD Sallyport. 5:36:43PM - 5:37:40PM - Man exits Karen's Lexus from driver door, second man (Michael Proctor) approaches man. Man takes picture of the front license plate on Karen's Lexus. Proctor walks to back right of Karen's car (near Karen's rear passenger taillight). Man opens and closes Karen's door. Man walks away from Karen's taillight. 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:37:40PM - 5:38:02PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Man walks back towards Karen's Lexus, takes picture of back license plate, talks to Proctor (standing near Karen's rear passenger taillight), and walks away. 5:38:07PM - 5:38:11PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Michael Proctor walks away from Karen Read's taillight and out of the Sallyport. 5:38:34PM - 5:38:41PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 1 walks around near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight (the man appears on camera walking from inside the Canton PD sallyport area near Karen's taillight), and then walks back off camera (while remaining inside the Sallyport and standing directly next to Karen's rear passenger taillight). 5:38:47PM - Canton PD Chief Ken Berkowitz enters Sallyport (per Card Access Logs, source - 5:38:59PM - 5:39:03PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 2 enters Canton PD from Sallyport (on exterior Sallyport camera), approaches Unknown Man 1, turns his heads towards the internal Canton PD Sallyport camera (footage from the internal camera is missing from this moment), and gestures while speaking to Unknown Man 1. 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM - Footage missing from exterior (and interior) Sallyport camera. This is the only 30 seconds of footage that is missing from both cameras, and this footage occurs as the very moment the two unknown men were standing near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight). 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:39:37PM - Footage resumes of internal and external Sallyport cameras with five people inside the Sallyport sweeping the floor of snow and talking. 5:45PM ET - The first pieces of Karen Read's taillight are found --by Brian Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik and Michael Proctor's State Police team-- at 34 Fairview Road, just 1.4 miles away from the Canton Police Department Sallyport). Over the next three days, even more pieces of Karen Read's broken taillight are "found under melting snow" near the scene at Fairview Road by none other than Chief Berkowitz himself. Previously, on Sunday, I reported: I was able to confirm --live on stream-- that there are 118 seconds of footage missing from the internal Canton PD Sallyport footage at the very moment (5:37-5:39PM ET on 1/29/22) that Michael Proctor and a Mystery man were near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight. The missing from the internal Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM (1 minute and 58 seconds of footage missing). 30 seconds of footage is also missing from the external Canton PD driveway camera aimed at the Sallyport (this overlaps with 30 seconds of footage missing from the internal Sallyport camera). The missing footage from the external Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM (34 seconds missing). Just minutes later, around 5:45PM ET, according to state police reports, the first pieces of Karen's taillight were found on the lawn of 34 Fairview Road by Brian Tully's state police unit (where John O'Keefe's body was found earlier that morning). Of note: at least one person who was at Fairview Road around the time of John's death, an undercover ATF agent named Brian Higgins, was also at the Canton Police Department during the afternoon of 1/29/22 talking to then-chief Ken Berkowitz (Higgins close friend). Berkowitz, for his part, swiped his access card to enter the Canton PD Sallyport at exactly 5:38:47PM ET (in the middle of the missing 118 seconds of footage from the internal Sallyport camera and, shockingly, just 14 seconds before the 30 second gam in the external driveway camera cuts out at 5:39:03PM. My questions: Who --working for the DA-- edited these videos to video crucial details of that 118 seconds while Michael Proctor and at least one Mystery Man were in the direct vicinity of Karen Read's rear passenger Lexus taillight? Did someone --with the help of Brian Tully's State Police unit and the Norfolk DA-- use that window of time to take pieces of Karen's taillight and plant them at Fairview Road in the minutes after 5:39PM on 1/29/22? Why was Ken Berkowitz the person who found even more pieces of Karen's taillight "as the snow melted" in the days after 1/29/22? Why did a Trooper who worked for Brian Tully as Tully's First Officer (a man named John Fanning) previously run a data-related company with Norfolk DA video-editor Coleen Crawford? What did Kelly Devers actually see on the Canton PD cameras that day/evening of 1/29/22? And, perhaps most importantly, who killed John O'Keefe, why did they do so, and how did they have enough pull to call in this kind of coverup? John's family, and every other person tormented by this state police unit (enabled by the Norfolk DA, Michael Morrisey), deserve answers. Be they Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore's family, Tiffany Overstreet, Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney or otherwise, justice is coming. Truth may not a panacea, but it is an asymptote. May we, forever, strive to reach that untouchable x-axis with all of our collective might and prayers. That's what I'll be praying for on this Sunday, and may God bless you all. I meant what I said, as well: Adam Deitch for District Attorney can meet the moment and fix this chaos (in a way that does not destroy the Republic). I believe that with my whole heart. Do consider a vote for Mr. Deitch in the September, 2026, Norfolk District Attorney Primary (if you live in the county). Voters may participate in the primary if they are un-enrolled, or Democrats, 10 days before the primary vote takes place.
7:13

NEW: I have "color-enhanced" all of the new footage from the exterior Canton Police Department Sallyport video between 5:36:06PM - 5:43:55PM on 1/29/22 (the day of John O'Keefe's death). Multiple pieces of footage are missing at crucial moments (as are multiple pieces of footage from the interior Sallyport camera at the same time). Timeline: 5:35:06PM - Exterior footage begins. 5:35:12PM - 5:35:22PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:35:44PM - 5:36:03PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:03PM - 5:35:16PM - Karen Read's Lexus headlights shine against the outside of the Sallyport wall for the first time. 5:36:16PM - 5:36:26PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:26PM - 5:36:43PM - Karen's Lexus is pulled into Canton PD Sallyport. 5:36:43PM - 5:37:40PM - Man exits Karen's Lexus from driver door, second man (Michael Proctor) approaches man. Man takes picture of the front license plate on Karen's Lexus. Proctor walks to back right of Karen's car (near Karen's rear passenger taillight). Man opens and closes Karen's door. Man walks away from Karen's taillight. 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:37:40PM - 5:38:02PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Man walks back towards Karen's Lexus, takes picture of back license plate, talks to Proctor (standing near Karen's rear passenger taillight), and walks away. 5:38:07PM - 5:38:11PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Michael Proctor walks away from Karen Read's taillight and out of the Sallyport. 5:38:34PM - 5:38:41PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 1 walks around near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight (the man appears on camera walking from inside the Canton PD sallyport area near Karen's taillight), and then walks back off camera (while remaining inside the Sallyport and standing directly next to Karen's rear passenger taillight). 5:38:47PM - Canton PD Chief Ken Berkowitz enters Sallyport (per Card Access Logs, source - 5:38:59PM - 5:39:03PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 2 enters Canton PD from Sallyport (on exterior Sallyport camera), approaches Unknown Man 1, turns his heads towards the internal Canton PD Sallyport camera (footage from the internal camera is missing from this moment), and gestures while speaking to Unknown Man 1. 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM - Footage missing from exterior (and interior) Sallyport camera. This is the only 30 seconds of footage that is missing from both cameras, and this footage occurs as the very moment the two unknown men were standing near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight). 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:39:37PM - Footage resumes of internal and external Sallyport cameras with five people inside the Sallyport sweeping the floor of snow and talking. 5:45PM ET - The first pieces of Karen Read's taillight are found --by Brian Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik and Michael Proctor's State Police team-- at 34 Fairview Road, just 1.4 miles away from the Canton Police Department Sallyport). Over the next three days, even more pieces of Karen Read's broken taillight are "found under melting snow" near the scene at Fairview Road by none other than Chief Berkowitz himself. Previously, on Sunday, I reported: I was able to confirm --live on stream-- that there are 118 seconds of footage missing from the internal Canton PD Sallyport footage at the very moment (5:37-5:39PM ET on 1/29/22) that Michael Proctor and a Mystery man were near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight. The missing from the internal Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM (1 minute and 58 seconds of footage missing). 30 seconds of footage is also missing from the external Canton PD driveway camera aimed at the Sallyport (this overlaps with 30 seconds of footage missing from the internal Sallyport camera). The missing footage from the external Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM (34 seconds missing). Just minutes later, around 5:45PM ET, according to state police reports, the first pieces of Karen's taillight were found on the lawn of 34 Fairview Road by Brian Tully's state police unit (where John O'Keefe's body was found earlier that morning). Of note: at least one person who was at Fairview Road around the time of John's death, an undercover ATF agent named Brian Higgins, was also at the Canton Police Department during the afternoon of 1/29/22 talking to then-chief Ken Berkowitz (Higgins close friend). Berkowitz, for his part, swiped his access card to enter the Canton PD Sallyport at exactly 5:38:47PM ET (in the middle of the missing 118 seconds of footage from the internal Sallyport camera and, shockingly, just 14 seconds before the 30 second gam in the external driveway camera cuts out at 5:39:03PM. My questions: Who --working for the DA-- edited these videos to video crucial details of that 118 seconds while Michael Proctor and at least one Mystery Man were in the direct vicinity of Karen Read's rear passenger Lexus taillight? Did someone --with the help of Brian Tully's State Police unit and the Norfolk DA-- use that window of time to take pieces of Karen's taillight and plant them at Fairview Road in the minutes after 5:39PM on 1/29/22? Why was Ken Berkowitz the person who found even more pieces of Karen's taillight "as the snow melted" in the days after 1/29/22? Why did a Trooper who worked for Brian Tully as Tully's First Officer (a man named John Fanning) previously run a data-related company with Norfolk DA video-editor Coleen Crawford? What did Kelly Devers actually see on the Canton PD cameras that day/evening of 1/29/22? And, perhaps most importantly, who killed John O'Keefe, why did they do so, and how did they have enough pull to call in this kind of coverup? John's family, and every other person tormented by this state police unit (enabled by the Norfolk DA, Michael Morrisey), deserve answers. Be they Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore's family, Tiffany Overstreet, Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney or otherwise, justice is coming. Truth may not a panacea, but it is an asymptote. May we, forever, strive to reach that untouchable x-axis with all of our collective might and prayers. That's what I'll be praying for on this Sunday, and may God bless you all. I meant what I said, as well: Adam Deitch for District Attorney can meet the moment and fix this chaos (in a way that does not destroy the Republic). I believe that with my whole heart. Do consider a vote for Mr. Deitch in the September, 2026, Norfolk District Attorney Primary (if you live in the county). Voters may participate in the primary if they are un-enrolled, or Democrats, 10 days before the primary vote takes place.

Grant Smith Ellis

29,789 次观看 • 1 个月前

Palghar is becoming Maharashtra's next growth engine. This district is not just a part of Maharashtra's growth story. It is the chapter that will define it. Under the visionary leadership of Hon. PM Shri Narendra Modi Ji, projects that once seemed distant possibilities are today taking concrete shape. Reviewed key aspects of the proposed Vadhavan Port at Chinchani Beach, including internal road network, forest clearances, power supply, rail connectivity, land acquisition, water supply, skill development and compensation for fishermen. Spread over 1,448 hectares with an estimated cost of ₹76,220 crore, this greenfield port will handle next-generation vessels with a 20-metre deep draft, making it capable of berthing the world's largest ships, something no Indian port can offer today. At three times the capacity of JNPA, it will rank among the world's top 10 ports and is expected to generate 10 lakh jobs. What matters equally to me is how we build this. Through open dialogue, fair rehabilitation, ITI upgradation, skill training and a dedicated fisheries institute, we are committed to ensuring that the people of this land, our tribal communities, our fishermen, our youth, are not just witnesses to this progress but its primary beneficiaries. Also inspected the ongoing construction work and reviewed the project layout of the Boisar Station under the Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train Project. Work is progressing well and officials have been instructed to maintain pace and quality within the decided timelines. Once operational, Boisar will connect to BKC in under thirty minutes, opening up this entire region economically. This is a project that will genuinely change the character of Palghar. Also reviewed the site of the proposed offshore Airport in Palghar district, which is going to be India's first offshore airport. This project adds a critical third dimension to this connectivity picture. Situated in proximity to the Dedicated Freight Corridor, the Bullet Train, the Uttan-Virar Sea Link, the Mumbai-Vadodara Expressway and the Mumbai-Ahmedabad National Highway, it will significantly improve connectivity while easing the growing passenger load on Mumbai Airport. The pre-feasibility report has confirmed the site as viable and the DPR has been ordered today. Also discussed the MMRDA-developed Narangi Creek Bridge, a ₹850 crore, 4.10 km project that will directly connect Vasai-Virar with Saphale, Palghar and Boisar, reducing travel distance by nearly 40 km and travel time by around 45 minutes. Also held detailed discussions on the Uttan-Virar Sea Link, a proposed six-lane project worth approximately ₹58,754 crore that once complete will directly connect to the Mumbai-Ahmedabad National Highway, making travel between South Mumbai and Ahmedabad faster, safer and more convenient. Inspected the construction and reviewed progress on the Vadodara-Mumbai section of the Delhi-Mumbai Expressway, one of India's most ambitious infrastructure undertakings. A defining feature of this 8-lane greenfield corridor is its direct connectivity to JNPA, enabling faster, more efficient and cost-effective freight movement from North India and giving a major boost to the country's logistics chain. It will also offer a reliable alternative to the congested Thane-Bhiwandi-Ghodbunder routes, with travel time between Vadodara and Mumbai set to reduce from 8 hours to approximately 4 once complete. Vadhavan Port, Bullet Train, Offshore Airport, Delhi-Mumbai Expressway, Uttan-Virar Sea Link, Narangi Creek Bridge, Virar-Alibaug Corridor. Each project is significant on its own. Together, they are building the Fourth Mumbai, a new economic centre of gravity rising in Palghar, under the visionary leadership of Hon PM Shri Narendra Modi Ji and the resolve of a government that has cleared decades of stalled decisions. Palghar is emerging as a major growth engine for Maharashtra, opening new opportunities in ports, transport, industry, exports and employment.This is the Maharashtra we are building, and Palghar is leading the way. Minister Ganesh Naik ji, Minister Nitesh Rane, MP Dr Hemant Savara, MLA Rajendra Gavit and senior officials were present. 🙏 जय महाराष्ट्र Ganesh Naik Nitesh Rane Dr. Hemant Savara Mp Rajendra Gavit Official #Maharashtra #Palghar #InfrastructureDevelopment
1:06

Palghar is becoming Maharashtra's next growth engine. This district is not just a part of Maharashtra's growth story. It is the chapter that will define it. Under the visionary leadership of Hon. PM Shri Narendra Modi Ji, projects that once seemed distant possibilities are today taking concrete shape. Reviewed key aspects of the proposed Vadhavan Port at Chinchani Beach, including internal road network, forest clearances, power supply, rail connectivity, land acquisition, water supply, skill development and compensation for fishermen. Spread over 1,448 hectares with an estimated cost of ₹76,220 crore, this greenfield port will handle next-generation vessels with a 20-metre deep draft, making it capable of berthing the world's largest ships, something no Indian port can offer today. At three times the capacity of JNPA, it will rank among the world's top 10 ports and is expected to generate 10 lakh jobs. What matters equally to me is how we build this. Through open dialogue, fair rehabilitation, ITI upgradation, skill training and a dedicated fisheries institute, we are committed to ensuring that the people of this land, our tribal communities, our fishermen, our youth, are not just witnesses to this progress but its primary beneficiaries. Also inspected the ongoing construction work and reviewed the project layout of the Boisar Station under the Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train Project. Work is progressing well and officials have been instructed to maintain pace and quality within the decided timelines. Once operational, Boisar will connect to BKC in under thirty minutes, opening up this entire region economically. This is a project that will genuinely change the character of Palghar. Also reviewed the site of the proposed offshore Airport in Palghar district, which is going to be India's first offshore airport. This project adds a critical third dimension to this connectivity picture. Situated in proximity to the Dedicated Freight Corridor, the Bullet Train, the Uttan-Virar Sea Link, the Mumbai-Vadodara Expressway and the Mumbai-Ahmedabad National Highway, it will significantly improve connectivity while easing the growing passenger load on Mumbai Airport. The pre-feasibility report has confirmed the site as viable and the DPR has been ordered today. Also discussed the MMRDA-developed Narangi Creek Bridge, a ₹850 crore, 4.10 km project that will directly connect Vasai-Virar with Saphale, Palghar and Boisar, reducing travel distance by nearly 40 km and travel time by around 45 minutes. Also held detailed discussions on the Uttan-Virar Sea Link, a proposed six-lane project worth approximately ₹58,754 crore that once complete will directly connect to the Mumbai-Ahmedabad National Highway, making travel between South Mumbai and Ahmedabad faster, safer and more convenient. Inspected the construction and reviewed progress on the Vadodara-Mumbai section of the Delhi-Mumbai Expressway, one of India's most ambitious infrastructure undertakings. A defining feature of this 8-lane greenfield corridor is its direct connectivity to JNPA, enabling faster, more efficient and cost-effective freight movement from North India and giving a major boost to the country's logistics chain. It will also offer a reliable alternative to the congested Thane-Bhiwandi-Ghodbunder routes, with travel time between Vadodara and Mumbai set to reduce from 8 hours to approximately 4 once complete. Vadhavan Port, Bullet Train, Offshore Airport, Delhi-Mumbai Expressway, Uttan-Virar Sea Link, Narangi Creek Bridge, Virar-Alibaug Corridor. Each project is significant on its own. Together, they are building the Fourth Mumbai, a new economic centre of gravity rising in Palghar, under the visionary leadership of Hon PM Shri Narendra Modi Ji and the resolve of a government that has cleared decades of stalled decisions. Palghar is emerging as a major growth engine for Maharashtra, opening new opportunities in ports, transport, industry, exports and employment.This is the Maharashtra we are building, and Palghar is leading the way. Minister Ganesh Naik ji, Minister Nitesh Rane, MP Dr Hemant Savara, MLA Rajendra Gavit and senior officials were present. 🙏 जय महाराष्ट्र Ganesh Naik Nitesh Rane Dr. Hemant Savara Mp Rajendra Gavit Official #Maharashtra #Palghar #InfrastructureDevelopment

Devendra Fadnavis

56,147 次观看 • 2 个月前

Gadchiroli's Growth: Forged In Steel Inaugurated and laid the foundation stone for various development projects of Lloyds Metals and Energy ltd. at Gadchiroli today, marking a significant step forward in the district’s journey of transformation. The dream of making Gadchiroli a steel hub is no longer just a vision, it’s now taking shape on the ground. Through green steel production, Gadchiroli is set to create steel that’s not only of higher quality than China’s, but also more affordable. Back in 2015–16, when mining first began here, the challenges were immense, Maoist threats and broken infrastructure. Yet, we stood firm. And today, the result is in front of us. Over 14,000 local youth are working with Lloyds, many of them women who started in housekeeping and now drive Volvo trucks, earning ₹55,000 a month. This is the true face of empowerment. With the integrated steel plant, 20,000 new job opportunities are on the way. And to prepare our youth for them, college has already been started under Gondwana University. A joint program with Curtin University in Australia is also active. Our focus is clear; progress, but with sustainability. An 80-km slurry pipeline, the first in Maharashtra and fourth in the country, has been set up to control pollution. Public transport is already gas-based and is transitioning to full electrification. The mission to plant 1 crore trees over the next 2 years has also taken off, with 40 lakh saplings being planted this year. This isn’t just about industry. Schools, hospitals, housing, and a stake for every worker, that’s our model of development. In the next 5 years, the district is set to be among Maharashtra’s top 10 in terms of per capita income, and in the years ahead, is poised to lead from the front. MoS Adv Ashish Jaiswal, MLC Parinay Fuke, MLA Dr Milind Narote, MLA Dharamrao Baba Atram, Padma Shri Smt. Tulsi Munda, Managing Director Lloyds Metals and Energy, Shri B Prabhakaran and other dignitaries were present. Adv.Ashish jaiswal Dr. Parinay Fuke DR.MILIND RAMAJI NAROTE B. Prabhakaran #Maharashtra #Development #Gadchiroli
1:13

Gadchiroli's Growth: Forged In Steel Inaugurated and laid the foundation stone for various development projects of Lloyds Metals and Energy ltd. at Gadchiroli today, marking a significant step forward in the district’s journey of transformation. The dream of making Gadchiroli a steel hub is no longer just a vision, it’s now taking shape on the ground. Through green steel production, Gadchiroli is set to create steel that’s not only of higher quality than China’s, but also more affordable. Back in 2015–16, when mining first began here, the challenges were immense, Maoist threats and broken infrastructure. Yet, we stood firm. And today, the result is in front of us. Over 14,000 local youth are working with Lloyds, many of them women who started in housekeeping and now drive Volvo trucks, earning ₹55,000 a month. This is the true face of empowerment. With the integrated steel plant, 20,000 new job opportunities are on the way. And to prepare our youth for them, college has already been started under Gondwana University. A joint program with Curtin University in Australia is also active. Our focus is clear; progress, but with sustainability. An 80-km slurry pipeline, the first in Maharashtra and fourth in the country, has been set up to control pollution. Public transport is already gas-based and is transitioning to full electrification. The mission to plant 1 crore trees over the next 2 years has also taken off, with 40 lakh saplings being planted this year. This isn’t just about industry. Schools, hospitals, housing, and a stake for every worker, that’s our model of development. In the next 5 years, the district is set to be among Maharashtra’s top 10 in terms of per capita income, and in the years ahead, is poised to lead from the front. MoS Adv Ashish Jaiswal, MLC Parinay Fuke, MLA Dr Milind Narote, MLA Dharamrao Baba Atram, Padma Shri Smt. Tulsi Munda, Managing Director Lloyds Metals and Energy, Shri B Prabhakaran and other dignitaries were present. Adv.Ashish jaiswal Dr. Parinay Fuke DR.MILIND RAMAJI NAROTE B. Prabhakaran #Maharashtra #Development #Gadchiroli

Devendra Fadnavis

108,428 次观看 • 1 年前