Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

7-YEAR-OLD RASPBERRY PI WITH 2GB OF RAM IS RUNNING DEEPSEEK RIGHT NOW WHILE SAM ALTMAN BILLS $200/MO AND DARIO AMODEI BILLS $200/MO FOR A MODEL YOU NEVER GET TO KEEP 00:34 he points at the smallest board on the bench and says "out of all these I'm genuinely shocked...

10,442 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

7 Kommentare

Profilbild von twinedon
twinedonvor 11 Tagen

2GB and it still runs DeepSeek, wild

Profilbild von 724
724vor 11 Tagen

A 1.5b on a Pi is a fun stunt but you are right that it is a structure model, not an answers model. The real jump is 8b class on a used GPU, that is where local actually replaces a subscription.

Profilbild von Kata Seiko
Kata Seikovor 10 Tagen

Where can you get a system that will run on a Raspberry Pi, that will ask two systems (maybe Ollama with Qwen on one system and something else on the Mac) and then have that third system compare the answers, resolve inconsistencies and return the final answer to me?

Profilbild von rewind
rewindvor 11 Tagen

2gb is wild

Profilbild von Marin 😘
Marin 😘vor 11 Tagen

has he considered actually getting a job? this is unemployed content

Profilbild von Chajkovska
Chajkovskavor 10 Tagen

This is the part of the AI race nobody talks about enough. When powerful models run locally on 7-year-old hardware, AI stops being a subscription and starts becoming infrastructure anyone can own.

Profilbild von Pixel Eye Pictures (P.E.P) 🇨🇦
Pixel Eye Pictures (P.E.P) 🇨🇦vor 11 Tagen

Running “AI” lol super legit

Ähnliche Videos

UC Berkeley just open-sourced FreeToken. (2–4x faster local LLM inference than Ollama) the results are wild: - Qwen3.6-35B on an 8GB GPU at 39.3 tokens/s - DeepSeek-V4-Flash 284B on a 32GB GPU at 22 tokens/s - GLM-5.2 753B on a 96GB GPU at 14.9 tokens/s a 35B model at 16-bit precision needs about 70GB just for its weights. even at 4 bits it is close to 18GB, and FreeToken serves it on an 8GB GPU. let me explain how: all three models mentioned above are Mixture-of-Experts, and that is what FreeToken takes advantage of. each layer holds hundreds of separate experts plus a small router that picks a few of them per token. Qwen3.6-35B activates roughly 3B of its 35B parameters per token. DeepSeek-V4-Flash picks 6 of 256 experts per layer, so 13B of its 284B run at a time. so compute was never the bottleneck. the weights a single step touches fit comfortably on a consumer GPU. every expert the router might pick still has to exist somewhere. they sit in system RAM, and the GPU keeps a cache of the ones the model has been using recently. so everything comes down to what happens when the router picks an expert that is not on the GPU. there are two ways to serve that miss: 1. copy it over PCIe and run it on the GPU 2. run it on the CPU, where it already lives both read from the same system memory, so they compete for one pool of bandwidth instead of adding to each other. existing engines pick one option and freeze it when the model loads. but routing changes on every token, so a fixed choice misses most of what the model asks for. FreeToken measures both bandwidths on your machine and splits each step's misses between the two paths in proportion. the GPU and CPU results then merge exactly, with no approximation. two machines with the same GPU can end up wanting opposite strategies, which I did not expect. a 5090 in a gaming desktop should push nearly everything over PCIe, while an 8GB laptop is better off computing most misses on the CPU. none of that is readable off a spec sheet, so the engine profiles it once per machine. the second half of the design is about agents. coding agents constantly rewrite their own history, and every edit normally forces thousands of tokens back through prefill. FreeToken saves its checkpoints at the exact boundaries agent frameworks cut on, so it only reprocesses the new part. its slowest first token stays under 44 seconds, while llama.cpp peaks at 232 and KTransformers at 946. it serves the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs under Apache 2.0, so Claude Code and Codex can point at it directly. releasing weights publicly decides who can download a model, not who can afford to run one. frontier open models keep shipping, and running them still assumes a rented cluster. meanwhile there are over a hundred million consumer machines with discrete GPUs sitting mostly idle. closing that gap was never a hardware problem, and work like this is what turns open weights into something you can actually use. paper: repo: almost every idea in this post, from why memory bandwidth decides the outcome to why moving weights costs more than computing on them, comes straight out of how a GPU is built. I wrote a detailed primer on that. the article is quoted below.

Akshay 🚀

341,499 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen