Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

8⃣ The Hutchison Effect proves this isn't theoretical. Using Tesla coils + crystals, John Hutchison achieved: ✅Levitation of 70-pound objects ✅Metal jellification ✅Crystal batteries producing continuous power for MONTHS The Pentagon classified his research. Wonder why?

12,915 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🎙️ EXCLUSIVE INSIGHTS FROM A 30-YEAR BULLION BANK TRADER Bob Gottlieb, former precious metals trader at JP Morgan, HSBC and Citibank, explains his view of what is currently happening in the gold and silver market. TODAY'S RALLY IS NOTHING LIKE 1980 OR 2011 ✅ This isn't a Reddit-driven squeeze or a social media pump. ✅ This is a fundamental, policy-driven surge led by CENTRAL BANKS. ✅ "Central banks have decided they're going to buy and they're not going to stop buying because it's $4,600." CENTRAL BANKS DON'T CARE ABOUT PRICE – THEY CARE ABOUT POLICY ✅ Their buying is strategic, not speculative. ✅ Gold is now the #2 reserve asset for many central banks, ahead of the Euro. ✅ 75% of central banks surveyed plan to keep buying over the next 5 years. SILVER'S PERFECT STORM: DEFICITS & INDUSTRIAL DEMAND ✅ 5+ years of structural supply deficits. ✅ Soaring demand from solar, AI, EVs, and chips. ✅ New mines take 10-20 years to come online. ✅ "This is an equation for the silver price to go up." "THE BIGGEST MYTH: BANKS ARE SHORT THE WORLD'S SILVER" ❌ "This is false misinformation" because ✅ Banks are typically LONG physical and SHORT futures as part of a complex arbitrage. ✅ This structure allows them to profit from spreads, not bet against the metal. THE BOTTOM LINE This rally is built on rock-solid fundamentals: relentless central bank buying, structural silver deficits, and geopolitical fear. Gottlieb's statement that banks are never net short may remain open to question, as may his reluctance to explain price manipulation through the derivatives structure of precious metals trading. HT: Paul Buitink 🎙 YouTube: Reinvent Money #Gold #Silver #PreciousMetals #CentralBanks #Investing #Markets #Finance #ETF #Bullion #Trading

Mark

94,576 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

MAJOR RED ALERT: What's sitting in your garage, charging in your bedroom, or parked in your driveway could be a ticking time bomb. You missed the story the corporate media barely covered: Matson, a US shipping giant, just BANNED all electric vehicle shipments after 3 consecutive ship fires. Their reason? The "hazards of lithium-ion batteries." Why should you care? You're not shipping 3,000 cars across the ocean. Because the same technology in those EVs is in YOUR home right now: → Your phone → Your laptop → Your e-bike/scooter → Your Tesla → Your lawn equipment → Your toothbrush → Your kid's toys The stats are terrifying & they're being ignored: 🚨 NYC: Lithium battery fires increased 7X. 🚨 SF: Battery fires more than doubled. 🚨 Nationally: 40+ deaths from e-scooter/bike fires since 2017. 🚨 FAA: 60+ onboard battery incidents this year alone. These fires aren't like normal fires. They're chemical infernos. Once they start, they are often UNSTOPPABLE. Fire departments are often told to just "let them burn." The cause? A single point of failure: ✅ Overcharging ✅ Overheating (leaving an e-bike in the sun) ✅ Physical damage (a simple drop) ✅ Manufacturing defect ✅ Water exposure (flooded EVs burn houses down) This is a direct threat to your family and your home. YOUR ACTION PLAN NOW: 1. STOP overcharging devices. Unplug them once charged. 2. NEVER leave devices (especially e-bikes) charging unattended or overnight. 3. KEEP them out of direct sunlight and away from heat sources. 4. INSPECT batteries regularly for damage, swelling, or punctures. 5. CONSIDER a fire-proof containment bag for larger batteries (e-bikes, scooters). This isn't fear-mongering. It's a public safety emergency happening in silence. The government isn't acting. The media isn't warning you. Your safety is your responsibility. SHARE this to warn everyone you know.

Camus

74,738 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 DR. WILLIAM MAKIS MD CALLS THIS THE MOST IMPORTANT IVERMECTIN CANCER GRAPH HE'S EVER CREATED After reviewing hundreds of studies, case reports, and patient outcomes, Dr. William Makis MD says one question keeps coming up: ❓"What dose of Ivermectin are people actually using in cancer protocols?" His answer is surprisingly simple. 💊 For most cancers, his suggested starting point is: 1 mg/kg of Ivermectin per day 📊 THE FOUR IVERMECTIN DOSING LEVELS DR. MAKIS DISCUSSES MOST OFTEN 🔹 0.2 mg/kg daily Lower-dose protocols discussed in some case reports and published reports. 🔹 1.0 mg/kg daily Dr. Makis' typical starting point for most cancers. 🔹 2.0 mg/kg daily Discussed for highly aggressive cancers, including some brain cancers. 🔹 2.5 mg/kg daily The highest dosing level discussed in certain case reports. According to Dr. Makis, some of the most widely discussed case reports involve higher dosing strategies. And that's where the conversation gets interesting. Because this isn't being discussed for just one type of cancer. Researchers have investigated Ivermectin in: ✅ Breast Cancer ✅ Colon Cancer ✅ Lung Cancer ✅ Pancreatic Cancer ✅ Kidney Cancer ✅ Gastric Cancer ✅ Prostate Cancer ✅ Brain Cancer ✅ Leukemia And many others. Dr. Makis frequently points to reports involving significant changes in tumor markers, imaging results, and patient outcomes that continue driving interest in repurposed medicines. He also highlights something many people overlook: ✅ Off patent ✅ Generic ✅ Low cost ✅ Studied for decades Yet despite the growing number of publications and case reports, mainstream oncology rarely discusses it. That's why the debate keeps growing. Not because everyone agrees. Because patients keep sharing stories. Doctors keep debating. Researchers keep publishing. And people keep asking questions. Because if the answer were obvious... The conversation would've ended years ago. Instead, it's getting bigger. 📌 Save this chart. You'll want it later. 🔄 Repost so others can review the information for themselves. 💬 Have you been following Dr. William Makis MD's work on Ivermectin and cancer? 💊 Researching Ivermectin? Explore RXMEDS.STORE. #Ivermectin #CancerResearch #MakisMD #RepurposedDrugs

RXMEDS.STORE

48,417 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

We’ve gone critical. At 12:20 am on July 4th, Aalo sustained a controlled fission chain reaction for the first time. We have officially surpassed the goal of President Trump’s Executive Order 14301, achieving 4 advanced nuclear reactor criticalities by America’s 250th birthday. This is a zero-power criticality to validate our supply chain, reactor physics and control systems for our 10 MWe full-powered reactor, the Aalo-X, targeting power operations next year. Everything was built at full scale: fuel, moderator, control systems, etc., so we understand system performance at its commercial scope. That also meant tackling four of the most difficult things in nuclear with this criticality milestone: ✅ Ground-up construction of our reactor facility ✅ Manufacturing the reactor in our factory and shipping them by road ✅ Assembling our own fuel assemblies using commercial UO2 ✅ Standing up training, safety, and operational programs to become our own nuclear operator I am proud to say we have accomplished all four goals, along with achieving criticality. The reactor building was constructed in 36 days and construction to criticality was achieved in under 8 months. That’s the fastest nuclear build in the last 80 years. A massive congratulations to the Aalo Atomics team and our partners. Many thanks to Idaho National Laboratory, the DOE-Idaho Operations Office, and the Office of Nuclear Energy for their immense support in enabling this milestone and dedicated to the American nuclear resurgence.

Yasir Arafat

98,304 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

A team tested Pi0, Pi0 Fast, Gr00t, and ACT on real robot arms in manufacturing tasks. (🔖 Bookmark this for later!) The task was precise: place thin rectangular frames from a messy stack into a holder. The team fine-tuned each model on 100 real trajectories and compared training time, inference speed, motion quality, and success rates. ⬇️ Here’s a breakdown of what they found Pi0 (Original) ✅ Strongest overall performance in precise pick-and-place ✅ High success rate even in edge cases ✅ Longest training time (~11 hours, ~$30 per run) ✅ Inference time of 80 ms causes short pauses between actions Despite delays, it handles complex scenarios well… solid for high-precision tasks, but slow to train. Gr00t ✅ Trains fast (~2 hours, ~$5 per run) ✅ Performs almost as well as Pi0 on large-object tasks ✅ Struggles with fine precision; random movement in some trials ✅ More training didn’t fix jitter or random offsets Best suited for tasks where exact precision isn’t critical. Not ready for manufacturing-grade accuracy without more tuning. Pi0 Fast ✅ Promised faster training, but results were underwhelming ✅ Training at 6 hours still showed low success rates ✅ Inference was slower than expected ✅ Not reliable for generalizing even slightly new tasks Currently too unstable for real-world deployment. Doesn’t live up to the “Fast” name yet. ACT (Baseline) ✅ 200MB model—lightweight, but limited ✅ Struggles with stacked objects or ambiguous scenes ✅ Success rates around 70% in best-case setups ✅ Can’t match newer models on precision or generalization Still a solid baseline, but clearly a generation behind in robustness. 🚨 Extra Notes All newer models share a common issue: •Inference takes longer than a frame (80 ms vs 33 ms), so robots “pause” between chunks. •This results in jittery movements, but not a dealbreaker unless tasks are time-sensitive. Language-conditioned tasks also fell short: after training on two labeled tasks, the model couldn’t generalize to a third unseen combination using only text prompts. ✅ The good news? These models adapt well to new robot arms with quick fine-tuning. ❌ The bad news? There’s still no plug-and-play solution for improving performance after deployment. Reinforcement learning or DAgger-style data collection during real-world operation may be the next big step, something many teams in robotics are actively working on.

Ilir Aliu

21,844 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚀 Introducing AIIA Finance Whitelist & Virtual AIIA-USDC Program: Don't Miss Out on the Free Profit for Smart Investors! 🚀 🌟 Why You Need to Join the AIIA Finance Whitelist NOW: ✅Exclusive Opportunities: Complete social tasks, refer friends, and make early contributions to create a ripple effect. ✅Elite Community: Be part of a quality user base with genuine interactions and transparent transactions. ✅Free $300 Rewards: Earn a reward of 300 AIIA-USDC (the virtual money that is converted 1:1 with the USDC when opening positions in the AIIA Finance platform) ✅Risk-Free Profits: The "deposited virtual money – real profit" program with the AIIA-USDC ensures that you will earn real returns with zero risk. 💼 Virtual Investment Positions: ✅Trading Transparency: Real-time PnL Index updates every 4 hours. Profit will be calculated from this PnL Index. ✅Virtual input, Real output: Using rewarded AIIA-USDC to open positions in the AIIA Finance Platform. When closed, the profit recognized can be withdrawn. ✅Absolute Safety: Your real capital is always protected during the process, and only virtual money is involved. 🔍 Virtual Money AIIA-USDC Experience: ✅Risk-Free Trading: Use virtual tokens to experience our platform, open investment positions, and earn profit without risking your capital. ⏳ Don't Wait – Start Your Smart Investment Journey Today! ⏳ Join the revolution with AIIA Finance and secure your financial future! Testnet will be Released SOON! #AIIAFinance #AIIAUSDC #Whitelist #VirtualAIIA

AIIA DeFi

25,189 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$IREN BELOW $100 is STEAL !!! ✅ Chamath recently said that building 1 GW of AI data center capacity today can cost around $100 billion. Whether the number ends up being $80B, $100B, or somewhere in between isn’t the main takeaway. The takeaway is this: Power-ready AI infrastructure has become one of the most valuable assets on the planet. Now look at what IREN already controls: Sweetwater, Texas — 2.0 GW Childress, Texas — 750 MW Oklahoma — 1.6 GW South Australia — 800 MW Spain (Nostrum) — 490 MW Prince George, Mackenzie & Canal Flats — Existing AI cloud infrastructure Total portfolio: 5.8 GW of secured power capacity. What excites me most is what should be energized by 2026: ⚡ Sweetwater Phase 1 (~1.4 GW) ⚡ Childress (750 MW) ⚡ Prince George & Mackenzie continuing to scale AI cloud operations That’s already ~2.1+ GW of energized AI infrastructure either operating or coming online. Using Chamath’s framework: 2 GW = ~$200 billion of replacement value Yet IREN trades around a $18-20 billion market cap Even if Chamath is off by 50%, you’re still looking at a valuation gap that is hard to ignore. The market is pricing IREN like a miner. The bull case is that it’s becoming a large-scale AI infrastructure platform. By math alone, if ~2 GW is energized and available for AI workloads by 2026, a $100B+ market cap doesn’t seem crazy. That would imply a stock price potentially in the $150-$250 range, based solely on the value of the energized AI infrastructure—not even giving full credit to the remaining 3.7+ GW in the portfolio. 🤯🤯🤯 This is why I believe the market is dramatically underestimating what IREN is building. ✅ Gigawatts of power ✅ Strategic land positions ✅ Grid access ✅ Permits & approvals ✅ AI-ready infrastructure

investing

78,823 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Today, we laid the physics foundation for our ARC fusion power plant. ⚛️ With 5 deeply researched papers — validated by independent peer review and published in the Journal of Plasma Physics — we’ve shown we've nailed the scientific basics of producing copious amounts of fusion power. The collective assessment from our 58 co-authors? This machine will work. No scientific breakthroughs are required to bring this clean, secure, abundant source of energy to the grid. Here is how we're handling fusion's biggest challenges: ⚡ Powering the Grid: Using extremely strong magnets, ARC will confine the plasma long enough to generate 1.1 GW of fusion power. We'll convert that into 400 MW of continuous net electricity — enough to power ~280,000 average American homes. 🛡️ Handling Heat Exhaust: To control a superhot, unruly cloud of charged particles, we're utilizing proven methods to safely handle the heat exhaust that acts as a key practical constraint for tokamaks. ✅ Managing Disruptions: We aren't trying to build an operationally perfect machine. We are pragmatically designing ARC to safely handle disruptions and keep the plasma stable for top performance. 🏗️ Proving the Approach: We're building on decades of tokamak research and supercomputer simulations. And we're proving our approach right now with SPARC, the tokamak we are actively building in Massachusetts. With our transparency, you don’t have to take our assertions on faith. We are really pushing fusion forward.

Commonwealth Fusion Systems

10,776 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 BREAKING: Karoline Leavitt GOES SCORCHED EARTH on CNN's Natasha Bertrand Over FAKE News Leak! 🚨 Karoline Leavitt just TORCHED Fake News CNN “reporter” Natasha Bertrand live on air, exposing her as a repeat mouthpiece for disinformation and confirming the FBI is now conducting a CRIMINAL investigation into the classified intel leak Bertrand ran with!🔥 Leavitt didn’t hold back: “Only tidbits of a low-confidence intel assessment were leaked—illegally—to CNN. And once again, it’s Natasha Bertrand, the same so-called journalist who has been used time and time again to smear President Trump with fake narratives.”🧢 Let’s recap Natasha Bertrand’s track record of deception: ✅ Lied about Hunter Biden’s laptop being “Russian disinfo” ✅ Lied that COVID couldn’t have come from a lab leak ✅ Pushed the debunked “suckers and losers” hoax ✅ Twisted Trump’s “fine people” remarks out of context ✅ Claimed (wrongly) that Iran wasn’t trying to sabotage Trump’s campaign—turns out they were, and even tried to take his life💥 Leavitt calls her out as a pawn of the intelligence community, weaponized against Trump and the truth itself: “This isn’t journalism. This is narrative laundering.”📢 The FBI wants answers. So should we. WHO leaked this intel—and why is it always to the same reporter pushing the same anti-Trump lies?🔥 Watch Leavitt’s full takedown and share this far and wide. The American people deserve accountability.

Project Constitution

29,319 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr