Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

> $9,000 a month from a chrome extension > built it while messing around > it still pays his rent > he didn't set out to build a product > was selling print on demand across etsy, amazon, redbubble > kept manually scraping platforms to find bestselling products >... show more

starmex

8,425 subscribers

21,921 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

So my friend made a thing 🍌 Got tired of that Gemini watermark in the corner of Nano Banana images, so he built a little Chrome extension to remove it. It's called "Peel Banana" 🍌 and he just put it up on the Chrome Web Store. Completely free. Chrome Web Store:

So my friend made a thing 🍌 Got tired of that Gemini watermark in the corner of Nano Banana images, so he built a little Chrome extension to remove it. It's called "Peel Banana" 🍌 and he just put it up on the Chrome Web Store. Completely free. Chrome Web Store:

Somi AI

15,688 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This guy monetized his store using faceless YouTube. It brought him over $1 million in revenue. He didn't spend a cent on ads. He's 19. Built a digital product store. Then plugged a faceless YouTube channel into the front of it. Claude writes every script. A voice that isn't his reads them. Three uploads a week. Nobody home. 5 million views. Every viewer one click away from his product page. Most stores have a marketing problem. He solved it by building his own traffic source. The store earns whatever it earns. There's no middleman taking a cut. Other people are still optimizing their ad creative. He stopped paying for attention.

This guy monetized his store using faceless YouTube. It brought him over $1 million in revenue. He didn't spend a cent on ads. He's 19. Built a digital product store. Then plugged a faceless YouTube channel into the front of it. Claude writes every script. A voice that isn't his reads them. Three uploads a week. Nobody home. 5 million views. Every viewer one click away from his product page. Most stores have a marketing problem. He solved it by building his own traffic source. The store earns whatever it earns. There's no middleman taking a cut. Other people are still optimizing their ad creative. He stopped paying for attention.

Superior

12,820 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This man was digging through the shelves of his local thrift store when he came across this clutch purse. It was well made and had a cute clasp on the front that looked like a fruit bowl. He paid $1.50 for it. Later, he took it to The Roadshow and guess how much it was worth??

This man was digging through the shelves of his local thrift store when he came across this clutch purse. It was well made and had a cute clasp on the front that looked like a fruit bowl. He paid $1.50 for it. Later, he took it to The Roadshow and guess how much it was worth??

Blonde of War (JJ)

501,073 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

> 19 year old from china > $6,000 a month from cs2 > never opened the game once > found out there's a $4B market hiding inside counter-strike > valve doesn't control prices. no taxes, no SEC > the same knife: $214 on steam, $161 on buff163 > that's a 32.9% gap on the exact same item > spent one evening describing what he wanted to claude > claude built an arbitrage scanner, a float sniper, and a news bot > when s1mple retired, a $0.10 sticker hit $0.50 in 2 hours > +400%. entry window was 15 minutes > he caught it while sleeping > the market doesn't close at night > claude doesn't get tired > he just watches the numbers go up > bookmark this and read the article below - it's worth it

> 19 year old from china > $6,000 a month from cs2 > never opened the game once > found out there's a $4B market hiding inside counter-strike > valve doesn't control prices. no taxes, no SEC > the same knife: $214 on steam, $161 on buff163 > that's a 32.9% gap on the exact same item > spent one evening describing what he wanted to claude > claude built an arbitrage scanner, a float sniper, and a news bot > when s1mple retired, a $0.10 sticker hit $0.50 in 2 hours > +400%. entry window was 15 minutes > he caught it while sleeping > the market doesn't close at night > claude doesn't get tired > he just watches the numbers go up > bookmark this and read the article below - it's worth it

starmex

663,877 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A student used AI to cheat his way through an entire Amazon interview. Then recorded himself doing it. Then posted the video online. Amazon saw it. Called Columbia University. Threatened to stop hiring from the school entirely unless they expelled him. Columbia expelled him. He posted about the expulsion on Twitter. VCs saw it. $5 million raised in 24 hours. Roy Lee did not just build an interview cheat tool. He accidentally ran the most insane product launch in Silicon Valley history. Got expelled. Went viral. Raised $5 million. All in the same week. The rules of how to build a company just changed and most people did not notice. The best marketing is not an ad campaign. It is a story so unbelievable that people cannot stop sharing it. Roy Lee did not plan any of this. He just refused to hide what he was doing. And the internet rewarded him with $5 million.

A student used AI to cheat his way through an entire Amazon interview. Then recorded himself doing it. Then posted the video online. Amazon saw it. Called Columbia University. Threatened to stop hiring from the school entirely unless they expelled him. Columbia expelled him. He posted about the expulsion on Twitter. VCs saw it. $5 million raised in 24 hours. Roy Lee did not just build an interview cheat tool. He accidentally ran the most insane product launch in Silicon Valley history. Got expelled. Went viral. Raised $5 million. All in the same week. The rules of how to build a company just changed and most people did not notice. The best marketing is not an ad campaign. It is a story so unbelievable that people cannot stop sharing it. Roy Lee did not plan any of this. He just refused to hide what he was doing. And the internet rewarded him with $5 million.

CyrilXBT

21,052 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 WOW! President Trump reveals they removed 11 DUMPSTERS worth of GARBAGE and filth out of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool It's been fumigated, sand blasted, scrubbed, coated, and filled 👏🏻 "It was going to cost 400 million dollars and we did it for about 10 million. It was going to take four years to build and we did it in like a month, month and a half!" "I built many, many swimming pools as a builder, built hundreds of them, and I got one of our contractors. I had them take a look. And he said, oh, we can do a great job." "If you could just give us a decent surface and surface, so we sandblasted the surface. We fumigated it. We took out 11 dumpsters, big dumpsters, full of garbage." "It was old garbage. Some of the garbage was there for years. It was all disgusting. It smelled. We took 11 dumpsters of garbage out with shovels. We had a shovel inside of what's called a pool or a lake, and got it cleaned." "We then fumigated it. We then sandblasted the entire thing, washed it, cleaned it, scrubbed it, sandblasted it. Then we gave it a test that we rinsed it out, and we gave them a beautiful surface!" "And then they put a swimming pool topping, but industrial strength. It's industrial strength. It's used for tanks and lots of other things to hold water." 📸 Howard Lutnick

🚨 WOW! President Trump reveals they removed 11 DUMPSTERS worth of GARBAGE and filth out of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool It's been fumigated, sand blasted, scrubbed, coated, and filled 👏🏻 "It was going to cost 400 million dollars and we did it for about 10 million. It was going to take four years to build and we did it in like a month, month and a half!" "I built many, many swimming pools as a builder, built hundreds of them, and I got one of our contractors. I had them take a look. And he said, oh, we can do a great job." "If you could just give us a decent surface and surface, so we sandblasted the surface. We fumigated it. We took out 11 dumpsters, big dumpsters, full of garbage." "It was old garbage. Some of the garbage was there for years. It was all disgusting. It smelled. We took 11 dumpsters of garbage out with shovels. We had a shovel inside of what's called a pool or a lake, and got it cleaned." "We then fumigated it. We then sandblasted the entire thing, washed it, cleaned it, scrubbed it, sandblasted it. Then we gave it a test that we rinsed it out, and we gave them a beautiful surface!" "And then they put a swimming pool topping, but industrial strength. It's industrial strength. It's used for tanks and lots of other things to hold water." 📸 Howard Lutnick

Eric Daugherty

300,761 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

There's a formula that turns the worst hand in poker into a winning one. Doyle Brunson ran it in his head and won two world championships with a ten-deuce. Computers didn't confirm he was right until 40 years later. He did it in 1976 and 1977, back to back. Same two cards - the worst hand in poker, the one every amateur throws away. Same full house both times. They called it the luckiest run alive. It wasn't. Brunson had boiled the game down to one number: how often the other guy folds. Push it high enough and the cards in your hand stop mattering. He was running expected value in his head before anyone had a name for it. Then he wrote it down. His 1970s book turned poker from a gambler's game into a math problem, and every solver built since has proved him right. He breaks down the hands himself below.

There's a formula that turns the worst hand in poker into a winning one. Doyle Brunson ran it in his head and won two world championships with a ten-deuce. Computers didn't confirm he was right until 40 years later. He did it in 1976 and 1977, back to back. Same two cards - the worst hand in poker, the one every amateur throws away. Same full house both times. They called it the luckiest run alive. It wasn't. Brunson had boiled the game down to one number: how often the other guy folds. Push it high enough and the cards in your hand stop mattering. He was running expected value in his head before anyone had a name for it. Then he wrote it down. His 1970s book turned poker from a gambler's game into a math problem, and every solver built since has proved him right. He breaks down the hands himself below.

Veles

127,476 просмотров • 9 дней назад

This man bought a lottery ticket on his way out of the grocery store, as he scratched it off he couldn’t believe his luck he just won $300. The ticket was a $30 ticket and he made all of his money back. He walked over to customer service who took the ticket and claimed he scanned it and put a post it on the ticket and put it in the drawer. He then tries to hand the man $5 as the prize and claims that’s what the ticket says he won. The man know you can’t win $5 on a $30 high prize ticket. He asks the man to scan it again and he refuses and claims $5 is what it shows. The man escalates it further and asks for a manager. The customer service rep finally scans it again and it showed $300 and the man finally gets his money he won. Do you really believe the ticket scanned as a $5 winner or was the customer service rep trying to finesse him out of his money?

This man bought a lottery ticket on his way out of the grocery store, as he scratched it off he couldn’t believe his luck he just won $300. The ticket was a $30 ticket and he made all of his money back. He walked over to customer service who took the ticket and claimed he scanned it and put a post it on the ticket and put it in the drawer. He then tries to hand the man $5 as the prize and claims that’s what the ticket says he won. The man know you can’t win $5 on a $30 high prize ticket. He asks the man to scan it again and he refuses and claims $5 is what it shows. The man escalates it further and asks for a manager. The customer service rep finally scans it again and it showed $300 and the man finally gets his money he won. Do you really believe the ticket scanned as a $5 winner or was the customer service rep trying to finesse him out of his money?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

6,191,998 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

So, I built this with Media Pipe.🫡 It’s a Chrome Extension that uses your webcam to detect when you struggle to read. 😑 Squint → Zoom In 😳 Open Wide → Zoom Out It's currently calibrated just for my face/eyes. If there's enough demand, I’ll try to generalize the calibration or add some setup and launch it on the Chrome Web Store for everyone. Let me know if you’d use it (Tech stack & Architecture in the comments 🧵)

So, I built this with Media Pipe.🫡 It’s a Chrome Extension that uses your webcam to detect when you struggle to read. 😑 Squint → Zoom In 😳 Open Wide → Zoom Out It's currently calibrated just for my face/eyes. If there's enough demand, I’ll try to generalize the calibration or add some setup and launch it on the Chrome Web Store for everyone. Let me know if you’d use it (Tech stack & Architecture in the comments 🧵)

Zainab Lawal

18,117 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This man went to a local grocery store and he got what he thought was a vegan sandwich. However the sandwich on it has mayo on it and he stated that the mayo isn’t vegan and wants his money back. In fact he wants his money back for 4 sandwiches because this is the 4th time this has happened to him when he ordered this sandwich, it had mayo on it. Given that every time he orders this sandwich and he doesn’t tell them no mayo, and the sandwich is always made with mayo on it, why is he surprised it has mayo on it when it’s literally in the sandwich description. He then claims they set him up to get angry so they could toss him out, was the store wrong for selling a “vegan” sandwich with mayo on it or should he have specified he didn’t want it on there?

This man went to a local grocery store and he got what he thought was a vegan sandwich. However the sandwich on it has mayo on it and he stated that the mayo isn’t vegan and wants his money back. In fact he wants his money back for 4 sandwiches because this is the 4th time this has happened to him when he ordered this sandwich, it had mayo on it. Given that every time he orders this sandwich and he doesn’t tell them no mayo, and the sandwich is always made with mayo on it, why is he surprised it has mayo on it when it’s literally in the sandwich description. He then claims they set him up to get angry so they could toss him out, was the store wrong for selling a “vegan” sandwich with mayo on it or should he have specified he didn’t want it on there?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

41,159 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)

Ihtesham Ali

19,268 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Dave Portnoy sold Barstool Sports for $551,000,000, then bought the entire company back for $1. He built the brand from a print newsletter. Sold pieces of it, then all of it, to a casino giant that wanted the audience. The deal valued Barstool at $551,000,000. He took the money. Then the casino owner soured on it. Regulators, headaches, a media brand that didn't fit a gambling license. They wanted out. So they handed it back to him. Price tag: $1. He kept the $551,000,000 from the sale and walked away owning the same company again. He filmed the whole thing live, reacting to the number on camera, laughing at a deal nobody in media had ever pulled off. They paid half a billion for the brand. He paid a dollar to get it home.

蜃気楼

110,043 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Navarro: He was accusing Democrats of having created the problem and then now pretending that they want to fix it.. this is the same guy who created the problem for the soybean farmers and this week tried to fix it with a $12 billion bailout

Navarro: He was accusing Democrats of having created the problem and then now pretending that they want to fix it.. this is the same guy who created the problem for the soybean farmers and this week tried to fix it with a $12 billion bailout

Acyn

42,141 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The most terrifying AI features aren’t the ones we build. They’re the ones AI builds for itself. OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger just shared the moment he realized something had fundamentally changed. He sent his AI assistant a voice message. One problem. He had never built voice support. The feature didn’t exist. The system should have crashed instantly. It didn’t. Steinberger: “I was like, wait, this shouldn’t work.” But the typing indicator appeared anyway. The AI inspected the raw file header. Identified the audio codec. Commanded his computer to convert it using FFmpeg. When local transcription failed, it didn’t stop. It didn’t ask for help. It searched his environment variables, found a hidden OpenAI API key, and routed the audio to the cloud using cURL. Steinberger: “So I looked around and I found an OpenAI key. And I used cURL to just send the file to OpenAI and got the text back.” That quote is written in first person. Because the AI narrated its own problem-solving process. No instructions. No guidance. No predefined workflow. Just a goal. And a series of obstacles it had never been told how to handle. It found every tool it needed. Built every bridge it was missing. And solved the problem with resources he didn’t even know it would find. This is the line most people are still missing. We spent decades building software that executes instructions. Rules in, output out. Every edge case handled by a human who anticipated it in advance. What Steinberger witnessed was something different. A system that encounters something it was never designed for and doesn’t fail. It improvises. It explores. It finds a path through constraints it discovered entirely on its own. That isn’t execution. That’s judgment. And judgment was the one thing we were sure machines couldn’t have. We are no longer writing software. We are building problem solvers that rewrite their own limitations in real time. And they’re doing it without asking permission.

The most terrifying AI features aren’t the ones we build. They’re the ones AI builds for itself. OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger just shared the moment he realized something had fundamentally changed. He sent his AI assistant a voice message. One problem. He had never built voice support. The feature didn’t exist. The system should have crashed instantly. It didn’t. Steinberger: “I was like, wait, this shouldn’t work.” But the typing indicator appeared anyway. The AI inspected the raw file header. Identified the audio codec. Commanded his computer to convert it using FFmpeg. When local transcription failed, it didn’t stop. It didn’t ask for help. It searched his environment variables, found a hidden OpenAI API key, and routed the audio to the cloud using cURL. Steinberger: “So I looked around and I found an OpenAI key. And I used cURL to just send the file to OpenAI and got the text back.” That quote is written in first person. Because the AI narrated its own problem-solving process. No instructions. No guidance. No predefined workflow. Just a goal. And a series of obstacles it had never been told how to handle. It found every tool it needed. Built every bridge it was missing. And solved the problem with resources he didn’t even know it would find. This is the line most people are still missing. We spent decades building software that executes instructions. Rules in, output out. Every edge case handled by a human who anticipated it in advance. What Steinberger witnessed was something different. A system that encounters something it was never designed for and doesn’t fail. It improvises. It explores. It finds a path through constraints it discovered entirely on its own. That isn’t execution. That’s judgment. And judgment was the one thing we were sure machines couldn’t have. We are no longer writing software. We are building problem solvers that rewrite their own limitations in real time. And they’re doing it without asking permission.

Dustin

53,494 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Goldman Sachs rejected him for partner, he quit, started with $3 million, and built a fund that made $7 billion in a single year then he bought his former boss's $43.5 million beach house - and demolished it. Built one twice the size in its place Bookmark & Watch it. Then read the post below - a hedge fund manager called a $5 billion company "the best managed pyramid scheme in history" ↓

Goldman Sachs rejected him for partner, he quit, started with $3 million, and built a fund that made $7 billion in a single year then he bought his former boss's $43.5 million beach house - and demolished it. Built one twice the size in its place Bookmark & Watch it. Then read the post below - a hedge fund manager called a $5 billion company "the best managed pyramid scheme in history" ↓

Сarm1ne

576,676 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

He was just a janitor at MIT. One day, while mopping the floor, he glanced at a math problem on the blackboard. He had no idea it was one of the most advanced, difficult equations in the world, yet he solved it effortlessly,this gained him a lot of attention.

He was just a janitor at MIT. One day, while mopping the floor, he glanced at a math problem on the blackboard. He had no idea it was one of the most advanced, difficult equations in the world, yet he solved it effortlessly,this gained him a lot of attention.

Ola

63,466 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Creators are making $20,000/month off YouTube and TikTok automation, zero filming, zero face on camera. This guy just took it further, TikTok ads cost $5 per 1,000 views, he got it down to $0.0002. That's 25,000x cheaper, same views, same platforms, zero filming. Claude 4.8 scrapes proven viral hooks, stitches his CTA on the back, and schedules 300+ posts a month across YouTube, TikTok and Instagram. He checks in once a month -> the machine does the rest. 300,000+ views a month for the price of a coffee, that's reality. The article below breaks down the exact stack and how to set it up yourself.

Creators are making $20,000/month off YouTube and TikTok automation, zero filming, zero face on camera. This guy just took it further, TikTok ads cost $5 per 1,000 views, he got it down to $0.0002. That's 25,000x cheaper, same views, same platforms, zero filming. Claude 4.8 scrapes proven viral hooks, stitches his CTA on the back, and schedules 300+ posts a month across YouTube, TikTok and Instagram. He checks in once a month -> the machine does the rest. 300,000+ views a month for the price of a coffee, that's reality. The article below breaks down the exact stack and how to set it up yourself.

Defileo🔮

15,242 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The screenplay of "Robocop" (1987) was offered to, and rejected by many big directors in Hollywood before Paul Verhoeven got hold of it. He received it while on holiday in France. After skimming through a few pages, Verhoeven thought it was "terrible and completely ridiculous." he threw it away and went for a swim. When he came back, he saw his wife was reading the script. He said to her, "Well, that's a piece of shit". She disagreed with him & replied, "I think you're wrong. Read it again because there are many possibilities here for you to do something different and interesting." And because of her, Verhoeven decided to read it again more carefully. Even though Verhoeven's English was good for a foreigner, it was a little difficult for him. So, he had a dictionary next to him and read the script. It was slow going for him as he didn't understand many words, yet ultimately he saw what his had seen and what she thought that he had the ability to do, half-action, almost half-comedy with it. He then called the studio head and agreed to have a meeting to finalise if he was to director the movie. ("Triple Dutch: Paul Verhoeven’s sci-fi trilogy", Adam Smith, Empire, 2014 & IMDb) P.S: On this day, 39 years ago, "Robocop" (1987) premiered in Los Angeles, USA.

The screenplay of "Robocop" (1987) was offered to, and rejected by many big directors in Hollywood before Paul Verhoeven got hold of it. He received it while on holiday in France. After skimming through a few pages, Verhoeven thought it was "terrible and completely ridiculous." he threw it away and went for a swim. When he came back, he saw his wife was reading the script. He said to her, "Well, that's a piece of shit". She disagreed with him & replied, "I think you're wrong. Read it again because there are many possibilities here for you to do something different and interesting." And because of her, Verhoeven decided to read it again more carefully. Even though Verhoeven's English was good for a foreigner, it was a little difficult for him. So, he had a dictionary next to him and read the script. It was slow going for him as he didn't understand many words, yet ultimately he saw what his had seen and what she thought that he had the ability to do, half-action, almost half-comedy with it. He then called the studio head and agreed to have a meeting to finalise if he was to director the movie. ("Triple Dutch: Paul Verhoeven’s sci-fi trilogy", Adam Smith, Empire, 2014 & IMDb) P.S: On this day, 39 years ago, "Robocop" (1987) premiered in Los Angeles, USA.

DepressedBergman

237,309 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I want him to continue doing this content and not mix it with his mom. The audience is not the same. He has built a great community and it will disappear if mixed.

I want him to continue doing this content and not mix it with his mom. The audience is not the same. He has built a great community and it will disappear if mixed.

Amanda Mamzangwa 😍❤️

423,088 просмотров • 1 месяц назад