Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

A student used AI to cheat his way through an entire Amazon interview. Then recorded himself doing it. Then posted the video online. Amazon saw it. Called Columbia University. Threatened to stop hiring from the school entirely unless they expelled him. Columbia expelled him. He posted about the expulsion...

cyrilXBT's profile picture

CyrilXBT

191,666 subscribers

21,052 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

How a College Sophomore Hacked an Amazon Interview 🔥 @jason and alex 🏴‍☠️🇺🇸🇺🇦 sit down with Roy Lee Roy, the student who used AI to hack Amazon’s hiring process, got an offer… then exposed it all on YouTube. Now, he’s facing disciplinary action—but also building a $1M startup from the fallout. 🔹 The death of LeetCode? Roy’s tool shows how AI can game coding interviews, forcing companies to rethink their hiring. 🔹 Columbia vs. Roy – After Amazon execs saw his video, they snitched to his university. 🔹 Amazon’s interview system—broken? Are coding tests really testing skill, or just memorization? 🔹 From scandal to startup – Roy’s AI-powered interview hack is now a business. Did Roy expose a broken hiring system and change the game forever? 🤯
7:09

How a College Sophomore Hacked an Amazon Interview 🔥 @jason and alex 🏴‍☠️🇺🇸🇺🇦 sit down with Roy Lee Roy, the student who used AI to hack Amazon’s hiring process, got an offer… then exposed it all on YouTube. Now, he’s facing disciplinary action—but also building a $1M startup from the fallout. 🔹 The death of LeetCode? Roy’s tool shows how AI can game coding interviews, forcing companies to rethink their hiring. 🔹 Columbia vs. Roy – After Amazon execs saw his video, they snitched to his university. 🔹 Amazon’s interview system—broken? Are coding tests really testing skill, or just memorization? 🔹 From scandal to startup – Roy’s AI-powered interview hack is now a business. Did Roy expose a broken hiring system and change the game forever? 🤯

This Week in Startups

236,500 просмотров • 1 год назад

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?
0:23

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?

Marlow

513,913 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

He made €25 MILLION… then lost it all and went to MINUS €7 million. 💸 Look - this is one of the most jaw-dropping stories we’ve ever had in the studio. Aldis Ozols was a multimillionaire in Latvia. Real estate. Rolls-Royce Phantom. The only yellow Hummer in the entire country. People took pictures next to his car. Then 2008 hit. The music stopped. He didn’t just lose the money - he went €7 MILLION into the negative. Depression. Walking barefoot. Almost ended it all. So what did he do? He came to Ghana. 🇬🇭
1:35

He made €25 MILLION… then lost it all and went to MINUS €7 million. 💸 Look - this is one of the most jaw-dropping stories we’ve ever had in the studio. Aldis Ozols was a multimillionaire in Latvia. Real estate. Rolls-Royce Phantom. The only yellow Hummer in the entire country. People took pictures next to his car. Then 2008 hit. The music stopped. He didn’t just lose the money - he went €7 MILLION into the negative. Depression. Walking barefoot. Almost ended it all. So what did he do? He came to Ghana. 🇬🇭

Derrick Abaitey

41,927 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

CNN interviewed Jonathan Epstein, an eye witness of the DC shooting that killed 2 Israeli Embassy employees and it did not go their way. "What I saw in his eyes? I mean, I went to Columbia for Grad School, and I saw the same thing in his eyes as I saw in the eyes of all the protesters at Columbia, nothing different between him and them." "They gave permission, they gave the permission, and they've called for this. They have called for intifada revolution, which is the same thing he yelled last night."
2:11

CNN interviewed Jonathan Epstein, an eye witness of the DC shooting that killed 2 Israeli Embassy employees and it did not go their way. "What I saw in his eyes? I mean, I went to Columbia for Grad School, and I saw the same thing in his eyes as I saw in the eyes of all the protesters at Columbia, nothing different between him and them." "They gave permission, they gave the permission, and they've called for this. They have called for intifada revolution, which is the same thing he yelled last night."

Thomas Hern

163,222 просмотров • 1 год назад

A PhD student built a working nuclear fusion reactor in his garage, let an AI run it, and 400 thousand dollars later he works for Elon Musk. he posted it once. that single post ended with a grant in his account and a job offer from the most powerful man on earth. not a simulation. not a school project. an actual device that fuses atoms, sitting where his car used to be. fusion is the thing governments have been chasing for 70 years with billion dollar labs. the hard part was never the reactor itself. it was the control. the plasma inside has to be held at conditions hotter than the core of the sun, and it shifts and collapses in milliseconds. no human can react fast enough to keep it stable. so he stopped trying to do it himself. he handed the control loop to an AI. the model reads the sensor data hundreds of times a second, predicts how the plasma is about to move, and adjusts the magnetic fields before it ever drifts out of line. it does not wait for the plasma to misbehave. it sees it coming and corrects it before it happens. the same reaction-before-the-event speed no person could ever match. this is the exact kind of build people are tearing apart inside Neuro Club. not to make reactors, but because the workflow is identical for anything hard. let the AI run the loop, predict the problem, fix it before it breaks. same playbook whether it is plasma or a business. then the post went out. within days Elon's fusion team reached out. they did not ask him to interview for an entry role. they handed him a 400 thousand dollar grant and pulled him onto the team building this at scale. one garage build turned a PhD student into an operator for the most ambitious man alive. here is the part that should stop you. he was one guy with a PhD, a garage, and an AI model doing the job that entire teams of physicists used to fail at. the AI was not assisting him. it was the operator. he built the hardware. the machine ran it. and that was enough to get noticed at the very top. most people think AI writes emails and makes pictures. meanwhile someone pointed it at one of the hardest physics problems on earth, held the plasma steady, and got paid by Elon Musk for it. the gap is not between humans and AI anymore. it is between the people who realize what this thing can already do and the people still using it to summarize their inbox.
1:31

A PhD student built a working nuclear fusion reactor in his garage, let an AI run it, and 400 thousand dollars later he works for Elon Musk. he posted it once. that single post ended with a grant in his account and a job offer from the most powerful man on earth. not a simulation. not a school project. an actual device that fuses atoms, sitting where his car used to be. fusion is the thing governments have been chasing for 70 years with billion dollar labs. the hard part was never the reactor itself. it was the control. the plasma inside has to be held at conditions hotter than the core of the sun, and it shifts and collapses in milliseconds. no human can react fast enough to keep it stable. so he stopped trying to do it himself. he handed the control loop to an AI. the model reads the sensor data hundreds of times a second, predicts how the plasma is about to move, and adjusts the magnetic fields before it ever drifts out of line. it does not wait for the plasma to misbehave. it sees it coming and corrects it before it happens. the same reaction-before-the-event speed no person could ever match. this is the exact kind of build people are tearing apart inside Neuro Club. not to make reactors, but because the workflow is identical for anything hard. let the AI run the loop, predict the problem, fix it before it breaks. same playbook whether it is plasma or a business. then the post went out. within days Elon's fusion team reached out. they did not ask him to interview for an entry role. they handed him a 400 thousand dollar grant and pulled him onto the team building this at scale. one garage build turned a PhD student into an operator for the most ambitious man alive. here is the part that should stop you. he was one guy with a PhD, a garage, and an AI model doing the job that entire teams of physicists used to fail at. the AI was not assisting him. it was the operator. he built the hardware. the machine ran it. and that was enough to get noticed at the very top. most people think AI writes emails and makes pictures. meanwhile someone pointed it at one of the hardest physics problems on earth, held the plasma steady, and got paid by Elon Musk for it. the gap is not between humans and AI anymore. it is between the people who realize what this thing can already do and the people still using it to summarize their inbox.

Born to gamble

347,495 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.
12:36

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.

Stefan.

210,938 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Tim Dillon just said what everyone is thinking. Trump is in “lockstep” with the deep state. “He’s in Iran.” “He kidnapped Maduro.” “Flock cameras are everywhere.” “Surveillance technology’s everywhere.” “The tech people are getting all the money.” “The pace at which unregulated AI is going to grow and become a real problem is harrowing.” “Why isn’t he investigating his own assassination attempt?” “If you were just gonna blame everything on the deep state, then what the hell was the point?” “I’m not saying there’s not some permanent government apparatus.” “I’ve talked about it a million times.” “But for the people that ran on upending the deep state to then come in and blame things on the deep state, it seems like you have to be an idiot for that to work.” “Why did anyone think it would be interesting for this guy to win if he was just going to do all the things that this deep state wants him to do?” “What is he doing that they don’t like?” “Who are these people that are really upset and up in arms with him?” “He seems to be pretty lockstep with all of these people.” Tim Dillon
2:45

Tim Dillon just said what everyone is thinking. Trump is in “lockstep” with the deep state. “He’s in Iran.” “He kidnapped Maduro.” “Flock cameras are everywhere.” “Surveillance technology’s everywhere.” “The tech people are getting all the money.” “The pace at which unregulated AI is going to grow and become a real problem is harrowing.” “Why isn’t he investigating his own assassination attempt?” “If you were just gonna blame everything on the deep state, then what the hell was the point?” “I’m not saying there’s not some permanent government apparatus.” “I’ve talked about it a million times.” “But for the people that ran on upending the deep state to then come in and blame things on the deep state, it seems like you have to be an idiot for that to work.” “Why did anyone think it would be interesting for this guy to win if he was just going to do all the things that this deep state wants him to do?” “What is he doing that they don’t like?” “Who are these people that are really upset and up in arms with him?” “He seems to be pretty lockstep with all of these people.” Tim Dillon

Holden Culotta

282,403 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)
3:14

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)

Ihtesham Ali

19,268 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This Amazon driver went viral for “stealing” a 4 dollar cake pop from a porch. It was NOT his fault. He saw the sign to take one out of the cooler and since so many people leave snacks for drivers he took one …. Well the cake pop business posted it all over social media and called him a thief EVEN AFTER he said sorry and explained the misunderstanding…offered to give them the $4. They posted his pic all over social media, how petty! So he got this tattoo 🤣
0:33

This Amazon driver went viral for “stealing” a 4 dollar cake pop from a porch. It was NOT his fault. He saw the sign to take one out of the cooler and since so many people leave snacks for drivers he took one …. Well the cake pop business posted it all over social media and called him a thief EVEN AFTER he said sorry and explained the misunderstanding…offered to give them the $4. They posted his pic all over social media, how petty! So he got this tattoo 🤣

🌷 LIZZIE🌷

17,433 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“Just give them your stuff and you’ll be fine.” That’s the lie people repeat until a case like this exposes it. A man in London was targeted over what the robbers believed was a £300,000 watch. The watch was fake. He was outnumbered. He had every incentive to hand it over and survive. They stabbed him anyway. That is the problem with the compliance argument. It only counts the people who handed over their property and lived to tell the story. It ignores the people who complied and still got hurt, because they are not around to explain what went wrong. This man was not in a negotiation. He was marked before he ever left the restaurant. A security guard allegedly filmed him, sent the information out, and four men followed him to his car. So where was the compliance supposed to happen? Gun control did not stop the violence. Disarming normal people did not remove evil from the street. It just left the victim with fewer options when evil showed up. If you choose to comply in that moment, that is your call. But do not legislate the rest of us into your victim mentality.
2:15

“Just give them your stuff and you’ll be fine.” That’s the lie people repeat until a case like this exposes it. A man in London was targeted over what the robbers believed was a £300,000 watch. The watch was fake. He was outnumbered. He had every incentive to hand it over and survive. They stabbed him anyway. That is the problem with the compliance argument. It only counts the people who handed over their property and lived to tell the story. It ignores the people who complied and still got hurt, because they are not around to explain what went wrong. This man was not in a negotiation. He was marked before he ever left the restaurant. A security guard allegedly filmed him, sent the information out, and four men followed him to his car. So where was the compliance supposed to happen? Gun control did not stop the violence. Disarming normal people did not remove evil from the street. It just left the victim with fewer options when evil showed up. If you choose to comply in that moment, that is your call. But do not legislate the rest of us into your victim mentality.

Colion Noir

47,249 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Every serious analyst has called Elon Musk's Terafab unrealistic. The CEO of the company that supplies the machines to build it just said it is an upside opportunity and compared it to the largest chip buildouts in history. That is not a small statement. ASML makes the lithography machines that every advanced semiconductor fab on earth depends on. You cannot print a chip without them. There is no workaround. There is no alternative supplier. If the Terafab gets built, every single machine inside it comes from one company. The interviewer asked the ASML CEO directly about one terawatt of compute power. He did not laugh. He did not hedge. He compared it to the massive DRAM megaprojects in Korea and said new projects at that scale are exactly the kind of upside ASML is positioned for. His exact words: "New projects are opportunity." Then he said something that most people missed. He said ASML is already watching the Terafab very carefully. Tracking when things will happen. At what speed. That is not how you talk about a fantasy project. The mainstream take on the Terafab is that Musk is dreaming. The CEO of the most critical company in the entire chip supply chain just said he is preparing for it. Those are not the same position. (Watch the full 11 minutes Interview at Bloomberg TV on YouTube)
0:37

Every serious analyst has called Elon Musk's Terafab unrealistic. The CEO of the company that supplies the machines to build it just said it is an upside opportunity and compared it to the largest chip buildouts in history. That is not a small statement. ASML makes the lithography machines that every advanced semiconductor fab on earth depends on. You cannot print a chip without them. There is no workaround. There is no alternative supplier. If the Terafab gets built, every single machine inside it comes from one company. The interviewer asked the ASML CEO directly about one terawatt of compute power. He did not laugh. He did not hedge. He compared it to the massive DRAM megaprojects in Korea and said new projects at that scale are exactly the kind of upside ASML is positioned for. His exact words: "New projects are opportunity." Then he said something that most people missed. He said ASML is already watching the Terafab very carefully. Tracking when things will happen. At what speed. That is not how you talk about a fantasy project. The mainstream take on the Terafab is that Musk is dreaming. The CEO of the most critical company in the entire chip supply chain just said he is preparing for it. Those are not the same position. (Watch the full 11 minutes Interview at Bloomberg TV on YouTube)

Ihtesham Ali

67,385 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Koh: His father did not want him to go. And the only access he had to his daughter was listening to his daughter cry in the background. In a one minute call, that four year old did not get access to a doctor, despite the fact of having stage four cancer, did not have his medication with him when he was deported. An American citizen to Honduras. This is what this president is doing. He is twisting the definition of the constitution, and people like you are disparaging character to try to justify that.
1:07

Koh: His father did not want him to go. And the only access he had to his daughter was listening to his daughter cry in the background. In a one minute call, that four year old did not get access to a doctor, despite the fact of having stage four cancer, did not have his medication with him when he was deported. An American citizen to Honduras. This is what this president is doing. He is twisting the definition of the constitution, and people like you are disparaging character to try to justify that.

Acyn

186,169 просмотров • 1 год назад

🔥Holy Smokes: Stephen Miller takes a smug, combative Kasie Hunt to the WOODSHED as she tries to “gotcha” on Trump using an autopen, ignoring the ACTUAL POINT: "This is the most important point. It's not just that Joe Biden used the auto pen - it's that he didn't know it. He was not briefed on it. He was not aware of it. He did not approve it. He was not mentally aware of what the government was doing." “Biden didn’t know what was being signed in his name." My goodness. And CNN wonders why their ratings are a raging dumpster fire.
1:43

🔥Holy Smokes: Stephen Miller takes a smug, combative Kasie Hunt to the WOODSHED as she tries to “gotcha” on Trump using an autopen, ignoring the ACTUAL POINT: "This is the most important point. It's not just that Joe Biden used the auto pen - it's that he didn't know it. He was not briefed on it. He was not aware of it. He did not approve it. He was not mentally aware of what the government was doing." “Biden didn’t know what was being signed in his name." My goodness. And CNN wonders why their ratings are a raging dumpster fire.

Western Lensman

800,780 просмотров • 1 год назад

WOW: A former Columbia University student who witnessed the brutal mu*der of two Israeli embassy staff members in D.C. last night says what he saw in the sh**ter’s eyes was no different from what he saw in the eyes of Columbia University pro-Hamas terrorist supporters. “They have called for intifada revolution, which is the same thing he yelled last night.” Jonathan Epstein: “What I saw in his eyes. I mean, I went to Columbia [University] for grad school and I saw the same thing in his eyes that I saw in the eyes of all the protesters at Columbia. Nothing different between him and then.” CNN Host: “But they did not create this horrific sh**ting.” Jonathan Epstein: *Not buying it* “They gave permission. They gave the permission. And they have called for this. They have called for intifada revolution, which is the same thing he yelled last night.” CNN Host: “Do you worry there will be a conflation though of the two — those people who are speaking their mind who really care about what’s happening in Gaza and those people who are like this person?” Jonathan Epstein: “A conflation? I mean they are calling for intifada. At Columbia University they call for intifada constantly. They’re not quietly. They’re loud… You can hear it. They make recordings of themselves. So what’s the difference?”
2:13

WOW: A former Columbia University student who witnessed the brutal mu*der of two Israeli embassy staff members in D.C. last night says what he saw in the sh**ter’s eyes was no different from what he saw in the eyes of Columbia University pro-Hamas terrorist supporters. “They have called for intifada revolution, which is the same thing he yelled last night.” Jonathan Epstein: “What I saw in his eyes. I mean, I went to Columbia [University] for grad school and I saw the same thing in his eyes that I saw in the eyes of all the protesters at Columbia. Nothing different between him and then.” CNN Host: “But they did not create this horrific sh**ting.” Jonathan Epstein: *Not buying it* “They gave permission. They gave the permission. And they have called for this. They have called for intifada revolution, which is the same thing he yelled last night.” CNN Host: “Do you worry there will be a conflation though of the two — those people who are speaking their mind who really care about what’s happening in Gaza and those people who are like this person?” Jonathan Epstein: “A conflation? I mean they are calling for intifada. At Columbia University they call for intifada constantly. They’re not quietly. They’re loud… You can hear it. They make recordings of themselves. So what’s the difference?”

RedWave Press

942,180 просмотров • 1 год назад

Quentin Tarantino recounts a dinner with Robert De Niro during the making of Jackie Brown, where he asked him whether he understood when he landed the role of Vito in The Godfather Part II, that it would change his life. De Niro’s answer revealed a great deal about his mindset at the time. “I was working with Robert De Niro on Jackie brown, and we went out to dinner once. - When he got Vito in the Godfather Part II, that was going to be a big thing for him. He won the Oscar for it - it set him up to be a movie star. So I asked him - and I've asked this to quite a few actors when it comes to when they got the role that would end up changing their career - did he realize that the moment when he got the role, that it would have this sort of effect? And he goes oh, “I tried not to let it do that. I tried not to think about that” I go, "really? and why did you try not to think about that?" “Well because I’ve seen it happen and then go the other way” And then he used an example. “There was this guy, he was a young actor, and he was part of our crowd in New York. He'd been doing okay, but we were all in the same boat. Then all of a sudden he got a lead role. He's one of the two leads in a brand new movie by a director who had just done a smash hit.” And he's talking about Larry Pierce (the director) and uh... Goodbye Columbus. ”And he started dining out on it. And all of a sudden I go to the places that we used to go to, and now he's there and everyone's kind of revolving around him. He's kind of holding court. He's not doing anything bad; he's just arisen in the way that none of us have - and we're all treating him different. Then the movie comes out; nobody likes it - The movie comes out, and it goes away, and he's exactly in the same place he was. And I just wanted to make sure that that would never happen to me because I watched it happen to him.” Quote from Video Archives Podcast, sourced from James Whale Bake Sale YouTube channel. Clip below from the Godfather Part II (1974)
2:14

Quentin Tarantino recounts a dinner with Robert De Niro during the making of Jackie Brown, where he asked him whether he understood when he landed the role of Vito in The Godfather Part II, that it would change his life. De Niro’s answer revealed a great deal about his mindset at the time. “I was working with Robert De Niro on Jackie brown, and we went out to dinner once. - When he got Vito in the Godfather Part II, that was going to be a big thing for him. He won the Oscar for it - it set him up to be a movie star. So I asked him - and I've asked this to quite a few actors when it comes to when they got the role that would end up changing their career - did he realize that the moment when he got the role, that it would have this sort of effect? And he goes oh, “I tried not to let it do that. I tried not to think about that” I go, "really? and why did you try not to think about that?" “Well because I’ve seen it happen and then go the other way” And then he used an example. “There was this guy, he was a young actor, and he was part of our crowd in New York. He'd been doing okay, but we were all in the same boat. Then all of a sudden he got a lead role. He's one of the two leads in a brand new movie by a director who had just done a smash hit.” And he's talking about Larry Pierce (the director) and uh... Goodbye Columbus. ”And he started dining out on it. And all of a sudden I go to the places that we used to go to, and now he's there and everyone's kind of revolving around him. He's kind of holding court. He's not doing anything bad; he's just arisen in the way that none of us have - and we're all treating him different. Then the movie comes out; nobody likes it - The movie comes out, and it goes away, and he's exactly in the same place he was. And I just wanted to make sure that that would never happen to me because I watched it happen to him.” Quote from Video Archives Podcast, sourced from James Whale Bake Sale YouTube channel. Clip below from the Godfather Part II (1974)

Gangster Cinema Central

97,708 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

December 16, 2016. Obama does an hour long interview with NPR. The entire interview is stunning for a few reasons. 1. Almost everything Obama says is in direct contradiction to the intelligence report on the election that he had just recently received. The majority of this interview was spent discussing Russia's election interference to help Trump. We now know that Obama had just received a report informing him that did not happen. 2. It was extremely obvious throughout the entire interview that Obama was lying and that he knew the significance of what he was doing. 3. Obama finished the interview, left and returned to talk about a new "Intelligence Assessment" that would be dropping before Trump's inauguration. He was priming the media to be on the look out for the bogus report he had just asked for. It's impossible to overstate the magnitude of what Obama was doing during this interview. And of course he turned to NPR to help him do his dirty work.
5:32

December 16, 2016. Obama does an hour long interview with NPR. The entire interview is stunning for a few reasons. 1. Almost everything Obama says is in direct contradiction to the intelligence report on the election that he had just recently received. The majority of this interview was spent discussing Russia's election interference to help Trump. We now know that Obama had just received a report informing him that did not happen. 2. It was extremely obvious throughout the entire interview that Obama was lying and that he knew the significance of what he was doing. 3. Obama finished the interview, left and returned to talk about a new "Intelligence Assessment" that would be dropping before Trump's inauguration. He was priming the media to be on the look out for the bogus report he had just asked for. It's impossible to overstate the magnitude of what Obama was doing during this interview. And of course he turned to NPR to help him do his dirty work.

MAZE

1,101,031 просмотров • 1 год назад

A CARNEGIE MELLON PROFESSOR WAS TOLD HE HAD 3 TO 6 MONTHS TO LIVE. One month later he walked into a packed auditorium. His name was Randy Pausch. He was 46 years old. He had terminal pancreatic cancer. He had three children under the age of 6. And he stood on that stage and gave the most joyful lecture ever recorded. He did not talk about dying. He did not talk about regret. He did not talk about the unfairness of what was happening to him. He talked about achieving childhood dreams. He did one-armed push-ups on stage to prove he was still strong. He made the audience laugh for 76 minutes straight. He said: "We cannot change the cards we are dealt. Just how we play the hand." The video hit 20 million views overnight. Oprah called. Congress called. He testified before the Senate about pancreatic cancer funding. He got a cameo in Star Trek because the director heard his story and personally invited him. He wrote a book that sold 5 million copies in 48 languages. He died 10 months after the lecture. He was 47 years old. The bridge connecting computer science and the arts at Carnegie Mellon is named after him. Because Randy Pausch spent his entire career connecting the two. Watch the lecture tonight. 4 minutes that will permanently change how you think about time. Bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT for more stories about people who used their time better than anyone else alive.
4:42

A CARNEGIE MELLON PROFESSOR WAS TOLD HE HAD 3 TO 6 MONTHS TO LIVE. One month later he walked into a packed auditorium. His name was Randy Pausch. He was 46 years old. He had terminal pancreatic cancer. He had three children under the age of 6. And he stood on that stage and gave the most joyful lecture ever recorded. He did not talk about dying. He did not talk about regret. He did not talk about the unfairness of what was happening to him. He talked about achieving childhood dreams. He did one-armed push-ups on stage to prove he was still strong. He made the audience laugh for 76 minutes straight. He said: "We cannot change the cards we are dealt. Just how we play the hand." The video hit 20 million views overnight. Oprah called. Congress called. He testified before the Senate about pancreatic cancer funding. He got a cameo in Star Trek because the director heard his story and personally invited him. He wrote a book that sold 5 million copies in 48 languages. He died 10 months after the lecture. He was 47 years old. The bridge connecting computer science and the arts at Carnegie Mellon is named after him. Because Randy Pausch spent his entire career connecting the two. Watch the lecture tonight. 4 minutes that will permanently change how you think about time. Bookmark this. Follow CyrilXBT for more stories about people who used their time better than anyone else alive.

CyrilXBT

22,278 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

“When I saw Jayson Tatum in the moment he did his “We Did It” he looked like he got it…. Its the culmination of all of the stuff to get there” Real shyt, when Jayson Tatum did the “We did it” moment that to me felt like it all clicked for him. It was a rush of visualizing all of the trials and tribulations over the years to get to this point. The C’s aint no microwave made team, this was a team that has been built and molded for years now. This is the process it takes to build championship DNA lord and they just getting started 💯
0:49

“When I saw Jayson Tatum in the moment he did his “We Did It” he looked like he got it…. Its the culmination of all of the stuff to get there” Real shyt, when Jayson Tatum did the “We did it” moment that to me felt like it all clicked for him. It was a rush of visualizing all of the trials and tribulations over the years to get to this point. The C’s aint no microwave made team, this was a team that has been built and molded for years now. This is the process it takes to build championship DNA lord and they just getting started 💯

Kevin Garnett

158,622 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Also, there's a specific part that was completely misunderstood and taken entirely out of context! CHANYEOL was just explaining that he was super thin at debut (1st pic), then got obsessed with bulking up after his military discharge (2nd pic). He already shared before that he went through a hard time back then, and in this clip, he was JUST ADDRESSING the fans' reactions to that period. Then, he found a healthy, balanced routine that got him to his current body (last pic) which he achieved entirely for himself and because HE wanted to, NOT because it’s what fans preferred When one of the MCs asked him about fan preferences, he just answered that they usually like lean figures (WHICH IS WAY TOO FAR FROM HIS CURRENT BUILD). He was literally just answering a question, NOT saying that’s how he OR the members supposed to look! He was just saying he advised the members not to get too obsessed with bulking up THE WAY HE DID! He was referring to the unhealthy mindset and habits that came with it. He NEVER once told them to lose weight “가시” The build that fans prefer is something that neither CHANYEOL NOR any of the members look like, AND HE NEVER told anyone to look like that. I just hope people watch the full video and understand the full context instead of relying on mistranslations and misinformation that take his words completely OUT OF CONTEXT 🙏
1:35

Also, there's a specific part that was completely misunderstood and taken entirely out of context! CHANYEOL was just explaining that he was super thin at debut (1st pic), then got obsessed with bulking up after his military discharge (2nd pic). He already shared before that he went through a hard time back then, and in this clip, he was JUST ADDRESSING the fans' reactions to that period. Then, he found a healthy, balanced routine that got him to his current body (last pic) which he achieved entirely for himself and because HE wanted to, NOT because it’s what fans preferred When one of the MCs asked him about fan preferences, he just answered that they usually like lean figures (WHICH IS WAY TOO FAR FROM HIS CURRENT BUILD). He was literally just answering a question, NOT saying that’s how he OR the members supposed to look! He was just saying he advised the members not to get too obsessed with bulking up THE WAY HE DID! He was referring to the unhealthy mindset and habits that came with it. He NEVER once told them to lose weight “가시” The build that fans prefer is something that neither CHANYEOL NOR any of the members look like, AND HE NEVER told anyone to look like that. I just hope people watch the full video and understand the full context instead of relying on mistranslations and misinformation that take his words completely OUT OF CONTEXT 🙏

PCY BASE

10,958 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад