Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

A 19-YEAR-OLD DEVELOPER FROM VIETNAM TURNED 6 CLAUDE DESIGN FILES INTO A $12,600/MONTH BRAND SYSTEM most people open claude design and ask for one pretty carousel. he treated it like a production room: logo, brand kit, landing page, pitch deck, mobile app screens and launch creatives from one visual... system. the first 48 hours were a credit burner. 70+ messy prompts, 14 layout resets, 3 different color directions and almost nothing usable. the problem was not claude design, it was starting before the brand was clear. then he moved the thinking outside the tool. audience, offer, pricing, visual references, colors and tone were written first. after that, each generation had a job instead of becoming another random experiment. the real unlock was building the design system before the website. typography, spacing, cards, buttons, inputs and hierarchy became the base layer. once that was locked, every asset looked like it came from the same studio. in 11 days he packaged it into 3 client-ready offers: a $1,500 landing page, a $2,800 investor deck and a $4,200 full launch kit. same system, different outputs, way less redesign. fewer prompts. tighter edits. one brand system. read the article below before you burn credits.show more

Gipp 🦅

8,131 subscribers

11,913 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

HE TURNED A $9,000 UI HANDOFF INTO A 3D SAAS INTERFACE IN 30 MINUTES this guy didn’t build another flat dashboard, he built a living 3d workspace with Claude Code reading the structure, logic and components instead of guessing from screenshots Moonchild makes the design system first: tokens, spacing, cards, charts, navigation, typography, then Claude turns it into a working React app through MCP 2 tools, 1 design system, 8+ screens and a second Claude checking drift while most founders still pay agencies to align buttons by hand save the full breakdown before your next SaaS looks like 6 templates fighting for custody of the same logo ↓

Gipp 🦅

11,008 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

how to use Google's NEW open source Design.md + AI Skills to make your startup look like a $100 million company in 1 hour: 1. Design.md is an open source file from Google that captures the soul of a design. Typography, colors, spacing, all in one markdown file. You attach it to your prompt and your agent builds beautiful things every time. 2. Think of it this way. The HTML is the finished dish. The design.md is the recipe. The skills are the ingredients. Put them together and everything you build looks consistent and professional. 3. Don't create a design system from scratch. Find a brand you love. Linear, Stripe, Vercel, whatever resonates. Study it. Use ChatGPT or Claude to help you extract the design language into your own design.md file. 4. Build skills on top of your design.md. A landing page skill. A mobile app skill. A motion design skill. A slide deck skill. Each one references the same design.md so everything looks like it came from the same designer. 5. The biggest mistake people make: they nail one screen and then everything else looks generic. Design.md solves this. One file keeps every page, every format, every medium consistent. 6. Use it across everything. Your landing page. Your app. Your pitch deck. Your promo videos. Same DNA. Same taste. Same system. That's what separates a startup that looks real from one that looks vibe-coded. 7. Build a second brain for design inspiration. When you see something beautiful in the real world or online, capture it. Save it. When you're building something new, reference it. Taste is developed, not downloaded. 8. It's obvious but the difference between a product people trust and a product people bounce from is how it looks and feels. Design.md gives you that edge. you can watch below shoutout to Meng To for coming on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 and walking through his full workflow. if you want to use AI to actually build gorgeous designs, you'll want to use see this. watch

GREG ISENBERG

506,491 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Claude Design is f*cking ridiculous 🤯 Claude Design now lets DTC brands and agencies rebuild any high-performing email — logo, hero, headline, CTA button, comparison table, brand colors — in 20 minutes. One reference email + a pre-loaded brand design system + a structured prompt = a finished, on-brand email you can preview as HTML. All inside Claude Design. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still paying email agencies $3-5K/month to design flows that take 2 weeks to ship. If you're sitting on a welcome series, abandoned cart, and post-purchase flow that hasn't been touched in 6 months because the design lift is too painful... This workflow eliminates the entire bottleneck: → Build a design system in Claude Design once (brand colors, fonts, logo, button styling) → Upload a screenshot of any email you want to rebuild as your reference → Use Claude to write a structured prompt that maps every section top-to-bottom (promo bar, logo, headline, CTA, hero, body, table, footer) → Drop the reference image + the prompt into Claude Design at high fidelity → Iterate inline — swap the hero image, fix button styling, color-pick brand colors directly from the original No briefing a designer. No waiting 2 weeks for V1. No paying an agency $4K/month for 4 emails. What you get: → Win-back, welcome, abandoned cart, and post-purchase emails designed in under an hour each → A reusable brand design system that every new email pulls from automatically → Full inline editing — fonts, colors, buttons, images all editable in the canvas → HTML preview ready to hand off to your ESP Built 100% in with Claude Design. I put together a full playbook showing the design system setup, the exact structured prompt format, and the inline editing workflow. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "DESIGN" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

31,732 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Every frontend developer just stopped opening DevTools. Your AI coding agent can now reverse-engineer the entire design system of any website directly from the terminal. Just type: /design And it instantly extracts: • Brand colors • Fonts & typography • Spacing system • Buttons & UI components • Layout patterns • Design tokens Then saves everything into a structured DESIGN.md file your AI agent can understand and reuse. Powered by Hyperbrowser + Claude Code MCP. The crazy part? You can now study, replicate, and rebuild world-class UI systems in minutes instead of wasting hours manually inspecting websites. This changes how vibe coding works forever. Repo👇

divyansh tiwari

78,201 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Claude Code is CRACKED at design now and I don't think people understand how BIG this is. There is now one tool that takes you from a rough idea to fully designed, agency-tier, App Store-ready screens in minutes. One design system, every screen, real native code. Most builders hand design to Claude Code, get AI-default screens, and wonder why their app looks like every other vibe coded project. This is the 3-step workflow that fixes it: (full breakdown in the article)

Claude Code is CRACKED at design now and I don't think people understand how BIG this is. There is now one tool that takes you from a rough idea to fully designed, agency-tier, App Store-ready screens in minutes. One design system, every screen, real native code. Most builders hand design to Claude Code, get AI-default screens, and wonder why their app looks like every other vibe coded project. This is the 3-step workflow that fixes it: (full breakdown in the article)

Prajwal Tomar

105,433 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

Anthropic released Claude Design TODAY and it's now accessible at I spent the last hour giving it a first look, and shared my thoughts and results in the video below. This is a BIG drop. This is a new design surface from Anthropic, and it changes what "AI design" means. Short version: Claude can now design. Not "describe a design." Not "generate an image of a design." Actual production work — prototypes, wireframes, high-fidelity mocks, slide decks, landing pages — editable, on-brand, and ready to hand off. Here's what stood out on first look: → Real design surfaces Prototypes, wireframes, hi-fi, and slide decks — each with templates and proper structure, not just pretty screenshots. → Comment-based edits Leave a comment on any element and Claude revises it. This is the Figma-style review loop, with the designer replaced by a model that works at 3am. → Brand design systems You can feed it your system — colors, type, components — and it actually respects it. On-brand output, not generic AI slop. → Export anywhere PDF, PowerPoint, Canva, standalone HTML. Plus a built-in handoff straight to Claude Code for engineers to implement. → Import from real tools Figma, GitHub, and captured web elements come in as inputs. Your existing work is the starting line, not the discard pile. → Collaboration Share links for view / comment / edit — the exact tier system teams already expect. What I tested on Opus 4.7: • A 5-slide deck generated from a single screenshot. Claude asked clarifying questions BEFORE generating and shipped speaker notes by default. • A landing page build. Solid first pass, real components, real layout logic. • Multiple chats running concurrently. You can parallelize design work across threads like a small team. Why this matters: PMs, founders, marketers, and non-engineers can now create designs that engineers can actually ship with production-ready output and a claude code handoff built in. The gap between "I have an idea" and "here's a working prototype with my brand applied" just collapsed to minutes. Full walkthrough, live demos, exports, and honest takes on where it breaks below. P.S. • This is an Anthropic Labs product — NOT GA yet. • Claude Design is currently webapp only (no API), and does not yet support the Analytics API, Compliance API, or cost/usage reporting. • Availability: – Default ON for Pro / Max / Team – Default OFF for Enterprise Enterprise admins can toggle it on via RBAC in console (comes with a ~$20/user initial credit).

JJ Englert

32,445 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

I still don't think people understand what just happened with Claude Code. There is now one tool that takes you from a rough idea to fully designed, agency-tier, App Store-ready screens in minutes. One design system, every screen, real native code. Most builders hand design to Claude Code, get AI-default screens, and wonder why their app looks like every other vibe coded project. This is the 3-step workflow that fixes it: (full breakdown in the article)

I still don't think people understand what just happened with Claude Code. There is now one tool that takes you from a rough idea to fully designed, agency-tier, App Store-ready screens in minutes. One design system, every screen, real native code. Most builders hand design to Claude Code, get AI-default screens, and wonder why their app looks like every other vibe coded project. This is the 3-step workflow that fixes it: (full breakdown in the article)

Prajwal Tomar

146,206 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

A 33-year-old Sarah from Brooklyn sold a website to a restaurant for $8,000, and it took her 7 hours She used a new tool, Claude Design, for which she spent $20/month She posted her ads on free freelance websites, and Claude created a business card for her 2 days later, a restaurant that opened a week ago writes to her: they need a website She names a price of $8,000, and they agree if they like everything She described the idea, and Claude came up with everything, with the ability to edit every detail. 7 hours later, the website was ready She sent it to the client, and they were thrilled: the deal was made The full instructions are already in the article

A 33-year-old Sarah from Brooklyn sold a website to a restaurant for $8,000, and it took her 7 hours She used a new tool, Claude Design, for which she spent $20/month She posted her ads on free freelance websites, and Claude created a business card for her 2 days later, a restaurant that opened a week ago writes to her: they need a website She names a price of $8,000, and they agree if they like everything She described the idea, and Claude came up with everything, with the ability to edit every detail. 7 hours later, the website was ready She sent it to the client, and they were thrilled: the deal was made The full instructions are already in the article

Bober_smart

28,950 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.

Gipp 🦅

14,871 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Most people use Claude Code like a chatbot, then wonder why it forgets everything by Tuesday. The ones quietly building $10K AI workflows give it a second brain instead, and it’s free. It’s called Obsidian. You download it, point it at one folder on your computer, and that folder becomes a vault. Every note inside it is now something Claude Code can read end to end. Open Claude in that folder and it’s connected, that simple. The trick isn’t the tool, it’s the map. 3 folders, that’s the whole system. Raw, you dump everything here. Notes, transcripts, screenshots, half thoughts, zero structure. Wiki, Claude reads the raw pile and writes clean Wikipedia style articles about it, structured, searchable, permanent. Output, when you want a deliverable, a PDF, a slide deck, a script, it pulls from the wiki and ships it. Most people skip the wiki layer and feed Claude a junk drawer of 400 files, then blame the model when the answers are garbage. The model isn’t the problem, your folder is. Give it a path it can follow and it finds anything in 1 second, give it chaos and it guesses. You don’t even have to design the structure yourself. Open the vault, tell Claude to build a file system that fits your work, and watch it organize your entire brain in one prompt. Free tool, 3 folders, a second brain that compounds while you sleep. The people falling behind are still copy pasting into a chat window.

Most people use Claude Code like a chatbot, then wonder why it forgets everything by Tuesday. The ones quietly building $10K AI workflows give it a second brain instead, and it’s free. It’s called Obsidian. You download it, point it at one folder on your computer, and that folder becomes a vault. Every note inside it is now something Claude Code can read end to end. Open Claude in that folder and it’s connected, that simple. The trick isn’t the tool, it’s the map. 3 folders, that’s the whole system. Raw, you dump everything here. Notes, transcripts, screenshots, half thoughts, zero structure. Wiki, Claude reads the raw pile and writes clean Wikipedia style articles about it, structured, searchable, permanent. Output, when you want a deliverable, a PDF, a slide deck, a script, it pulls from the wiki and ships it. Most people skip the wiki layer and feed Claude a junk drawer of 400 files, then blame the model when the answers are garbage. The model isn’t the problem, your folder is. Give it a path it can follow and it finds anything in 1 second, give it chaos and it guesses. You don’t even have to design the structure yourself. Open the vault, tell Claude to build a file system that fits your work, and watch it organize your entire brain in one prompt. Free tool, 3 folders, a second brain that compounds while you sleep. The people falling behind are still copy pasting into a chat window.

West Lord

32,731 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude Code creator: "100% of our pull requests at Anrtopic are run by Claude Code. 80–90% of code review too. The feature I’m using the most today is /loops. I’m not prompting Claude anymore - I’m building loops" in this interview he breaks down exactly how a system changes everything: - the memory and context features that turn Claude into a second brain - the knowledge architecture most users don't know Claude can build - the integration layer that connects Claude to your actual workflow - why typing one question at a time is the most expensive way to use Claude if you've been using Claude for months and still start every conversation from scratch with zero context, you don't have a Claude problem. you have a system problem instead of another show tonight, watch this make sure to bookmark it before it gets lost in your feed full guide in the article below

Claude Code creator: "100% of our pull requests at Anrtopic are run by Claude Code. 80–90% of code review too. The feature I’m using the most today is /loops. I’m not prompting Claude anymore - I’m building loops" in this interview he breaks down exactly how a system changes everything: - the memory and context features that turn Claude into a second brain - the knowledge architecture most users don't know Claude can build - the integration layer that connects Claude to your actual workflow - why typing one question at a time is the most expensive way to use Claude if you've been using Claude for months and still start every conversation from scratch with zero context, you don't have a Claude problem. you have a system problem instead of another show tonight, watch this make sure to bookmark it before it gets lost in your feed full guide in the article below

Khairallah AL-Awady

39,243 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

19-year-old Vietnamese student built himself a second brain through Claude and Obsidian - and made $18,000 in his first month. Every morning Claude already knows who he is, what he's working on, which tasks are open and which ideas were captured a month ago - no reminders, no manual searching. He drops an article into a folder - Claude reads it, writes a summary, updates the index and links 10-15 related pages in one pass. Set up a cron job once at 7:30 AM - now a briefing with all his tasks and new materials is waiting before he even gets out of bed. Published the system as a course on Gumroad - $97 for access, 186 sales in the first month. Vannevar Bush described this idea back in 1945 and called it the Memex - but couldn't solve one question: who does the maintenance. Now the answer is known - Claude. And a 19-year-old student from Hanoi is already selling that answer for $18,000 a month.

19-year-old Vietnamese student built himself a second brain through Claude and Obsidian - and made $18,000 in his first month. Every morning Claude already knows who he is, what he's working on, which tasks are open and which ideas were captured a month ago - no reminders, no manual searching. He drops an article into a folder - Claude reads it, writes a summary, updates the index and links 10-15 related pages in one pass. Set up a cron job once at 7:30 AM - now a briefing with all his tasks and new materials is waiting before he even gets out of bed. Published the system as a course on Gumroad - $97 for access, 186 sales in the first month. Vannevar Bush described this idea back in 1945 and called it the Memex - but couldn't solve one question: who does the maintenance. Now the answer is known - Claude. And a 19-year-old student from Hanoi is already selling that answer for $18,000 a month.

Cortex

24,389 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I just built a Brand Operating System inside Claude Cowork 🤯 A connected system of files that every skill automatically reads from, so your hook writer, brief generator, and script writer all speak in your exact brand voice. All inside Claude Cowork. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies tired of generic AI output that sounds like every other brand in their category. If you're opening a new Claude chat and re-explaining your brand, re-pasting your voice guidelines, and re-describing your customers every single time, a Brand OS fixes the entire loop: → Build 3 foundation files once per brand → Every skill you create reads from the Brand OS automatically → Hook writer pulls your voice + customer pain points → Brief generator pulls your positioning + angles → Script writer pulls the brief + brand DNA → Every output is calibrated to your brand on the first pass No re-briefing Claude on every chat. No editing for an hour to fix generic AI phrasing. No creative that sounds like it could belong to any brand. What you get in the playbook: → The exact Brand OS file structure I use → Templates for all 3 files you can fill in for any brand → The architecture that makes every Claude skill 10x sharper → The exact setup for agencies running a Brand OS per client For agencies: this is how you build a perfect, reusable knowledge base for every client on your roster. Set up the Brand OS once per client, and every campaign after that is already calibrated. I put together a full playbook with the file templates, the architecture, and the exact setup process so you can build your own Brand OS for your brand or your clients. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "OS" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

30,186 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A DEVELOPER CONNECTED CLAUDE CODE TO OBSIDIAN SO HIS AI AGENT WOULD STOP FORGETTING THE PROJECT EVERY MORNING. Every coding session used to start the same way. Claude would understand the repo, fix the bug, explain the architecture, and then the moment the session ended, all of that context disappeared. Same codebase. Same decisions. Same architecture. Same mistakes repeated again. So he added a memory layer. Instead of treating Claude Code like a smart terminal, he connected it to a local Obsidian vault through MCP. Now Claude can read the repo, open the vault, create notes, link concepts, and write important decisions back into the system. When it studies the codebase, it does not just answer once and forget. It creates notes for the major services, maps how the architecture works, links auth to the database, connects APIs to storage, and records why certain migrations or design choices exist. Obsidian becomes the project graph. Now when he asks why something was built a certain way, Claude does not guess from the current prompt. It reads the decision notes. When he starts a new branch, Claude checks the active context file. When the work is done, it updates what changed, what is blocked, and what the next agent needs to know before touching the repo. That is the real loop: read context, write code, capture decisions, update memory. Most people are still using AI coding tools like disposable chat windows. Ask, patch, close, forget. This setup turns Claude Code into infrastructure. The repo gets a memory layer that survives every session, and multiple AI agents can work from the same project map without stepping on each other. The unlock is not better prompting. The unlock is giving the agent somewhere to remember what it already learned.

A DEVELOPER CONNECTED CLAUDE CODE TO OBSIDIAN SO HIS AI AGENT WOULD STOP FORGETTING THE PROJECT EVERY MORNING. Every coding session used to start the same way. Claude would understand the repo, fix the bug, explain the architecture, and then the moment the session ended, all of that context disappeared. Same codebase. Same decisions. Same architecture. Same mistakes repeated again. So he added a memory layer. Instead of treating Claude Code like a smart terminal, he connected it to a local Obsidian vault through MCP. Now Claude can read the repo, open the vault, create notes, link concepts, and write important decisions back into the system. When it studies the codebase, it does not just answer once and forget. It creates notes for the major services, maps how the architecture works, links auth to the database, connects APIs to storage, and records why certain migrations or design choices exist. Obsidian becomes the project graph. Now when he asks why something was built a certain way, Claude does not guess from the current prompt. It reads the decision notes. When he starts a new branch, Claude checks the active context file. When the work is done, it updates what changed, what is blocked, and what the next agent needs to know before touching the repo. That is the real loop: read context, write code, capture decisions, update memory. Most people are still using AI coding tools like disposable chat windows. Ask, patch, close, forget. This setup turns Claude Code into infrastructure. The repo gets a memory layer that survives every session, and multiple AI agents can work from the same project map without stepping on each other. The unlock is not better prompting. The unlock is giving the agent somewhere to remember what it already learned.

DegenCalls

20,104 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

A 22-YEAR-OLD FROM BEIJING BUILT A SECOND BRAIN WITH CLAUDE, MAKES $14,000/MONTH AND HIS AI REMEMBERS EVERY DECISION HE'S EVER MADE Most people open ChatGPT, ask a question and start from zero next session, re-explaining the same context every single time and losing 15–40 minutes per session doing it. He built infrastructure where Claude reads, writes and connects everything in Obsidian automatically so it never resets and compounds with every conversation. This morning he needed a client strategy from 3 months ago. Claude pulled it up instantly and drafted a full email reply in under 20 minutes using context it had been building for months across 6,000+ sessions. Every session adds to the last one and the system now saves him 2–3 hours every single day - 30–90 minutes from automated morning briefing alone, before he even opens his laptop. repo: The repo is free. The advantage it creates is not.

A 22-YEAR-OLD FROM BEIJING BUILT A SECOND BRAIN WITH CLAUDE, MAKES $14,000/MONTH AND HIS AI REMEMBERS EVERY DECISION HE'S EVER MADE Most people open ChatGPT, ask a question and start from zero next session, re-explaining the same context every single time and losing 15–40 minutes per session doing it. He built infrastructure where Claude reads, writes and connects everything in Obsidian automatically so it never resets and compounds with every conversation. This morning he needed a client strategy from 3 months ago. Claude pulled it up instantly and drafted a full email reply in under 20 minutes using context it had been building for months across 6,000+ sessions. Every session adds to the last one and the system now saves him 2–3 hours every single day - 30–90 minutes from automated morning briefing alone, before he even opens his laptop. repo: The repo is free. The advantage it creates is not.

Noisy

23,679 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

A CHINESE DEVELOPER ASKED CLAUDE TO FIND A “$1M APP IDEA” AND TURNED IT INTO A $14,800/MONTH APP STORE PORTFOLIO He is not building some huge startup or spending 8 months polishing one perfect product. He picks boring keywords people already search for, opens Claude Code, builds a simple iOS app around one problem, adds onboarding, screenshots and a $6.99 paywall, then ships before the idea gets too complicated. The trick is that every app is almost the same product underneath. Same subscription flow, same settings page, same review prompt, same clean interface. Only the niche changes: plant scanner, receipt cleaner, walking tracker, pet symptom checker, study timer, invoice maker. After 4 months he has 19 apps live, 7 dead ones, and 5 doing most of the money. One app making $300/month looks like nothing, but a few small apps doing $700, $1,200 or $2,000/month becomes real when each build only takes 2-3 days. Claude Code is not the money printer. The money printer is finding demand, shipping fast, and treating every failed app like cheap market research. Small apps. Real system.

A CHINESE DEVELOPER ASKED CLAUDE TO FIND A “$1M APP IDEA” AND TURNED IT INTO A $14,800/MONTH APP STORE PORTFOLIO He is not building some huge startup or spending 8 months polishing one perfect product. He picks boring keywords people already search for, opens Claude Code, builds a simple iOS app around one problem, adds onboarding, screenshots and a $6.99 paywall, then ships before the idea gets too complicated. The trick is that every app is almost the same product underneath. Same subscription flow, same settings page, same review prompt, same clean interface. Only the niche changes: plant scanner, receipt cleaner, walking tracker, pet symptom checker, study timer, invoice maker. After 4 months he has 19 apps live, 7 dead ones, and 5 doing most of the money. One app making $300/month looks like nothing, but a few small apps doing $700, $1,200 or $2,000/month becomes real when each build only takes 2-3 days. Claude Code is not the money printer. The money printer is finding demand, shipping fast, and treating every failed app like cheap market research. Small apps. Real system.

Gipp 🦅

18,839 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Figma Capture + Claude Fable 5 = clone any competitor's landing page in minutes 🤯 Figma just dropped a Chrome extension that copy/pastes any live website into Figma as editable layers. Point Claude Code — running the new Fable 5 model — at the capture, and it rebuilds the whole page in YOUR brand: structure, copy, design system, photography. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who keep losing weeks rebuilding proven landers from scratch. If you're still cloning competitor pages the old way, You're screenshotting their site and praying the AI guesses the structure right. You're rebuilding sections by hand because the fonts and spacing never come out true. You're paying a designer $3K to recreate a page that already exists. This workflow eliminates the entire loop: → Capture the competitor's landing page with Figma's new Chrome extension — editable layers, not screenshots → Claude Code reads the page structure through the Figma MCP: every section, every headline, in order → It rebuilds the page in YOUR brand — your colors, your fonts, your voice (it even respects your banned-words list) → GPT Image 2 generates on-brand product photography from the layer names → Claude places every image automatically — finished page, ready to ship No screenshots. No guessing at structure. No design invoice. What you get: → A pixel-structured clone of any proven lander, rebuilt in your brand → Every line of copy rewritten in your voice → 16 on-brand images generated and placed for ~$2 in API costs → Start to finish in about 15 minutes Built 100% with Figma + Claude Code on Claude Fable 5. I put together a step-by-step playbook showing you exactly how to set it up. Want access for free? > Like this post > Comment "CLONE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

46,671 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

HE BUILT A BRAND SITE THAT LOOKS LIKE IT COST $10,000 - IN ONE EVENING WITH CLAUDE CODE What's on screen isn't a template with a color swap It's a full product brand site with effects most designers reach for Figma plugins to get What's actually on the page: > A headline that glows like it's lit from the inside > The product breaking out of the frame and sitting in front of the text > Typography that stops you mid-scroll > Depth that usually takes a motion designer to pull off > Details so considered it looks like someone art directed every pixel What it normally takes: > A brand designer who knows typography at this level > A frontend developer who knows when to reach for z-index and when not to > Back and forth between them until the details land right The price gap: > Brand site at this quality: $5,000 - $8,000+ > Your cost: a Claude subscription > Timeline: an evening Full walkthrough in the article below

monokern

522,711 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

Remember the old way of making presentations? Starting from a blank slide. Fixing fonts for 20 minutes. Dragging boxes around. Rewriting the same points again and again just to make them “fit.” By the time it looked decent… you were already tired. I tried something different. Gave Gamma one idea: “Build a premium launch deck for a luxury travel brand.” And in minutes, it turned into a polished, presentation-ready strategy: • clear brand positioning • defined audience • strong launch messaging • structured content flow • thoughtful growth ideas No blank slide struggle. No formatting chaos. No starting from zero. That shift is powerful. Creating content isn’t the hard part anymore. Shaping it into something clean, clear, and ready to present is. Gamma makes that part feel easy. Start with something that already works, then make it yours. Create once. Customize infinitely. Give it a shot:

AI StackLab

77,763 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This Chinese developer launched 6 agents under 1 orchestrator, and they run his UI design agency at $32,000 a month on their own. He built a system of 6 agents on Claude Sonnet 4.6 that single-handedly runs his agency for UI auditing and redesign for SaaS startups and e-commerce. No contractors, no project manager, and no team. Just him, a MacBook, and 1 API key. Traditional design agencies out of Shenzhen keep teams of 8 people on salaries for the same volume, while he keeps only API tokens. 6 agents work through a single orchestrator on Claude Code Router. Usage is about 4 million tokens a day, the average API bill is just $480 a month. All 6 go through MCP servers and write shared state to the file system, without shared state in memory and without race conditions. And here is the system prompt he gave the orchestrator before launch: "you are the orchestrator of a one-man UI agency. you delegate read-only research tasks to 5 sub-agents and own all writes. sub-agents: // Hunter (finds SaaS and e-commerce sites with outdated UI) // Auditor (runs each site through Lighthouse, accessibility, and design system checks) // Pitcher (writes cold outreach and redesign proposals with before/after screenshots) // Splitter (breaks accepted projects into typed milestones) // Designer (generates Figma mockups and Tailwind components) // Checker (runs evals on every artifact before it leaves the harness). you never let 2 sub-agents touch 1 file. you stop and request human approval only when an invoice exceeds $5,000 or when the design system eval score drops below 0.88." Meaning the system knows exactly what it is and within what boundaries it operates. It knows it is supposed to find clients on its own. It knows it is supposed to write proposals with screenshots and mockups without intervention. It knows the human only plugs in when the amounts go above $5,000 or when the design system eval does not converge. → The system runs 24 hours a day → Hunter finds about 200 sites with outdated UI a day → Auditor runs each one through Lighthouse and WCAG → Pitcher prepares about 28 personalized proposals with before/after screenshots → Splitter breaks 3 accepted projects per week into milestones → Designer generates mockups and components, Checker runs evals on every artifact And only when the invoice breaks $5,000 or the eval drops below 0.88 does the orchestrator wake the human. Here is what the system outputs in his log during 1 of the sessions: "hunter report, tuesday: 213 sites found, 31 with last redesign before 2020, 14 with Lighthouse score below 65, 6 with active redesign RFP. passing top 6 to auditor." "pitcher: 27 cold outreach sent with before/after screenshots, 5 replies, 3 discovery calls scheduled. passing to splitter." "designer: milestone 2 of Lotus Tea Co redesign complete. Figma frames exported to /Users/dev/agency/clients/lotus/v2. checker running design system evals." "eval flag: proposal for $6,800 exceeds the approved limit of $5,000. sending for manual review." He has no remote server. No separate backend. Just a local file sandbox in /Users/dev/agency, an MCP router, and an API key to Claude. Out of everything I have seen this year, this is the cleanest one-person UI design agency: $480 in, about $32,000 out, and between them 6 prompts and 1 file system.

This Chinese developer launched 6 agents under 1 orchestrator, and they run his UI design agency at $32,000 a month on their own. He built a system of 6 agents on Claude Sonnet 4.6 that single-handedly runs his agency for UI auditing and redesign for SaaS startups and e-commerce. No contractors, no project manager, and no team. Just him, a MacBook, and 1 API key. Traditional design agencies out of Shenzhen keep teams of 8 people on salaries for the same volume, while he keeps only API tokens. 6 agents work through a single orchestrator on Claude Code Router. Usage is about 4 million tokens a day, the average API bill is just $480 a month. All 6 go through MCP servers and write shared state to the file system, without shared state in memory and without race conditions. And here is the system prompt he gave the orchestrator before launch: "you are the orchestrator of a one-man UI agency. you delegate read-only research tasks to 5 sub-agents and own all writes. sub-agents: // Hunter (finds SaaS and e-commerce sites with outdated UI) // Auditor (runs each site through Lighthouse, accessibility, and design system checks) // Pitcher (writes cold outreach and redesign proposals with before/after screenshots) // Splitter (breaks accepted projects into typed milestones) // Designer (generates Figma mockups and Tailwind components) // Checker (runs evals on every artifact before it leaves the harness). you never let 2 sub-agents touch 1 file. you stop and request human approval only when an invoice exceeds $5,000 or when the design system eval score drops below 0.88." Meaning the system knows exactly what it is and within what boundaries it operates. It knows it is supposed to find clients on its own. It knows it is supposed to write proposals with screenshots and mockups without intervention. It knows the human only plugs in when the amounts go above $5,000 or when the design system eval does not converge. → The system runs 24 hours a day → Hunter finds about 200 sites with outdated UI a day → Auditor runs each one through Lighthouse and WCAG → Pitcher prepares about 28 personalized proposals with before/after screenshots → Splitter breaks 3 accepted projects per week into milestones → Designer generates mockups and components, Checker runs evals on every artifact And only when the invoice breaks $5,000 or the eval drops below 0.88 does the orchestrator wake the human. Here is what the system outputs in his log during 1 of the sessions: "hunter report, tuesday: 213 sites found, 31 with last redesign before 2020, 14 with Lighthouse score below 65, 6 with active redesign RFP. passing top 6 to auditor." "pitcher: 27 cold outreach sent with before/after screenshots, 5 replies, 3 discovery calls scheduled. passing to splitter." "designer: milestone 2 of Lotus Tea Co redesign complete. Figma frames exported to /Users/dev/agency/clients/lotus/v2. checker running design system evals." "eval flag: proposal for $6,800 exceeds the approved limit of $5,000. sending for manual review." He has no remote server. No separate backend. Just a local file sandbox in /Users/dev/agency, an MCP router, and an API key to Claude. Out of everything I have seen this year, this is the cleanest one-person UI design agency: $480 in, about $32,000 out, and between them 6 prompts and 1 file system.

Blaze

56,062 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce