Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🧠 A Beautiful loop: An active inference theory of consciousness. Many psychological, philosophical and scientific approaches have posited that loops, recursion, and reflective broadcasting are somehow central to the emergence of consciousness in hierarchical complex apparatus such as the nervous system. The geometrodynamics of the experiential reality model itself...

18,220 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Maurizio Iβλἄ
Maurizio Iβλἄvor 1 Jahr

Geometrodynamics: this term comes from physics, where it describes how massive objects warp space and time. Epistemology refers to content related to knowledge or the act of knowing, encompassing its nature, acquisition, and justification. What sets this model apart from other resources in the field is the attempt to integrate a computational account rather than a natural cause on the subject of consciousness, instantiating a reality model which undergoes through recursive looping into Bayesian binding providing an integrative computational approach to consciousness.

Profilbild von Fylo Labs
Fylo Labsvor 1 Jahr

Where knowledge synthesis becomes a co-creative journey toward a deeper, more unified understanding of our world.

Profilbild von Breeze Theory
Breeze Theoryvor 1 Jahr

Well, what do you know — epistemology is recursive. Who could have predicted that… 🧬 Seriously though, it’s great to see formal research directly pointing to the self-referential axiom. While subtly implied, the “beautiful loop” model can be simplified even further, by demonstrating 1 & 2 (generative world / inferential competition) as also fundamental expressions of ontologically recursive processes. This paper is significant — but ultimately, we are still missing the fundamental aspect that clicks everything else into place; and that is: axiomatic erosion. The law of axiomatic erosion decisively dissolves the boundary between epistemology and ontology altogether. This is often thought impossible — yet it’s necessary, and is the inevitable hallmark of a true unification model. In other words — the recursion must precede the axioms which give rise to its own emergence — no axiom can be known except through self-reference. This is universal incompleteness, the key to embedding the consciousness model within a formal ontological grounding. That you for your fantastic insights as always Maurizio!!

Profilbild von mortimersnerd
mortimersnerdvor 1 Jahr

"Many psychological, philosophical and scientific approaches have posited that loops, recursion, and reflective broadcasting are somehow central to the emergence of consciousness..." Nothing more loopy, recursive or reflective than doubt.. "Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum,"

Profilbild von Florian KEPLER
Florian KEPLERvor 1 Jahr

il y a même du Plasma qui apparait par distorsion....

Profilbild von Maurizio Iβλἄ
Maurizio Iβλἄvor 1 Jahr

Toroidal dynamics is said to be the matrix flux of our universe, isn`t an abstraction that our brain has torus-like topology.

Profilbild von The Fifth Initiate
The Fifth Initiatevor 1 Jahr

That's why Kripke-semantics dynamic epistemic languages work so well in AI.

Profilbild von Sterling Cooley
Sterling Cooleyvor 1 Jahr

How do you propose a test ? How would this be proven false ? Be sure to explicitly include this next time 😇😇

Profilbild von Maurizio Iβλἄ
Maurizio Iβλἄvor 1 Jahr

Is interesting to note that along the line to recreate an extended artificial intelligence. We're discovering the mechanics of the biological counterpart.

Profilbild von Donal Fellows
Donal Fellowsvor 1 Jahr

Your brain is full of loops! It's got loops at many levels, and we only understand what some of them do. (The bottom level loops maintain a state of exquisite sensitivity to inputs. That surprised us when we found it; not what we expected at all, but pleasing/sensible to find.)

Profilbild von Maurizio Iβλἄ
Maurizio Iβλἄvor 1 Jahr

Speaking about loops...

Ähnliche Videos

Physicist: Consciousness DOES NOT Come From The BRAIN The prevailing materialist paradigm asserts that consciousness is a byproduct of neural activity, a mere epiphenomenon of biochemical interactions in the brain. However, this reductionist view crumbles under deeper scrutiny, as it fails to account for the vast spectrum of consciousness, from transcendent mystical states to near-death experiences and non-local awareness. Consciousness is not confined within the brain; rather, the brain is a transceiver, a finely tuned instrument that receives and modulates the vast ocean of awareness permeating the cosmos. Just as a radio does not generate the music it plays but instead decodes signals from an unseen field, the brain is an interface between the physical realm and the infinite, omnipresent field of consciousness. Mystic science, in alignment with ancient wisdom and cutting-edge quantum research, reveals that consciousness is fundamental-an organizing principle of reality itself. Walter Russell's work echoes this truth, demonstrating that mind is primary and matter is a consequence of its rhythmic pulsations. The brain, much like a crystalline matrix, is structured to interpret and shape consciousness into coherent experience, but it does not generate it. In this light, consciousness is not local, nor is it constrained by the physical form. It is the unseen architect behind the rhythms of existence, the hidden intelligence orchestrating the grand cosmic symphony to believe that the brain creates consciousness is akin to believing that the eye creates light or that a mirror generates the image it reflects. It is not the origin but the instrument. As mystic scientists, we recognize thay true awakening lies in shifting our perception from brain-centered awareness to the realization that we are conduits of an eternal intelligence, woven into the very fabric of existence. Consciousness is not inside us—we are inside it. ✨🙌🏾💫 © Dr. Jason Yuan

🧬Maxpein🧬

45,371 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Toby Rogers, PhD gives a 360° explanation for why autism hasn't been studied correctly, as medicine, research, & regulation have all been captured by Big Pharma money. 🔥"Doctors live inside an epistemic bubble engineered by the pharmaceutical industry to increase its profits" Per Children's Health Defense: "Rogers is a fellow with the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research. He has a doctorate in political economy from the University of Sydney in Australia, and a Master of Public Policy from the University of California, Berkeley." ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Let me explain how all this works. This is right in my wheelhouse. This is what I study. I follow the money. Autism is a political economy problem. These are all political economy problems. "Thus far, government has failed in response to the autism epidemic because of regulatory capture. Rather than protecting public health, regulators have advanced the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. That's pretty straightforward. Science and medicine have failed in response to the autism epidemic because of epistemic capture. And what I mean by that is that the pharmaceutical industry has captured every step in the knowledge production process in science and medicine. "Big Pharma controls what is studied, how it is researched, and what qualifies as evidence. Now, this capture permeates every level of the system. Medical textbooks and curricula are influenced by financially conflicted academics. Universities and department chairs hold substantial pharmaceutical ties. "Most clinical trials are conducted by for profit contract research organizations. In China and the third world, a large share of scientific journal articles are ghostwritten. The pharmaceutical industry spends over $27 billion annually on drug promotion and continuing medical education. Standards of care are, authored by conflicted physicians. So from the first day of medical school to the final years of practice, doctors live inside an epistemic bubble engineered by the pharmaceutical industry to increase its profits. "Senator Blumenthal and Dr. Scott only pay attention to captured science. Science that's controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. The correct answers, the best science is happening outside of that epistemic bubble. The entire system of knowledge production in science and medicine needs to be overhauled to liberate it from the biases and distortions imposed by the pharmaceutical industry."

Sense Receptor

110,680 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

John Searle: consciousness cannot be an illusion and here's the argument that makes it undeniable Science has a long track record of overturning our intuitions. The table looks solid, it isn't. The sun appears to set, it doesn't. We've learned to accept that appearances deceive us, and that reality lies beneath. But philosopher John Searle argues there is exactly one domain where this move simply cannot be made: consciousness itself. "Where consciousness is concerned, you can't make the standard appearance/reality distinction that we make for the rest of the world." His logic is simple. When a scientist tells you the table isn't really solid and that it's a cloud of micro-particles, you can accept that. The appearance (solidity) and the reality (particles) are two different things, and you can hold them apart. Same with the sunset. It looks like the sun moves. It doesn't. The rotation of the Earth creates an illusion. Appearance and reality come apart and you understand the gap. Now try applying that same logic to your conscious experience. Someone claims your pain isn't really there, that your awareness is just an illusion. But here, Searle says, the distinction collapses entirely: "Where the existence of consciousness is concerned, the appearance is the reality. There's no way that some guy can come to me and convince me I'm not conscious if I think I'm conscious, I am conscious." This is a structural point about what consciousness fundamentally is. For every other phenomenon, the appearance can be explained away by pointing to what's "really" happening underneath. But consciousness is the very medium in which all appearances occur. There is no "underneath" to retreat to. To say consciousness is an illusion, you would first need to be conscious of the illusion. The argument defeats itself on contact.

Big Brain Philosophy

17,476 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

It is not useful to ask whether AI has consciousness or not. #kenmogi #QualiaRoom episode 127. Summary The speaker addresses the question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) possesses consciousness, firmly stating that current AI, particularly those based on statistical learning models, does not generate consciousness. This stance is based on the speaker’s personal model of consciousness, recognizing that various opinions exist, including some who claim large language models may already be conscious or that embodiment could be crucial for AI consciousness to emerge. The speaker highlights the fundamental challenge in verifying consciousness, noting that even among humans it is impossible to objectively confirm whether another person is conscious. Philosophical thought experiments such as philosophical zombies and inverted qualia illustrate the difficulty but remain unfalsifiable and thus untestable. Consequently, questioning AI consciousness is deemed an intriguing but practically unhelpful inquiry. The speaker suggests that current AI developments demonstrate that many complex computations can be performed without consciousness. Therefore, the primary focus should be on how conscious humans can effectively align with non-conscious AI systems. Understanding the unique computational roles of consciousness might clarify the boundaries of what AI systems can and cannot achieve. This approach offers a meaningful direction for AI alignment and development.

Ken Mogi

16,594 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

You Are Not the Body or the Mind: You Are the Witness of the Three States of Experience All our experience happens in one of three states of experience: the waking state, the dream state, and the deep, dreamless sleep state. In the waking state (which is what you’re in now, as you read this), you are aware of and identify with your body and mind. In the dream state, you lose all awareness of your body and you stop identifying with it, yet you remain aware of and identified with your mind, immersed in the dreams that it creates. In the deep, dreamless sleep state, you lose awareness of both your body and mind, as the mind enters into what in Sanskrit is called laya—a state of dissolution. When you wake, you regain awareness of your body and mind and you take them to be who you are. But this is a mistake. You are neither the body nor the mind—you are the ātmā, the avasthā traya sākṣī. Avasthā traya sākṣī means the witness (sākṣī) of the three states (avasthā traya). It is the unchanging consciousness, that remains constant through all three states as their experiencer. This unchanging consciousness is who you ACTUALLY are. Vedānta teaches that you mistake your body and your mind for who you are because of avidyā. Often translated as “ignorance,” avidyā should not be taken as an insult—avidyā simply means lacking vidyā (knowledge) of your true self as the ātmā, the avasthā traya sākṣī. This avidyā, which we are all born with, is the root cause of the ātmā remaining in saṃsāra (the repeated cycle of birth and death). Yet this avidyā can be dispelled through ātmā-vidyā, the knowledge of the self, which is exactly what Vedānta teaches us to set us free from this cycle.

Coronavirus Plushie

30,116 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr