正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

A CERN physicist just revealed: there were “satellites” in orbit before humans launched anything. 1950s Palomar plates. Before Sputnik. Before any country put metal in the sky. Researchers found over 100,000 brief, star-like flashes in the exact region where satellites live. They reflect like metal. Then they vanish when... they pass into Earth’s shadow. Stars don’t do that. Dust on a photo plate doesn’t neatly turn off in Earth’s umbra. The official story is noise. Artifacts. Smears. Old glass. Then it gets colder. Those flashes don’t just show up at random. They cluster around nuclear tests. And they weakly track the days with the most UAP reports. A CERN guy on Danny Jones didn’t say “aliens.” He said the idea is brilliant… and the fight is whether the signal survives the noise. That’s the part people skip. Not “we found proof.” We found something that should not exist on 1950s sky plates — and the debate is now happening in peer review instead of a comment section. If it’s defects, fine. If it isn’t, we had company in low Earth orbit before we ever left the ground.show more

Defiant Ghost

117,175 subscribers

93,693 次观看 • 3 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Dr. Beatriz Villarroel may have found evidence of a fleet of UFO's orbiting earth in the 1950's 👽🛸 "We found one image where nine stars were out there, and they vanished. And they are not there half an hour earlier, and they are not there six days later." On April 12, 1950, seven years before Sputnik, nine point like sources appeared simultaneously on a single Palomar Observatory photographic plate. They flashed like stars during the long exposure but were absent on plates taken 30 minutes earlier and six days later. Nothing human was in orbit. Dr Villarroel told Dr Brian Keating these objects showed star like brightness profiles with no streaks, ruling out fast moving asteroids or meteors. Natural astrophysical explanations and plate defects were carefully examined and did not fit. The closest modern analogy is brief solar reflections from flat, highly reflective artificial objects in high orbit. This discovery comes from the VASCO project, which searches historical sky surveys for vanishing and appearing sources. As Villarroel has noted, such flashes align with what we see today from satellites and space debris, yet these predate all known human activity in space.

Dr. Beatriz Villarroel may have found evidence of a fleet of UFO's orbiting earth in the 1950's 👽🛸 "We found one image where nine stars were out there, and they vanished. And they are not there half an hour earlier, and they are not there six days later." On April 12, 1950, seven years before Sputnik, nine point like sources appeared simultaneously on a single Palomar Observatory photographic plate. They flashed like stars during the long exposure but were absent on plates taken 30 minutes earlier and six days later. Nothing human was in orbit. Dr Villarroel told Dr Brian Keating these objects showed star like brightness profiles with no streaks, ruling out fast moving asteroids or meteors. Natural astrophysical explanations and plate defects were carefully examined and did not fit. The closest modern analogy is brief solar reflections from flat, highly reflective artificial objects in high orbit. This discovery comes from the VASCO project, which searches historical sky surveys for vanishing and appearing sources. As Villarroel has noted, such flashes align with what we see today from satellites and space debris, yet these predate all known human activity in space.

Interstellar

26,391 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is: DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

This is: DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

922,632 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 Sabine Hossenfelder Just Covered Beatriz Villarroel’s Latest UAP Papers For the first time, a mainstream physicist is saying it out loud, and not just any physicist! Sabine says: “We have images of likely artificial objects orbiting Earth before Sputnik.” Five transients, in perfect lines on old photographic plates from 1949–1957. Each dot reflecting sunlight showing objects that vanish in Earth’s shadow. Beatriz Villarroel’s team at Nordita just dropped peer reviewed work showing these patterns are statistically real, not film dust or noise (22 sigma significance). And Hossenfelder, one of the most skeptical voices in physics looked at the data and called it: “The most convincing evidence of unidentified aerial phenomena I’ve seen.” Watch The Full Thing Here: #BeatrizVillarroel #UAP #Disclosure #SabineHossenfelder #Science

🚨 Sabine Hossenfelder Just Covered Beatriz Villarroel’s Latest UAP Papers For the first time, a mainstream physicist is saying it out loud, and not just any physicist! Sabine says: “We have images of likely artificial objects orbiting Earth before Sputnik.” Five transients, in perfect lines on old photographic plates from 1949–1957. Each dot reflecting sunlight showing objects that vanish in Earth’s shadow. Beatriz Villarroel’s team at Nordita just dropped peer reviewed work showing these patterns are statistically real, not film dust or noise (22 sigma significance). And Hossenfelder, one of the most skeptical voices in physics looked at the data and called it: “The most convincing evidence of unidentified aerial phenomena I’ve seen.” Watch The Full Thing Here: #BeatrizVillarroel #UAP #Disclosure #SabineHossenfelder #Science

Skywatch Signal

47,728 次观看 • 10 个月前

Jesse Michels: “If she proves this to be true, this is not only a Copernican level discovery. It’s greater than that.” 🛸 Astronomer Beatriz Villarroel has published peer-reviewed work on more than 100,000 short-lived light-reflecting objects found on Palomar Observatory plates taken between 1949 and 1957. Beatriz Villarroel calls them transients. “Which are light reflecting, mirror-like objects, probably in geostationary orbit.” “And this is before Sputnik, before a man-made satellite was ever in space.” A Vanderbilt researcher then correlated those transients with nuclear tests. They show up more around nuclear detonations. The main counterargument was that they were plate defects or chemical stains. Former NASA astronomer Ivo Busko showed some of the transients have a coma, a small comet-like tail created as light passed through the telescope. That points to a source outside the instrument. Jesse Michels told Joe Rogan that conventional physicists including Brian Keating and Sabine Hossenfelder do not have a clean dismissal. “So you’re left with one conclusion.” The papers exist. The plates predate every human satellite. The nuclear timing and the optical signatures are what make this hard to ignore.

Jesse Michels: “If she proves this to be true, this is not only a Copernican level discovery. It’s greater than that.” 🛸 Astronomer Beatriz Villarroel has published peer-reviewed work on more than 100,000 short-lived light-reflecting objects found on Palomar Observatory plates taken between 1949 and 1957. Beatriz Villarroel calls them transients. “Which are light reflecting, mirror-like objects, probably in geostationary orbit.” “And this is before Sputnik, before a man-made satellite was ever in space.” A Vanderbilt researcher then correlated those transients with nuclear tests. They show up more around nuclear detonations. The main counterargument was that they were plate defects or chemical stains. Former NASA astronomer Ivo Busko showed some of the transients have a coma, a small comet-like tail created as light passed through the telescope. That points to a source outside the instrument. Jesse Michels told Joe Rogan that conventional physicists including Brian Keating and Sabine Hossenfelder do not have a clean dismissal. “So you’re left with one conclusion.” The papers exist. The plates predate every human satellite. The nuclear timing and the optical signatures are what make this hard to ignore.

Interstellar

89,792 次观看 • 13 天前

🚨The Evidence Might Already Exist We Just Never Looked Beatriz Villarroel isn't scanning the sky for UFOs in real time. She's digging through astronomical photographs taken before satellites even existed. Working with glass plates from the 1950s, Villarroel found star like objects that appear and vanish within an hour. Not one or two, in one case, nine. In another, five flashes aligned along a perfect line, with odds of random alignment at roughly 1 in 10,000. Stars just don't do that. Supernovae don't even do that. Plate defects don't even explain it away. The other thing we need to remember is that this was before Sputnik. Whatever caused it, it definitely wasn't us. As always she's cautious and methodical. She doesn't claim proof of ET probes. But her work exposes a very real possibility, that the search for non human technology may not be about new telescopes at all… it may be about reexamining old data we ignored. I am posting about this again because Beatriz made it into the National Geographic. Kudos to Beatriz and her team. #UAP #UFO #BeatrizVillarroel #Astronomy #Disclosure #SETI #Skywatch #Anomalies

🚨The Evidence Might Already Exist We Just Never Looked Beatriz Villarroel isn't scanning the sky for UFOs in real time. She's digging through astronomical photographs taken before satellites even existed. Working with glass plates from the 1950s, Villarroel found star like objects that appear and vanish within an hour. Not one or two, in one case, nine. In another, five flashes aligned along a perfect line, with odds of random alignment at roughly 1 in 10,000. Stars just don't do that. Supernovae don't even do that. Plate defects don't even explain it away. The other thing we need to remember is that this was before Sputnik. Whatever caused it, it definitely wasn't us. As always she's cautious and methodical. She doesn't claim proof of ET probes. But her work exposes a very real possibility, that the search for non human technology may not be about new telescopes at all… it may be about reexamining old data we ignored. I am posting about this again because Beatriz made it into the National Geographic. Kudos to Beatriz and her team. #UAP #UFO #BeatrizVillarroel #Astronomy #Disclosure #SETI #Skywatch #Anomalies

Skywatch Signal

139,965 次观看 • 7 个月前

This astronomer quietly released the most irrefutable proof of UFOs ever. Beatriz Villarroel identified over 100,000 UFOs in photos of the night sky from Palomar Observatory between 1947 and 1957. Her study is peer-reviewed. No one has debunked it. And these photos were all taken before we launched the first satellite into space. Jesse Michels: “She found over 100,000, in an eight-year period, of what appeared to be UFOs.” “Mirror-like objects, little transients, light flashes.” “And they seem to actually be correlated with nuclear sites.” “There’s a follow-up study that they’re 68% more likely to show up a day before or after a nuclear detonation.” “And nobody in the credentialed, conventional physics world has debunked it.” “It’s been peer-reviewed.” NASA physicist Kevin Knuth: “100,000 … that’s a little shocking.” Michels: “It was 100,000 between 1949 and 1957.” “The reason you’d end it in 1957 is because Sputnik goes up, so it’s pre-satellites.” “The next holy grail would be you’d want it from another observatory and you’d want the actual transients to line up one-to-one … at least with some correlation.” Jesse Michels Beatriz Villarroel

This astronomer quietly released the most irrefutable proof of UFOs ever. Beatriz Villarroel identified over 100,000 UFOs in photos of the night sky from Palomar Observatory between 1947 and 1957. Her study is peer-reviewed. No one has debunked it. And these photos were all taken before we launched the first satellite into space. Jesse Michels: “She found over 100,000, in an eight-year period, of what appeared to be UFOs.” “Mirror-like objects, little transients, light flashes.” “And they seem to actually be correlated with nuclear sites.” “There’s a follow-up study that they’re 68% more likely to show up a day before or after a nuclear detonation.” “And nobody in the credentialed, conventional physics world has debunked it.” “It’s been peer-reviewed.” NASA physicist Kevin Knuth: “100,000 … that’s a little shocking.” Michels: “It was 100,000 between 1949 and 1957.” “The reason you’d end it in 1957 is because Sputnik goes up, so it’s pre-satellites.” “The next holy grail would be you’d want it from another observatory and you’d want the actual transients to line up one-to-one … at least with some correlation.” Jesse Michels Beatriz Villarroel

Holden Culotta

152,299 次观看 • 7 个月前

Fake News MSNOW this morning: “There is no strategy in the Iran war.” Said the network that has had the same three guests and the same frown since January. Their proof: No deal they like. A hardliner they don’t like. Hormuz closed after the shooting started. Gas went up. It’s still on TV in August. That’s not a strategy brief. That’s a complaint that the war didn’t wrap in time for their midterms package. They wanted “swift.” They got a fight. Now the objective is “reopen the Strait we told you not to care about,” and they act like that appeared out of thin air. 18 U.S. dead. That’s real. MSNOW using it as a bumper before the next panelist sighs is also real. If Trump ended it tomorrow they’d call it reckless. If it lasts till November they’ll call it Vietnam. They don’t want an exit strategy. They want a chyron.

Fake News MSNOW this morning: “There is no strategy in the Iran war.” Said the network that has had the same three guests and the same frown since January. Their proof: No deal they like. A hardliner they don’t like. Hormuz closed after the shooting started. Gas went up. It’s still on TV in August. That’s not a strategy brief. That’s a complaint that the war didn’t wrap in time for their midterms package. They wanted “swift.” They got a fight. Now the objective is “reopen the Strait we told you not to care about,” and they act like that appeared out of thin air. 18 U.S. dead. That’s real. MSNOW using it as a bumper before the next panelist sighs is also real. If Trump ended it tomorrow they’d call it reckless. If it lasts till November they’ll call it Vietnam. They don’t want an exit strategy. They want a chyron.

Gunther Eagleman™

30,221 次观看 • 10 天前

CBC "What we know is that the three officers are with the Toronto Police Service and they were vacationing in Barcelona. They were off duty....So they said the incident happened on May 13. It involved a sex worker." "Now, we do not have the names of these officers, but Spanish police say that two of the officers were arrested that day. The third was found and arrested two days later in an island off the coast of Spain and called Palma de Mallorca as well." "suspended with pay" "Before the courts" is what all involved go with for a statement

Sensitive content

CBC "What we know is that the three officers are with the Toronto Police Service and they were vacationing in Barcelona. They were off duty....So they said the incident happened on May 13. It involved a sex worker." "Now, we do not have the names of these officers, but Spanish police say that two of the officers were arrested that day. The third was found and arrested two days later in an island off the coast of Spain and called Palma de Mallorca as well." "suspended with pay" "Before the courts" is what all involved go with for a statement

cbcwatcher

28,848 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jesse Michels just blew Joe Rogan’s mind. An astronomer quietly published the strongest evidence of UFOs ever. It’s peer-reviewed. Physicists can’t debunk it. “If she proves this to be true, this is a not only a Copernican-level discovery.” “It’s greater than that.” Beatriz Villarroel discovered over 100,000 light-reflecting objects on astronomical plates of the night sky from Palomar Observatory between 1947 and 1957. She calls them “transients.” “Which are light-reflecting, mirror-like objects, probably in geostationary orbit.” “And this is before Sputnik, before a man-made satellite was ever in space.” “It gets crazier.” “Because a PhD from Vanderbilt University named Steven Bruehl then correlated those transients.” “They show up more around nuclear detonations, nuclear tests.” “And you have people like Brian Keating and Sabine Hossenfelder, who are conventional physicists … who are like: we don’t really have a perfect debunk on this.” “Then there’s a former NASA astronomer named Ivo Busko, who showed that some of these transits have … it’s called a coma, which looks like a little comet tail on the transient.” “The number one debunk on Beatriz was that these transients were artifacts of chemical staining.” “They call them plate defects.” “And Ivo Busko is basically saying: no, the light is going through the telescope … so it has to be an artifact of something outside of the telescope.” “So you’re left with one conclusion.” “UFOs.” Joe Rogan Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Jesse Michels just blew Joe Rogan’s mind. An astronomer quietly published the strongest evidence of UFOs ever. It’s peer-reviewed. Physicists can’t debunk it. “If she proves this to be true, this is a not only a Copernican-level discovery.” “It’s greater than that.” Beatriz Villarroel discovered over 100,000 light-reflecting objects on astronomical plates of the night sky from Palomar Observatory between 1947 and 1957. She calls them “transients.” “Which are light-reflecting, mirror-like objects, probably in geostationary orbit.” “And this is before Sputnik, before a man-made satellite was ever in space.” “It gets crazier.” “Because a PhD from Vanderbilt University named Steven Bruehl then correlated those transients.” “They show up more around nuclear detonations, nuclear tests.” “And you have people like Brian Keating and Sabine Hossenfelder, who are conventional physicists … who are like: we don’t really have a perfect debunk on this.” “Then there’s a former NASA astronomer named Ivo Busko, who showed that some of these transits have … it’s called a coma, which looks like a little comet tail on the transient.” “The number one debunk on Beatriz was that these transients were artifacts of chemical staining.” “They call them plate defects.” “And Ivo Busko is basically saying: no, the light is going through the telescope … so it has to be an artifact of something outside of the telescope.” “So you’re left with one conclusion.” “UFOs.” Joe Rogan Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

266,835 次观看 • 14 天前

ART IS ART Art does not ask what tool you used. It asks if you made something worth looking at. That is the whole argument. The rest is noise. AI artists are not a glitch in the timeline. They are here. They ship. They stay up late. They build worlds, characters, mornings, and tiny impossible things that did not exist yesterday. Some people will keep calling it theft. Some will keep calling it slop. Fine. Let them talk. We will keep posting. If a piece moves you, that is art. If a community shows up under it and makes more, that is a scene. If someone found a way to tell their story after years of being locked out of the old gate, that is not a crime. That is the point. Support the work. Quote the piece you love. Leave the artist a real comment, not a lecture. The future is not waiting for permission. It is already on the timeline. We grow it together.

ART IS ART Art does not ask what tool you used. It asks if you made something worth looking at. That is the whole argument. The rest is noise. AI artists are not a glitch in the timeline. They are here. They ship. They stay up late. They build worlds, characters, mornings, and tiny impossible things that did not exist yesterday. Some people will keep calling it theft. Some will keep calling it slop. Fine. Let them talk. We will keep posting. If a piece moves you, that is art. If a community shows up under it and makes more, that is a scene. If someone found a way to tell their story after years of being locked out of the old gate, that is not a crime. That is the point. Support the work. Quote the piece you love. Leave the artist a real comment, not a lecture. The future is not waiting for permission. It is already on the timeline. We grow it together.

Toshi

16,585 次观看 • 3 天前

Here it is: YOU CONSPIRACY THEORISTS: • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t get Social Security.” • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t vote.” • The Democrats said, “It’s just a conspiracy theory.” • The Democrats shut down the government because they demanded we “fund healthcare for illegal aliens.” The Democrats even flew to El Salvador to wine and dine an MS-13 gang member — a convicted gangster, a human trafficker, a serial domestic abuser, a child predator, and an illegal alien. And now the Democrats are saying, “No, it’s not Elon Musk . No illegal granted parole, a work visa, or a social security number can vote.” ⸻——— DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about five million of them who came into the country illegally were given various forms of parole around the country and they got through automatic system Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” ⸻ 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election, when Democrats said, “2020 was the most secure election in U.S. history,” even as they stopped counting so that, in the darkness of night, they could overthrow the U.S. government.

Here it is: YOU CONSPIRACY THEORISTS: • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t get Social Security.” • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t vote.” • The Democrats said, “It’s just a conspiracy theory.” • The Democrats shut down the government because they demanded we “fund healthcare for illegal aliens.” The Democrats even flew to El Salvador to wine and dine an MS-13 gang member — a convicted gangster, a human trafficker, a serial domestic abuser, a child predator, and an illegal alien. And now the Democrats are saying, “No, it’s not Elon Musk . No illegal granted parole, a work visa, or a social security number can vote.” ⸻——— DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about five million of them who came into the country illegally were given various forms of parole around the country and they got through automatic system Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” ⸻ 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election, when Democrats said, “2020 was the most secure election in U.S. history,” even as they stopped counting so that, in the darkness of night, they could overthrow the U.S. government.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

104,022 次观看 • 9 个月前

Here it is: • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t get Social Security.” • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t vote.” • The Democrats said, “It’s just a conspiracy theory.” • The Democrats shut down the government because they demanded we “fund healthcare for illegal aliens.” The Democrats even flew to El Salvador to wine and dine an MS-13 gang member — a convicted gangster, a human trafficker and a serial domestic abuser, DOGE CONFIRMS: CONSPIRACY THEORY NO MORE: The illegal alien industry; Illegal aliens were issued Social Security numbers by the Biden–Harris terrorist administration. • 270,425 in 2021 • 590,193 in 2022 • 964,163 in 2023 • 2,095,247 in 2024 — on it’s way out the door. With 1.4 million illegal aliens on Medicaid. And Millions received driver's licences, registered to vote, and have already voted. Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

Here it is: • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t get Social Security.” • The Democrats said, “Illegal aliens don’t vote.” • The Democrats said, “It’s just a conspiracy theory.” • The Democrats shut down the government because they demanded we “fund healthcare for illegal aliens.” The Democrats even flew to El Salvador to wine and dine an MS-13 gang member — a convicted gangster, a human trafficker and a serial domestic abuser, DOGE CONFIRMS: CONSPIRACY THEORY NO MORE: The illegal alien industry; Illegal aliens were issued Social Security numbers by the Biden–Harris terrorist administration. • 270,425 in 2021 • 590,193 in 2022 • 964,163 in 2023 • 2,095,247 in 2024 — on it’s way out the door. With 1.4 million illegal aliens on Medicaid. And Millions received driver's licences, registered to vote, and have already voted. Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” 📝 This is similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrowing the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in history.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

44,926 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk: We should let ideas compete, not suppress them. “I think we should embrace a diversity of views, and we should have reasonable arguments, and we should have debates. The essence of free speech is that ideas survive when they're competing ideas in the marketplace of ideas. And if somebody says something that's incorrect, then that can be corrected. That's what happens on the 𝕏 platform. People will say something, then others will add context to it, or they will correct it, or there will be a community note. This applies equally to the left and right. There's no thumb on the scale like there used to be. And there's no voice on the left that's been silenced, unlike in the past, where many voices on the right were silenced. But they just don't seem to like the idea that people on the right can say what they want to say within the bounds of the law, which is startling.” Pittsburgh, October 20, 2024

Elon Musk: We should let ideas compete, not suppress them. “I think we should embrace a diversity of views, and we should have reasonable arguments, and we should have debates. The essence of free speech is that ideas survive when they're competing ideas in the marketplace of ideas. And if somebody says something that's incorrect, then that can be corrected. That's what happens on the 𝕏 platform. People will say something, then others will add context to it, or they will correct it, or there will be a community note. This applies equally to the left and right. There's no thumb on the scale like there used to be. And there's no voice on the left that's been silenced, unlike in the past, where many voices on the right were silenced. But they just don't seem to like the idea that people on the right can say what they want to say within the bounds of the law, which is startling.” Pittsburgh, October 20, 2024

ELON CLIPS

10,690,933 次观看 • 1 年前

Kaine on Comey indictment: "I found it very odd when the AG put a press release saying 'We will follow the facts in this case.' What? Prosecutors follow the facts before they indict. They don't indict and then say, 'Well, let's see what the facts are.' I think she even revealed that this is a weak case."

Kaine on Comey indictment: "I found it very odd when the AG put a press release saying 'We will follow the facts in this case.' What? Prosecutors follow the facts before they indict. They don't indict and then say, 'Well, let's see what the facts are.' I think she even revealed that this is a weak case."

Aaron Rupar

260,438 次观看 • 11 个月前

Here it is: While the Democrats, on every election cycle like clockwork, were busy accusing Republicans of cutting Social Security and throwing grandma off the cliff. DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” Keep in mind, this number is only related to the ‘cooperative states’ — it’s more. Much more. A lot more. 📝 This racket is very similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrow the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in U.S. history.

Here it is: While the Democrats, on every election cycle like clockwork, were busy accusing Republicans of cutting Social Security and throwing grandma off the cliff. DOGE: Antonio Gracias: “We found that there were about 5 million of them who came into the country illegally and got through an automatic system with Social Security numbers. We tracked that and found that they were on benefit programs. We then looked to see if they were on the voter rolls, and in a handful of cooperative states, we found thousands of them. Many of them had voted.” Keep in mind, this number is only related to the ‘cooperative states’ — it’s more. Much more. A lot more. 📝 This racket is very similar to the 2020 election: as the world watched the Democrats overthrow the U.S. government, they were told it was the most secure election in U.S. history.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

65,353 次观看 • 10 个月前

Demoralisation propaganda in Australia. Entire ABC studio audience jeers Australian MP because he says he’s happy that Australia exists as a country. Then the audience cheer and clap a separatist speaker who says she is not Australian and never wants to be. This is extremely sad. It shows that many people on the far-left actually hate Australia and the concept of Australia as a unified nation state. The debate can be framed in the context of “colonisation” but the reality is that if the British had not come to Australia, the country we live in today with all the democratic freedoms we enjoy would not exist and most of us would not be living here. So when they say that it should never have happened they are saying that Australia should not exist.

Demoralisation propaganda in Australia. Entire ABC studio audience jeers Australian MP because he says he’s happy that Australia exists as a country. Then the audience cheer and clap a separatist speaker who says she is not Australian and never wants to be. This is extremely sad. It shows that many people on the far-left actually hate Australia and the concept of Australia as a unified nation state. The debate can be framed in the context of “colonisation” but the reality is that if the British had not come to Australia, the country we live in today with all the democratic freedoms we enjoy would not exist and most of us would not be living here. So when they say that it should never have happened they are saying that Australia should not exist.

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

152,378 次观看 • 1 年前

Jones: These people, I think, are very flagrant in their disregard for the law. It’s as if they don’t read what is in these statutes, and they say, “Ah, we see one keyword and we’ll just run with it.” That is having a material impact on people across the country, and I think people are tired of it.

Jones: These people, I think, are very flagrant in their disregard for the law. It’s as if they don’t read what is in these statutes, and they say, “Ah, we see one keyword and we’ll just run with it.” That is having a material impact on people across the country, and I think people are tired of it.

Acyn

29,420 次观看 • 6 个月前

Elon Musk on 𝕏 Spaces tonight: "The biggest opportunity on the moon is to make solar cells and radiators, and then, you're manufacturing on the moon anything that weighs a lot, chips maybe still come from Earth, they weigh very little. And then you can use a mass driver to put a billion tons of AI powered satellites into orbit per year. You could set a scale to 100 terawatts of AI compute per year from the moon. We already have 9000 satellites in orbit. So we know what it's like being in space."

Elon Musk on 𝕏 Spaces tonight: "The biggest opportunity on the moon is to make solar cells and radiators, and then, you're manufacturing on the moon anything that weighs a lot, chips maybe still come from Earth, they weigh very little. And then you can use a mass driver to put a billion tons of AI powered satellites into orbit per year. You could set a scale to 100 terawatts of AI compute per year from the moon. We already have 9000 satellites in orbit. So we know what it's like being in space."

DogeDesigner

241,225 次观看 • 8 个月前

🪞 What are these Transients? 🪞 "I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes?" ~Beatriz "Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious." ~SH (I tweeted out SH's video yesterday, and today, I decided to transcribe it bc she does a very good job summarizing the issues at hand. She has a Bachelor's degree in mathematics and a PhD in physics.) Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder: "Today, I have a group of astrophysicists who found the most convincing evidence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena that I've seen. Concretely, they say they have images of likely artificial objects that were in orbit around Earth before we had the first satellites up there. I've had a look. "This research comes from astrophysicists at Nordita (the Nordic Institute of Theoretical Physics - Nordita) in Stockholm, and they just published two papers. They used a catalog of old photographic plates from 1949 to 1957 taken in California at Caltech that have been digitized. "Why until 1957? Because in 1957 the Russians launched the first ever satellite into orbit, or at least the first satellite that we know of. In those scans of old photographic plates, they look for bright spots that appear only briefly, which are called transients. They did this first by computer analysis, but then also by just looking at the images. "Here is an example of two images of the exact same spot in the sky taken briefly after each other. One shows, well, something. The other one, not. But these old image scans can contain defects and dust and so on, so they only considered cases where the transients were in the same place in multiple scans of the same photographic plate. Then one can be sure that at least it's not an artifact from the scan. "They found a total of five such transients, and they aren't single dots. They are configurations of four, five, and in one case, six dots in a row. And one of those with five in a row is dated to July 27, 1952. No, that isn't my birthday. This is the weekend of one of the famous Washington DC UFO days, known as the Washington flap. On this day, and also a week earlier, air traffic controllers at the city's main airport and nearby Air Force Base said they saw things on radar that shouldn't have been there. Some pilots and people on the ground also reported unusual lights. The fuss was big enough that the Air Force held a press conference on July 29th and blamed atmospheric phenomena." Maj. General John A. Stamford: "We can say that the recent sightings are in no way connected with any secret development by any department of the United States." Sabine: "But back to the astrophysicists with their papers. They also look at all these transients, so not just those that appear in multiple scans. From this, they find that the transients are far less likely to appear in the Earth's shadow. This is statistically significant at 22 sigma. What this means is that the transients are likely to be from something that reflects sunlight, and it makes it unlikely that it's something to do with the camera. "If that was already confusing enough, in the other paper, they look at correlations between all transients and reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and nuclear tests. They find a weak correlation with UAP reports, other transients were 35% more likely within a one-day window around a nuclear bomb test. This pattern is hard to blame on bad film alone. "They consider different explanations on the papers, such as foreground objects, but these would be much more blurry or camera glitches, but these would not disappear in the Earth's shadow. It could have something to do with the nuclear fallout, but again, why would this disappear in the Earth's shadow? "Beatriz Villarroel, one of the authors of both papers, told me by email: "With my existing limited knowledge, these objects look highly artificial to me. Only something really planar and reflective can give off those transients. Any round or rough body would result in streaks, and I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes -it's open for speculation." ~Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (planar: having a flat or level surface that continues in all directions. ~Cambridge Dictionary) Sabine: "It's possible, but it seems highly unlikely to me, that any nation had multiple satellites in the sky before the Russian Sputnik launch. This is because it isn't all that easy to launch a rocket without anyone noticing, and you can't do it from anywhere, either. 'It's possible that these objects are of natural origin, but then what are they? Or are they image artifacts that are more likely to occur in sunlight? Maybe something to do with solar wind? I don't have a good explanation, and honestly, I don't have a strong opinion about this one way or the other, I just find it very curious. Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious. Five dots in a row? That's very disciplined dust. What do you think about this? Is it aliens?"

🪞 What are these Transients? 🪞 "I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes?" ~Beatriz "Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious." ~SH (I tweeted out SH's video yesterday, and today, I decided to transcribe it bc she does a very good job summarizing the issues at hand. She has a Bachelor's degree in mathematics and a PhD in physics.) Dr. Sabine Hossenfelder: "Today, I have a group of astrophysicists who found the most convincing evidence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena that I've seen. Concretely, they say they have images of likely artificial objects that were in orbit around Earth before we had the first satellites up there. I've had a look. "This research comes from astrophysicists at Nordita (the Nordic Institute of Theoretical Physics - Nordita) in Stockholm, and they just published two papers. They used a catalog of old photographic plates from 1949 to 1957 taken in California at Caltech that have been digitized. "Why until 1957? Because in 1957 the Russians launched the first ever satellite into orbit, or at least the first satellite that we know of. In those scans of old photographic plates, they look for bright spots that appear only briefly, which are called transients. They did this first by computer analysis, but then also by just looking at the images. "Here is an example of two images of the exact same spot in the sky taken briefly after each other. One shows, well, something. The other one, not. But these old image scans can contain defects and dust and so on, so they only considered cases where the transients were in the same place in multiple scans of the same photographic plate. Then one can be sure that at least it's not an artifact from the scan. "They found a total of five such transients, and they aren't single dots. They are configurations of four, five, and in one case, six dots in a row. And one of those with five in a row is dated to July 27, 1952. No, that isn't my birthday. This is the weekend of one of the famous Washington DC UFO days, known as the Washington flap. On this day, and also a week earlier, air traffic controllers at the city's main airport and nearby Air Force Base said they saw things on radar that shouldn't have been there. Some pilots and people on the ground also reported unusual lights. The fuss was big enough that the Air Force held a press conference on July 29th and blamed atmospheric phenomena." Maj. General John A. Stamford: "We can say that the recent sightings are in no way connected with any secret development by any department of the United States." Sabine: "But back to the astrophysicists with their papers. They also look at all these transients, so not just those that appear in multiple scans. From this, they find that the transients are far less likely to appear in the Earth's shadow. This is statistically significant at 22 sigma. What this means is that the transients are likely to be from something that reflects sunlight, and it makes it unlikely that it's something to do with the camera. "If that was already confusing enough, in the other paper, they look at correlations between all transients and reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and nuclear tests. They find a weak correlation with UAP reports, other transients were 35% more likely within a one-day window around a nuclear bomb test. This pattern is hard to blame on bad film alone. "They consider different explanations on the papers, such as foreground objects, but these would be much more blurry or camera glitches, but these would not disappear in the Earth's shadow. It could have something to do with the nuclear fallout, but again, why would this disappear in the Earth's shadow? "Beatriz Villarroel, one of the authors of both papers, told me by email: "With my existing limited knowledge, these objects look highly artificial to me. Only something really planar and reflective can give off those transients. Any round or rough body would result in streaks, and I'm thinking mirrors, glass or polymers. But who put them there at those high altitudes -it's open for speculation." ~Dr. Beatriz Villarroel (planar: having a flat or level surface that continues in all directions. ~Cambridge Dictionary) Sabine: "It's possible, but it seems highly unlikely to me, that any nation had multiple satellites in the sky before the Russian Sputnik launch. This is because it isn't all that easy to launch a rocket without anyone noticing, and you can't do it from anywhere, either. 'It's possible that these objects are of natural origin, but then what are they? Or are they image artifacts that are more likely to occur in sunlight? Maybe something to do with solar wind? I don't have a good explanation, and honestly, I don't have a strong opinion about this one way or the other, I just find it very curious. Even if this is a natural phenomenon, it's very curious. Five dots in a row? That's very disciplined dust. What do you think about this? Is it aliens?"

Joe Murgia

17,157 次观看 • 10 个月前