正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

A chilling warning from Dr. William Makis that demands your attention. He reveals a critical and unaddressed danger: the mRNA vaccine platform, as confirmed by the CEOs of Pfizer and Moderna, is being locked in as the permanent model for all future products. The same lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

462,629 subscribers

155,431 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Unchecked Crisis: As "Turbo Cancers" Rise, A Doctor Asks Why The Architects of The Vaccine Rollout Were Promoted, Not Held Accountable A chilling assertion from Dr. William Makis: We are living in a state of chaos born from a total absence of justice and accountability for COVID-19 vaccine policy. In a powerful statement, the doctor highlights that not a single bureaucrat or politician has faced consequences. Instead, he points to a disturbing trend in Canada where the "biggest jab pushers have been rewarded with promotions." He cites a specific example: The current President of the Canadian Medical Association, who previously led Manitoba's vaccine rollout. Under her watch, Makis claims, massage therapists were recruited to vaccinate young people without informed consent—a practice he describes as ethically bankrupt. Yet, her career trajectory soared. This lack of accountability, he argues, is unfolding as more damning evidence about vaccine injury emerges. While the term "turbo cancer" is dismissed by some for being a layperson's term, Makis insists the scientific literature is catching up. His challenge? Search "cancer and mRNA" or "cancer and Pfizer" in published papers. You will now find over 100 studies, including numerous case reports linking the Pfizer vaccine to rapid-onset lymphomas. The mechanism? Makis, who co-authored a paper on the subject, points to the IgG4 antibody shift—an immune system change post-third dose that may cause the body to not only tolerate the spike protein but also to ignore cancerous cells. The central, terrifying question remains: Why are the individuals who orchestrated these policies being honored, while the public is left to grapple with the potential consequences alone?
2:21

The Unchecked Crisis: As "Turbo Cancers" Rise, A Doctor Asks Why The Architects of The Vaccine Rollout Were Promoted, Not Held Accountable A chilling assertion from Dr. William Makis: We are living in a state of chaos born from a total absence of justice and accountability for COVID-19 vaccine policy. In a powerful statement, the doctor highlights that not a single bureaucrat or politician has faced consequences. Instead, he points to a disturbing trend in Canada where the "biggest jab pushers have been rewarded with promotions." He cites a specific example: The current President of the Canadian Medical Association, who previously led Manitoba's vaccine rollout. Under her watch, Makis claims, massage therapists were recruited to vaccinate young people without informed consent—a practice he describes as ethically bankrupt. Yet, her career trajectory soared. This lack of accountability, he argues, is unfolding as more damning evidence about vaccine injury emerges. While the term "turbo cancer" is dismissed by some for being a layperson's term, Makis insists the scientific literature is catching up. His challenge? Search "cancer and mRNA" or "cancer and Pfizer" in published papers. You will now find over 100 studies, including numerous case reports linking the Pfizer vaccine to rapid-onset lymphomas. The mechanism? Makis, who co-authored a paper on the subject, points to the IgG4 antibody shift—an immune system change post-third dose that may cause the body to not only tolerate the spike protein but also to ignore cancerous cells. The central, terrifying question remains: Why are the individuals who orchestrated these policies being honored, while the public is left to grapple with the potential consequences alone?

Camus

15,606 次观看 • 10 个月前

🔥🔥"The entire mRNA lipid-nanoparticle platform is a disaster... It's really biological warfare on all of us."🔥🔥 Radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis (MakisMD) describes for Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) why he thinks "the entire [mRNA] platform has to be halted... and... banned." "The entire mRNA lipid-nanoparticle platform is a disaster... It's really biological warfare on all of us," Makis tells Joy. He adds, "The entire platform has to be halted... and it has to be banned." Makis notes, "It's not just the 500 mRNA vaccines that are in the pipeline, they're [the pharmaceutical companies] playing around with the next generation of this technology—they're talking about putting CRISPR technology into these lipid nanoparticles and doing all kinds of gene editing and so on." Furthermore, the oncologist and cancer researcher says that he believes that "the COVID vaccine really opened the door to these genetic-manipulation and genetic technologies that they wanted to roll out in big populations, but they could never get... approved." Makis adds, "If you came up to a population [prior to 2020] and said, 'Do you guys want to take a gene therapy product?' Everyone would've said 'Absolutely not.' Like, 'You're insane, I don't want my DNA messed with. And yet they've been able to do it through the COVID vaccine—they've been able to open the door, and now they're talking about all kinds of other variations, [including] the next generation of mRNA vaccines [that use 'self-amplifying' technology]."
1:15

🔥🔥"The entire mRNA lipid-nanoparticle platform is a disaster... It's really biological warfare on all of us."🔥🔥 Radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis (MakisMD) describes for Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) why he thinks "the entire [mRNA] platform has to be halted... and... banned." "The entire mRNA lipid-nanoparticle platform is a disaster... It's really biological warfare on all of us," Makis tells Joy. He adds, "The entire platform has to be halted... and it has to be banned." Makis notes, "It's not just the 500 mRNA vaccines that are in the pipeline, they're [the pharmaceutical companies] playing around with the next generation of this technology—they're talking about putting CRISPR technology into these lipid nanoparticles and doing all kinds of gene editing and so on." Furthermore, the oncologist and cancer researcher says that he believes that "the COVID vaccine really opened the door to these genetic-manipulation and genetic technologies that they wanted to roll out in big populations, but they could never get... approved." Makis adds, "If you came up to a population [prior to 2020] and said, 'Do you guys want to take a gene therapy product?' Everyone would've said 'Absolutely not.' Like, 'You're insane, I don't want my DNA messed with. And yet they've been able to do it through the COVID vaccine—they've been able to open the door, and now they're talking about all kinds of other variations, [including] the next generation of mRNA vaccines [that use 'self-amplifying' technology]."

Sense Receptor

45,425 次观看 • 2 年前

California is not a “model for the nation,” as Newsom insists. Its out-of-control cost of living is a warning to the nation.
0:41

California is not a “model for the nation,” as Newsom insists. Its out-of-control cost of living is a warning to the nation.

Kevin Kiley

11,018 次观看 • 6 个月前

A devastating multi-pronged attack on humanity by COVID vaccines has been documented, targeting every age group with catastrophic results. Dr. William Makis lays out the chilling evidence. - On the young: In 2021, 99% of North American universities enforced COVID vaccine mandates, coercing young students of childbearing age under threat of expulsion. The result? A dramatic cliff-fall in birth rates and soaring infertility. This was a deliberate targeting of our future. - On working-age adults: The mandates extended to the workplace, leading to a silent epidemic of disability. As revealed by Ed Dowd's analysis of insurance data, there are over 4 million excess disabilities among working-age Americans. These individuals are now permanently disabled, unable to work, their lives tragically shortened. - On the elderly: The relentless push for boosters on the most vulnerable has resulted in a stark spike in deaths. The elderly population is effectively being wiped out by shots that continue to be approved for their age group. This is not a coincidence; it is a pattern. From the unprecedented deaths of young medical students to millions disabled and a fertility crisis, the evidence points to a single, catastrophic common factor. The human cost is immeasurable, and the need for accountability is urgent.
2:55

A devastating multi-pronged attack on humanity by COVID vaccines has been documented, targeting every age group with catastrophic results. Dr. William Makis lays out the chilling evidence. - On the young: In 2021, 99% of North American universities enforced COVID vaccine mandates, coercing young students of childbearing age under threat of expulsion. The result? A dramatic cliff-fall in birth rates and soaring infertility. This was a deliberate targeting of our future. - On working-age adults: The mandates extended to the workplace, leading to a silent epidemic of disability. As revealed by Ed Dowd's analysis of insurance data, there are over 4 million excess disabilities among working-age Americans. These individuals are now permanently disabled, unable to work, their lives tragically shortened. - On the elderly: The relentless push for boosters on the most vulnerable has resulted in a stark spike in deaths. The elderly population is effectively being wiped out by shots that continue to be approved for their age group. This is not a coincidence; it is a pattern. From the unprecedented deaths of young medical students to millions disabled and a fertility crisis, the evidence points to a single, catastrophic common factor. The human cost is immeasurable, and the need for accountability is urgent.

Camus

109,199 次观看 • 11 个月前

Shocking footage from the Democratic Republic of Congo shows a Congolese soldier who was being given instructions to eliminate anyone with a long nose. A Kenyan man was almost shot for having a long nose, similar to those of many Rwandese. In the video, the soldier threatens mechanics working on trucks, saying, "This is Congo, we have permission to eliminate anyone with a long nose because they are all Rwandese" President Felix Tshisekedi of Congo is known for tribalism, and it is reflected in the DRC Army. As long as the international community remains silent, more Congolese citizens will be eliminated simply because of the features of their nose.
2:26

Shocking footage from the Democratic Republic of Congo shows a Congolese soldier who was being given instructions to eliminate anyone with a long nose. A Kenyan man was almost shot for having a long nose, similar to those of many Rwandese. In the video, the soldier threatens mechanics working on trucks, saying, "This is Congo, we have permission to eliminate anyone with a long nose because they are all Rwandese" President Felix Tshisekedi of Congo is known for tribalism, and it is reflected in the DRC Army. As long as the international community remains silent, more Congolese citizens will be eliminated simply because of the features of their nose.

Africa Today Media Group

585,564 次观看 • 5 个月前

A bombshell scientific publication confirms a critical danger in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, and the implications are as severe as they are alarming. The core issue is plasmid DNA contamination. New research confirms this contaminating DNA is not just present in the vial; it is capable of entering human cells. This fact alone is concerning, but the true danger lies in what this DNA contains. Scientists have identified the presence of an SV40 viral promoter/enhancer sequence within Pfizer's plasmid DNA. For decades, SV40 has been known to be a potent tool for driving gene expression and is associated with potential genomic integration risks. Here is why this is a catastrophic failure in regulatory disclosure and vaccine design: 1. Nuclear Entry & Genomic Integration: The SV40 promoter is functionally active in human cells. Its presence means the contaminating plasmid DNA has a non-zero chance of entering the nucleus of a human cell. Once inside the nucleus, it runs a tangible risk of integrating into the human genome. 2. Uncontrolled, Long-Term Gene Expression: If integration occurs, it could effectively turn the vaccine into an unintended and uncontrolled gene therapy. This could force the body to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein indefinitely—for months, years, or permanently, with unknown health consequences. 3. A Deliberate Omission? Most damningly, Pfizer never disclosed the presence of this known biohazard, the SV40 sequence, to regulatory bodies during the approval process. There was no functional reason for its inclusion, as Moderna's production process utilized a standard bacterial plasmid without such dangerous components. The authors of this pivotal study are now calling for the immediate suspension of these mRNA vaccines until a full understanding of their long-term genomic risks is achieved. They further state that Pfizer and BioNTech must be held accountable for exposing the global population to a risk this significant without informed consent. This is no longer speculation. This is published, peer-reviewed science confirming a pathway for potential permanent alteration of the human genome. The demand for transparency and accountability has never been more urgent.
3:00

A bombshell scientific publication confirms a critical danger in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, and the implications are as severe as they are alarming. The core issue is plasmid DNA contamination. New research confirms this contaminating DNA is not just present in the vial; it is capable of entering human cells. This fact alone is concerning, but the true danger lies in what this DNA contains. Scientists have identified the presence of an SV40 viral promoter/enhancer sequence within Pfizer's plasmid DNA. For decades, SV40 has been known to be a potent tool for driving gene expression and is associated with potential genomic integration risks. Here is why this is a catastrophic failure in regulatory disclosure and vaccine design: 1. Nuclear Entry & Genomic Integration: The SV40 promoter is functionally active in human cells. Its presence means the contaminating plasmid DNA has a non-zero chance of entering the nucleus of a human cell. Once inside the nucleus, it runs a tangible risk of integrating into the human genome. 2. Uncontrolled, Long-Term Gene Expression: If integration occurs, it could effectively turn the vaccine into an unintended and uncontrolled gene therapy. This could force the body to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein indefinitely—for months, years, or permanently, with unknown health consequences. 3. A Deliberate Omission? Most damningly, Pfizer never disclosed the presence of this known biohazard, the SV40 sequence, to regulatory bodies during the approval process. There was no functional reason for its inclusion, as Moderna's production process utilized a standard bacterial plasmid without such dangerous components. The authors of this pivotal study are now calling for the immediate suspension of these mRNA vaccines until a full understanding of their long-term genomic risks is achieved. They further state that Pfizer and BioNTech must be held accountable for exposing the global population to a risk this significant without informed consent. This is no longer speculation. This is published, peer-reviewed science confirming a pathway for potential permanent alteration of the human genome. The demand for transparency and accountability has never been more urgent.

Camus

205,951 次观看 • 1 年前

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.
1:55

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.

Camus

103,550 次观看 • 11 个月前

A catastrophic wave of iatrogenic illness is sweeping through the medical community itself. Thousands of doctors who complied with the COVID-19 vaccine mandates are now becoming patients, suffering from sudden heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and aggressive "turbo cancers." As Dr. Makis states: "99% of doctors took the shots. They went all in on the COVID vaccine fraud, and now they are paying the price." The consequences are dire and already unfolding: - A Silent Plea for Help: Vaccine-injured physicians are now seeking help in secret, ashamed to admit their injuries. They are quietly asking for treatments like Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. - The Great Retirement: Instead of working into their 70s, doctors in their 40s are closing their practices and retiring early due to debilitating health issues. We are losing our most experienced caregivers at an alarming rate. This is not a simple staffing shortage. This is a systemic collapse of the human capital within medicine. So, what will fill this void? It won't be foreign doctors or new graduates. The system is breaking too fast. The replacement is already being prepared: Artificial Intelligence. Within the next five years, AI will begin its rapid integration into clinical practice, not as a tool for doctors, but as their replacement. The mass disabling of the medical profession is creating the vacuum that technology is poised to fill. The digital transformation of medicine is coming, and it is being accelerated by a tragic, man-made health crisis. The frontline has shifted from the ICU to the very integrity of the medical profession.
1:37

A catastrophic wave of iatrogenic illness is sweeping through the medical community itself. Thousands of doctors who complied with the COVID-19 vaccine mandates are now becoming patients, suffering from sudden heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and aggressive "turbo cancers." As Dr. Makis states: "99% of doctors took the shots. They went all in on the COVID vaccine fraud, and now they are paying the price." The consequences are dire and already unfolding: - A Silent Plea for Help: Vaccine-injured physicians are now seeking help in secret, ashamed to admit their injuries. They are quietly asking for treatments like Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. - The Great Retirement: Instead of working into their 70s, doctors in their 40s are closing their practices and retiring early due to debilitating health issues. We are losing our most experienced caregivers at an alarming rate. This is not a simple staffing shortage. This is a systemic collapse of the human capital within medicine. So, what will fill this void? It won't be foreign doctors or new graduates. The system is breaking too fast. The replacement is already being prepared: Artificial Intelligence. Within the next five years, AI will begin its rapid integration into clinical practice, not as a tool for doctors, but as their replacement. The mass disabling of the medical profession is creating the vacuum that technology is poised to fill. The digital transformation of medicine is coming, and it is being accelerated by a tragic, man-made health crisis. The frontline has shifted from the ICU to the very integrity of the medical profession.

Camus

310,653 次观看 • 11 个月前

Bret Weinstein issues a critical challenge to the prevailing narrative on vaccine safety and policy, framing it as a fundamental failure of cost-benefit analysis and public health strategy. He argues that all current vaccine platforms carry significant, unique defects, mandating a position of extreme caution. The central question is not if a vaccine can be made, but when a disease is serious enough—and a vaccine safe enough—to justify its use. Weinstein dissects the measles example: while dangerous in a modern context, its threat is amplified by the population's underlying poor health. This vulnerability forces a tragic choice—use a potentially harmful vaccine to limit immediate damage, but at a massive long-term cost. The true solution, he contends, isn't perpetual vaccination but restoring population health so diseases like measles become manageable again. The goal isn't to prevent infection entirely, but to ensure robust health outcomes when infection occurs. He then highlights the catastrophic flaw in the system: the absence of properly controlled studies. Without them, we cannot possibly compare the lives lost to a disease like measles (perhaps 200/year in the U.S.) versus the lives lost or damaged by vaccine-related harms, such as adjuvants triggering fatal allergies or asthma. His verdict: A vaccine is only valid if it demonstrates a net benefit in a rigorous, controlled study that measures all-cause mortality. Until such studies are conducted and transparently reviewed, the public is being asked to accept a medical intervention without knowing its true cost. The current model, he warns, prioritizes a short-term fix over long-term health, and we are all paying the price.
2:30

Bret Weinstein issues a critical challenge to the prevailing narrative on vaccine safety and policy, framing it as a fundamental failure of cost-benefit analysis and public health strategy. He argues that all current vaccine platforms carry significant, unique defects, mandating a position of extreme caution. The central question is not if a vaccine can be made, but when a disease is serious enough—and a vaccine safe enough—to justify its use. Weinstein dissects the measles example: while dangerous in a modern context, its threat is amplified by the population's underlying poor health. This vulnerability forces a tragic choice—use a potentially harmful vaccine to limit immediate damage, but at a massive long-term cost. The true solution, he contends, isn't perpetual vaccination but restoring population health so diseases like measles become manageable again. The goal isn't to prevent infection entirely, but to ensure robust health outcomes when infection occurs. He then highlights the catastrophic flaw in the system: the absence of properly controlled studies. Without them, we cannot possibly compare the lives lost to a disease like measles (perhaps 200/year in the U.S.) versus the lives lost or damaged by vaccine-related harms, such as adjuvants triggering fatal allergies or asthma. His verdict: A vaccine is only valid if it demonstrates a net benefit in a rigorous, controlled study that measures all-cause mortality. Until such studies are conducted and transparently reviewed, the public is being asked to accept a medical intervention without knowing its true cost. The current model, he warns, prioritizes a short-term fix over long-term health, and we are all paying the price.

Camus

59,857 次观看 • 1 年前

VIDEO | Delhi: “First objection is you are calling the Parliament for a revolutionary thing in favour of women's representation. Do it. Why link it to other things? Why link it to delimitation? Why link it to census? So my first objection is women are being used as a shield for something altogether different and sinister. This is very cynical. The government has been saying that the delimitation that they would bring will maintain the current ratio or proportion of each state. This is not what the bill says. It's completely against what the government has been promising... So this is cheating. And number three, fundamentally, this kind of delimitation, which changes the composition of the parliament in the manner in which it is being suggested, is not in the long-term interest of this country. I do not speak as a North Indian or a South Indian, not as a supporter or opponent of this government. After 100 years, none of us would be here. But our children would be here. India will still be here. Let us not do something which goes against long-term unity and integrity of this country. And this bill has that danger... Unfortunately, for the short-term electoral gains, this government is compromising the long-term unity and integrity of this country,” says political activist Yogendra Yadav after a Congress meeting on the women’s quota and delimitation. (Full video available on PTI Videos -
2:14

VIDEO | Delhi: “First objection is you are calling the Parliament for a revolutionary thing in favour of women's representation. Do it. Why link it to other things? Why link it to delimitation? Why link it to census? So my first objection is women are being used as a shield for something altogether different and sinister. This is very cynical. The government has been saying that the delimitation that they would bring will maintain the current ratio or proportion of each state. This is not what the bill says. It's completely against what the government has been promising... So this is cheating. And number three, fundamentally, this kind of delimitation, which changes the composition of the parliament in the manner in which it is being suggested, is not in the long-term interest of this country. I do not speak as a North Indian or a South Indian, not as a supporter or opponent of this government. After 100 years, none of us would be here. But our children would be here. India will still be here. Let us not do something which goes against long-term unity and integrity of this country. And this bill has that danger... Unfortunately, for the short-term electoral gains, this government is compromising the long-term unity and integrity of this country,” says political activist Yogendra Yadav after a Congress meeting on the women’s quota and delimitation. (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

59,675 次观看 • 5 个月前

The COVID Vaccine That Could Have Ended the Pandemic—And Stopped a Looming "Pandemic of Cancer." The FDA Blocked It. In a stunning account, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong reveals the story of the vaccine that was—a true sterilizing shot designed not just to reduce symptoms, but to eliminate the COVID-19 virus from the body entirely. While "Operation Warp Speed" championed antibody-based vaccines, Dr. Soon-Shiong's "BioStrike/BioShield" took a different path. It was engineered to activate T-cells and Natural Killer cells—the body's elite forces for hunting and destroying viruses. His vaccine was the only candidate in a key primate trial that successfully cleared the virus. It promised not just temporary protection, but long-term immunity that could prevent transmission and stop the virus in its tracks. Yet, when he applied to the FDA for a Phase II trial to deploy it as a crucial booster, he was met with a wall of silence and refusal. At the same time, the manufacturing ecosystem was entirely consumed by the major players, leaving no resources for this superior alternative. Dr. Soon-Shiong issues a dire warning rooted in science: COVID-19 is a systemic vascular virus. When it lingers, it causes chronic inflammation. This inflammation, he states, has a "sad, sad chance" of triggering a looming global pandemic of cancer with a 5-10 year latency. The world was given a tool to reduce immediate mortality. But it was denied the tool that could have cleared the virus, potentially prevented long COVID, and averted a future cancer crisis. This is not just a story of a missed opportunity; it's a warning we must now heed.
7:57

The COVID Vaccine That Could Have Ended the Pandemic—And Stopped a Looming "Pandemic of Cancer." The FDA Blocked It. In a stunning account, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong reveals the story of the vaccine that was—a true sterilizing shot designed not just to reduce symptoms, but to eliminate the COVID-19 virus from the body entirely. While "Operation Warp Speed" championed antibody-based vaccines, Dr. Soon-Shiong's "BioStrike/BioShield" took a different path. It was engineered to activate T-cells and Natural Killer cells—the body's elite forces for hunting and destroying viruses. His vaccine was the only candidate in a key primate trial that successfully cleared the virus. It promised not just temporary protection, but long-term immunity that could prevent transmission and stop the virus in its tracks. Yet, when he applied to the FDA for a Phase II trial to deploy it as a crucial booster, he was met with a wall of silence and refusal. At the same time, the manufacturing ecosystem was entirely consumed by the major players, leaving no resources for this superior alternative. Dr. Soon-Shiong issues a dire warning rooted in science: COVID-19 is a systemic vascular virus. When it lingers, it causes chronic inflammation. This inflammation, he states, has a "sad, sad chance" of triggering a looming global pandemic of cancer with a 5-10 year latency. The world was given a tool to reduce immediate mortality. But it was denied the tool that could have cleared the virus, potentially prevented long COVID, and averted a future cancer crisis. This is not just a story of a missed opportunity; it's a warning we must now heed.

Camus

300,551 次观看 • 11 个月前

Peter Thiel: Think of the future on three horizons “What you end up doing when you think of the future as indefinite is you pick a job that will be good on your resume because it will then lead to a different job later on.” Instead of viewing the future as indefinite, Thiel suggests that the students in the audience think of the future on three horizons: short term, medium term, and long term. Very short term is: Are you going to be happy and will you be learning a lot? Very long term is: Are you working on something important or meaningful? “I think we are in a skewed world where we overweight the medium term, and we underweight some combination of the short term and the long term.” Thiel would recalibrate it to: “Focus on some combination of short term and long term. And forget about the medium term.”
1:01

Peter Thiel: Think of the future on three horizons “What you end up doing when you think of the future as indefinite is you pick a job that will be good on your resume because it will then lead to a different job later on.” Instead of viewing the future as indefinite, Thiel suggests that the students in the audience think of the future on three horizons: short term, medium term, and long term. Very short term is: Are you going to be happy and will you be learning a lot? Very long term is: Are you working on something important or meaningful? “I think we are in a skewed world where we overweight the medium term, and we underweight some combination of the short term and the long term.” Thiel would recalibrate it to: “Focus on some combination of short term and long term. And forget about the medium term.”

Startup Archive

69,175 次观看 • 2 年前