Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

A Chinese-made Type 59 tank suddenly exploded while firing during a Bangladesh Army live-fire exercise at the Hathazari training ground in Chittagong. Two soldiers inside the tank were killed, while another officer was seriously injured. The exact cause of the explosion remains under investigation. One initial possibility is an...

srijanpalsingh's profile picture

Srijan Pal Singh

52,945 subscribers

11,360 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

2 Comments

Rahul's profile picture
Rahul1 day ago

Aur test karo yr plzzz

Mr.Cryptic's profile picture
Mr.Cryptic1 day ago

BD to China ….

Related Videos

🚨 VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED 🚨 MADE IN #CHINA MOMENT, When “Made in China” isn’t just a label… it’s a warning. #Bangladesh Army’s Chinese-origin Type 69IIG tank reportedly exploded during a firing exercise in Hathazari, Chattogram. > 2 crew members reportedly killed > 1 officer reportedly injured > Officer shifted to Chittagong CMH > Cause of the explosion remains under investigation A battle tank is supposed to survive the firing exercise. This one reportedly became the firing exercise. Chinese defence export starter pack: Looks like a tank. Moves like a tank. Until the firing starts. Chinese paper tank DLC unlocked. 😂
2:13

🚨 VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED 🚨 MADE IN #CHINA MOMENT, When “Made in China” isn’t just a label… it’s a warning. #Bangladesh Army’s Chinese-origin Type 69IIG tank reportedly exploded during a firing exercise in Hathazari, Chattogram. > 2 crew members reportedly killed > 1 officer reportedly injured > Officer shifted to Chittagong CMH > Cause of the explosion remains under investigation A battle tank is supposed to survive the firing exercise. This one reportedly became the firing exercise. Chinese defence export starter pack: Looks like a tank. Moves like a tank. Until the firing starts. Chinese paper tank DLC unlocked. 😂

Shadow IND

40,614 views • 2 days ago

🚨 TANK EXPLODES DURING FIRING EXERCISE 🇧🇩💥 A Chinese-origin Type 69IIG tank reportedly exploded during a firing exercise in Hathazari, Chattogram, Bangladesh. 📍 2 crew members reportedly killed 📍 1 officer reportedly injured 📍 Injured officer shifted to Chittagong CMH The cause of the explosion is yet to be established. Viewers Discretion Advised
2:13

🚨 TANK EXPLODES DURING FIRING EXERCISE 🇧🇩💥 A Chinese-origin Type 69IIG tank reportedly exploded during a firing exercise in Hathazari, Chattogram, Bangladesh. 📍 2 crew members reportedly killed 📍 1 officer reportedly injured 📍 Injured officer shifted to Chittagong CMH The cause of the explosion is yet to be established. Viewers Discretion Advised

OsintTV 📺

61,562 views • 3 days ago

2x Bangladesh army soldiers were killed whilst conducting life fire training with a Type 59 (knock off T-54) tank at the Hathazari Field Firing Range in Chattogram. An additional soldier was wounded in the incident and is expected to survive. Fire your 100mm rifled main guns accordingly... 👀💥 #bangladesh #tank #Type59 #TWAT #chinese #army #t54 #iraq #iran #100mm #failure #nope #chattogram #বাংলাদেশ
2:48

2x Bangladesh army soldiers were killed whilst conducting life fire training with a Type 59 (knock off T-54) tank at the Hathazari Field Firing Range in Chattogram. An additional soldier was wounded in the incident and is expected to survive. Fire your 100mm rifled main guns accordingly... 👀💥 #bangladesh #tank #Type59 #TWAT #chinese #army #t54 #iraq #iran #100mm #failure #nope #chattogram #বাংলাদেশ

Mrgunsngear

49,630 views • 2 days ago

Viewer Discretion is Advised ⚠️ Two Bangladesh Army soldiers were killed and an officer critically wounded after a tank exploded during a live-fire training exercise at the Hathazari Field Firing Range in Chattogram, Bangladesh. [🎥: Defense Research Forum]
2:48

Viewer Discretion is Advised ⚠️ Two Bangladesh Army soldiers were killed and an officer critically wounded after a tank exploded during a live-fire training exercise at the Hathazari Field Firing Range in Chattogram, Bangladesh. [🎥: Defense Research Forum]

SIKAOFFICIAL🦍

29,222 views • 2 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi | On China-Pakistan collusivity during Operation Sindoor, former CDS Anil Chauhan says, "Pakistan's inventory of its platform today, 70 or 80% is of Chinese origin. Whether it is land-based, air platforms, some naval platforms, we also have an inventory of foreign platforms. And when we get those platforms, the maintenance and serviceability is the responsibility of the OEM, and their representatives are normally in the countries in which this equipment is deployed because they're supposed to keep them serviceable... Chinese OEM people would have been there, and that's what Chinese have admitted that their people were there... Today in our country also there would have been Russian, French, Israeli OEMs... So it is a contractual obligation..."
1:35

#WATCH | Delhi | On China-Pakistan collusivity during Operation Sindoor, former CDS Anil Chauhan says, "Pakistan's inventory of its platform today, 70 or 80% is of Chinese origin. Whether it is land-based, air platforms, some naval platforms, we also have an inventory of foreign platforms. And when we get those platforms, the maintenance and serviceability is the responsibility of the OEM, and their representatives are normally in the countries in which this equipment is deployed because they're supposed to keep them serviceable... Chinese OEM people would have been there, and that's what Chinese have admitted that their people were there... Today in our country also there would have been Russian, French, Israeli OEMs... So it is a contractual obligation..."

ANI

186,885 views • 17 days ago

JUST IN: A drone just hit a fuel tank at the busiest airport in the Middle East. The Dubai Media Office confirmed it 23 minutes ago. “A drone incident in the vicinity of Dubai International Airport (DXB) affected one of the fuel tanks. Dubai Civil Defence teams are currently working to bring the fire under control. No injuries have been reported so far.” That is the official statement from Dubai Media Office, posted in English and Arabic, with thousands of views in the first half hour. The fuel tank is burning. Civil Defence is on scene. The airport that processed 87 million passengers last year, the global hub that connects 260 destinations across six continents, the physical embodiment of everything Dubai built over three decades, has a fuel tank on fire because a drone that costs less than a business-class seat through Terminal 3 reached the aviation fuel supply that keeps the hub operational. This is the third confirmed drone incident at or near DXB since the war began. On 11 March, two drones struck near the airport, injuring four people. On 1 March, drones hit AWS data centres in the same corridor. Today, the target was not a server farm or a residential tower. It was aviation fuel. The escalation is vertical: from data to shelter to the liquid that makes the airport function. Fuel tanks at international airports are not incidental targets. They are the circulatory system of aviation. DXB operates on jet fuel stored in tank farms adjacent to the runways. A sustained fire in a fuel tank does not merely delay flights. It grounds the refuelling infrastructure that determines whether aircraft depart at all. Civil Defence is containing this fire. The question is not whether this fire is contained. The question is whether the next drone reaches the next tank, and whether the insurance market, the airline route planners, and the 87 million annual passengers calculate that a 94% interception rate over an airport fuel farm is sufficient assurance to book the ticket. The cumulative toll on the UAE since 28 February: 294 ballistic missiles, 15 cruise missiles, over 1,600 drones. Six dead. 141 injured. AWS data centres struck. Creek Harbour and 23 Marina towers burning from debris. The Burj Al Arab facade hit. Jebel Ali Port targeted. Fujairah oil zone fires. The Iranian Hospital closed. Five schools shuttered. Twenty-one people charged for filming. And now a fuel tank at the airport that defines the city burning while Civil Defence teams work to contain what the air defence system intercepted everywhere except here. The $600 million daily regional tourism loss was calculated before a fuel tank at DXB caught fire. The DFM Real Estate Index was down 21.4% before a fuel tank at DXB caught fire. The $20 billion DFC insurance facility had zero confirmed takers before a fuel tank at DXB caught fire. Every metric of economic damage that existed this morning is now being recalculated against a new data point: the airport itself is no longer outside the target set. Dubai built the busiest airport in the Middle East to prove the Gulf was open for business. Iran just proved it is open for drones. The fuel tank is burning. Civil Defence is responding. No injuries reported. And somewhere in the Gulf, a Shahed that cost $20,000 to $35,000 just imposed a repricing event on an aviation hub worth hundreds of billions by reaching the one target that converts a “drone incident” from a security event into an infrastructure crisis: the fuel that keeps the planes flying. Full analysis!
0:20

JUST IN: A drone just hit a fuel tank at the busiest airport in the Middle East. The Dubai Media Office confirmed it 23 minutes ago. “A drone incident in the vicinity of Dubai International Airport (DXB) affected one of the fuel tanks. Dubai Civil Defence teams are currently working to bring the fire under control. No injuries have been reported so far.” That is the official statement from Dubai Media Office, posted in English and Arabic, with thousands of views in the first half hour. The fuel tank is burning. Civil Defence is on scene. The airport that processed 87 million passengers last year, the global hub that connects 260 destinations across six continents, the physical embodiment of everything Dubai built over three decades, has a fuel tank on fire because a drone that costs less than a business-class seat through Terminal 3 reached the aviation fuel supply that keeps the hub operational. This is the third confirmed drone incident at or near DXB since the war began. On 11 March, two drones struck near the airport, injuring four people. On 1 March, drones hit AWS data centres in the same corridor. Today, the target was not a server farm or a residential tower. It was aviation fuel. The escalation is vertical: from data to shelter to the liquid that makes the airport function. Fuel tanks at international airports are not incidental targets. They are the circulatory system of aviation. DXB operates on jet fuel stored in tank farms adjacent to the runways. A sustained fire in a fuel tank does not merely delay flights. It grounds the refuelling infrastructure that determines whether aircraft depart at all. Civil Defence is containing this fire. The question is not whether this fire is contained. The question is whether the next drone reaches the next tank, and whether the insurance market, the airline route planners, and the 87 million annual passengers calculate that a 94% interception rate over an airport fuel farm is sufficient assurance to book the ticket. The cumulative toll on the UAE since 28 February: 294 ballistic missiles, 15 cruise missiles, over 1,600 drones. Six dead. 141 injured. AWS data centres struck. Creek Harbour and 23 Marina towers burning from debris. The Burj Al Arab facade hit. Jebel Ali Port targeted. Fujairah oil zone fires. The Iranian Hospital closed. Five schools shuttered. Twenty-one people charged for filming. And now a fuel tank at the airport that defines the city burning while Civil Defence teams work to contain what the air defence system intercepted everywhere except here. The $600 million daily regional tourism loss was calculated before a fuel tank at DXB caught fire. The DFM Real Estate Index was down 21.4% before a fuel tank at DXB caught fire. The $20 billion DFC insurance facility had zero confirmed takers before a fuel tank at DXB caught fire. Every metric of economic damage that existed this morning is now being recalculated against a new data point: the airport itself is no longer outside the target set. Dubai built the busiest airport in the Middle East to prove the Gulf was open for business. Iran just proved it is open for drones. The fuel tank is burning. Civil Defence is responding. No injuries reported. And somewhere in the Gulf, a Shahed that cost $20,000 to $35,000 just imposed a repricing event on an aviation hub worth hundreds of billions by reaching the one target that converts a “drone incident” from a security event into an infrastructure crisis: the fuel that keeps the planes flying. Full analysis!

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

1,101,554 views • 6 months ago

🔴 Protesters are blocking a fire truck and forcing it to empty its water tank - the same tank that was meant to refill the water cannon used to disperse demonstrations. ⚗️ As you can see and as citizens point out, the water is white, thicker in consistency, foamy and has a strong odor. 🔵 This is yet another piece of evidence suggesting that during the 2024 protest dispersals, the ruling party "Georgian Dream" likely used a toxic substance and the BBC investigation is close to the truth. ❗This issue urgently requires international attention and investigation! #BBC #TheCamiteCase #GeorgiaProtests #terrorinGeorgia
0:46

🔴 Protesters are blocking a fire truck and forcing it to empty its water tank - the same tank that was meant to refill the water cannon used to disperse demonstrations. ⚗️ As you can see and as citizens point out, the water is white, thicker in consistency, foamy and has a strong odor. 🔵 This is yet another piece of evidence suggesting that during the 2024 protest dispersals, the ruling party "Georgian Dream" likely used a toxic substance and the BBC investigation is close to the truth. ❗This issue urgently requires international attention and investigation! #BBC #TheCamiteCase #GeorgiaProtests #terrorinGeorgia

A Little Georgian Warrior🇬🇪🇺🇦🇪🇺

110,742 views • 9 months ago

🇹🇼🇨🇳⚠️ Taiwan has uncovered a serious security breach inside its military drone supply chain, with Chinese-made electronics allegedly concealed inside UAVs delivered directly to the Taiwanese Army. According to Taiwan News, prosecutors detained the head of one drone manufacturer and a technical officer from another company after an Army inspection found Chinese-made chips and flight-control boards inside training drones. Investigators allege that certificates of origin were falsified and Chinese markings on components were removed or concealed to bypass military procurement restrictions. The suspects are being investigated under Taiwan’s National Security Act and for attempted fraud. The case exposes precisely the vulnerability Taiwan is trying to eliminate as it rapidly expands its unmanned arsenal. Taipei wants a trusted, China-free drone supply chain because Chinese components inside military systems create potential cybersecurity, intelligence and wartime supply risks. With Taiwan planning to acquire hundreds of thousands of drones as part of its emerging “hellscape” deterrence strategy, ensuring that Beijing-linked technology cannot quietly penetrate those systems is becoming a national-security requirement, not merely a procurement issue.
0:21

🇹🇼🇨🇳⚠️ Taiwan has uncovered a serious security breach inside its military drone supply chain, with Chinese-made electronics allegedly concealed inside UAVs delivered directly to the Taiwanese Army. According to Taiwan News, prosecutors detained the head of one drone manufacturer and a technical officer from another company after an Army inspection found Chinese-made chips and flight-control boards inside training drones. Investigators allege that certificates of origin were falsified and Chinese markings on components were removed or concealed to bypass military procurement restrictions. The suspects are being investigated under Taiwan’s National Security Act and for attempted fraud. The case exposes precisely the vulnerability Taiwan is trying to eliminate as it rapidly expands its unmanned arsenal. Taipei wants a trusted, China-free drone supply chain because Chinese components inside military systems create potential cybersecurity, intelligence and wartime supply risks. With Taiwan planning to acquire hundreds of thousands of drones as part of its emerging “hellscape” deterrence strategy, ensuring that Beijing-linked technology cannot quietly penetrate those systems is becoming a national-security requirement, not merely a procurement issue.

NSTRIKE

95,452 views • 23 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi | Foreign affairs expert Sushant Sareen said, "Bangladesh is rediscovering its Pakistani roots. They are following the Pakistani playbook. The regime in Bangladesh, which is an illegal, illegitimate unelected regime is now totally in the Pakistani pocket... For them to overreact to a small demonstration by 15-20 people who obviously felt very strongly about the cross-persecution of minorities, and the brutal killing taking place in Bangladesh, is utterly ridiculous. It's absurd, but to be expected, because absurdity in Pakistan is the same thing, and Bangladesh is now rediscovering its East Pakistan roots... There are also disturbing reports coming in that there are people from the Pakistani establishment who are sitting in government offices in Bangladesh and directing them on what to do. There are reports of Pakistan and Bangladesh trying to enter into a defence deal, which means that there could soon be Pakistani boots on the ground or some other kind of assistance being given to Bangladesh. The regime in Bangladesh is now totally in the Pakistani pocket, and Bangladesh becomes an outpost to attack India... It will be a classic case of Bangladesh cutting not just its nose, but two of its necks to spite India's face... India will need to start rethinking how it plans to deal with Bangladesh. A lot of people consider what India is doing or not doing as a strategic restraint. But I sometimes wonder whether it's restraint or it's strategic paralysis. We need to do certain things, and it should serve as a lesson for India, even for other countries in the neighbourhood andthe rest of the world..." (23.12)
4:59

#WATCH | Delhi | Foreign affairs expert Sushant Sareen said, "Bangladesh is rediscovering its Pakistani roots. They are following the Pakistani playbook. The regime in Bangladesh, which is an illegal, illegitimate unelected regime is now totally in the Pakistani pocket... For them to overreact to a small demonstration by 15-20 people who obviously felt very strongly about the cross-persecution of minorities, and the brutal killing taking place in Bangladesh, is utterly ridiculous. It's absurd, but to be expected, because absurdity in Pakistan is the same thing, and Bangladesh is now rediscovering its East Pakistan roots... There are also disturbing reports coming in that there are people from the Pakistani establishment who are sitting in government offices in Bangladesh and directing them on what to do. There are reports of Pakistan and Bangladesh trying to enter into a defence deal, which means that there could soon be Pakistani boots on the ground or some other kind of assistance being given to Bangladesh. The regime in Bangladesh is now totally in the Pakistani pocket, and Bangladesh becomes an outpost to attack India... It will be a classic case of Bangladesh cutting not just its nose, but two of its necks to spite India's face... India will need to start rethinking how it plans to deal with Bangladesh. A lot of people consider what India is doing or not doing as a strategic restraint. But I sometimes wonder whether it's restraint or it's strategic paralysis. We need to do certain things, and it should serve as a lesson for India, even for other countries in the neighbourhood andthe rest of the world..." (23.12)

ANI

45,870 views • 8 months ago

China’s response was straightforward: A person with mental disorder randomly injured one Chinese citizen and two Japanese nationals in Shanghai. The suspect was arrested. The victims were taken to hospital. The case is under investigation. But the Japanese immediately turned a criminal case that had already been resolved into yet another hysterical performance of national victimhood. Funny how Tokyo loves “individual case” and “complexity” when Chinese diplomats are threatened in Japan, when bomb threats target Chinese missions, when an active-duty SDF member climbs into the Chinese Embassy with a knife. But when one mentally ill person attacks people in China, suddenly Japan discovers trauma, danger, and civilization under siege. China is treating this as an isolated public-security incident. Japan turned it into theater. The man’s illness was medical. The Japanese victim performance is a national instinct. One belongs in a hospital report. The other belongs in a national pathology textbook.
0:29

China’s response was straightforward: A person with mental disorder randomly injured one Chinese citizen and two Japanese nationals in Shanghai. The suspect was arrested. The victims were taken to hospital. The case is under investigation. But the Japanese immediately turned a criminal case that had already been resolved into yet another hysterical performance of national victimhood. Funny how Tokyo loves “individual case” and “complexity” when Chinese diplomats are threatened in Japan, when bomb threats target Chinese missions, when an active-duty SDF member climbs into the Chinese Embassy with a knife. But when one mentally ill person attacks people in China, suddenly Japan discovers trauma, danger, and civilization under siege. China is treating this as an isolated public-security incident. Japan turned it into theater. The man’s illness was medical. The Japanese victim performance is a national instinct. One belongs in a hospital report. The other belongs in a national pathology textbook.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

35,681 views • 3 months ago

A public live-fire demonstration in Taiwan has drawn attention after multiple TOW anti-tank missiles reportedly malfunctioned during a training exercise. According to reports, one missile fell into the water before reaching its target, another hit but failed to detonate, while others missed entirely. The most dramatic moment came when a missile reportedly lost control shortly after launch and crashed near the firing position. The incident is a reminder that in military technology, reliability depends not only on the weapon itself—but also on the systems and people supporting it. #taiwan #missiles #MissileDefense #MissileStrike #Trump #China
2:59

A public live-fire demonstration in Taiwan has drawn attention after multiple TOW anti-tank missiles reportedly malfunctioned during a training exercise. According to reports, one missile fell into the water before reaching its target, another hit but failed to detonate, while others missed entirely. The most dramatic moment came when a missile reportedly lost control shortly after launch and crashed near the firing position. The incident is a reminder that in military technology, reliability depends not only on the weapon itself—but also on the systems and people supporting it. #taiwan #missiles #MissileDefense #MissileStrike #Trump #China

Srijan Pal Singh

18,834 views • 2 months ago

During his interview with Mehdi Hasan on his We're Not Kidding podcast, Hasan explains the origin of his Mao suit and explains that his suits were tailor-made for him while he was in China. He also discusses the investigation into his Cuba trip by U.S. Treasury Department and believes that there is a broader RICO charge for the entire leftist movement that the Department is trying to establish, but specifically around Roy Singham. Hasan himself has yet to receive a subpoena.
2:05

During his interview with Mehdi Hasan on his We're Not Kidding podcast, Hasan explains the origin of his Mao suit and explains that his suits were tailor-made for him while he was in China. He also discusses the investigation into his Cuba trip by U.S. Treasury Department and believes that there is a broader RICO charge for the entire leftist movement that the Department is trying to establish, but specifically around Roy Singham. Hasan himself has yet to receive a subpoena.

adri ♡

61,128 views • 1 month ago

When the Germans advanced towards Moscow in 1941, Soviet troops were in a nearly hopeless situation because they lacked effective anti-tank weapons. Out of desperation, highly trained military dogs were used to destroy the enemy.... In the early years of World War II, Soviet anti-tank dogs posed a major threat to the German advance. Strapped with explosives, these animals were sent on missions to destroy enemy equipment. While today this fact might seem disturbing to animal rights activists, it's important to remember how desperate those times were, when a formidable and evil enemy was almost at the Kremlin gates. Machine guns on German tanks were too high to reach the low-running 'suicide' dogs, and thanks to cover from Soviet infantry the Germans couldn't easily emerge from their tanks and shoot the dogs with rifles. German tank units often stopped their attack if they saw tank destroyer battalions with dogs on the battlefield. The only effective method to prevent such an attack was to use flamethrowers. Often, when German forces went on the offensive, they shot all dogs along the way. Even Luftwaffe planes opened fire on them. The Soviet Union didn’t start using anti-tank dogs in response to the Nazi invasion of 1941. In fact, they began training such dogs in the 1930s, well before the outbreak of the Great Patriotic War. The anti-tank dogs were trained to crawl under enemy tanks while carrying explosives on their bodies (12 kg of TNT). A long lever set off an explosion upon contact with the target. The dogs were instructed how to climb under tanks. They were starved for several days, and pieces of meat were placed under practice tanks to fool the dogs into thinking that food could be found under all tanks. They were also taught not to fear heavy artillery, and were trained to crawl under the back of a tank to avoid fire from enemy machine guns. The first anti-tank dogs were introduced into the Red Army in 1939, and two years later the dogs were put to the test in battle. Anti-tank dogs from the 1st special battalion (212 dogs and 199 trainers) were first deployed in battle near Moscow. The dogs' first major attack was a complete disaster because there was no cover from Soviet infantry. As a result, the Germans easily shot the dogs. In addition, the trainers had made a serious tactical error by training the dogs with Soviet tanks, which ran on diesel. The animals were accustomed to the smell of diesel, but German tanks used gasoline. Thus, the dogs were completely confused on the battlefield. Those soldiers who weren't killed, surrendered with their dogs. During interrogations, the captive trainers revealed Soviet methods used to train anti-tank dogs. Even though the 1st special battalion was wiped out, the Soviet Union continued to use dogs against the Germans. Tactics were changed and dog training resumed. By the end of 1941, over 1,000 dogs were fighting on the front and the next year the number exceeded 2,000. On July 21, 1942, suicide dogs helped determine the outcome of a major battle near Taganrog on the Sea of Azov. When 40 enemy tanks smashed through a battery of anti-tank guns and compromised the position of the naval infantry brigade, the 4th company of anti-tank dogs was the only thing that stood between the command post and the Nazis. Simultaneously, 56 dogs launched an attack and destroyed many enemy tanks. Not only did those dogs stop the offensive, but they also forced the Germans to flee the battlefield. During the Siege of Leningrad, a group of dogs blew up enemy tanks and fortifications. They had slyly made their way around barbed wire, identified the enemy’s location and ran towards the entrance of the bunkers where they had detected human presence. They managed to blow up several bunkers, as well as an ammunition depot. #archaeohistories
0:53

When the Germans advanced towards Moscow in 1941, Soviet troops were in a nearly hopeless situation because they lacked effective anti-tank weapons. Out of desperation, highly trained military dogs were used to destroy the enemy.... In the early years of World War II, Soviet anti-tank dogs posed a major threat to the German advance. Strapped with explosives, these animals were sent on missions to destroy enemy equipment. While today this fact might seem disturbing to animal rights activists, it's important to remember how desperate those times were, when a formidable and evil enemy was almost at the Kremlin gates. Machine guns on German tanks were too high to reach the low-running 'suicide' dogs, and thanks to cover from Soviet infantry the Germans couldn't easily emerge from their tanks and shoot the dogs with rifles. German tank units often stopped their attack if they saw tank destroyer battalions with dogs on the battlefield. The only effective method to prevent such an attack was to use flamethrowers. Often, when German forces went on the offensive, they shot all dogs along the way. Even Luftwaffe planes opened fire on them. The Soviet Union didn’t start using anti-tank dogs in response to the Nazi invasion of 1941. In fact, they began training such dogs in the 1930s, well before the outbreak of the Great Patriotic War. The anti-tank dogs were trained to crawl under enemy tanks while carrying explosives on their bodies (12 kg of TNT). A long lever set off an explosion upon contact with the target. The dogs were instructed how to climb under tanks. They were starved for several days, and pieces of meat were placed under practice tanks to fool the dogs into thinking that food could be found under all tanks. They were also taught not to fear heavy artillery, and were trained to crawl under the back of a tank to avoid fire from enemy machine guns. The first anti-tank dogs were introduced into the Red Army in 1939, and two years later the dogs were put to the test in battle. Anti-tank dogs from the 1st special battalion (212 dogs and 199 trainers) were first deployed in battle near Moscow. The dogs' first major attack was a complete disaster because there was no cover from Soviet infantry. As a result, the Germans easily shot the dogs. In addition, the trainers had made a serious tactical error by training the dogs with Soviet tanks, which ran on diesel. The animals were accustomed to the smell of diesel, but German tanks used gasoline. Thus, the dogs were completely confused on the battlefield. Those soldiers who weren't killed, surrendered with their dogs. During interrogations, the captive trainers revealed Soviet methods used to train anti-tank dogs. Even though the 1st special battalion was wiped out, the Soviet Union continued to use dogs against the Germans. Tactics were changed and dog training resumed. By the end of 1941, over 1,000 dogs were fighting on the front and the next year the number exceeded 2,000. On July 21, 1942, suicide dogs helped determine the outcome of a major battle near Taganrog on the Sea of Azov. When 40 enemy tanks smashed through a battery of anti-tank guns and compromised the position of the naval infantry brigade, the 4th company of anti-tank dogs was the only thing that stood between the command post and the Nazis. Simultaneously, 56 dogs launched an attack and destroyed many enemy tanks. Not only did those dogs stop the offensive, but they also forced the Germans to flee the battlefield. During the Siege of Leningrad, a group of dogs blew up enemy tanks and fortifications. They had slyly made their way around barbed wire, identified the enemy’s location and ran towards the entrance of the bunkers where they had detected human presence. They managed to blow up several bunkers, as well as an ammunition depot. #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

282,494 views • 24 days ago

#BigExposed #MatthewVanDyke Reports are emerging that this is the helicopter in which Matthew VanDyke was allegedly present while extracting his trained snipers during the July–August jihadi protests against an elected government in Bangladesh. Multiple intelligence reports indicate that Matthew VanDyke was on the ground in Dhaka at the time and was personally involved in the protests aimed at toppling the anti–deep state government of Bangladesh. Some of the snipers were seen wearing T-shirts marked with U.S. insignia as they boarded the helicopter. Many people have questioned why it was a Bangladesh Army helicopter. The answer is clear- it belonged to elements within the Bangladesh Army sympathetic to the Pakistan ISI. These officers had been removed and replaced just a few days earlier. This is how an orchestrated regime change became possible in Bangladesh with the active involvement of American deep state mercenaries.
1:30

#BigExposed #MatthewVanDyke Reports are emerging that this is the helicopter in which Matthew VanDyke was allegedly present while extracting his trained snipers during the July–August jihadi protests against an elected government in Bangladesh. Multiple intelligence reports indicate that Matthew VanDyke was on the ground in Dhaka at the time and was personally involved in the protests aimed at toppling the anti–deep state government of Bangladesh. Some of the snipers were seen wearing T-shirts marked with U.S. insignia as they boarded the helicopter. Many people have questioned why it was a Bangladesh Army helicopter. The answer is clear- it belonged to elements within the Bangladesh Army sympathetic to the Pakistan ISI. These officers had been removed and replaced just a few days earlier. This is how an orchestrated regime change became possible in Bangladesh with the active involvement of American deep state mercenaries.

Toofani 🇧🇩

271,444 views • 5 months ago

#WATCH | Dhaka, Bangladesh: Tapan Majumder, Vice Chairman, Hindu Religious Welfare Trust, Ministry of Religious Affairs, says, "Dipu Chandra Das has been killed in front of the government's industry where he served. Indian people took it as a minority being killed in India. They thought that minority killing is generalised in Bangladesh. But many of the Muslim people or young people are also killed in Bangladesh... No country is coming up to protest over the Muslim community people who have been killed here... India is condemning the situation of Bangladesh in many aspects... They are using this tool for their own interest, not for the interest of Bangladesh... This type of demonstration for the Hindu killing outside the country will not be so effective and it will not touch the community feeling in Bangladesh."
3:13

#WATCH | Dhaka, Bangladesh: Tapan Majumder, Vice Chairman, Hindu Religious Welfare Trust, Ministry of Religious Affairs, says, "Dipu Chandra Das has been killed in front of the government's industry where he served. Indian people took it as a minority being killed in India. They thought that minority killing is generalised in Bangladesh. But many of the Muslim people or young people are also killed in Bangladesh... No country is coming up to protest over the Muslim community people who have been killed here... India is condemning the situation of Bangladesh in many aspects... They are using this tool for their own interest, not for the interest of Bangladesh... This type of demonstration for the Hindu killing outside the country will not be so effective and it will not touch the community feeling in Bangladesh."

ANI

102,032 views • 8 months ago

🔥Does Bangladesh has any shame left? Their Prime Minister’s Information Adviser, Zahed Ur Rahman, sits in the Secretariat, microphones in front of him, and announces that Dhaka will buy Chinese J-10CE fighters because “it is now established” that a Chinese J-10 shot down an Indian Rafale in the India-Pakistan war. Established by whom? Pakistan’s ISPR? Beijing’s propaganda mill? Or a Bangladeshi official who has decided 1971 is inconvenient history? The IAF has never officially confirmed that claim. That is not a press conference talking point for a neighbour shopping for the same jet Pakistan used against India. Rafale is a 4.5-generation fighter. Calling a cheaper Chinese single-engine export jet its combat superior because Islamabad said so is not analysis. It is parroting. They looked at Eurofighter and Rafale, flinched at the price, and chose the Chinese option sold as “combat-proven” on the back of Pakistani claims. Cost over capability. Dependency over dignity. This is not a procurement story. It is a signal. West: Pakistan flying Chinese jets. East: Bangladesh lining up the same family of aircraft, plus attack helicopters and UAVs. Same supplier. Same narrative. Same willingness to treat Indian losses as a sales brochure. In 1971 the Indian Army fought so East Pakistan could become Bangladesh. Today an adviser in Dhaka repeats Pakistani kill claims and tells his country the Chinese jet that supposedly beat Rafale is the smart buy. That is not strategic autonomy. That is strategic amnesia, or a calculated tilt. The Indian Army plans for two fronts. This is how a third one is built: cheap Chinese platforms, Pakistani talking points, and a neighbour that pretends it is only “modernising.” Bangladesh thinks it is buying air power. It is buying a leash. And it is advertising which way the leash pulls. India does not need to get emotional. It needs to stay ready, including on the eastern border. History forgotten is history repeated. Jai Hind.
1:27

🔥Does Bangladesh has any shame left? Their Prime Minister’s Information Adviser, Zahed Ur Rahman, sits in the Secretariat, microphones in front of him, and announces that Dhaka will buy Chinese J-10CE fighters because “it is now established” that a Chinese J-10 shot down an Indian Rafale in the India-Pakistan war. Established by whom? Pakistan’s ISPR? Beijing’s propaganda mill? Or a Bangladeshi official who has decided 1971 is inconvenient history? The IAF has never officially confirmed that claim. That is not a press conference talking point for a neighbour shopping for the same jet Pakistan used against India. Rafale is a 4.5-generation fighter. Calling a cheaper Chinese single-engine export jet its combat superior because Islamabad said so is not analysis. It is parroting. They looked at Eurofighter and Rafale, flinched at the price, and chose the Chinese option sold as “combat-proven” on the back of Pakistani claims. Cost over capability. Dependency over dignity. This is not a procurement story. It is a signal. West: Pakistan flying Chinese jets. East: Bangladesh lining up the same family of aircraft, plus attack helicopters and UAVs. Same supplier. Same narrative. Same willingness to treat Indian losses as a sales brochure. In 1971 the Indian Army fought so East Pakistan could become Bangladesh. Today an adviser in Dhaka repeats Pakistani kill claims and tells his country the Chinese jet that supposedly beat Rafale is the smart buy. That is not strategic autonomy. That is strategic amnesia, or a calculated tilt. The Indian Army plans for two fronts. This is how a third one is built: cheap Chinese platforms, Pakistani talking points, and a neighbour that pretends it is only “modernising.” Bangladesh thinks it is buying air power. It is buying a leash. And it is advertising which way the leash pulls. India does not need to get emotional. It needs to stay ready, including on the eastern border. History forgotten is history repeated. Jai Hind.

Lt Colonel Vikas Gurjar 🇮🇳

42,971 views • 9 days ago

Russian telegram channels posted videos of fiber optic cable FPV strikes on a Ukrainian Abrams tank in Kursk oblast last week. Aside from a concussion, the crew survived without injury and made it back to friendly lines. Michael Kofman and I spoke to the commander of the tank from Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade about what happened, and here is what he told us: (tweeted with his permission) "That's our tank. But they only posted two of the strikes. Yesterday [from last week] was the first time that the crew survived multiple hits while inside a disabled Abrams. Actually, there were 4-6 direct hits. The crew survived, and even without injuries. God bless America. Fiber-optic FPVs. Between four and six hits within like 2 minutes. I believe that at least one more got stuck in the net. Two more missed several minutes before. They apparently hit the engine. They were unable to penetrate either the turret or the hull elsewhere while we were inside. Although they tried and had a lot of time. As I said, this tank had a unique 'cope cage' (actually, 'cope netting') and a lot more ERA than an average Abrams. We – the crew – designed the arrangement of the ERA completely on our own based on an analysis of the previous hits on all the other Abrams tanks and our own knowledge of the weak spots, and that's why we still live after so many simultaneous strikes. And that's why the Abrams rocks. Would be impossible on a [Russian/Soviet] T series tank." Russian FPV crews hit the tank with several more FPVs after it was abandoned, but the tank was not destroyed and might still be salvageable. Because of recent advances, Russian forces may capture it. When I asked how they made it back to friendly lines, "On foot. It was close to the Russian positions. We finished the combat mission and drove back just 1 km from the Russians or even less. We could not evacuate because the FPVs were coming one after another. When I finally could hear no sound, we just jumped out of the tank and ran to a treeline. They were tracking us, so a mortar started working with some more drones, but we crawled away through the treeline. In the end, in a spot still under FPV control, our company commander rushed in and took us away."
0:48

Russian telegram channels posted videos of fiber optic cable FPV strikes on a Ukrainian Abrams tank in Kursk oblast last week. Aside from a concussion, the crew survived without injury and made it back to friendly lines. Michael Kofman and I spoke to the commander of the tank from Ukraine's 47th Mechanized Brigade about what happened, and here is what he told us: (tweeted with his permission) "That's our tank. But they only posted two of the strikes. Yesterday [from last week] was the first time that the crew survived multiple hits while inside a disabled Abrams. Actually, there were 4-6 direct hits. The crew survived, and even without injuries. God bless America. Fiber-optic FPVs. Between four and six hits within like 2 minutes. I believe that at least one more got stuck in the net. Two more missed several minutes before. They apparently hit the engine. They were unable to penetrate either the turret or the hull elsewhere while we were inside. Although they tried and had a lot of time. As I said, this tank had a unique 'cope cage' (actually, 'cope netting') and a lot more ERA than an average Abrams. We – the crew – designed the arrangement of the ERA completely on our own based on an analysis of the previous hits on all the other Abrams tanks and our own knowledge of the weak spots, and that's why we still live after so many simultaneous strikes. And that's why the Abrams rocks. Would be impossible on a [Russian/Soviet] T series tank." Russian FPV crews hit the tank with several more FPVs after it was abandoned, but the tank was not destroyed and might still be salvageable. Because of recent advances, Russian forces may capture it. When I asked how they made it back to friendly lines, "On foot. It was close to the Russian positions. We finished the combat mission and drove back just 1 km from the Russians or even less. We could not evacuate because the FPVs were coming one after another. When I finally could hear no sound, we just jumped out of the tank and ran to a treeline. They were tracking us, so a mortar started working with some more drones, but we crawled away through the treeline. In the end, in a spot still under FPV control, our company commander rushed in and took us away."

Rob Lee

1,358,003 views • 1 year ago

Hamas publishes footage from its large-scale assault on an IDF encampment in southern Gaza's Khan Younis last month. The military said that troops managed to successfully repel the attack on August 20, during which 15 of the Hamas gunmen were killed -- in gun battles, tank shelling, airstrikes, and in one case, being run over by a tank. Three IDF soldiers were injured while exchanging fire with some of the gunmen in a building they managed to enter, one seriously and two lightly. Fighting inside the encampment lasted no longer than 10 minutes before the gunmen began attempting to flee back to a tunnel from which they emerged, according to the IDF’s probe. Despite successfully repelling the attack, the military said it was a failure that the gunmen had managed to infiltrate the encampment. In all, some eight Hamas gunmen were killed inside the post and in the area surrounding it, and around another seven operatives — who had been launching mortars — were eliminated on the outskirts, mainly by airstrikes. Approximately eight gunmen managed to flee back to the tunnel, the IDF probe found.
3:06

Hamas publishes footage from its large-scale assault on an IDF encampment in southern Gaza's Khan Younis last month. The military said that troops managed to successfully repel the attack on August 20, during which 15 of the Hamas gunmen were killed -- in gun battles, tank shelling, airstrikes, and in one case, being run over by a tank. Three IDF soldiers were injured while exchanging fire with some of the gunmen in a building they managed to enter, one seriously and two lightly. Fighting inside the encampment lasted no longer than 10 minutes before the gunmen began attempting to flee back to a tunnel from which they emerged, according to the IDF’s probe. Despite successfully repelling the attack, the military said it was a failure that the gunmen had managed to infiltrate the encampment. In all, some eight Hamas gunmen were killed inside the post and in the area surrounding it, and around another seven operatives — who had been launching mortars — were eliminated on the outskirts, mainly by airstrikes. Approximately eight gunmen managed to flee back to the tunnel, the IDF probe found.

Emanuel (Mannie) Fabian

67,844 views • 11 months ago