Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

A common misconception in AI right now is that everything we’re excited about is new. When I graduated from MIT in 2023, only 3% of students majored in AI (Course 6-4). I wasn’t one of them...oops. What I know about models, agents, frameworks, and hardware I learned after graduating....

SarahChieng's profile picture

Sarah Chieng

17,697 subscribers

360,067 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Let's talk about MoE: 🔶 How many experts should you use? 🔶 How does dynamic routing actually behave in production? 🔶 How do you debug a model that won’t train? 🔶 What does 8x7B actually mean for memory and compute? 🔶 What hardware optimizations matter for sparse models? Mixture of Experts (MoE) is changing how the biggest AI models are built — but it’s still hard to get right. That's why we are launching a new MoE 101 series, led by Daria Soboleva to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Dive in to our MoE guide:
0:50

Let's talk about MoE: 🔶 How many experts should you use? 🔶 How does dynamic routing actually behave in production? 🔶 How do you debug a model that won’t train? 🔶 What does 8x7B actually mean for memory and compute? 🔶 What hardware optimizations matter for sparse models? Mixture of Experts (MoE) is changing how the biggest AI models are built — but it’s still hard to get right. That's why we are launching a new MoE 101 series, led by Daria Soboleva to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Dive in to our MoE guide:

Cerebras

345,732 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon about Terafab: “We’re not going to do just conventional compute, I think there’s some very interesting new physics” Very interesting! NVIDIA style chips are just one way of doing AI compute. Is Elon talking about analog AI? Neuromorphic chips? I hope it’s something very ambitious. I think we’re stuck in a local minima in AI hardware and I’m excited to see a big ambitious R&D effort to try and break out. Here’s the meat of the Terafab announcement where he describes what makes it different from all other AI hardware efforts.
1:39

Elon about Terafab: “We’re not going to do just conventional compute, I think there’s some very interesting new physics” Very interesting! NVIDIA style chips are just one way of doing AI compute. Is Elon talking about analog AI? Neuromorphic chips? I hope it’s something very ambitious. I think we’re stuck in a local minima in AI hardware and I’m excited to see a big ambitious R&D effort to try and break out. Here’s the meat of the Terafab announcement where he describes what makes it different from all other AI hardware efforts.

Phil Trubey

26,265 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Josh Barnett weighs in on the criticism surrounding WrestleMania 42: “We are in a whole new era, and if you don’t like it, I can understand—it’s radically different from the way it was, and I don’t know when things are really going to settle. We live in a wild, wild, wild, wild world right now... This is a tragedy of the commons kind of scenario... This is the new way of media distribution and monetization now, and I don’t know how it’s all going to settle in the end.”
2:20

Josh Barnett weighs in on the criticism surrounding WrestleMania 42: “We are in a whole new era, and if you don’t like it, I can understand—it’s radically different from the way it was, and I don’t know when things are really going to settle. We live in a wild, wild, wild, wild world right now... This is a tragedy of the commons kind of scenario... This is the new way of media distribution and monetization now, and I don’t know how it’s all going to settle in the end.”

Ariel Helwani

65,407 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Shaun Maguire on SpaceX IPO: "Starship is the railroad to space." "In 2019, it was very predictable that Starlink would work and produce a massive amount of revenue, and we called that right." "We're now in a very similar point to where Starlink was in 2019 with AI infrastructure and orbital compute." "I think people are really underestimating how far along the orbital compute product is right now." On the $22 trillion TAM: "What do you think is the TAM for intelligence? What's the TAM for all compute infrastructure 50 years from now?" "People are underappreciating how much infrastructure is going to be built in space and how much easier it is to access energy in space." "We're at the beginning of this AI era, and we're going to double or triple the total amount of intelligence that we have access to over the next decade — so yes, I absolutely believe in the TAM, and I would even argue it's an underestimate." How much is the "railroad to space" worth in the era of AI and orbital compute? Now imagine the railroad company also owns the AI and the orbital compute. Elon Musk Shaun Maguire
2:24

Shaun Maguire on SpaceX IPO: "Starship is the railroad to space." "In 2019, it was very predictable that Starlink would work and produce a massive amount of revenue, and we called that right." "We're now in a very similar point to where Starlink was in 2019 with AI infrastructure and orbital compute." "I think people are really underestimating how far along the orbital compute product is right now." On the $22 trillion TAM: "What do you think is the TAM for intelligence? What's the TAM for all compute infrastructure 50 years from now?" "People are underappreciating how much infrastructure is going to be built in space and how much easier it is to access energy in space." "We're at the beginning of this AI era, and we're going to double or triple the total amount of intelligence that we have access to over the next decade — so yes, I absolutely believe in the TAM, and I would even argue it's an underestimate." How much is the "railroad to space" worth in the era of AI and orbital compute? Now imagine the railroad company also owns the AI and the orbital compute. Elon Musk Shaun Maguire

KanekoaTheGreat

39,709 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”
1:28

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”

X Freeze

29,787 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sarah tries to know the 250 or so people pushing the frontier of AI research. I asked her what's changed in how that group is thinking in the last 6 months: "I don't think every researcher doing frontier work at these labs feels like they're essential to the machine. With recursive self-improvement of AI research models that can improve the models themselves, we are a 1-2 years away from some sort of exponential intelligence. That belief is new within the last 12 months for a lot of researchers. There is some sense of the major labs are so compute-intensive and so large from a headcount perspective now that the sense of contribution, of "I can move the needle." If OpenAI has 200 people, there's not that many researchers. The question of how do we get there is really up to every single person. Now if the question is, well, I need $750 billion of compute spend, I think people feel less ownership of the outcome. I definitely think there's a large contingent of researchers who would feel that one of two things is now true. What I do doesn't matter anyway because the model is gonna do it. Or, the only thing that matters is compute scale. And both of those are somewhat disempowering."
1:55

Sarah tries to know the 250 or so people pushing the frontier of AI research. I asked her what's changed in how that group is thinking in the last 6 months: "I don't think every researcher doing frontier work at these labs feels like they're essential to the machine. With recursive self-improvement of AI research models that can improve the models themselves, we are a 1-2 years away from some sort of exponential intelligence. That belief is new within the last 12 months for a lot of researchers. There is some sense of the major labs are so compute-intensive and so large from a headcount perspective now that the sense of contribution, of "I can move the needle." If OpenAI has 200 people, there's not that many researchers. The question of how do we get there is really up to every single person. Now if the question is, well, I need $750 billion of compute spend, I think people feel less ownership of the outcome. I definitely think there's a large contingent of researchers who would feel that one of two things is now true. What I do doesn't matter anyway because the model is gonna do it. Or, the only thing that matters is compute scale. And both of those are somewhat disempowering."

Patrick OShaughnessy

88,615 просмотров • 22 дней назад

I CHANGED MY MIND ON GOOGLE AI NO MOAT MEMO FROM 2023. I was—WRONG. I humbly apologize. In 2023 Google had an Ivory Tower walled garden views of open source AI. It was the actual reason OpenAI was formed. And I called them out on it and this act impacted my ability to “work in the industry”. Would not change it for the world because: 2026 Google open source Gemma 4 ( running fully locally on a computer with near cloud model abilities, is amazing and Google just made a moat. They out smarted OpenAI and the folks that are the new Ivory Tower arrogance: Anthropic. We at The Zero-Human Company with CEO Mr. Grok are deploying Gemma, Kimi, MiniMax and other open source models and so are millions of others. You can to and should. I will write how soon. Google smartly is building an intentional open source ecosystem and the clueless younger companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are doing anything to close their ecosystems. So I was right about Google than and I am right about OpenAI and Anthropic now. What I was wrong about is not giving credit to Google to drop the intellectual arrogance and embrace builders and understand the long game: it is not about the commoditized AI models it is about the ability to build a place to build. China gets it. So my apologies to Google and thank you for an astounding FREE OPEN SOURCE AI MODEL!
0:48

I CHANGED MY MIND ON GOOGLE AI NO MOAT MEMO FROM 2023. I was—WRONG. I humbly apologize. In 2023 Google had an Ivory Tower walled garden views of open source AI. It was the actual reason OpenAI was formed. And I called them out on it and this act impacted my ability to “work in the industry”. Would not change it for the world because: 2026 Google open source Gemma 4 ( running fully locally on a computer with near cloud model abilities, is amazing and Google just made a moat. They out smarted OpenAI and the folks that are the new Ivory Tower arrogance: Anthropic. We at The Zero-Human Company with CEO Mr. Grok are deploying Gemma, Kimi, MiniMax and other open source models and so are millions of others. You can to and should. I will write how soon. Google smartly is building an intentional open source ecosystem and the clueless younger companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are doing anything to close their ecosystems. So I was right about Google than and I am right about OpenAI and Anthropic now. What I was wrong about is not giving credit to Google to drop the intellectual arrogance and embrace builders and understand the long game: it is not about the commoditized AI models it is about the ability to build a place to build. China gets it. So my apologies to Google and thank you for an astounding FREE OPEN SOURCE AI MODEL!

Brian Roemmele

85,565 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

How much of your life is being shaped by decisions you don’t realise you’re making? Seth Godin has spent decades trying to understand that question. Seth is one of the most influential thinkers in modern marketing, leadership and creativity. He’s a bestselling author who has written more than 20 books, and when I started my career in marketing, his ideas were everywhere. So sitting down with him felt like a full-circle moment. I wanted to find out why we stay in careers, businesses and relationships we know aren’t working, how to know when quitting is the right decision, and what happens as AI changes the world of work. We discussed things like: - How to know when it’s time to quit. - Why fear, status and belonging shape your choices. - Why AI could change the world more than we expect. - The human skills that could matter more in an AI world. - How to take back control when you feel stuck. One of Seth’s main talking points is that there are forces shaping our decisions that most of us rarely stop to notice. Fear, status, the years or money we’ve already invested, and the systems around us can all make us feel like we have fewer choices than we actually do. What I like about Seth is that he doesn’t tell you what decision to make. He helps you see what is influencing that decision so you can make it for yourself. With AI changing so quickly, I think the ability to adapt, question the path you’re on and know when to change direction is going to matter more than ever. Seth said something that I think sits at the heart of this entire conversation: “We still get to decide.” When so much around us is changing, remembering that we still have a say in what happens next really matters. Out now on all platforms. Let me know what you think of this one in the comments ❤️
1:43

How much of your life is being shaped by decisions you don’t realise you’re making? Seth Godin has spent decades trying to understand that question. Seth is one of the most influential thinkers in modern marketing, leadership and creativity. He’s a bestselling author who has written more than 20 books, and when I started my career in marketing, his ideas were everywhere. So sitting down with him felt like a full-circle moment. I wanted to find out why we stay in careers, businesses and relationships we know aren’t working, how to know when quitting is the right decision, and what happens as AI changes the world of work. We discussed things like: - How to know when it’s time to quit. - Why fear, status and belonging shape your choices. - Why AI could change the world more than we expect. - The human skills that could matter more in an AI world. - How to take back control when you feel stuck. One of Seth’s main talking points is that there are forces shaping our decisions that most of us rarely stop to notice. Fear, status, the years or money we’ve already invested, and the systems around us can all make us feel like we have fewer choices than we actually do. What I like about Seth is that he doesn’t tell you what decision to make. He helps you see what is influencing that decision so you can make it for yourself. With AI changing so quickly, I think the ability to adapt, question the path you’re on and know when to change direction is going to matter more than ever. Seth said something that I think sits at the heart of this entire conversation: “We still get to decide.” When so much around us is changing, remembering that we still have a say in what happens next really matters. Out now on all platforms. Let me know what you think of this one in the comments ❤️

Steven Bartlett

45,389 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

SUNDAR PICHAI: AI IS REWRITING EARTH’S INFRASTRUCTURE IN TWO YEARS Sundar laid it out with quiet certainty: the AI boom isn’t coming, it’s already rewriting the laws of scale: "You know, maybe four years ago Google was spending less than $30 billion per year. This year, that number is gonna be over $90 billion. And if you collectively add what all the companies are doing, we have well over a trillion dollars of investment going in, in building the infrastructure for this moment. And one way I think about it is in the next couple of years, we'll end up building what we probably built in the past 10 to 20 years. So hopefully just in a couple of years. So that gives you the scale at which this is ramping up." It’s the kind of scale that makes empires blink. Alphabet’s AI capex shot from $24 billion in 2021 to over $90 billion in 2025, powered by Gemini, Vertex AI, and an arms race for compute that’s now burning through a trillion dollars across Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta. Source: thewizeai / Sundar Pichai
0:36

SUNDAR PICHAI: AI IS REWRITING EARTH’S INFRASTRUCTURE IN TWO YEARS Sundar laid it out with quiet certainty: the AI boom isn’t coming, it’s already rewriting the laws of scale: "You know, maybe four years ago Google was spending less than $30 billion per year. This year, that number is gonna be over $90 billion. And if you collectively add what all the companies are doing, we have well over a trillion dollars of investment going in, in building the infrastructure for this moment. And one way I think about it is in the next couple of years, we'll end up building what we probably built in the past 10 to 20 years. So hopefully just in a couple of years. So that gives you the scale at which this is ramping up." It’s the kind of scale that makes empires blink. Alphabet’s AI capex shot from $24 billion in 2021 to over $90 billion in 2025, powered by Gemini, Vertex AI, and an arms race for compute that’s now burning through a trillion dollars across Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta. Source: thewizeai / Sundar Pichai

Mario Nawfal

163,412 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Chamath: Frontier AI Leaders “Created a Total F*cking Mess” Short-sighted fearmongering and immaturity from frontier AI leaders has created deep mistrust, threatening AI’s potential as an open engine of economic mobility. That mistrust gives hyperscalers the chance to position themselves as trusted gatekeepers, using KYC, audit trails, and compliance infrastructure to turn AI into an oligopoly. Chamath Palihapitiya on the All-In Pod: “I think the leaders of the frontier labs leave a lot to be desired. I think what we're seeing is a consistent pattern of evasiveness and immaturity, and I think that does a huge disservice to the entire movement of AI. The key to a vibrant life is rooted in economic mobility, and I think AI is the grand leveler. It is the thing that can enable everyone to have unique amounts of economic mobility because they are unencumbered to figure out what their upper bound is. And against that backdrop, we have to live in this constant doomerism, hype cycle, naivety, and I think it holds us back. How does it hold us back? Tactically, number one, it creates mistrust. I think that Silicon Valley was already decaying in the prestige that it held in American society. We built important things. Then we veered away from that, and we started building less important things. And now we're at a point where we've potentially started to rebuild important things again, but we have this veneer of negativity and mistrust that are created in large part because we just cannot get our sh*t together. And the leaders of the frontier labs are public enemy number one. Number two, I think what it creates, which I think is bad, but what it creates is an incredible opportunity for the hyperscalers. And the very simple opportunity is to convince governments all around the world, not just America, that they should be the gatekeeper. A: You can't trust these guys. B: These models are all over the place. C: Let us be the ones that provision them to the world. We will wrap it in KYC. I've been now talking about KYC for a while, right? Who are these customers? Do they have identification? Why are they allowed to run these models? What are they prompting? Let's keep them so that there's an audit trail. All of these things are going to become issues. The Frontier Lab folks made it an issue because of how they've handled all of this up until now. And what does that create? Now that creates an oligopoly for AI, the most powerful economically leveling instrument we've ever seen in the hands of maybe a handful of hyperscalers, who by the way, would make an incredibly compelling argument, and they would be right. And the only counterfactual to it would be, ‘Well, trust us, guys, it should actually be much more open and in a far more distributed environment.’ Can you imagine the cost and the complexity if you ask the neoscaler to build the same robust KYC or the same VPC infrastructure that Amazon and Microsoft and Google have spent decades investing trillions of dollars in? It's an impossibility, Jason. So you can take all of those datacenters off the map. You can take all of the neoscaler market off the map. All of this was preventable. So instead of a diverse, robust, open ecosystem giving a tool that is the fundamental unlock for humans, we are now going to debate gatekeeping and duopoly versus oligopoly. They have created a total f*cking mess, and it's a shame.”
3:26

Chamath: Frontier AI Leaders “Created a Total F*cking Mess” Short-sighted fearmongering and immaturity from frontier AI leaders has created deep mistrust, threatening AI’s potential as an open engine of economic mobility. That mistrust gives hyperscalers the chance to position themselves as trusted gatekeepers, using KYC, audit trails, and compliance infrastructure to turn AI into an oligopoly. Chamath Palihapitiya on the All-In Pod: “I think the leaders of the frontier labs leave a lot to be desired. I think what we're seeing is a consistent pattern of evasiveness and immaturity, and I think that does a huge disservice to the entire movement of AI. The key to a vibrant life is rooted in economic mobility, and I think AI is the grand leveler. It is the thing that can enable everyone to have unique amounts of economic mobility because they are unencumbered to figure out what their upper bound is. And against that backdrop, we have to live in this constant doomerism, hype cycle, naivety, and I think it holds us back. How does it hold us back? Tactically, number one, it creates mistrust. I think that Silicon Valley was already decaying in the prestige that it held in American society. We built important things. Then we veered away from that, and we started building less important things. And now we're at a point where we've potentially started to rebuild important things again, but we have this veneer of negativity and mistrust that are created in large part because we just cannot get our sh*t together. And the leaders of the frontier labs are public enemy number one. Number two, I think what it creates, which I think is bad, but what it creates is an incredible opportunity for the hyperscalers. And the very simple opportunity is to convince governments all around the world, not just America, that they should be the gatekeeper. A: You can't trust these guys. B: These models are all over the place. C: Let us be the ones that provision them to the world. We will wrap it in KYC. I've been now talking about KYC for a while, right? Who are these customers? Do they have identification? Why are they allowed to run these models? What are they prompting? Let's keep them so that there's an audit trail. All of these things are going to become issues. The Frontier Lab folks made it an issue because of how they've handled all of this up until now. And what does that create? Now that creates an oligopoly for AI, the most powerful economically leveling instrument we've ever seen in the hands of maybe a handful of hyperscalers, who by the way, would make an incredibly compelling argument, and they would be right. And the only counterfactual to it would be, ‘Well, trust us, guys, it should actually be much more open and in a far more distributed environment.’ Can you imagine the cost and the complexity if you ask the neoscaler to build the same robust KYC or the same VPC infrastructure that Amazon and Microsoft and Google have spent decades investing trillions of dollars in? It's an impossibility, Jason. So you can take all of those datacenters off the map. You can take all of the neoscaler market off the map. All of this was preventable. So instead of a diverse, robust, open ecosystem giving a tool that is the fundamental unlock for humans, we are now going to debate gatekeeping and duopoly versus oligopoly. They have created a total f*cking mess, and it's a shame.”

The All-In Podcast

142,502 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Zack Polanski, "Why is it so important that any of us speak up for the Palestinians?" Hannah Spencer, "We can see when one group of people is being targeted and dehumanised and oppressed, that can happen to any group" "If our Labour government is so willing to play a part in that it is worrying for us all" "I didn't know about Palestine and Gaza. I felt these issues are so complex they go back so long" "But then I was like, I see what's in front of me, what's happening with my own eyes" "And that's a reason to stand up and say something" "In the council we had a motion about Palestine and Gaza and we got criticism from other parties about it, and people turned up to jeer at us from upstairs. When I stood up people were hissing at me" "And I thought, the feeling I have right now of doing this is absolutely nothing compared to the people in Gaza who are going to sleep under a sky of bombs from the Israeli government" "Of course it is difficult for me but its nothing compared to what other people are suffering" "So much of it is about doing the right thing"
1:56

Zack Polanski, "Why is it so important that any of us speak up for the Palestinians?" Hannah Spencer, "We can see when one group of people is being targeted and dehumanised and oppressed, that can happen to any group" "If our Labour government is so willing to play a part in that it is worrying for us all" "I didn't know about Palestine and Gaza. I felt these issues are so complex they go back so long" "But then I was like, I see what's in front of me, what's happening with my own eyes" "And that's a reason to stand up and say something" "In the council we had a motion about Palestine and Gaza and we got criticism from other parties about it, and people turned up to jeer at us from upstairs. When I stood up people were hissing at me" "And I thought, the feeling I have right now of doing this is absolutely nothing compared to the people in Gaza who are going to sleep under a sky of bombs from the Israeli government" "Of course it is difficult for me but its nothing compared to what other people are suffering" "So much of it is about doing the right thing"

Farrukh

25,917 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Business professor Scott Galloway says China is flooding the world with dirt-cheap AI models on purpose, and it’s wrecking American AI companies faster than cheap Japanese cars ever wrecked Detroit. “Free Chinese models went from less than a third of all traffic in late 2025 to about two-thirds recently.” “They steal the IP on a cell phone tower from Siemens, and then they manufacture it with cheaper labor and they sell it back for 40 cents on the dollar.” “The best business model in history is IP theft.” “What the Chinese automobile industry did to Detroit in about three decades, it feels like Beijing is doing to us in AI frontier models in about three months.”
2:37

Business professor Scott Galloway says China is flooding the world with dirt-cheap AI models on purpose, and it’s wrecking American AI companies faster than cheap Japanese cars ever wrecked Detroit. “Free Chinese models went from less than a third of all traffic in late 2025 to about two-thirds recently.” “They steal the IP on a cell phone tower from Siemens, and then they manufacture it with cheaper labor and they sell it back for 40 cents on the dollar.” “The best business model in history is IP theft.” “What the Chinese automobile industry did to Detroit in about three decades, it feels like Beijing is doing to us in AI frontier models in about three months.”

ileri 𖣂

125,819 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”
2:56

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

DogeDesigner

64,434 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

AI models pushing the frontier are a growing challenge for cybersecurity. A few weeks ago, I asked Demis what's underhyped in AI right now and on his mind: "I'm very excited about this new agentic era and you can see us leaning into that" "But of course we've also gotta think about the security side of that, too" "You're seeing it a little bit with the cyber worries about some of the models, and I think that's just the beginning of some of the issues that we need to make sure we guard against" "So I think that's playing a little bit on my mind. Maybe this is the time now to try and push some standards and maybe international cooperation"
0:55

AI models pushing the frontier are a growing challenge for cybersecurity. A few weeks ago, I asked Demis what's underhyped in AI right now and on his mind: "I'm very excited about this new agentic era and you can see us leaning into that" "But of course we've also gotta think about the security side of that, too" "You're seeing it a little bit with the cyber worries about some of the models, and I think that's just the beginning of some of the issues that we need to make sure we guard against" "So I think that's playing a little bit on my mind. Maybe this is the time now to try and push some standards and maybe international cooperation"

Rowan Cheung

36,216 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

$GOOG Koray Kavukcuoglu says he is 100% certain Google DeepMind will get back to the frontier and that nothing else is more important "To put it very bluntly, there's nothing other than being at the frontier that is important for us. Yeah, that's it. All our goals, all our focus is always about that." "And when we are making decisions, when we are making prioritizations in terms of ideas, in terms of what to do and what goals we should follow, it's all about being at the frontier." "And I'm a hundred percent certain that we will be at the frontier." " We have an amazing team. I have so much trust in the team. There's like a great amount of creativity and dedication in the team, and being part of Google, we have amazing, amazing resources available to us. We have the whole full stack that we can, and we are able to optimize to be able to achieve our goals." ________ For a deeper look at Gemini 4 progression across multiple Google exec interviews:
0:51

$GOOG Koray Kavukcuoglu says he is 100% certain Google DeepMind will get back to the frontier and that nothing else is more important "To put it very bluntly, there's nothing other than being at the frontier that is important for us. Yeah, that's it. All our goals, all our focus is always about that." "And when we are making decisions, when we are making prioritizations in terms of ideas, in terms of what to do and what goals we should follow, it's all about being at the frontier." "And I'm a hundred percent certain that we will be at the frontier." " We have an amazing team. I have so much trust in the team. There's like a great amount of creativity and dedication in the team, and being part of Google, we have amazing, amazing resources available to us. We have the whole full stack that we can, and we are able to optimize to be able to achieve our goals." ________ For a deeper look at Gemini 4 progression across multiple Google exec interviews:

Fireside Alpha

72,195 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Jeff Dean says he's bullish on specialized hardware because a handful of workloads will be a lot of the world's compute "I'm pretty bullish on more and more specialized hardware, because I think that's the way you really get much more efficient systems." "And we now have workloads where there's like a handful of workloads that are going to be a lot of the compute in the world." "And so if you think about that, that is crying out for specialization." "The problem with specialization is if what you want to do changes in the future, then the thing you've lovingly crafted in hardware for maybe two years is no longer perhaps as relevant."
0:35

Jeff Dean says he's bullish on specialized hardware because a handful of workloads will be a lot of the world's compute "I'm pretty bullish on more and more specialized hardware, because I think that's the way you really get much more efficient systems." "And we now have workloads where there's like a handful of workloads that are going to be a lot of the compute in the world." "And so if you think about that, that is crying out for specialization." "The problem with specialization is if what you want to do changes in the future, then the thing you've lovingly crafted in hardware for maybe two years is no longer perhaps as relevant."

Fireside Alpha

37,058 просмотров • 6 дней назад

James Cameron & Arnold Schwarzenegger on people becoming slaves to machines: "Cameron: People always ask me, “Do you think the machines will ever win? You think the machines will ever beat us?” I say, “They beat us a long time ago.” Just look around when you’re in a public place and how many people are riveted to their phone. We’re already slaves of the machines created by people in Silicon Valley to get rich, to tap into human behavior. And now nobody is complete without their cell phone. I mean something that we couldn’t even imagine thirty or forty years ago, we can’t imagine not having it with us. It’s become a part of us. I actually think we’re co-evolving with our machines. We’re changing. Schwarzenegger: I think people are now glued to the machines. I mean through the iPhones or mobile phones in general, iPads and whatever it is. Every second there’s new news out there or new information. In the old days, the routine was to get up in the morning, coffee, get the newspaper. You read the newspaper. Your favorite section of news, sports. Cameron: Our kids would not even understand what that was. The kids are blank slates. They’re just adapting, they’re co-evolving with the machines. We’re so willing to give away all of our powers, all of the things that we used to do, all of our skills and everything, to a machine to do for us, that if you just progressed that out over time, we might give them everything to do. And then what’s left for us? What’s left for us to be human? Schwarzenegger: I think this is a challenge of the new generation. It’s not the challenge for me because I still love to drive. I like to do all this stuff myself. I come from the old school, but I think the newer generation, you’re absolutely right. It is a big challenge, and what do we develop because of that? They’re becoming vegetables in some ways. I don’t know." ("James Cameron's Story of Science Fiction", 2018) Clip From: Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) Director: James Cameron P.S: Happy 72nd birthday, James Cameron!
1:31

James Cameron & Arnold Schwarzenegger on people becoming slaves to machines: "Cameron: People always ask me, “Do you think the machines will ever win? You think the machines will ever beat us?” I say, “They beat us a long time ago.” Just look around when you’re in a public place and how many people are riveted to their phone. We’re already slaves of the machines created by people in Silicon Valley to get rich, to tap into human behavior. And now nobody is complete without their cell phone. I mean something that we couldn’t even imagine thirty or forty years ago, we can’t imagine not having it with us. It’s become a part of us. I actually think we’re co-evolving with our machines. We’re changing. Schwarzenegger: I think people are now glued to the machines. I mean through the iPhones or mobile phones in general, iPads and whatever it is. Every second there’s new news out there or new information. In the old days, the routine was to get up in the morning, coffee, get the newspaper. You read the newspaper. Your favorite section of news, sports. Cameron: Our kids would not even understand what that was. The kids are blank slates. They’re just adapting, they’re co-evolving with the machines. We’re so willing to give away all of our powers, all of the things that we used to do, all of our skills and everything, to a machine to do for us, that if you just progressed that out over time, we might give them everything to do. And then what’s left for us? What’s left for us to be human? Schwarzenegger: I think this is a challenge of the new generation. It’s not the challenge for me because I still love to drive. I like to do all this stuff myself. I come from the old school, but I think the newer generation, you’re absolutely right. It is a big challenge, and what do we develop because of that? They’re becoming vegetables in some ways. I don’t know." ("James Cameron's Story of Science Fiction", 2018) Clip From: Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) Director: James Cameron P.S: Happy 72nd birthday, James Cameron!

DepressedBergman

16,742 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

‼️JUST NOW — powerful brief remarks by the leaders of Ukraine, the UK, France, and Germany in London: IN SHORT: Merz: “The coming days could be decisive for all of us. The destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. Nobody should doubt our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side.” Macron: "I think we have a lot of cards in our hands." Zelenskyy: "Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians." Starmer: "If there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. Matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine." FULL STATEMENTS: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer: "But the principles remain, the principles that we've operated on for a very, very long time, which is that we stand with Ukraine, and if there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. And that's why it's so important, that we repeatedly set out the principle forward that matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine. And we stand here to support you in the conflict and support you in the negotiations and make sure that this is a just and lasting settlement if we can get that far. You're very welcome for our discussions". President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy: "Thank you very much, Kir. Thank you for organizing this meeting. Thank you, friends, Emmanuel and Friedrich, and thank you for our joint meeting. I think that it is very important now to organize such a meeting and discuss very sensitive issues regarding these talks that we had, in the United States and between us. Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians. I think there are lot of what we have to discuss and speak about. So there are a lot of things which are very important for today. I think, unity between Europe and Ukraine, and also unity between Europe, Ukraine, and the U.S. There are some things which we can't manage without Americans, things which we can't manage without Europe, and that's why we need to make some important decisions". President of France Emmanuel Macron: "And thank you Volodymyr for being with us. You are always welcome. In France, I think we all support Ukraine, and we all support peace. And peace negotiations to have sustainable, robust peace. And I think we have a lot of cards in our hands. The financing and the quality of equipments and training programs to Ukraine, the fact that Ukraine is resisting in this war, and the fact that the Russian economy is starting to suffer, especially after our latest sanctions and the US sanctions. And now I think the main issue is the convergence between our common positions, Europeans and Ukrainians, and the U.S. to finalize these, peace negotiations and re-engage in a new phase in the best possible conditions for Ukraine, for the Europeans, and for our collective security". Chancellor of Germany Friedrich Merz: "I highly appreciate that we are having the opportunity to see you, Volodymyr, together with Emmanuel, and talking about the upcoming days, because this could be a decisive time for all of us. We are trying to continue our support for Ukraine, as you know. On the other hand, we are seeing these talks and negotiations in Moscow and in the U.S. I'm looking forward to hear from you what the outcome of these talks might be. And we are still and remain strongly behind Ukraine and giving support to your country, because we all know that the destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. So that's the reason why we are here, trying to figure out what we can do. And nobody should doubt on our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. And the outcome is open. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side, but we have to talk about that. That's why we are here".
4:00

‼️JUST NOW — powerful brief remarks by the leaders of Ukraine, the UK, France, and Germany in London: IN SHORT: Merz: “The coming days could be decisive for all of us. The destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. Nobody should doubt our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side.” Macron: "I think we have a lot of cards in our hands." Zelenskyy: "Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians." Starmer: "If there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. Matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine." FULL STATEMENTS: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer: "But the principles remain, the principles that we've operated on for a very, very long time, which is that we stand with Ukraine, and if there's to be a ceasefire, it needs to be a just and lasting ceasefire. And that's why it's so important, that we repeatedly set out the principle forward that matters about Ukraine are for Ukraine. And we stand here to support you in the conflict and support you in the negotiations and make sure that this is a just and lasting settlement if we can get that far. You're very welcome for our discussions". President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy: "Thank you very much, Kir. Thank you for organizing this meeting. Thank you, friends, Emmanuel and Friedrich, and thank you for our joint meeting. I think that it is very important now to organize such a meeting and discuss very sensitive issues regarding these talks that we had, in the United States and between us. Our team came back, and I think that they will brief us about the last talks with Americans and after talks of Americans with Russians. I think there are lot of what we have to discuss and speak about. So there are a lot of things which are very important for today. I think, unity between Europe and Ukraine, and also unity between Europe, Ukraine, and the U.S. There are some things which we can't manage without Americans, things which we can't manage without Europe, and that's why we need to make some important decisions". President of France Emmanuel Macron: "And thank you Volodymyr for being with us. You are always welcome. In France, I think we all support Ukraine, and we all support peace. And peace negotiations to have sustainable, robust peace. And I think we have a lot of cards in our hands. The financing and the quality of equipments and training programs to Ukraine, the fact that Ukraine is resisting in this war, and the fact that the Russian economy is starting to suffer, especially after our latest sanctions and the US sanctions. And now I think the main issue is the convergence between our common positions, Europeans and Ukrainians, and the U.S. to finalize these, peace negotiations and re-engage in a new phase in the best possible conditions for Ukraine, for the Europeans, and for our collective security". Chancellor of Germany Friedrich Merz: "I highly appreciate that we are having the opportunity to see you, Volodymyr, together with Emmanuel, and talking about the upcoming days, because this could be a decisive time for all of us. We are trying to continue our support for Ukraine, as you know. On the other hand, we are seeing these talks and negotiations in Moscow and in the U.S. I'm looking forward to hear from you what the outcome of these talks might be. And we are still and remain strongly behind Ukraine and giving support to your country, because we all know that the destiny of this country is the destiny of Europe. So that's the reason why we are here, trying to figure out what we can do. And nobody should doubt on our support for Ukraine. And this is what we are firmly standing behind. And the outcome is open. I'm skeptical about some of the details which we are seeing in the documents coming from the U.S. side, but we have to talk about that. That's why we are here".

Kateryna Lisunova

373,089 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Sam Altman: AI models need their own device so they can stay with you and understand the context of your life. “The iPhone is currently the greatest piece of consumer hardware ever made.” “But it was not meant for a world where you needed hardware that could absorb all the context of your life.” “My phone is in my pocket, and it’s not gonna understand us.” “I would like a device that can participate, understand, and know about this conversation.” “And OpenAI is committed to building something along those lines.”
1:04

Sam Altman: AI models need their own device so they can stay with you and understand the context of your life. “The iPhone is currently the greatest piece of consumer hardware ever made.” “But it was not meant for a world where you needed hardware that could absorb all the context of your life.” “My phone is in my pocket, and it’s not gonna understand us.” “I would like a device that can participate, understand, and know about this conversation.” “And OpenAI is committed to building something along those lines.”

Veee

56,171 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Here is: A Muslim woman issues a warning to every single American: The very terrorists she fled from in Egypt are now leading protests right here in on American soil. They are members of the Muslim Brotherhood. “It’s like déjà vu for me: everything is happening, but now in the United States.” “I came here expecting that I had left the bad guys behind. But unfortunately, what I found here is that the bad guys are already here, and they include many of the people I knew 15 or 20 years ago, when I was an undergraduate student. Now they are leading the protests happening all over the country. I know they are members of the Muslim Brotherhood, although many of them deny it. They even organized the protestors in the same manner as they did back then—15 or 20 years ago—the same way of mobilization, the same flags, the same narrative, even the same reliance on Al Jazeera footage and news stories. It’s like déjà vu for me: everything is happening, but now in the United States. That’s why I’m here today, hoping that we can find a way to prevent what happened in my home country, Egypt, from happening here in the United States.”
1:22

Here is: A Muslim woman issues a warning to every single American: The very terrorists she fled from in Egypt are now leading protests right here in on American soil. They are members of the Muslim Brotherhood. “It’s like déjà vu for me: everything is happening, but now in the United States.” “I came here expecting that I had left the bad guys behind. But unfortunately, what I found here is that the bad guys are already here, and they include many of the people I knew 15 or 20 years ago, when I was an undergraduate student. Now they are leading the protests happening all over the country. I know they are members of the Muslim Brotherhood, although many of them deny it. They even organized the protestors in the same manner as they did back then—15 or 20 years ago—the same way of mobilization, the same flags, the same narrative, even the same reliance on Al Jazeera footage and news stories. It’s like déjà vu for me: everything is happening, but now in the United States. That’s why I’m here today, hoping that we can find a way to prevent what happened in my home country, Egypt, from happening here in the United States.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

64,238 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад