A double blind placebo trial is how safety gets established for a pharmaceutical product. You take ten thousand people, five thousand get the drug, five thousand get a placebo, which by definition should have no effect on the body. For an injectable product, that placebo should be saline. It's... called double blind because neither the scientists running the study or the patients receiving it know who got which one, and that distinction matters because those scientists are being paid by the drug company the entire time. That is the standard for every drug, every cancer treatment, every product we put in our bodies. Except one. One of the things I've proven through years of lawsuits with our nonprofit is that not a single childhood vaccine on the schedule has ever gone through that process. None of them. That is the core of my entire issue with this. Of everything you could rush to market without proving it safe first, why would it be the product given to a perfectly healthy child?show more

A major provision in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 was a safety report from HHS to congress every two years starting 1988. They never did. 38 years! @SecKennedy @AaronSiriSG @delbigtree won the lawsuit proving it. The NCVIA must be repealed!

I did a double blind flu vaccine as a participant years ago. it was through Ford Motor Company and the CDC. I was actually injected with the saline. They gave a thermometer and we had instructions to take temp Everytime you felt sick and report over the season. When we finally got the results, the flu vaccine did nothing. However, the CDC still recommended the vaccine for those that were over 65... The year was about 1996ish.

There is not a single vaccine on the childhood schedule that has been tested against a saline placebo. Not one. Yet we allow doctors to inject these pharmaceutical products into our babies. The industry has no liability if they kill or maim our children.

This starts with a false premise. Saline-placebo RCTs are NOT required for “every drug and cancer treatment.” Active-control trials are routine when an effective treatment already exists. And the claim that childhood vaccines have never undergone blinded placebo-controlled trials is demonstrably false. The legitimate debate is whether particular vaccines should have used saline controls, not whether vaccine safety testing somehow never happened. The Vaccine Placebo Claim: We Checked the Viral ICAN Chart

Even double blind placebo studies are subject to variables, however, that is their gold standard and they don’t follow it fo vaccines

It depends on what you are targeting. You can't withdraw an existing safe and effective treatment for a placebo. It'd be like testing a new parachute and making the control group a knapsack.

Wrong. A far better clinical trial is vaccine vs nothing, which was done in the 50s/60s/70s.

However, the 5000 year-old art of Chinese acupuncture is still "unproven" because they don't use double blind testing.

And - how to unblind a study. Remove the adjuvant. So not even local reactions occur. So much else wrong with Del but seriously.

In the recent studies of the Vaxelis, 6 infants died who received Vaxelis. Only 1 died in the control group. Who is responsible for the deaths?

Of all the things that are rushed to market, why WHY would it be a product given to a healthy child?

never happens

The trials data is all made up by the Pharma companies. Let FDA do the trials, the whole Pharma industry will come crashing down.

And mandated, these mother f******’ers

Clearly he doesn't know the first thing about mRNA technology.

Because a sick child is a lifetime cash cow for pharma is the only reasonable answer

You idiots might want to check history. 100 years ago millions died of measles, now they don’t. There is not one study that definitely shows vax injury is anything than very rare. Period.

This should horrify every parent who calls themselves responsible

👍🏻

What about the Danish MMR trials in 2019? @delbigtree

Amen

I think there are plenty of parents who are already marginal on the issue that would volunteer for a real study to settle it for good

God bless Del for stating these facts ☝️

Since you cant get sued pharma may as well put rat poison in the vaccines. Who cares.

@Hammarlin forska!

@delbigtree is the man.

Del you know why. That's the creation and foundation of the customer base in the sick-care industry. They have to create life-long customers at birth.

Plus, for injuries or deaths caused by their products, the vaccine manufacturers were granted federal immunity from any legal liability.

Well people think their body is lacking lizard spit, so color me surprised

Because satanists are in charge of Pharma.

I disagree with your first sentence. Safety is NEVER established for a pharmaceutical product.

Wise and morally good words.

That’s always been my question. When they talk about side effects of placebo versus drug, why are there reported side effects from a placebo? I participated in a drug trial once. It felt like I was being encouraged to give certain answers over others using leading questions. It was a dyspepsia study. The drug was approved then un-approved. Can’t recall the name.