Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
💉Not a single routine injected childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule has ever been licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial. When another vaccine was used as the control, that vaccine was also never licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial. Every product on the schedule traces back through a chain... show more
39,831 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)
31 Comments

This is a flat-out lie. For instance, nine of the vaccines currently on the childhood vaccine schedule were tested against inert placebo. The remainder were tested against proven safe vaccines that earlier underwent trials with placebos. Example:

You're lying, but let's pretend that you aren't. Please provide 1 example of when the incidence rate of an adverse event in the trial meant that a vaccine should not have been approved and, if a true placebo control had been utilized, a different decision would have been reached. Just 1 clear example where the comparison to something other than a true placebo meant that an unsafe vaccine was approved.

Wrong. The vaccines are based on trials of the antigens over many decades. Also, cohort studies over decades looking at millions of children, comparing vaxxed to unvaxxed show the benefits of vaxes outweigh the harms. 1/2

✅💯 Additional confirmation and information by Dr Sherri Tenpenny.

Turtles All The Way Down

This is lawyerly wordplay masquerading as epidemiology. The FDA’s own VARIVAX insert states that its efficacy was established through a "placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial" involving 491 vaccinated children and 465 placebo recipients. During the first year, 8.5% of the placebo group contracted chickenpox, compared with none of the vaccinated group. VARIVAX is injected and is part of the childhood schedule. One documented counterexample is sufficient to demolish a supposedly "categorical fact". The wider insinuation is equally dishonest. When an effective vaccine already exists, researchers normally compare a replacement against that vaccine rather than deliberately leaving children unprotected. That is elementary research ethics, not evidence of some ancestral chain of untested products. Placebo trials also cannot detect extremely rare effects without implausibly enormous samples, which is why clinical trials are supplemented by continuing population-level safety surveillance. "Read chapter 10 of my book" is not an answer to the FDA documents. Apparently, neither is reading them accurately.

This is such important and eye-opening information. @AaronSiriSG ’s persistence in getting the actual documents is truly admirable. Thank you for sharing this, transparency like this matters.🙌

You are wrong. Placebo-controlled: For decades, U.S. law has required vaccines (and all other medications) to be tested in a manner that enables us to learn about the intervention, such as by comparing the potential product (i.e., vaccine) against a placebo.

Significant. Japan I believe does not vaccinate until age 2. Next to no SIDS. If all kids get jabbed as babies, the destruction of their brain may start before milestones are reached

Del Bigtree has been trying to report this like 20yrs ago!!!! Only now, that big pharma no longer controls the world, is the TRUTH finally getting out!!!

This is much more urgent issue

Parachutes were never tested against placebo controls, probably that means there are no evidences of parachutes working: that's the scientific level of this discussion.

Poisons begin early by legal inversion. Humans are Sovereign, these are the initial incursions of body sovereignty. Positive Law inverts Natural Law, Human Sovereignty. For context in Natural Law read, Aquinas, Locke, Bastiat, Finnis... Articles of Confederation not followed.🧐

How long will it take people in the west to see the depths of the murderous corruption of its Vaccine and Medical industry? Those in the eastern world get it. They’ll never touch the stuff. All this so powerful people can make money and control your life. Horrific.

It was always about the money Big Pharma can steal from the American people. Always.

@harryfisherEMTP @Answers4Sean

"there is little evidence for significant effect estimate differences between observational studies and RCTs"

He's technically correct, not a single one, they've all been tested.

@TranslateMom english spanish

Grok versus placebo

GOOD it the work of those of INTEGRITY,those of a "SPIRITUAL -CENTERED MORALISM"!!!You BLESS yourself as you bless/serve/EMPOWER others!❕️♒️☪️♒️☪️♒️⚪️⚪️⚪️🙂😌🌌

Pure insanity.

Turtles all the way down

Isso tem que ser divulgado

INSANE

With Spanish captions:

@HeyGen english spanish

🎉

Presented as a gotcha but it's clinical research ethics. You don't give children placebos when effective vaccines already exist. Just saying ;)

Thank you

Has he done any work on measles?
