Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

👀 A hidden secret comes to light, leading to an unexpected bond between two classmates... 🎬 Anal Mania Otaku to Ananii Daisuki na Ojou-sama – Episode 1 English 🔗 #hentai #hanime #hentaivídeo #hentaisub #anal

HentaiAstra

39,184 subscribers

204,865 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #hentai #hanime #hentaivídeo #hentaisub #anal

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Based on a remarkable true story, two African-American entrepreneurs found a way to beat a system designed to keep them out. 💼🔥 Using a white front man, they quietly built an empire...but how long can a secret that big stay hidden? 👀🎬 Movie: The Banker

Based on a remarkable true story, two African-American entrepreneurs found a way to beat a system designed to keep them out. 💼🔥 Using a white front man, they quietly built an empire...but how long can a secret that big stay hidden? 👀🎬 Movie: The Banker

21 Clipz🪖

20,267 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

[eyesmag] -Instagram Update- The stars of this episode of 72-Minute Blind Date are Ryu Jeongran and Roh Jisun 💗 This was an unexpected pairing that turned into nothing less than a clash of the spear and the shield. 🏹 Ryu Jeongran managed to completely break down the defenses of Roh Jisun, who wouldn't budge in the face of any flirting. And in return, Roh Jisun had Ryu Jeongran laughing uncontrollably at her own playful charm 🪽 What did the two talk about during their 72 minutes together? ✨ If you're curious about the fresh chemistry between these two first time partners, watch the full episode now on the Eyes Magazine YouTube channel! 🎥 🔗 #노지선 #RohJisun

[eyesmag] -Instagram Update- The stars of this episode of 72-Minute Blind Date are Ryu Jeongran and Roh Jisun 💗 This was an unexpected pairing that turned into nothing less than a clash of the spear and the shield. 🏹 Ryu Jeongran managed to completely break down the defenses of Roh Jisun, who wouldn't budge in the face of any flirting. And in return, Roh Jisun had Ryu Jeongran laughing uncontrollably at her own playful charm 🪽 What did the two talk about during their 72 minutes together? ✨ If you're curious about the fresh chemistry between these two first time partners, watch the full episode now on the Eyes Magazine YouTube channel! 🎥 🔗 #노지선 #RohJisun

Ponyo 🍀🍊

18,882 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

This war has given China a green light, and what comes next could make the Iran conflict look like a warm-up... David Pyne, Fmr. U.S. Army Officer and Nat'l Security Expert, doesn't think this pause is the "end," he thinks it's the setup for something FAR more dangerous: Trump has now cancelled strikes on Iran twice in a week, each time after ordering full war preparations. Israel is reportedly furious, and Pyne's read is Trump cannot decide between being a neocon and being a realist, bouncing between the two with no coherent exit. Before February 28th, Iran had ordered its proxies NOT to attack U.S. forces, they were contained. Now, they fire ballistic missiles at U.S. troops in Jordan and restart the war every time Trump offers an olive branch. As far as China's concerned, the U.S. is ALREADY below 50% of pre-war missile stockpiles, China has a 10-to-1 ship advantage in the Taiwan Strait and a far greater missile advantage still, and Pyne anticipates a Chinese move on Taiwan by NEXT OCTOBER. "This war has basically been one big green light for China to make a big move..." Appreciate your insights, David Pyne 🇺🇸

This war has given China a green light, and what comes next could make the Iran conflict look like a warm-up... David Pyne, Fmr. U.S. Army Officer and Nat'l Security Expert, doesn't think this pause is the "end," he thinks it's the setup for something FAR more dangerous: Trump has now cancelled strikes on Iran twice in a week, each time after ordering full war preparations. Israel is reportedly furious, and Pyne's read is Trump cannot decide between being a neocon and being a realist, bouncing between the two with no coherent exit. Before February 28th, Iran had ordered its proxies NOT to attack U.S. forces, they were contained. Now, they fire ballistic missiles at U.S. troops in Jordan and restart the war every time Trump offers an olive branch. As far as China's concerned, the U.S. is ALREADY below 50% of pre-war missile stockpiles, China has a 10-to-1 ship advantage in the Taiwan Strait and a far greater missile advantage still, and Pyne anticipates a Chinese move on Taiwan by NEXT OCTOBER. "This war has basically been one big green light for China to make a big move..." Appreciate your insights, David Pyne 🇺🇸

Mario Nawfal

227,571 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

I keep coming back to this question: Are you willing to sprint when the distance is unknown? In 2021, Georgia Tech strength coach Lewis Caralla delivered this epic speech to the football team. If it doesn’t light a fire under you, check your pulse… He starts with a series of brutal truths: • Winning isn’t loyal to you • Winning doesn’t care about you • Winning doesn’t care how sore you are • Winning doesn’t care how hard you work • Winning doesn’t care how much sleep you’ve had But then comes the line that hit me: Are you willing to sprint when the distance is unknown? That mindset is rare. It demands two things: 1. An unshakable belief in yourself 2. A deep conviction in the mission If you have one without the other, you won’t last. You need both. From what I’ve seen, the greatest things in life are built by people willing to sprint when they can’t see the finish line: The sprint to support loved ones when they need you most. The sprint to create something meaningful. The sprint to serve others and leave a lasting mark. Your task: Identify those rare pursuits worth sprinting for when the finish line is hidden. That, to me, is what winning really is. "And why chase winning? Because the only thing that's guaranteed in life if you don't chase it is losing."

I keep coming back to this question: Are you willing to sprint when the distance is unknown? In 2021, Georgia Tech strength coach Lewis Caralla delivered this epic speech to the football team. If it doesn’t light a fire under you, check your pulse… He starts with a series of brutal truths: • Winning isn’t loyal to you • Winning doesn’t care about you • Winning doesn’t care how sore you are • Winning doesn’t care how hard you work • Winning doesn’t care how much sleep you’ve had But then comes the line that hit me: Are you willing to sprint when the distance is unknown? That mindset is rare. It demands two things: 1. An unshakable belief in yourself 2. A deep conviction in the mission If you have one without the other, you won’t last. You need both. From what I’ve seen, the greatest things in life are built by people willing to sprint when they can’t see the finish line: The sprint to support loved ones when they need you most. The sprint to create something meaningful. The sprint to serve others and leave a lasting mark. Your task: Identify those rare pursuits worth sprinting for when the finish line is hidden. That, to me, is what winning really is. "And why chase winning? Because the only thing that's guaranteed in life if you don't chase it is losing."

Sahil Bloom

270,769 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference. 2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording… then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3. Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

16,608 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🎬Danqing Season | [Danqing Trails & Inkshade: Painting Loong] New Levels Unlock Ink mist churning, mysterious happenings unfold. Artist Nikki ventures deep into the Danqing Realm, her pursuit weaving through swirling ink. At last, she glimpses the secret buried deep within the Ink Pool. The Loong Pagoda slowly emerges through the mist—an unseen journey quietly begins to take shape. 🖌New Gameplay Feature "Danqing Trails" During the event, stylists can journey through four sets of linked landscape paintings within the Danqing Realm, each leading to a distinct Painting Realm. Explore these mysterious scenes and find your way out of the realms. 🖌Brace for "Inkshade: Painting Loong" As you step into the Loong Pagoda, the Painting Loong's scales and claws gently stir, and its inked form slowly comes to life from the scroll. Chapter II of the exclusive quest "Ink-Woven Tales" is now available! Stylists will face the final challenge of Danqing Season, battling the Painting Loong in a breathtaking confrontation between reality and illusion. During the fight, hidden fragments of memory will gradually unlock, revealing forgotten moments of the past that await your discovery. —— The Coziest Open-World Game! Infinity Nikki Version 1.8 "Danqing Season" launches globally on July 29 (UTC-7)! ➤ Download Now: ➤ Join us on Facebook Group: #InfinityNikki

🎬Danqing Season | [Danqing Trails & Inkshade: Painting Loong] New Levels Unlock Ink mist churning, mysterious happenings unfold. Artist Nikki ventures deep into the Danqing Realm, her pursuit weaving through swirling ink. At last, she glimpses the secret buried deep within the Ink Pool. The Loong Pagoda slowly emerges through the mist—an unseen journey quietly begins to take shape. 🖌New Gameplay Feature "Danqing Trails" During the event, stylists can journey through four sets of linked landscape paintings within the Danqing Realm, each leading to a distinct Painting Realm. Explore these mysterious scenes and find your way out of the realms. 🖌Brace for "Inkshade: Painting Loong" As you step into the Loong Pagoda, the Painting Loong's scales and claws gently stir, and its inked form slowly comes to life from the scroll. Chapter II of the exclusive quest "Ink-Woven Tales" is now available! Stylists will face the final challenge of Danqing Season, battling the Painting Loong in a breathtaking confrontation between reality and illusion. During the fight, hidden fragments of memory will gradually unlock, revealing forgotten moments of the past that await your discovery. —— The Coziest Open-World Game! Infinity Nikki Version 1.8 "Danqing Season" launches globally on July 29 (UTC-7)! ➤ Download Now: ➤ Join us on Facebook Group: #InfinityNikki

Infinity Nikki

28,673 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

As Euphoria Season 3 Episode 6 comes out today, let’s take a moment to appreciate Season 2 Episode 6 — easily one of the most beautiful episodes in the entire series. Not because of chaos. Not because of shock value. But because, for a brief moment, the show remembered how to feel human. The scene between Fezco and Lexi Howard with “Stand By Me” playing in the background felt almost unreal in the best way possible. Two lonely people finding comfort in each other without forcing it, without manipulation, without toxicity. Just silence, eye contact, awkward smiles, and genuine connection. Scientifically, that scene worked because it triggered emotional familiarity. The slow pacing, the pauses, the nostalgic music — all of it activated the part of the brain connected to attachment and memory. While every other relationship in the show felt chaotic and destructive, Fez and Lexi felt safe. What made the moment even more special was how unexpected it was. Nobody watched Euphoria expecting the softest and most emotionally mature relationship to come from a quiet drug dealer and an overlooked girl who spent most of her life in the background. Yet somehow, they understood each other better than anyone else in the show ever could. And maybe that’s why the moment stayed with so many people. In a show built around emotional destruction, they accidentally became peace. #Euphoria

As Euphoria Season 3 Episode 6 comes out today, let’s take a moment to appreciate Season 2 Episode 6 — easily one of the most beautiful episodes in the entire series. Not because of chaos. Not because of shock value. But because, for a brief moment, the show remembered how to feel human. The scene between Fezco and Lexi Howard with “Stand By Me” playing in the background felt almost unreal in the best way possible. Two lonely people finding comfort in each other without forcing it, without manipulation, without toxicity. Just silence, eye contact, awkward smiles, and genuine connection. Scientifically, that scene worked because it triggered emotional familiarity. The slow pacing, the pauses, the nostalgic music — all of it activated the part of the brain connected to attachment and memory. While every other relationship in the show felt chaotic and destructive, Fez and Lexi felt safe. What made the moment even more special was how unexpected it was. Nobody watched Euphoria expecting the softest and most emotionally mature relationship to come from a quiet drug dealer and an overlooked girl who spent most of her life in the background. Yet somehow, they understood each other better than anyone else in the show ever could. And maybe that’s why the moment stayed with so many people. In a show built around emotional destruction, they accidentally became peace. #Euphoria

Chewbacca🇬🇧

454,304 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

‼️BOMBSHELL: From a Burn Barrel DEATH to Butler to Charlie Kirk: Candace Owens Exposes the PETN Explosive Connection 👀 Candace Owens Just Connected the Dots: The Same Explosive (PETN) Linked to a Mysterious Death in Pennsylvania, the Butler Assassination Attempt, Israel’s Pager Attacks… and Potentially Charlie Kirk’s Murder Candace Owens dropped a chilling timeline tonight that starts in August 2022 in Kittanning, Pennsylvania. A 48-year-old man named Mark Leady, who worked with explosives (specifically PETN) at an oil and gas company, died in what was called a “freak accident” when something exploded in his burn barrel, sending shrapnel into his neck. His best friend, Corey Comperatore, didn’t fully buy the official story. Mark had allegedly confessed to him just a week earlier that he had stolen explosives from work. The ATF was reportedly investigating him. Fast forward to July 13, 2024 — just 30 minutes away in Butler, Pennsylvania. Corey Comperatore is killed at Trump’s rally while shielding his family. A mysterious woman had upgraded him and his family to front-row seats. Two months later, Israel carries out the pager attacks in Lebanon using PETN explosives hidden inside devices — the same explosive Mark Leady had access to. Then in February 2025, Netanyahu gifts Trump a golden pager — a not-so-subtle nod to that operation. Candace is now asking the obvious question: Is there a connection between these events? Between the explosive used in Butler, the one used in the pager attacks, and the theory that PETN was used in Charlie Kirk’s assassination? She also pointed out that Trump seemed satisfied with the Butler investigation and wanted it shut down — while Corey Comperatore’s widow still has serious unanswered questions. This is no longer just about one suspicious assassination. This is about a potential pattern. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The coincidences are getting harder to ignore. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE HERE:

‼️BOMBSHELL: From a Burn Barrel DEATH to Butler to Charlie Kirk: Candace Owens Exposes the PETN Explosive Connection 👀 Candace Owens Just Connected the Dots: The Same Explosive (PETN) Linked to a Mysterious Death in Pennsylvania, the Butler Assassination Attempt, Israel’s Pager Attacks… and Potentially Charlie Kirk’s Murder Candace Owens dropped a chilling timeline tonight that starts in August 2022 in Kittanning, Pennsylvania. A 48-year-old man named Mark Leady, who worked with explosives (specifically PETN) at an oil and gas company, died in what was called a “freak accident” when something exploded in his burn barrel, sending shrapnel into his neck. His best friend, Corey Comperatore, didn’t fully buy the official story. Mark had allegedly confessed to him just a week earlier that he had stolen explosives from work. The ATF was reportedly investigating him. Fast forward to July 13, 2024 — just 30 minutes away in Butler, Pennsylvania. Corey Comperatore is killed at Trump’s rally while shielding his family. A mysterious woman had upgraded him and his family to front-row seats. Two months later, Israel carries out the pager attacks in Lebanon using PETN explosives hidden inside devices — the same explosive Mark Leady had access to. Then in February 2025, Netanyahu gifts Trump a golden pager — a not-so-subtle nod to that operation. Candace is now asking the obvious question: Is there a connection between these events? Between the explosive used in Butler, the one used in the pager attacks, and the theory that PETN was used in Charlie Kirk’s assassination? She also pointed out that Trump seemed satisfied with the Butler investigation and wanted it shut down — while Corey Comperatore’s widow still has serious unanswered questions. This is no longer just about one suspicious assassination. This is about a potential pattern. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT this, and watch her full episode linked below. The coincidences are getting harder to ignore. If you believe in independent journalism and want the truth to keep coming, your support right now is everything. DONATE HERE:

Project Constitution

81,882 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

What does the writing of Katy Perry, Hemingway, and The Bible have in common? Mark Forsyth has the answer. He studied history's greatest writers and noticed how they used the same rhetorical formulas. Here's what you need to know: 1. The formulas are timeless (and still work). 2. Where to begin? Try taking the last word of one sentence and repeating it as the first word in the next. It gives the illusion of logic. Like this one from Yoda: "Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hatred. Hatred leads to suffering." 3. An example from Malcolm X: "Once you change your philosophy, you change your thought pattern. Once you change your thought pattern, you change your attitude. Once you change your attitude, it changes your behavior pattern and then you go on into some action." 4. It's a mystery why, but people love to hear a string of words that begins with the same letter. "Two to Tango" is a heck of a lot more memorable than "Two to Waltz." 5. From his book, Elements of Eloquence: "Adjectives in English absolutely have to be in this order: opinion-size-age-shape-colour-origin-material-purpose Noun." 6. People will tell you to write only what's necessary, but endless repetition can be a way to emphasize something. Katy Perry's repetition of opposites is logically unnecessary, but it works: "'Cause you're hot then you're cold, You're yes then you're no, You're in then you're out, You're up then you're down, You're wrong when it's right, It's black and it's white, We fight, we break up, We kiss, we make up." 7. Wedding vows have the same kind of repetition: "For better or for worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health..." 8. JFK leaned on a rhetorical device called a Chiasmus, where you take the first half of a sentence and say it backward. You see it in sentences like "Mankind must put an end to war—or war will put an end to mankind" and "Ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country." 9. I like the Chiasmus because it's so easy to implement. Here's another example of a Chiasmus, like when Cormac McCarthy wrote: "You forget what you want to remember, and you remember what you want to forget." 10. Language is ruled by the mob. Doesn't matter what the committees think. If everybody uses a word in a certain way, then that's what it means. 11. Most of Shakespeare's famous lines are simply examples of famous formulas. 12. Shakespeare often "stole" content from other people, but he improved what he stole by using rhetorical formulas and figures of speech. Mark insists that he had Thomas North’s translation of Plutarch open while writing Julius Caesar. 13. Write two things that connect, then add a twist for the third thing. The magic comes from the surprise. An example is: "Lies, damned lies, and statistics." Another is: "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." 14. Sometimes, the things that stick will simply surprise you. One of the most famous lines in film history only has three words: "Bond. James Bond." 15. The James Bond-style line is called a Diacope. Other examples are "Burn, baby, burn" and "Zed’s dead, baby, Zed’s dead." If nerding out on beautiful writing is your thing, you will love this episode. By the time you're done listening, you'll have X-ray vision for the English language. I've shared the full interview with Mark Forsyth below. You can also listen on Apple or Spotify, or watch on YouTube. Check the links in the reply tweets.

What does the writing of Katy Perry, Hemingway, and The Bible have in common? Mark Forsyth has the answer. He studied history's greatest writers and noticed how they used the same rhetorical formulas. Here's what you need to know: 1. The formulas are timeless (and still work). 2. Where to begin? Try taking the last word of one sentence and repeating it as the first word in the next. It gives the illusion of logic. Like this one from Yoda: "Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hatred. Hatred leads to suffering." 3. An example from Malcolm X: "Once you change your philosophy, you change your thought pattern. Once you change your thought pattern, you change your attitude. Once you change your attitude, it changes your behavior pattern and then you go on into some action." 4. It's a mystery why, but people love to hear a string of words that begins with the same letter. "Two to Tango" is a heck of a lot more memorable than "Two to Waltz." 5. From his book, Elements of Eloquence: "Adjectives in English absolutely have to be in this order: opinion-size-age-shape-colour-origin-material-purpose Noun." 6. People will tell you to write only what's necessary, but endless repetition can be a way to emphasize something. Katy Perry's repetition of opposites is logically unnecessary, but it works: "'Cause you're hot then you're cold, You're yes then you're no, You're in then you're out, You're up then you're down, You're wrong when it's right, It's black and it's white, We fight, we break up, We kiss, we make up." 7. Wedding vows have the same kind of repetition: "For better or for worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health..." 8. JFK leaned on a rhetorical device called a Chiasmus, where you take the first half of a sentence and say it backward. You see it in sentences like "Mankind must put an end to war—or war will put an end to mankind" and "Ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country." 9. I like the Chiasmus because it's so easy to implement. Here's another example of a Chiasmus, like when Cormac McCarthy wrote: "You forget what you want to remember, and you remember what you want to forget." 10. Language is ruled by the mob. Doesn't matter what the committees think. If everybody uses a word in a certain way, then that's what it means. 11. Most of Shakespeare's famous lines are simply examples of famous formulas. 12. Shakespeare often "stole" content from other people, but he improved what he stole by using rhetorical formulas and figures of speech. Mark insists that he had Thomas North’s translation of Plutarch open while writing Julius Caesar. 13. Write two things that connect, then add a twist for the third thing. The magic comes from the surprise. An example is: "Lies, damned lies, and statistics." Another is: "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." 14. Sometimes, the things that stick will simply surprise you. One of the most famous lines in film history only has three words: "Bond. James Bond." 15. The James Bond-style line is called a Diacope. Other examples are "Burn, baby, burn" and "Zed’s dead, baby, Zed’s dead." If nerding out on beautiful writing is your thing, you will love this episode. By the time you're done listening, you'll have X-ray vision for the English language. I've shared the full interview with Mark Forsyth below. You can also listen on Apple or Spotify, or watch on YouTube. Check the links in the reply tweets.

David Perell

90,497 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Holy hell. Graham Linehan on Triggernometry just explained exactly how entire societies get taken over — using a party game invented in the Soviet Union. It’s called Werewolf. You get a card. Most people are villagers. Two people are werewolves. At “night” everyone closes their eyes. The werewolves silently pick someone to kill. Morning comes. A body is revealed.Then the debate begins: “Who are the secret werewolves among us?” The werewolves lie with perfect confidence. They accuse the loudest truth-tellers. They play the victim. They sow doubt, division, guilt. Villagers start turning on each other. Every day the villagers vote to hang one person. Most of the time… they hang another innocent villager. The werewolves almost always win. The game was created in 1986 by a Moscow psychology student to prove one terrifying thesis: “An uninformed majority will ALWAYS be defeated by a tiny, coordinated minority that shares hidden information and has no problem lying 24/7.” Linehan’s unspoken question hangs in the air: Are we the villagers right now? Who woke up this morning and silently chose the next victim? Watch these 60 seconds. Then look around the room. Full hair-raising episode linked in bio. Sound on.

Holy hell. Graham Linehan on Triggernometry just explained exactly how entire societies get taken over — using a party game invented in the Soviet Union. It’s called Werewolf. You get a card. Most people are villagers. Two people are werewolves. At “night” everyone closes their eyes. The werewolves silently pick someone to kill. Morning comes. A body is revealed.Then the debate begins: “Who are the secret werewolves among us?” The werewolves lie with perfect confidence. They accuse the loudest truth-tellers. They play the victim. They sow doubt, division, guilt. Villagers start turning on each other. Every day the villagers vote to hang one person. Most of the time… they hang another innocent villager. The werewolves almost always win. The game was created in 1986 by a Moscow psychology student to prove one terrifying thesis: “An uninformed majority will ALWAYS be defeated by a tiny, coordinated minority that shares hidden information and has no problem lying 24/7.” Linehan’s unspoken question hangs in the air: Are we the villagers right now? Who woke up this morning and silently chose the next victim? Watch these 60 seconds. Then look around the room. Full hair-raising episode linked in bio. Sound on.

Camus

1,006,157 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

An $800M company exists because evals were so broken that the founder had to build the same internal tool twice, at two different companies, before anyone would pay for it. First at his own startup. Then again leading the AI team at Figma. Same problem both times: teams shipping AI features had no structured way to know if the outputs were getting better or worse. They were vibe-checking. Manually reading outputs. Guessing. > That's how BrainTrust started. And now Vercel, Replit, Ramp, Zapier, Notion, and Airtable all use it. The number that reframes this: the companies whose AI products actually work are running 12.8 eval experiments per day. Think about that cadence. Most AI teams I talk to aren't running 12.8 per month. The framework is simpler than people expect. Every eval is three things: a set of inputs your product handles, a task that generates outputs, and a scoring function that produces a number between 0 and 1. In this episode, we built one from scratch on camera. Score went from 0 to 0.75 in under 20 minutes. Evals are becoming the new PRD. The PMs who build eval infrastructure now are going to compound product quality in a way that PMs who keep vibe-checking simply cannot match. The gap is already opening.

An $800M company exists because evals were so broken that the founder had to build the same internal tool twice, at two different companies, before anyone would pay for it. First at his own startup. Then again leading the AI team at Figma. Same problem both times: teams shipping AI features had no structured way to know if the outputs were getting better or worse. They were vibe-checking. Manually reading outputs. Guessing. > That's how BrainTrust started. And now Vercel, Replit, Ramp, Zapier, Notion, and Airtable all use it. The number that reframes this: the companies whose AI products actually work are running 12.8 eval experiments per day. Think about that cadence. Most AI teams I talk to aren't running 12.8 per month. The framework is simpler than people expect. Every eval is three things: a set of inputs your product handles, a task that generates outputs, and a scoring function that produces a number between 0 and 1. In this episode, we built one from scratch on camera. Score went from 0 to 0.75 in under 20 minutes. Evals are becoming the new PRD. The PMs who build eval infrastructure now are going to compound product quality in a way that PMs who keep vibe-checking simply cannot match. The gap is already opening.

Aakash Gupta

21,624 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

𝐁𝐞𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐃𝐨𝐨𝐫𝐬: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐨 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐚 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐚 𝐭𝐨 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐋𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐀𝐮𝐱𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐚 𝐌𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐰𝐚 The audio saga linking Zimbabwe's main opposition leader Nelson Chamisa to First Lady Auxillia Mnangagwa through her aide Ben Muneri - which has been verified by The NewsHawks beyond reasonable doubt - has further shown that politics is not just what happens in the public sphere, but mostly importantly behind the scenes. While public theatre dominates politics, important decisions are made behind doors, away from the public domain. Supporters of political parties and their leaders are usually left in the dark, and when they discover what has been happening they react with shock, denial and some by being aggressively defensive even when indisputable facts have been placed before them. The backstage environment and manoeuvres allow for genuine negotiation, compromise, and building of trust between opposing sides, away from public scrutiny, which can be essential for making progress on complex issues, yet dangerous as it can lead to cutting personal deals for self-aggrandisement and selling out. Significant deals are often struck in confidential settings, reducing the impact of political theatre and media sensationalism. Lobbyists and mediators often operate in the shadows to influence policy and cut deals without public disclosure. Private meetings are used by politicians to negotiate without fear of backlash from voters or other constituents, allowing for compromises that would be politically fatal in public. Closed-door bargaining allows politicians to engage in dialogue without facing reputational damage if a deal falls through. When not performing for an audience, politicians are more open to practical solutions and concessions. Zimbabwe has had several such arrangements, including four important Governments of National Unity (GNU), including the 1978 Internal Settlement, the 1980 GNU, the 1987 Unity Accord and the 2009-2013 GNU. Relationships between leaders, crucial for long-term policy, are nurtured through confidential, amicable, and trust-building interactions. While democracy primarily aims for transparency, the practical, often messy, processes of negotiation and power-brokering create a strong incentive for politicians to keep key political activity hidden from the public view. The Zimbabwean political landscape, for instance, is often defined by a stark public dichotomy between ruling party Zanu PF and the main opposition, characterised by intense public rivalry and violent repression. However, the emergence of a secretly recorded audio involving Chamisa and Muneri shows a far more complex reality of backroom lines of communication and secret negotiations, bridging the divide after the disputed 2018 and 2023 presidential elections. This situation further explains the capture and deals after the 2023 elections. This saga, which surfaced with recordings of conversations following a social media tiff between political activists Jealousy Mawarire, who is highly critical of President Emmerson Mnangagwa and his 2030 Agenda, and Brighton Mutebuka, a Chamisa loyalist, highlighted backdoor attempts at political maneuvring that stood in contrast to the public rhetoric of a stolen elections. The Secret Negotiations Exposed The audio recordings, which began circulating after the secret talks in 2021 and 2022, featured a conversation between Chamisa, then leading the MDC Alliance, and Muneri, an aide tasked with handling politucal and business interests for First Lady. The context of these discussions was the intense post-2018 election period, marked by brutal violence and killings on August 1, as well as a failed court challenge of the result by Chamisa. The audio shows Chamisa was not merely engaging in public resistance but in secret moves to engage with Mnangagwa, seeking to negotiate a personal deal to become prime minister rather than a broad coalition.

𝐁𝐞𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐃𝐨𝐨𝐫𝐬: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐨 𝐒𝐚𝐠𝐚 𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐚 𝐭𝐨 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐋𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐀𝐮𝐱𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐚 𝐌𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐰𝐚 The audio saga linking Zimbabwe's main opposition leader Nelson Chamisa to First Lady Auxillia Mnangagwa through her aide Ben Muneri - which has been verified by The NewsHawks beyond reasonable doubt - has further shown that politics is not just what happens in the public sphere, but mostly importantly behind the scenes. While public theatre dominates politics, important decisions are made behind doors, away from the public domain. Supporters of political parties and their leaders are usually left in the dark, and when they discover what has been happening they react with shock, denial and some by being aggressively defensive even when indisputable facts have been placed before them. The backstage environment and manoeuvres allow for genuine negotiation, compromise, and building of trust between opposing sides, away from public scrutiny, which can be essential for making progress on complex issues, yet dangerous as it can lead to cutting personal deals for self-aggrandisement and selling out. Significant deals are often struck in confidential settings, reducing the impact of political theatre and media sensationalism. Lobbyists and mediators often operate in the shadows to influence policy and cut deals without public disclosure. Private meetings are used by politicians to negotiate without fear of backlash from voters or other constituents, allowing for compromises that would be politically fatal in public. Closed-door bargaining allows politicians to engage in dialogue without facing reputational damage if a deal falls through. When not performing for an audience, politicians are more open to practical solutions and concessions. Zimbabwe has had several such arrangements, including four important Governments of National Unity (GNU), including the 1978 Internal Settlement, the 1980 GNU, the 1987 Unity Accord and the 2009-2013 GNU. Relationships between leaders, crucial for long-term policy, are nurtured through confidential, amicable, and trust-building interactions. While democracy primarily aims for transparency, the practical, often messy, processes of negotiation and power-brokering create a strong incentive for politicians to keep key political activity hidden from the public view. The Zimbabwean political landscape, for instance, is often defined by a stark public dichotomy between ruling party Zanu PF and the main opposition, characterised by intense public rivalry and violent repression. However, the emergence of a secretly recorded audio involving Chamisa and Muneri shows a far more complex reality of backroom lines of communication and secret negotiations, bridging the divide after the disputed 2018 and 2023 presidential elections. This situation further explains the capture and deals after the 2023 elections. This saga, which surfaced with recordings of conversations following a social media tiff between political activists Jealousy Mawarire, who is highly critical of President Emmerson Mnangagwa and his 2030 Agenda, and Brighton Mutebuka, a Chamisa loyalist, highlighted backdoor attempts at political maneuvring that stood in contrast to the public rhetoric of a stolen elections. The Secret Negotiations Exposed The audio recordings, which began circulating after the secret talks in 2021 and 2022, featured a conversation between Chamisa, then leading the MDC Alliance, and Muneri, an aide tasked with handling politucal and business interests for First Lady. The context of these discussions was the intense post-2018 election period, marked by brutal violence and killings on August 1, as well as a failed court challenge of the result by Chamisa. The audio shows Chamisa was not merely engaging in public resistance but in secret moves to engage with Mnangagwa, seeking to negotiate a personal deal to become prime minister rather than a broad coalition.

TheNewsHawks

52,502 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🎙️You're The Voice - Episode 23 - Dr. Ahmad Malik - Being Comfortable in the Uncomfortable Doc Malik You’re The Voice | Podcast by Efrat Fenigson My guest today is Dr. Ahmad Malik, an Orthopaedic Surgeon turned podcaster on Doc Malik Podcast in light of censorship, silencing & sanctions he underwent in the past few years. This episode is a conversation between two friends about the meaning and essence of life, more than it is a ‘podcast episode’. And yet, in this emotional, yet fun episode, Ahmad shares his personal story and his awakening journey. We deeply explore the phenomena of cancel culture and silencing during the plandemic, especially amongst the medical profession. Ahmad bravely shares the consequences he faced for speaking out, including suspension and losing his job. We also touched on podcasting, building physical and mental resilience, bitcoin, mindset of change adaptation and uncertainty acceptance, finding strength in the face of fear and embracing failure. I think you’ll feel that theme of this episode is the power of love and connection, choosing humanity and unity over division. This episode was recorded 4 months ago yet still very relevant. Enjoyed it? let us know! Please subscribe to Ahmad’s Substack, link in thread. -- CHAPTERS -- 00:00 - Introduction & Personal Story 07:30 - Ahmad Realizing How Unhealthy He Was 12:00 - Flaws in the Medical System 16:20 - Questioning the EU and Brexit 19:00 - Censorship, Cancel Culture, Sanctions During Covid 27:00 - Speaking Out & Getting Suspended 40:00 - Politics & Why Ahmad Started the Podcast 49:00 - Favorite Episodes & The Challenges of Podcasting 57:00 - Adapting to Change, Waking Up 1:10:00 - Avoid Debt & Invest in Bitcoin 1:16:00 - Mental & Physical Resilience, Failure, Fear, Love 1:22:00 - Choosing Humanity and Unity 1:25:00 - Breaking Free from Tribalism 1:29:00 - Health & Well-being, inc. Sleep, Stress, Exercise & Diet 1:40:00 - Meditation & Wrap Up

🎙️You're The Voice - Episode 23 - Dr. Ahmad Malik - Being Comfortable in the Uncomfortable Doc Malik You’re The Voice | Podcast by Efrat Fenigson My guest today is Dr. Ahmad Malik, an Orthopaedic Surgeon turned podcaster on Doc Malik Podcast in light of censorship, silencing & sanctions he underwent in the past few years. This episode is a conversation between two friends about the meaning and essence of life, more than it is a ‘podcast episode’. And yet, in this emotional, yet fun episode, Ahmad shares his personal story and his awakening journey. We deeply explore the phenomena of cancel culture and silencing during the plandemic, especially amongst the medical profession. Ahmad bravely shares the consequences he faced for speaking out, including suspension and losing his job. We also touched on podcasting, building physical and mental resilience, bitcoin, mindset of change adaptation and uncertainty acceptance, finding strength in the face of fear and embracing failure. I think you’ll feel that theme of this episode is the power of love and connection, choosing humanity and unity over division. This episode was recorded 4 months ago yet still very relevant. Enjoyed it? let us know! Please subscribe to Ahmad’s Substack, link in thread. -- CHAPTERS -- 00:00 - Introduction & Personal Story 07:30 - Ahmad Realizing How Unhealthy He Was 12:00 - Flaws in the Medical System 16:20 - Questioning the EU and Brexit 19:00 - Censorship, Cancel Culture, Sanctions During Covid 27:00 - Speaking Out & Getting Suspended 40:00 - Politics & Why Ahmad Started the Podcast 49:00 - Favorite Episodes & The Challenges of Podcasting 57:00 - Adapting to Change, Waking Up 1:10:00 - Avoid Debt & Invest in Bitcoin 1:16:00 - Mental & Physical Resilience, Failure, Fear, Love 1:22:00 - Choosing Humanity and Unity 1:25:00 - Breaking Free from Tribalism 1:29:00 - Health & Well-being, inc. Sleep, Stress, Exercise & Diet 1:40:00 - Meditation & Wrap Up

Efrat Fenigson

27,774 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Analyzing Episode 54. Season 2 aka Disruption by Design When you first watch episode 54, your focus immediately goes to how the bad guys keep winning. Be it Ecmel, Boran, Demir - all the aholes seem to be living it up. But scratch the surface, and another concept appears entirely. Destino, Karma, Kader, Fate - call it whatever you want. That's what I want you to remember as we don our Sherlock caps for yet another analysis. I've divided the whole thing into segments based on characters for easier navigation and understanding. So, here goes nothing. * Sadakat One of the characters to truly surprise me this episode was Sadakat. My vitriolic hatred for this woman is no hidden fact, but this one episode managed to make me see her side of things for once. And, maybe even understand her a little. We were all shocked by the scene where Nare, Alya, and Sadakat are talking about Boran and Cihan. I was mostly surprised because, for once, in 54 freaking episodes, Sadakat accepts her fault and doesn't look for a scapegoat. Her dialogues serve to impart extremely important points about herself, Boran, and Cihan, and how her upbringing helped shape the present circumstances. She admits that she was always afraid of the shadow of Ecmel lurking within Boran, which causes her to hand leadership to Cihan and keep Boran away from everything. But, in trying to protect her family and Albora, Sadakat inadvertently brings about the very thing she fears most - Boran becoming another Ecmel. Now, cast your mind back to the very first episode. We're introduced to Sadakat as an evil witch who's evil to Alya from the get-go and absolutely mental about keeping Deniz with the family at all times. I think I finally understand why. Guilt. Sadakat keeps pushing Boran away, until one day he takes it upon himself to go k-word Sulaiman to prove his worth, so to speak, which results in exile for him and supposedly death in a foreign country. Everything she does from that point on is based on years' worth of accumulated guilt. Alya is driving the car that results in the accident, so she wins the 'get the most shit from Sadakat' award immediately. But, again, that's just her guilt exacerbating things. As for Deniz, was Sadakat trying to avoid the same mistake she made with Boran with Deniz by holding on to him by hook or crook? So that Ecmel's shadow would never shape another family member's life again? Yep. That's probably also why she hates the idea of Cihan and Alya, because her guilt forces her to keep protecting Boran even in death. Because how could she allow Boran to lose yet another thing? In short, Sadakat tries to control the future of her family by trying to shape the circumstances, to make Cihan Aga and keep Boran away, but fails spectacularly. Why? Because fate has other plans. Boran was never meant to be kept away, and no matter how much Sadakat toiled as a mother, he was meant to take Ecmel's side over his own flesh and blood. And maybe Sadakat binds everyone else with a promise except herself because she might be the one to end what she started all those years ago. * Cihan Cihan's struggle in this episode was to try to find a way to neutralize Boran's poison. Because he's the reason Cihan's life is unraveling, because he's the man who controls Alya via Deniz. Throughout the episode, it seems like all is lost for him. Alya is forced to give in to Boran's condition, and Sadakat is framed for Vurgun's murder. And while Vurgun keeps his promise to Boran and takes his secrets with him to the grave, his death helps him speak what he could not say in life. It's no coincidence Cihan is the only one to find Vurgun's secret phone stashed in a hidey hole in the wall right after Cihan says he will bury Boran in regret. In this instance, too, we're shown that circumstances are pressing in on Cihan from all sides, but one dusty footstep later, Cihan finally finds what will possibly be the key to defeating Boran. As for Alya, she's Cihan's greatest strength and weakness - as it generally is in love. She comes into his life as an impossibility and ends up becoming his greatest truth. Cihan relents to Alya finding an apartment because he understands her duty to her son. But just as fears things are all out of his control, fate intervenes and gives him the opening he kept ignoring. Why? Because, as Cihan says, a man low enough to kill someone who saved his life is capable of pretty much anything. So, Cihan's course is redirected subtly, too, to a possibility that will help him achieve what he needs most at the time. * Boran Yeah, I don't really care much for the zombie, but this needs to be said. Throw your mind back to how Sadakat says all Boran's calculations turn out wrong. Though he's a sneaky troll who's not entirely as stupid as I thought, karma has a mile-long shit-list on this ahole. First, he records a will video to punish Cihan. He hopes that Cihan will fall for Alya but will forever suffer the pangs of conscience. In doing so, he'd never find completion in his love for Alya and would keep suffering. But, an Amal Bakir turns up at his grave out of the blue, runs into Cihan, and bam - he finds Boran. Which ironically helps Cihan overcome all his guilt pretty quickly. Next up, Alya. The video Boran records to control Alya's life ends up becoming the key to her freedom from him eventually. The one card we know he has now is Deniz, but there's Vurgun's phone to counteract this one now. And, finally, I get the feeling that the zombie has a hand in Meryem turning up like a bad penny out of nowhere. However, this ploy will fail too, because Meryem will have the same effect on Alya that Boran has on Cihan. In other words, destiny has all ends covered here, too. * Alya While there are those in the fandom who'd rather Alya be sick rather than expecting, I think that Alya truly might be pregnant. Here's why. And keep the overall theme of kader in mind as we go through this part. In the scene right before Alya gets dizzy, Kaya tells her, 'I don't know what to say to you, yenge, may God help you.' Then she walks into her office and just as she's about to continue her search for apartments, wham, a wave of dizziness. And right after the dizzy spell, lo and behold, Boran messages her saying, 'Your path can't cross with Cihan, or I take my son.' See, there it is again. That push and pull between circumstance and fate. While mere mortals can shape circumstances, like Boran, there's no interfering with fate. And, what's fate always tried to do in this story? Keep Alya with Cihan. So, how does a pregnancy fit into this angle? Boran doesn't simply want to keep Alya and Cihan separated. He now wants to put an end to their relationship in every way. Because if he can't have Alya, neither will Cihan. He's done everything in his power to try to cut all bonds between CihAl, but every time he tries, fate throws out another trump card. And what's the best way to forge a bond between two people, no one, not even themselves, can break? A child. A link that will bind Alya to Cihan in the most elemental way there is. The perfect personification of Boran's defeat. Now, I may be wrong (wouldn't be the first time), but those are the vibes I keep getting from as early on as ep 47, where Sadakat is the one trying to convince Alya to leave. Besides, maybe baby, fate also has another surprise up its sleeve for Alya *cue Jaws soundtrack* I'm referring to Meryem, of course. Why do we need Meryem in the overall scheme of kader, anyway? Because Alya needs to learn what fate's already taught Cihan. That love is not something you quietly step away from. Nor is it something you protect by distance, or preserve through sacrifice. Cihan has already gone through that trial. He tried to bury his feelings under duty, under guilt, under everything Boran set in motion, but still ended up right back at Alya. Not just by choice alone, but by something stronger than it. Something that kept correcting his path every time he strayed too far from it. And that’s where Meryem comes in. The final piece of the puzzle to make Alya realize she's changed, even though she doesn't know it yet. While she may think she can distance herself from Cihan, her own actions prove her false. Meryem will help remove the illusion in Alya's head that distance is sustainable between herself and Cihan. So you see, even though there are all kinds of mess in the episode, underneath it all is a disruption. Be it in the form of bitter clarity, a hidden phone, a possible new life, or an unexpected return. When things look like chaos but are actually headed towards something much more deliberate - a resolution where the story corrects every path back to where it was always meant to lead. Till later, happy reading, folks. #CihAl #UzakŞehir

Analyzing Episode 54. Season 2 aka Disruption by Design When you first watch episode 54, your focus immediately goes to how the bad guys keep winning. Be it Ecmel, Boran, Demir - all the aholes seem to be living it up. But scratch the surface, and another concept appears entirely. Destino, Karma, Kader, Fate - call it whatever you want. That's what I want you to remember as we don our Sherlock caps for yet another analysis. I've divided the whole thing into segments based on characters for easier navigation and understanding. So, here goes nothing. * Sadakat One of the characters to truly surprise me this episode was Sadakat. My vitriolic hatred for this woman is no hidden fact, but this one episode managed to make me see her side of things for once. And, maybe even understand her a little. We were all shocked by the scene where Nare, Alya, and Sadakat are talking about Boran and Cihan. I was mostly surprised because, for once, in 54 freaking episodes, Sadakat accepts her fault and doesn't look for a scapegoat. Her dialogues serve to impart extremely important points about herself, Boran, and Cihan, and how her upbringing helped shape the present circumstances. She admits that she was always afraid of the shadow of Ecmel lurking within Boran, which causes her to hand leadership to Cihan and keep Boran away from everything. But, in trying to protect her family and Albora, Sadakat inadvertently brings about the very thing she fears most - Boran becoming another Ecmel. Now, cast your mind back to the very first episode. We're introduced to Sadakat as an evil witch who's evil to Alya from the get-go and absolutely mental about keeping Deniz with the family at all times. I think I finally understand why. Guilt. Sadakat keeps pushing Boran away, until one day he takes it upon himself to go k-word Sulaiman to prove his worth, so to speak, which results in exile for him and supposedly death in a foreign country. Everything she does from that point on is based on years' worth of accumulated guilt. Alya is driving the car that results in the accident, so she wins the 'get the most shit from Sadakat' award immediately. But, again, that's just her guilt exacerbating things. As for Deniz, was Sadakat trying to avoid the same mistake she made with Boran with Deniz by holding on to him by hook or crook? So that Ecmel's shadow would never shape another family member's life again? Yep. That's probably also why she hates the idea of Cihan and Alya, because her guilt forces her to keep protecting Boran even in death. Because how could she allow Boran to lose yet another thing? In short, Sadakat tries to control the future of her family by trying to shape the circumstances, to make Cihan Aga and keep Boran away, but fails spectacularly. Why? Because fate has other plans. Boran was never meant to be kept away, and no matter how much Sadakat toiled as a mother, he was meant to take Ecmel's side over his own flesh and blood. And maybe Sadakat binds everyone else with a promise except herself because she might be the one to end what she started all those years ago. * Cihan Cihan's struggle in this episode was to try to find a way to neutralize Boran's poison. Because he's the reason Cihan's life is unraveling, because he's the man who controls Alya via Deniz. Throughout the episode, it seems like all is lost for him. Alya is forced to give in to Boran's condition, and Sadakat is framed for Vurgun's murder. And while Vurgun keeps his promise to Boran and takes his secrets with him to the grave, his death helps him speak what he could not say in life. It's no coincidence Cihan is the only one to find Vurgun's secret phone stashed in a hidey hole in the wall right after Cihan says he will bury Boran in regret. In this instance, too, we're shown that circumstances are pressing in on Cihan from all sides, but one dusty footstep later, Cihan finally finds what will possibly be the key to defeating Boran. As for Alya, she's Cihan's greatest strength and weakness - as it generally is in love. She comes into his life as an impossibility and ends up becoming his greatest truth. Cihan relents to Alya finding an apartment because he understands her duty to her son. But just as fears things are all out of his control, fate intervenes and gives him the opening he kept ignoring. Why? Because, as Cihan says, a man low enough to kill someone who saved his life is capable of pretty much anything. So, Cihan's course is redirected subtly, too, to a possibility that will help him achieve what he needs most at the time. * Boran Yeah, I don't really care much for the zombie, but this needs to be said. Throw your mind back to how Sadakat says all Boran's calculations turn out wrong. Though he's a sneaky troll who's not entirely as stupid as I thought, karma has a mile-long shit-list on this ahole. First, he records a will video to punish Cihan. He hopes that Cihan will fall for Alya but will forever suffer the pangs of conscience. In doing so, he'd never find completion in his love for Alya and would keep suffering. But, an Amal Bakir turns up at his grave out of the blue, runs into Cihan, and bam - he finds Boran. Which ironically helps Cihan overcome all his guilt pretty quickly. Next up, Alya. The video Boran records to control Alya's life ends up becoming the key to her freedom from him eventually. The one card we know he has now is Deniz, but there's Vurgun's phone to counteract this one now. And, finally, I get the feeling that the zombie has a hand in Meryem turning up like a bad penny out of nowhere. However, this ploy will fail too, because Meryem will have the same effect on Alya that Boran has on Cihan. In other words, destiny has all ends covered here, too. * Alya While there are those in the fandom who'd rather Alya be sick rather than expecting, I think that Alya truly might be pregnant. Here's why. And keep the overall theme of kader in mind as we go through this part. In the scene right before Alya gets dizzy, Kaya tells her, 'I don't know what to say to you, yenge, may God help you.' Then she walks into her office and just as she's about to continue her search for apartments, wham, a wave of dizziness. And right after the dizzy spell, lo and behold, Boran messages her saying, 'Your path can't cross with Cihan, or I take my son.' See, there it is again. That push and pull between circumstance and fate. While mere mortals can shape circumstances, like Boran, there's no interfering with fate. And, what's fate always tried to do in this story? Keep Alya with Cihan. So, how does a pregnancy fit into this angle? Boran doesn't simply want to keep Alya and Cihan separated. He now wants to put an end to their relationship in every way. Because if he can't have Alya, neither will Cihan. He's done everything in his power to try to cut all bonds between CihAl, but every time he tries, fate throws out another trump card. And what's the best way to forge a bond between two people, no one, not even themselves, can break? A child. A link that will bind Alya to Cihan in the most elemental way there is. The perfect personification of Boran's defeat. Now, I may be wrong (wouldn't be the first time), but those are the vibes I keep getting from as early on as ep 47, where Sadakat is the one trying to convince Alya to leave. Besides, maybe baby, fate also has another surprise up its sleeve for Alya cue Jaws soundtrack I'm referring to Meryem, of course. Why do we need Meryem in the overall scheme of kader, anyway? Because Alya needs to learn what fate's already taught Cihan. That love is not something you quietly step away from. Nor is it something you protect by distance, or preserve through sacrifice. Cihan has already gone through that trial. He tried to bury his feelings under duty, under guilt, under everything Boran set in motion, but still ended up right back at Alya. Not just by choice alone, but by something stronger than it. Something that kept correcting his path every time he strayed too far from it. And that’s where Meryem comes in. The final piece of the puzzle to make Alya realize she's changed, even though she doesn't know it yet. While she may think she can distance herself from Cihan, her own actions prove her false. Meryem will help remove the illusion in Alya's head that distance is sustainable between herself and Cihan. So you see, even though there are all kinds of mess in the episode, underneath it all is a disruption. Be it in the form of bitter clarity, a hidden phone, a possible new life, or an unexpected return. When things look like chaos but are actually headed towards something much more deliberate - a resolution where the story corrects every path back to where it was always meant to lead. Till later, happy reading, folks. #CihAl #UzakŞehir

CocoLoco

32,285 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce