A large tree trunk has been uncovered beneath a glacier in the Alps, dated to around 6,000 years ago. The species is Swiss stone pine. Today, trees of that type cannot grow at that altitude because it is far too cold. This means that when that tree was alive,... the climate there had to be warmer than today. 6,000 years ago aligns with the Holocene climate optimum, a time when temperatures were far higher than now, even with far less atmospheric CO2. Earth's climate is cyclical and Mother Nature self-regulates. Narratives of doom serve political aims, not reality.show more

I love these discoveries and the absolute silence of the climate hysterians who preach only gloom and doom and how it's "never been like this before."

Happening in multiple places that glaciers have receded. Human artifacts also discovered.

The sun is the source of all incoming energy to the planet. Increased insolation apparently has quite a profound effect on global climate.

Wait 🫢 you mean all the CLIMATE HYSTERIA about how we are destroying the planet is just a bunch of HOT AIR Pun intended. If trees once grew at that Altitude that means the planet got colder for all you LIBTARDS reading this post. #ClimateHoax is a means to control the populace

Or... Look where the alps end up after an IITPW:

Tree trunks are fine, but they’re not as good of evidence as a peer reviewed study.

There a petrified palm tree just outside Banff in Alberta which means it was much warmer thousands of years ago. CO2 is plant food! Climate change is a hoax!

We are not and never have been destroying the planet. Destroying what we think is civilisation and even the human race perhaps, maybe just our way of living but not the planet. Really, it's nothing to worry about unless your lifestyle trumps all.

It's because climate change happened due to carbon dioxide in 1,000,000 BC....because of Trump.

100% truth

Marvelous and welcome news. Quit the "climate" spending. Focus on global pollution. Stop the export of pollution by India and China at their rivers. Until they restore clean water and clean air, reduce trade till they are suffocating in their own pollution. Then they'll stop.

Inconvenient Truths 😆

Isn't it unwise and potentially self-discrediting to jump to the conclusion that “Earth's climate is cyclical and Mother Nature self-regulates”? Doesn't that make it look like your motive is ideological, that you're biased by preconceptions, that your reasoning is motivated?

Holocene optimum was orbital insolation, boreal summer, peaking at 65N. Regional. Today is CO2 forcing, global, year-round. Different mechanism, different fingerprint.

(sticking my fingers in my ears...) I CAN'T HEAR YOU! I CAN'T HEAR YOU...so forth so on.

Alleluia!

Sure. In US a glazier recessed "catastrofically" uncovering remains of a 500 years old forest.

Vikings grew barley in Greenland when it was warm enough Then global cooling happened and the vikings all starved to death. Archaeologists found horse hooves with human teeth marks How bad would it be if Greenlanders could grow barley again?

Check out Sunweatherman, we are the third rock from the Sun... and we are being indoctrinated that we control this rock

Or there was a upheaval of the land mass pushing upward, taking the trees of that time to an elevation that would be too cold... Perhaps climate never changed, altitude did. Worlds in collision....

The absolute scientific illiteracy required to think this debunks global warming is embarrassing. The only reason these 6,000-year-old trees are being uncovered right now is because modern warming is obliterating the glaciers at an unprecedented pace.

Seguro q hace mas.

Oh yeah? Well, we have been monitoring temperatures for over 100 years now and they’ve only gone up!

542 million years ago during the Cambrian Period the CO2 level was 7,000 ppm. In 17/10,000 of the life span of the planet all multicellular complex life forms to ever exist were found in the fossil evidence suggesting a welcoming environment.

@tyillc Past performance is not an indication of future performance.

But that's just REALITY. Has it been approved by AUTHORITY? Educated folk cannot digest raw reality.

Logo a narrativa do aquecimento global é uma farsa.

Ho ho ho! Good try but you can't convince me that the earth undergoes periodic natural cycles. I ain't no dummy! Yuck Yuck. Good one Electroverse. Har har

Someone tell the Democrats

Yep spent 30 years in the Alps, no trees above 2,000 metres

@TrentTelenko The difference is how fast it shifts. Not that it havent been hotter or colder before. Or that it had to sustain 7 billion people. Yes some people Doom far too hard. But where online we used to have ice on the sea when i was a kid. There is no ice forming on the sea for decades.