A MASSIVE Cleveland Clinic study found flu vaccination was associated with a 27% HIGHER RISK OF FLU. Vaccines should NEVER have NEGATIVE EFFICACY. Flu shots are a TOTAL FAILURE.

"The risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated state (HR, 1.27; 95% C.I., 1.07 – 1.51; P = 0.007), yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9% (95% C.I., −55.0 to −6.6%)."

I had my annual exam yesterday. Doctor's last remark 'Do you want Flu Vax?' I paused, look at him and the cartoon voice in my head said 'Get a new Doctor.' #VaccineGenocide #fauciliedmillionsdied #VAXinjuries @SecKennedy

Ill just leave this right here...would anyone want any of these tasty ingredients injected into their body? Wonder why there's an increased risk of infection and lifelong chronic health issues...

In 2008, my employer required the flu vax. I developed the flu shortly after. That was the last time I got a flu shot….and also the last time i got the flu.

Proof that every tree is a factory producing hundreds of medicines Our mothers,fathers, grandmother's and Grandfathers didn't have any vacancies.They lived longer and healthier LIVES ##CrimesAgainstHumanity 👇

Mom, 73yo with vascular dementia, used to get flu shots faithfully. Got the flu every single year, often more than once. No flu shot in the 6 years I've been her caregiver, has not had the flu even once. New doctor offered it the other day, I told her the same. Zero pushback.

I knew that. Never sicker in my life then when I got a flu vac

Non reviewed reprint paper. Are you sure you have a MPH?

Herd control is lucrative, market pumps are fabricated.

I knew that, and never had them! Trust the Lord and stay healthy.

il primario di Malattie Infettive della Cleveland Clinic, il Dr. Steven Gordon, è intervenuto pubblicamente per chiarire che lo studio nn dimostra affatto che il vaccino causi l'influenza (essendo formulato con virus inattivati che nn possono replicarsi)

Antibody Dependent Enhancement and poorly inactivated "antigens". Well done Nic!

27% higher risk? That’s a serious finding that deserves real scrutiny. People deserve transparency, honest data, and answers—not blind trust. If the numbers raise questions, those questions need to be addressed openly. 💯

In the UK us parents are again being asked to grant permission to give our young children a nasal vaccine. I cannot see any beneficial purpose to this, only many costs to our health and wealth. Thoughts?

shedding is real bad with these--

One study, one season, one measure. The travelling showman reads it and proclaims the whole art a failure entire. See the leap, kindred souls: a narrow finding costumed as a universal verdict. That jump is the trick, not the scroll itself.

Imagine that.

Higher risk of flu? (implying flu is everywhere waiting to pounce on the unwary the moment they have their vaccinations) or do the flu vaccines give the recipient the virus? I suspect they do. I believe this also happened with Covid, leading to increased cases soon after jabs

Agreed! How hospitals can still mandate them for their employees is criminal

I would think it would be a 💯% higher risk 😵‍💫

Unless... Except... That was the plan And with vax weakened immunity... More deaths Less SS and Med5

That’s interesting. That looks like a preprint. I recall the new mRNA flu vaccine to be 27% more effective than traditional flu vaccines.

@Juliedonuts I refused flu shots my whole life. The only time I was forced to have was on infusions for autoimmune. I flat out refused them years ago. Thank goodness

@Juliedonuts Flu shots are a bioweapon

Bien évidemment

The selection bias alone could account for negative outcomes. Working age individuals who are more likely to seek diagnoses when sick will have a higher diagnosis of flu. Not including elderly, children & accounting for positive test, not severe cases of flu is a flaw.

Agreed

That specific year…would you like to explain the nuances specific to influenza recombination and best guess practices or shall I?