Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

A massive, united voice has risen - devout Hindus and multiple Hindu organizations have come together and officially filed complaints at Ponda and Mapusa, demanding equal enforcement of the law. Those who insulted our revered deities Lord Ram & Mata Sita must face immediate arrest and strict action. The...

57,581 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The events surrounding Sandlana’s arrest reveal a man who operates far beyond the reach of ordinary accountability. When law-enforcement attempted to execute a lawful warrant, they did not encounter a private citizen but a fortified power centre protected by armed guards, perimeter security, and crowds mobilised to resist the State. Officers were surrounded, shoved back, injured, and even dispossessed of an official firearm. That level of coordinated defiance reflects neither panic nor misunderstanding it reflects a command structure whose members respond to Sandlana with military-style discipline. Vusi Ndala’s own video and who is out on bail, in which he threatens that anyone seeking to arrest Sandlana must first arrest an entire council or congregation, confirms the existence of a machinery of intimidation deliberately engineered to shield him from accountability. Such conduct is irreconcilable with the conditions of bail and demonstrates the applicant’s capacity to raise organised resistance at any moment. The danger is heightened by the calculated manner in which the applicant and his associates sought to avoid arrest. When confronted with a lawful warrant, Sandlana denied being on the property, stalled for time, and used the presence of his followers to delay police operations for hours. His associates, including Ndala, have repeatedly fled to the same compound when facing arrest precisely because they know they will find protection behind loyal guards and mobilised crowds primed to obstruct law-enforcement. These are not the actions of individuals who respect legal authority; they reveal a belief that the law can be outnumbered, overwhelmed, or intimidated into retreat. Returning such an individual to the very environment that enabled this obstruction would invite further evasion, further mobilisation, and further destabilisation of State authority. Compounding these risks is the applicant’s demonstrated ability to manipulate, corrupt, or intimidate elements within the justice system itself. He has cultivated influence within judicial, legal, and administrative processes, enabling him to secure tactical advantages, distort proceedings, or weaponise courts against witnesses. His resources and network allow him not only to obstruct investigations on the ground but to interfere with institutional mechanisms from within. An individual capable of enticing or co-opting justice officials cannot be trusted to comply with bail conditions; instead, he will exploit release to tamper with evidence, intimidate witnesses, and strategically undermine the administration of justice. Beyond the physical and institutional threats lies a broader public risk. Granting bail to a person who can summon violent resistance, defy lawful arrest, and marshal crowds to confront police would signal that influence, intimidation, and power can override the law. At a time when public trust in the criminal justice system is already fragile, such a decision would deepen the perception that powerful individuals operate under different rules. Witnesses would be terrified, investigators discouraged, and the public disillusioned. Protecting the integrity of the justice system, safeguarding the safety of law-enforcement, and preserving public order all point to one unavoidable conclusion: Sandlana must not be granted bail. NPASouthAfrica The Presidency 🇿🇦 SA Police Service 🇿🇦

Modibe Vladimir Modiba

26,031 views • 7 months ago