Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A NASA scientist describing an “Protective AI layer above Earth.” Beatriz Villarroel’s research indicates what may be a vast "drone network" of objects operating around our planet—with the data potentially pointing to thousands if not 100,000 objects. Then there is The Sphere Network research, which presents a data driven... show more

Patrick Jackson

23,991 subscribers

30,065 views • 16 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Huge News! ProPixel Video Analysis and Research has been watching the skies for a while now — and he has spotted the Sphere Network! Take a look for yourself. The pattern is there. The movement is there. The connection is impossible to ignore. Ross Coulthart Beatriz Villarroel #thespherenetwork #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #uap #ufox

Huge News! ProPixel Video Analysis and Research has been watching the skies for a while now — and he has spotted the Sphere Network! Take a look for yourself. The pattern is there. The movement is there. The connection is impossible to ignore. Ross Coulthart Beatriz Villarroel #thespherenetwork #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #uap #ufox

Patrick Jackson

10,856 views • 1 month ago

So i figured out what type of light i need to use to attract and trigger the sphere network in the sky above.. Here is a video of them swarming. Also keep an eye out for the moving V formations in perfect trilateration. #transients #thespherenetwork Beatriz Villarroel #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #uap

So i figured out what type of light i need to use to attract and trigger the sphere network in the sky above.. Here is a video of them swarming. Also keep an eye out for the moving V formations in perfect trilateration. #transients #thespherenetwork Beatriz Villarroel #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #uap

Patrick Jackson

23,437 views • 4 months ago

People all calling for disclosure when it's quite simple to process, in a nutshell the earth is surrounded by 100,000 plus small advanced uap spheres (drone network) operating in triangles on three layers within our atmosphere and more layers out in space. Filter the night sky via geometry and it's obvious. What is occurring is AI based machine learning warfare between the sphere network and external groups - non stop - on a daily basis. One finds unique signitures to penetrate the grid, the network learns and adapts, meaning the battle line is always changing.. hence why airports and nuclear bases are locked down by these UAP spheres such as the New Jersey flap & Heathrow and Gatwick events. Everything else out there in UAP world is white noise - endless speculation - zero data documentarys and dead ends with community in-fighting all over the place.. This stuff really isn't hard. #thespherenetwork #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #uap #ufox

People all calling for disclosure when it's quite simple to process, in a nutshell the earth is surrounded by 100,000 plus small advanced uap spheres (drone network) operating in triangles on three layers within our atmosphere and more layers out in space. Filter the night sky via geometry and it's obvious. What is occurring is AI based machine learning warfare between the sphere network and external groups - non stop - on a daily basis. One finds unique signitures to penetrate the grid, the network learns and adapts, meaning the battle line is always changing.. hence why airports and nuclear bases are locked down by these UAP spheres such as the New Jersey flap & Heathrow and Gatwick events. Everything else out there in UAP world is white noise - endless speculation - zero data documentarys and dead ends with community in-fighting all over the place.. This stuff really isn't hard. #thespherenetwork #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #uap #ufox

Patrick Jackson

42,151 views • 8 days ago

The uap spheres account for over 52% of all uap sightings, and now the equilateral triangles they create are everywhere - from Australia to Denmark to France / Brazil to the USA - days apart.. I recorded this over two years ago - the formations up in deep space, if I am right, this is what Beatriz Villarroel has also found.. she said it herself.. it appears to be technology.. #thespherenetwork #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #UAP #ufoX

The uap spheres account for over 52% of all uap sightings, and now the equilateral triangles they create are everywhere - from Australia to Denmark to France / Brazil to the USA - days apart.. I recorded this over two years ago - the formations up in deep space, if I am right, this is what Beatriz Villarroel has also found.. she said it herself.. it appears to be technology.. #thespherenetwork #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #UAP #ufoX

Patrick Jackson

36,701 views • 10 months ago

🚨 Ross Coulthart: Dr. Beatriz Villarroel’s New Discovery Could Be “A Disclosure Moment” 🚨 Ross Coulthart says he’s “really excited” about Dr. Beatriz Villarroel’s latest pre‑print paper now in peer review revealing lines of over 100,000 specular, mirror like objects in space that may indicate artificial, non human technology. Using historic Palomar Observatory photographic plates from before the satellite era, Villarroel’s research previously tied objects in geosynchronous orbit to the famous 1952 Washington D.C. UFO wave. Her latest findings reveal objects arranged in straight lines with reflective surfaces suggesting potential technological construction. If confirmed, Coulthart calls it “potentially a disclosure moment.” Full interview with Dr. Villarroel coming soon on Reality Check. Source: #RossCoulthart #BeatrizVillarroel #UAP #UFO #Disclosure #Space #Astronomy #Palomar #1952UFO #ScienceNews

🚨 Ross Coulthart: Dr. Beatriz Villarroel’s New Discovery Could Be “A Disclosure Moment” 🚨 Ross Coulthart says he’s “really excited” about Dr. Beatriz Villarroel’s latest pre‑print paper now in peer review revealing lines of over 100,000 specular, mirror like objects in space that may indicate artificial, non human technology. Using historic Palomar Observatory photographic plates from before the satellite era, Villarroel’s research previously tied objects in geosynchronous orbit to the famous 1952 Washington D.C. UFO wave. Her latest findings reveal objects arranged in straight lines with reflective surfaces suggesting potential technological construction. If confirmed, Coulthart calls it “potentially a disclosure moment.” Full interview with Dr. Villarroel coming soon on Reality Check. Source: #RossCoulthart #BeatrizVillarroel #UAP #UFO #Disclosure #Space #Astronomy #Palomar #1952UFO #ScienceNews

Skywatch Signal

27,690 views • 1 year ago

Andrej, This sounds extremely useful, and I think it might be even more significant than it first appears. What you describe is not just a knowledge base for information. The structure of the wiki, the queries you file back, etc, encode *how* you do research: which questions to ask, which connections matter, what's worth pursuing. That's “know-how” (in the sense of Michael Polanyi). This sort of knowledge is, currently, overwhelmingly absent from training data, because it was never written down (since there was no point). Now there is, because it significantly improves the AIs performance. But notice what's happening. You propose to build the most efficient mechanism ever devised for making tacit expert know-how / methodology explicit and machine-readable, and then transmitting it, via API, to a third-party model provider. Every query against the wiki is a reasoning trace: see attached video clip. The compiled wiki itself is a structured map of your research process. This is the mechanism described here: Expert know-how is being externalised and captured through ordinary productive use of AI tools. The user gets a better tool. The platform gets a transferable problem-solving strategy. The fact that this works so well could, in a sense, be the problem: the better it works, the more indispensable it becomes, the more know-how flows out, and, realistically, the less choice people have *not* to use it. Your instinct that "there is room here for an incredible new product" is right. But whoever builds it will be sitting on the highest-fidelity capture mechanism for expert know-how ever constructed. The question is: is the data subject to a “data network effect”, by which I mean, the kind of “data flywheel” which gave Google a 25 year monopoly over search? If so, you might be building not only more most powerful tool humanity has ever possessed, but this power might end up in the hands of a single entity. It would be great to hear your thoughts around this.

Andrej, This sounds extremely useful, and I think it might be even more significant than it first appears. What you describe is not just a knowledge base for information. The structure of the wiki, the queries you file back, etc, encode how you do research: which questions to ask, which connections matter, what's worth pursuing. That's “know-how” (in the sense of Michael Polanyi). This sort of knowledge is, currently, overwhelmingly absent from training data, because it was never written down (since there was no point). Now there is, because it significantly improves the AIs performance. But notice what's happening. You propose to build the most efficient mechanism ever devised for making tacit expert know-how / methodology explicit and machine-readable, and then transmitting it, via API, to a third-party model provider. Every query against the wiki is a reasoning trace: see attached video clip. The compiled wiki itself is a structured map of your research process. This is the mechanism described here: Expert know-how is being externalised and captured through ordinary productive use of AI tools. The user gets a better tool. The platform gets a transferable problem-solving strategy. The fact that this works so well could, in a sense, be the problem: the better it works, the more indispensable it becomes, the more know-how flows out, and, realistically, the less choice people have not to use it. Your instinct that "there is room here for an incredible new product" is right. But whoever builds it will be sitting on the highest-fidelity capture mechanism for expert know-how ever constructed. The question is: is the data subject to a “data network effect”, by which I mean, the kind of “data flywheel” which gave Google a 25 year monopoly over search? If so, you might be building not only more most powerful tool humanity has ever possessed, but this power might end up in the hands of a single entity. It would be great to hear your thoughts around this.

John Fletcher (𝔦, 𝔦)

41,341 views • 4 months ago

INFURIATING. Former CDC Director Robert Redfield reveals gain of function research is still happening under a different scientific definition: "The president has passed an executive order to stop the research, but the truth is this type of research is [still] being done. Part of the reason is the scientific community chose to change the definition." "If you start with a virus that's not pathogenic for humans and turn it into a highly pathogenic for humans, they say that's not gain-of-function research. In order for it to be gain-of-function research it has to be pathogenic from the beginning." "It's a false argument. Very disappointing. We ought to move away from this type of research."

INFURIATING. Former CDC Director Robert Redfield reveals gain of function research is still happening under a different scientific definition: "The president has passed an executive order to stop the research, but the truth is this type of research is [still] being done. Part of the reason is the scientific community chose to change the definition." "If you start with a virus that's not pathogenic for humans and turn it into a highly pathogenic for humans, they say that's not gain-of-function research. In order for it to be gain-of-function research it has to be pathogenic from the beginning." "It's a false argument. Very disappointing. We ought to move away from this type of research."

Andrew Kolvet

91,899 views • 1 day ago

What if you could visualise how electricity flows from a wind farm in Scotland to your home in London? Ok it's not quite that simple, but it got me thinking that there must be a way of visualising the complexity of the electricity transmission grid in Great Britain. This is my first attempt… What you're seeing are the real power lines and substations on the transmission grid using OpenStreetMap data. The real connections between each substation are found using PyPSA-Eur as well as calculating the "electrical distance" or impedance between each substation. This is my incredibly basic and naive way of attempting to show the "speed" at which the energy is moving through the network, where the bottlenecks are, etc. I know it's not as simple as this, but it's a first attempt so… 😉 I've also added a way to pick any substation in the network and show how electricity pulses through the rest of the network from that point. This is the magic sauce that really brings to life how much infrastructure electricity has to pass through to get from point A to point B. Of course this isn't really what happens, and there's no demand to soak up the energy. However I think it still serves as an interesting visual of how complex the network actually is and the distances involved to get energy from one side of the country to the other. What do you think? Is this worth exploring further?

What if you could visualise how electricity flows from a wind farm in Scotland to your home in London? Ok it's not quite that simple, but it got me thinking that there must be a way of visualising the complexity of the electricity transmission grid in Great Britain. This is my first attempt… What you're seeing are the real power lines and substations on the transmission grid using OpenStreetMap data. The real connections between each substation are found using PyPSA-Eur as well as calculating the "electrical distance" or impedance between each substation. This is my incredibly basic and naive way of attempting to show the "speed" at which the energy is moving through the network, where the bottlenecks are, etc. I know it's not as simple as this, but it's a first attempt so… 😉 I've also added a way to pick any substation in the network and show how electricity pulses through the rest of the network from that point. This is the magic sauce that really brings to life how much infrastructure electricity has to pass through to get from point A to point B. Of course this isn't really what happens, and there's no demand to soak up the energy. However I think it still serves as an interesting visual of how complex the network actually is and the distances involved to get energy from one side of the country to the other. What do you think? Is this worth exploring further?

Robin Hawkes

144,544 views • 6 months ago

AI cannot change the world if the world cannot reach it. We are building an airborne connectivity layer for the next era of digital infrastructure, designed to extend the network above our AirNodes and below the satellites in orbit. For AirNode Operators, it means they can deploy anywhere, connect anyone. For $WMTX, it means more network, more usage. For EarthNodes, it means more data and services to run. The future needs a new layer of connectivity and that layer is World Mobile Stratospheric

AI cannot change the world if the world cannot reach it. We are building an airborne connectivity layer for the next era of digital infrastructure, designed to extend the network above our AirNodes and below the satellites in orbit. For AirNode Operators, it means they can deploy anywhere, connect anyone. For $WMTX, it means more network, more usage. For EarthNodes, it means more data and services to run. The future needs a new layer of connectivity and that layer is World Mobile Stratospheric

Micky (Mr Telecom) Watkins

12,395 views • 2 months ago

It's not uncommon to find 15, or even 50, different organizations dedicated to a single rare disease. This is without a doubt holding the rare disease community back. The reality is that compared to more common diseases, rare diseases already face significant hurdles in accessing resources. This scarcity is amplified by the fragmentation of groups. Each organization, operating in isolation, struggles to gather sufficient patient data and biospecimens, which are crucial for advancing research and treatment options. Imagine the potential if these groups could unite their efforts. By combining resources, sharing data, and collaborating on research, we could accelerate progress in ways that are currently out of reach. How can we foster greater unity in the rare disease community? What steps can we take to ensure that every organization, family, and patient is part of a larger, more effective network? #MedTwitter

It's not uncommon to find 15, or even 50, different organizations dedicated to a single rare disease. This is without a doubt holding the rare disease community back. The reality is that compared to more common diseases, rare diseases already face significant hurdles in accessing resources. This scarcity is amplified by the fragmentation of groups. Each organization, operating in isolation, struggles to gather sufficient patient data and biospecimens, which are crucial for advancing research and treatment options. Imagine the potential if these groups could unite their efforts. By combining resources, sharing data, and collaborating on research, we could accelerate progress in ways that are currently out of reach. How can we foster greater unity in the rare disease community? What steps can we take to ensure that every organization, family, and patient is part of a larger, more effective network? #MedTwitter

David Fajgenbaum, MD

27,305 views • 2 years ago

🚨 What if Daniel Sheehan was right about the NHI intervention after all and what we're seeing is the beginning of it? Is the US gov taking time to make a plan on how best to disclose the NHI presence? #Ufotwitter #Uap #Ufox #Ovni #Alien #Uaphearing #NJ #NewJerseyUFO #Drones

🚨 What if Daniel Sheehan was right about the NHI intervention after all and what we're seeing is the beginning of it? Is the US gov taking time to make a plan on how best to disclose the NHI presence? #Ufotwitter #Uap #Ufox #Ovni #Alien #Uaphearing #NJ #NewJerseyUFO #Drones

T R U T H P O L E

82,310 views • 1 year ago

🚨Congress Is Digging Deeper Into the UFO Files Rep. Eric Burlison says the FBI has filmed glowing orbs moving intelligently, a secret 1952 recording linked to the Washington UFO wave is now being declassified, and Congress is actively investigating the Varginha incident in Brazil. Three major developments are all pointing in the same direction making this finally seem like a serious investigation. Source: #UAP #UFO #EricBurlison #Varginha #disclosure #ufotwitter #uapX

🚨Congress Is Digging Deeper Into the UFO Files Rep. Eric Burlison says the FBI has filmed glowing orbs moving intelligently, a secret 1952 recording linked to the Washington UFO wave is now being declassified, and Congress is actively investigating the Varginha incident in Brazil. Three major developments are all pointing in the same direction making this finally seem like a serious investigation. Source: #UAP #UFO #EricBurlison #Varginha #disclosure #ufotwitter #uapX

Skywatch Signal

12,461 views • 1 month ago

From an idea to the essential connectivity layer in web3 At WalletCon, Pedro Gomes reflected on the journey of WalletConnect, how it became a network powering millions of connections and what is next with WCT Watch the full keynote ⤵️

From an idea to the essential connectivity layer in web3 At WalletCon, Pedro Gomes reflected on the journey of WalletConnect, how it became a network powering millions of connections and what is next with WCT Watch the full keynote ⤵️

WalletConnect

45,843 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Sabine Hossenfelder Just Covered Beatriz Villarroel’s Latest UAP Papers For the first time, a mainstream physicist is saying it out loud, and not just any physicist! Sabine says: “We have images of likely artificial objects orbiting Earth before Sputnik.” Five transients, in perfect lines on old photographic plates from 1949–1957. Each dot reflecting sunlight showing objects that vanish in Earth’s shadow. Beatriz Villarroel’s team at Nordita just dropped peer reviewed work showing these patterns are statistically real, not film dust or noise (22 sigma significance). And Hossenfelder, one of the most skeptical voices in physics looked at the data and called it: “The most convincing evidence of unidentified aerial phenomena I’ve seen.” Watch The Full Thing Here: #BeatrizVillarroel #UAP #Disclosure #SabineHossenfelder #Science

🚨 Sabine Hossenfelder Just Covered Beatriz Villarroel’s Latest UAP Papers For the first time, a mainstream physicist is saying it out loud, and not just any physicist! Sabine says: “We have images of likely artificial objects orbiting Earth before Sputnik.” Five transients, in perfect lines on old photographic plates from 1949–1957. Each dot reflecting sunlight showing objects that vanish in Earth’s shadow. Beatriz Villarroel’s team at Nordita just dropped peer reviewed work showing these patterns are statistically real, not film dust or noise (22 sigma significance). And Hossenfelder, one of the most skeptical voices in physics looked at the data and called it: “The most convincing evidence of unidentified aerial phenomena I’ve seen.” Watch The Full Thing Here: #BeatrizVillarroel #UAP #Disclosure #SabineHossenfelder #Science

Skywatch Signal

47,604 views • 9 months ago

Spexi is the largest decentralized drone imaging network on Earth. A DePIN of high-resolution visual data captured by local pilots + verified on-chain. 900x sharper than satellites. This is how physical AI will see the world. Listen to COO Alec Wilson on Spexi ↓

Spexi is the largest decentralized drone imaging network on Earth. A DePIN of high-resolution visual data captured by local pilots + verified on-chain. 900x sharper than satellites. This is how physical AI will see the world. Listen to COO Alec Wilson on Spexi ↓

IoTeX

26,012 views • 1 year ago

This is what PCT has to say to Pioneers!! Congratulations to all Pi Network Pioneers 💐 We made it “ So Pioneers, final words, don’t let the noises distract you. Focus on what matters and what makes a difference in the crypto space and in the world. Keep looking and keep creating , and everything else will follow. Let’s show the world a different path to Crypto and the power of Pi Network in the new year of Open Network” ☺️💐 Let’s #Supportpiapps #piutilities The Times of PiNetwork Pi Network #PiNetwork #PiNetwork2025 #PiNetworkListing

This is what PCT has to say to Pioneers!! Congratulations to all Pi Network Pioneers 💐 We made it “ So Pioneers, final words, don’t let the noises distract you. Focus on what matters and what makes a difference in the crypto space and in the world. Keep looking and keep creating , and everything else will follow. Let’s show the world a different path to Crypto and the power of Pi Network in the new year of Open Network” ☺️💐 Let’s #Supportpiapps #piutilities The Times of PiNetwork Pi Network #PiNetwork #PiNetwork2025 #PiNetworkListing

Esther OKO™️

156,836 views • 1 year ago

Does GPT understand the world? Here is what Ilya Sutskever, co-founder of OpenAI, says during a discussion with Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia: (1) When we train a large neural network to accurately predict the next word in lots of different texts from the internet, the AI is learning a world model. (2) On the surface, it may look like learning correlations in text, but it turns out that to 'just learn' statistical correlations in text, to compress information really well, what the neural network learns is some representation of the process that produced the text. (3) This text is a projection of the world...what the neural network is learning is aspects of the world, of people, of the human conditions, their hopes, dreams, motivations, their interactions...the situations we are in. The neural network learns a compressed, abstract, usable representation." Do you think learning representations = understanding? Are large language models simply stochastic parrots, or are they much more?

Does GPT understand the world? Here is what Ilya Sutskever, co-founder of OpenAI, says during a discussion with Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia: (1) When we train a large neural network to accurately predict the next word in lots of different texts from the internet, the AI is learning a world model. (2) On the surface, it may look like learning correlations in text, but it turns out that to 'just learn' statistical correlations in text, to compress information really well, what the neural network learns is some representation of the process that produced the text. (3) This text is a projection of the world...what the neural network is learning is aspects of the world, of people, of the human conditions, their hopes, dreams, motivations, their interactions...the situations we are in. The neural network learns a compressed, abstract, usable representation." Do you think learning representations = understanding? Are large language models simply stochastic parrots, or are they much more?

Alex Ker 🔭

1,367,097 views • 2 years ago

🚨The Chinese government may have seized a sphere similar to the one in Buga Jaime Maussan presents an extraordinary case that has put the international community on alert: the discovery of a mysterious sphere in China with strikingly similar characteristics to the famous Buga Sphere. The sphere was reportedly recovered on April 4, 2026, in a mountainous region of Guangdong. All traces of reports of the sphere were later removed from the internet leading to suspicion that the Chinese government may have seized the sphere. Two photos survived which can be seen in this clip from Jaime Maussan. What do you think, is this a copycat or could it be genuine? #ufotwitter #uapX Jaime Maussan Source:

🚨The Chinese government may have seized a sphere similar to the one in Buga Jaime Maussan presents an extraordinary case that has put the international community on alert: the discovery of a mysterious sphere in China with strikingly similar characteristics to the famous Buga Sphere. The sphere was reportedly recovered on April 4, 2026, in a mountainous region of Guangdong. All traces of reports of the sphere were later removed from the internet leading to suspicion that the Chinese government may have seized the sphere. Two photos survived which can be seen in this clip from Jaime Maussan. What do you think, is this a copycat or could it be genuine? #ufotwitter #uapX Jaime Maussan Source:

Skywatch Signal

14,117 views • 2 months ago

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

Chris Unleashed

288,723 views • 11 months ago