Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

A new update in Lil Durk’s case is starting to shift the conversation. 👀⚖️ While a lot of people online keep saying he’s “cooked,” legal voices are now pushing back on that narrative. Attorney Bradford Cohen recently shared that he actually likes Durk’s chances at trial, saying the case...

trapsntrunks's profile picture

Traps N Trunks

54,535 subscribers

133,728 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

МузыкаНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

LIL DURK’S DEFENSE ATTACKS MURDER-FOR-HIRE CASE: “NO MONEY, NO BOUNTY, NO REWARD” 👀⚖️ Day 1 of opening statements in Lil Durk’s federal trial is already producing some major arguments from the defense. According to a courtroom recap from Ceddy Nash, Durk’s defense pushed back on the government’s alleged murder-for-hire theory, arguing there was no money, bounty or reward connecting Durk to the alleged plot. The defense also reportedly addressed the “don’t book no flights with my name on it” message, arguing it was related to shows rather than the alleged plot. This is only the beginning of the trial, and prosecutors will still have the opportunity to present their evidence and witnesses to the jury. Y’all think the money trail will be the biggest issue for prosecutors in this case? 👀⚖️
3:59

LIL DURK’S DEFENSE ATTACKS MURDER-FOR-HIRE CASE: “NO MONEY, NO BOUNTY, NO REWARD” 👀⚖️ Day 1 of opening statements in Lil Durk’s federal trial is already producing some major arguments from the defense. According to a courtroom recap from Ceddy Nash, Durk’s defense pushed back on the government’s alleged murder-for-hire theory, arguing there was no money, bounty or reward connecting Durk to the alleged plot. The defense also reportedly addressed the “don’t book no flights with my name on it” message, arguing it was related to shows rather than the alleged plot. This is only the beginning of the trial, and prosecutors will still have the opportunity to present their evidence and witnesses to the jury. Y’all think the money trail will be the biggest issue for prosecutors in this case? 👀⚖️

Traps N Trunks

64,828 просмотров • 3 дней назад

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."
1:27

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."

Eric Daugherty

140,799 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Q: How confident are you that the Comey case will result in a conviction? Blanche: "I'm certainly not going to act like I have a crystal ball and predict what will happen with that case at trial. But it is enough to say that this is the case that was returned by the grand jury."
1:12

Q: How confident are you that the Comey case will result in a conviction? Blanche: "I'm certainly not going to act like I have a crystal ball and predict what will happen with that case at trial. But it is enough to say that this is the case that was returned by the grand jury."

The Bulwark

45,043 просмотров • 15 дней назад

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat | On the Gyanvapi case, Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain says, "In the Gyanvapi case, the matter is subjudice in the Supreme Court. A 'Shivling' was found there on May 16, 2022, and the Allahabad HC ordered an ASI investigation. On May 19, 2023, the Supreme Court stayed that order. The case is going on at a slow pace in the trial court. The reason for this is that on 12 December 2024, the Supreme Court passed an order that no survey order will be passed in any case and no effective orders will be made in any trial, until this matter of the Place of Worship Act is decided. A huge obstacle has arisen due to this... The Muslim side does not have any proof, and the same is true in the Ram Mandir case, be it Gyanvapi or Mathura's Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi; in any case, they could not provide any proof except saying that they have been offering namaz there for the last few years... I want to clearly state that if you enter the premises of a temple and forcibly offer namaz, then the existence of the temple does not end, and the Supreme Court has also held this issue in the Ram Mandir case..."
1:22

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat | On the Gyanvapi case, Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain says, "In the Gyanvapi case, the matter is subjudice in the Supreme Court. A 'Shivling' was found there on May 16, 2022, and the Allahabad HC ordered an ASI investigation. On May 19, 2023, the Supreme Court stayed that order. The case is going on at a slow pace in the trial court. The reason for this is that on 12 December 2024, the Supreme Court passed an order that no survey order will be passed in any case and no effective orders will be made in any trial, until this matter of the Place of Worship Act is decided. A huge obstacle has arisen due to this... The Muslim side does not have any proof, and the same is true in the Ram Mandir case, be it Gyanvapi or Mathura's Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi; in any case, they could not provide any proof except saying that they have been offering namaz there for the last few years... I want to clearly state that if you enter the premises of a temple and forcibly offer namaz, then the existence of the temple does not end, and the Supreme Court has also held this issue in the Ram Mandir case..."

ANI

19,836 просмотров • 1 год назад

How NHS Lawyers Broke Whistleblowing Law for Doctors (and their patients) What happened here is so simple that It took 2 MPs just one and a half minutes to explain to the House of Commons. Making public money, stating things in court that are not true whilst not disclosing documents that would have exposed this is not a complicated concept. HEE have now moved to NHS England under a new name with the same leadership and still have the same power over the nation's doctors. In 2022, yet again these people escaped accountability for this case by pulling another legal stunt that was swallowed by a Judge leaving only HEE's lawyers left in the case following this wasted cost application. Do you want these people to get away with this? If not click on our CrowdJustice page and back our wasted cost litigation against the NHS lawyers that did this. What more will they turn a blind eye to in my NHS whistleblowing case?
1:33

How NHS Lawyers Broke Whistleblowing Law for Doctors (and their patients) What happened here is so simple that It took 2 MPs just one and a half minutes to explain to the House of Commons. Making public money, stating things in court that are not true whilst not disclosing documents that would have exposed this is not a complicated concept. HEE have now moved to NHS England under a new name with the same leadership and still have the same power over the nation's doctors. In 2022, yet again these people escaped accountability for this case by pulling another legal stunt that was swallowed by a Judge leaving only HEE's lawyers left in the case following this wasted cost application. Do you want these people to get away with this? If not click on our CrowdJustice page and back our wasted cost litigation against the NHS lawyers that did this. What more will they turn a blind eye to in my NHS whistleblowing case?

Dr Chris Day

17,765 просмотров • 1 год назад

A recent landmark case in New York awarded $2 million to a person who had her breast removed at 16. Jonathan Butcher says this case could have a ripple effect across the medical community. “According to the details of the case, the doctors involved pressured both the young lady and her parents to do this procedure without looking at what the underlying issues may be.” “And actually, this is quite common in the research that you find that those who say they were born in the wrong body often have underlying issues of anxiety and depression.” “And without dealing with those issues, you’re really not helping that young person.” “We don’t allow young people to diagnose themselves with a sprained ankle or with pneumonia or a strep throat.” “Medical associations are now saying that they opposed these surgeries to young people.” “I think that this particular case is going to have a ripple effect across the medical community.”
2:03

A recent landmark case in New York awarded $2 million to a person who had her breast removed at 16. Jonathan Butcher says this case could have a ripple effect across the medical community. “According to the details of the case, the doctors involved pressured both the young lady and her parents to do this procedure without looking at what the underlying issues may be.” “And actually, this is quite common in the research that you find that those who say they were born in the wrong body often have underlying issues of anxiety and depression.” “And without dealing with those issues, you’re really not helping that young person.” “We don’t allow young people to diagnose themselves with a sprained ankle or with pneumonia or a strep throat.” “Medical associations are now saying that they opposed these surgeries to young people.” “I think that this particular case is going to have a ripple effect across the medical community.”

Jan Jekielek

12,035 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege
36:28

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege

Brian Harrison

27,671 просмотров • 1 год назад

6ix9ine insists lawyer Moe Gangat is "loud and wrong" for covering the Lil Durk trial and Moe responds. On Tuesday (Aug. 25), Tekashi shared a post on Instagram criticizing Moe's daily coverage of Durk's legal case. "Stop listening to this ni**a right here," 69 said in the video before sharing clips of Moe offering opinions on the Pooh Shiesty case. "This ni**a is not a lawyer. He gets everything wrong." "LOUD AND WRONG KEEP BELIEVING THESE INSTAGRAM LAWYERS," 6ix9ine captioned the post. A short time later, Moe responded. According to his LinkedIn page, Moe has a law degree from Georgetown, has been practicing law for over a decade and has his own employment law firm in New York. He defended his reporting. "This page is not into the gossip and the rumors," Moe said before taking a shot at Tekashi. "As you remember, we covered your case. And we covered how you had a lot of defenses and there was very little evidence against you. And then we heard how you snitched and cooperated."
2:32

6ix9ine insists lawyer Moe Gangat is "loud and wrong" for covering the Lil Durk trial and Moe responds. On Tuesday (Aug. 25), Tekashi shared a post on Instagram criticizing Moe's daily coverage of Durk's legal case. "Stop listening to this ni**a right here," 69 said in the video before sharing clips of Moe offering opinions on the Pooh Shiesty case. "This ni**a is not a lawyer. He gets everything wrong." "LOUD AND WRONG KEEP BELIEVING THESE INSTAGRAM LAWYERS," 6ix9ine captioned the post. A short time later, Moe responded. According to his LinkedIn page, Moe has a law degree from Georgetown, has been practicing law for over a decade and has his own employment law firm in New York. He defended his reporting. "This page is not into the gossip and the rumors," Moe said before taking a shot at Tekashi. "As you remember, we covered your case. And we covered how you had a lot of defenses and there was very little evidence against you. And then we heard how you snitched and cooperated."

XXL Magazine

76,548 просмотров • 1 день назад

Joe Borelli: “The prosecutor pointed out in his filing that it is not inherently a crime to challenge the results of an election or question the results. You are allowed to do that. In fact, most states have a legal procedure. Having a legal procedure is the opposite of it being illegal. He actually followed the case.” “He was supposed to find another prosecutor to take the case and he could not find a single prosecutor in the state of Georgia that said this was a valid case against the President.”
0:51

Joe Borelli: “The prosecutor pointed out in his filing that it is not inherently a crime to challenge the results of an election or question the results. You are allowed to do that. In fact, most states have a legal procedure. Having a legal procedure is the opposite of it being illegal. He actually followed the case.” “He was supposed to find another prosecutor to take the case and he could not find a single prosecutor in the state of Georgia that said this was a valid case against the President.”

RedWave Press

54,599 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

In light of the names Anneke Lucas mentioned, like the former Canadian prime minister who is dead now, but is the father of the current one. It is being shared all over the internet now. Canadian accounts are posting this, and it is getting lots of attention. This is also a wake-up call for Canada. A lot of people in Canada are commenting on social media that they are shocked by this guy being named. But actually he was already mentioned by Cathy O'Brien in 1995, as being involved in these networks! See the video below. So there is corroboration between these witnesses. A lot of these former and now deceased prime ministers she mentions were, at that time that she was in it in the 70s, involved in this. Also the Belgian one that Anneke names, and was also named by other witnesses. Which tells us, like these witnesses say, this was a global network. So the truth was already out there a bit, but it is coming out more for a bigger public. We will have more revelations coming out in 2025 about these dark dealing that have been going on at the highest levels, I'm sure. This is going to be a shock for a lot of people that are new to this information, because it is reaching a bigger public. Some will choose not to believe it, do no research, and look no further. But a lot more people will wake up to this, it is unstoppable. Of course, we have to check in with our own vibration. If it gets too heavy, take some time out and go for a walk in nature. Whilst revelations are important for the truth to come out, and confronting hard information is part of that, we have to check with our selves how this information is affecting us, and sometimes we need a time off. It is always most important to maintain a healthy balance between checking in with this information and our own peace of mind. #Epstein #PBDpodcast
1:42

In light of the names Anneke Lucas mentioned, like the former Canadian prime minister who is dead now, but is the father of the current one. It is being shared all over the internet now. Canadian accounts are posting this, and it is getting lots of attention. This is also a wake-up call for Canada. A lot of people in Canada are commenting on social media that they are shocked by this guy being named. But actually he was already mentioned by Cathy O'Brien in 1995, as being involved in these networks! See the video below. So there is corroboration between these witnesses. A lot of these former and now deceased prime ministers she mentions were, at that time that she was in it in the 70s, involved in this. Also the Belgian one that Anneke names, and was also named by other witnesses. Which tells us, like these witnesses say, this was a global network. So the truth was already out there a bit, but it is coming out more for a bigger public. We will have more revelations coming out in 2025 about these dark dealing that have been going on at the highest levels, I'm sure. This is going to be a shock for a lot of people that are new to this information, because it is reaching a bigger public. Some will choose not to believe it, do no research, and look no further. But a lot more people will wake up to this, it is unstoppable. Of course, we have to check in with our own vibration. If it gets too heavy, take some time out and go for a walk in nature. Whilst revelations are important for the truth to come out, and confronting hard information is part of that, we have to check with our selves how this information is affecting us, and sometimes we need a time off. It is always most important to maintain a healthy balance between checking in with this information and our own peace of mind. #Epstein #PBDpodcast

Jens Patteeuw

20,426 просмотров • 1 год назад

Charleston White back at it again 👀 this time he’s doubling down on everything he said about Montana 700 and not backing off it at all. He claims he was really there that night at the club during the album release and says what went down wasn’t no rumor — he’s standing on it 💯 In his response, Charleston even breaks down how it allegedly played out, saying a club situation turned into a whole scene and Montana 700 got caught in the middle while security and others couldn’t control it. He also throws in that if it wasn’t true, he wouldn’t even be speaking on it like this… basically calling anybody saying he’s lying straight cap 😳 Now the internet split — some people saying Charleston just talking like always, others saying he too detailed for it to be made up 🤔 Y’all think Charleston White really witnessed all this… or he just stirring it up again? 👀🔥
3:35

Charleston White back at it again 👀 this time he’s doubling down on everything he said about Montana 700 and not backing off it at all. He claims he was really there that night at the club during the album release and says what went down wasn’t no rumor — he’s standing on it 💯 In his response, Charleston even breaks down how it allegedly played out, saying a club situation turned into a whole scene and Montana 700 got caught in the middle while security and others couldn’t control it. He also throws in that if it wasn’t true, he wouldn’t even be speaking on it like this… basically calling anybody saying he’s lying straight cap 😳 Now the internet split — some people saying Charleston just talking like always, others saying he too detailed for it to be made up 🤔 Y’all think Charleston White really witnessed all this… or he just stirring it up again? 👀🔥

Traps N Trunks

83,690 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Whatever situation is there in Delhi today, The Modi government & Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is Responsible for it. This interview of Dharmendra Pradhan is a month old, before the protest started. Now if this government had conveyed this information to the people on time. If people had been able to see this interview and this video at that time, then they would not have been brainwashed so quickly. Perhaps this situation would not have arisen. The Modi government & BJP do not know how to convey their message to the people. This is all that is needed Even now, if the Modi government had done this, then at least such a situation would not have arisen in the future.
0:48

Whatever situation is there in Delhi today, The Modi government & Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is Responsible for it. This interview of Dharmendra Pradhan is a month old, before the protest started. Now if this government had conveyed this information to the people on time. If people had been able to see this interview and this video at that time, then they would not have been brainwashed so quickly. Perhaps this situation would not have arisen. The Modi government & BJP do not know how to convey their message to the people. This is all that is needed Even now, if the Modi government had done this, then at least such a situation would not have arisen in the future.

Ajay Sphere 🇮🇳

126,950 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

AOC The other issue that I have with people saying that, “Oh, you’re doing this too late. You should have done this a long time ago.” Don’t you think a lot of people would have? This cost the amount of a used car. When you are young, you are broke. That’s like rolling up to a 25-year-old and saying, “Why don’t you buy a house?” How can you even tell someone or chastise someone about the timing in which they do this when health insurance doesn’t even cover it? It’s not even a financial option for people at a younger age. I’m doing this at 36 because I can afford it, and I have saved for it, and my biology is compatible with it, and I want to. So be mad.
0:52

AOC The other issue that I have with people saying that, “Oh, you’re doing this too late. You should have done this a long time ago.” Don’t you think a lot of people would have? This cost the amount of a used car. When you are young, you are broke. That’s like rolling up to a 25-year-old and saying, “Why don’t you buy a house?” How can you even tell someone or chastise someone about the timing in which they do this when health insurance doesn’t even cover it? It’s not even a financial option for people at a younger age. I’m doing this at 36 because I can afford it, and I have saved for it, and my biology is compatible with it, and I want to. So be mad.

Acyn

401,660 просмотров • 13 дней назад

#WATCH | Delhi: On the arrest of Vinesh Chandel, co-founder of I-PAC, Advocate Vikas Pahwa says, "I think he was arrested somewhere around 7.45 in the evening, and the family was informed that he'll be taken to the Patiala House Court. So we all reached there around 9.30, knowing that he would be produced there. Later on, we learned that he will be produced in the residence of the special judge of Patiala House... Then the hearing took place late at night till about 12 o'clock, and then the order was dictated, and the order was released somewhere around 4 or 5 AM. First thing which I would like to point out is that when an accused is arrested at 7.45 in the evening, you have 24 hours to produce him in the court. There was a need to take an accused at midnight in an odd hour, requesting a judge to take up the matter... Second is that this person is the director of a company called I-PAC. IPAC is a company which helps the political party in conducting elections... This company does not have any ideology. They have given advice to the BJP, Congress and various other parties. It's part of their job. We all know that elections are happening in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. This company is advising political parties there. The involvement of this company came for the first time on 8th January, when their offices were raided in West Bengal, and the case, which was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate at that point in time is a case with regard to the coal scam, which is from 2020, about six years back. Those cases have already been investigated. Chargesheets have been filed. Prosecution complaints have been filed by the ED. Still, the ED used that case to conduct a search. Although I-PAC had nothing to do with those cases. They called the directors for an investigation. Two of the directors, one who was stationed in Tamil Nadu, the other who was stationed in West Bengal, both challenged those summons in the Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Court hearing is going on. It was going on even till yesterday, and now the case is listed for Friday. While the Delhi High Court is hearing the issuance of summons to the directors of the IPAC. These new cases have been registered. I presume that the new case where the allegation made by enforcement directorate is with regard to cheating and conspiracy, and falsification of accounts. When we see the allegations, which they have now shared with us, we have realised that no offence of cheating is made out in this case, and the allegations are very vague. Even if we accept the allegation, it's a violation under the Income Tax Act, which is not a scheduled offence. There's an allegation of GST not being paid, which is again a GST violation, which is not a scheduled offence. So it looks, prima facie, as a lawyer to me, that all these allegations which are now being made in the predicate offence FIR, now registered by EOW, and the Enforcement Directorate, the ECIR, which is registered by ED, no cognisable offence is made out..."
7:46

#WATCH | Delhi: On the arrest of Vinesh Chandel, co-founder of I-PAC, Advocate Vikas Pahwa says, "I think he was arrested somewhere around 7.45 in the evening, and the family was informed that he'll be taken to the Patiala House Court. So we all reached there around 9.30, knowing that he would be produced there. Later on, we learned that he will be produced in the residence of the special judge of Patiala House... Then the hearing took place late at night till about 12 o'clock, and then the order was dictated, and the order was released somewhere around 4 or 5 AM. First thing which I would like to point out is that when an accused is arrested at 7.45 in the evening, you have 24 hours to produce him in the court. There was a need to take an accused at midnight in an odd hour, requesting a judge to take up the matter... Second is that this person is the director of a company called I-PAC. IPAC is a company which helps the political party in conducting elections... This company does not have any ideology. They have given advice to the BJP, Congress and various other parties. It's part of their job. We all know that elections are happening in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. This company is advising political parties there. The involvement of this company came for the first time on 8th January, when their offices were raided in West Bengal, and the case, which was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate at that point in time is a case with regard to the coal scam, which is from 2020, about six years back. Those cases have already been investigated. Chargesheets have been filed. Prosecution complaints have been filed by the ED. Still, the ED used that case to conduct a search. Although I-PAC had nothing to do with those cases. They called the directors for an investigation. Two of the directors, one who was stationed in Tamil Nadu, the other who was stationed in West Bengal, both challenged those summons in the Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Court hearing is going on. It was going on even till yesterday, and now the case is listed for Friday. While the Delhi High Court is hearing the issuance of summons to the directors of the IPAC. These new cases have been registered. I presume that the new case where the allegation made by enforcement directorate is with regard to cheating and conspiracy, and falsification of accounts. When we see the allegations, which they have now shared with us, we have realised that no offence of cheating is made out in this case, and the allegations are very vague. Even if we accept the allegation, it's a violation under the Income Tax Act, which is not a scheduled offence. There's an allegation of GST not being paid, which is again a GST violation, which is not a scheduled offence. So it looks, prima facie, as a lawyer to me, that all these allegations which are now being made in the predicate offence FIR, now registered by EOW, and the Enforcement Directorate, the ECIR, which is registered by ED, no cognisable offence is made out..."

ANI

47,046 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

'I think that they have people of interest - meaning people they're interested in. I think they have suspects that they're looking at because they're people that might be suspects... but that's very different from identifying a specific individual and saying, 'We think this is the person.'' CNN's John Miller reacts to investigators saying there are no suspects yet in the Nancy Guthrie case.
0:52

'I think that they have people of interest - meaning people they're interested in. I think they have suspects that they're looking at because they're people that might be suspects... but that's very different from identifying a specific individual and saying, 'We think this is the person.'' CNN's John Miller reacts to investigators saying there are no suspects yet in the Nancy Guthrie case.

The Lead CNN

36,409 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This Remote Viewer Just Dropped a BOMBSHELL Warning of an UNEXPECTED Future U.S. President Change?! Edward Riordan was tasked to look at the future president of 2030 and the data that came back was surprising: "...the idea here is of a new leader stepping in. The person is ripe for the time and timing, feeding off of the angst of the people. This feels like a major shift. But why? I had to wonder. This person will come to power and signify a new phase has begun. This feels future based. Like this plan is being arranged and the person is being groomed now." "...Not not too far out. There seems to be more prep for the individual and the situation that is needed, but I had to wonder what kind of situation are we talking about here? And it seemed crisis based, like someone is brought down in this person is brought in...." "...it feels like a large shift in the structure of things in order out of chaos scenario like Venezuela, a chaotic environment that is being orchestrated into order." "...This person, this person is being presented for this time to the people and the world to see.... But here was this person. They were on a stage, but they didn't have a face. It was very, very strange. They didn't even have a they didn't have a face for some reason." "...It's like the death of a king or a ruler. The country stops. The world stops for a moment. An example would be if something happened to President Trump, the world would stop for a moment. This level of magnitude, the people don't know what to do next." "...Taking advantage of a heightened emotional state to push propaganda and a narrative, this person steps in at a high emotion period with a strong sense of filling someone's shoes or replacing them, possibly due to a death...."
3:41

This Remote Viewer Just Dropped a BOMBSHELL Warning of an UNEXPECTED Future U.S. President Change?! Edward Riordan was tasked to look at the future president of 2030 and the data that came back was surprising: "...the idea here is of a new leader stepping in. The person is ripe for the time and timing, feeding off of the angst of the people. This feels like a major shift. But why? I had to wonder. This person will come to power and signify a new phase has begun. This feels future based. Like this plan is being arranged and the person is being groomed now." "...Not not too far out. There seems to be more prep for the individual and the situation that is needed, but I had to wonder what kind of situation are we talking about here? And it seemed crisis based, like someone is brought down in this person is brought in...." "...it feels like a large shift in the structure of things in order out of chaos scenario like Venezuela, a chaotic environment that is being orchestrated into order." "...This person, this person is being presented for this time to the people and the world to see.... But here was this person. They were on a stage, but they didn't have a face. It was very, very strange. They didn't even have a they didn't have a face for some reason." "...It's like the death of a king or a ruler. The country stops. The world stops for a moment. An example would be if something happened to President Trump, the world would stop for a moment. This level of magnitude, the people don't know what to do next." "...Taking advantage of a heightened emotional state to push propaganda and a narrative, this person steps in at a high emotion period with a strong sense of filling someone's shoes or replacing them, possibly due to a death...."

Future Forecasting Group

64,699 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Warnock: You literally have, in real time, the leader of another nation-state—in this case, South Africa—there to talk to him about trade, and he’s saying, “Sorry, Mr. President, we don’t have a plane to offer you.” And you see why we have an Emoluments Clause in the first place. This is a matter of national security. This is a matter of the credibility of the United States on the world stage. And this is a dark and dismal moment for our country.
1:09

Warnock: You literally have, in real time, the leader of another nation-state—in this case, South Africa—there to talk to him about trade, and he’s saying, “Sorry, Mr. President, we don’t have a plane to offer you.” And you see why we have an Emoluments Clause in the first place. This is a matter of national security. This is a matter of the credibility of the United States on the world stage. And this is a dark and dismal moment for our country.

Acyn

481,613 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 NANCY GUTHRIE ABDUCTION CASE JUST TOOK A DARK TURN — LEAD DETECTIVE HAD “NEVER INVESTIGATED A HOMICIDE BEFORE” New details are coming out and people are asking how this was even allowed to happen. According to a source close to the case: • The lead detective has never investigated a homicide before • The first investigators on scene are inexperienced • The initial response team lacks real homicide background This isn’t a routine call. This is the case involving Savannah Guthrie’s mother, Nancy Guthrie, where the first hours are everything. And somehow… this is who was put in charge? This is when: • Evidence is secured • Witness timelines are built • Mistakes become permanent And those early decisions may have been made by people learning in real time. So what the hell happened here? Who signed off on this? And why was a homicide scene handled like on-the-job training? At what point does this stop being incompetence and start being something else?
1:19

🚨 NANCY GUTHRIE ABDUCTION CASE JUST TOOK A DARK TURN — LEAD DETECTIVE HAD “NEVER INVESTIGATED A HOMICIDE BEFORE” New details are coming out and people are asking how this was even allowed to happen. According to a source close to the case: • The lead detective has never investigated a homicide before • The first investigators on scene are inexperienced • The initial response team lacks real homicide background This isn’t a routine call. This is the case involving Savannah Guthrie’s mother, Nancy Guthrie, where the first hours are everything. And somehow… this is who was put in charge? This is when: • Evidence is secured • Witness timelines are built • Mistakes become permanent And those early decisions may have been made by people learning in real time. So what the hell happened here? Who signed off on this? And why was a homicide scene handled like on-the-job training? At what point does this stop being incompetence and start being something else?

HustleBitch

54,014 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад