Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A QUANT DOESN'T GUESS IF BITCOIN GOES UP OR DOWN, HE SIMULATES TEN THOUSAND FUTURES AND COUNTS THE ONES THAT HIT The secret is one line. P(up) = (1/N) · Σ 𝟙(Sₜ > K) Run thousands of price paths from now to expiry using current volatility, then count the... fraction that finish above the line. That fraction is the real probability, not a vibe. SpectraView runs this on the 15m Bitcoin Up/Down markets and pushes the setup straight to TG with 81% win rate. Start auto trade 15m BTC -> In plain words. You are not calling up or down, you are measuring the odds, then only betting when the market price is cheaper than the odds you measured. On screen the sim lands near 53% in the money. Edge is not being right more often, it is paying 50 cents for something the math says is worth 53.show more

slash1s

11,915 subscribers

63,862 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A bot made $669,264 in a month betting on Bitcoin Up or Down right now it's one of the most profitable bots on Polymarket It profits off panic buying/selling by crypto investors by basically acting as a market maker for the up/down markets Here's how its algorithm works: based on the last 10 trades it determines the fair value -> accumulates YES if the price is above fair value (otherwise accumulates NO) -> earns from the spread if you want alerts + copy trade his actions: Examples of its wins: - $60,941 on Bitcoin Up or Down - February 9, 9:00AM-9:15AM ET at 28 cents - $43,671 on Bitcoin Up or Down - January 19, 5AM ET at 36 cents - $38,793 on Bitcoin Up or Down - February 6, 3:30PM-3:45PM ET at 26 cents This bot is a clear proof that Bitcoin up or down markets are some of the best to trade, because they're simple and profitable In my recent article I also covered other best markets to trade on Polymarket 👇

A bot made $669,264 in a month betting on Bitcoin Up or Down right now it's one of the most profitable bots on Polymarket It profits off panic buying/selling by crypto investors by basically acting as a market maker for the up/down markets Here's how its algorithm works: based on the last 10 trades it determines the fair value -> accumulates YES if the price is above fair value (otherwise accumulates NO) -> earns from the spread if you want alerts + copy trade his actions: Examples of its wins: - $60,941 on Bitcoin Up or Down - February 9, 9:00AM-9:15AM ET at 28 cents - $43,671 on Bitcoin Up or Down - January 19, 5AM ET at 36 cents - $38,793 on Bitcoin Up or Down - February 6, 3:30PM-3:45PM ET at 26 cents This bot is a clear proof that Bitcoin up or down markets are some of the best to trade, because they're simple and profitable In my recent article I also covered other best markets to trade on Polymarket 👇

Paone

14,206 views • 7 months ago

BREAKING: Cathie Wood (CEO of Ark Invest) says #Bitcoin "is becoming even more scarce than gold. The difference is, when the gold price goes up, as it has, production goes up, the rate of increase in the supply goes up — that can not happen with Bitcoin.”

BREAKING: Cathie Wood (CEO of Ark Invest) says #Bitcoin "is becoming even more scarce than gold. The difference is, when the gold price goes up, as it has, production goes up, the rate of increase in the supply goes up — that can not happen with Bitcoin.”

Swan

61,433 views • 1 year ago

$28,669 in a single day on Bitcoin Up or Down. Today’s round: price to beat 93,506 BTC trading well below the line while odds barely adjust. That gap is exactly what blubberbuster keeps exploiting on Polymarket. He trades only Bitcoin, but the model compounds hard his monthly total is now 304,490.38. Same pattern every session: → waits for the micro drift → enters before the market recalculates → exits as the line finally catches up When the feed moves faster than the pricing, this is what happens.

$28,669 in a single day on Bitcoin Up or Down. Today’s round: price to beat 93,506 BTC trading well below the line while odds barely adjust. That gap is exactly what blubberbuster keeps exploiting on Polymarket. He trades only Bitcoin, but the model compounds hard his monthly total is now 304,490.38. Same pattern every session: → waits for the micro drift → enters before the market recalculates → exits as the line finally catches up When the feed moves faster than the pricing, this is what happens.

Carver

20,441 views • 9 months ago

🚨 BITCOIN JUST TOUCHED THE ONE LEVEL THAT HAS ENDED EVERY BEAR MARKET. It is not a moving average. It is the cost to produce a Bitcoin. Right now that sits near $64,000. Every time price falls to this line, it bounces. The reason is simple. Miners stop selling below their own cost. Supply dries up exactly where price is now. That is how the floor forms. We are standing on it.

🚨 BITCOIN JUST TOUCHED THE ONE LEVEL THAT HAS ENDED EVERY BEAR MARKET. It is not a moving average. It is the cost to produce a Bitcoin. Right now that sits near $64,000. Every time price falls to this line, it bounces. The reason is simple. Miners stop selling below their own cost. Supply dries up exactly where price is now. That is how the floor forms. We are standing on it.

Mister Crypto

15,871 views • 2 months ago

Math quant bot on Polymarket made over $457K PnL in 20 days - he turned $7,387 → $457k profit it uses Markov Chains to find "mispriced" windows on BTC and ETH up/down markets - made 14,200+ predictions, with ~$22,850 avg. daily profit by exploiting gaps humans miss at 3AM strategy: a 1h BTC/ETH up/down market is a binary contract it pays $1 if event happens → $0 if not Markov Chains give you the probability of the next market state based on: > current state of the market (up / down / flat) > transition matrix built from live price data > diagonal persistence value - how stable the current state is formula: p̂ − market_price ≥ 0.05 AND P(j, j) ≥ 0.87 bot profile: - read article below to understand how Markov Chains are used to extract edge from prediction markets

bodila

68,402 views • 5 months ago

this quant made $1,293,914 trading Bitcoin up-or-down using a system reverse-engineered from Jane Street's own playbook remember my last post on the Jane Street quant whose code makes the fund $75,000 a minute? this guy rebuilt that logic for himself his profile: here's the part most people miss: he's not guessing the next candle the system runs Bitcoin forward through thousands of scenarios at once and only fires when the math says the trade has an edge the exact same principle Jane Street runs at scale: tiny edge, repeated thousands of times, until it becomes profit that's the whole game on wall street. he just pointed it at a market anyone can access the catch: right now it's mostly individual wallets running this. the funds haven't moved in yet that window is what makes it work. once the crowd catches up, the edge thins out you can build your own from the lecture. or skip the homework and mirror his entries here:

Paone

54,163 views • 3 months ago

The Quant Who Turned Shannon's 77-Year-Old Formula Into +$555K in 30 Days He's not betting on crypto. He's compressing its uncertainty - one bit at a time His strategy: Shannon → Kelly → Crypto Up/Down The Formula D_KL(P ∥ Q) = Σ p(xᵢ) · log₂ [ p(xᵢ) / q(xᵢ) ] P = his model. Q = the market price. The result = how many bits of information he has that the market doesn't. That number IS the edge KL > 0.10 bits → Pro zone. Trade KL > 0.30 bits → Insane edge or bad math Every position is a binary, ultra-short crypto market: BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP - Up or Down on 5-min and hourly windows The same playground Shannon's math was built for Fastest way to copy-trade him even with $10 using: Kelly Sizing Position size scales with edge in bits: - High conviction (BTC Down 58.9¢): 2,999 shares - Medium (ETH Down 63.9¢): 900 shares - Long-tail (XRP Up 17.1¢): 158 shares Same recipe Thorp used to run 20 seasons with zero losing years While retail argues vibes on 5-min candles, this wallet runs KL-divergence and Kelly - 33,795 times in a row

The Quant Who Turned Shannon's 77-Year-Old Formula Into +$555K in 30 Days He's not betting on crypto. He's compressing its uncertainty - one bit at a time His strategy: Shannon → Kelly → Crypto Up/Down The Formula D_KL(P ∥ Q) = Σ p(xᵢ) · log₂ [ p(xᵢ) / q(xᵢ) ] P = his model. Q = the market price. The result = how many bits of information he has that the market doesn't. That number IS the edge KL > 0.10 bits → Pro zone. Trade KL > 0.30 bits → Insane edge or bad math Every position is a binary, ultra-short crypto market: BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP - Up or Down on 5-min and hourly windows The same playground Shannon's math was built for Fastest way to copy-trade him even with $10 using: Kelly Sizing Position size scales with edge in bits: - High conviction (BTC Down 58.9¢): 2,999 shares - Medium (ETH Down 63.9¢): 900 shares - Long-tail (XRP Up 17.1¢): 158 shares Same recipe Thorp used to run 20 seasons with zero losing years While retail argues vibes on 5-min candles, this wallet runs KL-divergence and Kelly - 33,795 times in a row

0xRicker

12,755 views • 4 months ago

This HFT bot is about to cross $1M profit trading 5-min BTC markets and making $10,000/day I traced his trades using Claude → backtested the strategy on 72M trades dataset the edge is that he runs both sides of the same window at once, then lets a probability model decide where the real money is that's the floor. the edge on top is directional: edge = fair_prob - market_price for each window the bot estimates the true probability BTC moves a direction in the next few minutes then fades the crowd when the price disagrees. that's why his fills run from 21¢ longshots to 99¢ near-locks across BTC and ETH Profile:

Ricker

24,662 views • 3 months ago

🚨 BILLIONAIRE GRANT CARDONE ON BITCOIN RIGHT NOW: "Dude, I'd buy it right here. I believe it's underpriced right now. I think it should be $150K today. Maybe 180K, 190K." Cardone is down roughly $31 million on his $184 million Bitcoin position at current prices. He just said buy more. Not averaging down out of desperation. Out of conviction that the current price is wrong. $150K to $190K is where he thinks it should be today. It is at $60K That gap is either the opportunity of the cycle or the most expensive conviction in the room. He is betting it is the opportunity.

🚨 BILLIONAIRE GRANT CARDONE ON BITCOIN RIGHT NOW: "Dude, I'd buy it right here. I believe it's underpriced right now. I think it should be $150K today. Maybe 180K, 190K." Cardone is down roughly $31 million on his $184 million Bitcoin position at current prices. He just said buy more. Not averaging down out of desperation. Out of conviction that the current price is wrong. $150K to $190K is where he thinks it should be today. It is at $60K That gap is either the opportunity of the cycle or the most expensive conviction in the room. He is betting it is the opportunity.

WOLF Bitcoin

38,814 views • 2 months ago

What happens if Bitcoin goes to $1,000,000 in 8 years and MSTR never issues another senior or preferred share? No new leverage. No new preferred stack. No mNAV expansion. Just Bitcoin going up and the current structure sitting there. At $63.2k BTC: MSTR implied price: ~$95.71 CEBE: ~143,535 sats/share CEBE mNAV: 1.055x At $1,000,000 BTC, with the exact same mNAV: MSTR implied price: ~$2,086 CEBE: ~197,678 sats/share Bitcoin return: 15.8x MSTR return: 21.8x That is ~38% more return than Bitcoin. Why? Because the senior/preferred claim stack is fixed in dollars. As Bitcoin rises, that claim stack collapses in BTC terms: ~310,379 BTC of senior claims today → ~19,616 BTC at $1M Bitcoin The common equity absorbs the difference. This is what you are getting in exchange for paying the STRC dividends. AMPLIFICATION of BITCOIN. This is what the market keeps missing. MSTR does not need the multiple to expand to outperform Bitcoin. It can outperform because fixed-dollar claims get nuked in Bitcoin terms. CEBE is the lens. Bitcoin is the detonator:

What happens if Bitcoin goes to $1,000,000 in 8 years and MSTR never issues another senior or preferred share? No new leverage. No new preferred stack. No mNAV expansion. Just Bitcoin going up and the current structure sitting there. At $63.2k BTC: MSTR implied price: ~$95.71 CEBE: ~143,535 sats/share CEBE mNAV: 1.055x At $1,000,000 BTC, with the exact same mNAV: MSTR implied price: ~$2,086 CEBE: ~197,678 sats/share Bitcoin return: 15.8x MSTR return: 21.8x That is ~38% more return than Bitcoin. Why? Because the senior/preferred claim stack is fixed in dollars. As Bitcoin rises, that claim stack collapses in BTC terms: ~310,379 BTC of senior claims today → ~19,616 BTC at $1M Bitcoin The common equity absorbs the difference. This is what you are getting in exchange for paying the STRC dividends. AMPLIFICATION of BITCOIN. This is what the market keeps missing. MSTR does not need the multiple to expand to outperform Bitcoin. It can outperform because fixed-dollar claims get nuked in Bitcoin terms. CEBE is the lens. Bitcoin is the detonator:

Adam Livingston

104,266 views • 2 months ago

This guy made $600,000 on Polymarket using software, buying markets for $20 His trading bot makes 2,774 trades per hour or 46 trades per minute. He trades the divergence between Binance/Chainlink data and people’s reaction on Polymarket. His strategy is simple: > Enters positions only with limit orders > Works as both maker and taker > Buys Up or Down while the probability on Polymarket has not yet caught up with the current price on Binance/Chainlink Here is the link to this guy’s account: You can track smart money via the TG bot:

This guy made $600,000 on Polymarket using software, buying markets for $20 His trading bot makes 2,774 trades per hour or 46 trades per minute. He trades the divergence between Binance/Chainlink data and people’s reaction on Polymarket. His strategy is simple: > Enters positions only with limit orders > Works as both maker and taker > Buys Up or Down while the probability on Polymarket has not yet caught up with the current price on Binance/Chainlink Here is the link to this guy’s account: You can track smart money via the TG bot:

VALIX

15,875 views • 7 months ago

$this formula decides who survives in trading everyone argues about what to buy. almost nobody argues about how much f* = (bp - q) / b p and q are your win rate and your loss rate. if the edge isn't positive, f* comes out zero. bet nothing. most traders don't have a zero setting b is the payoff. edge divided by odds. strong conviction on a bad payout still gets you a small position f* is a fraction of the account, never a dollar amount. wins scale the next bet up, losses scale it down. you can shrink forever and never actually hit zero now the part that kills people a real, provable, positive edge will still bankrupt you if you size it wrong. the chart below is the same 400 trades run twice. same win rate. same edge. 10% sizing compounds to 110k. 30% sizing ends at 52 dollars it doesn't blow up because it was wrong. it blows up because it was right too big being right is the cheap part$

this formula decides who survives in trading everyone argues about what to buy. almost nobody argues about how much f* = (bp - q) / b p and q are your win rate and your loss rate. if the edge isn't positive, f* comes out zero. bet nothing. most traders don't have a zero setting b is the payoff. edge divided by odds. strong conviction on a bad payout still gets you a small position f* is a fraction of the account, never a dollar amount. wins scale the next bet up, losses scale it down. you can shrink forever and never actually hit zero now the part that kills people a real, provable, positive edge will still bankrupt you if you size it wrong. the chart below is the same 400 trades run twice. same win rate. same edge. 10% sizing compounds to 110k. 30% sizing ends at 52 dollars it doesn't blow up because it was wrong. it blows up because it was right too big being right is the cheap part

0xbobaa

18,723 views • 2 months ago

🤯 BITCOIN IS SITTING ON A KNIFE EDGE AND THE MAP SHOWS WHICH WAY IT FALLS. Two walls of leverage surround price right now. $2 billion in shorts above at $67,000. $3 billion in longs below at $61,000. Price tends to run for the bigger pool. Right now that pool is underneath. The heavier liquidity is to the downside. That is the side to watch.

🤯 BITCOIN IS SITTING ON A KNIFE EDGE AND THE MAP SHOWS WHICH WAY IT FALLS. Two walls of leverage surround price right now. $2 billion in shorts above at $67,000. $3 billion in longs below at $61,000. Price tends to run for the bigger pool. Right now that pool is underneath. The heavier liquidity is to the downside. That is the side to watch.

Mister Crypto

15,870 views • 2 months ago

A QUANT SPENT YEARS AND A PHD BUILDING A STRATEGY THAT LOSES MORE THAN HALF ITS TRADES AND STILL PRINTS The secret is one line. w(t) = Rmax/(J·σ_risk) · (Σ sⱼ) · [1 + η·Σ 𝟙(c ≥ nₖ)] It sizes every bet by current risk, and that last bracket presses harder every time the signal confirms. In plain words. Keep the losers tiny, and pyramid hard into the winners. So it wins under half the time and still beats the market, because one winner erases ten small losses. That positive skew is the edge quants chase for years. Minara lets you build that exact behavior by describing it. 500+ factors, risk-scaled sizing, real backtests. The PhD math is real, the wall is gone. I took one plain sentence to a live, backtested strategy & posted every number in the article. Check it ↓

A QUANT SPENT YEARS AND A PHD BUILDING A STRATEGY THAT LOSES MORE THAN HALF ITS TRADES AND STILL PRINTS The secret is one line. w(t) = Rmax/(J·σ_risk) · (Σ sⱼ) · [1 + η·Σ 𝟙(c ≥ nₖ)] It sizes every bet by current risk, and that last bracket presses harder every time the signal confirms. In plain words. Keep the losers tiny, and pyramid hard into the winners. So it wins under half the time and still beats the market, because one winner erases ten small losses. That positive skew is the edge quants chase for years. Minara lets you build that exact behavior by describing it. 500+ factors, risk-scaled sizing, real backtests. The PhD math is real, the wall is gone. I took one plain sentence to a live, backtested strategy & posted every number in the article. Check it ↓

slash1s

53,465 views • 1 month ago

🚨Zlatan Ibrahimovic on Barcola + Mbaye to Liverpool for close to €200m: “Premier League inflated the market… now pay the price.” 🗣️“PSG asking close to 200 million for Barcola and Mbaye together is not crazy. It is the market you created. Elliot Anderson goes for 135 million. Morgan Rogers for almost 140. English clubs are throwing ridiculous money at players who have never won a Champions League, never carried a nation at a World Cup, never been the difference in the biggest games. Then they look at Barcola — two-time Champions League winner, France international, proven at the highest level — and suddenly 170 is ‘too much’? Please. Barcola is not some Premier League product hyped by Sky Sports. He is a real footballer who already has European titles. Mbaye is young, hungry, and has the kind of upside that clubs pay fortunes for later when it is too late. Together near 200 is high, yes. A bit high. But egregious? No. Not when the Premier League has completely inflated and ruined the transfer market with their own spending. I know value. I have been the most expensive player, the difference-maker, the one who made clubs rich by existing. PSG are not stupid. They built a machine that wins. They know what their players are worth in this market. If Liverpool want both, stop crying and pay. Or sit down like men and negotiate a serious number that respects the asking price. You cannot complain about the bill after you ordered the most expensive menu on the table for years. The Premier League spent like drunk tourists and now acts shocked when someone else asks for real money for real quality. That is not PSG being greedy. That is the market catching up to the mess English clubs made. If Liverpool want Barcola and Mbaye, they pay what the market demands or they leave them in Paris. Simple. Lions do not negotiate with feelings. They take what is theirs… or they pay the price.”

🚨Zlatan Ibrahimovic on Barcola + Mbaye to Liverpool for close to €200m: “Premier League inflated the market… now pay the price.” 🗣️“PSG asking close to 200 million for Barcola and Mbaye together is not crazy. It is the market you created. Elliot Anderson goes for 135 million. Morgan Rogers for almost 140. English clubs are throwing ridiculous money at players who have never won a Champions League, never carried a nation at a World Cup, never been the difference in the biggest games. Then they look at Barcola — two-time Champions League winner, France international, proven at the highest level — and suddenly 170 is ‘too much’? Please. Barcola is not some Premier League product hyped by Sky Sports. He is a real footballer who already has European titles. Mbaye is young, hungry, and has the kind of upside that clubs pay fortunes for later when it is too late. Together near 200 is high, yes. A bit high. But egregious? No. Not when the Premier League has completely inflated and ruined the transfer market with their own spending. I know value. I have been the most expensive player, the difference-maker, the one who made clubs rich by existing. PSG are not stupid. They built a machine that wins. They know what their players are worth in this market. If Liverpool want both, stop crying and pay. Or sit down like men and negotiate a serious number that respects the asking price. You cannot complain about the bill after you ordered the most expensive menu on the table for years. The Premier League spent like drunk tourists and now acts shocked when someone else asks for real money for real quality. That is not PSG being greedy. That is the market catching up to the mess English clubs made. If Liverpool want Barcola and Mbaye, they pay what the market demands or they leave them in Paris. Simple. Lions do not negotiate with feelings. They take what is theirs… or they pay the price.”

Vfynn_🥷🏼 𐙚

876,428 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: MICHAEL SAYLOR IS PANICKING > Avg buy price for Micro Strategy is $75,699 > Current price is $66,835 Here's what will happen, if the price don't go up this year: Phase 1: > $BTC no cash to pay dividends > has to sell Bitcoin Phase 2: > Selling Bitcoin -> the price goes down > $MSTR price goes down too > Can't raise new capital > No new BTC buys Phase 3: > Strategy has to sell > People panic and sell too > No or little new buys > Bitcoin goes to $18k > It's technically a bankruptcy The main question is: Will there be a new big player, who will buy Bitcoin as Michael Saylor does? If yes, then who and why? I will alert you when it's the right time to buy, if this moment happens.

🚨 BREAKING: MICHAEL SAYLOR IS PANICKING > Avg buy price for Micro Strategy is $75,699 > Current price is $66,835 Here's what will happen, if the price don't go up this year: Phase 1: > $BTC no cash to pay dividends > has to sell Bitcoin Phase 2: > Selling Bitcoin -> the price goes down > $MSTR price goes down too > Can't raise new capital > No new BTC buys Phase 3: > Strategy has to sell > People panic and sell too > No or little new buys > Bitcoin goes to $18k > It's technically a bankruptcy The main question is: Will there be a new big player, who will buy Bitcoin as Michael Saylor does? If yes, then who and why? I will alert you when it's the right time to buy, if this moment happens.

Hanzo ㊗️

285,705 views • 3 months ago

I want parents to really think about this. Imagine paying good money for lessons because you care about your daughter’s long-term development… and the first thing you’re told is that “swinging down isn’t correct.” Instead it’s barrel depth, elite path, and swinging up because “that’s what the pros do.” That’s where development goes backwards. Most young athletes aren’t broken they’re underdeveloped in movement. They don’t understand shoulder angles, how to get on top of the ball, situational hitting, or how the body actually organizes a swing. That’s not their fault. That’s instruction skipping steps. In my cage, athletes do not swing up first. They have to earn the right to swing up by first owning the down. We stay at the top of the zone, learn how to find the down, and teach how the shoulders orient the swing. The up isn’t cued or forced it’s a byproduct of correct movement. What floors me is how often kids, especially in softball, are taught to swing up immediately. How do you start middle-down and swing up in a sport where the ball is traveling on an upward plane? It makes no sense. Baseball and softball mechanics are the same the body doesn’t change. But instruction must start differently because pitch plane is different. Baseball breaks down. Softball rise spins up. If a softball hitter can’t control the down out front, they’ll never handle elite rise. Once control is there, the femur turns down, the torso gets pulled up, and the natural up shows itself. No forcing. No manipulation. I can post videos like this all day. I’m not teaching a “style.” I’m teaching how the body is designed to move. I’m demanding because parents invest real time and money, and I won’t waste either. If you want game swings that hold up to velocity and plane find the down!

I want parents to really think about this. Imagine paying good money for lessons because you care about your daughter’s long-term development… and the first thing you’re told is that “swinging down isn’t correct.” Instead it’s barrel depth, elite path, and swinging up because “that’s what the pros do.” That’s where development goes backwards. Most young athletes aren’t broken they’re underdeveloped in movement. They don’t understand shoulder angles, how to get on top of the ball, situational hitting, or how the body actually organizes a swing. That’s not their fault. That’s instruction skipping steps. In my cage, athletes do not swing up first. They have to earn the right to swing up by first owning the down. We stay at the top of the zone, learn how to find the down, and teach how the shoulders orient the swing. The up isn’t cued or forced it’s a byproduct of correct movement. What floors me is how often kids, especially in softball, are taught to swing up immediately. How do you start middle-down and swing up in a sport where the ball is traveling on an upward plane? It makes no sense. Baseball and softball mechanics are the same the body doesn’t change. But instruction must start differently because pitch plane is different. Baseball breaks down. Softball rise spins up. If a softball hitter can’t control the down out front, they’ll never handle elite rise. Once control is there, the femur turns down, the torso gets pulled up, and the natural up shows itself. No forcing. No manipulation. I can post videos like this all day. I’m not teaching a “style.” I’m teaching how the body is designed to move. I’m demanding because parents invest real time and money, and I won’t waste either. If you want game swings that hold up to velocity and plane find the down!

John Sangillo

47,117 views • 9 months ago