Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

A question I kept returning to was how soon robots will be ubiquitous in our daily lives. Sergey uses self-driving as an analogy, but explains why robotics may not follow the same path because the cost of mistakes is very different. Self-driving took over a decade and is still... show more

Patrick OShaughnessy

340,613 subscribers

57,780 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

New episode tomorrow on the path to fully autonomous robots with Sergey Levine One question I had for him: why won't robotics be like self driving cars? Google started their self driving project in 2009. And for over a decade and half, we’ve had the kinds of cool demos we sometimes now see for robotics, without any commercially viable and widely deployed machines. Sergey thinks we're in a different regime with robotics today, for 2 reasons: 1. Mistakes are way less costly (killing someone versus breaking a dish), so you can deploy much earlier and actually learn from those mistakes in deployement. 2. LLMs give robots a level of common sense which significantly boosts their generality. "You can say, 'Hey, there's a sign that says slippery floor. What's going to happen when I walk over that?' No autonomous car in 2009 would have been able to answer that question." Full episode out tomorrow!

New episode tomorrow on the path to fully autonomous robots with Sergey Levine One question I had for him: why won't robotics be like self driving cars? Google started their self driving project in 2009. And for over a decade and half, we’ve had the kinds of cool demos we sometimes now see for robotics, without any commercially viable and widely deployed machines. Sergey thinks we're in a different regime with robotics today, for 2 reasons: 1. Mistakes are way less costly (killing someone versus breaking a dish), so you can deploy much earlier and actually learn from those mistakes in deployement. 2. LLMs give robots a level of common sense which significantly boosts their generality. "You can say, 'Hey, there's a sign that says slippery floor. What's going to happen when I walk over that?' No autonomous car in 2009 would have been able to answer that question." Full episode out tomorrow!

Dwarkesh Patel

50,960 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

JUST IN:‼️ An Ex-Muslim breakout some secrets But It Looks like Muslims in Ghana are very different from other part of the world…….And I think they have a different upbringing. Because Ghanaian Muslims are very peaceful

JUST IN:‼️ An Ex-Muslim breakout some secrets But It Looks like Muslims in Ghana are very different from other part of the world…….And I think they have a different upbringing. Because Ghanaian Muslims are very peaceful

Yawa

37,963 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Senator Jeanne Shaheen on Syria: Are there going to be mistakes? Of course there will be mistakes. I just finished watching The American Revolution, which is a documentary in the United States about our fight for independence. There were all kinds of mistakes made in the early days of the United States. We continue to make mistakes. But the important thing about democracies — the important thing about stable societies — is that we are able to correct those mistakes, to provide accountability and justice when mistakes are made, and to move forward in a positive way. And that is what I think we want for Syria and for the entire Middle East region.

Senator Jeanne Shaheen on Syria: Are there going to be mistakes? Of course there will be mistakes. I just finished watching The American Revolution, which is a documentary in the United States about our fight for independence. There were all kinds of mistakes made in the early days of the United States. We continue to make mistakes. But the important thing about democracies — the important thing about stable societies — is that we are able to correct those mistakes, to provide accountability and justice when mistakes are made, and to move forward in a positive way. And that is what I think we want for Syria and for the entire Middle East region.

Clash Report

27,537 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Tesla just rolled its first production Cybercab off the line in Texas & some people think self driving cars are too risky because roads are unpredictable They’re not wrong about the unpredictability But unpredictability is a data problem. Let's dive into how this is fixed

Tesla just rolled its first production Cybercab off the line in Texas & some people think self driving cars are too risky because roads are unpredictable They’re not wrong about the unpredictability But unpredictability is a data problem. Let's dive into how this is fixed

ORO AI

15,563 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Came across this video of Late Sheikh Giro and one thing I learnt as with most scholars of his caliber is that when they come of age, they come to a realization that the method of harshness deployed in their early days of daawah is counter productive. As young people, it’s imperative to learn from the mistakes of scholars that have walked the path, made mistakes and later realized these mistakes. This will guide us in falling into same mistakes. May Allah accept all his good deeds And forgive his errors

Came across this video of Late Sheikh Giro and one thing I learnt as with most scholars of his caliber is that when they come of age, they come to a realization that the method of harshness deployed in their early days of daawah is counter productive. As young people, it’s imperative to learn from the mistakes of scholars that have walked the path, made mistakes and later realized these mistakes. This will guide us in falling into same mistakes. May Allah accept all his good deeds And forgive his errors

Uncle K Esq

110,158 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

If you’re not making many mistakes, you must not be learning much. Mistakes and failures are ultimately more valuable to you than successes because they provide the best learning. I detailed some of my biggest mistakes—and what I learned from them—as part of the new MasterClass Executive program. At this stage in my life, I believe the most important thing I can do is to pass along everything I’ve learned to others, hoping that they find value in it and can avoid making the same mistakes I’ve made. If you’re interested in the program, you can apply for one of the limited spots here:

If you’re not making many mistakes, you must not be learning much. Mistakes and failures are ultimately more valuable to you than successes because they provide the best learning. I detailed some of my biggest mistakes—and what I learned from them—as part of the new MasterClass Executive program. At this stage in my life, I believe the most important thing I can do is to pass along everything I’ve learned to others, hoping that they find value in it and can avoid making the same mistakes I’ve made. If you’re interested in the program, you can apply for one of the limited spots here:

Ray Dalio

122,301 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Brett: Figure will deploy robots to many different customers, we'll probably announce a lot of these over the next 90 days. Molly: Are you worried about Optimus? Brett: In my mind, this is not a manufacturing problem, this is an intelligence problem.

Brett: Figure will deploy robots to many different customers, we'll probably announce a lot of these over the next 90 days. Molly: Are you worried about Optimus? Brett: In my mind, this is not a manufacturing problem, this is an intelligence problem.

The Humanoid Hub

48,395 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

“If I have to see one more person say, ‘Oh my gosh, operating margins or net profit margins in the S&P 500 are so extraordinary because we’re having a productivity boom,’ I will lose my mind. We are not having a productivity boom. We are having an operating leverage boom. And that’s a very, very, very different thing, because one is sustainable and the other is cyclical.” Cameron Dawson on why record S&P 500 profit margins may be telling investors something very different than they think

“If I have to see one more person say, ‘Oh my gosh, operating margins or net profit margins in the S&P 500 are so extraordinary because we’re having a productivity boom,’ I will lose my mind. We are not having a productivity boom. We are having an operating leverage boom. And that’s a very, very, very different thing, because one is sustainable and the other is cyclical.” Cameron Dawson on why record S&P 500 profit margins may be telling investors something very different than they think

Excess Returns

345,491 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla's AI lead, during a GTC discussion, highlighting the fundamental similarity in AI approaches for self-driving cars and humanoid robots: - Hierarchical decision making is useful, but it has to be done as part of the same decision-making process as lower-level controls. - We haven't seen the long tail of humanoid robotics, but Tesla has seen the long tail of self-driving, where high and low-level decisions have to be jointly made at a pretty high framerate. - Optimus's architecture is designed in a similar way, where there's a hierarchy but it's all running as part of the same model and the latencies involved in decision making are well modeled. - This architecture will scale quite well with humanoid robots. - The distinction of the decision-making levels is only in the developer's mind. For the model, it's a continuous space of decision making, where there are dials available to make them more fine or coarse. - Humanoids have more sensor modalities and higher degrees of freedom compared to self-driving, but the fundamental constraints remain the same: you need to make real-time decisions. There's obviously a hierarchy to these control signal outputs, but the lowest frequency cannot be too low, because the safety of the robot cannot depend upon things running at very low frequencies.

Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla's AI lead, during a GTC discussion, highlighting the fundamental similarity in AI approaches for self-driving cars and humanoid robots: - Hierarchical decision making is useful, but it has to be done as part of the same decision-making process as lower-level controls. - We haven't seen the long tail of humanoid robotics, but Tesla has seen the long tail of self-driving, where high and low-level decisions have to be jointly made at a pretty high framerate. - Optimus's architecture is designed in a similar way, where there's a hierarchy but it's all running as part of the same model and the latencies involved in decision making are well modeled. - This architecture will scale quite well with humanoid robots. - The distinction of the decision-making levels is only in the developer's mind. For the model, it's a continuous space of decision making, where there are dials available to make them more fine or coarse. - Humanoids have more sensor modalities and higher degrees of freedom compared to self-driving, but the fundamental constraints remain the same: you need to make real-time decisions. There's obviously a hierarchy to these control signal outputs, but the lowest frequency cannot be too low, because the safety of the robot cannot depend upon things running at very low frequencies.

The Humanoid Hub

670,225 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"This is an emergency budget statement because of her own mistakes in October, not listening to people." Economist Liam Halligan says a lot of the reason why Rachel Reeves is in a fiscal hole, is a "pretty diabolical" inheritance from the Tories. Julia Hartley-Brewer | Liam Halligan

"This is an emergency budget statement because of her own mistakes in October, not listening to people." Economist Liam Halligan says a lot of the reason why Rachel Reeves is in a fiscal hole, is a "pretty diabolical" inheritance from the Tories. Julia Hartley-Brewer | Liam Halligan

Talk

26,134 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is not a 2050 warehouse. This is a modern air hub of Amazon. Amazon uses robots to help sort and ship billions of packages each year. At Amazon Air, the company's main air hub in Kentucky, hundreds of self-charging robots zoom across the warehouse floor to organize orders. These robots, called “drives,” follow small stickers on the floor to know where to go and when to speed up or slow down. Amazon has more than ONE MILLION robots in its facilities, and it’s even deploying more new types of robots that can sort items of different shapes and sizes. P.S. Can you guess how many robots they had back in 2013? ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

This is not a 2050 warehouse. This is a modern air hub of Amazon. Amazon uses robots to help sort and ship billions of packages each year. At Amazon Air, the company's main air hub in Kentucky, hundreds of self-charging robots zoom across the warehouse floor to organize orders. These robots, called “drives,” follow small stickers on the floor to know where to go and when to speed up or slow down. Amazon has more than ONE MILLION robots in its facilities, and it’s even deploying more new types of robots that can sort items of different shapes and sizes. P.S. Can you guess how many robots they had back in 2013? ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

178,090 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk says Tesla is building an “Optimus Academy” so the robots can perform different tasks in the real world. “We’re going to need to build a lot of robots, and put them into a Optimus Academy, so they can do self-play in reality. We’re actually building that out, we’re going to have at least 10-30K Optimus robots that are testing different tasks.”

Elon Musk says Tesla is building an “Optimus Academy” so the robots can perform different tasks in the real world. “We’re going to need to build a lot of robots, and put them into a Optimus Academy, so they can do self-play in reality. We’re actually building that out, we’re going to have at least 10-30K Optimus robots that are testing different tasks.”

Nic Cruz Patane

20,052 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Legacy automakers are in a very precarious position right now. They haven't yet figured out how to make compelling EVs profitably, so now many of them are starting to fall back on the gas products that do make them money, but this will put them even further behind in the future, which also means they will likely underinvest in self-driving capabilities and the best product for that (EVs). Ford is working on its "Universal EV Platform" designed to reduce costs, with the first vehicle with that aiming for a 2027 release, but it remains to be seen whether that plan will live up to its promise. I think we’re going to see a lot of consolidation across the legacy auto industry over the next few years. Many of these companies will struggle to catch up in self-driving because they spent years dragging their feet. At this point, self-driving is largely a software problem, and software is where most legacy automakers are weakest. Many still struggle with basic in-car UI and software updates, let alone building and iterating on full self-driving systems at scale (pretty much non-existent for them).

Legacy automakers are in a very precarious position right now. They haven't yet figured out how to make compelling EVs profitably, so now many of them are starting to fall back on the gas products that do make them money, but this will put them even further behind in the future, which also means they will likely underinvest in self-driving capabilities and the best product for that (EVs). Ford is working on its "Universal EV Platform" designed to reduce costs, with the first vehicle with that aiming for a 2027 release, but it remains to be seen whether that plan will live up to its promise. I think we’re going to see a lot of consolidation across the legacy auto industry over the next few years. Many of these companies will struggle to catch up in self-driving because they spent years dragging their feet. At this point, self-driving is largely a software problem, and software is where most legacy automakers are weakest. Many still struggle with basic in-car UI and software updates, let alone building and iterating on full self-driving systems at scale (pretty much non-existent for them).

Sawyer Merritt

201,685 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Bestselling historian, Yuval Noah Harari, explains why we may be one of the last generations of homo sapiens. The prediction: "We are one of the last generations of homo sapiens. Within a century or two, Earth will be dominated by entities that are more different from us than we are different from chimpanzees." The technologies driving the shift: Harari explains that we as humans will soon have the power to re-engineer our bodies and brains through genetic engineering, direct brain-to-computer connections, and completely non-organic artificial intelligence. These technologies are developing at breakneck speed. The unprecedented danger: Harari warns, "One of the dangers is that we will see in the coming decades, a process of greater inequality than in any previous time in history because for the first time it will be real biological inequality." If enhancement technologies are available only to the rich or only to people from certain countries: "Homo sapiens will split into different biological castes because they really have different bodies and different abilities." Why this matters: Throughout history, inequality has been social and economic, but humans remained biologically equal. We're now approaching a threshold where the enhanced and unenhanced could be as different as humans and chimpanzees. The question is... who gets access, and what happens when biological inequality becomes real?

Bestselling historian, Yuval Noah Harari, explains why we may be one of the last generations of homo sapiens. The prediction: "We are one of the last generations of homo sapiens. Within a century or two, Earth will be dominated by entities that are more different from us than we are different from chimpanzees." The technologies driving the shift: Harari explains that we as humans will soon have the power to re-engineer our bodies and brains through genetic engineering, direct brain-to-computer connections, and completely non-organic artificial intelligence. These technologies are developing at breakneck speed. The unprecedented danger: Harari warns, "One of the dangers is that we will see in the coming decades, a process of greater inequality than in any previous time in history because for the first time it will be real biological inequality." If enhancement technologies are available only to the rich or only to people from certain countries: "Homo sapiens will split into different biological castes because they really have different bodies and different abilities." Why this matters: Throughout history, inequality has been social and economic, but humans remained biologically equal. We're now approaching a threshold where the enhanced and unenhanced could be as different as humans and chimpanzees. The question is... who gets access, and what happens when biological inequality becomes real?

Emmett Voss

246,376 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

ELON: SELF-DRIVING IS A SOLVED PROBLEM “I think self-driving cars are essentially a solved problem at this point. Tesla has rolled out a robotaxi service in a few cities, and it will be very, very widespread by the end of this year within the U.S.” Source: CNBC

ELON: SELF-DRIVING IS A SOLVED PROBLEM “I think self-driving cars are essentially a solved problem at this point. Tesla has rolled out a robotaxi service in a few cities, and it will be very, very widespread by the end of this year within the U.S.” Source: CNBC

Mario Nawfal

28,757 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Joe Lacob on the Warriors drafting Jonathan Kuminga: "I do not view Jonathan Kuminga as a mistake. I think we may have made some mistakes in how would we handle it and how he handled it, maybe he made some mistakes, and obviously that's well documented and we had to move on, but he's an NBA player and played in the playoffs, and did really well. This not a mistake at the 7th pick. There were 7th picks that are out of the League."

Joe Lacob on the Warriors drafting Jonathan Kuminga: "I do not view Jonathan Kuminga as a mistake. I think we may have made some mistakes in how would we handle it and how he handled it, maybe he made some mistakes, and obviously that's well documented and we had to move on, but he's an NBA player and played in the playoffs, and did really well. This not a mistake at the 7th pick. There were 7th picks that are out of the League."

Chef

95,276 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

As I have stated before, SAF is a filthy organization that keeps repeating the same mistakes over and over again. I called out your botched operation in the UAE back in May 2025, and here we are again, same playbook, same exposure, same embarrassment. You can keep scrambling in the shadows, but every move just confirms the same reality: you’re not strategic, you’re predictable.

As I have stated before, SAF is a filthy organization that keeps repeating the same mistakes over and over again. I called out your botched operation in the UAE back in May 2025, and here we are again, same playbook, same exposure, same embarrassment. You can keep scrambling in the shadows, but every move just confirms the same reality: you’re not strategic, you’re predictable.

Rauda Altenaiji

19,534 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten