Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

A quick explainer of the immunity given in Trump’s recent glyphosate EO. The people saying it gives immunity for product liability are either lying or retarded.

Jon Herold

105,835 subscribers

16,180 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

One of the largest pesticide manufacturers in the WORLD has spent millions lobbying for passage of a pesticide liability shield & legal immunity from the impacts of glyphosate. It must be defeated.

One of the largest pesticide manufacturers in the WORLD has spent millions lobbying for passage of a pesticide liability shield & legal immunity from the impacts of glyphosate. It must be defeated.

Rep. Joe Neguse

31,528 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

BREAKING: 70% of Americans OPPOSE Trump’s pesticide liability shield. This would be a severe betrayal of MAHA. Republicans are on the verge of handing Bayer-Monsanto total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate in the 2026 Farm Bill. And Trump supports it. Not only that, but Trump’s DOJ is also pushing for the Supreme Court to hand pesticide companies a liability shield in a case later this month, regardless of whether Congress passes it in the Farm Bill. Americans overwhelmingly oppose this. MAHA voted to remove the liability shield for vaccines, not to expand it to yet another poison industry. Leslie Manookian Jeffrey A Tucker Brownstone Institute

BREAKING: 70% of Americans OPPOSE Trump’s pesticide liability shield. This would be a severe betrayal of MAHA. Republicans are on the verge of handing Bayer-Monsanto total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate in the 2026 Farm Bill. And Trump supports it. Not only that, but Trump’s DOJ is also pushing for the Supreme Court to hand pesticide companies a liability shield in a case later this month, regardless of whether Congress passes it in the Farm Bill. Americans overwhelmingly oppose this. MAHA voted to remove the liability shield for vaccines, not to expand it to yet another poison industry. Leslie Manookian Jeffrey A Tucker Brownstone Institute

Health Freedom Defense Fund

36,844 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 A Supreme Court Case Could Make It Nearly Impossible for Cancer Victims to Sue Glyphosate Manufacturers If Bayer wins its glyphosate case, the EPA—not state courts—could become the final authority on whether pesticide labels are “adequate.” That would eliminate state failure-to-warn lawsuits, effectively granting immunity to manufacturers of glyphosate products like Roundup. In plain terms: even if someone develops cancer allegedly linked to glyphosate, families may no longer be able to sue for accountability or to cover medical costs. For decades, state courts have allowed juries to hear evidence and decide whether companies failed to warn consumers about risks. This case could shift that power from states to federal regulatory decisions. The stakes are enormous—for cancer patients, consumer protection laws, and public health. When corporations making billions from a product gain legal immunity, who protects the people harmed? Pay attention to this case. Your rights—and the future of product liability—could depend on it.

🚨 A Supreme Court Case Could Make It Nearly Impossible for Cancer Victims to Sue Glyphosate Manufacturers If Bayer wins its glyphosate case, the EPA—not state courts—could become the final authority on whether pesticide labels are “adequate.” That would eliminate state failure-to-warn lawsuits, effectively granting immunity to manufacturers of glyphosate products like Roundup. In plain terms: even if someone develops cancer allegedly linked to glyphosate, families may no longer be able to sue for accountability or to cover medical costs. For decades, state courts have allowed juries to hear evidence and decide whether companies failed to warn consumers about risks. This case could shift that power from states to federal regulatory decisions. The stakes are enormous—for cancer patients, consumer protection laws, and public health. When corporations making billions from a product gain legal immunity, who protects the people harmed? Pay attention to this case. Your rights—and the future of product liability—could depend on it.

Tom Renz

14,472 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Thomas Massie just delivered an urgent call to action: “Americans are under attack by a German company.” Bayer-Monsanto. “People this week should be calling their congressmen … and saying, take the glyphosate immunity out of the Farm Bill.” “It’s poison.” “This administration has sided with the German company trying to get immunity from the harm that their products may cause.” “Chellie Pingree and I … are trying to get them to strip the immunity for glyphosate that they’ve put into the Farm Bill.” “Bayer’s product has become unprofitable because of the harm that state juries have decided has been caused to people.” “And there’s something broader though than just glyphosate here.” “This would set a precedent for every pesticide, every herbicide, every insecticide.” “It would set a precedent that the EPA doesn’t exist to protect people and the environment.” “It exists to give get-out-of-court-free cards to corporations.” Thomas Massie for Congress Thomas Massie LindellTV

Thomas Massie just delivered an urgent call to action: “Americans are under attack by a German company.” Bayer-Monsanto. “People this week should be calling their congressmen … and saying, take the glyphosate immunity out of the Farm Bill.” “It’s poison.” “This administration has sided with the German company trying to get immunity from the harm that their products may cause.” “Chellie Pingree and I … are trying to get them to strip the immunity for glyphosate that they’ve put into the Farm Bill.” “Bayer’s product has become unprofitable because of the harm that state juries have decided has been caused to people.” “And there’s something broader though than just glyphosate here.” “This would set a precedent for every pesticide, every herbicide, every insecticide.” “It would set a precedent that the EPA doesn’t exist to protect people and the environment.” “It exists to give get-out-of-court-free cards to corporations.” Thomas Massie for Congress Thomas Massie LindellTV

Holden Culotta

442,794 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

RFK Jr. just told Joe Rogan it would be a huge mistake for the Supreme Court to give pesticide companies liability protection from harm. “There’s a lawsuit before the Supreme Court… that asked for federal preemption.” “That would mean that if the federal label says that this is safe, these state lawsuits cannot be brought.” “It would throw out a lot of the state lawsuits and effectively gives them immunity from liability, which to me it’s not good to give any company immunity from liability.” “It takes away all incentive for them to make the product safer.” Secretary Kennedy Joe Rogan

RFK Jr. just told Joe Rogan it would be a huge mistake for the Supreme Court to give pesticide companies liability protection from harm. “There’s a lawsuit before the Supreme Court… that asked for federal preemption.” “That would mean that if the federal label says that this is safe, these state lawsuits cannot be brought.” “It would throw out a lot of the state lawsuits and effectively gives them immunity from liability, which to me it’s not good to give any company immunity from liability.” “It takes away all incentive for them to make the product safer.” Secretary Kennedy Joe Rogan

Children’s Health Defense

14,091 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

💊 Introducing Immunity™: The Legal Drug That Erases Consequences 💊 Now available in a variety of powerful formulations: 👉 Qualified Immunity 👉 Absolute Immunity 👉 Municipal Immunity 👉 Prosecutorial Immunity 👉 Judicial Immunity Take your pick — there’s a dose for every level of power. Immunity™: It stops accountability dead.

💊 Introducing Immunity™: The Legal Drug That Erases Consequences 💊 Now available in a variety of powerful formulations: 👉 Qualified Immunity 👉 Absolute Immunity 👉 Municipal Immunity 👉 Prosecutorial Immunity 👉 Judicial Immunity Take your pick — there’s a dose for every level of power. Immunity™: It stops accountability dead.

Institute for Justice

116,102 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Shawn Ryan says Trump betrayed the MAHA movement by backing immunity for pesticide companies. “Did you see the glyphosate stuff?” “Immunity.” “Because of what? A national security issue?” “Do you know how many people died of cancer last year? 618,000.” “That’s somehow not a national security concern.” “You know where the highest concentration of glyphosate is? It’s in Iowa.” “Do you know where the highest concentration of cancer is? It’s in Iowa.” “And he just gave them (pesticide companies) immunity.” Joe Kent Shawn Ryan

Shawn Ryan says Trump betrayed the MAHA movement by backing immunity for pesticide companies. “Did you see the glyphosate stuff?” “Immunity.” “Because of what? A national security issue?” “Do you know how many people died of cancer last year? 618,000.” “That’s somehow not a national security concern.” “You know where the highest concentration of glyphosate is? It’s in Iowa.” “Do you know where the highest concentration of cancer is? It’s in Iowa.” “And he just gave them (pesticide companies) immunity.” Joe Kent Shawn Ryan

End Tribalism in Politics

590,232 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Tens of thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Bayer for failing to warn people about the risks of glyphosate exposure. Now, EPA Administrator Zeldin and Trump are pushing for legal immunity to protect Bayer from being sued by Americans getting cancer from their product.

Tens of thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Bayer for failing to warn people about the risks of glyphosate exposure. Now, EPA Administrator Zeldin and Trump are pushing for legal immunity to protect Bayer from being sued by Americans getting cancer from their product.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

71,233 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The federal government is planning liability immunity for Bayer/Monsanto over glyphosate. Farmers and families deserve equal protection under the law — not special treatment for billion-dollar corporations. If someone is harmed, they deserve their day in court. No more cronyism. No corporate immunity. I’m not the establishment’s, Big Corporation’s, or Big Pharma’s candidate — and that’s why I can speak out against this asinine move.

The federal government is planning liability immunity for Bayer/Monsanto over glyphosate. Farmers and families deserve equal protection under the law — not special treatment for billion-dollar corporations. If someone is harmed, they deserve their day in court. No more cronyism. No corporate immunity. I’m not the establishment’s, Big Corporation’s, or Big Pharma’s candidate — and that’s why I can speak out against this asinine move.

Don Brown

21,958 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Thomas Massie: “They’re trying to get immunity for data centers, for pesticides.” “They’re trying to get all kinds of immunity and prevent jury trials.” “This is something that’s not even on people’s radar.” “We got it struck from the Farm Bill.” “They were trying to put immunity for glyphosate in there.” Thomas Massie Jimmy Dore

Thomas Massie: “They’re trying to get immunity for data centers, for pesticides.” “They’re trying to get all kinds of immunity and prevent jury trials.” “This is something that’s not even on people’s radar.” “We got it struck from the Farm Bill.” “They were trying to put immunity for glyphosate in there.” Thomas Massie Jimmy Dore

Children’s Health Defense

116,988 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Lawyer Aaron Siri is asking questions at the ACIP hearing that millions of parents have been asking for years about Big Pharma’s vaccine-injury liability shield. “Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe?” “Why does a product need immunity if it doesn’t cause harm?” “And why do products that have been on the market for decades, like the Hepatitis B vaccine, still need that immunity?” “Do we still not know if they’re safe enough to lift the immunity on those products?”

Lawyer Aaron Siri is asking questions at the ACIP hearing that millions of parents have been asking for years about Big Pharma’s vaccine-injury liability shield. “Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe?” “Why does a product need immunity if it doesn’t cause harm?” “And why do products that have been on the market for decades, like the Hepatitis B vaccine, still need that immunity?” “Do we still not know if they’re safe enough to lift the immunity on those products?”

MAHA Action

16,962 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

“We are going to get them immunity and protection”: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna says she has spoken to the White House about giving a list of people immunity from security clearance violations or the Espionage Act for disclosing information regarding UAP. More:

“We are going to get them immunity and protection”: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna says she has spoken to the White House about giving a list of people immunity from security clearance violations or the Espionage Act for disclosing information regarding UAP. More:

NewsNation

18,786 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe and effective? Why does a product need immunity if it doesn't cause harm? Why do products that have been on the market for decades, like the hepatitis B vaccine, still need immunity?

Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe and effective? Why does a product need immunity if it doesn't cause harm? Why do products that have been on the market for decades, like the hepatitis B vaccine, still need immunity?

Aaron Siri

213,212 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🇺🇸 Donald Trump’s immunity has been lifted... The U.S. Supreme Court ruled to lift Trump’s immunity in connection with the Epstein case. The way has been cleared for his prosecution, and he could be removed from office.

🇺🇸 Donald Trump’s immunity has been lifted... The U.S. Supreme Court ruled to lift Trump’s immunity in connection with the Epstein case. The way has been cleared for his prosecution, and he could be removed from office.

GBC

471,003 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

“This is actually devastating.” Jillian Michaels is in disbelief at how bad the recent Trump executive order on glyphosate is. “It is not a conspiracy theory that glyphosate is linked to cancer.” “There are hundreds of studies.” “It increases risk significantly for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.” “We also know through whistleblowers and numerous lawsuits… that the chemical company knew this and tried to bury the information, tried to go after the independent researchers, created ghost studies to try to tell a different story.” “They now have to pay $7.25 billion, the makers of glyphosate, to the victims.” “The day after, the president essentially gives blanket immunity to the chemical companies for glyphosate going forward.” Jillian Michaels

“This is actually devastating.” Jillian Michaels is in disbelief at how bad the recent Trump executive order on glyphosate is. “It is not a conspiracy theory that glyphosate is linked to cancer.” “There are hundreds of studies.” “It increases risk significantly for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.” “We also know through whistleblowers and numerous lawsuits… that the chemical company knew this and tried to bury the information, tried to go after the independent researchers, created ghost studies to try to tell a different story.” “They now have to pay $7.25 billion, the makers of glyphosate, to the victims.” “The day after, the president essentially gives blanket immunity to the chemical companies for glyphosate going forward.” Jillian Michaels

Children’s Health Defense

37,761 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Pesticide manufacturers, corporations, are being granted immunity for causing cancer to farmers The is a very controversial provision provision in the 2026 House Farm Bill (Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026) It would make the EPA’s federal pesticide label the sole authority on safety warnings It then prohibits states, localities, or courts from requiring additional warnings on labels or holding manufacturers liable for “failure to warn” if the product follows the EPA-approved label This cleverly creates a federal liability shield for pesticide companies likeBayer against lawsuits claiming inadequate warnings about health risks One of the big ones is cancers like non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma It does not grant blanket immunity to farmers or users, instead it protects the manufacturers of pesticides from lawsuits

Pesticide manufacturers, corporations, are being granted immunity for causing cancer to farmers The is a very controversial provision provision in the 2026 House Farm Bill (Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026) It would make the EPA’s federal pesticide label the sole authority on safety warnings It then prohibits states, localities, or courts from requiring additional warnings on labels or holding manufacturers liable for “failure to warn” if the product follows the EPA-approved label This cleverly creates a federal liability shield for pesticide companies likeBayer against lawsuits claiming inadequate warnings about health risks One of the big ones is cancers like non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma It does not grant blanket immunity to farmers or users, instead it protects the manufacturers of pesticides from lawsuits

Wall Street Apes

15,554 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The glyphosate immunity bill was a line in the sand for me. Call it what it is: effective immunity for cancer-causing manufacturers. When you see language about “protecting corporate viability,” what it really means is protecting corporations from being sued—even as families deal with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and other cancers linked to glyphosate exposure. That’s not justice. That’s corporate cronyism. I don’t care who’s in the White House—protecting corporations over kids is wrong. You can support a president and still call out corruption. You can reject policies that shield powerful interests from accountability. This isn’t partisan. It’s about whether families get justice—or corporations get immunity.

The glyphosate immunity bill was a line in the sand for me. Call it what it is: effective immunity for cancer-causing manufacturers. When you see language about “protecting corporate viability,” what it really means is protecting corporations from being sued—even as families deal with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and other cancers linked to glyphosate exposure. That’s not justice. That’s corporate cronyism. I don’t care who’s in the White House—protecting corporations over kids is wrong. You can support a president and still call out corruption. You can reject policies that shield powerful interests from accountability. This isn’t partisan. It’s about whether families get justice—or corporations get immunity.

Tom Renz

21,238 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This season we learnt there are so many uses to an idol, not only has it given me implicit immunity for over a month, but I also managed to give my best friend implicit immunity in a top 5, now that’s how you make the most of an idol 😉 #SurvivorAu

This season we learnt there are so many uses to an idol, not only has it given me implicit immunity for over a month, but I also managed to give my best friend implicit immunity in a top 5, now that’s how you make the most of an idol 😉 #SurvivorAu

Feras basal

21,360 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"A vaccine is a product that causes so much harm, that it cannot survive on the market without having immunity for liability for its injuries." --Aaron Siri "What the public hears about vaccines is like a religion. It's based on dogma...it's not based on the evidence."

"A vaccine is a product that causes so much harm, that it cannot survive on the market without having immunity for liability for its injuries." --Aaron Siri "What the public hears about vaccines is like a religion. It's based on dogma...it's not based on the evidence."

Valerie Anne Smith

25,186 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I appreciate the “speech and debate” clause gives immunity for things government officials say. But someone should test the limits of that immunity… Maliciously and fraudulently exploiting that immunity to spout objective demonstratable lies should not be included. Fraud vitiates everything. Ted Lieu should be censured at the very least. Or sued into oblivion. Preferably both.

I appreciate the “speech and debate” clause gives immunity for things government officials say. But someone should test the limits of that immunity… Maliciously and fraudulently exploiting that immunity to spout objective demonstratable lies should not be included. Fraud vitiates everything. Ted Lieu should be censured at the very least. Or sued into oblivion. Preferably both.

Viva Frei

95,463 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten