正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

A recent post circulating from Andrew Huberman claims that low reps don’t build muscle and that high reps are necessary for muscle growth. However, this doesn’t align with the data I’ve studied. At the core of muscle building is the principle of overload and pushing your muscles close to... failure. It’s often said you should leave about one rep “in the tank” — though this can be tricky to gauge. In my training routine, I start with warm-ups, then perform 1-2 intense sets before moving on. Each muscle group is worked 2-3 times per week. Now, consider this: can doing 12-20 half-hearted reps truly build more muscle than a few well-executed, heavy sets? The answer is clear—quality and intensity triumph over mere quantity. Support this page by shopping at Tiger Fitness !show more

Marc Lobliner - IFBB Pro

108,028 subscribers

101,450 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

You can only grow through the training that you can recover from.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ High reps add undue levels of fatigue, thereby impairing recovery, while offering no additional benefit.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ Because anything outside the last 4-5 reps from failure does not stimulate growth, and is therefore superfluous.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ An optimised hypertrophy programme has to factor in fatigue, and it has to attempt to minimise it.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ That's why I recommend 4-6 reps.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ It's more efficient, it maximises the stimulus to fatigue ratio, and that can be a gamechanger for people who have been stalling their progress due to impaired recovery.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ This is a very easy theory to test out for yourself.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ - 4-6 reps.⠀⠀⠀ - Straight sets.⠀⠀⠀ - Train close to failure.⠀⠀⠀ - Rest 3 minutes between sets.⠀⠀⠀ - Train each muscle twice per week.⠀⠀⠀ - Do 2-4 sets per muscle group per session. - Add weight whenever possible.⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ Your progress will be the proof.

You can only grow through the training that you can recover from.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ High reps add undue levels of fatigue, thereby impairing recovery, while offering no additional benefit.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ Because anything outside the last 4-5 reps from failure does not stimulate growth, and is therefore superfluous.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ An optimised hypertrophy programme has to factor in fatigue, and it has to attempt to minimise it.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ That's why I recommend 4-6 reps.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ It's more efficient, it maximises the stimulus to fatigue ratio, and that can be a gamechanger for people who have been stalling their progress due to impaired recovery.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ This is a very easy theory to test out for yourself.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ - 4-6 reps.⠀⠀⠀ - Straight sets.⠀⠀⠀ - Train close to failure.⠀⠀⠀ - Rest 3 minutes between sets.⠀⠀⠀ - Train each muscle twice per week.⠀⠀⠀ - Do 2-4 sets per muscle group per session. - Add weight whenever possible.⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ Your progress will be the proof.

Sama Hoole

14,474 次观看 • 6 个月前

Training a muscle 2-3 times a week in the 4-6 rep range is simply the most effective way to make it grow. - You're minimising fatigue (caused by volume) - Which allows you to maximise the growth stimulus (the last 5 reps from failure) - And recover fast enough to train the muscle in a fresh state in the same week (adding to the growth stimulus) Can you build muscle while ignoring this and just going for the pump? Sure, but it pays to have the right programming if you're not settling for mediocrity.

Training a muscle 2-3 times a week in the 4-6 rep range is simply the most effective way to make it grow. - You're minimising fatigue (caused by volume) - Which allows you to maximise the growth stimulus (the last 5 reps from failure) - And recover fast enough to train the muscle in a fresh state in the same week (adding to the growth stimulus) Can you build muscle while ignoring this and just going for the pump? Sure, but it pays to have the right programming if you're not settling for mediocrity.

Sama Hoole

23,982 次观看 • 6 个月前

Every man lives two lives.⠀ ⠀ The second begins when he realises that 2 sets of 6 reps builds more muscle than 4 sets of 12, while taking half the time and causing a quarter of the fatigue.⠀ ⠀ Because the only thing that causes growth is getting quality reps in close proximity to failure.⠀ ⠀ Heavy loads are the easier vehicle for achieving that.⠀ ⠀ There's less afferent feedback like lactic acid that could stop you before reaching true failure.⠀ ⠀ There's more focus and quality control because your sets are taking 20 seconds rather than 40-60.⠀ ⠀ There's more strength gains, because the loads are heavy enough to test your ability to move a weight explosively.⠀ ⠀ And there's less fatigue, so you're maintaining the growth stimulus across the exercise and session.⠀ ⠀ It's an easy choice to make, as long as you:⠀ ⠀ - Know that there is only one driver of hypertrophy⠀ - Understand that more isn't better⠀ - Accept that better is better

Every man lives two lives.⠀ ⠀ The second begins when he realises that 2 sets of 6 reps builds more muscle than 4 sets of 12, while taking half the time and causing a quarter of the fatigue.⠀ ⠀ Because the only thing that causes growth is getting quality reps in close proximity to failure.⠀ ⠀ Heavy loads are the easier vehicle for achieving that.⠀ ⠀ There's less afferent feedback like lactic acid that could stop you before reaching true failure.⠀ ⠀ There's more focus and quality control because your sets are taking 20 seconds rather than 40-60.⠀ ⠀ There's more strength gains, because the loads are heavy enough to test your ability to move a weight explosively.⠀ ⠀ And there's less fatigue, so you're maintaining the growth stimulus across the exercise and session.⠀ ⠀ It's an easy choice to make, as long as you:⠀ ⠀ - Know that there is only one driver of hypertrophy⠀ - Understand that more isn't better⠀ - Accept that better is better

Sama Hoole

449,569 次观看 • 7 个月前

Been training 4-6 rep range for years on zero carbs. Progressive overload still works. Strength still increases. Muscle still grows. The "carbs fuel workouts" narrative assumes you're doing 12-rep sets to failure with drop sets and supersets. That's not hypertrophy training. That's cardiovascular suffering with weights. Heavy weight, 4-6 reps, sufficient rest between sets: This is almost entirely ATP-PCr system (creatine phosphate), not glycolysis. Your creatine stores are full from eating meat. You have all the fuel needed. Carbs matter for high reps. They're irrelevant when you train properly.

Been training 4-6 rep range for years on zero carbs. Progressive overload still works. Strength still increases. Muscle still grows. The "carbs fuel workouts" narrative assumes you're doing 12-rep sets to failure with drop sets and supersets. That's not hypertrophy training. That's cardiovascular suffering with weights. Heavy weight, 4-6 reps, sufficient rest between sets: This is almost entirely ATP-PCr system (creatine phosphate), not glycolysis. Your creatine stores are full from eating meat. You have all the fuel needed. Carbs matter for high reps. They're irrelevant when you train properly.

Sama Hoole

34,774 次观看 • 6 个月前

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no direct effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. Both ranges can build muscle. The mechanism doesn't care about the rep count. It cares about how close you get to true failure on the reps where the high-threshold motor units are recruited and every available fibre is firing. Those are the stimulating reps. Everything else is filler. The catch with 10-12 is twofold. First, only the last 4-5 reps in a 12-rep set are actually stimulating. The first seven are buffer. They generate fatigue, lactic acid, and joint wear that the muscle has to push through before any growth signal arrives. Effort, yes. Stimulus, no. Second, and this is where the high-rep crowd quietly come undone: the long set produces so much afferent feedback (burning, gasping, the legs giving a small philosophical speech) that almost nobody actually takes the set to true failure. They stop two, three, sometimes four reps short, mistake the discomfort for the limit, and call it a hard set. The stimulating reps they were chasing never showed up. A set of 6 doesn't allow that confusion. Failure is mechanical. The weight either moves or it doesn't. No interpretive dance required. You'll grow on 10-12. You'll grow more on 4-6, with less joint wear, less recovery debt, and considerably less guesswork. One range tolerates your mistakes. The other doesn't have room for them.

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no direct effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. Both ranges can build muscle. The mechanism doesn't care about the rep count. It cares about how close you get to true failure on the reps where the high-threshold motor units are recruited and every available fibre is firing. Those are the stimulating reps. Everything else is filler. The catch with 10-12 is twofold. First, only the last 4-5 reps in a 12-rep set are actually stimulating. The first seven are buffer. They generate fatigue, lactic acid, and joint wear that the muscle has to push through before any growth signal arrives. Effort, yes. Stimulus, no. Second, and this is where the high-rep crowd quietly come undone: the long set produces so much afferent feedback (burning, gasping, the legs giving a small philosophical speech) that almost nobody actually takes the set to true failure. They stop two, three, sometimes four reps short, mistake the discomfort for the limit, and call it a hard set. The stimulating reps they were chasing never showed up. A set of 6 doesn't allow that confusion. Failure is mechanical. The weight either moves or it doesn't. No interpretive dance required. You'll grow on 10-12. You'll grow more on 4-6, with less joint wear, less recovery debt, and considerably less guesswork. One range tolerates your mistakes. The other doesn't have room for them.

Sama Hoole

62,986 次观看 • 2 个月前

Soreness is the ultimate indicator of growth. If you're not hobbling around for 3 days after leg day, you didn't train hard enough. This is why you should do 8 sets of walking lunges, 6 sets of leg extensions, 5 sets of leg press, and finish with 100 bodyweight squats. The crippling DOMS that prevents you from training legs again for a week is proof of optimal stimulus. Never mind that muscle damage is an inhibitor of growth, not a driver. Never mind that you can build muscle without soreness by training frequently enough that your body adapts. Never mind that the lads who are never sore are training more frequently and growing faster. You can barely walk. That's the real metric.

Soreness is the ultimate indicator of growth. If you're not hobbling around for 3 days after leg day, you didn't train hard enough. This is why you should do 8 sets of walking lunges, 6 sets of leg extensions, 5 sets of leg press, and finish with 100 bodyweight squats. The crippling DOMS that prevents you from training legs again for a week is proof of optimal stimulus. Never mind that muscle damage is an inhibitor of growth, not a driver. Never mind that you can build muscle without soreness by training frequently enough that your body adapts. Never mind that the lads who are never sore are training more frequently and growing faster. You can barely walk. That's the real metric.

Sama Hoole

49,388 次观看 • 7 个月前

$There is not a muscle on the body that needs high reps to see its best growth. This is basic physiology. Yes, muscles vary in their ratio of slow to fast twitch fibres. It doesn't matter, for two reasons: 1. Slow twitch fibres reach their ceiling early. They are not the limiting factor. 2. As you approach failure, every fibre is recruited regardless. The body does not leave capacity sitting idle when it thinks it's about to fail. Here is what actually drives hypertrophy: involuntary slow contractions. The point in a set where the concentric is grinding, the bar speed is dropping, and the muscle is being forced to recruit everything it has just to complete the rep. That is mechanical tension. That is the growth signal. It only exists in the final five or so reps before failure. Everything before that is your body coasting on the fibres it was already using. Some muscles tolerate high reps better than others. Calves are the classic example. But tolerating junk reps is not the same as benefiting from them. It just means the damage is less visible. The reps are still junk. If you are living in the 8-plus rep range, most of your set is happening nowhere near that zone of involuntary contraction. You are accumulating fatigue, impairing recovery, reducing training frequency, and spending more time under the bar: in exchange for a growth stimulus you could have captured in a fraction of the reps. More reps past the point of failure proximity is not more stimulus. It is just more cost.$

There is not a muscle on the body that needs high reps to see its best growth. This is basic physiology. Yes, muscles vary in their ratio of slow to fast twitch fibres. It doesn't matter, for two reasons: 1. Slow twitch fibres reach their ceiling early. They are not the limiting factor. 2. As you approach failure, every fibre is recruited regardless. The body does not leave capacity sitting idle when it thinks it's about to fail. Here is what actually drives hypertrophy: involuntary slow contractions. The point in a set where the concentric is grinding, the bar speed is dropping, and the muscle is being forced to recruit everything it has just to complete the rep. That is mechanical tension. That is the growth signal. It only exists in the final five or so reps before failure. Everything before that is your body coasting on the fibres it was already using. Some muscles tolerate high reps better than others. Calves are the classic example. But tolerating junk reps is not the same as benefiting from them. It just means the damage is less visible. The reps are still junk. If you are living in the 8-plus rep range, most of your set is happening nowhere near that zone of involuntary contraction. You are accumulating fatigue, impairing recovery, reducing training frequency, and spending more time under the bar: in exchange for a growth stimulus you could have captured in a fraction of the reps. More reps past the point of failure proximity is not more stimulus. It is just more cost.

Sama Hoole

15,967 次观看 • 3 个月前

If you have lagging Arms and bringing them up to par is your TOP PRIORITY… I’d recommend doing something like this each week: Upper A • 2-3 sets of “The GREATEST Triceps exercise known to man” • 2-3 sets of Supinated Grip Curls w/ Upper Arm Support • 2-3 sets of Machine or Cable Overhead Extensions • 2-3 sets of Hammer Grip Curls w/ Upper Arm Support Upper B (Performed 3-4 days after Upper A) • 2-3 sets of Dip Machine • 2-3 sets of Machine or Cable Preacher Curls • 2-3 sets of “The GREATEST Triceps exercise known to man” OR Machine or Cable Overhead Extensions • 2-3 sets of Hammer Grip Curls w/ Upper Arm Support This will result in you doing somewhere between 8-12 sets of direct Bicep and Tricep work per week Low likelihood you need any more volume than that to improve your Arms mightily if following the notes below: 1) The ideal rep range to be using when performing the exercises mentioned is the 5ish to 10ish rep range — Choose a weight you can do for 5, 6, 7 reps @ 0-2 RIR…once you can do that weight for 8, 9, 10ish reps, increase the load by 5ish pounds 2) You should perform all reps of all the listed exercises with a controlled (but not overly slow) eccentric and an explosive (but still controlled) concentric 3) You should perform these exercises very early in your workout to ensure they are as efficient/effective as possible — If you perform them later on, you will not get as robust a growth stimulus from the sets because of the outstanding fatigue that will be present from the earlier sets/exercises in your workout Additional notes: - You may sub any of these exercises for comparable exercises due to preferences and/or equipment availability — Ex: Dip Machine subbed for Weighted Dips - I probably forgot something that I should’ve mentioned…if I think of it I’ll drop it in the post below

If you have lagging Arms and bringing them up to par is your TOP PRIORITY… I’d recommend doing something like this each week: Upper A • 2-3 sets of “The GREATEST Triceps exercise known to man” • 2-3 sets of Supinated Grip Curls w/ Upper Arm Support • 2-3 sets of Machine or Cable Overhead Extensions • 2-3 sets of Hammer Grip Curls w/ Upper Arm Support Upper B (Performed 3-4 days after Upper A) • 2-3 sets of Dip Machine • 2-3 sets of Machine or Cable Preacher Curls • 2-3 sets of “The GREATEST Triceps exercise known to man” OR Machine or Cable Overhead Extensions • 2-3 sets of Hammer Grip Curls w/ Upper Arm Support This will result in you doing somewhere between 8-12 sets of direct Bicep and Tricep work per week Low likelihood you need any more volume than that to improve your Arms mightily if following the notes below: 1) The ideal rep range to be using when performing the exercises mentioned is the 5ish to 10ish rep range — Choose a weight you can do for 5, 6, 7 reps @ 0-2 RIR…once you can do that weight for 8, 9, 10ish reps, increase the load by 5ish pounds 2) You should perform all reps of all the listed exercises with a controlled (but not overly slow) eccentric and an explosive (but still controlled) concentric 3) You should perform these exercises very early in your workout to ensure they are as efficient/effective as possible — If you perform them later on, you will not get as robust a growth stimulus from the sets because of the outstanding fatigue that will be present from the earlier sets/exercises in your workout Additional notes: - You may sub any of these exercises for comparable exercises due to preferences and/or equipment availability — Ex: Dip Machine subbed for Weighted Dips - I probably forgot something that I should’ve mentioned…if I think of it I’ll drop it in the post below

Dean Turner

66,141 次观看 • 4 个月前

Your investment portfolio needs muscle I used to think strength peaks around age 30. For 99.9999% of people, that’s nonsense. The only strength that truly peaks early is for world champions. Everyone below that level can keep getting stronger for their entire life. Between 40 and 60, you lose about 1% muscle mass and 1% strength per year if you do nothing. But if you train, you can more than make up for that 1%. After 60, the decline accelerates. That does not mean you cannot train it back. Just look at the 70 plus world records. Those athletes are all far stronger than me. I’m 44 now and I just set a new PR: 3 sets of 6 reps strict press at 80 kg (176 lbs), with two minutes of rest between sets. This helps my investing more than you’d think. Muscle absorbs glucose. More muscle means lower blood sugar. Aging without training slowly pushes blood sugar up, which increases the risk of all kinds of diseases. A fit body is a fit mind.

Your investment portfolio needs muscle I used to think strength peaks around age 30. For 99.9999% of people, that’s nonsense. The only strength that truly peaks early is for world champions. Everyone below that level can keep getting stronger for their entire life. Between 40 and 60, you lose about 1% muscle mass and 1% strength per year if you do nothing. But if you train, you can more than make up for that 1%. After 60, the decline accelerates. That does not mean you cannot train it back. Just look at the 70 plus world records. Those athletes are all far stronger than me. I’m 44 now and I just set a new PR: 3 sets of 6 reps strict press at 80 kg (176 lbs), with two minutes of rest between sets. This helps my investing more than you’d think. Muscle absorbs glucose. More muscle means lower blood sugar. Aging without training slowly pushes blood sugar up, which increases the risk of all kinds of diseases. A fit body is a fit mind.

Karel Mercx

33,083 次观看 • 5 个月前

Time under tension is a red herring. If TUT mattered, planks would build massive abs. They don't. Because there's no progressive overload of mechanical tension. The plank gets longer. The abs don't. A 5-rep set takes around 15 seconds. A 15-rep set takes around 45 seconds. Both can produce the same hypertrophy if both are taken close enough to failure. The growth doesn't come from the duration. It comes from the mechanical tension in the hard reps. The ones at the end of the set where the bar is barely moving and the muscle is recruiting every available fibre to finish the rep. You can hold a light weight for 60 seconds and get nothing. You can lift a heavy weight for 15 seconds and grow. Time doesn't build muscle. Tension does. Stop counting seconds. Start counting how close you got to failure.

Time under tension is a red herring. If TUT mattered, planks would build massive abs. They don't. Because there's no progressive overload of mechanical tension. The plank gets longer. The abs don't. A 5-rep set takes around 15 seconds. A 15-rep set takes around 45 seconds. Both can produce the same hypertrophy if both are taken close enough to failure. The growth doesn't come from the duration. It comes from the mechanical tension in the hard reps. The ones at the end of the set where the bar is barely moving and the muscle is recruiting every available fibre to finish the rep. You can hold a light weight for 60 seconds and get nothing. You can lift a heavy weight for 15 seconds and grow. Time doesn't build muscle. Tension does. Stop counting seconds. Start counting how close you got to failure.

Sama Hoole

21,435 次观看 • 2 个月前

Every man lives two lives. The second begins when he realises that he can max out hypertrophy in 15 second sets. The only reps that build muscle are the last 4 to 5 before failure. That's where the bar slows involuntarily, where high-threshold motor units are finally recruited, where actin and myosin form the maximum cross-bridges at the same time. That's mechanical tension. That's the only thing the muscle reads. Everything else is filler. The tempo doesn't matter. The muscle is 30 to 50% stronger on the eccentric, so lowering the weight slowly doesn't add stimulus, it just forces a lighter concentric. The pump doesn't matter. Lactate infusions don't grow muscle. Blood flow restriction on resting muscle doesn't grow muscle. The pump is a feeling, not a signal. The mind-muscle connection doesn't matter. Your brain cannot preferentially recruit fibres. It can only tell the muscle to contract. Everything past that is pretence. Pick a weight heavy enough that the fourth or fifth rep slows down on its own. Drive it up. Stop one short. Rack it. That set took 15 seconds. It did everything the 3 sets of 12 promised you and failed to deliver. Go home.

Every man lives two lives. The second begins when he realises that he can max out hypertrophy in 15 second sets. The only reps that build muscle are the last 4 to 5 before failure. That's where the bar slows involuntarily, where high-threshold motor units are finally recruited, where actin and myosin form the maximum cross-bridges at the same time. That's mechanical tension. That's the only thing the muscle reads. Everything else is filler. The tempo doesn't matter. The muscle is 30 to 50% stronger on the eccentric, so lowering the weight slowly doesn't add stimulus, it just forces a lighter concentric. The pump doesn't matter. Lactate infusions don't grow muscle. Blood flow restriction on resting muscle doesn't grow muscle. The pump is a feeling, not a signal. The mind-muscle connection doesn't matter. Your brain cannot preferentially recruit fibres. It can only tell the muscle to contract. Everything past that is pretence. Pick a weight heavy enough that the fourth or fifth rep slows down on its own. Drive it up. Stop one short. Rack it. That set took 15 seconds. It did everything the 3 sets of 12 promised you and failed to deliver. Go home.

Sama Hoole

112,572 次观看 • 3 个月前

8-12 reps per set is for hypertrophy That’s the pump fake everyone feel for. Shame on the “industry” The primary driver of hypertrophy is mechanical tension. They say the reps near failure matter most, but they never say why. Reps near failure matter most because they recruit your bigger stronger type II muscle fibers which is needed for hypertrophy In a set of 8-12, towards the end, your smaller weaker type I fibers start to fatigue forcing your body to recruit those type II fibers What they don’t tell you is you can optimize both mechanical tension and motor recruitment simply by lifting heavier weights for less reps per set. Adding weight you start the set near failure and recruit those type II fibers from the first rep. You avoid the junk volume 3x10 is not 3x10. It’s 30 reps. 10x3 is also 30 reps. Except you’re using MUCH more weight and most if not all reps are near failure. Oh and by the way, the nature of lifting heavier weights you also get much stronger than only doing 3x10. You say the studies show that you high and low rep ranges produce “similar” hypertrophy??? No, those studies are very misleading

8-12 reps per set is for hypertrophy That’s the pump fake everyone feel for. Shame on the “industry” The primary driver of hypertrophy is mechanical tension. They say the reps near failure matter most, but they never say why. Reps near failure matter most because they recruit your bigger stronger type II muscle fibers which is needed for hypertrophy In a set of 8-12, towards the end, your smaller weaker type I fibers start to fatigue forcing your body to recruit those type II fibers What they don’t tell you is you can optimize both mechanical tension and motor recruitment simply by lifting heavier weights for less reps per set. Adding weight you start the set near failure and recruit those type II fibers from the first rep. You avoid the junk volume 3x10 is not 3x10. It’s 30 reps. 10x3 is also 30 reps. Except you’re using MUCH more weight and most if not all reps are near failure. Oh and by the way, the nature of lifting heavier weights you also get much stronger than only doing 3x10. You say the studies show that you high and low rep ranges produce “similar” hypertrophy??? No, those studies are very misleading

Official Strength Debates

52,398 次观看 • 3 个月前

Doesn’t the BF and Muscle mass have more to do with diet than anything else? Also, in my experience, should only go to “failure”RPE 9-10 on the top set of compound movements, not every set. And then progressive overload each week. IE: here is a set of 8 that was RPE of 7. Next set would be top set. 4-6 reps RPE 9-10

Doesn’t the BF and Muscle mass have more to do with diet than anything else? Also, in my experience, should only go to “failure”RPE 9-10 on the top set of compound movements, not every set. And then progressive overload each week. IE: here is a set of 8 that was RPE of 7. Next set would be top set. 4-6 reps RPE 9-10

Ant Nat

23,600 次观看 • 1 年前

This is how I paid my rent this Monday morning: I woke up at 4: 45 am. BENEDICTION • I meditated and prayed. • I read the book OUTLIVE: The Science & Art Of Longevity by Dr Peter Attia. The chapter is about "Rethinking Medicine for the Age of Chronic Disease." BED • I organized the bedroom, living room, and study area. I decluttered the bookshelf, drew the curtains, and opened the windows to welcome fresh air and early morning sunlight. BODY • I jogged to the gym, 2 km away. Pace: 05'26" /km. Time:13 minutes. Warm-up • Box jumps: 12 x 3 sets • Burpees: 10 x 2 sets Workouts • Dumbbell Goblet Squat, 30 kg, 12 reps x 4 sets • Barbell Bent-over rows 40 kg, 10 reps x 4 sets • Barbell Overhead Shoulder Press, 30 kg, 10 reps x 2 sets, 40 kg, 4 reps x 2 sets • Barbell Bench Press, 60 kg, 10 reps x 3 sets • Regular push-ups 15 reps x 2 sets • Breathing 4 — 7 — 8 in 2 sets. BATH I had a cold bath and took Apple Cider Vinegar in warm water. #ManDay

This is how I paid my rent this Monday morning: I woke up at 4: 45 am. BENEDICTION • I meditated and prayed. • I read the book OUTLIVE: The Science & Art Of Longevity by Dr Peter Attia. The chapter is about "Rethinking Medicine for the Age of Chronic Disease." BED • I organized the bedroom, living room, and study area. I decluttered the bookshelf, drew the curtains, and opened the windows to welcome fresh air and early morning sunlight. BODY • I jogged to the gym, 2 km away. Pace: 05'26" /km. Time:13 minutes. Warm-up • Box jumps: 12 x 3 sets • Burpees: 10 x 2 sets Workouts • Dumbbell Goblet Squat, 30 kg, 12 reps x 4 sets • Barbell Bent-over rows 40 kg, 10 reps x 4 sets • Barbell Overhead Shoulder Press, 30 kg, 10 reps x 2 sets, 40 kg, 4 reps x 2 sets • Barbell Bench Press, 60 kg, 10 reps x 3 sets • Regular push-ups 15 reps x 2 sets • Breathing 4 — 7 — 8 in 2 sets. BATH I had a cold bath and took Apple Cider Vinegar in warm water. #ManDay

Eric

206,738 次观看 • 1 年前

The pump feels like growth. The muscle is visibly bigger in the mirror. Brain says: "Look at it. That's why I came here." The pump is blood pooled in a muscle from repeated contractions restricting venous return. The veins fill faster than they drain. The muscle inflates. Growth happens when heavy load is taken close to failure, triggering protein synthesis over the next 24 to 48 hours. The pump is not part of it. You can get a massive pump from 30 reps of 2kg lateral raises. The growth stimulus is approximately nothing. You can get almost no pump from 5 heavy barbell rows. The growth stimulus is everything. The damage is in the template. Chasing a pump means high reps and short rest, which produces enormous junk fatigue for very little growth signal, and quietly trains you to judge a session by feeling instead of by the bar getting heavier. You walk out pumped. You walk out tired. The bar has not moved in six months. The mirror after the workout is showing you fluid. The mirror six months later is showing you load. Train for the second mirror.

The pump feels like growth. The muscle is visibly bigger in the mirror. Brain says: "Look at it. That's why I came here." The pump is blood pooled in a muscle from repeated contractions restricting venous return. The veins fill faster than they drain. The muscle inflates. Growth happens when heavy load is taken close to failure, triggering protein synthesis over the next 24 to 48 hours. The pump is not part of it. You can get a massive pump from 30 reps of 2kg lateral raises. The growth stimulus is approximately nothing. You can get almost no pump from 5 heavy barbell rows. The growth stimulus is everything. The damage is in the template. Chasing a pump means high reps and short rest, which produces enormous junk fatigue for very little growth signal, and quietly trains you to judge a session by feeling instead of by the bar getting heavier. You walk out pumped. You walk out tired. The bar has not moved in six months. The mirror after the workout is showing you fluid. The mirror six months later is showing you load. Train for the second mirror.

Sama Hoole

17,883 次观看 • 2 个月前

Every man lives two lives.⠀ ⠀ The second begins the day he realises that two sets of six builds more muscle than four sets of twelve, in half the time, with a quarter of the recovery cost.⠀ ⠀ Because the only thing that produces hypertrophy is high-quality reps performed in close proximity to failure. Specifically, the final five.⠀ ⠀ Heavy loads are simply the easier vehicle for getting there.⠀ ⠀ There's less afferent feedback, less lactic burn, less screaming from the metabolites telling you to stop before the working fibres have actually been challenged.⠀ ⠀ There's more focus and more quality control, because each set lasts twenty seconds rather than forty to sixty, and the nervous system can stay sharp across all of it.⠀ ⠀ There's more strength carryover, because the loads are heavy enough to demand explosive intent on every single rep.⠀ ⠀ And there's less fatigue, so the growth stimulus survives intact across the exercise, the session, and the week.⠀ ⠀ It becomes a straightforward decision once you:⠀ ⠀ - Accept there is only one true driver of hypertrophy⠀ - Understand that more is not better⠀ - Accept that better is better

Every man lives two lives.⠀ ⠀ The second begins the day he realises that two sets of six builds more muscle than four sets of twelve, in half the time, with a quarter of the recovery cost.⠀ ⠀ Because the only thing that produces hypertrophy is high-quality reps performed in close proximity to failure. Specifically, the final five.⠀ ⠀ Heavy loads are simply the easier vehicle for getting there.⠀ ⠀ There's less afferent feedback, less lactic burn, less screaming from the metabolites telling you to stop before the working fibres have actually been challenged.⠀ ⠀ There's more focus and more quality control, because each set lasts twenty seconds rather than forty to sixty, and the nervous system can stay sharp across all of it.⠀ ⠀ There's more strength carryover, because the loads are heavy enough to demand explosive intent on every single rep.⠀ ⠀ And there's less fatigue, so the growth stimulus survives intact across the exercise, the session, and the week.⠀ ⠀ It becomes a straightforward decision once you:⠀ ⠀ - Accept there is only one true driver of hypertrophy⠀ - Understand that more is not better⠀ - Accept that better is better

Sama Hoole

295,795 次观看 • 2 个月前

"How long should I rest between sets?" Until you can hit the same weight for the same reps with the same quality. That is the answer. That has always been the answer. The answer is not 60 seconds. The answer is not 90 seconds. The answer is not whatever the timer on your watch app says. If you are doing heavy compounds, that might be 3 to 5 minutes. Sometimes longer. The exercise does not care about your podcast schedule. It needs the central nervous system to be ready and the muscles to be loaded again. Rushing rest periods is one of the great unforced errors in training. You sacrifice load, sacrifice reps, sacrifice tension, and convince yourself you have done a hard session because you sweated. You have done a cardio session with weights. They are not the same. Sit down. Breathe. Let the heart settle. Then lift the next set heavy enough to justify the wait.

"How long should I rest between sets?" Until you can hit the same weight for the same reps with the same quality. That is the answer. That has always been the answer. The answer is not 60 seconds. The answer is not 90 seconds. The answer is not whatever the timer on your watch app says. If you are doing heavy compounds, that might be 3 to 5 minutes. Sometimes longer. The exercise does not care about your podcast schedule. It needs the central nervous system to be ready and the muscles to be loaded again. Rushing rest periods is one of the great unforced errors in training. You sacrifice load, sacrifice reps, sacrifice tension, and convince yourself you have done a hard session because you sweated. You have done a cardio session with weights. They are not the same. Sit down. Breathe. Let the heart settle. Then lift the next set heavy enough to justify the wait.

Sama Hoole

26,463 次观看 • 2 个月前

You don't need arm days to build big arms. Pure heresy in the bro-science scriptures, I know. But 30 sets, six different angles and a conga line of finishers won't build them. That just buries the muscle in fatigue and damage faster than it can repair. Arms are small. They already take a beating from every row, chin and press you do. Pile an arm marathon on top and you sail straight past stimulation into the swamp, where the body is too busy patching torn tissue to build anything new. Here is the entire programme. One biceps exercise. One triceps exercise. Two heavy sets each. Twice a week. Lift heavy enough that the weight does the talking, then stop before fatigue muscles in. Give the arm one hard, clean reason to grow and leave it alone to get on with it. Four working sets a week, per arm. Watch them grow.

You don't need arm days to build big arms. Pure heresy in the bro-science scriptures, I know. But 30 sets, six different angles and a conga line of finishers won't build them. That just buries the muscle in fatigue and damage faster than it can repair. Arms are small. They already take a beating from every row, chin and press you do. Pile an arm marathon on top and you sail straight past stimulation into the swamp, where the body is too busy patching torn tissue to build anything new. Here is the entire programme. One biceps exercise. One triceps exercise. Two heavy sets each. Twice a week. Lift heavy enough that the weight does the talking, then stop before fatigue muscles in. Give the arm one hard, clean reason to grow and leave it alone to get on with it. Four working sets a week, per arm. Watch them grow.

Sama Hoole

75,409 次观看 • 1 个月前

Maintaining muscle mass, strength, and function as we age becomes critical to our independence and quality of life. Three terms often come up in this discussion: sarcopenia, dynapenia, and powerpenia. Understanding these concepts and their implications can reshape how we think about aging and exercise. Sarcopenia is the age-related loss of muscle mass and function. It is defined by smaller muscles and a diminished ability to perform physical tasks. Sarcopenia is linked to frailty, mobility issues, and an increased risk of falls. However, muscle mass alone is not the most reliable indicator of functional ability. Dynapenia focuses on the loss of muscle strength, independent of muscle size. Strength is essential for tasks like lifting objects or climbing stairs. While strength is a critical component of function, it doesn’t account for the speed or explosiveness required in many real-world activities. Powerpenia is the age-related decline in muscle power, which is strength applied with speed. Power is often overlooked, yet it’s crucial for activities like rising from a chair, catching yourself from a fall, or navigating uneven terrain. Power combines strength with speed, making it the most functionally relevant metric for daily life and mobility. A recent article in Frontiers in Physiology (PMID: 10961295) highlights the critical role of muscle power in preserving functional independence. Research shows that power is more predictive of mobility, balance, and fall prevention than strength or muscle size alone. This finding shifts the focus from simply building muscle to enhancing the quality and speed of movement. Training to improve power—such as explosive movements, plyometric exercises, or lifting lighter weights quickly—can profoundly affect aging populations. The ability to generate force rapidly can mean the difference between a fall and staying upright or between dependence and independence. Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and powerpenia represent interconnected challenges of aging. However, prioritizing muscle power offers a unique opportunity to address the most functionally relevant decline. While maintaining muscle mass and strength is important, integrating power-focused training into your routine may yield the greatest benefits for preserving mobility and preventing disability.

Maintaining muscle mass, strength, and function as we age becomes critical to our independence and quality of life. Three terms often come up in this discussion: sarcopenia, dynapenia, and powerpenia. Understanding these concepts and their implications can reshape how we think about aging and exercise. Sarcopenia is the age-related loss of muscle mass and function. It is defined by smaller muscles and a diminished ability to perform physical tasks. Sarcopenia is linked to frailty, mobility issues, and an increased risk of falls. However, muscle mass alone is not the most reliable indicator of functional ability. Dynapenia focuses on the loss of muscle strength, independent of muscle size. Strength is essential for tasks like lifting objects or climbing stairs. While strength is a critical component of function, it doesn’t account for the speed or explosiveness required in many real-world activities. Powerpenia is the age-related decline in muscle power, which is strength applied with speed. Power is often overlooked, yet it’s crucial for activities like rising from a chair, catching yourself from a fall, or navigating uneven terrain. Power combines strength with speed, making it the most functionally relevant metric for daily life and mobility. A recent article in Frontiers in Physiology (PMID: 10961295) highlights the critical role of muscle power in preserving functional independence. Research shows that power is more predictive of mobility, balance, and fall prevention than strength or muscle size alone. This finding shifts the focus from simply building muscle to enhancing the quality and speed of movement. Training to improve power—such as explosive movements, plyometric exercises, or lifting lighter weights quickly—can profoundly affect aging populations. The ability to generate force rapidly can mean the difference between a fall and staying upright or between dependence and independence. Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and powerpenia represent interconnected challenges of aging. However, prioritizing muscle power offers a unique opportunity to address the most functionally relevant decline. While maintaining muscle mass and strength is important, integrating power-focused training into your routine may yield the greatest benefits for preserving mobility and preventing disability.

Howard Luks MD

27,372 次观看 • 1 年前

The Bro Split that every young lad gets sold on looks like this.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Chest⠀ Tuesday: Back⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Legs⠀ Friday: Shoulders⠀ Saturday: Arms⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ And yes, Arnold did it. Arnold also took enough drugs to sedate a medium-sized country, so perhaps not the most transferable template.⠀ ⠀ The problem is simple. Each muscle here gets hit once a week. Train hard enough and you'll trigger a window of muscle protein synthesis that runs for roughly 2-3 days. After that the window closes, and the muscle fibres begin to catabolise slowly. The back half of the week isn't neutral. It's quietly eroding the growth stimulus you picked up on Monday.⠀ ⠀ Once a week is not a holding pattern. It's a losing one.⠀ ⠀ The fix is training each muscle at least twice. An upper/lower split does this cleanly.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Upper⠀ Tuesday: Lower⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Upper⠀ Friday: Rest⠀ Saturday: Lower⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ Same days in the gym. Every muscle getting two shots at the growth window per week instead of one.⠀ ⠀ If there's a specific muscle you want to bring up faster, glutes being the obvious example, you can push that to three times a week with a full body approach, hitting the priority muscle first in every session when you're freshest.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Wednesday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Friday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ ⠀ More frequent stimulus. More growth windows captured. Less of the week spent sliding backwards.⠀ ⠀ The Bro Split isn't useless. It just isn't optimal. And if you're going to spend the time, you may as well spend it on something that actually works.⠀ ⠀ Minimum twice a week per muscle. Three if you're serious about a lagging group. The rest is just detail.

The Bro Split that every young lad gets sold on looks like this.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Chest⠀ Tuesday: Back⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Legs⠀ Friday: Shoulders⠀ Saturday: Arms⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ And yes, Arnold did it. Arnold also took enough drugs to sedate a medium-sized country, so perhaps not the most transferable template.⠀ ⠀ The problem is simple. Each muscle here gets hit once a week. Train hard enough and you'll trigger a window of muscle protein synthesis that runs for roughly 2-3 days. After that the window closes, and the muscle fibres begin to catabolise slowly. The back half of the week isn't neutral. It's quietly eroding the growth stimulus you picked up on Monday.⠀ ⠀ Once a week is not a holding pattern. It's a losing one.⠀ ⠀ The fix is training each muscle at least twice. An upper/lower split does this cleanly.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Upper⠀ Tuesday: Lower⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Upper⠀ Friday: Rest⠀ Saturday: Lower⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ Same days in the gym. Every muscle getting two shots at the growth window per week instead of one.⠀ ⠀ If there's a specific muscle you want to bring up faster, glutes being the obvious example, you can push that to three times a week with a full body approach, hitting the priority muscle first in every session when you're freshest.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Wednesday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Friday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ ⠀ More frequent stimulus. More growth windows captured. Less of the week spent sliding backwards.⠀ ⠀ The Bro Split isn't useless. It just isn't optimal. And if you're going to spend the time, you may as well spend it on something that actually works.⠀ ⠀ Minimum twice a week per muscle. Three if you're serious about a lagging group. The rest is just detail.

Sama Hoole

24,136 次观看 • 3 个月前