Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🌲 A remote cabin. 💸 A struggling couple. 😏 An offer that changes everything. What starts as a chance meeting in the middle of nowhere quickly becomes a game of temptation, loyalty, and impossible choices. When money talks and emotions get involved, doing the right thing suddenly isn't so... show more

VIP4K

28,156 subscribers

19,753 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Gupta: I had a chance to speak to a lot of radiology colleagues at the best academic institutions in the country over the last 24 hours… They had justified getting an MRI of the torso for primary screening of some sort of medical process because he’s older, and that doesn’t exist. I’m not aware, and my colleagues across the spectrum in radiology are not aware, of that type of screening process. You just don’t do it. The fact that they reported only the cardiovascular and abdominal findings is odd. Did he get a full-body MRI because that’s in vogue among a certain subsegment of society, and they just reported the cardiac and the abdominal finding? Then why? Did they leave out everything else? Did they just get a torso MRI? Why These are the most credentialed radiologists in the country. I challenge anybody to find a group of people more credentialed and more accomplished and who know what to do and when to do MRIs than the folks I’ve spoken with. No one is aware of any type of screening guideline that says as you age you should get an MRI of the heart and abdomen.

Gupta: I had a chance to speak to a lot of radiology colleagues at the best academic institutions in the country over the last 24 hours… They had justified getting an MRI of the torso for primary screening of some sort of medical process because he’s older, and that doesn’t exist. I’m not aware, and my colleagues across the spectrum in radiology are not aware, of that type of screening process. You just don’t do it. The fact that they reported only the cardiovascular and abdominal findings is odd. Did he get a full-body MRI because that’s in vogue among a certain subsegment of society, and they just reported the cardiac and the abdominal finding? Then why? Did they leave out everything else? Did they just get a torso MRI? Why These are the most credentialed radiologists in the country. I challenge anybody to find a group of people more credentialed and more accomplished and who know what to do and when to do MRIs than the folks I’ve spoken with. No one is aware of any type of screening guideline that says as you age you should get an MRI of the heart and abdomen.

Acyn

184,940 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly

X Freeze

16,843,319 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

VVN talks about how she directs even the smallest of details in every song VVN: Taking the intro of izna's 'SIGN' as an example, when she sings 'Starlight 아래 (below),' there's this breathy sound that escapes right after '아래.' VVN: Even without that breathy sound, the appeal and emotion still come through, so it's really a paper-thin difference, but as a listener, it completely changes how it's delivered. Mai: When you notice those small details, and when they all come together, I think that's how a single work of art is created Sarang: So I think our own colour is able to come through in our songs more and more

VVN talks about how she directs even the smallest of details in every song VVN: Taking the intro of izna's 'SIGN' as an example, when she sings 'Starlight 아래 (below),' there's this breathy sound that escapes right after '아래.' VVN: Even without that breathy sound, the appeal and emotion still come through, so it's really a paper-thin difference, but as a listener, it completely changes how it's delivered. Mai: When you notice those small details, and when they all come together, I think that's how a single work of art is created Sarang: So I think our own colour is able to come through in our songs more and more

iznavibe

38,680 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

McGeehan: The first thing to understand is that World Cups are a scam, right? They’re a complete scam because the U.S. pays for everything, and FIFA walks away with all the profits. Now, Donald Trump probably knows it’s a scam. And if we know anything about Donald Trump, it’s that he doesn’t like getting scammed. I mean, this is the man who talks about The Art of the Deal. So, one theory—or one part of it—could just be this: Trump is basically saying, “Okay, you can come in here, you can waltz off with all the money, and you can put us on the hook for all the costs, but I’m going to get my part of this.” So that’s one theory. There are other people who think that Trump was involved in Gianni Infantino’s machinations when he became president back in 2016. I can’t speak to that, but certainly there’s a lot of money involved and a lot of money changing hands, and FIFA is walking away with a lot of it.

McGeehan: The first thing to understand is that World Cups are a scam, right? They’re a complete scam because the U.S. pays for everything, and FIFA walks away with all the profits. Now, Donald Trump probably knows it’s a scam. And if we know anything about Donald Trump, it’s that he doesn’t like getting scammed. I mean, this is the man who talks about The Art of the Deal. So, one theory—or one part of it—could just be this: Trump is basically saying, “Okay, you can come in here, you can waltz off with all the money, and you can put us on the hook for all the costs, but I’m going to get my part of this.” So that’s one theory. There are other people who think that Trump was involved in Gianni Infantino’s machinations when he became president back in 2016. I can’t speak to that, but certainly there’s a lot of money involved and a lot of money changing hands, and FIFA is walking away with a lot of it.

Acyn

105,358 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Arteta on Martin Zubimendi’s lack of rotation: “Well, there's been more rotation than I think any other team. So in some areas there are less. I think that's the one particular one that you are mentioning, probably.” On Zubimendi struggling for form: “Well, because obviously when you play that many games, to maintain the excellent level is almost impossible. “I haven't seen a single player probably in the Premier League this season to be able to do that. So, again, it's part of that journey as a player and the shorter it is, the better.” Reporter: “Do you get the sense that he's got the kind of mentality required to get through this particular moment?” “Yeah, because he's been so consistent and so intelligent and because he demands himself more than anybody else probably.”

Arteta on Martin Zubimendi’s lack of rotation: “Well, there's been more rotation than I think any other team. So in some areas there are less. I think that's the one particular one that you are mentioning, probably.” On Zubimendi struggling for form: “Well, because obviously when you play that many games, to maintain the excellent level is almost impossible. “I haven't seen a single player probably in the Premier League this season to be able to do that. So, again, it's part of that journey as a player and the shorter it is, the better.” Reporter: “Do you get the sense that he's got the kind of mentality required to get through this particular moment?” “Yeah, because he's been so consistent and so intelligent and because he demands himself more than anybody else probably.”

Connor Humm

401,573 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Zack Polanski, "It's a tax on assets of 1% on £10m+ or 2% on £1 billion+" "The most obvious win here is to bring Capital Gains Tax in line with Income Tax" "The reason why that's important is right now we tax earned income more than we tax unearned wealth" "If you're a cleaner, you could be paying more tax than the person who owns the building that you're cleaning" "It's completely absurd. It's a political choice. We can make different political choices" "When Ruth said it's difficult to find wealth, that there are practical challenges, so let's spend more money on HMRC" "We keep underspending on the NHS, it shouldn't be a surprise we have a sick population" "So yes, spend money up front on public infrastructure, on our services, but we're getting that money back, in terms of a much better economy and a healthier population" "It's outrageous that we would have any more spending cuts" "People in this country are tired and exhausted" "They see the cost of living raised and they're not seeing their wages go with it" "We have wealth in this country that we can redistribute" "So the idea that people who are already struggling, as a result of political decisions and consequences of the past decade, are going to have to suffer another round of cuts" "It's not a surprise to me when Nigel Farage talks about connecting with people's fear and anger, that's he doing so well" "Of course I say this because Reform UK's solutions will make things even worse" "That's why the Greens are doing so well right now, we're offering hope and some practical solutions" "To say we don't need to cut spending and actually we need to tax the wealthier in our country more and invest in public services"

Zack Polanski, "It's a tax on assets of 1% on £10m+ or 2% on £1 billion+" "The most obvious win here is to bring Capital Gains Tax in line with Income Tax" "The reason why that's important is right now we tax earned income more than we tax unearned wealth" "If you're a cleaner, you could be paying more tax than the person who owns the building that you're cleaning" "It's completely absurd. It's a political choice. We can make different political choices" "When Ruth said it's difficult to find wealth, that there are practical challenges, so let's spend more money on HMRC" "We keep underspending on the NHS, it shouldn't be a surprise we have a sick population" "So yes, spend money up front on public infrastructure, on our services, but we're getting that money back, in terms of a much better economy and a healthier population" "It's outrageous that we would have any more spending cuts" "People in this country are tired and exhausted" "They see the cost of living raised and they're not seeing their wages go with it" "We have wealth in this country that we can redistribute" "So the idea that people who are already struggling, as a result of political decisions and consequences of the past decade, are going to have to suffer another round of cuts" "It's not a surprise to me when Nigel Farage talks about connecting with people's fear and anger, that's he doing so well" "Of course I say this because Reform UK's solutions will make things even worse" "That's why the Greens are doing so well right now, we're offering hope and some practical solutions" "To say we don't need to cut spending and actually we need to tax the wealthier in our country more and invest in public services"

Farrukh

309,551 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Arteta says Football has evolved and unless they change rules it won't change: 🗣️ “I was really upset the way we (Arsenal) conceded a goal against Chelsea. And Chelsea, look, the quality that they have, the amount of set-piece they scored. “Manchester United, they're doing so well. The same, I was at Man City, used to work a lot on them. So it's something. “There are phases, and there are moments when a team has an opportunity to do certain things and the game is evolving, and the game is becoming more and more difficult. “Before, when you used to do a game plan and you just invert a full-back and bring an extra player in midfield or a false nine, opponents are finished. Big overload. 4v3 inside, 2v1 inside, time on the ball. So dominant 78% of possession, the other opponent two counterattacks, set pieces, the game is done now. “Teams are adapting, teams know, after every sequence of play, whether it's a throw-in, a restart of play, an open-page situation, after direct play, exactly what they have to do. “And everything is almost man-to-man. So it's going to be a different game unless we change the rules, because the evolution of the game is that.”

Arteta says Football has evolved and unless they change rules it won't change: 🗣️ “I was really upset the way we (Arsenal) conceded a goal against Chelsea. And Chelsea, look, the quality that they have, the amount of set-piece they scored. “Manchester United, they're doing so well. The same, I was at Man City, used to work a lot on them. So it's something. “There are phases, and there are moments when a team has an opportunity to do certain things and the game is evolving, and the game is becoming more and more difficult. “Before, when you used to do a game plan and you just invert a full-back and bring an extra player in midfield or a false nine, opponents are finished. Big overload. 4v3 inside, 2v1 inside, time on the ball. So dominant 78% of possession, the other opponent two counterattacks, set pieces, the game is done now. “Teams are adapting, teams know, after every sequence of play, whether it's a throw-in, a restart of play, an open-page situation, after direct play, exactly what they have to do. “And everything is almost man-to-man. So it's going to be a different game unless we change the rules, because the evolution of the game is that.”

Connor Humm

1,120,375 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Your 8th grade science teacher told you E=mc² and moved on. nobody told you what it actually means about you. Einstein didn't just write a physics equation. he proved that matter and energy are the same thing — two expressions of one substance. your body isn't a solid object that happens to have energy. your body is energy, currently showing up as form. A single paperclip, fully converted, releases the force of the Hiroshima bomb. that's what's locked inside ordinary matter. and you're made of billions of atoms of that same stuff. here's the shift that changes everything: stop thinking of yourself as a fixed, solid thing trying to generate energy. start thinking of yourself as energy that temporarily took a physical shape. Energy responds. energy shifts. energy is not stuck. when you relate to yourself as energy first — form second — the idea that your thoughts, emotions, and internal state shape your physical reality stops sounding spiritual. it starts sounding like basic physics. You are not small. you are not stuck. you are an unimaginable concentration of energy wearing a human shape for a while. ✨🙌🏾💫 © Elevenshot

Your 8th grade science teacher told you E=mc² and moved on. nobody told you what it actually means about you. Einstein didn't just write a physics equation. he proved that matter and energy are the same thing — two expressions of one substance. your body isn't a solid object that happens to have energy. your body is energy, currently showing up as form. A single paperclip, fully converted, releases the force of the Hiroshima bomb. that's what's locked inside ordinary matter. and you're made of billions of atoms of that same stuff. here's the shift that changes everything: stop thinking of yourself as a fixed, solid thing trying to generate energy. start thinking of yourself as energy that temporarily took a physical shape. Energy responds. energy shifts. energy is not stuck. when you relate to yourself as energy first — form second — the idea that your thoughts, emotions, and internal state shape your physical reality stops sounding spiritual. it starts sounding like basic physics. You are not small. you are not stuck. you are an unimaginable concentration of energy wearing a human shape for a while. ✨🙌🏾💫 © Elevenshot

🧬Maxpein🧬

15,592 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

I am currently rank one on the @_megaweapon_ $DEGEN leaderboard, and top five on the high score leaderboard. I see a lot of people struggling to reach high scores. Here's a quick guide/strategy and gameplay video on playing the ninja megaweapon. Phase 1: When the game starts and you aren't yet a megaweapon, mostly just ignore the bots and other players. Your focus should be grabbing and turning in the green blocks at a helipad. Obviously you still want to kill them as necessary, but dont focus on your KDA. Phase 2: When you become the ninja megaweapon, you'll want to play a hit and run style. The ninja has a stamina bar that also acts as a damage shield. If your stamina bar is gone, you are insanely squishy. So find a remote area of the map, preferably near a respawn point, kill an enemy or two and then retreat while the shield respawns. You want to avoid big groups where they can burst you down quickly with combined damage. On maps where there are houses, you can jump onto roofs to recharge your shield and be relatively safe. Phase 3: After you die as the megaweapon, simply repeat the above as time allows. When the game timer gets low, become more aggressive. You dont get bonus points for ending the game as the ninja, so when the clock winds down, take more risks to stack your killstreak. You will see me getting more reckless near the end of the video. Enjoy!

I am currently rank one on the @_megaweapon_ $DEGEN leaderboard, and top five on the high score leaderboard. I see a lot of people struggling to reach high scores. Here's a quick guide/strategy and gameplay video on playing the ninja megaweapon. Phase 1: When the game starts and you aren't yet a megaweapon, mostly just ignore the bots and other players. Your focus should be grabbing and turning in the green blocks at a helipad. Obviously you still want to kill them as necessary, but dont focus on your KDA. Phase 2: When you become the ninja megaweapon, you'll want to play a hit and run style. The ninja has a stamina bar that also acts as a damage shield. If your stamina bar is gone, you are insanely squishy. So find a remote area of the map, preferably near a respawn point, kill an enemy or two and then retreat while the shield respawns. You want to avoid big groups where they can burst you down quickly with combined damage. On maps where there are houses, you can jump onto roofs to recharge your shield and be relatively safe. Phase 3: After you die as the megaweapon, simply repeat the above as time allows. When the game timer gets low, become more aggressive. You dont get bonus points for ending the game as the ninja, so when the clock winds down, take more risks to stack your killstreak. You will see me getting more reckless near the end of the video. Enjoy!

Fogo

15,455 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Wang Yibo talks about balancing work and life - "when I was little, everything was very simple and pure. After I started working, there was a period of time when I stopped dancing and instead went into acting, I enjoyed it too, it was another form of joy that came from my work. But as the workload kept getting bigger and bigger, to the point where i couldn't really enjoy the process of acting anymore and that's when I started feeling tired. So I think it's really a question of balance." Ryder : "but you still enjoy being an actor now, right?" Yibo : "of course, by choosing to take on more work, I've also gained some things, that is, more choices in life. I think what I need is to take a break for a while, and then return, to rediscover that feeling of being an actor."

Wang Yibo talks about balancing work and life - "when I was little, everything was very simple and pure. After I started working, there was a period of time when I stopped dancing and instead went into acting, I enjoyed it too, it was another form of joy that came from my work. But as the workload kept getting bigger and bigger, to the point where i couldn't really enjoy the process of acting anymore and that's when I started feeling tired. So I think it's really a question of balance." Ryder : "but you still enjoy being an actor now, right?" Yibo : "of course, by choosing to take on more work, I've also gained some things, that is, more choices in life. I think what I need is to take a break for a while, and then return, to rediscover that feeling of being an actor."

kayyy

14,213 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Some millennials have been working for 20 years and are still confused by corporate 😂 For those who are still in the dark let me fill you in. Your performance doesn't matter. Your performance review doesn't matter. Your compensation has been set by a budget committee a year ago. You are not "overachieving" anything. Management has a fixed pool of money to pay the people they manage so they can give them raises less than inflation. If they give you more money, they have to give someone else less money. It's a zero-sum game. Managers actually have a larger pool of money to hire new employees because corporations recognize that new hires need to be incentivized to come over. They won't just leave their company for the same money. If you've been at the same company for 5 years you are underpaid. If you've been at the same company for 10 years you are paid less than a new hire at a competitor. Loyalty doesn't matter because there is no reason for a company to voluntarily pay you more money. Corporations already know that over 95% of employees will not go anywhere and will take whatever they get. Even if that's nothing. There's no reason to pay everybody more money when only a tiny percentage of workers will leave. Even if you leave... (remember over 95% of employees will not) ... the corporation will distribute the work you were doing among all your coworkers. And they will take on the extra work. And they will stay. For nothing. Because in addition to a salary, what an employee wants is to not have to look for a new job. That's all the want. They don't want to move anywhere. And companies know it, and they will take advantage of that. Now you know! You're welcome.

Some millennials have been working for 20 years and are still confused by corporate 😂 For those who are still in the dark let me fill you in. Your performance doesn't matter. Your performance review doesn't matter. Your compensation has been set by a budget committee a year ago. You are not "overachieving" anything. Management has a fixed pool of money to pay the people they manage so they can give them raises less than inflation. If they give you more money, they have to give someone else less money. It's a zero-sum game. Managers actually have a larger pool of money to hire new employees because corporations recognize that new hires need to be incentivized to come over. They won't just leave their company for the same money. If you've been at the same company for 5 years you are underpaid. If you've been at the same company for 10 years you are paid less than a new hire at a competitor. Loyalty doesn't matter because there is no reason for a company to voluntarily pay you more money. Corporations already know that over 95% of employees will not go anywhere and will take whatever they get. Even if that's nothing. There's no reason to pay everybody more money when only a tiny percentage of workers will leave. Even if you leave... (remember over 95% of employees will not) ... the corporation will distribute the work you were doing among all your coworkers. And they will take on the extra work. And they will stay. For nothing. Because in addition to a salary, what an employee wants is to not have to look for a new job. That's all the want. They don't want to move anywhere. And companies know it, and they will take advantage of that. Now you know! You're welcome.

Lazy Canadian Investor

66,816 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Kaitlin asked one simple question about Trump… and the answer quickly turned into a struggle. In the video, a woman confidently explains that she’s strongly against Donald Trump and insists he’s done things she “vehemently” disagrees with. But when Kaitlin calmly asks her to name one specific policy or action, the confidence suddenly fades. She pauses… shifts around… and starts searching for an answer. Kaitlin keeps it simple: “Just name one.” Instead of giving a clear example, the response turns into vague talking points and awkward pauses while the crowd walks by behind them. What started as a confident stance slowly turns into a moment where Kaitlin knows the topic better than the person criticizing it. It’s one of those clips where the conversation says more than the answer ever could. If you’re strongly against a politician, shouldn’t you at least be able to name one reason why? 🤔

Kaitlin asked one simple question about Trump… and the answer quickly turned into a struggle. In the video, a woman confidently explains that she’s strongly against Donald Trump and insists he’s done things she “vehemently” disagrees with. But when Kaitlin calmly asks her to name one specific policy or action, the confidence suddenly fades. She pauses… shifts around… and starts searching for an answer. Kaitlin keeps it simple: “Just name one.” Instead of giving a clear example, the response turns into vague talking points and awkward pauses while the crowd walks by behind them. What started as a confident stance slowly turns into a moment where Kaitlin knows the topic better than the person criticizing it. It’s one of those clips where the conversation says more than the answer ever could. If you’re strongly against a politician, shouldn’t you at least be able to name one reason why? 🤔

❤🎹 Ames 🎹❤

157,269 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Is easy to get discouraged after defi exploits HOWEVER its worth noting that they pale in comparison to the private credit crisis in tradfi-land... I've been wanting to highlight my good bro Martin de Rijke's recent appearance on The Rollup and he actually touched on this exact topic in it... Martin is Head Of Growth at Maple, and he spoke with Andy and Robbie Klages all about everything Maple is doing 💪 As he explains in the interview, Martin's been involved with crypto since 2015 and has been a part of the Maple team since 2022, so he has been instrumental in the project's massive success, and had a ton of interesting stuff to say regarding both Maple and defi as a whole... Below clip is- again- on the private credit crisis in macro and whether it can be an opportunity for defi and for Maple, and then it also touches on Maple's overall business model and some other interesting stuff toward the end. As noted above, the private credit crisis is far larger in scope than these defi exploits, and it is also quite representative of the problems in tradfi that defi solves - the fact that it is opaque and corrupt and is based on giant webs of counterparties where there is no way to confirm where your money is and no blockchain to check... In this regard it is an apt reminder of the inherent superiority of blockchain-based financial rails, and the value in what we are all doing here... But yeah, as always, I own a ton of $SYRUP and work with the Maple team, so will flip the 'partner' tag on this 💪 And then will also include a couple more interesting clips from the interview below, and link to the full discussion :) Massive respect to Martin for the great interview!!! 💪🥞 He's been a wonderful friend of mine for as long as I've known him and I HIGHLY, HIGHLY recommend giving him a follow on here if you aren't already doing so! :)

Is easy to get discouraged after defi exploits HOWEVER its worth noting that they pale in comparison to the private credit crisis in tradfi-land... I've been wanting to highlight my good bro Martin de Rijke's recent appearance on The Rollup and he actually touched on this exact topic in it... Martin is Head Of Growth at Maple, and he spoke with Andy and Robbie Klages all about everything Maple is doing 💪 As he explains in the interview, Martin's been involved with crypto since 2015 and has been a part of the Maple team since 2022, so he has been instrumental in the project's massive success, and had a ton of interesting stuff to say regarding both Maple and defi as a whole... Below clip is- again- on the private credit crisis in macro and whether it can be an opportunity for defi and for Maple, and then it also touches on Maple's overall business model and some other interesting stuff toward the end. As noted above, the private credit crisis is far larger in scope than these defi exploits, and it is also quite representative of the problems in tradfi that defi solves - the fact that it is opaque and corrupt and is based on giant webs of counterparties where there is no way to confirm where your money is and no blockchain to check... In this regard it is an apt reminder of the inherent superiority of blockchain-based financial rails, and the value in what we are all doing here... But yeah, as always, I own a ton of $SYRUP and work with the Maple team, so will flip the 'partner' tag on this 💪 And then will also include a couple more interesting clips from the interview below, and link to the full discussion :) Massive respect to Martin for the great interview!!! 💪🥞 He's been a wonderful friend of mine for as long as I've known him and I HIGHLY, HIGHLY recommend giving him a follow on here if you aren't already doing so! :)

rektdiomedes

12,195 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"[Doctors are] basically glorified sales reps for Big Pharma and hospitals are their front-facing sales departments." "When the incentives reward chronic illness more than lifelong health, you get exactly what we have today—a population sicker than ever... trained to outsource its health to a pill bottle." "Real health does not come from a hospital stay. It comes from... taking radical responsibility for your own body." "It starts in your kitchen, your habits, your choices... In the moment you decide you will no longer be a customer, but a caretaker of your own health." "The system isn't broken. It's doing exactly what it was designed to do." "And the moment you understand that is the moment you begin to take your power back."

"[Doctors are] basically glorified sales reps for Big Pharma and hospitals are their front-facing sales departments." "When the incentives reward chronic illness more than lifelong health, you get exactly what we have today—a population sicker than ever... trained to outsource its health to a pill bottle." "Real health does not come from a hospital stay. It comes from... taking radical responsibility for your own body." "It starts in your kitchen, your habits, your choices... In the moment you decide you will no longer be a customer, but a caretaker of your own health." "The system isn't broken. It's doing exactly what it was designed to do." "And the moment you understand that is the moment you begin to take your power back."

Wide Awake Media

13,835 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This is by far my favourite minute of the $OPEN house. For anyone who doesn't understand what $OPEN wants to do, the CEO gives you a tell right here. This is happening in real time right now. This man is a genius. Basically $OPEN wants to own everything when it comes to buying and selling a home, the whole chain. As he says in the clip: "The buying, the selling, the mortgage and the insurance." So they can offer a seller a price he or she can't refuse (given perks like speed, certainty, and other soft attributes a traditional broker just cannot guarantee). They can offer the buyer a fair price, with the same perks. Speed, simplicity, certainty. Their AI mortgage gives the buyer the best price on the market and hooks the buyer for life. And then insurance on top of that. And there you go! A loyal and happy customer for life. As Kaz explains further. The easier this process becomes, the easier it is to move, more demand will be created. Thus more customers. And the loop continues. Now tell me, what company can compete with $OPEN when this is done? (and it is happening right now). Just the moat of $OPEN will be worth an insane amount of money.

This is by far my favourite minute of the $OPEN house. For anyone who doesn't understand what $OPEN wants to do, the CEO gives you a tell right here. This is happening in real time right now. This man is a genius. Basically $OPEN wants to own everything when it comes to buying and selling a home, the whole chain. As he says in the clip: "The buying, the selling, the mortgage and the insurance." So they can offer a seller a price he or she can't refuse (given perks like speed, certainty, and other soft attributes a traditional broker just cannot guarantee). They can offer the buyer a fair price, with the same perks. Speed, simplicity, certainty. Their AI mortgage gives the buyer the best price on the market and hooks the buyer for life. And then insurance on top of that. And there you go! A loyal and happy customer for life. As Kaz explains further. The easier this process becomes, the easier it is to move, more demand will be created. Thus more customers. And the loop continues. Now tell me, what company can compete with $OPEN when this is done? (and it is happening right now). Just the moat of $OPEN will be worth an insane amount of money.

Mr Never Sell

15,672 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

"[Doctors are] basically glorified sales reps for Big Pharma and hospitals are their front-facing sales departments." "When the incentives reward chronic illness more than lifelong health, you get exactly what we have today—a population sicker than ever... trained to outsource its health to a pill bottle." "Real health does not come from a hospital stay. It comes from... taking radical responsibility for your own body." "It starts in your kitchen, your habits, your choices... In the moment you decide you will no longer be a customer, but a caretaker of your own health." "The system isn't broken. It's doing exactly what it was designed to do." "And the moment you understand that is the moment you begin to take your power back."

"[Doctors are] basically glorified sales reps for Big Pharma and hospitals are their front-facing sales departments." "When the incentives reward chronic illness more than lifelong health, you get exactly what we have today—a population sicker than ever... trained to outsource its health to a pill bottle." "Real health does not come from a hospital stay. It comes from... taking radical responsibility for your own body." "It starts in your kitchen, your habits, your choices... In the moment you decide you will no longer be a customer, but a caretaker of your own health." "The system isn't broken. It's doing exactly what it was designed to do." "And the moment you understand that is the moment you begin to take your power back."

healthbot

21,869 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Aaron Boone was asked if he's considering giving Austin Wells a couple of days off to reset: "I don't know. His last at-bat he smoked a ball, so I'm hoping that's something that kind of gets him rolling. Through this stretch, I think he's struggled a little bit against some left-handed pitchers and he's faced a lot of those through this, whether it's in the middle of the game when they match up against our lefties. We'll see. As good as he is behind the plate, I have a lot of faith and trust in J.C. Escarra behind the plate, too, what he brings to the table. Obviously, we got to get him going. We want to get him going because when he's right, he's a presence, especially down in the bottom of the order. We got to get him there."

Aaron Boone was asked if he's considering giving Austin Wells a couple of days off to reset: "I don't know. His last at-bat he smoked a ball, so I'm hoping that's something that kind of gets him rolling. Through this stretch, I think he's struggled a little bit against some left-handed pitchers and he's faced a lot of those through this, whether it's in the middle of the game when they match up against our lefties. We'll see. As good as he is behind the plate, I have a lot of faith and trust in J.C. Escarra behind the plate, too, what he brings to the table. Obviously, we got to get him going. We want to get him going because when he's right, he's a presence, especially down in the bottom of the order. We got to get him there."

SNY Yankees

41,226 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Ta-Nehisi Coates: "I don't know how you stay consistent by claiming an anti-apartheid legacy here in the United States of America while enforcing it abroad." Coates is implying that Israel, a state that guarantees full rights to all citizens regardless of background, is an apartheid. This isn't the first time. Coates once made a trip to the West Bank, which he concluded is an apartheid. There are problems in the West Bank, that's for sure, but Coates assigns all blame to Israel for attempts to protect its citizens, and none to Palestinian leadership who pay salaries to terrorists. Of course, to Coates, the specifics hardly matter, as he admits this is less about what you believe, and more about getting elected. When the truth doesn't matter, when Jewish life isn't considered worthy of protection, and when winning elections is straightforwardly the goal, Coates is right about one thing. That is not a continuation of a legacy of fighting for justice. Not at all.

Ta-Nehisi Coates: "I don't know how you stay consistent by claiming an anti-apartheid legacy here in the United States of America while enforcing it abroad." Coates is implying that Israel, a state that guarantees full rights to all citizens regardless of background, is an apartheid. This isn't the first time. Coates once made a trip to the West Bank, which he concluded is an apartheid. There are problems in the West Bank, that's for sure, but Coates assigns all blame to Israel for attempts to protect its citizens, and none to Palestinian leadership who pay salaries to terrorists. Of course, to Coates, the specifics hardly matter, as he admits this is less about what you believe, and more about getting elected. When the truth doesn't matter, when Jewish life isn't considered worthy of protection, and when winning elections is straightforwardly the goal, Coates is right about one thing. That is not a continuation of a legacy of fighting for justice. Not at all.

Hen Mazzig

65,199 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Calling the police on someone you love is a type of heartbreak that doesn't have a name. It’s the agonizing middle ground between loyalty and survival, where you have to choose between protecting someone’s future and protecting a life in the present. This video captures the moment a mother had to make the ultimate "hard call." When things escalated, she didn’t turn a blind eye or make excuses. She realized that loving her son didn't mean staying silent; it meant stepping up to ensure his girlfriend was safe and out of harm's way. It takes a special kind of strength to hold your own blood accountable. She chose peace over silence and safety over comfort. Protecting the vulnerable is the highest form of integrity, even when it feels like it’s costing you everything in the moment. We need more people who are willing to do what is right, even when it’s the hardest thing they’ve ever had to do. What would you do in her shoes?

Calling the police on someone you love is a type of heartbreak that doesn't have a name. It’s the agonizing middle ground between loyalty and survival, where you have to choose between protecting someone’s future and protecting a life in the present. This video captures the moment a mother had to make the ultimate "hard call." When things escalated, she didn’t turn a blind eye or make excuses. She realized that loving her son didn't mean staying silent; it meant stepping up to ensure his girlfriend was safe and out of harm's way. It takes a special kind of strength to hold your own blood accountable. She chose peace over silence and safety over comfort. Protecting the vulnerable is the highest form of integrity, even when it feels like it’s costing you everything in the moment. We need more people who are willing to do what is right, even when it’s the hardest thing they’ve ever had to do. What would you do in her shoes?

PeachProof

49,281 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Warren Buffett on why chasing yield on cash is a mistake: A Berkshire shareholder, Ed Schmidt, asks where all the sidelined money is being held, pointing out that every option looks bad: Banks paying nothing, risky corporate bonds, and government bonds that "seem less and less sound as each day passes." Buffett agrees the choices are poor, but says it doesn't matter, because Berkshire treats short-term money completely differently from most investors. "He's certainly right that all the choices are lousy for short-term money now, but we don't play around with short-term money." He explains that in 2008, before the crisis hit, Berkshire owned no commercial paper and no money market funds. The big money stayed in treasuries, earning almost nothing, and Buffett is blunt that the temptation to reach for a little more is exactly the trap to avoid: "The last thing in the world we would do at Berkshire is to try and get five or 10 or 20 or 30 basis points more by going into some other things with our short-term money." His framing for why is simple: "It is a parking place. It's an unattractive parking place, but it's a parking place where we know we'll get our car back when we want it." The reason that matters became clear in September 2008. Berkshire had committed $6.5 billion to the Mars-Wrigley deal months earlier, long before anyone knew what that autumn would bring. When the date arrived, the form of the money was everything: "I had to show up with $6.5 billion. I couldn't show up with a money market fund or some commercial paper or anything of the sort. I had to show up with cash." That's why his conviction lands where it does: "Virtually the only thing I feel good about in terms of having large amounts of ready cash is treasury bills." Charlie Munger puts it more sharply, reframing the whole question as a discipline issue rather than a yield issue: "I think it's really stupid to try and maximize returns on short-term money if you're an opportunistic game the way we are, where we want to suddenly deploy money." He points to pipelines that came up for sale on a Saturday and had to close by Monday. There was no room to be stuck in "some dubious instrument" when the cash was suddenly needed. Buffett adds his own version of the same story, a pipeline whose seller feared bankruptcy the following week and needed the money immediately, with regulatory clearance still pending. Berkshire offered to close early and let the regulators review everything afterward, even unwind the deal if required. The point being that readiness, not return, is what closes deals: "Our ability to come up with cash when people need it, and when the rest of the world is petrified for some reason, has enabled several deals to get done." And that is the entire logic behind holding tens of billions in treasuries earning almost nothing: "When somebody comes to us and they say we need a deal right now, we can do it, and they know we can do it, and it can be big. It just has to be attractive."

Warren Buffett on why chasing yield on cash is a mistake: A Berkshire shareholder, Ed Schmidt, asks where all the sidelined money is being held, pointing out that every option looks bad: Banks paying nothing, risky corporate bonds, and government bonds that "seem less and less sound as each day passes." Buffett agrees the choices are poor, but says it doesn't matter, because Berkshire treats short-term money completely differently from most investors. "He's certainly right that all the choices are lousy for short-term money now, but we don't play around with short-term money." He explains that in 2008, before the crisis hit, Berkshire owned no commercial paper and no money market funds. The big money stayed in treasuries, earning almost nothing, and Buffett is blunt that the temptation to reach for a little more is exactly the trap to avoid: "The last thing in the world we would do at Berkshire is to try and get five or 10 or 20 or 30 basis points more by going into some other things with our short-term money." His framing for why is simple: "It is a parking place. It's an unattractive parking place, but it's a parking place where we know we'll get our car back when we want it." The reason that matters became clear in September 2008. Berkshire had committed $6.5 billion to the Mars-Wrigley deal months earlier, long before anyone knew what that autumn would bring. When the date arrived, the form of the money was everything: "I had to show up with $6.5 billion. I couldn't show up with a money market fund or some commercial paper or anything of the sort. I had to show up with cash." That's why his conviction lands where it does: "Virtually the only thing I feel good about in terms of having large amounts of ready cash is treasury bills." Charlie Munger puts it more sharply, reframing the whole question as a discipline issue rather than a yield issue: "I think it's really stupid to try and maximize returns on short-term money if you're an opportunistic game the way we are, where we want to suddenly deploy money." He points to pipelines that came up for sale on a Saturday and had to close by Monday. There was no room to be stuck in "some dubious instrument" when the cash was suddenly needed. Buffett adds his own version of the same story, a pipeline whose seller feared bankruptcy the following week and needed the money immediately, with regulatory clearance still pending. Berkshire offered to close early and let the regulators review everything afterward, even unwind the deal if required. The point being that readiness, not return, is what closes deals: "Our ability to come up with cash when people need it, and when the rest of the world is petrified for some reason, has enabled several deals to get done." And that is the entire logic behind holding tens of billions in treasuries earning almost nothing: "When somebody comes to us and they say we need a deal right now, we can do it, and they know we can do it, and it can be big. It just has to be attractive."

Black Edge

46,500 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat