正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🇺🇦🇫🇷 A report on the Ukrainian Air Force’s Mirage 2000-5F fighter jets notes that pilots maintain multiple contingency dispersal locations. During missile or drone attacks, they immediately relocate and take off from alternative sites as soon as intelligence indicates incoming Shahed drones or cruise missiles targeting their primary base....

125,365 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

July 3 is the Day of Army Aviation of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and Day of Anti-Aircraft Missile Forces of the Air Forces of Ukraine. No one has ever done what Ukrainian pilots do every day. The pilots are protecting our Ukraine in an extremely challenging environment against a very strong and well-equipped enemy. Russia launches hundreds of Shahed drones at Ukraine daily, ballistic and cruise missiles are launched very often. Just on the night of June 29, over 500 Russian air targets were launched at Ukraine. Russia changes its tactics and updates the drones and missiles constantly. Ukraine needs to come up with new solutions against Russian attacks - and do so in real time, under attacks and with a lack of resources. Just as an example - Israel needed to use the Iron Dome, hundreds of aircraft, alleged Jordanian pilots, dozens or even hundreds of US missiles and other means to fight off attacks of a similar scale. Ukraine doesn't have such resources and such support - not even close. And yet, Ukraine fights off massive Russian attacks several times a week now. The Armed Forces are people first and foremost, a human experience. Ukrainian pilots earn their skills experience directly on the battlefield. Any mistake might lead to death. What the Ukrainian Armed Forces live through is unbelievable. I don't know any other country in the world that would sustain a war like this. But Ukraine stands. And we pay for this with the lives and health of our people.

Anton Gerashchenko

20,983 次观看 • 1 年前

First Drone vs. Manned Fighter Combat? On December 8, 2025, the Ukrainian Air Force confirmed the loss of a Su-27 fighter jet piloted by Lieutenant Colonel Yevhenii Ivanov, who was killed during a combat mission in the eastern direction. Yesterday, December 17, one Mi-24 was downed in same circumstances. Russian sources allege the aircraft was shot down, but Ukrainian statements describe the circumstances as under investigation, with no official confirmation of the cause. There are unverified Russian claims linking it to a modified Geran-2 drone equipped with an R-60 missile. Ukrainian intelligence has confirmed the existence of Geran-2 variants armed with R-60 air-to-air missiles, designed primarily to counter aircraft or helicopters approaching to intercept drone swarms. If independently verified, such an engagement could represent a significant milestone in drone-vs-manned aircraft combat. This development aligns with broader trends i mentioned in my previous article on Chinese high-altitude drones conducting air-to-air target acquisition from positions well above potential threats. Elon Musk has indeed argued that the future of warfare lies with unmanned aircraft, stating that manned fighter jets are becoming obsolete in the drone era and predicting a shift toward autonomous or remotely controlled systems. But i believe that it’s something to the next two decades. Sixth-generation aircraft concepts often emphasize manned platforms controlling swarms of drones (loyal wingmen), but the question pushes further: How will manned fighters compete against high-altitude unmanned systems operating 10–15 km above their service ceiling and potentially launching air-air hypersonic missiles? In January I will post an article on China's development of layered high-altitude drone systems for ISTAR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Reconnaissance), one optimized for aerial threats and another for naval targets. Recent Chinese programs, like high-altitude stealth drones, recharge stations and mothership concepts capable of deploying swarms, suggest active progress in this direction.

Patricia Marins

49,124 次观看 • 6 个月前

❗️❗️❗️🇺🇦🇫🇷 GOOD NEWS | “Following yesterday’s agreement with Emmanuel Macron, Ukraine will test a new SAMP/T air defense system capable of intercepting ballistic targets. At the moment, it is the only European alternative to the Patriot system. We expect to receive it from France this year,” — Zelensky said. 🔵 To clarify the situation: 🔹 According to previous reports, Ukraine has already received two SAMP/T air defense batteries from France and Italy, but they cannot currently intercept ballistic missiles, as they lack the latest anti-ballistic interceptors and modern radars required for that mission. The previously supplied ASTER-15 air defense missiles, with a range of about 30 km, are mainly designed to intercept aerodynamic targets such as cruise missiles, aircraft, helicopters, and drones. 🔸 Zelensky’s latest statement suggests two important developments regarding the upgrade of these SAMP/T systems to counter Russian ballistic missiles: 1️⃣ The deployment of the modern AESA radar Ground Fire 300 — a multifunctional radar capable of detection and target tracking at distances of 400–450 km, allowing effective engagement of ballistic targets. 2️⃣ The delivery of ASTER-30 interceptor missiles, equipped with active radar seekers. •Against aerodynamic targets, the range reaches up to 120 km. •Against ballistic missiles: ▪️ ASTER-30 Block 1 can intercept targets at 30–35 km. ▪️ ASTER-30 Block 1NT can intercept ballistic missiles at 45–55 km. 📌 Interceptions are performed at altitudes of approximately 20–22 km.

NSTRIKE

68,954 次观看 • 4 个月前

Flamingo strike on Russia. Enormous cruise missiles with a 6-meter wingspan, a warhead weighing nearly a ton, and a range of 3,000 km attacked regions of Russia, and for the first time since the start of the SMO, they reached the Sverdlovsk region, flying across the entire European part of the Russian Federation. One cruise missile was destroyed over the Chuvash Republic, the second diverted to the Republic of Tatarstan and was destroyed. Two missiles headed for Yekaterinburg via Bashkortostan. The one heading for Cheboksary diverted to the Mari El Republic and then on to Perm Krai. Two Flamingo cruise missiles were detected over the Udmurt Republic. Another cruise missile was flying from the Volgograd Region toward the Ulyanovsk Region. Airports in the overflight regions suspended operations. By three o'clock, Flamingo monitoring channels across all regions had gone silent. Apparently, none of the missiles reached their targets. No one was injured. The debris fell in a forest far from populated areas. However, the very fact that such a massive attack occurred less than a week after the previous one (in Vokninsk) suggests that their production line hadn't been destroyed. "vizioner_rf" I don't think these missiles were manufactured in Ukraine, but that's not the point. The point is that Russia waited for Ukraine to launch these strikes with heavy, long-range missiles against Russian territory. No damage, you say? Well, there will be damage; we'll have to wait a little longer.

Victor vicktop55 commentary

27,610 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN’S DRONE HUNTERS: A NIGHTMARE FOR U.S. AND ISRAELI UAVs Even under constant U.S. and Israeli airstrikes, Iran still intercepts enemy drones. The reason lies in a set of mobile, radar-silent air defense systems that are far harder to detect and destroy: 🔸 Missile 358 – a loitering anti-drone interceptor operating in autonomous “free hunt” mode. Flying at ~0.6 Mach with up to 100 km range and 8.5 km interception altitude, it can patrol airspace and engage targets like MQ-9 Reaper or Hermes-900 UAVs. Radio correction can improve accuracy but risks exposing the control node to enemy electronic surveillance. 🔸 AD-08 Majid – a mobile short-range air defense system using optical and thermal sensors instead of radar. Its IR-guided missiles reach ~2 Mach, with 8 km range and 6 km altitude, making the system difficult to detect for aircraft relying on radar warning receivers. 🔸 Repurposed R-73 / R-27T missiles – infrared air-to-air missiles adapted for ground launch from mobile platforms equipped with thermal sights. Similar improvised systems have previously downed UAVs and even aircraft — including a Saudi F-15S shot down by the Houthis in 2018. Unlike radar-based systems that can be quickly targeted by anti-radiation missiles, these mobile defenses are harder to detect and eliminate, allowing Iran to keep enemy UAV operations under constant pressure. Do you think radar-silent air defenses could really help Iran counter Western drones and aircraft?

NewRulesGeopolitics

119,673 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇺🇦🚀 The 19th Rocket Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has released information about previously unknown facts regarding the use of TOCHKA-U type missile systems during the war: 📍 “At the beginning of 2022, missile troops units were launching 120 km-range ballistic missiles daily from TOCHKA-U complexes at Russian positions”. 📍 “In Soviet-era warehouses, missiles without warheads, so-called missile ‘tails,’ were stored. Due to a shortage of warheads, a decision was made to use high-explosive aerial bombs. In less than a month, military personnel and engineers managed to replace the factory warhead with a high-explosive aerial bomb warhead, conducted all necessary tests, and began serial production of the new missiles.” 📍 “This made it possible to compensate for the missile shortage and ensure the continued fulfillment of tasks by missile troops units.” 🚀✈️ “In March 2022, after an attack with Ukrainian TOCHKA-U tactical missiles at the military airfield in Taganrog, a Russian IL-76 military transport aircraft was destroyed on the runway along with all personnel and equipment… Earlier, on February 25, 2022, the Millerovo airbase in the Rostov region was bombed, destroying a Russian SU-30SM fighter jet… Attacks with TOCHKA-U tactical missiles intensively bombed Russian troop positions in Kherson region, at the Chernoabeyevka airfield, and a ROPUCHA-class landing ship was destroyed by a direct missile hit in Berdyansk,” the rocket brigade statement said. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

77,744 次观看 • 8 个月前

Strategic Bombers Are More Relevant Than Ever Decades ago, these aircraft had to fly directly over their targets to drop bombs. That era is over, and things have only gotten easier for them. Now they are standoff platforms capable of launching modern, heavy, long-range missiles (thousands of kilometers), including hypersonics, in large quantities, without ever entering contested airspace. This proves they are far from obsolete and have become massive flying weapons platforms. These bombers operate in squadrons, with missile ranges of 1,000–5,500 km (cruise) or around 2,000 km (hypersonic), devastating warheads, and launched in high numbers. Hypersonics like Kinzhal, YJ-21, and the future ARRW can evade modern defenses, while cruise missiles like JASSM and Kh-101 achieve saturation at a much lower cost. Russian glide bombs are being motorized to become an even cheaper option, and there are already configurations where bombers carry up to 20 glide bombs. Imagine 5 B-52H Stratofortress launching 20–24 stealth AGM-158 JASSM-ER missiles with 1,000 km range each. That’s over 100 missiles in a single salvo. Or 5 Tu-160M2 launching 6 Kh-47M2 Kinzhal each, or in another configuration up to 12 Kh-101 missiles per aircraft. If you want to go further: what navy could survive a squadron salvo from Chinese H-6 or H-20 launching 4–6 anti-ship hypersonic missiles with 1,500–2,000 km range? Strategic bombers are more relevant than ever and now operate much more safely. In the future, in possible larger conflicts, we’ll see waves of 20 bombers launching salvos of 150–250 missiles, overwhelming defenses and causing immense destruction. These platforms provide extended reach at a far lower cost than medium- or long-range ground launched missiles. Not to mention the low operating costs of the B-52, Tu-95, and H-6, with the latter probably having even lower costs. The trend is toward missiles and bombs with ever-greater range, lower cost, and modular designs to be launched from bombers. We can expect these aircraft to remain in service for at least another 20–30 years.

Patricia Marins

19,267 次观看 • 5 个月前

The US may have to face an Iranian navy equipped with 2,000 missile launchers (VLS cells, deck containers and missile tubes.) Iran has been investing heavily in recent years in a low-cost, swarm-style navy. In recent days, I have discussed Iran reportedly holding around 5,000 sea mines in stock, along with numerous coastal batteries armed with anti-ship missiles capable of ranges up to 1,700 km. Yesterday, I argued that if the American force aims to overthrow the regime, it will be a failure because it lacks the scale to do so. However, if the goal is merely to play the part and pre-arrange an attack, half that force would suffice. What does Iran have in naval terms? 1. Large Ships (Frigates, Destroyers, and Base Ships) - Units: 12 ships (Mowj, Makran, Shahid Mahdavi classes). - Launchers: Deck containers and VLS (12–24 per base ship). - Anti-ship range: 1,000–1,700 km (Abu Mahdi missiles and others ballistic missiles in containers). - Anti-air range: 150 km (Sayyad-3). 2. Attack Catamarans (Shahid Soleimani Class) - Units: 5–6 units. - Launchers: 22–28 VLS cells + 6–8 box launchers. - Anti-ship range: 1,000– 1,700 km (Ghadr-380 and Abu Mahdi). - Anti-air range: 150 km (Sayyad-3 / Navvab). 3. Submarines (Kilo, Fateh, and Ghadir Classes) Iran operates about 25–30 submarines - Kilo Class (Large): 3 units. Launch Jask-2 cruise missiles via torpedo tubes. - Fateh Class (Medium): 3–4 units. Fully integrated with cruise missiles. - Ghadir Class (Mini-subs): 20-23 units. Specialists in ambushes in the Strait of Hormuz. - Range: Jask-2 cruise missiles with 300 km range (submerged launch). - High-speed Hoot supercavitating torpedoes. 4. Fast Attack Boats (Zulfiqar, Ashura, and Tondar Classes) - Units: ~300–500 armed units. - Launchers: 2–4 tubes or compact VLS (4–8 cells). - Anti-ship range: 700 km (Zolfaghar Basir / Nasr). - Anti-air range: 100 km (358 missile). Total Fleet Launchers: 1,600–2,000 units. Submarines' Key Advantage: Although they have fewer launchers than the fast boats, their ability to fire Jask-2 missiles while submerged enables surprise attacks against carrier strike groups, complementing the aerial saturation tactics used by catamarans and fast boats. Catamarans' Key Advantage: Stealthy design, armed with air defense and long-range missiles, employing hit-and-run tactics, posing a serious threat to any navy. If Iran is truly attacked and chooses to retaliate, we can expect true chaos in the global markets, as this conflict would impact the entire region. Iran is a country of 90million people. An heavy attack on Iran means war.

Patricia Marins

92,614 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇮🇷🇮🇱| NEW Documentary on the 12-day war interviewing a high-ranking Iranian Air Defense General. The general says that despite facing against a massive, technologically superior coalition (Israel & 33 countries), Iran’s air defense network remained fully operational despites suffering losses. He says that Iran successfully shot down nearly 196 enemy aircrafts (such as Hermes 900, and Heron 450, etc) and protected the country's airspace, though he admits to sustaining damage to defense systems and the loss of 35 military personnel. The General says Iran was under a massive hybrid warfare attack involving a massive volume of cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, stand-off weapons, and fighters. The general denied rumors that the Iranian air defense system was hacked or shut down. He insists the network did not stop working for "even a single moment." The general says that Iranian defense systems were struck, specifically by "stand-off" weapons (missiles fired from a distance). He also acknowledged the technological disadvantage in fighter jets where Iran operates 2nd generation aircraft while fighting against 5th generation aircrafts by the enemies, however praised the effectiveness of indigenous surface-to-air missiles (like Bavar-373 and 15 Khordad). He talks about Colonel Narimani in Tabriz who evacuated his staff but stayed behind alone to man the console, surviving a strike by 4 missiles (now a disabled veteran). The general also promised that Iran is working on technology to intercept advanced fighter jets (not just drones/missiles) and warns that any future threats will be met with a "crushing response."

Arya - آریا

116,957 次观看 • 7 个月前

The Telegram channel “Byt Ili” conducted a detailed analysis of the performance of Russian air defense during yesterday’s Ukrainian drone raid on Moscow. It was the first time that the operation of Russian air defense could be observed almost in real time. Key conclusions from the analysis: “Perhaps the most surprising thing for me in today’s strike on the Moscow oil refinery is the number of missed interceptions by Russian air defense systems against Ukrainian UAVs. In this compilation, I’ve specifically cut together the misses by ‘Pantsirs’. The selection is not complete. For the first time, we were able to observe in real time how Russian air defense operates during large-scale drone raids. And I have no rational explanation for why it performs THIS poorly. Yan Matveev described it most succinctly: ‘Air defense systems were deployed right in the city, missiles are flying chaotically in all directions and missing their targets; the threat from them is no less (and perhaps even greater) than from the drones themselves.’ But this still doesn’t answer the question: why is it like this? After all, these are UAVs flying at low speed — not cruise missiles, and certainly not ballistic ones. This can hardly even be described as a combined strike designed to overwhelm air defenses. The only fast-moving targets here were a few jet-powered UAVs like “Bars,” and there were very few of them. This is nowhere near the level of overload seen in Ukrainian air defenses during Russian combined missile strikes. And yet, even a strike of this scale creates chaos and confusion for Russian air defenses. It also leads to the conclusion that ‘Pantsir’ systems perform rather poorly against UAVs. Now it becomes clear why there is such a shortage of Pantsir missiles — because even slow Ukrainian drones sometimes cannot be shot down with two missiles. This is shown in videos 1 and 2 — two misses by a Pantsir against a single UAV, which ultimately hits its target. In video 3, a Pantsir misses the first UAV, misses the second, and only the third missile manages to shoot down the second UAV.” 1/

𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝕯𝔢𝔞𝔡 𝕯𝔦𝔰𝔱𝔯𝔦𝔠𝔱△ 🇬🇪🇺🇦🇺🇲🇬🇷

67,005 次观看 • 26 天前