Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A right should exist without imposing an obligation on anyone else, arising instead through natural cause, like the right to breathe. Yet GoZ has declared healthcare a right and gone further by stripping private hospitals of their property rights, compelling them to provide emergency care. After what GoZ did... show more

Tinashe

53,870 subscribers

11,155 views • 22 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

CNN on Vance remarks: So first of all, hospitals have been required for decades under a law signed by Republican president Ronald Reagan to treat undocumented immigrants and anyone else who shows up in the E.R. with an acute condition, regardless of their ability to pay, regardless of their legal status. This was not a Joe Biden decision. Secondly, the federal money for this emergency care goes to hospitals to help them cover the cost of the E.R. Visit. It is not comprehensive health care for undocumented people. Third, Jake, the trump law reduced this federal funding to hospitals. It did not eliminate it. And fourth, and I think this is the biggest point Democrats push to reverse this trump move and give the hospitals back level of reimbursement, would not give extra services or money to undocumented people. They would get the same emergency care Hospitals have been required for decades to give them. Hospitals would just get more help—the old level of help in covering the cost of that treatment.

CNN on Vance remarks: So first of all, hospitals have been required for decades under a law signed by Republican president Ronald Reagan to treat undocumented immigrants and anyone else who shows up in the E.R. with an acute condition, regardless of their ability to pay, regardless of their legal status. This was not a Joe Biden decision. Secondly, the federal money for this emergency care goes to hospitals to help them cover the cost of the E.R. Visit. It is not comprehensive health care for undocumented people. Third, Jake, the trump law reduced this federal funding to hospitals. It did not eliminate it. And fourth, and I think this is the biggest point Democrats push to reverse this trump move and give the hospitals back level of reimbursement, would not give extra services or money to undocumented people. They would get the same emergency care Hospitals have been required for decades to give them. Hospitals would just get more help—the old level of help in covering the cost of that treatment.

Acyn

667,120 views • 10 months ago

Ontario absolutely has the resources for world-class public health care. But health care in Ontario is anything but. I visited the Thessalon Hospital and heard from health care workers stretched to the breaking point: people getting sicker without family doctors, emergency rooms overwhelmed, staff burning out. These challenges are hitting northern and rural communities hardest—but they’re spreading across Ontario. When governments fail to invest in local capacity and download responsibility onto hospitals already stretched thin, patients pay the price. Doug Ford is accelerating the privatization of our health care by diverting billions to for-profit clinics. Funding private clinics diverts money from already stressed public hospitals. He’s paying private clinics more than double what hospitals get for the same surgeries—less value for every public dollar. Funding to for-profit clinics increased over 200% while public hospitals faced real cuts. He’s moving 50% of surgeries to private facilities. In eight years under Doug Ford, access to health care has become worse. Not better. And here’s what’s most important: Universal public health care is a Canadian value we cannot afford to lose. This past year reminded us what makes us Canadian—and what’s worth fighting for. The NDP brought public health care to this country and I will always fight to protect it. In the coming months, I’ll keep meeting with health care workers and bring their voices to Queen’s Park in the spring. With your support, we can win the next election and form an Ontario NDP government that delivers the world-class public health care system we all know is possible.

Ontario absolutely has the resources for world-class public health care. But health care in Ontario is anything but. I visited the Thessalon Hospital and heard from health care workers stretched to the breaking point: people getting sicker without family doctors, emergency rooms overwhelmed, staff burning out. These challenges are hitting northern and rural communities hardest—but they’re spreading across Ontario. When governments fail to invest in local capacity and download responsibility onto hospitals already stretched thin, patients pay the price. Doug Ford is accelerating the privatization of our health care by diverting billions to for-profit clinics. Funding private clinics diverts money from already stressed public hospitals. He’s paying private clinics more than double what hospitals get for the same surgeries—less value for every public dollar. Funding to for-profit clinics increased over 200% while public hospitals faced real cuts. He’s moving 50% of surgeries to private facilities. In eight years under Doug Ford, access to health care has become worse. Not better. And here’s what’s most important: Universal public health care is a Canadian value we cannot afford to lose. This past year reminded us what makes us Canadian—and what’s worth fighting for. The NDP brought public health care to this country and I will always fight to protect it. In the coming months, I’ll keep meeting with health care workers and bring their voices to Queen’s Park in the spring. With your support, we can win the next election and form an Ontario NDP government that delivers the world-class public health care system we all know is possible.

Marit Stiles

30,729 views • 7 months ago

EXPOSED 🚨 Democrat party has a new diabolical scheme. Using lawfare & mafia tactics to bring about their COMMUNIST agenda. Led by Elizabeth Warren, the Dems are now threatening private investors that fund private hospitals with prosecution & imprisonment up to 10 years in an effort to deter investors from investing for fear of being buried in legal trouble. When investors dry up, private hospitals will be forced to shut down. Then the govt. will swoop in to create govt. run hospitals.

EXPOSED 🚨 Democrat party has a new diabolical scheme. Using lawfare & mafia tactics to bring about their COMMUNIST agenda. Led by Elizabeth Warren, the Dems are now threatening private investors that fund private hospitals with prosecution & imprisonment up to 10 years in an effort to deter investors from investing for fear of being buried in legal trouble. When investors dry up, private hospitals will be forced to shut down. Then the govt. will swoop in to create govt. run hospitals.

Melissa Tate

13,671 views • 1 month ago

#WATCH | Hisar: The Haryana unit of the Indian Medical Association (IMA) has written to the state government regarding the withdrawal of services by Ayushman empanelled hospitals from August 7, 2025, due to non-payment of dues. Former Haryana IMA President Dr Ajay Mahajan says, " For the last two years, we have been repeatedly facing the problem that our payments get stopped. Due to this, the hospitals also lack the financial resources to make their payments. The hospitals have to make immediate payments to their doctors, their staff, their vendors, but the government is making these payments after three months, four months, six months and even then, it makes unwanted deductions. Due to this, a huge financial burden has fallen on the hospitals. Due to this, the hospitals have decided to request the government to pay all the dues till 15th July by 7th August, otherwise we will not be able to provide further services... Now, after giving our notice, the government says that we have sanctioned Rs 310 crores, but that sanctioning and getting the money will take time. We have about 650 to 700 hospitals, which are private sector hospitals, that were providing their services to the government under Ayushman Bharat. Now, because the debt burden on them has increased, they are unable to provide their services further. We have requested the government that all the payments till 15th July should be made by the 7th so that the hospital can run smoothly..."

#WATCH | Hisar: The Haryana unit of the Indian Medical Association (IMA) has written to the state government regarding the withdrawal of services by Ayushman empanelled hospitals from August 7, 2025, due to non-payment of dues. Former Haryana IMA President Dr Ajay Mahajan says, " For the last two years, we have been repeatedly facing the problem that our payments get stopped. Due to this, the hospitals also lack the financial resources to make their payments. The hospitals have to make immediate payments to their doctors, their staff, their vendors, but the government is making these payments after three months, four months, six months and even then, it makes unwanted deductions. Due to this, a huge financial burden has fallen on the hospitals. Due to this, the hospitals have decided to request the government to pay all the dues till 15th July by 7th August, otherwise we will not be able to provide further services... Now, after giving our notice, the government says that we have sanctioned Rs 310 crores, but that sanctioning and getting the money will take time. We have about 650 to 700 hospitals, which are private sector hospitals, that were providing their services to the government under Ayushman Bharat. Now, because the debt burden on them has increased, they are unable to provide their services further. We have requested the government that all the payments till 15th July should be made by the 7th so that the hospital can run smoothly..."

ANI

10,453 views • 1 year ago

Is Econet going out of its way to keep competition out of Zimbabwe so that it can enjoy super normal profits? Ranga Makwata is very emphatic, if MTN or any other international company was in Zim they would’ve left the country a long time ago. Many international investors and brands have left the country because of the unsustainable operating environment, the banking sector being one such market. (Telecel lost its international partner and GOZ claimed it could run it) If Starlink comes to Zimbabwe, it will leave on its own, given the ZWL tariffs and price controls. Econet has just had a rights issue to pay off its USD debt. Shareholders had to shore up money despite US$1bn that Econet have invested in the country and didn’t get a return. What is incredibly sad is that on life and death matters, Zimbabweans can choose to either use public or private hospitals. Private health care has full discretion on pricing but ICT doesn’t argues Rufaro . How crazy is that? GOZ owns Netone, Telecel, Telone which if data was a public good for the least and most vulnerable of our society then GOZ entities should happily subsidize the citizens. After all they didn’t even pay licence fees. Why is GoZ targeting Econet? What are we missing? The Regulator has failed. A private company like any other sector must not be subjected to price controls and abuse. The regulator has new swanky offices while the industry is slowly dying. Did they force suppliers to contract at prices sub inflation? Why is a local investor, certainly the largest and Zimbabwe’s best entrepreneur subjected to such malice? Econet is subsidizing data for Zimbabweans. For how long can they do that? Strive Masiyiwa is now a billionaire in spite of Zimbabwe. How long will his patience last? Are we going to be happy when Econet becomes another Telecel?

Is Econet going out of its way to keep competition out of Zimbabwe so that it can enjoy super normal profits? Ranga Makwata is very emphatic, if MTN or any other international company was in Zim they would’ve left the country a long time ago. Many international investors and brands have left the country because of the unsustainable operating environment, the banking sector being one such market. (Telecel lost its international partner and GOZ claimed it could run it) If Starlink comes to Zimbabwe, it will leave on its own, given the ZWL tariffs and price controls. Econet has just had a rights issue to pay off its USD debt. Shareholders had to shore up money despite US$1bn that Econet have invested in the country and didn’t get a return. What is incredibly sad is that on life and death matters, Zimbabweans can choose to either use public or private hospitals. Private health care has full discretion on pricing but ICT doesn’t argues Rufaro . How crazy is that? GOZ owns Netone, Telecel, Telone which if data was a public good for the least and most vulnerable of our society then GOZ entities should happily subsidize the citizens. After all they didn’t even pay licence fees. Why is GoZ targeting Econet? What are we missing? The Regulator has failed. A private company like any other sector must not be subjected to price controls and abuse. The regulator has new swanky offices while the industry is slowly dying. Did they force suppliers to contract at prices sub inflation? Why is a local investor, certainly the largest and Zimbabwe’s best entrepreneur subjected to such malice? Econet is subsidizing data for Zimbabweans. For how long can they do that? Strive Masiyiwa is now a billionaire in spite of Zimbabwe. How long will his patience last? Are we going to be happy when Econet becomes another Telecel?

Tinashe

56,685 views • 2 years ago

You think you have a right to a second opinion—but in most hospitals, that "right" is strictly limited to their own staff. It’s time for legislation that ensures patients can consult with the doctors they trust, regardless of hospital "privileges." As long as a physician's license is in good standing, their expertise should be available to you when you need it most. What do you think? Should you have the right to a second opinion from any licensed doctor?

You think you have a right to a second opinion—but in most hospitals, that "right" is strictly limited to their own staff. It’s time for legislation that ensures patients can consult with the doctors they trust, regardless of hospital "privileges." As long as a physician's license is in good standing, their expertise should be available to you when you need it most. What do you think? Should you have the right to a second opinion from any licensed doctor?

Mary Talley Bowden MD

23,986 views • 4 months ago

In the richest country on the face of the earth, I believe that health care is a human right. I spoke on the House floor about how expiring ACA tax credit will cause 189,000 Central Floridians to see their healthcare premiums skyrocket and how I’ll keep fighting to protect your care.

In the richest country on the face of the earth, I believe that health care is a human right. I spoke on the House floor about how expiring ACA tax credit will cause 189,000 Central Floridians to see their healthcare premiums skyrocket and how I’ll keep fighting to protect your care.

Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost

32,851 views • 8 months ago

This infamous portion reads, “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” This is the part that describes both the right and the duty of the people to overthrow or replace a government that has become tyrannical or destructive to the ends of securing life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (especially when a pattern of abuses shows intent toward absolute despotism). I ask you, out of sheer consensus, are we there yet?

This infamous portion reads, “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” This is the part that describes both the right and the duty of the people to overthrow or replace a government that has become tyrannical or destructive to the ends of securing life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (especially when a pattern of abuses shows intent toward absolute despotism). I ask you, out of sheer consensus, are we there yet?

🚫👁️Drinks on Saturday🇺🇸

27,454 views • 4 months ago

Dr. Mary Talley Bowden calls for investigation of “nonprofit” hospitals 👇 She questions how hospitals labeled nonprofit can justify executive salaries topping $6 million a year while paying no property taxes — especially in Texas, where rising property taxes are forcing families out of their homes. Bowden points to Houston, home to the largest medical center in the world, where most hospitals are nonprofit, tax-exempt, and yet generate billions in revenue. She notes that 18 of the top 20 nonprofits in Texas are hospitals. One example: Houston Methodist Hospital, the top nonprofit in the state by income, whose CEO reportedly earns over $6 million annually. Her conclusion: it’s time for serious investigations and full audits of nonprofit hospitals’ finances. Mary Talley Bowden MD

Dr. Mary Talley Bowden calls for investigation of “nonprofit” hospitals 👇 She questions how hospitals labeled nonprofit can justify executive salaries topping $6 million a year while paying no property taxes — especially in Texas, where rising property taxes are forcing families out of their homes. Bowden points to Houston, home to the largest medical center in the world, where most hospitals are nonprofit, tax-exempt, and yet generate billions in revenue. She notes that 18 of the top 20 nonprofits in Texas are hospitals. One example: Houston Methodist Hospital, the top nonprofit in the state by income, whose CEO reportedly earns over $6 million annually. Her conclusion: it’s time for serious investigations and full audits of nonprofit hospitals’ finances. Mary Talley Bowden MD

WorldviewTube

23,396 views • 5 months ago

Colin Allred: "In Texas, we have the highest uninsured rate in the country. When you talk about more than a million Texans losing their healthcare on top of what we already have, that will lead to rural hospitals closing and our healthcare crisis getting even worse."

Colin Allred: "In Texas, we have the highest uninsured rate in the country. When you talk about more than a million Texans losing their healthcare on top of what we already have, that will lead to rural hospitals closing and our healthcare crisis getting even worse."

Home of the Brave

23,925 views • 10 months ago

Private Equity Firms have found a new target in America, Hospitals 460+ American hospitals are now owned by private equity firms Just in the last few years, they’ve already managed to load an estimated 50 hospitals up with debt, forcing their bankruptcies and closures One private equity firm bought a hospital in Pennsylvania, “ Just two years after buying Crozier Health, Prospect took out a $1.1 billion loan and then sent nearly half of it straight to their investors while Crozier continued to suffer. It's fundamentally extractive, even among private equity industry folks. It's a controversial way to generate a return on an investment because it adds absolutely no value to the company in question” Private equity firms often use leveraged buyouts, loading acquired hospitals with debt to finance purchases. This debt, combined with strategies like sale-leaseback deals (selling hospital real estate and leasing it back to the hospital at high rents), can strain hospital finances Here’s another example of that: Steward Health Care, previously owned by Cerberus Capital Management, sold its real estate to Medical Properties Trust (MPT), incurring $350–400 million in annual rent, contributing to its 2024 bankruptcy - The hospitals own the land - Private equity buys the land and sells it to their own company - They then leases the land back to the hospital at hundreds of millions of dollars per month - They take out massive loans and pay their private equity executives hundreds of millions of dollars each The hospital goes bankrupt and closes Last month, a woman arrived at a Pennsylvania hospital with her barely breathing baby, only to discover the hospital had closed. Why? The hospital’s owner diverted millions to private equity investors instead of investing in healthcare. Now, patients and workers are paying the price.

Private Equity Firms have found a new target in America, Hospitals 460+ American hospitals are now owned by private equity firms Just in the last few years, they’ve already managed to load an estimated 50 hospitals up with debt, forcing their bankruptcies and closures One private equity firm bought a hospital in Pennsylvania, “ Just two years after buying Crozier Health, Prospect took out a $1.1 billion loan and then sent nearly half of it straight to their investors while Crozier continued to suffer. It's fundamentally extractive, even among private equity industry folks. It's a controversial way to generate a return on an investment because it adds absolutely no value to the company in question” Private equity firms often use leveraged buyouts, loading acquired hospitals with debt to finance purchases. This debt, combined with strategies like sale-leaseback deals (selling hospital real estate and leasing it back to the hospital at high rents), can strain hospital finances Here’s another example of that: Steward Health Care, previously owned by Cerberus Capital Management, sold its real estate to Medical Properties Trust (MPT), incurring $350–400 million in annual rent, contributing to its 2024 bankruptcy - The hospitals own the land - Private equity buys the land and sells it to their own company - They then leases the land back to the hospital at hundreds of millions of dollars per month - They take out massive loans and pay their private equity executives hundreds of millions of dollars each The hospital goes bankrupt and closes Last month, a woman arrived at a Pennsylvania hospital with her barely breathing baby, only to discover the hospital had closed. Why? The hospital’s owner diverted millions to private equity investors instead of investing in healthcare. Now, patients and workers are paying the price.

Wall Street Apes

247,836 views • 1 year ago

Brainless is he who doesn’t know the difference between a private and public hospital. Brainless is he who doesn’t know that a “patron” is an honorary position and not a shareholding or decision making position that can allow one to usurp the powers of the board. Brainless is he who has been given the powers by Kenyans to ensure realization of affordable quality healthcare for each Kenyan under Art .43 COK and has instead seen collapse of all referral hospitals like KNH, MTRH and is now busy trying to hijack private hospitals like Nairobi. Brainless is he who has numerous unfulfilled promises in western Kenya and other regions and while expected to bring tangible development during his visit has delivered tonnes of insults

Brainless is he who doesn’t know the difference between a private and public hospital. Brainless is he who doesn’t know that a “patron” is an honorary position and not a shareholding or decision making position that can allow one to usurp the powers of the board. Brainless is he who has been given the powers by Kenyans to ensure realization of affordable quality healthcare for each Kenyan under Art .43 COK and has instead seen collapse of all referral hospitals like KNH, MTRH and is now busy trying to hijack private hospitals like Nairobi. Brainless is he who has numerous unfulfilled promises in western Kenya and other regions and while expected to bring tangible development during his visit has delivered tonnes of insults

Eugene L. Wamalwa

58,888 views • 4 months ago

Katy Faust believes the legalization of same-sex marriage and the rise of same-sex parenting has had detrimental consequences for children. She explains why she views the issue not through hate, but as a conflict between adult desires and children’s natural rights. “You don’t have a right to marry somebody else if it means that a child loses their fundamental, natural, God-given, self-evident right to be known and loved by both their mother and father.” “The pseudo-adult rights of gay marriage have always come at the expense of children’s fundamental natural right to be known and loved by their mom and dad.” “These adult rights always genuinely infringe on child rights.” “In the United States, over the last 11 years since Obergefell, we have seen the systematic stripping of children’s right to the two people responsible for their existence.” “We see the scrubbing of gendered terms, mother and father, from our parentage statutes.” “We see a direct connection between gay marriage and child commodification in the world of Big Fertility and the reproductive technology market.” “Just because you really want something, it doesn’t make it a natural right.” Katy Faust Them Before Us

Katy Faust believes the legalization of same-sex marriage and the rise of same-sex parenting has had detrimental consequences for children. She explains why she views the issue not through hate, but as a conflict between adult desires and children’s natural rights. “You don’t have a right to marry somebody else if it means that a child loses their fundamental, natural, God-given, self-evident right to be known and loved by both their mother and father.” “The pseudo-adult rights of gay marriage have always come at the expense of children’s fundamental natural right to be known and loved by their mom and dad.” “These adult rights always genuinely infringe on child rights.” “In the United States, over the last 11 years since Obergefell, we have seen the systematic stripping of children’s right to the two people responsible for their existence.” “We see the scrubbing of gendered terms, mother and father, from our parentage statutes.” “We see a direct connection between gay marriage and child commodification in the world of Big Fertility and the reproductive technology market.” “Just because you really want something, it doesn’t make it a natural right.” Katy Faust Them Before Us

Jan Jekielek

24,860 views • 1 day ago

What Elon Musk says here is wrong. The limiting factor for an economy to turn labor into goods is the strength of the promise known as private property. By offering a credible promise that the fruits of their labor will not be stolen, strong private property incentivizes people to be productive. Printing money steals the fruits of peoples’ labor, thereby weakening the promise of private property. As private property is weakened through money printing, people are more incentivized to steal rather than produce. After all, if the promise of legal ownership is being broken, then why work at all when you can instead get in on the take (through bailouts, subsidies, welfare, etc)? When the promise of private property is strong, capital is accumulated rather than consumed, thereby intensifying productivity. #Bitcoin is money that is extremely difficult to steal and impossible to print. Therefore, Bitcoin is the perfection of private property and an intensification of the productive output of people worldwide.

What Elon Musk says here is wrong. The limiting factor for an economy to turn labor into goods is the strength of the promise known as private property. By offering a credible promise that the fruits of their labor will not be stolen, strong private property incentivizes people to be productive. Printing money steals the fruits of peoples’ labor, thereby weakening the promise of private property. As private property is weakened through money printing, people are more incentivized to steal rather than produce. After all, if the promise of legal ownership is being broken, then why work at all when you can instead get in on the take (through bailouts, subsidies, welfare, etc)? When the promise of private property is strong, capital is accumulated rather than consumed, thereby intensifying productivity. #Bitcoin is money that is extremely difficult to steal and impossible to print. Therefore, Bitcoin is the perfection of private property and an intensification of the productive output of people worldwide.

Robert ₿reedlove

46,055 views • 1 year ago

Why Is Healthcare Pricing Still a Secret? The government created two major rules in the early 2020s to help patients understand the actual cost of healthcare: 1️⃣ Transparency in Coverage Rule – Requires insurance companies to disclose negotiated rates. 2️⃣ Hospital Price Transparency Rule – Requires hospitals to publish their prices. The goal? To create a real marketplace where patients and providers could compare costs and make informed decisions. But here’s the problem: hospitals and insurers aren’t really complying. Instead of clear, easy-to-read pricing, they’ve published huge, unreadable data files called “machine-readable files.” These files are so big that even I can’t download them on my computer. 💰 Why would they do this? Because keeping prices a secret benefits them. If you don’t know what something costs until after treatment, you can’t shop around for better, more affordable care. Imagine going to a restaurant where there’s no menu with prices, and they just hand you the bill at the end. That’s how healthcare works right now. The government knows we need price transparency. But hospitals and insurers are making it as difficult as possible—because when you can’t see the cost, they control the system. If they were truly offering the best care, they wouldn’t need to hide their prices. But I want to know what you think? Should hospitals and insurers be required to provide clear, upfront pricing? Drop your thoughts below.

Why Is Healthcare Pricing Still a Secret? The government created two major rules in the early 2020s to help patients understand the actual cost of healthcare: 1️⃣ Transparency in Coverage Rule – Requires insurance companies to disclose negotiated rates. 2️⃣ Hospital Price Transparency Rule – Requires hospitals to publish their prices. The goal? To create a real marketplace where patients and providers could compare costs and make informed decisions. But here’s the problem: hospitals and insurers aren’t really complying. Instead of clear, easy-to-read pricing, they’ve published huge, unreadable data files called “machine-readable files.” These files are so big that even I can’t download them on my computer. 💰 Why would they do this? Because keeping prices a secret benefits them. If you don’t know what something costs until after treatment, you can’t shop around for better, more affordable care. Imagine going to a restaurant where there’s no menu with prices, and they just hand you the bill at the end. That’s how healthcare works right now. The government knows we need price transparency. But hospitals and insurers are making it as difficult as possible—because when you can’t see the cost, they control the system. If they were truly offering the best care, they wouldn’t need to hide their prices. But I want to know what you think? Should hospitals and insurers be required to provide clear, upfront pricing? Drop your thoughts below.

Elisabeth Potter MD

22,816 views • 1 year ago

There’s lots written about Palantir work with the #NHS but if you want to understand what it’s actually about, look no further than this animation. The word federated might sound like jargon, but it’s the key - it means every NHS hospital has its own instance of #palantir software. Each individual hospital is in complete control - the hospital decides how the software is used and how to manage the information the hospital holds. #NHS hospitals use Palantir to bring together information from their many different IT systems, so their staff can make better informed decisions about patient care. Because they are using the same kind of software, it’s also secure and simple for them to share information with other hospitals. That might be to get an individual patient treated sooner. Or it might be to support preventative care by enabling an Integrated Care Board to better understand of health trends across a local area. However #NHS hospitals choose to use and share this information, privacy and security are protected by technology honed over the 20 years Palantir has spent supporting many of the world’s most critical organisations to manage their most sensitive data. $PLTR #PLTR

There’s lots written about Palantir work with the #NHS but if you want to understand what it’s actually about, look no further than this animation. The word federated might sound like jargon, but it’s the key - it means every NHS hospital has its own instance of #palantir software. Each individual hospital is in complete control - the hospital decides how the software is used and how to manage the information the hospital holds. #NHS hospitals use Palantir to bring together information from their many different IT systems, so their staff can make better informed decisions about patient care. Because they are using the same kind of software, it’s also secure and simple for them to share information with other hospitals. That might be to get an individual patient treated sooner. Or it might be to support preventative care by enabling an Integrated Care Board to better understand of health trends across a local area. However #NHS hospitals choose to use and share this information, privacy and security are protected by technology honed over the 20 years Palantir has spent supporting many of the world’s most critical organisations to manage their most sensitive data. $PLTR #PLTR

Louis Mosley

386,766 views • 1 year ago

ACA subsidies are expiring. Democrats solution? Universal healthcare... Rho Khanna: "Private health insurance is what's bankrupting America. It was happening before the Affordable Care Act. The ACA helped slow the growth of private insurance. But of course it's not the solution. The solution, as everyone knows, is Medicare for all. People should have national health insurance, healthcare a human right. You should not be subject to the private insurance companies that have 18% administrative costs that are making billions of dollars of profits." When will Dems admit that their healthcare plan doesn't work??

ACA subsidies are expiring. Democrats solution? Universal healthcare... Rho Khanna: "Private health insurance is what's bankrupting America. It was happening before the Affordable Care Act. The ACA helped slow the growth of private insurance. But of course it's not the solution. The solution, as everyone knows, is Medicare for all. People should have national health insurance, healthcare a human right. You should not be subject to the private insurance companies that have 18% administrative costs that are making billions of dollars of profits." When will Dems admit that their healthcare plan doesn't work??

DeVory Darkins

34,086 views • 7 months ago

When will Karen’s learn that anyone has a right to film in public? Regardless if you like it or not. You do not have to give your permission. I often wonder how many of these Karen’s have dash cams on their cars. Or cameras on their homes. How do they not understand if those are legal then so is filming from the sidewalk as long as you don’t step onto private party? Know your rights.

When will Karen’s learn that anyone has a right to film in public? Regardless if you like it or not. You do not have to give your permission. I often wonder how many of these Karen’s have dash cams on their cars. Or cameras on their homes. How do they not understand if those are legal then so is filming from the sidewalk as long as you don’t step onto private party? Know your rights.

🌸𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓻𝓮𝔂🌸

34,128 views • 3 months ago

1776 Christmas Warrior Nobody knew …….. “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.””

1776 Christmas Warrior Nobody knew …….. “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.””

Fletch17

15,861 views • 7 months ago

State-of-the-Art Control Room at Swasthya Bhawan Taking a decisive step toward a transparent and broker-free healthcare system in West Bengal, today a High-Tech Control Room has been inaugurated at the Swasthya Bhawan. This facility will serve as the central hub for monitoring all Government Hospitals across the State in real-time. Our mission is clear: to eliminate the menace of the "Dalal Raj" that has plagued our Hospitals for too long. Through advanced surveillance and analytical monitoring, we will now track unusual activities and patterns within hospital premises. If individuals are found loitering without purpose or cause, they will be promptly identified and dealt with according to the law. To further ensure safety & security of Healthcare Professionals & Patients and to streamline Hospital Operations, we are introducing a new Badge System, so that People can clearly be identified and segregated as per their their purpose in the vicinity. By segregating the crowd, we will easily distinguish those who have no business being on Hospital premises. I have personally visited several Hospitals and witnessed the dedicated service of our Doctors, Nurses and Health Workers. They deserve a safe, secure and professional environment. We are committed to provide that. This is a significant shift toward a safer, technology-driven and patient-centric Healthcare system for the people of West Bengal.

State-of-the-Art Control Room at Swasthya Bhawan Taking a decisive step toward a transparent and broker-free healthcare system in West Bengal, today a High-Tech Control Room has been inaugurated at the Swasthya Bhawan. This facility will serve as the central hub for monitoring all Government Hospitals across the State in real-time. Our mission is clear: to eliminate the menace of the "Dalal Raj" that has plagued our Hospitals for too long. Through advanced surveillance and analytical monitoring, we will now track unusual activities and patterns within hospital premises. If individuals are found loitering without purpose or cause, they will be promptly identified and dealt with according to the law. To further ensure safety & security of Healthcare Professionals & Patients and to streamline Hospital Operations, we are introducing a new Badge System, so that People can clearly be identified and segregated as per their their purpose in the vicinity. By segregating the crowd, we will easily distinguish those who have no business being on Hospital premises. I have personally visited several Hospitals and witnessed the dedicated service of our Doctors, Nurses and Health Workers. They deserve a safe, secure and professional environment. We are committed to provide that. This is a significant shift toward a safer, technology-driven and patient-centric Healthcare system for the people of West Bengal.

Suvendu Adhikari

55,771 views • 24 days ago