Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚪 A routine debt collection. A desperate secret. One unexpected visitor. 💸 Billy thought it would be just another overdue payment. Instead, he finds himself trapped inside a house where one wrong move could expose everything. With every second, the tension builds—and the front door isn't the only thing... show more

VIP4K

28,370 subscribers

19,223 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Today’s visit was to a large-scale RUO peptide vendor ( identity asked to be kept a secret) and I think most people would agree it looks like a peptide sweet shop. Each bag contains 1,000 vials. Every double-door freezer holds 50,000 vials, and there are 11 of those freezers. Guess how many vials are in there? 👀 That’s just the long-term storage inventory. Next door is the fulfilment area, where even more vials are stored in boxes, ready to be picked, packed, and shipped. It’s one thing to hear about operations at this scale. It’s another to stand in front of it.

Today’s visit was to a large-scale RUO peptide vendor ( identity asked to be kept a secret) and I think most people would agree it looks like a peptide sweet shop. Each bag contains 1,000 vials. Every double-door freezer holds 50,000 vials, and there are 11 of those freezers. Guess how many vials are in there? 👀 That’s just the long-term storage inventory. Next door is the fulfilment area, where even more vials are stored in boxes, ready to be picked, packed, and shipped. It’s one thing to hear about operations at this scale. It’s another to stand in front of it.

Krysia

67,799 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

ONE OF THE MINDS BEHIND JAVA GAVE A LECTURE WHERE HE BANNED HIMSELF FROM USING ANY BIG WORD UNTIL HE DEFINED IT FIRST AND IN DOING SO QUIETLY EXPLAINED HOW EVERY GREAT SYSTEM GETS BUILT A talk from Guy Steele -- co-author of the Java spec and a designer of Scheme -- where the form of the talk is the lesson. -> The moment you catch what he's doing, it rewires you. He starts with only the smallest words, then builds every larger idea live, in front of you, from the pieces he already gave you. The talk grows its own vocabulary as it goes. That's the whole secret of language and system design he's smuggling in: you don't ship something huge and finished. You ship a small core and the means to grow it. Miss that and you spend your career fighting your own tools. Memorizing a language was never the skill -> understanding how a good one is meant to grow is. And as AI starts generating the primitives you build on, knowing what makes a foundation extensible instead of brittle is the entire game. Twenty-five years on, language designers still point to this talk as the cleanest demonstration of the idea ever performed. Bookmark it & Watch how he builds the whole thing from nothing ↓

ONE OF THE MINDS BEHIND JAVA GAVE A LECTURE WHERE HE BANNED HIMSELF FROM USING ANY BIG WORD UNTIL HE DEFINED IT FIRST AND IN DOING SO QUIETLY EXPLAINED HOW EVERY GREAT SYSTEM GETS BUILT A talk from Guy Steele -- co-author of the Java spec and a designer of Scheme -- where the form of the talk is the lesson. -> The moment you catch what he's doing, it rewires you. He starts with only the smallest words, then builds every larger idea live, in front of you, from the pieces he already gave you. The talk grows its own vocabulary as it goes. That's the whole secret of language and system design he's smuggling in: you don't ship something huge and finished. You ship a small core and the means to grow it. Miss that and you spend your career fighting your own tools. Memorizing a language was never the skill -> understanding how a good one is meant to grow is. And as AI starts generating the primitives you build on, knowing what makes a foundation extensible instead of brittle is the entire game. Twenty-five years on, language designers still point to this talk as the cleanest demonstration of the idea ever performed. Bookmark it & Watch how he builds the whole thing from nothing ↓

slash1s

358,660 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Aigents! 🤖 Have you ever imagined a world where technology could not only see, but also understand and advise you? 🤔 Imagine playing a game of chess, strategizing each move, and then, with the help of AigentX, discovering the next winning move. This is not just a possibility anymore, it's reality! 🚀 Introducing AigentX's Image Processing feature! This isn't just about analysing and processing images; it's about bringing them to life with insights and guidance that we once thought could never become a reality and merely a figment of our imagination! 🤯 Picture this: You're deeply engrossed in a chess match, contemplating your next move. You snap a picture of the board and send it to AigentX. In moments, you're not just seeing the pieces – you're understanding the potential for your next move! 📸 AigentX doesn't just view the image; it interprets it, offering you useful insights and it isn't just chess! This feature can be taken straight to the real world with features like chart analysis and more! 📈 But that's just the beginning. AigentX is ready to transform how you interact with any image. From art analysis to real-world problem-solving, the possibilities are endless 📈 Check out our latest video below to see AigentX in action. This is more than an update; it's a leap into a future where your interaction with images is redefined 📻 Test out AigentX for yourself and witness how it's changing the game, one image at a time. Stay tuned for more – the journey with AigentX has just begun!

Aigents! 🤖 Have you ever imagined a world where technology could not only see, but also understand and advise you? 🤔 Imagine playing a game of chess, strategizing each move, and then, with the help of AigentX, discovering the next winning move. This is not just a possibility anymore, it's reality! 🚀 Introducing AigentX's Image Processing feature! This isn't just about analysing and processing images; it's about bringing them to life with insights and guidance that we once thought could never become a reality and merely a figment of our imagination! 🤯 Picture this: You're deeply engrossed in a chess match, contemplating your next move. You snap a picture of the board and send it to AigentX. In moments, you're not just seeing the pieces – you're understanding the potential for your next move! 📸 AigentX doesn't just view the image; it interprets it, offering you useful insights and it isn't just chess! This feature can be taken straight to the real world with features like chart analysis and more! 📈 But that's just the beginning. AigentX is ready to transform how you interact with any image. From art analysis to real-world problem-solving, the possibilities are endless 📈 Check out our latest video below to see AigentX in action. This is more than an update; it's a leap into a future where your interaction with images is redefined 📻 Test out AigentX for yourself and witness how it's changing the game, one image at a time. Stay tuned for more – the journey with AigentX has just begun!

AGIX | $AGX

22,621 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

We, the Dogei community, are excited to announce the launch of our official roadmap, now live on our website! To celebrate, we’ll be giving away a Tesla worth $30,000 to one lucky person when we reach a $10 million market cap! Along with our roadmap, you can also check out our whitepaper, which explains our vision and introduces our doxxed team. Our roadmap is unique, just like everything about Dogei. It includes 13 milestones, each tied to a market cap goal, showing our progress toward building the Dogei Club. Many of these milestones feature exciting community giveaways during our live shows to celebrate! Some milestones are hidden and will only be revealed as we grow together. We’re excited about what’s ahead and hope you are too. This is just the beginning, stay tuned for more! – Dogei Core Team $DOGEI #GIVEAWAY #DOGEICLUB #TESLA

We, the Dogei community, are excited to announce the launch of our official roadmap, now live on our website! To celebrate, we’ll be giving away a Tesla worth $30,000 to one lucky person when we reach a $10 million market cap! Along with our roadmap, you can also check out our whitepaper, which explains our vision and introduces our doxxed team. Our roadmap is unique, just like everything about Dogei. It includes 13 milestones, each tied to a market cap goal, showing our progress toward building the Dogei Club. Many of these milestones feature exciting community giveaways during our live shows to celebrate! Some milestones are hidden and will only be revealed as we grow together. We’re excited about what’s ahead and hope you are too. This is just the beginning, stay tuned for more! – Dogei Core Team $DOGEI #GIVEAWAY #DOGEICLUB #TESLA

Dogei

24,395 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Jensen Huang just told the story of how the AI revolution started with one customer, one box, and a second-floor room nobody thought twice about. Nobody on Earth wanted it. Huang: “When I announced this thing, nobody in the world wanted it. I had no purchase orders. Not one.” Nvidia had spent billions building the DGX-1. The first AI supercomputer purpose-built for deep learning. $300,000 per unit. The entire technology industry looked at it and passed. Every hyperscaler. Every research lab. Every Fortune 500 with a machine learning team. Not one purchase order. Then Elon Musk found Huang at a fireside chat in 2015. Huang: “He goes, ‘You know what? I have a company that could really use this.’” His first customer. His only customer. Then Musk finished the sentence. Huang: “He goes, ‘It’s a non-profit company.’ And all the blood drained out of my face.” Billions in R&D. A $300,000 machine. And the one person on Earth who wanted it could not pay for it. Huang built it anyway. Huang: “I boxed one up. I drove it up to San Francisco and I delivered it to Elon in 2016.” Not shipped. Not handed off to a freight company. The CEO of Nvidia personally boxed the first AI supercomputer and drove it to San Francisco himself. That is not a delivery. That is a bet. Huang: “I walked up to the second floor where they were all kind of in a room. That place turned out to have been OpenAI.” Pieter Abbeel was there. Ilya Sutskever was there. A handful of researchers, one supercomputer, and a room nobody outside that building could have named. No campus. No valuation. No infrastructure. Just raw talent and one machine the rest of the world had already rejected. Huang: “Just a bunch of people in a room.” That room built ChatGPT. That room triggered a $200 billion industry. That room forced every government on Earth to rethink national security. It started because one founder saw what the entire market refused to see, and one CEO drove the weapon there himself. The trillion-dollar AI industry did not begin in a boardroom. It began with a box in the back of a car, a non-profit that could not afford it, and a bet that every serious person in technology thought was insane. The market was unanimous. The market was wrong.

Jensen Huang just told the story of how the AI revolution started with one customer, one box, and a second-floor room nobody thought twice about. Nobody on Earth wanted it. Huang: “When I announced this thing, nobody in the world wanted it. I had no purchase orders. Not one.” Nvidia had spent billions building the DGX-1. The first AI supercomputer purpose-built for deep learning. $300,000 per unit. The entire technology industry looked at it and passed. Every hyperscaler. Every research lab. Every Fortune 500 with a machine learning team. Not one purchase order. Then Elon Musk found Huang at a fireside chat in 2015. Huang: “He goes, ‘You know what? I have a company that could really use this.’” His first customer. His only customer. Then Musk finished the sentence. Huang: “He goes, ‘It’s a non-profit company.’ And all the blood drained out of my face.” Billions in R&D. A $300,000 machine. And the one person on Earth who wanted it could not pay for it. Huang built it anyway. Huang: “I boxed one up. I drove it up to San Francisco and I delivered it to Elon in 2016.” Not shipped. Not handed off to a freight company. The CEO of Nvidia personally boxed the first AI supercomputer and drove it to San Francisco himself. That is not a delivery. That is a bet. Huang: “I walked up to the second floor where they were all kind of in a room. That place turned out to have been OpenAI.” Pieter Abbeel was there. Ilya Sutskever was there. A handful of researchers, one supercomputer, and a room nobody outside that building could have named. No campus. No valuation. No infrastructure. Just raw talent and one machine the rest of the world had already rejected. Huang: “Just a bunch of people in a room.” That room built ChatGPT. That room triggered a $200 billion industry. That room forced every government on Earth to rethink national security. It started because one founder saw what the entire market refused to see, and one CEO drove the weapon there himself. The trillion-dollar AI industry did not begin in a boardroom. It began with a box in the back of a car, a non-profit that could not afford it, and a bet that every serious person in technology thought was insane. The market was unanimous. The market was wrong.

Dustin

25,119 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Exactly One Year Ago, Everything Changed. On November 26, 2023, I shared one of the biggest decisions of my life with you: acquiring the Punks on Bitcoin collection. It wasn’t just about a collection—it was about stepping into history, about believing in a future where Bitcoin isn’t just the world’s most powerful store of value, but its ultimate canvas for culture and innovation. When I look back, I’m reminded of that first piece: the hoodie alien. It wasn’t just an Inscription ; it was a symbol of what could be—a reminder that Bitcoin is more than blocks and nodes; it’s a story we’re writing together. Today, I’m not here to reflect on the past—I’m here to share where we’re going next. Because this past year wasn’t just about preserving what Punks on Bitcoin is. It was about reimagining what it could become. To mark this anniversary, we’re unveiling two milestones: 1️⃣ Our New Website – A reflection of our identity and vision. More than just a homepage, it’s a statement: sleek, elegant, and true to the ethos of Punks on Bitcoin. It’s where the past meets the future. 2️⃣ Our Virtual Showroom – This is where the experience becomes tangible. Immerse yourself in the world of Punks, interact with the art, and feel what it means to be part of this movement. In addition to these milestones, last October marked another significant moment in our journey. We organized our first 10k Ordinals Night during BTC Amsterdam—a night dedicated to celebrating this movement and its community. What began as a single evening holds the promise of becoming a recurring series, a tradition that brings us together to shape the future of Ordinals. But let’s be clear: these aren’t the endpoints. They’re just the beginning. Every decision we’ve made has been driven by one mission: to position Punks on Bitcoin among the most iconic and impactful projects in the Ordinals ecosystem. This journey is far from over. And if you’re here, reading this, you’re part of it too.

Exactly One Year Ago, Everything Changed. On November 26, 2023, I shared one of the biggest decisions of my life with you: acquiring the Punks on Bitcoin collection. It wasn’t just about a collection—it was about stepping into history, about believing in a future where Bitcoin isn’t just the world’s most powerful store of value, but its ultimate canvas for culture and innovation. When I look back, I’m reminded of that first piece: the hoodie alien. It wasn’t just an Inscription ; it was a symbol of what could be—a reminder that Bitcoin is more than blocks and nodes; it’s a story we’re writing together. Today, I’m not here to reflect on the past—I’m here to share where we’re going next. Because this past year wasn’t just about preserving what Punks on Bitcoin is. It was about reimagining what it could become. To mark this anniversary, we’re unveiling two milestones: 1️⃣ Our New Website – A reflection of our identity and vision. More than just a homepage, it’s a statement: sleek, elegant, and true to the ethos of Punks on Bitcoin. It’s where the past meets the future. 2️⃣ Our Virtual Showroom – This is where the experience becomes tangible. Immerse yourself in the world of Punks, interact with the art, and feel what it means to be part of this movement. In addition to these milestones, last October marked another significant moment in our journey. We organized our first 10k Ordinals Night during BTC Amsterdam—a night dedicated to celebrating this movement and its community. What began as a single evening holds the promise of becoming a recurring series, a tradition that brings us together to shape the future of Ordinals. But let’s be clear: these aren’t the endpoints. They’re just the beginning. Every decision we’ve made has been driven by one mission: to position Punks on Bitcoin among the most iconic and impactful projects in the Ordinals ecosystem. This journey is far from over. And if you’re here, reading this, you’re part of it too.

imper1um

10,935 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Marc Andreessen explains the "Elon Method" of leadership, and it completely contradicts how most CEOs operate today. Most leaders get bogged down trying to manage every single moving part of their business. But according to Andreessen, Elon's approach is actually the exact opposite: he delegates almost everything. He isn't involved in 99% of what his companies are doing on a daily basis. Instead, his entire focus is hunting for one specific thing: The Bottleneck. In any manufacturing chain, there is always a bottleneck keeping the line from running the way it's supposed to. It could be a lack of raw materials at the beginning, or a shortage of warehouse space at the end. Whatever it is, that bottleneck is holding everything up. Job number one is to remove it and get things flowing again. Elon has universalized this concept. He looks at every company like it's a conceptual assembly line—sometimes a literal one making cars and rockets. He knows that on any given week, there is guaranteed to be one main bottleneck holding his people back. So, what’s the secret to his management paradox? He relentlessly micromanages the solution to that one specific problem. He doesn't need to manage everything else because, by definition, the rest of the company is running better than the bottleneck. Once it's fixed, he moves on to the next biggest problem. But here is the part where most non-technical CEOs would completely fail trying to replicate this method: When Elon identifies the bottleneck, he has zero patience for bureaucracy. He doesn't ask the VP of Engineering to ask the Director to ask the Manager to ask the individual contributor to write a report to be reviewed in three weeks. He would throw that entire chain of command out the window. Instead, he bypasses the middleman completely. He goes straight to the manufacturing line or the software group, personally finds the exact line engineer who actually understands the technical nature of the bottleneck, sits in a room with them, and fixes the problem together.

Marc Andreessen explains the "Elon Method" of leadership, and it completely contradicts how most CEOs operate today. Most leaders get bogged down trying to manage every single moving part of their business. But according to Andreessen, Elon's approach is actually the exact opposite: he delegates almost everything. He isn't involved in 99% of what his companies are doing on a daily basis. Instead, his entire focus is hunting for one specific thing: The Bottleneck. In any manufacturing chain, there is always a bottleneck keeping the line from running the way it's supposed to. It could be a lack of raw materials at the beginning, or a shortage of warehouse space at the end. Whatever it is, that bottleneck is holding everything up. Job number one is to remove it and get things flowing again. Elon has universalized this concept. He looks at every company like it's a conceptual assembly line—sometimes a literal one making cars and rockets. He knows that on any given week, there is guaranteed to be one main bottleneck holding his people back. So, what’s the secret to his management paradox? He relentlessly micromanages the solution to that one specific problem. He doesn't need to manage everything else because, by definition, the rest of the company is running better than the bottleneck. Once it's fixed, he moves on to the next biggest problem. But here is the part where most non-technical CEOs would completely fail trying to replicate this method: When Elon identifies the bottleneck, he has zero patience for bureaucracy. He doesn't ask the VP of Engineering to ask the Director to ask the Manager to ask the individual contributor to write a report to be reviewed in three weeks. He would throw that entire chain of command out the window. Instead, he bypasses the middleman completely. He goes straight to the manufacturing line or the software group, personally finds the exact line engineer who actually understands the technical nature of the bottleneck, sits in a room with them, and fixes the problem together.

Ian Miles Cheong

71,502 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The reason Ruben Amorin needed “legs or ground eater” was because he never believed in players playing close to one another and keeping the ball for a long time. We often launched the ball to our strikers to beat press, he did the same at Sporting CP with Gyokeres and that caused our team needing to run so much because when we lose the second ball, we were in trouble.. It’s more about athleticism to him than techniques.. He never wanted players that are comfortable on the ball instead he likes players that can pick long passes so they can move the ball as quickly forward as possible and that’s why he never rated Mainoo.. Now Carrick has a different approach to football which is for players to play close to one another, take regulated and calculated risk instead of throwing the ball in the air at every chance which limits his need for “ground eaters” and increases his needs for actual ballers, guys that are comfortable on the ball and know how to pass it at the same time.

The reason Ruben Amorin needed “legs or ground eater” was because he never believed in players playing close to one another and keeping the ball for a long time. We often launched the ball to our strikers to beat press, he did the same at Sporting CP with Gyokeres and that caused our team needing to run so much because when we lose the second ball, we were in trouble.. It’s more about athleticism to him than techniques.. He never wanted players that are comfortable on the ball instead he likes players that can pick long passes so they can move the ball as quickly forward as possible and that’s why he never rated Mainoo.. Now Carrick has a different approach to football which is for players to play close to one another, take regulated and calculated risk instead of throwing the ball in the air at every chance which limits his need for “ground eaters” and increases his needs for actual ballers, guys that are comfortable on the ball and know how to pass it at the same time.

Utd©

256,622 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

🚨 3I/ATLAS: The Visitor No One Knows How to Explain Avi Loeb just revealed details that NASA didn’t… and they’re hard to ignore. Everyone has been talking about 3I/ATLAS — but what Harvard scientist Avi Loeb just said in a live interview takes the mystery to a whole new level. According to Loeb, 3I/ATLAS isn’t just “strange.” Its behavior is so unusual that scientists are now questioning if this object is even natural. Here’s what he revealed: 🔸 Jets firing in every direction — something real comets don’t do. 🔸 Nickel without iron — a combination only seen in man-made industrial alloys. 🔸 A glow in FRONT of the object, not behind it. No one knows why. 🔸 A perfect path along the plane of our planets — a one-in-500 chance for a random object. Almost like it’s moving with intention. 🔸 And yes… he openly said it might be a technological object, possibly releasing probes. Loeb even compared it to a “Trojan Horse,” warning that we shouldn’t assume every visitor is harmless. But here’s the part everyone is talking about: 🛰️ Amateur astronomers captured clearer images than NASA itself. Loeb says NASA’s cameras weren’t optimized for it — but the timing feels… odd. And now? 3I/ATLAS is getting closer. December 19 is the day to watch. Whatever this object is, its secrets are only just beginning to unfold. And the next few weeks could change everything we thought we knew. #3IATLAS #interstellarobject #spacemystery

🚨 3I/ATLAS: The Visitor No One Knows How to Explain Avi Loeb just revealed details that NASA didn’t… and they’re hard to ignore. Everyone has been talking about 3I/ATLAS — but what Harvard scientist Avi Loeb just said in a live interview takes the mystery to a whole new level. According to Loeb, 3I/ATLAS isn’t just “strange.” Its behavior is so unusual that scientists are now questioning if this object is even natural. Here’s what he revealed: 🔸 Jets firing in every direction — something real comets don’t do. 🔸 Nickel without iron — a combination only seen in man-made industrial alloys. 🔸 A glow in FRONT of the object, not behind it. No one knows why. 🔸 A perfect path along the plane of our planets — a one-in-500 chance for a random object. Almost like it’s moving with intention. 🔸 And yes… he openly said it might be a technological object, possibly releasing probes. Loeb even compared it to a “Trojan Horse,” warning that we shouldn’t assume every visitor is harmless. But here’s the part everyone is talking about: 🛰️ Amateur astronomers captured clearer images than NASA itself. Loeb says NASA’s cameras weren’t optimized for it — but the timing feels… odd. And now? 3I/ATLAS is getting closer. December 19 is the day to watch. Whatever this object is, its secrets are only just beginning to unfold. And the next few weeks could change everything we thought we knew. #3IATLAS #interstellarobject #spacemystery

Astronomy Vibes

33,370 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This guy thought the most dangerous job in the world was worth the money. $360,000 a year to dive hundreds of feet underwater, breathe exotic gas mixes, and weld steel in total darkness while living in a pressurized chamber for weeks. He knew the risks: Delta P that can suck a man through a tiny gap and crush him instantly, explosions from trapped gases, nitrogen narcosis that turns your brain to mush, and the constant threat of the bends if anything goes wrong on ascent. But he signed on anyway. He spent days locked in a saturation bell, descending to depths where one bubble of air at surface pressure would expand to lethal force. He welded pipelines in zero visibility, sparks flying in water that could ignite trapped pockets of gas. Every breath was metered, every move calculated, every second a reminder that the ocean doesn’t forgive mistakes. He came back richer, but changed—carrying scars, stories, and the knowledge that some paychecks come with a price tag most people would never touch. Was it worth it? What would make you descend into that darkness for $360,000 a year? Follow for more daily mind-blowing American wins.

This guy thought the most dangerous job in the world was worth the money. $360,000 a year to dive hundreds of feet underwater, breathe exotic gas mixes, and weld steel in total darkness while living in a pressurized chamber for weeks. He knew the risks: Delta P that can suck a man through a tiny gap and crush him instantly, explosions from trapped gases, nitrogen narcosis that turns your brain to mush, and the constant threat of the bends if anything goes wrong on ascent. But he signed on anyway. He spent days locked in a saturation bell, descending to depths where one bubble of air at surface pressure would expand to lethal force. He welded pipelines in zero visibility, sparks flying in water that could ignite trapped pockets of gas. Every breath was metered, every move calculated, every second a reminder that the ocean doesn’t forgive mistakes. He came back richer, but changed—carrying scars, stories, and the knowledge that some paychecks come with a price tag most people would never touch. Was it worth it? What would make you descend into that darkness for $360,000 a year? Follow for more daily mind-blowing American wins.

R͓̽Y͓̽a͓̽n͓̽C͓̽e͓̽y͓̽

132,455 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Wall Street Just Quietly Connected Its Secret Crypto Rail to Your Wallet Wall Street just quietly connected its private crypto rail straight to your wallet. Did you catch what just happened, or did it slip right past you? Everyone thinks regulation was the one thing keeping big money out of crypto. It wasn't. The real blocker was privacy. A bank or hedge fund could never use a network where the entire world watches every trade, every position, and who they deal with. So they built Canton, a blockchain made for institutions where only the parties in a deal can see it, but regulators can still look when they need to. Private and compliant at the same time. Then Circle launched USDCx on it, a private digital dollar backed by USDC. Then Kraken switched it on for everyday users. And Kraken now holds a Federal Reserve master account. Citadel, DRW, and Tradeweb already tested it with real Treasury financing. Read that again. The private institutional rail and the regular person are now one door apart. What it means for your money: the trillions that sat on the sidelines finally have a clean, compliant on ramp into crypto. That money tends to move the assets everyday people can already hold. The quiet unlocks matter more than the loud headlines, so position before the flood, not after. Start with the majors and keep learning. The full breakdown is inside the community, link in bio, one dollar a month. Follow for the moves the news skips.

Wall Street Just Quietly Connected Its Secret Crypto Rail to Your Wallet Wall Street just quietly connected its private crypto rail straight to your wallet. Did you catch what just happened, or did it slip right past you? Everyone thinks regulation was the one thing keeping big money out of crypto. It wasn't. The real blocker was privacy. A bank or hedge fund could never use a network where the entire world watches every trade, every position, and who they deal with. So they built Canton, a blockchain made for institutions where only the parties in a deal can see it, but regulators can still look when they need to. Private and compliant at the same time. Then Circle launched USDCx on it, a private digital dollar backed by USDC. Then Kraken switched it on for everyday users. And Kraken now holds a Federal Reserve master account. Citadel, DRW, and Tradeweb already tested it with real Treasury financing. Read that again. The private institutional rail and the regular person are now one door apart. What it means for your money: the trillions that sat on the sidelines finally have a clean, compliant on ramp into crypto. That money tends to move the assets everyday people can already hold. The quiet unlocks matter more than the loud headlines, so position before the flood, not after. Start with the majors and keep learning. The full breakdown is inside the community, link in bio, one dollar a month. Follow for the moves the news skips.

Alexander Lorenzo

17,274 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Daniel Dennett: You don't know your own mind as well as you think you do. In a 1993 Dutch documentary series, A Glorious Accident, philosopher Daniel Dennett laid out one of the most unsettling ideas in all of philosophy, the possibility that we are fundamentally mistaken about our own minds. We assume our minds are the one thing we have certain access to. Whatever else may be uncertain about the world, at least we know what we ourselves are thinking, right? Dennett argues this assumption is exactly what makes consciousness so hard to understand and so hard to challenge. He frames the core tension this way: on one hand, the mind seems like the most intimate thing we have access to. On the other, when we try to locate minds in the physical world as functions of the brain they seem to vanish entirely. "On the one hand we seem to know from the inside our minds… and then when we try to figure out how our minds exist in the world, how they could be a function of what's going on in our brains, it seems utterly mysterious." This is why we've never had a satisfying theory of consciousness, Dennett suggests. Not because we haven't thought hard enough, but because the very intuition we keep relying on that we have privileged, infallible access to our own thoughts may itself be wrong. Here he takes direct aim at Descartes. Descartes famously argued that while everything else could be doubted, the content of one's own conscious thought was beyond doubt. Whatever my thoughts are about may be false but what my thoughts are, and that they are mine? That, Descartes said, was the one certainty. Dennett's move is to reject precisely this: "Oddly enough, I'm claiming that he was wrong about that. The one thing he said was most certain I'm claiming that's not certain at all." We are, in some degree, fooled about our own minds. This isn't a claim that we're completely wrong about everything. It's a subtler and arguably more disturbing point: the seemingly undeniable intuition that we have transparent access to our own conscious states is, to some degree, false. We misread ourselves. We confabulate. The inner narrative we take for granted is, in part, a story we tell after the fact. Dennett spent his career making this case more formally, arguing that consciousness is less like a private theatre and more like a process of ongoing self-interpretation. If he's right, the question isn't just "how does the brain produce consciousness?" but "how does the brain produce the convincing illusion of transparent self-knowledge?"

Daniel Dennett: You don't know your own mind as well as you think you do. In a 1993 Dutch documentary series, A Glorious Accident, philosopher Daniel Dennett laid out one of the most unsettling ideas in all of philosophy, the possibility that we are fundamentally mistaken about our own minds. We assume our minds are the one thing we have certain access to. Whatever else may be uncertain about the world, at least we know what we ourselves are thinking, right? Dennett argues this assumption is exactly what makes consciousness so hard to understand and so hard to challenge. He frames the core tension this way: on one hand, the mind seems like the most intimate thing we have access to. On the other, when we try to locate minds in the physical world as functions of the brain they seem to vanish entirely. "On the one hand we seem to know from the inside our minds… and then when we try to figure out how our minds exist in the world, how they could be a function of what's going on in our brains, it seems utterly mysterious." This is why we've never had a satisfying theory of consciousness, Dennett suggests. Not because we haven't thought hard enough, but because the very intuition we keep relying on that we have privileged, infallible access to our own thoughts may itself be wrong. Here he takes direct aim at Descartes. Descartes famously argued that while everything else could be doubted, the content of one's own conscious thought was beyond doubt. Whatever my thoughts are about may be false but what my thoughts are, and that they are mine? That, Descartes said, was the one certainty. Dennett's move is to reject precisely this: "Oddly enough, I'm claiming that he was wrong about that. The one thing he said was most certain I'm claiming that's not certain at all." We are, in some degree, fooled about our own minds. This isn't a claim that we're completely wrong about everything. It's a subtler and arguably more disturbing point: the seemingly undeniable intuition that we have transparent access to our own conscious states is, to some degree, false. We misread ourselves. We confabulate. The inner narrative we take for granted is, in part, a story we tell after the fact. Dennett spent his career making this case more formally, arguing that consciousness is less like a private theatre and more like a process of ongoing self-interpretation. If he's right, the question isn't just "how does the brain produce consciousness?" but "how does the brain produce the convincing illusion of transparent self-knowledge?"

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

46,764 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Elon Musk described the government in four sentences and never made a political argument. He read out the schematic. Musk: "Government is a corporation in the limit. It is the most corporate thing. It is maximum corporation. And it's also a monopoly, and also is the only one that's allowed legally to do violence." Take the flag off it and look at what's underneath. It collects revenue. It employs millions. It owns land. It writes the rules it operates under. That's a corporation. Line for line. With three edits. You cannot choose a competitor. You cannot decline the transaction. It is the only one on earth permitted to use force to make you pay. Every other relationship in your life required your consent. This one required your birth. Musk: "Why would you want to give a corporation with no competition that can't even really go bankrupt more money?" There is no condition under which it stops. None was ever built in. Everything that has ever gotten better got better by being allowed to die. Evolution runs on extinction. Science runs on falsification. Markets run on bankruptcy. Your own body runs on cells that kill themselves on schedule. Failure isn't cruelty. It's information. It's the only mechanism in the universe that tells a system it was wrong. Take it away and the system doesn't become permanent. It becomes blind. A company that misreads the world loses customers. A government that misreads the world receives a larger budget the following year. It's the only structure we've built where failure is what feeds it. Musk: "I think the role of government should be that of like a referee, and not a player on the field." A referee was never supposed to be weak. He was supposed to be outside the outcome. The moment he starts scoring he isn't corrupt. Corruption would mean he broke a rule. He wrote the rules. He's just playing, and he's the only one allowed to keep score. A system like that never gets caught. It only gets old. Every civilization that collapsed did it with its institutions still standing. The buildings stayed. The titles stayed. The revenue arrived on schedule. What died was the feedback. The signal telling it that reality had moved and it hadn't. Rome didn't fall in a day. It stopped listening for a century and called it stability. That's the actual danger. Not tyranny. Deafness with a budget. And it runs deeper than politics. Everything you love is precious because it can be lost. A promise means something because the person making it will die. Your time matters because you don't get more of it. Mortality isn't the tragedy of being human. It's the only reason anything costs anything. Then we built one institution exempt from all of it. No death. No scarcity. No consequence. A thing that can never lose anything, deciding what everything is worth. It bills in dollars. It's paid in hours. And it has never once felt what an hour costs. It can be wrong for a century and feel nothing. You get eighty years and have to be right the first time. It doesn't have to win the argument. It only has to outlive the person making it, and it has never lost that one. It borrows against people who don't exist yet, and they will pay, because it will still be standing when they arrive. Then we handed it the only gun. This isn't a conspiracy. Conspiracies need competence and coordination. This is a design flaw, and design flaws only need time. That's the good news. A conspiracy can't be proven or fixed. A design flaw can be both. Everything good in your life exists because something was permitted to fail on the way to it. Every medicine. Every machine. Every idea that survived contact with reality. The one institution that cannot fail is the one holding the gun. That isn't a warning. It's an engineering problem. And every permanent thing on earth was designed by people who weren't.

Elon Musk described the government in four sentences and never made a political argument. He read out the schematic. Musk: "Government is a corporation in the limit. It is the most corporate thing. It is maximum corporation. And it's also a monopoly, and also is the only one that's allowed legally to do violence." Take the flag off it and look at what's underneath. It collects revenue. It employs millions. It owns land. It writes the rules it operates under. That's a corporation. Line for line. With three edits. You cannot choose a competitor. You cannot decline the transaction. It is the only one on earth permitted to use force to make you pay. Every other relationship in your life required your consent. This one required your birth. Musk: "Why would you want to give a corporation with no competition that can't even really go bankrupt more money?" There is no condition under which it stops. None was ever built in. Everything that has ever gotten better got better by being allowed to die. Evolution runs on extinction. Science runs on falsification. Markets run on bankruptcy. Your own body runs on cells that kill themselves on schedule. Failure isn't cruelty. It's information. It's the only mechanism in the universe that tells a system it was wrong. Take it away and the system doesn't become permanent. It becomes blind. A company that misreads the world loses customers. A government that misreads the world receives a larger budget the following year. It's the only structure we've built where failure is what feeds it. Musk: "I think the role of government should be that of like a referee, and not a player on the field." A referee was never supposed to be weak. He was supposed to be outside the outcome. The moment he starts scoring he isn't corrupt. Corruption would mean he broke a rule. He wrote the rules. He's just playing, and he's the only one allowed to keep score. A system like that never gets caught. It only gets old. Every civilization that collapsed did it with its institutions still standing. The buildings stayed. The titles stayed. The revenue arrived on schedule. What died was the feedback. The signal telling it that reality had moved and it hadn't. Rome didn't fall in a day. It stopped listening for a century and called it stability. That's the actual danger. Not tyranny. Deafness with a budget. And it runs deeper than politics. Everything you love is precious because it can be lost. A promise means something because the person making it will die. Your time matters because you don't get more of it. Mortality isn't the tragedy of being human. It's the only reason anything costs anything. Then we built one institution exempt from all of it. No death. No scarcity. No consequence. A thing that can never lose anything, deciding what everything is worth. It bills in dollars. It's paid in hours. And it has never once felt what an hour costs. It can be wrong for a century and feel nothing. You get eighty years and have to be right the first time. It doesn't have to win the argument. It only has to outlive the person making it, and it has never lost that one. It borrows against people who don't exist yet, and they will pay, because it will still be standing when they arrive. Then we handed it the only gun. This isn't a conspiracy. Conspiracies need competence and coordination. This is a design flaw, and design flaws only need time. That's the good news. A conspiracy can't be proven or fixed. A design flaw can be both. Everything good in your life exists because something was permitted to fail on the way to it. Every medicine. Every machine. Every idea that survived contact with reality. The one institution that cannot fail is the one holding the gun. That isn't a warning. It's an engineering problem. And every permanent thing on earth was designed by people who weren't.

Dustin

200,809 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

Elon Musk was offered the chance to have his own product destroyed on camera, unscripted, and he took it in under a second. Musk: "Fuck yeah, let's do it." Then they walked out to the garage. Rogan drew an 80 pound bow on the side of a Cybertruck, cameras still running. A 545 grain arrow at roughly 275 feet per second into cold rolled stainless. Sparks off the panel. The broadhead flattened. The arrow blew apart. Rogan: "Barely scratched it." That panel is the same steel he picked for Starship after walking away from carbon fiber. A man builds a rocket, wraps a truck in it, then hands you a weapon and stands there. There's no paint on it. No clear coat, no filler, nothing between you and the material. That stainless is structure, not decoration. Nobody offers up their own product like that unless it has already been tested where nobody was watching. Most people saw a stunt. What they watched was a man putting a claim in front of physics, which has no opinion of him and could have humiliated him live. Almost nothing else works that way now. We have built an entire civilization out of statements that can never be checked. Decks, dashboards, mission statements, narratives engineered so that no single moment can ever prove them wrong. An unfalsifiable claim isn't a lie. Lies can be caught. This is a shape that looks like a claim and never has to meet anything. The supply of those just went vertical. Words cost nothing to produce now, at infinite volume, by machine. Anything in infinite supply prices to zero. So what still has a bid. Only what survived contact with something indifferent to it. Steel that got hit. Code that shipped. A number audited by reality instead of by a slide. Nothing indifferent to you has ever lied to you. Only the things that want something from you can. Trust has never been anything but exposure to failure, witnessed. Every bridge you've driven over was somebody agreeing to be wrong in public. Every engine, every vaccine, every building still standing. The entire inherited world was built by people who could have been destroyed in front of everyone and stood there anyway. Most of us have quietly optimized ourselves in the other direction. A resume nobody audits. A persona with no failure mode. A version of yourself that only exists where it can't be tested. That isn't a character flaw. It's what the last twenty years paid for. The payout schedule just changed. Proof is about to be the scarcest asset in the economy, and the one thing that can't be generated. It has to be earned once, in contact with something that doesn't care. Nobody controls access to that. You don't need scale or permission. You need one true thing you'd stand beside while somebody takes a shot at it. He stood there and let the arrow come. The arrow came apart. Everything made only of words does.

Elon Musk was offered the chance to have his own product destroyed on camera, unscripted, and he took it in under a second. Musk: "Fuck yeah, let's do it." Then they walked out to the garage. Rogan drew an 80 pound bow on the side of a Cybertruck, cameras still running. A 545 grain arrow at roughly 275 feet per second into cold rolled stainless. Sparks off the panel. The broadhead flattened. The arrow blew apart. Rogan: "Barely scratched it." That panel is the same steel he picked for Starship after walking away from carbon fiber. A man builds a rocket, wraps a truck in it, then hands you a weapon and stands there. There's no paint on it. No clear coat, no filler, nothing between you and the material. That stainless is structure, not decoration. Nobody offers up their own product like that unless it has already been tested where nobody was watching. Most people saw a stunt. What they watched was a man putting a claim in front of physics, which has no opinion of him and could have humiliated him live. Almost nothing else works that way now. We have built an entire civilization out of statements that can never be checked. Decks, dashboards, mission statements, narratives engineered so that no single moment can ever prove them wrong. An unfalsifiable claim isn't a lie. Lies can be caught. This is a shape that looks like a claim and never has to meet anything. The supply of those just went vertical. Words cost nothing to produce now, at infinite volume, by machine. Anything in infinite supply prices to zero. So what still has a bid. Only what survived contact with something indifferent to it. Steel that got hit. Code that shipped. A number audited by reality instead of by a slide. Nothing indifferent to you has ever lied to you. Only the things that want something from you can. Trust has never been anything but exposure to failure, witnessed. Every bridge you've driven over was somebody agreeing to be wrong in public. Every engine, every vaccine, every building still standing. The entire inherited world was built by people who could have been destroyed in front of everyone and stood there anyway. Most of us have quietly optimized ourselves in the other direction. A resume nobody audits. A persona with no failure mode. A version of yourself that only exists where it can't be tested. That isn't a character flaw. It's what the last twenty years paid for. The payout schedule just changed. Proof is about to be the scarcest asset in the economy, and the one thing that can't be generated. It has to be earned once, in contact with something that doesn't care. Nobody controls access to that. You don't need scale or permission. You need one true thing you'd stand beside while somebody takes a shot at it. He stood there and let the arrow come. The arrow came apart. Everything made only of words does.

Dustin

82,857 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

At a packed summer music festival in Miami, he started noticing something strange near the portable toilets. Scattered on the ground were empty phone cases, some with driver’s licenses and credit cards still tucked inside. Pickpockets were stealing phones in the crowd, removing the cases to resell the devices, and tossing the evidence where no one wanted to look. Instead of ignoring it, he put on gloves, gathered every ID and card he could find, and spent the next few days tracking people down through social media and mailing back what he recovered. It’s wild how creative thieves can be, but it’s just as powerful to see someone choose integrity. One small decision can restore a little faith in humanity. In a world where most people would walk past and mind their business, would you take the time to help strangers like that?

At a packed summer music festival in Miami, he started noticing something strange near the portable toilets. Scattered on the ground were empty phone cases, some with driver’s licenses and credit cards still tucked inside. Pickpockets were stealing phones in the crowd, removing the cases to resell the devices, and tossing the evidence where no one wanted to look. Instead of ignoring it, he put on gloves, gathered every ID and card he could find, and spent the next few days tracking people down through social media and mailing back what he recovered. It’s wild how creative thieves can be, but it’s just as powerful to see someone choose integrity. One small decision can restore a little faith in humanity. In a world where most people would walk past and mind their business, would you take the time to help strangers like that?

Dr. CZ

72,778 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This guy with no design background just built a 3D website that would have cost a client $8,000 at any agency. He didn't hire a developer. He didn't open Figma. He opened Claude and started typing what he wanted to see. 3D objects that move on scroll. Animations that follow the cursor. Cinematic transitions between sections. Claude generated the code. Emergent rendered it live. He adjusted with more prompts until the screen showed something he couldn't have built in 6 months of learning. The whole thing took one afternoon. What used to require a senior developer and a $15,000 budget now requires knowing how to describe what you want clearly. That's it. That's the only skill. Most people have Claude. Almost none of them know how to actually use it. This article below fixes that.

This guy with no design background just built a 3D website that would have cost a client $8,000 at any agency. He didn't hire a developer. He didn't open Figma. He opened Claude and started typing what he wanted to see. 3D objects that move on scroll. Animations that follow the cursor. Cinematic transitions between sections. Claude generated the code. Emergent rendered it live. He adjusted with more prompts until the screen showed something he couldn't have built in 6 months of learning. The whole thing took one afternoon. What used to require a senior developer and a $15,000 budget now requires knowing how to describe what you want clearly. That's it. That's the only skill. Most people have Claude. Almost none of them know how to actually use it. This article below fixes that.

Anatoli Kopadze

363,251 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Everyone's optimizing prompts. The actual bottleneck is where your context lives. Right now Slack owns it. Every idea you iterated on, every thread you thought hard about (sitting in someone else's sessions). Try moving it somewhere else and you'll find out it doesn't move. Buzz flips that. Your context is the foundation, and everything plugs into it: - Projects wired to GitHub. - Agents you can pull into a huddle. - Shared compute — flip one setting, download a local model to one machine, and your whole team chats with it from their own laptops. Which means four people with one beefy Mac Mini can run a real setup instead of buying unlimited plans at $200/month. And $200 is only today's number. Tomorrow it might be $2,000. Models have been yanked days after launch. Governments are already deciding what you're allowed to ask. You're building a business on top of these tools. Own the context. Keep the choice.

Everyone's optimizing prompts. The actual bottleneck is where your context lives. Right now Slack owns it. Every idea you iterated on, every thread you thought hard about (sitting in someone else's sessions). Try moving it somewhere else and you'll find out it doesn't move. Buzz flips that. Your context is the foundation, and everything plugs into it: - Projects wired to GitHub. - Agents you can pull into a huddle. - Shared compute — flip one setting, download a local model to one machine, and your whole team chats with it from their own laptops. Which means four people with one beefy Mac Mini can run a real setup instead of buying unlimited plans at $200/month. And $200 is only today's number. Tomorrow it might be $2,000. Models have been yanked days after launch. Governments are already deciding what you're allowed to ask. You're building a business on top of these tools. Own the context. Keep the choice.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

23,781 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

Rev. Dr. Earle J. Fisher, a pastor in Memphis and a professor at LeMoyne-Owen College, spreads the lie that "everybody" on Karmelo Anthony's jury was white "It's hard to say that you are in front of a jury of your peers when you are a young black man and everybody on the jury is white." "I think at the end of the day, it's a tragic thing and it happens too often and inequitably for our young black folk in those systems and in those situations, whereby when it is our white counterparts, they seem to be met with a level of grace." "Here's another catastrophic example of how slippery the slope is for black folks. And, you know, one wrong move where somebody would be arguing self-defense, now they like, 'Naw, ain't no self-defense for you n*ggas.'"

Rev. Dr. Earle J. Fisher, a pastor in Memphis and a professor at LeMoyne-Owen College, spreads the lie that "everybody" on Karmelo Anthony's jury was white "It's hard to say that you are in front of a jury of your peers when you are a young black man and everybody on the jury is white." "I think at the end of the day, it's a tragic thing and it happens too often and inequitably for our young black folk in those systems and in those situations, whereby when it is our white counterparts, they seem to be met with a level of grace." "Here's another catastrophic example of how slippery the slope is for black folks. And, you know, one wrong move where somebody would be arguing self-defense, now they like, 'Naw, ain't no self-defense for you n*ggas.'"

Breitbart News

39,215 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I just rewatched Ladies First on Netflix, and this movie still hits hard. It starts in a world where men run everything making decisions for women, silencing their opinions, and only giving them a seat at the table for appearance's sake. One woman is promoted as a creative director in her company just so they can say they support feminism, yet no one listens to her voice. But then everything switches. Women become the ones in power, and men experience the same treatment women have endured for years. Suddenly, he has to fight to be heard, prove himself constantly, and even compromise his dignity to move up the ladder. What makes this movie powerful is not just the role reversal but how clearly it exposes the unfair standards society normalises every day. Sometimes people only understand pain when they’re forced to live through it.

I just rewatched Ladies First on Netflix, and this movie still hits hard. It starts in a world where men run everything making decisions for women, silencing their opinions, and only giving them a seat at the table for appearance's sake. One woman is promoted as a creative director in her company just so they can say they support feminism, yet no one listens to her voice. But then everything switches. Women become the ones in power, and men experience the same treatment women have endured for years. Suddenly, he has to fight to be heard, prove himself constantly, and even compromise his dignity to move up the ladder. What makes this movie powerful is not just the role reversal but how clearly it exposes the unfair standards society normalises every day. Sometimes people only understand pain when they’re forced to live through it.

Talkwithsisib 🎬 | Love & Movies

20,552 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The pool hall scene in Carlito’s Way is one of the most suspenseful set pieces in all of crime cinema. However, when the studio executives saw an early cut, they thought it was too long and asked Brian De Palma to cut it back - but instead, he made it even longer. The writer of the film, David Koepp explains…. “We showed an early cut to the studio, and one of their notes was that the pool hall scene seemed too long. I was talking to Brian about it, and I said, “what do you think about this note that the pool hall scene is too long? I don't think they're right about that.” And he said, “No, no, no, they're absolutely right, they're absolutely right. But what they mean is that it's not long enough” And I thought he was just being cheeky and defiant. But actually, no - I mean, he knows suspense so well, he felt that it was just that he had failed to set up a little bit of the geography of the suspense - which is of course, his mastery. You know - the guys in the bathroom, the door is slightly open, the other guys over here - all that great establishment of where everybody is, and how close they are to each other, and what all the stakes are. The suspense only works later if that stuff's set up properly before. And so when he went back and furthered some of that coverage and expanded the front of the scene a little bit, the scene was nail biting and great. And they saw another cut and said, “much better shorter, much better shorter.”

The pool hall scene in Carlito’s Way is one of the most suspenseful set pieces in all of crime cinema. However, when the studio executives saw an early cut, they thought it was too long and asked Brian De Palma to cut it back - but instead, he made it even longer. The writer of the film, David Koepp explains…. “We showed an early cut to the studio, and one of their notes was that the pool hall scene seemed too long. I was talking to Brian about it, and I said, “what do you think about this note that the pool hall scene is too long? I don't think they're right about that.” And he said, “No, no, no, they're absolutely right, they're absolutely right. But what they mean is that it's not long enough” And I thought he was just being cheeky and defiant. But actually, no - I mean, he knows suspense so well, he felt that it was just that he had failed to set up a little bit of the geography of the suspense - which is of course, his mastery. You know - the guys in the bathroom, the door is slightly open, the other guys over here - all that great establishment of where everybody is, and how close they are to each other, and what all the stakes are. The suspense only works later if that stuff's set up properly before. And so when he went back and furthered some of that coverage and expanded the front of the scene a little bit, the scene was nail biting and great. And they saw another cut and said, “much better shorter, much better shorter.”

Gangster Cinema Central

62,984 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce